Skip to content

Month: July 2023

Democracy-optional party tells Supreme Court to f%#k off

A Southern man don’t need them around, anyhow

Ala-by God-bama!

“In an echo of mid-century southern defiance of school desegregation, the Yellowhammer State’s Republican-controlled legislature defied the conservative-dominated Court’s directive to redraw its congressional map with an additional Black-majority district,” Adam Serwer explains in The Atlantic:

Openly defying a Supreme Court order is rare—almost as rare as conservative justices recognizing that the Fifteenth Amendment outlaws racial discrimination in voting. Under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, states are sometimes required to draw districts with majority-minority populations. This requirement exists because after Reconstruction, one of the methods southern states used to disenfranchise their Black populations was racially gerrymandering congressional districts so that Black voters could not affect the outcome of congressional elections. Earlier this year, Alabama asked the Supreme Court to further weaken the Voting Rights Act so as to preserve its racial gerrymander.

More than a quarter of Alabama’s population is Black, but the state’s Republican majority has racially gerrymandered that population into a single district out of seven because it fears those voters might elect Democrats. The partisan motive is no excuse for racial discrimination—1870s Democrats also had a partisan interest in disenfranchising Black voters, who were then reliably Republican. After failing to get the Supreme Court to overturn Section 2, Alabama decided that following the law was optional.

Hell, yeah!

Even as the right criticizes Democrats’ calls for ethics rules for the court in light of conservative justices’ non-transparency about gifts from ultra-rich supporters, Alabama reserves the right to ignore court rulings it dislikes. Democrats’ complaints only further deligitimize the Roberts court, dontcha know? Conservative states reserve the right to treat unfavorable court rulings as mere recommendations.

At one point, the right-wing legal martyr and originalist Robert Bork was so frustrated by the Court being insufficiently conservative that he declared, “As our institutional arrangements now stand, the Court can never be made a legitimate element of a basically democratic polity.” In the right’s view, the judiciary was an “imperial judiciary,” an “out of control branch of government.”

That’s the highfalutin way conservatives say that the only legitimate court is one in which heads, they win and tails, libs lose. SCOTUS is illegitimate when rulings go against states like Alabama. See, “voiding constitutional prohibitions on racial discrimination” is a southern tradition. Heritage. Like slavery and the Confederate battle flag.

Serwer is even more blunt:

It is clear the right that views the Court as a political instrument for imposing conservative policy, and when the Court fails to heed its obligation to do so, they can simply ignore it. This is consistent with the movement’s Trumpist turn toward the belief that the legitimacy of any practice or institution—elections, fundamental freedoms, the state itself—is conferred not by the consent of the governed but by the consent of the right. You have an inalienable access to the franchise as long as you vote Republican. You have free speech as long as you say conservative things. The free market is free only when it leads to conservative outcomes. The Supreme Court’s rulings are the law of the land, except if those rulings are not what conservatives want.

Not to single out the South exclusively, that’s also how Ohio Republicans treat their state Supreme Court’s rulings.

The Democracy Optional Party. Ain’t that grand?

Slippery, meet Slope

The morphing anti-woke war

Mike Luckovich cartoon from July 18, 2023.

Another of the downsides to the steady withering of “X” is the former bird platform’s function as a town square where professional and amateur media critics could find an audience, complains Dan Froomkin of Press Watch.

“Political reporters at our leading news organizations routinely put a thumb on the scale in favor of the far right – both by failing to call out its racist and increasingly homophobic nature, and by adopting right-wing frames in reporting current events,” Froomkin writes. He offers a short list of recent stories in which major media outlets tiptoe around the increasingly overt racist and homophobic impulses behind conservative actions and rhetoric.

“The right-wing’s anti-woke war against trans people has now —  as was entirely predictable —  morphed into a war on any expression of gender or sexuality that isn’t Biblically-approved procreative sex between a man and a woman,” Froomkin posted to the X site on Friday.

Slippery, meet Slope:

The Washington Post story about the homophobic attack on libraries that I mentioned above is just one example. The article by Gregory Schneider, was headlined “Public libraries are the latest front in culture war battle over books“.

But this is not a story about concerned “community members” legitimately worried about “terrible violations of the social order, of sexualizing and brainwashing children,” as Schneider described it.

There has been no violation of the social order — unless that social order is mandatory cis heterosexuality, which, at least for the moment, it is not. There has been no sexualizing and brainwashing at these libraries.

The story is actually about a little library defending itself against steamrolling by homophobic zealots who call anything that isn’t heterosexual pornography.

Twenty-seven paragraphs from the start, Schneider finally offers readers a hint that virtually all the people behind the complaints “said they had not read the books, only summaries.”

It’s as if reporting on Ohio Republicans’ effort to raise the bar for amending the state constitution in the August special election treated it as a legislative debate rather than it being “100%” about blocking the abortion rights amendment on the ballot in November.

Yes, there’s more:

A New York Times story headlined “Bungled Hiring of Journalism Director Exposes a Rift at Texas A&M” dramatically underplayed the role of racism in both the “bungled” hiring and the alleged “rift”.

Kathleen McElroy’s job offer to be the tenured director of the journalism program at A&M was rescinded because she was Black.

This was euphemized by reporters Colbi Edmonds, Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs and Marina Trahan Martinez, who wrote that the “shifting offers” were due to “a backlash over the Black professor’s views on race and diversity.”

Worse, they turned a story about a powerful racist subculture into one about a “rift” over “opposition to diversity initiatives”.

There is no evidence of such a rift. Indeed, faculty members, for instance,  are appropriately aghast at the administration’s moral collapse in succumbing to racist criticisms.

To support their hypothesis that “some Aggies are questioning the direction of the university,” the reporters quote who? A conservative news website and the chairman of the university’s Young Americans for Freedom chapter. That’s it.

The appearance of non-stories is something, like Froomkin, I’ve noticed lately, stories where at the end you ask yourself what the point was. Froomkin mentions one by the New York Times that suggests the Department of Justice is wasting resources investigating Donald Trump. It concludes, “These efforts, taken as a whole, do not appear to be siphoning resources that would otherwise be used to combat crime or undertake other investigations.”

Saguaro cacti are collapsing in the prolonged, record-high Arizona heat. Stories on the impacts are likely to chalk it up to a heat wave, to temperatures heating up “over time” and to failure of summer monsoon rains to arrive. If mentioned at all as a factor, climate change might appear in the last paragraph.

Mustn’t ruffle delicate feathers on the climate change-denying right.

Friday Night Soother

The youngest offspring at Zoo Vienna is hard to miss. On July 17, a female fur seal was born. When it’s hungry, it loudly draws attention to itself to get its mother’s care. “In the first few days, the mother and the young seal were in the backstage area, but now they can be seen by the visitors in a specially designed shallow water area. The little one is already making its first attempts at swimming. The mother is very experienced and takes good care of her offspring,” says Simone Haderthauer, the zoological curator. Fur seals can swim and dive from birth, but practice makes perfect! Once the young seal is confident both on land and in water, she will join the rest of the group.

The commented feeding of the fur seals is a highlight of every zoo visit for many visitors. However, it will take some time before the young seal exclusively eats fish and participates in the feeding. During the first six to eight months, seal pups are nursed by their mothers. Haderthauer says, “Currently, even the adult seals don’t have a big appetite for mackerel, sprats, and other fish. In the summer, after the pups are born, it’s also the mating season, and the male, who keeps a harem, has little time to eat.” The animal care team has also noticed that the recent heatwave has further reduced the seals’ appetite. It’s a good thing that cooling down is now the order of the day.”

The expected meltdown has arrived

Trump addressed the new superseding indictment:

Donald Trump on Friday defended the handling of surveillance footage at his Florida home that is at the center of major new criminal charges in the federal case over the former president’s retention of classified documents.

“These are my tapes that we gave to them,” Trump told a conservative radio host in his first public interview since being accused of the new crimes.

“And they basically then say, ‘That’s not enough,’” Trump said on “The John Fredericks Show.”

Trump, the leading candidate for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, also vowed to continue his campaign even if he is convicted and sentenced.

“Not at all, there’s nothing in the Constitution to say that it could,” Trump said when asked if being sentenced would end his presidential bid.

Later in the day, Trump fired off several social media posts raging against the Department of Justice.

He accused special counsel Jack Smith, the prosecutor leading the classified documents probe, of “attempting to destroy the lives of two fine people who have worked for me (and have done a great job!) for a long time.”

“This is textbook Third World intimidation by rabid, lawless prosecutors,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. In a follow-up post, he called for Smith, his prosecutors and Attorney General Merrick Garland to be jailed.

Waaaaah!!!!

“They bleached the server!”

In light of the news that Trump ordered his minions to “erase the server” that held the surveillance footage outside the storage room at Mar-a-lago, I’m just going to leave that here for you to enjoy.

Trump projection 101.

Maybe you should mind the store, Ron

How’s it going down in Florida these days?

The inflation rate hit a two-year low in June but the financial relief may not be felt in Florida.

The Federal Reserve raised the interest rate again on Wednesday in an effort to lower inflation. It comes as the Tampa Bay area still has among the highest inflation rates reported, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater has a Consumer Price Index, which is measured for inflation, of 7.3% for the year ended in May. 

Meanwhile, the Consumer Price Index grew at an annual rate of 3% in June — the smallest increase since March 2021, the Labor Department said on Wednesday. 

South Florida is also reporting similar numbers. 

The CPI for Miami-Ft. Lauderdale-West Palm Beach is at 6.9% in June from the year before.

[…]

Those like Nhick Ramiro Pacis of Tampa keep an eye on his budget from the rising costs at the grocery to his insurance.

“It’s really affecting a lot of people. Not only me,” Pacis said. 

Like other Floridians, Pacis has had to make adjustments. On top of working two jobs, he’s cut down on TV subscriptions and dining out in an effort to save. 

Claar said it’ll be difficult to understand just how soon Florida’s higher inflation rates will cool down. As desirable of a market as it was before for factors like real estate, it’s undergone high interest since the start of the pandemic.

“I don’t think a responsible economist at this point can tell you the day or the month or maybe even the year that things will begin to look more normal… because we don’t quite know yet what the new normal is going to be,” Claar said.

DeSantis seems to think killing “woke-ism” is what’s important. The Florida economy, not so much.

And they are doubling down:

Media Matters took a look at the curriculum:

A cartoon Booker T. Washington distorting the history of the Civil War. A narrator explaining that embracing climate denialism is akin to participating in the Warsaw Uprising. An instructional video telling girls that conforming to gender stereotypes is a great way to embrace their femininity. A dramatization of the supposedly civilizing, benevolent era of British colonial rule in India.

These are just some of the episodes of PragerU Kids — an offshoot of right-wing propaganda organization PragerU — that Florida has just approved for use in its public school classrooms, reflecting and potentially accelerating the state’s hard conservative turn. 
“The state of Florida just announced that we are now becoming an official vendor,” said PragerU CEO Marissa Streit in a video heralding the news. She claimed that schools have “been hijacked by the left” and “used by union bosses” to pursue an agenda “not for our children.”

“We are just getting started — additional states are signing up,” Streit added.

Here’s one very special example tailor made for DeSantis’ FLorida:

Leo & Layla: Lessons in collective forgetting

Another series sees animated characters Leo and Layla traveling back in time to learn from historical figures. In one episode, the pair discuss slavery with a fictionalized Booker T. Washington.   

“I hate that our country had slavery,” Layla says. “Mr. Washington, sometimes do you ever wish you could have lived somewhere else? Like a different country?”

“That’s a great question, and I hate slavery too, but it’s been a reality everywhere in the world,” Washington responds.

The fictional Washington then elides the reality of the U.S. Civil War by adopting the passive voice. This flattens the process through which enslaved people freed themselves — alongside the Union Army — into an undifferentiated joint venture of the entire country.

“America was one of the first places on earth to outlaw slavery,” Washington says, getting the timeline completely reversed. “And hundreds of thousands of men gave their lives in a war that resulted in my freedom.”

“When you put it that way, it totally makes sense,” Leo responds.

Washington’s comforting account of history adds up to a conclusion squarely in line with DeSantis’ anti-critical race theory agenda. “Future generations are never responsible for sins of the past,” Washington reassures the children.

“OK I’ll keep doing my best to treat everyone well and won’t feel guilty about historical stuff,” Layla responds, now absolved and innocent.

PragerU Kids’ anti-anti-racism project includes a predictable deradicalization of Martin Luther King Jr., whom Leo and Layla travel to meet.

“My parents … taught me that racism, thinking people are better than or lesser than because of skin color, is wrong and to hate the wrong but never the wrongdoer,” the fictional King tells the kids.

“Wow. That’s so noble,” Layla responds, in an inadvertent but tellingly condescending way.

“My Christian faith directs me to love my neighbors, even when they act in ways I don’t like, and that’s always helped me remain peaceful,” King replies.

Like in the “Around the World” segments, Leo and Layla also have ample opportunities to promote Western chauvinism. 

“What’s up with the face?” Layla asks her brother at the beginning of their Christopher Columbus episode. “You look stressed.”

“I’m just doing some research,” Leo responds. “Was today weird for you?”

“Yeah. How’d you guess?” Layla says.

“Columbus Day,” Leo says.

“Or Native American Day, or Indigenous People’s Day — it’s weird, right?” Layla replies.

The kids then discuss how their teachers and peers got into arguments about whether Columbus should have his own holiday. 

“The side against Columbus says he was a really mean guy who spread slavery, disease, and violence to people who would’ve been better off if he’d never gone to the new world,” Leo says. “The side for him says he was a really courageous guy who loved exploring, inspired generations, and spread Christianity and Western civilization to people who really benefited from new ways of thinking and doing things.”

When the two kids meet Columbus, he assures them that he was justified in his violence against indigenous people. 

“The place I discovered was beautiful, but it wasn’t exactly a paradise of civilization, and the native people were far from peaceful,” he tells them.

Like the fictional Booker T. Washington, Columbus naturalizes slavery and the slave trade as something that happened everywhere.

“Slavery is as old as time and has taken place in every corner of the world,” Columbus says.

“Well, in our time we view slavery as being evil and terrible,” Layla corrects him.

“Ah. Magnifico! That’s wonderful,” Columbus responds. “I am glad humanity has reached such a time. But you said you’re from 500 years in the future? How can you come here to the 15th century and judge me by your standards from the 21st century?”

As this episode shows, the overriding theme of Leo and Layla’s adventures — and PragerU Kids in general — is that schools have made white children feel uncomfortable by teaching them about racism, colonialism, and other forms of oppression, and that that anxiety must be alleviated through a rigorous disavowal that the past plays any role in ordering the present. If historical wrongs committed by white people in the United States or Europeans must be acknowledged, we must teach that those injustices were undertaken with good intentions. Even more importantly, the past must remain firmly in the past, lest Leo and Layla lose their innocence and be forced to confront continuities of domination.

And this:

Closer to home, “Los Angeles: Mateo Backs the Blue” is anti-Black Lives Matter, pro-cop propaganda. The video describes a Mexican immigrant family that moved to Los Angeles and had their lives upended by the death of George Floyd, whom the narrator characterizes as “a Black man who resisted arrest.”  

“Activists claimed that police were targeting the Black community and purposefully killing unarmed Black men,” the narrator says. “As the false claims of racial targeting spread, so did the anger and violence.” 

Mateo develops fondness for his school’s “resource officer” — a euphemism, though one not unique to PragerU Kids — and comes to view the cop as “as a guide, a mentor, and a protector, not how he has seen police characterized in the news, as mean-spirited bullies.”

I particularly like this one:

In “How to Be a Victor and Not a Victim,” students learn that “people all around the world who have encountered great setbacks have gone on to overcome them, whether it’s poverty, disease, discrimination, or all of it combined.”

That, PragerU Kids says, is the mentality of winners. “Victims on the other hand, don’t believe that personal growth is possible,” the presenter — who, it should be noted here, is Black — instructs the kids

“Or, even worse, don’t believe it’s needed,” he continues. “Victims are often so busy blaming everything and everyone else for their problems that they don’t stop to think about how their own growth can make things better.”

I think this is actually an excellent lesson for the right wing. There is no group on earth that whines more about being victims than they do.

This stuff is going to be taught in schools in Florida. I expect there will be parents who will object. Will they have the same “rights” as the fascist friendly Moms for Liberty?

Trumpism

This is from the horse’s mouth:

There’s a little bit more to it than that, I’m afraid:

It’s the crime AND the cover-up

Going all the way back to Richard Nixon’s inexplicable decision to record himself committing crimes and then getting his secretary Rosemary Woods to take the fall for erasing the most incriminating segment, American political scandals have been defined by a simple credo: it’s not the crime that gets you, it’s the cover-up. For instance, in the Iran Contra affair, Lt Colonel Oliver North enlisted his secretary Fawn Hall to help him shred damaging documents and President Bill Clinton notoriously dispatched his secretary Betty Curie to retrieve gifts that he had given to former White House aide Monica Lewinsky during Independent Counsel Ken Starr’s investigation. Presidential hopeful John Edwards persuaded a campaign worker to take responsibility for fathering the child Edwards had with his mistress while his wife was dying of cancer.

In every case, these attempts to cover up their misdeeds by dispatching an underling to do their dirty work was eventually discovered. But these privileged, powerful leaders just can’t seem to help themselves..

The latest in this long line of such cover-ups is, naturally, Donald Trump. The indictment in the Mar-a-lago classified documents case was for 37 felonies including violations of the Espionage Act and obstruction of justice The Espionage Act charges apply to his willful withholding of national defense information while the obstruction charges apply to his attempts to cover up what he’d done when the federal government asked for them back.

His loyal manservant Walt Nauta was charged along with Trump with five counts of concealing or withholding documents and taking part in a conspiracy to obstruct justice. The government alleges that Nauta moved boxes containing classified documents on Trump’s orders and then lied to federal investigators about it.

On Thursday, another sad Trump employee. Mar-a-lago maintenance man named Carlos de Oliveira found himself named in a superseding indictment of Trump and Nauta. The charges include “Corruptly Altering, Destroying, Mutilating or Concealing a Document, Record, or Other Object,” and “Altering, Destroying, Mutilating, or Concealing an Object.” 

The indictment alleges that the day after investigators had requested “[a]ny and all surveillance records, videos, images, photographs and/or CCTV from internal cameras” at Trump’s beach club, Nauta told de Oliveira to meet with a Mar-a-Lago IT employee. De Oliveira allegedly told the employee that “the boss” wanted the server containing security footage of the storage room where the documents had been held to be “deleted.” The employee replied that he didn’t know how to do that and wasn’t sure he had the “rights” to and he told de Oliveira to discuss it with his supervisor.  It seems he discussed it with the Special Prosecutor.

The indictment has records showing that the maintenance man talked to Trump personally on the phone during this period and CNN reported earlier that de Oliveira was seen in surveillance footage helping Nauta move boxes out of the storage room. 

De Oliveira is also charged with lying to the FBI when he told them he’d never seen anything to do with the boxes when the feds had already obtained the surveillance footage showing Nauta and him moving the boxes all over the place. And although it’s not mentioned in this indictment the prosecutors had some very serious suspicions that de Oliveira had been involved in another attempted cover-up:

https://twitter.com/ktbenner/status/1684686035823874048?s=20

Trump actually did that gambit decades ago during a tax audit, claiming that important records were destroyed in a flood. This time the computer servers were intact and the federal government got them, offering the proof that the records were moved in and out at certain times correlating to the subpoena.

The feds have all kinds of text and phone records, even a Signal chat, that shows that Trump and his accomplices checking to makes sure de Olveira was loyal. CNN reports:

The new superseding indictment alleges that a little more than two weeks after the FBI’s August search of Mar-a-Lago, Nauta called another unidentified employee and said something to the effect of, “someone just wants make sure Carlos is good.” The employee, prosecutors alleged, assured Nauta of De Oliviera’s loyalty.

On the same day, the employee confirmed in a Signal chat group with Nauta and a representative of Trump’s political action committee — whom CNN has previously identified as Susie Wiles — that the maintenance worker was loyal. 

That same day, “Trump called De Oliveira and told De Oliveira that Trump would get De Oliveira an attorney,” the new indictment says.  

Susie Wiles is a very important figure in Trumpworld and it seems odd that she would be involved in loyalty tests for Mar-a-lago maintenance men. But then all of this is very mob-like behavior and she is a top consigliere so I guess it makes sense in that context.

It should be noted that Trump’s additional count pertains to that infamous Iran military document that Trump is on tape showing around to a couple of writers at his Bedminster Golf Club. I know this will come as a shock but it appears that Trump was lying when he said this:

They have the document.

After all this, as if to prove once again that he is completely clueless and without the slightest understanding of the depth of trouble he is in, Trump had the gall to request that he be allowed to discuss the classified documents they seized at Mar-a-lago and Bedminster instead of an official sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF) as anyone else would have to do. He literally wants to keep blabbing about these sensitive documents in the unsecure scene of the crime. Maybe they could arrange to do it in that shower stall where he originally kept them. Needless to say the government is not ok with that.

The funny thing is that this superseding indictment wasn’t even the big Trump indictment story on Thursday. All day long, the media attention was focused on the Washington DC courthouse where the January 6th case’s grand jury met for over 7 hours as Trump’s lawyers were talking to the prosecutors.

According to CNN’s Kaitlin Collins:

Former President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social saying his lawyers met on Thursday to appeal to special counsel Jack Smith that “an indictment would only further destroy the country.”  Trump’s attorneys went into their meeting with the special counsel Thursday not to argue the facts of the case against indicting Trump, but instead with a broader appeal that indicting him would only cause more turmoil in the country’s political environment, two sources familiar with the meeting said. 

Basically, that’s Trump, as is his wont, once again issuing a veiled threat that charging him would be “dangerous” — saying in so many words, “nice little country you have here, be a shame if anything happened to it.” It no doubt fell on deaf ears. The consensus among the legal observers is that the indictment in the January 6th case is imminent and might even be coming down today.

So far, none of the indictments handed down have provoked anything more than some kooks and goofballs milling around courthouses but an indictment in the January 6th case might be different. Or it might not. In any case, he knows that the White House is his ultimate get-out-of-jail-free card and he will do anything to ensure that he wins it. And that’s why he’s in this mess in the first place.

Salon

Burnt toast

What was bad now looks worse

“If even half of it is true, then he’s toast. It’s a very detailed indictment and it’s very damning,” said former US attorney general William Barr in June after special counsel Jack Smith filed the first indictment in the classified documents case against Donald Trump.

On Thursday, Smith issued a superceding indictment with several more charges and a indicted a third co-conspirator: Mar-a-Lago maintenance employee Carlos De Oliveira. The trio are accused of attempting to destroy evidence sought by federal prosecutors. Beside attempting to destroy evidence, De Oliveira stands accused of lying to investigators.

“Never saw anything,” he told the FBI of Trump’s shuffled boxes. “Never saw nothing.” Those statements were false, the indictment alleges. De Oliveira “personally observed and helped move TRUMP’s boxes” containing classified materials.

The Guardian:

“I think this original indictment was engineered to last a thousand years and now this superseding indictment will last an antiquity,” Ty Cobb told CNN. “This is such a tight case, the evidence is so overwhelming.”

[…]

Trump was accused of attempting to destroy evidence and inducing someone else to destroy evidence. He also faces a new count under the Espionage Act, for keeping a document about US plans to attack Iran which he famously discussed on tape.

On his Truth Social platform Thursday night, the report continues, Trump whatabouted Joe Biden’s retention of government documents and called Smith “deranged.”

Ian Millhiser explains at Vox:

In any event, the biggest news in the new Florida indictment is that Trump allegedly instructed members of his staff to destroy surveillance video within his Mar-a-Lago residence, after Trump learned that the DOJ sought that video as part of its investigation into the national security documents kept at Trump’s residence.

The indictment alleges that, after Trump’s lawyers learned that the DOJ would seek the surveillance footage, Trump spoke to two employees: his valet, Walt Nauta, and Carlos De Oliveira, the head of maintenance at Mar-a-Lago. These two employees then instructed a third Trump employee to delete the security footage — although it is not clear if the video was actually deleted. The indictment refers to an “attempt” to destroy security footage.

The indictment does not reveal what was said in many conversations among Nauta, De Oliveira, and Trump, but it does include a few key details linking Trump to the effort to destroy the video footage. At one point, De Oliveira allegedly told the third, unidentified Trump employee that “the boss” wanted the footage deleted. The indictment also alleges that Trump called De Oliveira and told his employee that he would get him a lawyer.

Once again, all are innocent until proved guilty. But what was bad for Trump now looks worse.

Some of MSNBC’s pundits observed that the advantage of Smith’s adding De Oliveira to the case means the jury will see all three men facing some of the same charges for some of the same crimes. This will take their focus off the uniqueness of a former president facing criminal prosecution. Jurors are more likely to see just three Joes accused in the same conspiracy, thus making it near-impossible for them to convict the employees and not “the boss” in what Barr in June described as a “very, very damning” case.

Another possible advantage for Smith is the added pressure for De Oliveira to flip — less likely if Trump is paying his lawyer.

No rotund singer is vocalizing. Yet. Still.

Trump : toast. Goose : cooked.

Ron’s DeFlation

What’s that sound?

Ron is as tone-deaf as his personality is flaccid.

The Lincoln Project’s Rick Wilson does something written on the X site, “Just heard that the Ron DeSantis social media team is unhappy with this ad.”

Also: “Presidential primary campaigns end slowly, then all at once.”

What does it say that the Early Bird Special set voted in this guy? Twice.

Maybe say “woke” more.

Not gonna help.

UPDATE: From Charlie Pierce.

“It has dawned on the Republican donor class that they have bought a dead parrot.”