Skip to content

Month: May 2025

Don’t Tell The Red States

But their representatives want to screw them Hard.

They swore up and down that they weren’t touching Medicaid. Yet here we are:

House Republicans released the first draft of their legislation cutting Medicaid to help pay for $5 trillion of tax cuts in what President Donald Trump calls the “big, beautiful bill” at the center of his domestic policy agenda.

The legislation would impose new limits on Medicaid benefits to unemployed adults and require more frequent eligibility checks as part of a reform package that would save $715 billion on federal health spending over a decade, according to a preliminary analysis by the Congressional Budget Office.

“When so many Americans who are truly in need rely on Medicaid for life-saving services, Washington can’t afford to undermine the program further by subsidizing capable adults who choose not to work,” House Energy and Commerce Committee Chair Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.) said in a Wall Street Journal op-ed accompanying the bill release.

The legislation, which also includes changes to health insurance rules under the Affordable Care Act, would result in 8.6 million fewer Americans having health care coverage a decade from now, per the CBO analysis. Republican committee aides disputed the CBO analysis but did not provide a separate estimate of the bill’s impacts.

The Medicaid changes are a crucial part of a broader bill that will boost border security and defense spending while permanently entrenching temporary tax cuts Trump enacted in his first term. Republican leaders hope to offset part of the cost of the tax cuts, which especially benefit higher income Americans, through lower spending on health care and food benefits for lower earners.

The Freedom Caucus freaks are screaming that it’s not enough. The swing state shape shifters are wringing their hands. There’s so much in this bill that’s terrible I wonder if they’ll be able to do anything but raise the debt ceiling and pass another supplemental. Trump’s demand for one Big Beautiful Bill (he forced them to actually name it that) has them in a corner.

Dave Dayen at The American Prospect writes:

I said back then that one-bill agendas tended to fail, because they offer plentiful targets for opposition and maddening coalitional choices that typically leave everyone bruised and upset. “Each day without a legislative accomplishment will both grate on the president and amp up the discord,” I wrote. “The one-bill strategy heightens the possibility of getting nothing done, or at least the possibility of scaling back ambitions and only getting a fraction passed.”

Fortunately, Republicans didn’t listen to me. And now they are in their familiar stage of recriminations, anger, and desperation, which is already leading to scaling back ambitions and only getting a fraction passed. […]

The truly incredible thing now being whispered in the Capitol is that they give up on the big beautiful bill entirely, and try just to extend the Trump tax cuts in a deal with Democrats at the end of the year. To go back to something else I wrote, this one in February, that Republicans would fail to get together on tax cuts, something so simple and fundamental to their perspective, is both unthinkable yet totally predictable. This is a caucus with no legislative accomplishments or track record, with huge differences of opinion, and with an allergy to compromise. Which exactly explains where we are today.

Read the whole thing to get a fuller picture of the dynamics. I’ll be surprised if they can get anything done.

Dominance Theater

Trump threatens. Then he backs down.

Donald Trump isn’t a real successful businessman. He’s a reality show facsimile. New Yorkers knew that about him even before Mark Burnett invented him for “The Apprentice.”

What Trump is running out of the Oval Office is the world’s most blatantly obvious and lucative grift. One thing that is true about Trump besides his being a con man: he’s not a real tough guy either.

Jonathan Chait discusses how predictably Trump backs down from his threats when confronted or ignored. His bluster is all for show, as phony as his gilt and his “deals”:

When President Donald Trump launched his trade war on the world, he issued a stern warning: “Do not retaliate and you will be rewarded.” China ignored the warning. It was rewarded anyway. This morning, Trump largely suspended his trade war in return for nothing but promises of ongoing discussions. There is a lesson here for everybody Trump threatens, whether countries or businesses or universities.

The unveiling of the Trump global tariff regime was accompanied by a distinct form of dominance theater. The president and his gang assured his targets that if they submitted to his tariffs, he would repay their compliance. Any country that dared defy him would suffer terribly.

Uh-huh. Those who bought the show found that making deals was problematic with a man who doesn’t understand how trade works.

China, however, defied the threats and retaliated anyway. Guess what?

Trump held out for one month before backing down. Under the new 90-day agreement, tariffs on Chinese goods will come down to 30 percent; China’s tariffs on American goods will likewise decline to 10 percent. “The consensus from both delegations is that neither side wanted a decoupling,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced at a press conference in Geneva, as if the whole thing had been one big misunderstanding. The decades of China allegedly “ripping off” the United States were apparently forgotten, along with China’s insolence in retaliating and the supposed need for the U.S. to reduce its reliance on Chinese imports. The administration isn’t even pretending that it forced China to pay any special price for its defiance. It is memory-holing the entire “do not retaliate” episode and moving on as if the point this whole time was to get along better with Beijing.

As an exercise in trade policy, this makes no sense. But to treat Trump’s behavior as if it were narrowly tailored to the objective of reordering global trade misses the symbolic role it plays. Trump is performing a character, the presidential version of the boss he played in The Apprentice, sitting in a plush leather chair doling out justice to quavering supplicants.

The verdict? Ignore him and Mr. Tough Guy backs down. He’s not a real world leader. The reality-show president is playing one for the cameras.

Trump is a classic bully who craves submission and fears conflict. His fervent supporters want him to be Michael Corleone, but he’s more like Biff Tannen. Standing up to Trump does not mean that you win. But giving in guarantees that you lose.

Is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
— from “Camarillo Brillo” by Frank Zappa and The Mothers of Invention

* * * * *

Have you fought dictatorship today?

The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Group W Backbench

That’s my congressman

U.S. Congressman Chuck Edwards

Accounts differ, but it appears my Republican congressman, Chuck Edwards, smacked an unidentified audience member with a clipboard on his way out of a Rotary District 7670 conference after his speech Saturday night in Asheville. The man called the police.

Charlotte Observer:

Rotary clubs are intended not to be partisan or sectarian. So Guy Gooder, the district’s community service project chair and a corporate sponsor of the event, said he had concerns as soon as he learned Edwards was a speaker, but he didn’t expect what he witnessed Saturday night.

Gooder, a graphic designer from Franklin, said Edwards was invited to speak about Helene relief and recovery, as Buncombe County Board of Commissioner Chairwoman Amanda Edwards — who is not related — had done the night before. He said she stayed on script. Edwards did not.

Gooder said Edwards used his speech to defend President Donald Trump’s administration, including on tariffs and cuts to federal agencies.

Gooder said while Edwards said he might try to restore funding to the State Department to help the Rotarians’ cause of polio eradication, he also spent his speech “insulting” the federal agencies the Rotarians work with most closely.

Edwards’s tone did not go over well with some Rotarians.

“He spent 30 minutes basically insulting the Rotarians’ intelligence in his speech,” Gooder said. “He insulted many of the programs that we partner with, agencies like the State Department, and the WHO, which is polio eradication, insulted those departments, talked about maybe we can get some funding back to the State Department for polio, so our efforts can continue.”

Gooder, a critic of Trump who is registered as an unaffiliated voter, serves on the Franklin Tourism Development Authority board. Gooder stresses the importance of Rotarians to check their views on politics at the door when they walk into Rotarian events.

Gooder told McClatchy he did not witness the encounter. But after 30 minutes of bashing Rotary’s partners, Gooder said, “they’re probably going to insult you back.” Someone did as Edwards exited down the center aisle between the tables.

TPM & The Assembly have more:

“He got into an argument at one of the tables with another Rotarian and Chuck got upset and hit the guy with a binder and said ‘love you man’ as he walked out,” said a Rotarian, who requested anonymity so as not to jeopardize his relationship with the organization.

[…]

The man exchanged words with Edwards after the congressman delivered his remarks, Gooder said. “Chuck stops and kind of bends over, kind of in-his-face type of stuff,” Gooder told McClatchy, saying Edwards “hit the guy with his clipboard” while the man was still seated. According to Gooder, the two men then exited the conference room. 

Neither Edwards’ D.C. office nor his district office responded to our requests for comment as of Monday night.

McClatchy reported on early accounts of the incident on Sunday, including a statement from Edwards claiming he had “refused to engage with an intoxicated man that was cursing” after his speech. 

There seems to be no video of the exchanges.

In a text message, Rotary District 7670’s Governor Connie Molland said it was her understanding the Buncombe County District Attorney’s Office decided “there was not enough probable cause and that they were dropping the investigation… It was a pretty vague situation.” 

As I observed at Edwards’s Asheville town hall event in March, Edwards seems to enjoy trolling his constituents on Donald Trump’s behalf. He appears to have brought that same energy to the Rotary speech. He’s a class act.

Edwards feels near-bulletproof in his R+5 district he won again by 14 points in November. Trump won the state by 3.2 points. The last Democrat to flip the district (as then drawn) was Heath Shuler in 2006 who held it for three terms. (I worked that campaign for NCDP.) Republicans Mark Meadows, Madison Cawthorn, and Edwards followed.

Trump visited the area in January and named Edwards to a “special task force to speed up recovery in Western North Carolina.” Asheville Watchdog’s Tom Fiedler last week likened Edwards to Charlie Brown and the football:

He announced that Edwards, Republican House colleagues Virginia Foxx and Tim Moore, and Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Whatley would constitute a “task force” to examine FEMA’s performance, recommend reforms and accelerate recovery. Putting the words “task force” in quotation marks is purposeful.

Edwards and his colleagues raced to send out news releases announcing the great responsibility and opportunity entrusted to them. “It is an honor to be named by President Trump to the FEMA task force to fix how this broken agency works,” Edwards stated.

Edwards prepared a report for the White House on his district’s Helene recovery needs and asked Trump to reply within seven days. And then?

Since that seven-day deadline Trump has diligently churned out such new executive orders demanding that university accreditation boards cease requiring DEI policies as a positive factor; requiring commercial truckers to speak and write English (a potential problem with French-speaking truckers if Canada becomes a state); threatening “sanctuary cities” with losing federal funds and, this week, proposing to tax movies produced overseas (threatening future remakes of “D-Day,”  “Sands of Iwo Jima” and maybe “Titanic.”). 

Nothing referencing Helene recovery.

As a final humiliation, the White House last week released the list of appointees to the “Council to Assess the Federal Emergency Management Agency” that Trump announced January 24.

Neither Edwards, Foxx nor Moore were on the list. (Repeat the above-referenced image here). 

When asked why Edwards’s name was missing, his office said the media failed to understand the distinction between the FEMA “council,” which was officially created by the January 24 executive order from which he is omitted, and the “task force” consisting of the three GOP House members and Whatley, a Trump loyalist with no experience in disaster management. 

Leaving the Group W backbencher “flat on his back.”

* * * * *

Have you fought dictatorship today?

The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Performative Pointlessness

There is a lot an EPA administrator could be doing. We are in a climate crisis and desperately need to be facing it head on with mitigation and solutions. Republicans won’t allow that. In fact, they are determined to make it worse. That’s their mission.

But the performative politics of the Trump administration is exceedingly stpud. It starts with the president, of course. He’s the master. But they’re all doing it now. Check this out from Lee Zeldin:

The Trump administration is targeting climate technology that automatically turns a vehicle’s engine off when it’s stopped to save fuel.

Stop-start technology has become a common feature in new vehicles as a way to save a few bucks on gas and reduce emissions. Advocates like it because it helps combat climate change, but critics find it irritating.

EPA administrator Lee Zeldin blasted stop-start systems in a post Monday on X, signaling that the agency would take action against it. “Start/stop technology: where your car dies at every red light so companies get a climate participation trophy,” Zeldin said. “EPA approved it, and everyone hates it, so we’re fixing it.”

The EPA doesn’t mandate stop-start technology, but it provides extra fuel economy credits to automakers that adopt it. Spokespeople for the EPA and the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, the auto industry’s trade group, had no immediate comment Monday morning.

Stop-start systems eliminated nearly 10 million tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually as of 2023, according to the Battery Council International. The technology was included in 65% of vehicles in 2023, up from 9% in 2016.

Guess what? This whole thing is completely idiotic. Not only is it not mandated but …

The feature can generally be turned off at the press of a button.

Seriously, it’s beyond idiocracy.

When They Offer You A Bribe You’d Be “Stupid” To Say No, Amirite?

It’s unclear what the actual gift is at this point. We were told yesterday that the plane would go to the “Trump Library” (probably conveniently located at one of his commercial properties) but apparently that may not be correct? So it would be used as Air Force One going forward, apparently. But who knows?

What we do know is that it will require the US Government to practically take it apart piece by piece to ensure that it’s secure from any kind of spying capabilities and will have to be completely retro-fitted to be used as the president’s plane probably costing hundreds of millions. I think at this point, we should just allow the Qatar government to give it to the Trump Organization so that Trump can have it when he leaves office. Why are we playing games here?

By the way, they checked and the Office of Legal Counsel said that Pam baoni didn’t have to recuse herself just because she was a paid lobbyist for the Qatar government just a few months ago. It’s no biggie.

And since we no longer care about conflicts of interest, much less the appearance of one, (until a Democrat holds the office) this is all just a-ok with the MAGA cult including those in the congress.

Never mind.

Not Trying To Hide It

The Trump administration suspended the refugee program on his first day in office. No more refugees! And he’s sending many refugees home. Today, for instance, Trump removed the temporary Protected Status for Afghan refugees, many of whom are here because they helped the U.S. military during the war. They will be killed.. He’s going to ship them back.

But never say that he’s a racist just because the one exception he’s allowing is for white South Africans who he says are the victims of genocide which is literally insane. (He heard this from that fascist nutcase Elon Musk.)That would be some kind of DEI and we know what that means.

A member of the state department said today that they accepted the Afrikaners because they are more easily assimilated and don’t present a security risk. I’m not kidding.

He gave them all American citizenship. I feel like screaming. But what’s the point?

Here’s an institution that’s standing up to this racist madness:

In a striking move that ends a nearly four-decades-old relationship between the federal government and the Episcopal Church, the denomination announced on Monday (May 12) that it is terminating its partnership with the government to resettle refugees, citing moral opposition to resettling white Afrikaners from South Africa who have been classified as refugees by President Donald Trump’s administration.

In a letter sent to members of the church, the Most Rev. Sean W. Rowe — the presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church — said that two weeks ago the government “informed Episcopal Migration Ministries that under the terms of our federal grant, we are expected to resettle white Afrikaners from South Africa whom the U.S. government has classified as refugees.”

The request, Rowe said, crossed a moral line for the Episcopal Church, which is part of the global Anglican Communion that boasts among its leaders the late Archbishop Desmond Tutu, a celebrated and vocal opponent of apartheid in South Africa.

The announcement came just as flights with Afrikaners were scheduled to arrive at Dulles International Airport outside of Washington, D.C., the first batch of entries after Trump declared via a February executive order that the U.S. would take in “Afrikaners in South Africa who are victims of unjust racial discrimination.” The South African government has stridently denied allegations of systemic racial animus, as has a coalition of white religious leaders in the region that includes many Anglicans.

“The stated reasons for (Trump’s actions) are claims of victimisation, violence and hateful rhetoric against white people in South Africa along with legislation providing for the expropriation of land without compensation,” read the letter from white South African religious leaders, which included among its four authors an Anglican priest. “As white South Africans in active leadership within the Christian community, representing diverse political and theological perspectives, we unanimously reject these claims.”

Good for them.

The suspension of refugee programs has left refugee groups scrambling, having to lay off people and otherwise reduce or end their relief programs. A couple of the groups have sued and in one case received an order from the court to restart the program. As is happening throughout the country, the government just isn’t complying.

A 30% Tax Is Still Inflationary

NEWS: U.S. and China agree to a 90-day pause on new tariffs after shipping to U.S. ports plummeted. U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports will be cut from 145% to 30%. Chinese tariffs on U.S. imports will be cut from 125% to 10%.

If tariffs are supposed to result in massive job growth and make the U.S. rich, why lower them? And what about all the manufacturing that’s going to come to the United states to employ all those laid off scientists? I’m confused.

But those drug price cuts are awesome! Except it’s not going to happen because his order is nothing but hot air.

I guess he changed the narrative for this week though, so that’s all that matters.

Amerika

Martin Diaz came to the U.S. as a toddler, fleeing cartel violence. His family had proof of the danger—and hope for safety here. He married a U.S. citizen, and after years of waiting, their visa case finally moved forward.

Days later, ICE showed up at their Spokane home with no warrant, no ID, and no regard for the law. His wife wasn’t home, but a roommate filmed everything.

When he asked for badge numbers, agents said, “None of your business.” Then they assaulted Martin and dragged him away. Now ICE is charging him with assault. But the video tells the truth.

This is what ICE does—lie, escalate, and disappear people.

Habeas Schmabeas

There was a little speculation boomlet a couple of weeks ago when President Trump “promoted” his National Security Adviser Mike Waltz to be the UN Secretary and tasked Secretary of State Marco Rubio with the job temporarily that the name being raised most commonly as a permanent replacement was none other that Senior Adviser Stephen Miller. That idea seemed a little bit strange since Miller has never had a particular interest in global affairs beyond immigration but he has lately been taking on a more public role and commenting on a wide range of issues so perhaps he had decided to expand his role. We haven’t heard much about this idea since it was first floated so perhaps it was just a trial balloon that fizzled.

It was hard to imagine Miller giving up his life’s work to expel as many non-white people from America as possible and that’s a full time job in this administration. In the wake of the shocking propaganda the administration put out celebrating their deportation ritual of alleged gang members to the notorious Salvadoran gulag, we are now seeing story after story popping up all over local and national news, social media and influential podcasts about violent ICE raids of homes and businesses, ordinary people being snatched up when they show up for their legal hearings, violent car stops, and even the arrest of judges and politicians. Very few of the people being imprisoned are gang members or criminals.

It’s taking a toll on the president’s approval rating. The latest round of polls showed him underwater across the board on these policies. But this is all Stephen Miller’s plan and he is undaunted. As I wrote a couple of weeks ago discussing his decision to use the Alien Enemies Act of 1789, Miller understood that what they were intending to do was unprecedented. They are quite seriously looking to deport millions of people.

Miller knew that the courts were a barrier. He was the architect of the ill-fated travel ban in the first administration that was struck down (and later watered down) by the courts and understood that the president was going to have to be very aggressive and frankly, provocative. They needed to assert presidential authority with total confidence and ensure that the Supreme Court understood they were willing to test their dominion as the final word on what the law is.

We’re only part way through that process. So far they have not blatantly defied the courts but they are working them around the edges. Miller is the most vociferous in publicly claiming that the plain words of a Supreme Court order mean the opposite of what they actually say, which is almost disorienting to listen to. The best example is his rant as he stood in the Oval Office and proclaimed that the high court had ruled 9-0 in favor of the administration’s deportation of Kilmar Abrego-Garcia when it had actually been the opposite.

(You can read the order here.)

In a different case pertaining to the deportation flights of Venezuelans to El Salvador the Supreme Court ruled that actions on behalf of detainees must be brought in the districts where the prisoners are detained, and the intended deportees must be notified in time that they can petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In other words, they must be allowed a hearing before they can be kidnapped and sent to the Salvadoran gulag.

So far, judges in three districts have ruled that the Alien Enemies Act on which the administration’s policy is predicated, has been inappropriately invoked to justify this policy because of the fatuous assertion that we have been invaded by foreign gang members. That is not the plain meaning of “invasion” in this context. You could just as easily claim that the Beatles should have been deported because of the “British Invasion” of 1964.

The Alien Enemies Act isn’t the only trick Miller has up his sleeve, however. Last Friday he telegraphed another approach.

Yes, despite the fact that the Supreme Court did rule in that previous case that potential deportees have a right to petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Miller is now looking at invoking the suspension clause of the constitution which reads:

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

CNN reported that Trump has been involved in the discussions about suspending habeas corpus noting that he hasn’t said anything specifically but when asked about steps he could take to combat nationwide injunctions against his actions on deportation Trump said:

“There are ways to mitigate it and there’s some very strong ways. There’s one way that’s been used by three very highly respected presidents, but we hope we don’t have to go that route. But there is one way used successfully by three presidents – all highly respected – and hopefully we don’t have to go that way but there are ways of mitigating it.”

Miller and Trump habitually degrade and demean any judges that rule against them and Miller has been especially crude about it routinely calling them “communists” But he may have miscalculated when he said “look, a lot of it depends on whether the courts do the right thing or not.” As law professor Steve Vladek (whose legal rundown of this issue is extremely informative) observed:

He’s suggesting that the administration would (unlawfully) suspend habeas corpus if (but apparently only if) it disagrees with how courts rule in these cases. In other words, it’s not the judicial review itself that’s imperiling national security; it’s the possibility that the government might lose. That’s not, and has never been, a viable argument for suspending habeas corpus. Were it otherwise, there’d be no point to having the writ in the first place—let alone to enshrining it in the Constitution.

One assumes that even if the judiciary is only operating out of self-preservation they might find that to be a threat worth pushing back on. But you never know.

Law Professor Leah Litman, who has written a critique of the Roberts Court due out in a couple of days called Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes, appeared on MSNBC a couple of days ago and observed that while the Chief Justice may have recently commented in public that the job of the judiciary is to check the “excesses” of the other branches, it pays to remember that he is the one who wrote the atrocious immunity decision and has long been a proponent of the Unitary Executive Theory. So it’s entirely possible that Stephen Miller won’t actually have to go nuclear and have Trump suspend habeas corpus after all. But if the court decides that maybe invoking the Alien Enemies Act wasn’t kosher, it’s pretty clear that Miller is prepared to make that move. And who knows what other cards he has left to play after that? He’s prepared for a very long siege.

Oh, and by the way. If you think congress might step in since they are required to ok the suspension of Habeas corpus? Probably not:

Salon

R-E-S-P-E-C-T

Economic “precarity” driving workers to the right

Over at Jacobin, feminist legal scholar, Joan C. Williams, discusses her lates book that urges progressives instead of emphasizing cultural differences, if they want to win back working voters, they must promote “cultural principles that grant average Americans’ lives dignity.”

In a twist on the “last-place aversion” we’ve talked about as driving the middle class to the right (as opposed to “economic anxiety”), “Outclassed: How the Left Lost the Working Class and How to Win Them Back” (St. Martin’s Press, 2025), argues that it’s the insecurity that comes with a threatened loss of status:

Economic precarity is a stronger predictor of support for Trump than poverty, suggesting that Trump has something valuable to say to people hanging on to middle status for dear life. A competent opposition has a responsibility to find out what it is. In Outclassed, Williams argues that the values of the rich and the poor differ from those of the workaday middle, for whom stability, self-discipline, and directness are the dominant ideals. To reverse its political fortunes, the broad left must stop neglecting these pillars of the average American worldview.

Economic anxiety is about loss of stability.

Joan C. Williams

First, the idea that culture is completely separate from economics is a mistake. Class is expressed through cultural differences as well as through power dynamics and economic position.

As far as the cultural differences go, one crucial observation is that non-elites turn servitude into honor. In elite circles, we feel entitled to self-development because it’s available to us, and we focus on self-development and maximizing our skills because that’s what succeeds in elite jobs. But if your best hope for stability is a blue- or pink-collar job where you need to show up reliably without attitude to a job that’s often not intellectually stimulating, you don’t feel entitled to self-development. What’s valuable instead is self-discipline, without which you and your family could end up homeless.

When elites go off the rails, either their parents bail them out or they pay for expensive therapy to develop a new narrative about their lives and find a new path. For working people, there are rarely second chances, even fewer than there were forty years ago. You need to keep your nose clean and stay disciplined. So non-elite culture places a high premium on self-discipline and the institutions that anchor it.

Another way to explain it involves different strategies in what I call the “scrum for social honor.” In elite circles, social honor comes from being articulate, intelligent, and from having an esteemed job — that’s why we’re so eager to tell people our professions immediately. But for blue- and pink-collar working people, their jobs don’t offer social honor, less so with each generation. So they seek alternative avenues to social honor through religion and morality. That’s their card in the deck.

The old models for earning self-respect have decayed. The right is not simply longing for a return to traditional gender roles and whiter days of the 1950s, but to an economic system that that provided a stable home life, on a single income, if necessary.

“Compare that to working-class life today, where people often patch together multiple part-time jobs without benefits or childcare,” Williams says. “It’s sometimes said they’re nostalgic for white privilege, which captures one dimension, but they’re also looking back to when working-class life functioned.”

Meagan Day

But working-class life didn’t function better because of traditional gender roles. That was incidental to the fact that a single income could support a whole family.

Joan C. Williams

That’s right. It was because of wages. But the correlation is powerful, even if causation isn’t there. And that distinction isn’t necessarily obvious to people. What they know is that their parents’ or grandparents’ families looked quite different from theirs, and everything seemed to work then. Now nothing seems to work.

That is the “great again” Donald Trump is selling, Williams implies, along with the people to blame for why things ain’t so great.

Democrats, she suggests, should play to working people’s need for self-respect. There’s more at the link.

* * * * *

Have you fought dictatorship today?

The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense