Skip to content

Month: February 2023

Advantage: Private insurers

Make it stop!

Even readers not “of a certain age” have seen the inescapable Medicare Advantage ads on TV promising seniors more health care for less. Why, they’ll even add money to your Social Security check every single month!

It sounds too good to be true. You know why.

Consumer complaints about the ads have doubled in just the last year, reports Forbes. A Senate committee found “evidence that beneficiaries are being inundated with aggressive marketing tactics as well as false and misleading information.”

Congressman Mark Pocan, Democrat of Wisconsin and former co-chair of the congressional progressive caucus (CPC), has seen enough. He may be in the House minority, but he’s playing “the long game.” On Wednesday, he will reintroduce the Save Medicare Act aimed at reinforcing traditional Medicare. It may go nowhere this session, but he’s building support for when Democrats regain a House majority (The Guardian):

The bill targets Medicare Advantage plans, which Pocan and his allies say the plans have turned into a cash grab for insurance companies. The program, in which healthcare coverage options from private insurance companies serve as an alternative to traditional Medicare, was initially designed as a cost-cutting measure to encourage insurance companies to provide seniors with healthcare coverage at a competitive price. Nearly half of Medicare-eligible Americans are now enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan.

But multiple lawsuits have documented how private insurance companies seek to overdiagnose Medicare Advantage enrollees to receive more money from the federal government, according to a recent New York Times analysis. The Times found that eight of the ten biggest Medicare Advantage providers have submitted inflated bills to the government. Estimates of the cost of Medicare Advantage overbilling in 2020 alone range from $12bn to $25bn.

That explains why insurers market these plans so heavily. As health care industry whistleblower Wendell Potter says, the only “advantage” to these HMO-style networked plans is for the insurers.

Pocan wants advantage plans curtailed.

“This has become an additional profit center for these companies, when that could have actually gone towards enhancing Medicare,” Pocan said. “This is a program that doesn’t benefit most seniors.”

The Save Medicare Act would prohibit insurance companies from using the word “Medicare” in plan titles, helping seniors to distinguish between traditional Medicare and private offerings. The bill would also fine companies who attempt to engage in the marketing practice.

Pocan’s own mother, in her early 90s and not especially mobile, was once unable to receive care because her Medicare Advantage plan required her to travel to a doctor’s office in her local community. Traditional Medicare would have allowed a medical provider to come directly to her assisted living facility.

They don’t mention those minor details in the hard-sell.

“Many seniors don’t know the difference between Medicare and Medicare Advantage. They don’t understand that it’s not really the government program they paid into,” Pocan said. “I think a lot of seniors are getting ripped off.”

Some seniors with limited retirement funds find these pitches enticing because they cannot afford more per month. But on these plans they may pay more later. As Potter told a pre-pandemic audience here, insurers know what you’ll buy.

Don’t.

Minnesota nice strikes back

Democrats codify right to abortion in L’Étoile du Nord

Railing with the Minnesota State motto “L’Étoile du Nord”
At the Minnesota State Capitol, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA. Photo by Myotus via Wikimedia Commons.

It’s surprising that this isn’t getting more notice (The New Republic):

One day after the Republican National Committee directed Republicans to “go on offense” against abortion rights, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz signed a bill codifying abortion rights as a guaranteed right to Minnesotans. The legislation will shield residents from any looming Republican attacks, even those that come from the courts.

The Protect Reproductive Options Act, or PRO Act, codifies protections to reproductive health care, including abortion, birth control, sterilization, and family planning and fertility services. The act, just a page long, guarantees that “every individual has a fundamental right to make autonomous decisions about the individual’s own reproductive health.”

The new law comes as Minnesota Democrats now lead all three chambers of the government, as they maintained the state House and governorship, and took control of the state Senate in November. In a midterm election partially defined by backlash against the overturning of Roe v. Wade, the new narrow majority poetically codified abortion rights into state statutes.

Minnesota is the first state to enact abortion protections this year.

Upon signing the bill into law, Walz said:

“We’re sending a message today that’s very clear: Your rights are respected in this state,” Walz said. “You make your final decisions about your health, your family and your life.”

AP adds some background:

Abortion rights were already protected under a 1995 Minnesota Supreme Court decision known as Doe v. Gomez, which held that the state Constitution protects abortion rights. And a district court judge last summer declared unconstitutional several restrictions that previous Legislatures had put in place, including a 24-hour waiting period and a parental notification requirement for minors.

But the new law adds an extra layer of safety should the composition of Minnesota’s courts change. Other protections are in legislative process, including a bill to repeal a stautory restriction a district court ruled unconstitutional last summer.

State Senate and House GOP leaders call the bill “dangerous” and “extreme,” naturally. All Republicans voted against the bill.

Reactionary conservatives are fighting a cultural civil war against modernity, one with fascist notes. Whether it’s women’s rights, voting rights, public education, immigration, religion, etc., their goal (and right-wing punditry’s business model) is to get and keep people angry. Angry at anything “woke” (whatever that means), angry at liberals, at city-dwellers, at non-whites, at “elites,” at Democrats, at the rule of law when applied to any of their tribe. At M&Ms. Economic winds that blow their way won’t change that despite Democrats’ best efforts to address industrial decay in MAGA country.

Just as it’s wishful thinking for Republicans to wait for Trump to die or face criminal charges, it is unhelpful for the left to wait for the angrified MAGA generation to die off or burn out from exhaustion. They are addicted to their daily outrage fix. I’ve watched the anger industrial complex since the heyday of pass-it-on emails over a decade and a half ago. They’ve gotten more extreme, not less, and show no signs of burning out or fading away. Their leaders have become more machiavellian if not mussolinian.

Minnesota has rejected appeasment for direct confrontation. Democrats in other states should follow its lead.