Skip to content

Month: May 2025

The 2025 SIFF Preview

The 51st annual Seattle International Film Festival opens May 15th and runs through May 25th. This year’s SIFF features a total of 245 shorts, documentaries, and narrative films in 63 languages. The brick-and-mortar event will be immediately followed by a week of select virtual screenings from this year’s catalog (May 26th to June 1st) on the SIFF Channel.

SIFF has certainly grown exponentially since its first incarnation in 1976 (in case the math is making you crazy, festival organizers “skipped” the 13th event; you know how superstitious show people get about Scottish kings and such). Compare the numbers: In 1976, the Festival boasted a whopping 19 films from 9 countries, with one lone venue. Then again, there were only 13 people on the staff in 1976.

Regardless of how large or small the staff, the one constant over the decades has been the quality of the curation. Long before “sharing files” (or even making mix tapes) was a thing, SIFF’s annual lineup reflected that sense of joy in turning friends on to something new and exciting; instilling the sense there was a tangible film lover’s community (others who enjoyed being alone together, out there in the dark).

From a joint statement by Excecutive Director Tom Mara and Artistic Director Beth Barrett:

More than ever, the power of thoughtfully crafted stories is necessary as we face a quickening influx of distressing and bewildering news that distracts us from pausing, discerning, and perhaps gaining greater understanding of our world and each other. Films inspire us, invigorate us, and buoy us while we struggle with the heightened emotions and uncertainty of our time. At SIFF, you don’t have to face these challenges alone. The Festival is designed to not only connect us with films but also with one another. Each year during the Festival, the two of us find ourselves taking a step back to appreciate how each screening spurs new connections among the film lovers in the audience. These connections and the stories told on screen help us to understand each other’s adversities and joys, which is crucial with the world so divided. […]

A society without an arts landscape rich in beauty, diversity, and critical thought is a society that leaves little room for personal and collective flourishing. SIFF is dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education so that we can all continue to grow as individuals, neighbors, and global citizens.

Amen, and please pass the popcorn.

This will be the 33rd SIFF I’ve attended (in one guise or the other). As (an alleged) film critic, I have been covering SIFF for Hullabaloo now for 19 years (since 2007), but as always, the looming question is – where to begin? The trick to navigating festivals is developing a 6th sense for films in your wheelhouse (I embrace my OCD and channel it like a cinematic dowser).

Let’s dive in!

This years Opening Night Gala selection is an Irish import. Four Mothers is the latest from writer-director Darren Thornton (A Date For Mad Mary). James McArdle stars as a gay novelist about to embark on an important American book tour. However, he is unexpectedly sidelined by having to take care of four elderly women (including his mam) for a week. A delightful dramedy/road movie inspired by the Italian film Mid-August Lunch (my 2009 SIFF review).

Politics, politics. I’m intrigued by two 1960s period pieces: Waves (Czech Republic) promises to be a “nerve-wracking journalism thriller” set in 1967 Czechoslovakia; and The Safe House (Switzerland) is a comedy-drama about a 9 year-old boy and his eccentric family grappling with political unrest in the streets of 1968 Paris.

The documentary Suburban Fury (USA) profiles FBI informant Sara Jane Moore, who attempted to assassinate President Ford in 1975. The timely doc Free Leonard Peltier (USA) “…outlines the decades-long efforts to free the Indigenous activist from prison through the commutation of his sentence at the age of 80 in January 2025.” And Transfers (Argentina) is billed as “a poignant documentary about Argentina’s onetime military dictatorship’s use of the infamous and brutal Death Flights.”

No people like show people: Chain Reactions (USA) features five horror luminaries discussing how Tobe Hooper’s no-budget classic The Texas Chainsaw Massacre impacted their life and work (no…Elon Musk is not among them). Jean Cocteau (USA) utilizes Cocteau’s journals, letters and artistic works to assemble an intimate portrait of the filmmaker/playwright/poet. By the Stream (South Korea) is a drama about a lecturer who coaxes her famous uncle out of retirement to write and direct a play for her students after the production hits a snag.

In the comedy Dancing Queen in Hollywood (Norway), a hip-hop dancing duo travels to L.A. with hopes of starring in a music video. Scarecrow in a Garden of Cucumbers (USA) is a 1972 film starring the legendary Holly Woodlawn (immortalized in Lou Reed’s “Walk on the Wild Side”) as “a small-town girl hoping to make it big in New York City”. This is a revival presentation, via a newly-restored print by the Academy Film Archive (this “lost” film has never been available in any home video format).

Speaking of midnight movies…Fucktoys (USA) is described as a “…campy, vividly pastel-colored romp about a woman who embarks upon a sex worker odyssey through Trashtown with her nonbinary friend to break a terrible curse that has befallen her.” OK then. Since I’m already going down this road: The animated adult musical Spermageddon (Norway) follows the adventures of “sperm cells Simon and Cumilla as they attempt to defeat the nefarious Jizzmo” (I just report the news, folks). I’m eager to see Sanatorium Under the Sign of the Hourglass (UK/Poland/Germany) – the latest stop-motion animation from the enigmatic Brothers Quay (I wrote about their work here).

Crime and punishment: Sons (Denmark) is a drama about a prison guard (Sidse Babett Knudsen of Borgen fame) who faces deep moral and ethical dilemmas when she learns that a dark figure from her past has been transferred to her facility. Cloud (Japan) is billed as a “genre-bending potboiler about a craven opportunist who finds success as an internet reseller, only for revenge-seeking vigilantes to come calling”.

Set in the mid-90s, The Kingdom (France) concerns a Corsican mobster and his daughter who are forced to go on the run when an underground war breaks out between nationalist groups and crime syndicates. And here’s a special treat for noiristas: The Glass Web in 3-D (USA)…Jack Arnold’s 1953 crime drama has been newly restored by the 3-D Film Archive from the original 35mm camera negatives. Sounds like fun!

I always look forward to SIFF’s music-related fare. There are 3 promising documentaries on my radar:1-800-ON-HER-OWN documents the making of alt-folk singer-songwriter Ani DiFranco ‘s 2021 album “Revolutionary Love”, Paul Anka: His Way (USA) covers the life and career of the Canadian-born pop idol and songwriter, and Salsa Lives (Columbia) features genre legends like Rubén Blades and Henry Fiol and “…shows how entire generations have celebrated their common identity through music and dance.”

There’s always room on my checklist for some fantasy and sci-fi. Time Travel is Dangerous (UK) is a comedy-adventure about a pair of North London antique shop owners who stumble across a working bumper car time machine (shades of Time Bandits). U Are the Universe (Ukraine) concerns “… a space trucker [who] thinks he’s the last living person in the universe…until a call from a distant space station sets him on a course across the cosmos.” Right in my wheelhouse. And for a one-time-only event, SIFF will be presenting a screening of The Dark Crystal, wih DJ NicFit providing a live soundtrack to accompany Jim Henson and Frank Oz’s cult 1982 fantasy adventure.

Always with the drama: Boong (India) is a coming-of-age/class warfare tale of a 9 year-old schoolboy who hits the road with his best friend to investigate whether or not his absentee father really has passed away as rumored. Shot in black and white, Color Book (USA) is a “day in the life” story about a recently-widowed Black father in Atlanta who takes his young disabled son to his first professional baseball game. Souleymane’s Story (France) is a timely tale about the travails of a Guinean immigrant who is trying to apply for asylum.

Sorry, Baby (this year’s Closing Night Gala selection) was written and directed by its star Eva Victor (who you may recognize from Showtime’s Billions). The film is described as a “…nonlinear, seriocomic story about a melancholic English professor’s complicated path toward healing in the aftermath of an all-too-common tragedy.”

Obviously, I’ve barely scratched the surface. I’ll be plowing through the catalog and sharing reviews with you beginning next Saturday. In the meantime, visit the SIFF site for full details on the films, event screenings, special guests, and more.

Browse my SIFF review archives at Den of Cinema

Dennis Hartley

More Trump Effect

I wrote about the world’s democracies moving against Trumpism for Salon last week and it got quite a bit of play. The rightward movement, even the anti-incumbent push we’ve seen in recent times seems to be halted.

I haven’t written anything about the new pope because it’s not really my area. But it is fascinating to me that it appears that the Catholic Church is making a similar statement of resistance. It has enormous clout and I have to give credit where credit is due that they decided to make such a statement. They not only chose someone from the progressive wing of the church they chose and American to rival the fame and influence of you-know-who. Good on them.

Politico reports:

When the late Pope Francis challenged Donald Trump on immigration, climate change and poverty during the president’s first term, the White House and its allies responded with a collective shrug.

But with Catholic Cardinals choosing an American to lead the Church for the first time in its history, that will change. The Chicago-born Robert Prevost, America’s first pope, has a worldview that appears to be at odds with “America First.”

Elected on just the second day of voting, Pope Leo could become a global rival to the president, one who has the homegrown credibility to sway Catholic Republicans more than his predecessor did and speak with a voice that has a louder boom here in the U.S.

Trump on Thursday immediately praised the selection of Leo, who lived most of his adult life in Peru, promising to meet with the new pope soon.

“It is such an honor to realize that he is the first American Pope. What excitement, and what a Great Honor for our Country. I look forward to meeting Pope Leo XIV. It will be a very meaningful moment!” Trump posted on Truth Social.

But it’s not difficult to imagine the looming conflicts to come. Like his predecessor, Leo hails from a more progressive, inclusive wing of Catholicism, preaching peace and the importance of building bridges in his first address from the balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica, though it appears he still holds traditional Catholic views on LGBTQ+ issues.

I’m pretty sure Trump thinks it will be a meaningful moment for the pope to meet him not the other way around. He’ll soon realize that his cult is not happy:

One of the president’s most prominent Catholic allies, Steve Bannon, called Leo the “worst pick for MAGA Catholics,” deeming him the “anti-Trump pope.”

“This is an anti-Trump vote by the globalists that run the Curia — this is the pope Bergoglio and his clique wanted,” said Bannon, referring to Francis by his given name, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

A group of hard-line conservative Catholics had launched what was essentially a lobbying campaign for a more conservative pope. One of the hard-right candidates, Athanasius Schneider, a bishop in Kazakhstan, had claimed that refugees in Europe are a “mass invasion” leading to the spread of Islam, while another, American Cardinal Raymond Burke, actually endorsed Trump.

Pope Leo’s been on social media and he actually challenged JD Vance’s fatuous claim that true Christians know that their obligation is to love their family first, then their country then people in the rest of the world, pointing out that the faith is actually universal. But then JD isn’t really a Catholic. He’s a shape shifting incubus who needed a religion and picked that one. Still, then Cardinal Prevost must have known he was venturing into some pretty dicey political territory.

He’s also a registered Republican but his last known vote was in the 2016 GOP primary. What happened in the Republican party that year? Hmmmm. Apparently, this is another MAGA lie. There is no party registration in Illinois.

A Good Nazi

I don’t know who this guy is but he’s a roaring MAGA asshole. What an awful person to choose to run an agency that’s designed to help people recover from disaster. I think we might do better with Brownie the horse show guy.

I’ve had bosses like this. It never goes well.

QOTD: Naomi Klein

From her interview with Rolling Stone. She just nails it.

“It’s not just about money. It’s about being so rich that you actually believe yourself to be God. This is the corrupting influence.” 

Her comment above goes on:

We have all these slogans: “Every billionaire is a policy failure.” But it goes beyond that. When you have people who have more money than has ever been concentrated in the history of money — you do believe that you’re better than other people, in a way that I don’t think that we can totally fathom. 

What does Elon Musk think it means to be the richest person in the world? How does that change you? One of the ways that it changes people’s brains is you believe the rules shouldn’t apply to you. You believe you should be able to act like a king. And when you can’t — when you’re told by the state you actually have to follow these rules, or do other things — it ignites rage. And we’re in that rage. 

That describes Trump too. He’s a billionaire and he’s president of the United States! He’s one of the most famous people in the world! HOW DARE THEY TRY TO TELL HIM WHAT HE CAN AND CANNOT DO!

She says:

We underestimated the rage that inspired. So we’re in a counter-revolution. And it’s hard to understand, because these people have everything. But what they want is beyond that. They want to not be accountable to anyone. Because what they want is absolutely everything.

Yarvinification

Gish-galloping America back to monarchy

Still image from Back to the Future (1985).

Harvard University’s Danielle Allen this week “debated” right-wing influencer and monarchist, Curtis Yarvin, sage of the “dark enlightenment.” It was a non-sanctioned event. “His work is not of a caliber that passes an academic bar. It is too full of historical error and sophistical argument,” she told Harvard magazine, but students asked her to engage them.

“I think people do need to understand Yarvin’s argument, both what people experience as its attractions, and its errors, which are profound,” she added.

The Guardian reported last week:

“Students asked me to participate,” said Allen, when asked about why she was debating Yarvin. Multiple requests for comment sent to Harvard about the debate went unanswered.

In a meandering and widely cited interview with the New York Times in January, Yarvin tried laundering his ideas under the guise of advocating for a CEO-led US government, which is shorthand for an unelected dictatorship. Whenever challenged to answer direct questions on some of his most controversial blogs, Yarvin obfuscated.

Allen explained in The Wall Street Journal that Yarvin’s influence on students surpised her. (We’ve covered Yarvin here multiple times.) He calls for an absolute monarch and believes Donald Trump fits the bill. He should rule by decree. “Mr. Yarvin leads them astray with his vision of absolute monarchy and racial cleansing,” she explains.

Allen told MSNBC was it was not so much a debate as Yarvin gish-galloping (my word) his way through a slurry of ideas. Harvard magazine’s decription concurs:

As the conversation developed, Yarvin shared extended tangential anecdotes and name-dropped philosophers and historians. He twice discussed chimpanzees and early humans, first as evidence of the inherent human desire to dominate others and then as a rebuttal to innate human equality. Allen rarely engaged with Yarvin’s specific stories, but did question his reading of Aristotle.

Allen pushes back in the Journal:

He gets his first principles wrong, so we have to return to ours. Most important, human equality precedes human differences. We can identify differences among us only because we are all human, and in that regard equal. As humans we share a capacity for moral judgment and an innate striving to choose actions that make tomorrow better. This is how our drive and capacity for freedom show themselves.

The proposition that all humans are created equal has never meant that we are all the same. Our equality lies in these features of humanity that make us moral beings. Nor does human difference yield fixed and permanent groupings or determine where and how human talent in its immense variety will show itself. The government that will best help humans flourish will start by protecting human freedom. This requires maximal space for self-government, and also government of the whole people that is by and for the people. Not in the interest of those who govern, but in the interest of the governed.

The principle of equality articulated in the Declaration of Independence was meant so seriously that it grounded the abolition of slavery in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Vermont before the end of the Revolutionary War, and in Rhode Island even before the Declaration. The Confederacy’s own declaration of secession was explicitly a rejection of the founding Declaration. America’s history has always reflected this inconsistency, but the egalitarian principle has been there from the beginning. It isn’t a weak-minded invention of the 20th century.

Mr. Yarvin’s identity politics are the mirror image of the worst versions on the left. His historical inaccuracies mirror those of leftist historians who seek to paint all history as white supremacy. The past is a story of the contest between equality and freedom on the one hand and supremacy on the other. We face that contest again.

If our constitutional democracy is weak today—failing to help us meet our governing challenges—that may be because we have lapsed in civic participation. We have ceased to claim our own equality through our institutions, which offer it. We have allowed political parties to capture our institutions, and to govern for their own sake rather than the public good. We need to renovate our democratic institutions, starting with party reform.

Amen. Working on it while I’m polishing my greaves.

* * * * *

Have you fought dictatorship today?

The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Can We Stop Pretending Now?

This isn’t “unacceptable.” This is unAmerican.

The Trump administration is an exercise in an addled, 78-year-old man-child flexing autocratic power and encouraging cruelty for cruelty’s sake. Trump the Insecure needs to satiate his bottomless appetite for revenge and to impress the world’s real autocrats who will never accept him into their club.

Others in Trump’s circle, like “Discount Goebbels” and Russ Vought, flex their autocratic impulses from behind the curtain as operators of Audio-Animatronic Trump. The Trump White House is cosplaying a dysfunctional reboot of “The West Wing” as a reality show with poseurs pretending to be leaders. Just not leaders of a democracy.

“We are getting close now,” warns author Seth Abramson. Close to?

And Trump himself? He’s in charge. He’s not in charge. He’s in charge. He’s….

Politico:

Since President Donald Trump was sworn into office in January, he has sat for just 12 presentations from intelligence officials of the President’s Daily Brief.

That’s a significant drop compared with Trump’s first term in office, according to a POLITICO analysis of his public schedule.

Trump doesn’t know what he doesn’t know. Same as it ever was.

As the headline on David Graham’s Atlantic column declared earlier this week, “The president wants to seize new powers, yet he’s also eager to hand off responsibility for hard decisions.”

Kristen Welker (NBC News): Do people in the U.S. have a right to due process of law?

Trump: “I don’t know. I’m not a lawyer.”

Welker: “Don’t you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president?”

Trump: “I don’t know. I have to respond by saying, again, I have brilliant lawyers that work for me, and they are going to obviously follow what the Supreme Court said.”

And tax cuts?

Trump wants the power and the perks, just not the responsibility. Same as it ever was.

Can we stop pretending now?

ICE agents arrested Newark, New Jersey Mayor Ras Baraka on Friday outside a privately owned ICE facility for “tresspassing” after inviting him inside the gate and asking him to leave. They manhandled three members of Congress who called the episode “unacceptable.”

 
View on Threads

It went as well as everything else under Trump 2.0. Fox News accused the visitors of storming an ICE facility.”

Can we stop pretending? It’s not unacceptable. It’s unAmerican. It’s Trumpism, something else entirely.

Behold. Trump is tripling down on ignoring the Constitution and the courts.

Here’s a preview of the coming clash with SCOTUS which has already confirmed noncitizens are entitled to due process. “Sudden deportation” violates the Constitution.

Joyce White Vance (@joycewhitevance.bsky.social) 2025-05-10T01:19:07.323Z

We’re not “close.” We’re there.

* * * * *

Have you fought dictatorship today?

The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Friday Night Soother

Elephants!

For most of her life, Pupy has lived in the center of a busy city, in what was once known as the Hindu Temple of the Elephants at Ecoparque Buenos Aires, far removed from the vast wild spaces that elephants need to thrive.

On Monday, April 14, Pupy and the transport team began the long-awaited road trip to sanctuary. On April 18, Pupy officially arrived at Elephant Sanctuary Brazil! Here she will have the space, care, and autonomy she needs to enjoy a more natural, dignified way of life.

Join us as Pupy takes her first steps onto sanctuary grounds.

May 5th: Pupy having a blast with dead trees:

About four and a half years ago, a fire swept through the sanctuary property. Those of you who followed us then will remember that no people, elephants, or other sanctuary animals were harmed, but the female African habitat saw heavy damage. We allowed the fire to run through that area because there were no elephants living there at the time, and we wanted to do our best to stop the fire in a safer place. As a result of the fire, there were a number of dead trees in the area, which we left in case the African elephants wanted something fun to destroy–and Pupy has been having a bit of fun with them. She seems to be getting a kick out of pushing the burned trees and knocking them over so easily. 

We decided to walk along the fence line to see what the paths she’s making look like and what she’s knocking down. So far, she’s only downed one large tree and she’s definitely making trails, though she doesn’t always stick to them. For those of you who are worried about the number of trees she’s knocking down, she’s definitely going to remodel a bit. Pupy has about 13 acres of land right now and will soon get half of the 80 acre expansion more. With the new welding team, they are making great progress. None of the trees, except for a few large old growth trees (which we are protecting with fencing) in the female African habitat even existed when the sanctuary was opened; it was almost all pasture grass for cattle. When the land is given time to recover, it flourishes, so there’s plenty for Pupy to have fun with now.  

We’re also taking note of what Pupy is eating inside the habitat. She will occasionally bring branches up to the barn, so she’s definitely not wasteful. We’ve also discovered that she has a favorite type of tree, and are drying out a sample to have it officially identified.  But she’s having a ball stripping the bark off these specific trees to eat and also eating full branches. Aside from knocking around the dead trees, she’s mostly sticking to smaller trees for the time being. She seems to be discovering that all of this greenery is hers for the taking. 

The Global Sanctuary for Elephants exists to create vast, safe spaces for captive elephants, where they are able to heal physically and emotionally.  There are elephants around the world in need of sanctuary, but too few places exist to be able to care for even a fraction of the elephants.  International support is necessary to build sanctuaries for elephants in need of rescue and rehabilitation.  

Elephants are the best and they are in trouble. It breaks my heart. You can follow their rescues at the web site. It’s a really great organization.