Skip to content

Month: March 2025

Friday Night Soother

Spring has sprung!

Those are all videos from the best zoo in the world, the San Diego Zoo. If you ever get a chance to see it, as well as the Animal Safari, do it. It’s a beautiful zoo and the animals are amazing. I went there right as it opened on one spring day a few years back and was just walking along the path and coming toward me were some people with four animals on leashes. As we got closer I could see that it was two cheetahs with their companion Golden Retrievers! They veered off down another path before we met but just being in such close proximity was magical.

Feeling The AOC Burn

What’s that about?

That was in response to this snotty jibe:

The MAGA Real Americans who are so very hurt by the elites who look down on them ecstatically cheered this nasty comment. But then I suppose “waitress” doesn’t really qualify as working class since it is by definition a woman’s job.

*You do have to love the conceit that they are the ones operating from reason and logic. Lol!

Here’s the rest of AOC’s comment on this matter at a huge rally yesterday in Las Vegas.

I think I might have to make some Marxaritas tonight. Yum.

A Little Nauseous Hopium For The Weekend

Robert Reich wrote a piece today in which he says he’s “nauseously optimistic” a phrase I can relate to. There is no such thing as pure optimism anymore. Whenever I see a little ray of light now, my stomach starts churning because I don’t want to get my hopes up.

Reich’s little bit of optimist comes from the fact that the courts, so far, have been coming through.

All told, more than 120 Trump-Musk moves are now being reviewed by federal courts. So far, courts have ruled against the duo in the vast majority of these.

This is a constraint on Trump only if he feels bound by the rulings, of course — which raises the key question: Will Trump obey the rulings?

At least for now, the answer seems to be yes. Even as his war on the judiciary hits new heights, Trump vowed this week that he has never, and will never, defy the courts.

In a Tuesday interview with Laura Ingraham on Fox News, Trump bluntly told the MAGA faithful that “you can’t” ignore the rulings of the judicial branch.

Although Trump blustered and raged during the interview, he was clear about this. “I never did defy a court order,” he repeatedly said. Pressed by Ingraham to say if he might defy a court order in the future, he said: “No, you can’t do that.”

Despite calls from MAGA supporters for radical action against the judiciary, Trump seems to have concluded, at least for now, that he will not defy the courts.

That was not the first time he’s answered that so clearly. (I wrote about it here.)

“I always abide by the courts and then I’ll have to appeal it. But then what he’s done is he’s slowed down momentum. And it gives crooked people more time to cover up the books. The answer is I always abide by the courts, always abide by them. And we’ll appeal. But appeals take a long time.”

I thought at the time (about 6 weeks ago) that this might be his way of keeping Musk at arms length but now I’m not so sure. Reich has another idea that might make more sense.

The answer, I think, is that although Trump doesn’t pay attention to opinion pieces in The New York Times or The Washington Post (and certainly not this Substack), he does pay attention to opinion pieces in the Rupert Murdoch-owned press — specifically in the New York Post and The Wall Street Journal.

Their opinions have been uniformly against Trump defying the courts.

A sampling: “Sorry, Elon: Even deporting illegal gangbangers must heed the rule of law” (NY Post editorial board, 3/16) … “He campaigned on deporting gang members, but he can’t defy court orders” (WSJ editorial board, 3/17) … “Chief Justice Roberts Speaks Up for the Judiciary” (WSJ editorial board, 3/18) … “Trump, don’t heed the dangerous urge to attack the rule of law” (Isaac Schorr, NY Post, 3/18).

In other words, Murdoch is sending Trump a clear warning: If you take on the judiciary, you’re on your own.

We can’t trust anything Trump says so it’s probably best not to try and figure it out when he means something and when he doesn’t. And who really knows what Murdoch is doing? But as Reich says:

At most, it’s a reason for a modest bit of nauseous optimism, at the end of another difficult week.

I’ll take it.

Drawn With A Ruler

“You know, you have that artificial line because it is straight artificial and look like it was drawn by a ruler. I don’t mean a ruler like a king but a ruler like a ruler this way. It is just an artificial line that was drawn in the sand. In the ice. You add that to this country and what a beautiful landmass anywhere in the world. It was cut off for whatever reason. It would be great.”

Don’t tell him about Colorado…

When I say Canada should be a state I really mean that.

I believe he does. And he’s doubling down every day. He wants the big “land mass” because it will look great on a map. And now he says they don’t “have the cards.”

You’ll recall that’s what he said about Ukraine…

Considering what he’s doing right now I don’t think it’s wise to chalk up this talk to “Trump just being Trump” unless you recognize that Trump being Trump means that he’s just batshit enough to do something truly crazy.

Geniuses

If the NY Times is making this up, why would there be a hunt for leakers?

By the way, the Wall St Journal confirmed the story. Apparently it forced the Pentagon to back off and Musk didn’t get his briefing.

But why would he be getting such briefings in the first place?

Fear Leader In Drones

The drone show is stupid but ok. It’s what it said about his that makes it so cringe.

I’m so embarrassed for my country.

Why Do They Hate DEI So Much?

I think we all know, don’t we?

Whatever happened to to Critical Race Theory, also known by its three letter acronym, CRT? If you’ll recall it was the cause celebre of the 2021 Virginia Governor’s race which had all the DC tongues wagging about the resurgence of the right wing culture war. “Moms for Liberty” which grew out of the anti-mask, anti vax crusades of the pandemic quickly adopted it as their crusade and was given credit for Glenn Youngkin’s win that year. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis made it one of the primary targets of his “anti-woke” campaign for re-election in 2022 and rode it hard during his presidential run the next year.

The whole movement against CRT was the brainchild of a right wing activist by the name of Christopher Rufo who single-handedly pushed the idea into the mainstream in 2020, during the pandemic. He had been making some waves about it for a while and caught the attention of Tucker Carlson, then Fox News’ top talent. He appeared on his show and made a big splash with this comment:

“Conservatives need to wake up. This is an existential threat to the United States. And the bureaucracy, even under Trump, is being weaponized against core American values. And I’d like to make it explicit: The President and the White House—it’s within their authority to immediately issue an executive order to abolish critical-race-theory training from the federal government. And I call on the President to immediately issue this executive order—to stamp out this destructive, divisive, pseudoscientific ideology.”

Most people had no idea what it was but the Republican base was very excited at the chance to attack anything that sounded like a discussion of racism. Some school districts banned the teaching of CRT which was a very easy thing to do since schools weren’t teaching it in the first place. (It was a graduate school topic that never had any application to elementary and high school curriculum.) There was a spate of book banning and cancellations of African American history classes, particularly in Florida where Desantis was making his bones as a MAGA-style warrior and brought Rufo in as an adviser. But after the GOP defeat of 2022 and DeSantis’s spectacular flameout in the presidential race, CRT faded as a right wing boogeyman.

It had been replaced by a new three letter enemy, DEI, which stands for Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. It too was the brainchild of Rufo and thanks to the disastrous restoration of Donald Trump to the White House, we are watching it being turned into policy on a national scale.

DEI is basically a concept that’s been around since the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which made discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin illegal in employment. Over the decades as people began to fully recognize that the historic marginalization of those groups required greater effort to address that discrimination, the various institutions in society from corporations to academia to government put policies in place to ensure they had a fair shot. It eventually included ethnic, religious and LGBTQ+ communities and became part of the American workplace.

It was in 2020 when the George Floyd protests and the Black Lives Matter movement galvanized the whole planet and precipitated efforts to ramp up DEI programs across society that the backlash began in earnest. I’m sure right wingers had hated it forever, for obvious reasons, and there were plenty of other people who felt that some of it was overkill, fuelling the larger “anti-woke” fervor that had the MAGA base up in arms over everything from kitty litter in the schools to Mr. Potatohead to rainbow onesies at Target.

Trump explicitly ran on ending DEI throughout his campaign much as he had run against “common core” in his first campaign but he had no real idea what it was. It got an applause line from the MAGA faithful and that’s always good enough for him. But there are many people around him who do know what it is, namely the Project 2025 authors who explicitly called for a variety of terms to be deleted from “from every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists” as well as the dismantling of every DEI program that exists in the government.

He’s doing it exactly as they instructed. All the DEI programs have been cancelled and the people running them have been fired. Scientific research is being strangled by orders to the NIH and CDC as well as all University grantees to eliminate any research focused on diverse populations (which includes “women.”) Trump even blamed DEI for the fatal plane crash in Washington DC in February suggesting that the FAA had hired unqualified air traffic controllers. The EEOC and the Department of Justice are going after law firms, universities and private companies demanding they account for their DEI programs, suggesting they are guilty of discriminatory hiring practices. It is a full court press across all of society.

If you want to know the real motivation for all this you need to look no further than what’s been going on at the Pentagon over the last couple of weeks. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made it quite clear before he was nominated that he believes racial minorities, women and LGBTQ members of the military are inferior. His first step upon taking the job was to have Trump fire the Black Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (whom he had called “DEI” earlier) replacing him with a white man and the two top women officers leaving the military without a single woman in a four-star general or admiral leadership position.

The Pentagon web sites recognizing the contributions of racial minorities such as the Tuskegee Airmen and the Navajo Code talkers, as well as all the women pilots going all the way back to WWII, were taken down with urls that distinctly said “DEI.” They removed all the references to the same at the website of Arlington National Cemetery.

The Pentagon restored some of the web sites as they’ve caused public outcry but many that aren’t famous will probably go unnoticed. But even if they put them all back, we can see the intention. The Pentagon spokesman said “we salute them for their strong and in many cases heroic service to our country, full stop. We do not view or highlight them through the prism of immutable characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, or sex.”

In other words, they do not believe that the stories of these particular patriots having overcome the discrimination and adversity that led to them to being the “firsts” and the “few” are important. In fact, they want to erase all traces of that discrimination and adversity altogether and pretend it never happened. They want to pretend that the world is a meritocracy where white men just happen to be the best. DEI says that’s not true and they are not going to stand for it.

The State Department Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Darren Beattie said it most plainly in a post on twitter a while back: “Competent white men must be put in charge if you want things to work. Unfortunately, our entire national ideology is predicated on coddling the feelings of women and minorities, and demoralizing competent white men.”

That’s what the fight against DEI is all about. And in just two months, Trump and his henchmen have gotten a vast swathe of American society scrambling to ensure that no one will ever say otherwise again.

Salon

2024 Is STILL Not Over

NC Democrats are still fighting attacks on their win

I’ve got somewhere to be in a few minutes, so please excuse me. The NC Appeals Court hearing on the Griffin challenge is this morning at 9:45 a.m.:

Three judges on the state Court of Appeals will hear arguments on Friday in Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin’s effort to throw out votes so he can win a seat on the Supreme Court. 

Griffin, himself an appeals court judge, is suing the state Board of Elections in his attempt to toss out more than 60,000 votes he claims were illegally cast. Griffin is seeking to unseat Democratic incumbent Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs. Riggs is ahead by 734 votes, a lead that has been affirmed in two recounts.

Etc.

Catch you tomorrow.

* * * * *

Have you fought the coup today?

National Day of Action, Saturday, April 5
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions

Weak To The Point Of Nonexistence

Resurrecting Bush II’s “extraordinary rendition”

Slate reports that details are now emerging about the “evidence” the Trump administration used to round up and incarcerate 250 Venezuelans in a notorious Salvadoran supermax prison.

Trump 2.0’s PR strategy behind this roundup is to claim — without providing evidence or even deportees names — that each and every one is a violent terrorist present on U.S. soil illegally, trust us. And then dare human rights activists to defend not deporting the supposed threats to Americans’ safety. Except it’s the extrajudicial deportation of #Donalds_Desaparecidos that’s at issue.

Trump 2.0 has taken an illegal page from the Bush II administration’s “extraordinary rendition” campaign 20 years ago. As a result of a “a paper-thin evidential chain,” Canadian engineer, Maher Arar, endured 10 months of beatings in Syria after being detained while changing planes at JFK airport. He was later released without charge. Another Canadian, Ahmad Abou El-Maati, named Arar after enduring two years of torture in Syria over allegations of al-Qaida connections. According to the Guardian newspaper, El Maati eventually “reeled off the names of everyone he knew in Montreal,” including Arar. (I wrote an op-ed on this at the time.)

Trump 2.0 claims that the Venezuelans it rendered to El Salvador “are terrorists by virtue of their alleged membership in the Tren de Aragua gang,” but as with the kidnapping the U.S. did during Bush’s “global war on terror” (GWOT), “evidence of this affiliation is weak to the point of nonexistence.”

Slate provides examples:

Consider Jerce Reyes Barrios, one victim of the deportations: a professional soccer player who had fled Venezuela after protesting against dictator Nicolás Maduro and was living peacefully in the U.S. until the government snatched him up and deported him to El Salvador. Linette Tobin, Barrios’ attorney, submitted a declaration in federal court that detailed the disturbing reasons why her client was targeted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. After entering the U.S. last year, Barrios was scheduled to have an asylum hearing in April. But on Saturday, he was arrested and held at a San Diego detention facility after ICE agents accused him of being a member of Tren de Aragua, the Venezuelan gang that President Donald Trump has been fixated on to fulfill his mass-deportation plan.

ICE’s accusations were based on two things. First, Barrios has a tattoo on his arm of a crown sitting atop a soccer ball that, federal immigration authorities allege, “is proof of gang membership.” In reality, Tobin wrote, the tattoo was inspired by the Real Madrid soccer team, which is also circular in shape and features a crown. Second, Barrios posted a photo of himself on social media in which he’s gesturing with both hands, with his middle fingers down. This, federal agents claimed, was also proof of gang membership—except that Barrios’ hand gesture actually means “I love you” in sign language and is also commonly used as a symbol of rock ’n’ roll.

In the second episode of Netflix’s “Adolescence,” the son of an English detective investigating a girl’s murder pulls him aside to warn him that his embarrassing misreading of emojis in social media posts has him completely misunderstanding the case he’s building. Dad simply has no clue how online youth code works. Neither do ICE’s flunkies regarding tattoos. Nor are they inclined to care. Not when the boss’ mandate is deport ’em all, let El Salvador sort ’em out.

Trump 2.0 has adopted strategies for avoiding judicial review of its disappearing any non-citizens it deems undesirable. They will get to you soon enough.

Slate ponders what’s changed:

It’s an open question whether ICE targeted these men because of their tattoos or whether agents detained them first, then fabricated a pretext later. Those details will hopefully be sorted out when lawyers for the victims can interrogate those who perpetrated this scheme. What matters most now is that judges have an opportunity to review the alleged evidence, in conjunction with the relevant law, and end this persecution before its test run is expanded into a full-blown suspension of all immigrants’ constitutional rights.

And yours.

* * * * *

Have you fought the coup today?

National Day of Action, Saturday, April 5
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions

Today’s Crazy

Another little detail from Trump’s visit to the Kennedy Center:

[I]n a private discussion at the start of a meeting of the center’s board on Monday, Mr. Trump offered something he usually steers away from in bigger settings: a personal anecdote about his childhood.

He told the assembled board members that in his youth he had shown special abilities in music after taking aptitude tests ordered by his parents, according to three participants in the meeting.

He could pick out notes on the piano, he told the board members, some of whom he’s known for years and others who are relatively new to him. But the president said that his father, Fred Trump, was not pleased by his musical abilities, according to the participants, and that he had never developed his talent. One person in the room said Mr. Trump appeared to be joking about his father.

“I have a high aptitude for music,” he said at one point, according to people at the meeting. “Can you believe that?”

“That’s why I love music,” he added.

He has a great aptitude for epidemiology too. Everyone said so. Because his Uncle taught at MIT, dontcha know.

I’ve been struggling with where I’ve heard this piano thing before and I finally remembered. It’s from “Pride and Prejudice” the scene in Lady Catherine De Bourgh’s drawing room:

“Of music! Then pray speak aloud. It is of all subjects my delight. I must have my share in the conversation, if you are speaking of music. There are few people in England, I suppose, who have more true enjoyment of music than myself, or a better natural taste. If I had ever learnt, I should have been a great proficient.”

Here’s the movie version:

Here’s the countrified Mr. Collins, Lee Greenwood:

“He’s absolutely very creative and very artistic,” Mr. Greenwood said. “I do not doubt that he has a great ear for music.”

The following goes way beyond Catherine De Bourgh. It’s full Kim Jong Un:

Asked about the anecdote, Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, did not directly address it but said that the president “is a virtuoso and his musical choices represent a brilliant palette of vibrant colors when others often paint in pale pastels.” Mr. Cheung said that, given Mr. Trump’s roles as president and Kennedy Center chair, “there is nobody more uniquely qualified to bring this country, and its rich history of the arts, back to prominence.”

Yeah, he’s a musical genius. And a simply fabulous dancer: