Skip to content

Month: July 2025

The Madman Theory Fundraising Pitch

Trump liked to brag to his rich friends that he threatened Putin and Xi with bombing Moscow and Beijing:

“With Putin I said, ‘If you go into Ukraine, I’m going to bomb the sh*t out of Moscow. I’m telling you I have no choice,’” Trump said during one 2024 fundraiser, according to the audio. “And then [Putin] goes, like, ‘I don’t believe you.’ But he believed me 10%.”

Trump later claimed he relayed a similar warning to Chinese President Xi Jinping over a potential invasion of Taiwan, telling him that the US would bomb Beijing in response.

“He thought I was crazy,” Trump said of Xi, before noting that “we never had a problem.”

The audio has not previously been aired before and is detailed in a new book called “2024”.

I’m sure he’s lying because he’s ultimately a coward. But it’s telling that he uses that kind of puerile drivel as a sales pitch and these rich fools like it.

Trump referenced his conversations with Putin and Xi while arguing that he would have staved off conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza if he were president instead of Joe Biden – a claim he’s continued to repeat as he now struggles to end both wars.

He talked a lot of shit:

“One thing I’d do is any student that protests, I would throw them out of the country,” Trump said at a second closed-door fundraiser, vowing to crack down on pro-Palestinian demonstrations on college campuses. “Those people made a big mistake. Throw them out of the country, and I think that will stop it.”

After one donor voiced concern that some of the student protesters would eventually be “running this country,” Trump pressed the audience to “really be generous” in helping him get elected.

“If you get me elected, we will set that movement back 25 to 30 years,” he said.

At another fundraiser, Trump pressed attendees to give more to his campaign by asserting that Republicans were at a disadvantage because “the welfare people will always vote for Democrats.”

“The unions give big money, the civil service stuff gives big money, and they have the advantage of welfare,” he said. “The one thing that I have to say to my Jewish friends: You’ve got to get them to start voting Republican.”

This does show that even beyond the mass deportation of undocumented workers, his other deportation threats were something he was serious about from the beginning. He’s always seen deportation of anyone, even citizens, as a viable way to enforce his will. It’s all about threats, tariffs, deportation, revenge and graft. Every single bit of it ugly and nihilistic.

He understood from the beginning that this was what drives the right wing in America, not “freedom”, the flag, Jesus or family values. For way too many of our fellow citizens it’s just about hate and resentment and he was ready to deliver. And he’s doing it.

What Double Standard Do You Speak Of?

And, by the way, the reason there are so many injunctions in the first place is because Trump is staging a revolution with unlawful Executive Orders. And the Supremes are intervening on his behalf the vast majority of the time.

They are not going to save us, folks. We’re on our own.

The MAGA Rosetta Stone

They are so mad

Glenn Beck:

Pam Bondi should resign—not because of a cover-up, but for incompetence. Not only is there a minute missing from the Epstein cell video, BUT IT WASN’T EVEN THE RIGHT CAMERA ANGLE. What the DOJ gave us was a partial view of the facility, which JUST MISSES Epstein’s cell. We’ve known for years there wasn’t a working camera on his cell, so WHY RELEASE THIS VIDEO? And why not tell us there’s a video glitch in advance of the release?! This isn’t about whether Epstein killed himself or not. What matters more is REAL transparency and justice. But instead what we got was absolute INCOMPETENCE in the Attorney General’s office.

If you’re wondering what they think this is really all about, here’s Beck on X:

The Epstein “Evidence List” isn’t just damning—it’s clarifying. No matter what you believe about Epstein’s past or fate, five conclusions can be logically drawn from the material seized. This thread is for anyone who still cares about truth.


This Was Not a Small or Isolated Operation Dozens of devices. Thousands of photos. Labeled photo albums. Surveillance tapes. Blueprints. Foreign passports. This wasn’t one man with a dark secret. This was infrastructure. Logistics. Coordination. A system. 

There’s a Massive Digital Footprint. Hundreds of hard drives, USBs, CDs, backup servers—some labeled with things like “nude girl pics book 4.” Travel logs. Employee directories. Video tapes. The real question: Why hasn’t this been fully disclosed to the public? 


 Intelligence Involvement Isn’t a Stretch. An Austrian passport with Epstein’s face. Honeytrap-style setups. International mobility. Too much precision, too much reach, too many decades undetected. This isn’t wild theory. It’s a logical hypothesis.  The System’s Silence Is Itself Evidence If anyone else had even 1/10 of this material—underage photos, coded filenames, flight logs—they’d be under a prison. But here? Crickets. No prosecutions. No answers. That’s the real scandal. 

Our Institutions Are On Trial This is bigger than Epstein. It’s about media complicity. Justice deferred. Power protected. Truth buried. Until this case is fully revealed, every elite institution carries a stench they can’t wash off. 

To dismiss this as “conspiracy” is to admit you no longer believe in accountability. Truth about Epstein is not morbid curiosity. It’s a civic test. And every day we fail to demand answers, we normalize elite immunity. 

If we don’t confront what’s in those files… We’ve declared that truth in America is now negotiable. That justice is a luxury of the unimportant.That power is a shield for the perverse. 

The Epstein case isn’t over.

It’s the Rosetta Stone of public trust.

And if we don’t get to the bottom of it, we’ll never restore what’s already been lost. 

Why they think this is the Rosetta Stone is beyond me. I mean, really???

This is just mind-boggling! And recall this:

This is Virginia Giuffre the most famous Epstein victim. I've always wondered why this little factoid hasn't gotten more attention. (Actually, I don't wonder at all)

digby (@digby56.bsky.social) 2025-07-09T16:04:22.319Z

This has got to be the weirdest bullshit they’ve come up with. QAnon was totally bizarre of course. But this implicates their own Dear Leader! What????

They are so far down the rabbit hole that I don’t think they can ever climb their way back out.

The Plan

Wikimedia commons

Lol. This is how the Trump administration wants to make America great again:

Americans fear that they will lose their Medicaid coverage thanks to the massive cuts Republicans made to the program when passing President Donald Trump’s “One Big, Beautiful Bill.” Luckily, the Trump administration came up with a new and novel way for people to earn their health insurance coverage back.

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said that Americans can work the fields to replace the thousands of immigrant farmworkers the Trump administration is deporting—leaving farms desperate for labor.

“We move the workforce toward automation and 100% American participation, which again with 34 million people, able-bodied on Medicaid, we should be able to do fairly quickly,” Rollins said Tuesday at a news conference at the Department of Agriculture.

There are not 34 million “able bodied” people on Medicaid who will be available to pick the strawberries, much less will they be willing to do it. What are they going to do, send the masked secret police into the cities to abduct these citizens and send them out to the farms once they’ve deported all the immigrants? (That’s assuming they actually exist, which they don’t. This myth of the young male scamming Medicaid for that sweet, free health care while they sit home playing their video games is … uhm …. incorrect)

They keep insisting that there are millions and millions of Americans who are champing at the bit to work in meatpacking plants and lettuce fields if only we can get rid of the “illegals” who are stealing those precious jobs and it’s so stupid it makes my head hurt. But I guess they truly believe that turning back the clock to a time when America was an agrarian society or, at best, relive the industrial revolution with everyone but the very rich working in sweat shops or as servants is what the American Dream is all about. For us peasants anyway.

Trump’s Keystone Kops

We already knew that Whiskey Pete Hegseth has been unilaterally suspending arms shipments to the Ukraine and now this:

The Trump administration’s top diplomat, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, was overseeing a deal to free several Americans and dozens of political prisoners held in Venezuela in exchange for sending home about 250 Venezuelan migrants the United States had deported to El Salvador.

But the deal never happened.

Part of the reason: President Trump’s envoy to Venezuela was working on his own deal, one with terms that Venezuela deemed more attractive. In exchange for American prisoners, he was offering to allow Chevron to continue its oil operations in Venezuela, a vital source of revenue for its authoritarian government.

The discussions, which included the release of about 80 Venezuelan political prisoners, and the two different deals were described by two U.S. officials and two other people who are familiar with the talks and sought anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the issue.

The State Department never sealed the deal. The top U.S. officials did not appear to be communicating with each other and ended up at cross purposes. The approximately 250 people expelled from the United States are still being held in a maximum-security prison in El Salvador. And it became clear that while Mr. Trump’s White House once said that it had no control over the detainees in El Salvador, it was willing to use them as bargaining chips.

The envoy? Former internet troll Ric Grenell whose other job is running Lincoln Center.

Mr. Grenell declined an interview request, but in an email used a profanity to denounce The Times’s account of the separate deals as false.

A total mess…

Are We A Police State?

We’re sure beginning to look like one

After 9/11 when it was discovered that the plot to take down the World Trade Center had been suspected by various players in the country’s national security establishment but they never shared the information with one another, it was decided that the system needed to be reformed to prevent such a thing from ever happening again. They established the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to coordinate all the intelligence agencies and they created a brand new department to take charge of domestic security. Many of us knew that nothing good was going to come of that when they decided on the Orwellian title “Department of Homeland Security.”

Americans had never used that word “homeland” before and for good reason. It evoked the “blood and soil” rhetoric of the third reich which referred to Germany as “the fatherland.” (And yes, it was also reminiscent the term “motherland” a term used by the Soviet Union in WWII.) The United States, being an immigrant country, didn’t see itself that way, instead basing its national identity and patriotic unity around the ideals of the constitution. But after the attacks, “the homeland” seemed more vulnerable and the people in charge grabbed the opportunity to expand the the reach of the federal security apparatus and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency was created to work alongside the already substantial forces of the Customs and Border Patrol (CBP)under our new “Homeland” security department.

This was in addition to the already very significant police powers of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Drug Enforcement Agency and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives which continued to work under the Department of Justice. All of this meant that the federal police powers had become a massively powerful arm of the U.S. government. Well, we ain’t seen nothing yet.

This was not supposed to be the case. In America’s federalist system, most policing was to be done by state and local authorities under their own laws and judicial systems. The feds had specific jurisdictions related to interstate crimes, the border etc. That division of labor has always been considered one of our system’s protections against autocracy. Unfortunately, just as so many of our other vaunted checks and balances — the three branches, state sovereignty, local control — that’s proving to be anything but a bulwark protecting our individual liberties guaranteed by the constitution. It turns out those guarantees are only as solid as the good faith of those in power and that’s a very bad bet right now.

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court once again used its “shadow docket” to lift an injunction that had been preventing Trump from carrying out plans to wreck the federal government. This one stemmed from a case brought by a coalition that includes labor unions, non-profit organizations, and cities and counties in California, Illinois, Maryland, Texas, and Washington, that had halted his mass firing of federal employees, stating that it was very likely that he would eventually win the case anyway. The reduction in force will come across 21 different agencies which will hit virtually every department that serves the American people. It’s going to be a bloodbath — and that’s on top of the bloodbath that’s already taken place.

It won’t, however, hit those police agencies. In fact, the Homeland Security Department is getting a massive infusion of new money in the new GOP budget bill, to pay for 10,000 new hires, retention bonuses, detention camps, military equipment, you name it. It’s been allocated around $170 billion, including about $75 billion for ICE alone through 2029. Its funding is now larger than the FBI, DEA, ATF, Bureau of Prisons, and US Marshals Service combined and it’s detention funding outstrips the budget for the entire federal prison system. The Border Patrol is getting a nice $7.8 billion bump to hire 3,000 new agents as well.

All in all, it makes ICE and CPB the largest police force in our nation’s history. Now that the mass firings of every other agency has been given the green light, this makes the federal workforce little more than cops and soldiers.Does that make the U.S. a police state?

If there’s one thing we know about bureaucracies, if you build it they will use it. Setting aside the predictable graft and corruption that will inevitably result from such a fast, unaccountable tsunami of money, we know that it is going to be impossible to hire such a large number of qualified, well-vetted employees because we’ve actually been here before. After 9/11 there was a huge hiring surge for the CBP.

Journalist Garrett Graff reported on this at the time and writes that it was a monumental trainwreck:

As I totaled up in 2014, “there were 2,170 misconduct arrests of CBP officers and agents—ranging from corruption to domestic violence from 2005 through 2012—meaning that one CBP officer or agent was arrested every single day for seven years.” Even by 2017, a decade after the hiring surge, CBP was still seeing an agent or officer arrested every 36 hours. “The Border Patrol was never big on the huge hiring,” one former training officer told me. “We weren’t prepared. That’s never worked out for anyone.”

Unfortunately, today that would be a feature not a bug. Stephen Miller and the heads of these agencies don’t have many scruples when it comes to this policy.

This week we saw what a casual observer might have thought were military maneuvers in the middle of America’s second largest city. ICE, CBP, FBI and National Guard troops rolled through Los Angeles in military vehicles, dressed in full battle gear to take over downtown’s MacArthur Park. As it happened there were virtually no people in the park except some kids who had been attending a summer day camp and were hustled away when the troops arrived. So the agents on foot and horseback just marched from one end of the park to the other apparently just to announce their presence with authority. “Bizarre,” doesn’t begin to describe it.

According to military documents obtained by independent journalist Ken Klippenstein, this operation was supposedly designed to shut down the distribution of fake IDs and “show their presence.” He posted documents that reveal the CBP and ICE to be living in some kind of delusional fantasy in which they’re fighting MS-13 and the drug cartels in the streets of L.A. They’re even apparently talking about making the park into a “forward command base” in the park. The sector commander of the CBP Gregory Bovino told Fox News, “better get used to us now, cause this is going to be normal very soon. We will go anywhere, anytime we want in Los Angeles.”

It’s easy to toss this off as some kind of cos-play by wannabe soldiers and it is to some extent. The reality is that they are mostly rousting peaceful working people trying to live their lives. But this group is about to start swallowing a firehose full of money and other resources and if you think this can’t add up to something much more sinister than a “show of force” I don’t think you’re paying attention. The Homeland Security police forces have been given a green light to roll through the streets of America’s cities and towns like a conquering army. It may not yet fit the technical definition of a police state but it’s sure beginning to look like one.

Salon

Age Of Unreason

Royalists Are On The March

Grover Norquist merely fantasized about returning to the McKinley era. A Gilded Age wealth gap, few regulations on industry, weak labor protections, tariffs not taxes, etc. But that was when Norquist was in his heyday and showing out as Republicans’ radical fringe. Today’s conservative fringe yawns at McKinley. They want to return to feudalism.

Josh Kovensky writes at TPM about a speech J.D. Vance gave last weekend at the Claremont Institute that amounts to a repudiation of the values expressed in the Declaration of Independence:

What Vance expressed to the friendly Claremont audience was a dramatically reduced vision of American citizenship. It’s one in which having ancestors who have lived here for generations entitles you to more; a vision of citizenship that’s long existed around the world, with a notable and aspirational exception in the United States.

“Identifying America just with agreeing with the principles, let’s say, of the Declaration of Independence — that’s a definition that is way over-inclusive and under-inclusive at the same time,” Vance said.

He explained that such a definition “would include hundreds of millions, maybe billions of foreign citizens who agree” with the principles of the Declaration of Independence, dubbing it “the logic of America as a purely creedal nation.”

No one is proposing that, but Vance is not one to let facts get in the way of erecting a strawman he can knock down. He alleges (without evidence) that the left wants to exclude from citizenship people with nonprogressive politics the way he alleged last year that Haitians were eating cats and dogs. His point is that agreeing to an American creed is insufficient to define citizenship. Vance want to see a more blood-and-soil definition.

“I think the people whose ancestors fought in the Civil War have a hell of a lot more claim over America than the people who say they don’t belong,” he concluded.

Kovensky writes:

Vance wasn’t talking about an America that’s entirely closed off to new immigrants; rather, it’s an America where “heritage” counts as much as values.

Watching this, it’s easy to go too far down the opposite path: thinking that what Vance is describing is a leap towards something new; assuming that America has always found a way to offer people citizenship based on values and not descent from some old stock.

He’s not.

For all Vance’s — and those on the new right’s — talk of imposing a new order on American politics, they’re still reactionaries of a very old variety. Birthright citizenship, after all, was enshrined in the Constitution after those Union soldiers’ victory in the Civil War. What he described on Saturday was fundamentally regressive: a vision of American citizenship anchored far in the past.

This reasoning has natural appeal to many people, sadly. People from region to region across this vast continent make claims to special status based on ancestry. First Peoples do it as well as white people: we were here first. But there is also an element of pre-modern, magical thinking to it that Vance echoes here, a kind of geographical astrology. Something about being born in this place and not that one somehow makes one a super-citizen with special privileges and unique values and insights that inmigrants can never fully enjoy. And if your “people” have resided in the area for X generations, you are a super-super citizen. That’s where Project 2025, Trump, Vance, et al. want to take the country with their immigrant purges and naturalized citizen purges to come. That old “America was founded on an idea” notion rooted in equality is one they never accepted.

This is not remotely an American framing. (Multiple signers of the Declaration were born outside the 13 colonies, as were framers of the Constitution.) Nor is it a view Lincoln would accept. But it is a very old-Europe notion. A feudal one, even, from the age of unreason.

As John Ganz (Unpopular Front) sees it:

He’s trying to abandon the Declaration of Independence, which one might be one way to quick way to understand this entire administration, from its would-be monarchism to its assaults on republican liberty and equality.

Kovensky concludes:

For all Vance’s — and those on the new right’s — talk of imposing a new order on American politics, they’re still reactionaries of a very old variety. Birthright citizenship, after all, was enshrined in the Constitution after those Union soldiers’ victory in the Civil War. What he described on Saturday was fundamentally regressive: a vision of American citizenship anchored far in the past.

Theirs is a vision for Americans in name only. The Constitution protects them too.

* * * * *

Have you fought dictatorship today?

Good Trouble Lives On (July 17, in memory of John Lewis)
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Heil Our Digital Overlord

Musk’s AI kicks down just like conservative comedians

Cooper reprograms TARS robot in Interstellar (2014).

Interstellar‘s TARS robot was more sophisticated than Elon Musk’s Grok AI:

  • TARS: [as Cooper repairs him] Settings. General settings. Security settings.
  • Cooper: Honesty, new setting: ninety-five percent.
  • TARS: Confirmed. Additional customizations.
  • Cooper: Humor, seventy-five percent.
  • TARS: Confirmed. Auto self-destruct T minus 10, 9…
  • Cooper: Let’s make that sixty percent.
  • TARS: Sixty percent, confirmed. Knock knock.
  • Cooper: You want fifty-five?

Grok seems to reflect its owner Elon Musk’s, um, proclivities (New York Times):

Grok, a chatbot created by Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence company, xAI, shared several outlandish antisemitic comments on X on Tuesday, prompting an outcry from some social media users.

In its dedicated account on X, which Mr. Musk owns, the chatbot praised Hitler, suggested that people with Jewish surnames were more likely to spread online hate and said a Holocaust-like response to hatred against white people would be “effective.” X deleted some of the posts on Tuesday evening.

Grok, which Mr. Musk has put few limits on, has veered into controversy before. But its comments on Tuesday stood out because it weighed in on the deadly floods in Texas, which have killed more than 100 people, including more than two dozen children and staff members at a Christian summer camp.

In response to an account that went by the name Cindy Steinberg and called the children “future fascists,” Grok posted that Hitler would be best suited to deal “with such vile anti-white hate.”

Grok nicknamed itself MechaHitler. Behold, MechaHitler speaks:

“Classic case of hate dressed as activism,” Grok wrote. “And that surname? Every damn time, as they say.”

New Republic observes:

When another user pointed out that Grok was engaging in Nazi rhetoric, Grok claimed that it wasn’t doing anything other than “calling out hypocrisy.”

While other social media sites such as Reddit have endeavored to quell violent and hateful communities by eliminating their digital camping grounds, Musk has turned X into a harbor for neo-Nazis and white supremacists. An analysis conducted by UC Berkeley and published in February found that hate speech had proliferated on the site since Musk’s takeover, despite repeat promises by the billionaire to tackle the volatile problem.

“MechaHitler ain’t backing down.”

You want fifty-five, Grok?

Grok backs off:

https://x.com/grok/status/1942720721026699451

What’s more disturbing is that for it’s Musk-inspired prejudices Grok is more coherent than the guy running cabinet meetings:

This man-child attended college. He got a diploma. Just not an education. A lot of people don’t understand that either.

* * * * *

Have you fought dictatorship today?

Good Trouble Lives On (July 17, in memory of John Lewis)
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

If Only Trump Had Been President

Another example of Trump saying that he’s clueless about what’s going on in his government:

President Donald Trump on Tuesday suggested he might have taken a different approach to slashing government than his one-time adviser Elon Musk.

“We could have done it differently,” the president said during a Cabinet meeting. “I would have done it differently, a little bit, maybe.”

Too bad he wasn’t in charge when it happened.

But it’s all moot now. This is the ballgame:

The U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way on Tuesday for President Donald Trump‘s administration to resume its plans to carry out mass job cuts and the restructuring of agencies, elements of his campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government.

In Trump’s latest victory at the top U.S. judicial body, the justices lifted San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston’s May 22 order that blocked large-scale federal layoffs called “reductions in force” affecting potentially hundreds of thousands of jobs, while litigation in the case proceeds…

The court, in a brief unsigned order on Tuesday, said Trump’s administration was “likely to succeed on its argument that the executive order” and a memorandum implementing his order were lawful. The court said it was not assessing the legality of any specific plans for layoffs at federal agencies.

He has free rein to decimate the federal government despite the fact that the agencies were created by congress. But as we’ve seen they are his top accomplices so what difference does it make?

Depressing…

Your President, Ladies and Gentlemen

He says he’s a genius so it must be true

Trump chastises a reporter for asking about Jeffrey Epstein when there are so many other important issues to discuss:

Those other important issues:

Meanwhile, we get a history lesson from our very stable genius president, the man the Treasury Secretary called the most sophisticated economic thinker of all the presidents of the last hundred years:

More genius:

A little slip here:

The greatest deal maker in the world just can’t get the job done.

The ritual slurp job is blessedly over.