Just 35% of Republicans say they’re familiar with Trump being indicted for conspiring to overturn the 2020 election. Nearly as many — 34% — say he has not been indicted for that. That’s ridiculous. Have they heard of Jack Smith who Trump called a “dumb son-of-a-bitch” at his rally yesterday? Probably not. They just know generally that Trump is being persecuted like Jesus and it’s all a rigged hoax.
Some do know about his NY case though. And it thrills them apparently:
Hours before Donald Trump was expected to make a virtual address to a Christian advocacy organization that wants to ban all abortions and calls the procedure “child sacrifice,” the former president’s campaign said Monday that he would only give a pre-recorded welcome message lasting less than two minutes — in which he does not say the word “abortion” at all.
Trump was scheduled to make a virtual “address” Monday at an event hosted by the Danbury Institute, an organization that also seeks to ban same-sex marriage and use the Bible to guide public policy, according to its website. The organizers, who promoted Trump as a speaker, noted on X the event sold out.
But in his remarks, obtained first by POLITICO, Trump doesn’t make mention of “abortion.”
“We have to defend religious liberty, free speech, innocent life and the heritage and traditions that built America into the greatest nation in the history of the world,” Trump is expected to say, according to a script of his remarks provided by his campaign. “I know that each of you is protecting those values every day — and I hope we’ll be defending them side by side for the next four years.”
You would think that he’d want to take a victory lap with this group, of all groups. But he’s very nervous about abortion at this point and worries that he’ll be tied to a group that seeks to ban all abortions nationally.
I’m sorry, it’s too late. He is the guy who’s spent the last two years bragging about ending abortion rights and his fatuous claim that sending it to the states was what ‘everyone” always wanted is ridiculous. This one’s on him and he can’t escape it no matter how much he tries to distance himself from the anti-abortion extremists. They may accept his wink and nod but nobody else will.
I can’t say that I’m surprised the Republicans are working hard to undermine and rig the vote in every swing state. I am a little bit surprised they are openly admitting it:
THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION this year will come down to seven states — but there’s one that Donald Trump and his most committed lieutenants see as a blueprint for corrupting future local and national elections: Georgia.
The Peach State is unique — it’s the sole battleground state in which the Republican Party has total control over the levers of power: a trifecta in the state House, Senate, and governorship. Over the past four years, Trump-loving elements of the Georgia GOP have wielded that advantage in a crusade to convert discredited election-conspiracy theories into policies well ahead of Election Day 2024. It is an alarmingly anti-democratic experiment that Trumpland and much of the GOP hope to take national.
“Georgia is our laboratory,” a source close to the former president tells Rolling Stone. “If you can get this up and running in Georgia, you get a road map for other states, maybe the country as a whole.”
[…]
Republican operatives have remade Georgia’s state election board, executive branch, Legislature, and legal ecosystems, all in Donald Trump’s image. Conservatives in the state Assembly have unleashed thousands of voter eligibility challenges on county election boards — an effort that will be turbocharged with a new election law. Lawmakers also worked to limit Raffensperger’s role in overseeing elections, while sapping resources for election administration.
Conservative activists heckle election officials on a regular basis with the conspiracy theories Trump birthed, and an indicted election denier — now the state’s lieutenant governor — pushes Trump’s agenda in the Assembly as he eyes higher office. Trump sits atop this sprawling network, receiving updates on progress from political advisers and other MAGA acolytes.
Lawyers close to Trump are already preparing for the former president to claim fraud in Georgia and challenge the results of the election — even in the event that he wins — just to prove a point about imaginary “fraud” in Democratic areas. “There’s massive fraud, so that should be … solved, no matter who wins in Georgia or any state,” says one lawyer and conservative-movementarian who has discussed the matter with Trump, although they present no evidence to back such claims. “You can’t let the left get away with it just because their cheating did not work.”
He challenged results in places he didn’t win last time. And he certainly did it in 2016 when he formed a voter fraud commission to investigate the election. (They didn’t find anything, of course.)
Trump tells his people that he actually won the popular vote in both 2016 and 2020. I have no doubt that he will say the same thing this time. The Republican party is now institutionalizing his delusional sore-loserism. I don’t know what it will take to change the minds of the sad sack whiners who believe this tripe.
Over the weekend The Washington Post’s Beth Reinhard published an excellent article about one of Donald Trump’s most visionary advisers, a man virtually no one has heard of by the name of Russ Vought. He was a boring GOP bureaucrat who served as director of the Office of Management and Budget from July 2020 until Trump left office after having served as deputy director and acting director before that. Prior to his stint in the White House he was at Heritage Action, the activist arm of the Heritage Foundation and worked as budget director for the Republican Study Group in the congress. In other words, for years he was a numbers cruncher providing far right Republicans with their specious arguments about the government going broke and the need to drastically cut the safety net.
Who knew that such a person also had big ideas about how to destroy the United States government from the inside out? He’s a self-described Christian Nationalist who is spearheading plans for a rapid expansion of executive power under a theory he calls “radical constitutionalism” (which is an oxymoron but it sure sounds snappy.)
He has been working for a conservative network called Center for Renewing America which is full of Trump acolytes, many of whom will likely be in a future Trump administration. That includes Vought himself who is often discussed as a likely Chief of Staff.
Reinhard writes:
“We are living in a post-Constitutional time,” Vought wrote in a seminal 2022 essay, which argued that the left has corrupted the nation’s laws and institutions. Last week, after a jury convicted Trump of falsifying business records, Vought tweeted: “Do not tell me that we are living under the Constitution.”
Vought aims to harness what he calls the “woke and weaponized” bureaucracy that stymied the former president by stocking federal agencies with hardcore disciples who would wage culture wars on abortion and immigration. The proposals championed by Vought and other Trump allies to fundamentally reset the balance of powerwould represent a historic shift — one they see as a needed corrective.
Vought has been named by the Trump RNC as the policy director for the 2024 platform committee. He wrote the chapter on the executive office of the president for Project 2025. He is said to be in charge of planning for the first 180 days of a new Trump administration.
Vought is an Evangelical Christian who has adopted the Trump credo of the ends justify the means. When he was in the White House he saw people who balked at illegal and unethical activity as squishes and whenever he could his office was helping Trump do end runs around the law and regulations, from re-appropriating funds for his border wall to helping him to blackmail the Ukrainian president in exchange for slandering Joe Biden, which got Trump impeached. He’s the one who came up with the notorious Schedule F, the plan to eliminate the civil service and replace government employees with Trump lackeys. They didn’t have time to fully implement it in Trump’s first term but you can bet they’ll get it done asap if he wins in November,
Trump’s only agenda is to prove he’s not a loser, keep himself out of jail and wreak revenge on his enemies. Whatever else they have planned for his second term is fine with him and Vought has plans, big ones. His “radical constitutionalism” is an extreme reinterpretation of what the American system and rule of law stand for.
For instance, according to Reinhard, he seeks to redefine immigration as an “invasion” which would allow the president to invoke wartime powers. He’s on the same page as Trump with respect to mass deportation because he doesn’t believe that most immigrants can understand America’s Judeo-Christian worldview. He calls this “rethinking the legal paradigms that have confined our ability to return to the original Constitution.”
He is one of the primary influences in right wing circles pushing hard to eliminate any independence of agencies in the executive branch starting with the Justice Department. On a recent podcast he backed Trump’s call to prosecute Trump’s enemies saying, “it can’t just be hearings, it has to be investigations, an army of investigators that lead to firm convictions.” He supports invoking the Insurrection Act, banning medical abortions and implementing policies to boost the birthrate. (Yes, he’s one of those guys too.) In other words he is an authoritarian nightmare.
Whenever I read about extremists like Vought and others who are plotting to overturn the Constitution, like so many others, I can’t help but think about 1930s Germany. The parallels aren’t perfect but they are way too close for comfort. The Nazi Big Lie was about the supposed “stab in the back” that led ordinary Germans to buy into the idea that Germany didn’t actually lose WWI but were instead betrayed by Jews, Marxists, democrats, and internationalists. Trump’s Big Lie is that he didn’t lose the election (so typically all about him) but it’s had the same motivating effect on his followers.
In both cases, there is a fairly pathetic attempt to overthrow of the government and the political establishment subsequently fails to take the legal steps available to prevent them from making a comeback. This facilitates the growth of an authoritarian movement, infused with racism and grievance and although this movement never achieves a majority in the country over time its leaders learn that there are better ways of achieving its goals by exploiting weaknesses in the system which had previously gone undiscovered.
This form of revolution doesn’t rely on violent overthrow but it does require intimidation and threats of violence against political enemies. And it cannot succeed without the enabling and cooperation of establishment politicians and officials who either believe they can control the extremists in their midst or simply sign on for their own ambition uncaring of the consequences.
Vought is in the latter category, an opportunist who sees Donald Trump as the ticket to a Christian Nationalist America. Whether he is a MAGA true believer is immaterial. He’s an efficient bureaucrat, trained in the right wing fever swamps who knows how to get things done. And what he wants to do is horrifying.
Steve Benen offers this recollection. I’d already forgotten:
In 2017, on the 4th of July, NPR published a series of tweets with the text of the Declaration of Independence. It seemed like a simple, patriotic gesture to help celebrate our Independence Day. A surprising number of Republicans didn’t quite see it that way.
The more NPR published portions of the Declaration of Independence, the more rank-and-file conservatives — who apparently didn’t recognize the words of the document — assumed that the media outlet was publishing anti-Trump “propaganda.”
“A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people,” one tweet read, sparking particular outrage from the right, who assumed the missive was directed at the then-Republican president.
It was an early reminder, just six months into Donald Trump’s term, that many of his followers, when confronted with core American principles, would simply assume they were anti-Trump criticisms.
Republicans reacted similarly to Joe Biden’s remarks at the 80th D-Day anniversary:
Republican Sen. Rick Scott of Florida called the remarks “disgusting.” A Fox Business host also accused the Democrat of “taking veiled shots” at Trump. As New York magazine’s Jon Chait noted, some other prominent voices from conservative media had similar reactions.
That’s because no matter how much red, white and blue merch they own, Cult of Trump supplicants do not believe in core American principles. In spirit, they are royalists not colonists. If not outright idolaters.
Perhaps this clip from the chair of the Nevada Republican Party is poor phrasing. Perhaps it is a Freudian slip. But call a political rally worship?
Rep. Marge Greene of Georgia goes a step further. She likens her worship of Jesus to her fealty to Donald Trump.
I was raised Catholic. A criticism Protestant fundamentalists always raise is that with all of Catholics’ statues and saints, the line between “venerating” saints (as the catechism would have it) and worshipping them and their images is uncomfortingly fine (Mrs. O’Donnell joke).
Naturally, Trump cultists seem to have no such uneasiness about their own affections toward their orange-caked savior.
It is clear from what transpired on Jan. 6, 2021; and from the actions of GOP-controlled legislatures across the country to ignore the will of the people; and from MAGA Republican efforts to place Trump above the laws of men; and from the shameless declarations of Christian nationalists to transform the U.S. into a theocracy; and from anti-abortion activists’ intentions to reduce women to birthing vessels; that they have, in biblical terms, sold their American birthright for a mess of Trumpage.
Digby has a post prepped for later today on Republican sore-loserism in Georgia (based on a Rolling Stone piece). It’s the sort of tactic with which we are well familiar next door in North Carolina. It’s simply this: If Republicans lose under established election rules, change the rules.
Judd Legum spotlights the latest Republican effort in North Carolina to tip the governor’s race in favor of Lt. Gov. Mark “Choking on my own blood” Robinson, the freaky Christian nationalist and conspiracy theorist. He’s trailing in fundraising behind the state’s Attorney General Josh Stein (D).
“The most recent campaign finance reports show that Stein has raised over $19 million, with $12.7 million cash on hand,” Legum begins. “Robinson, however, has raised less than $11 million and has $4.5 million in cash.”
Under existing North Carolina campaign finance law, corporations and labor unions cannot contribute directly or indirectly to state campaigns or committees. This prevents the main national fundraising vehicles for gubernatorial campaigns — the Democratic Governors Association (DGA) and the Republican Governors Association (RGA) — from donating to North Carolina political committees. These committees, known as 527s, accept unlimited contributions from corporations and individuals.
The changes proposed by North Carolina Republicans would allow the RGA and the DGA (or any other 527) to donate unlimited amounts to any “[s]tate, district, or county executive committee of any political party or an affiliated party committee.” Should these changes become law, the only requirement is that the 527s must create two “accounts”—one accepting corporate money and another accepting individual donations in any amount. The Republican proposal would allow the 527s to donate unlimited amounts to North Carolina committees from the account that accepts individual donations.
Bob Hall, a veteran North Carolina campaign finance expert, explained that the new rules would allow “wealthy individuals with new ways to give tens (or even hundreds) of thousands of dollars to support a North Carolina candidate without their name being identified with the donation.”
Didn’t see that coming, didja?
Anonymity is important to deep-pocketed donors committed to maintaining Republican control but who don’t want their fingerprints on money supporting Mr. “It’s not your body anymore.”
In June 2021, for example, Robinson called LGBTQ people “filth” and said exposure to LGBTQ people and issues in schools was child abuse. In a sermon later that year, Robinson said “straight” couples were “superior” to same-sex couples and compared being gay to “what the cows leave behind.” Robinson has also called LGBTQ people “devil-worshiping child molesters”
On Facebook, Robinson repeatedly minimized the atrocities of Nazi Germany and the Holocaust. “I am so sick of seeing and hearing people STILL talk about Nazis and Hitler and how evil and manipulative they were,” Robinson wrote on Facebook in 2017. He accused unknown forces of “pushing this Nazi boogeyman narrative all these years.”
In 2019, Robinson said that abortion rights were “not about protecting the lives of mothers” but “about killing the child because you weren’t responsible enough to keep your skirt down.” Robinson said women choose to have an abortion so that they can keep living “on easy street” and “keep running to the club every Friday night.” He favors an abortion ban from the moment of conception.
“Abortion in this country is not about protecting the lives of mothers,” Robinson says in the clip used in the ad. “It is about killing the child because you weren’t responsible enough to keep your skirt down.”
Gerrymandering, of course, is an age-old tradition in which both major parties partake to gain advantage. Gotta credit Republicans for their 2010 REDMAP program to flip legislatures all over the place ahead of 2011 redicstricting. But since the election of the first Black president, they’ve really taken their game to the next level (or two) in states David Pepper calls “Laboratories of Autocracy.”
Democrats have been playing Whac-A-Mole ever since against some deviously clever efforts to squeeze every advantage out of existing rules and rule tweaks. From strategically starving blue cities of revenue to purging voter rolls to erecting barriers to voter registration to making voting itself harder to Thomas Hofeller’s computer-aided gerrymandering to trying to rig the 2020 census, the GOP has pulled out all the stops. Lest we forget, they instigated a violent insurrection after losing the 2020 presidential election. We have to implement these changes, Republicans insist, to restore public confidence in election integrity (their buzzword) that they’ve spent relentless decades undermining.
Dramatically altering North Carolina’s campaign finance rules is just another clever tweak. Watch for that mole to pop up its head in your Republican-controlled state.
Biden’s new immigration order sucks. I’m sorry, it does. I know it’s a big election issue for a lot of people, including Democrats, and they’re trying to mitigate any erosion of their voting coalition. But the reality is that border crossings are way down over the last 6 months and it’s really overkill.
Having said that, they are apparently also on the verge of offering up something very positive on immigration:
Looking to shore up Latino votes in Nevada and Arizona for his reelection campaign, President Joe Biden is on the verge of soon following up last week’s executive action aimed at curbing border crossings with another move focused on providing legal status for long-term undocumented immigrants who are married to American citizens.
Though final details have not been decided, officials are reviewing an existing legal authority known as “parole in place” that would shield select undocumented immigrants from deportation and allow them to work legally in the country as they seek citizenship. The orders have not yet been presented to Biden himself for review.
Polling reviewed by top aides in the White House and the president’s reelection headquarters are helping seal the deal.
For Biden in Arizona, “Everything is on the margins, right?” said Democratic Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly. “My sense is it should help.”
Estimates put the number of people who could be directly affected at 750,000 to 800,000, with a reverberating effect among spouses, children, extended family and friends — and predominantly Latinos. That’s millions of potential votes in just Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia. Those are all battleground states, all home to many Latinos and all looking likely to be decided in November by slivers of the electorate.
“We have lost the narrative on the border, and so we need to start winning it back,” said one person involved in the discussions of why Biden started with the executive action tightening asylum rules last week.
But “Latino voters in particular are extremely enthusiastic about seeing something done to help people they know. It is either a direct relative or friend, someone they work with,” that person argued. “It is such a powerful signal to these communities that you care about them, and you understand what’s happening there.”
This could amount to the federal government’s biggest relief program since the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. That program, which allowed undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children to live and work in the country, was announced mid-June of Obama’s own reelection year in 2012.
This sounds like a good policy and also smart electorally. I’m not sure if it will make up for the rather draconian new rules on asylum but it’s good on its own terms.
The fact is that with full employment the U.S. needs immigrant labor more than ever. People who are freaking out over it are being very short-sighted. But what else is new?
This podcast with the New Yorker’s Susan Glasser, Jane Mayer and former GOP strategist Sarah Longwell was quite fascinating. Longwell is all over the media sharing the information about the focus groups she holds with swing voters. In this, though, she shares her advice for the Democrats about how to reach them and I thought it was excellent.
The one piece of advice that really sounds smart to me is the idea that if Biden’s big weakness is his age, they should roll out all the surrogates from around the country, like Governors Whitmer, Newsom, Shapiro etc to show there is a strong Democratic bench that’s young and vital. It reflects on the party rather than Biden but its useful in any case. And she says they should go to lengths to show that he has young an vital people all around him. She didn’t advise it, but I wondered if they should show some cabinet meetings. Obviously, they don’t have to do it like Trump did with all the sycophants making fools of themselves over Dear Leader. But it might be useful for the public to see the people in the administration who back Biden up day to day.
I’m sure that sticks in Biden’s craw but he should do it anyway. People just need to be reminded that the presidency is more than just one person and they can count on Biden’s excellent personnel choices in important roles almost all of whom are still in the jobs for which they were hired, unlike the massive turnover in Trump’s term.
I think this makes sense. Democratic surrogates should be fanning out everywhere, all the time, making the case. Nothing is more important.