Skip to content

Month: September 2025

Cronkite Turns Over In His Grave

Put a fork in it:

The new ownership of CBS News on Monday selected Kenneth R. Weinstein, a former chief executive of the Hudson Institute, a right-leaning policy think tank, to review complaints about its coverage in a new post as ombudsman at the network.

Mr. Weinstein, who has no experience overseeing news coverage, was an unexpected choice for the role. He will report to Jeff Shell, the new president of CBS’s parent company, Paramount, which recently merged with the Hollywood studio Skydance.

Installing an ombudsman at CBS News was one of Skydance’s commitments to the Trump administration this year when the company sought approval for its merger with Paramount.

Skydance’s founder, David Ellison, has pledged to revamp CBS News, which regularly lags ABC and NBC in the Nielsen ratings and recently endured a standoff with President Trump over accusations of editorial bias. Mr. Ellison is in talks to acquire The Free Press, an independent news outlet, and install its co-founder Bari Weiss in a senior editorial role at CBS News; last week, the network changed its rules for handling some political interviews after pressure from the Trump administration.

This is the Orban model. I suspect it’s only the beginning.

In case you don’t know about The Free Press it’s a vanity project by a bunch of “contrarians” who operate on behalf of the right-wing. You know the type.

It’s just sad…

What About Jeffrey’s Money?

Here’s a gift link to a long and important NYT article about Jeffrey Epstein’s relationship with his bank, JP Morgan. It doesn’t answer all the questions about Epstein’s money but it shows once again that he was fully enmeshed with some of the most powerful people in the world.

An excerpt:

Epstein’s crimes have been exhaustively documented, and elements of JPMorgan’s relationship with Epstein have become public via legal proceedings in the United States and Britain. But the full story of how America’s leading lender enabled the century’s most notorious sexual predator has not been told. This account has been pieced together from thousands of pages of internal bank records, sealed deposition transcripts and other court documents and financial data, as well as interviews with people with direct knowledge of the Epstein relationship. Among the findings: Bank officials for more than a decade were anxious about Epstein’s prolific wire transfers and cash withdrawals — JPMorgan ultimately processed more than $1 billion in such transactions for him — and warned senior management about his suspicious activities. But on at least four occasions over five years, the bank’s leaders overrode those objections and continued to serve Epstein.

They knew he was up to something nefarious. And if you read further you will see they knew about his proclivity for very young women and girls and many suspected there was criminality involved. But he had protectors and others who looked away. They wanted his business and some of them knew him intimately as friends.

Read it. You don’t have to be QAnon to be disturbed by this group of wealthy men and the women who serve them.

Knew You’d Want To See It

The winguts are saying that the signature doesn’t match because it has a tail.

It’s how he signs when he’s only using his first name — you know, with his good friends.

credit to Holly Allen on our art team (not on Bsky I don't think) I did not realize you could actually check the signature against _a different friendly note he wrote to Jeffrey Epstein_

Ben Mathis-Lilley (@benmathislilley.bsky.social) 2025-09-08T19:49:15.967Z

This is one of the Epstein Estate documents that have now been turned over to the Congressional Oversight Committee.

It’s him, no doubt about it. And it’s clear to me that it’s all about the women — obviously. Why else did he draw that picture? He says that they have things in common, secrets, and it has to do with “enigmas” (gamines) never aging.

He not only knew, he participated.

What Is Wrong With This Guy?

Scott Bessent seems like such a mild-mannered fellow when you see him lying on television. But apparently, he’s actually a macho thug with a violent streak.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent got into a heated confrontation with Federal Housing Finance Agency chief Bill Pulte last week at the Executive Branch, the MAGA-chic private club in D.C., Politico reports.

Bessent accused Pulte, the MAGA influencer ginning up mortgage fraud claims against Trump foes, of bad-mouthing him to Trump, leading to this diatribe from the sitting Treasury secretary: “Why the fuck are you talking to the president about me? Fuck you. I’m gonna punch you in your fucking face.”

Co-owner Omeed Malik attempted to intervene in the confrontation, prompting this memorable exchange:

“It’s either me or him,” Bessent said to Malik. “You tell me who’s getting the fuck out of here.”

“Or,” he added, “we could go outside.”

“To do what?” asked Pulte. “To talk?”

“No,” Bessent replied. “I’m going to fucking beat your ass.”

Even Trump-world insiders described the scene to Politico as “bonkers” and “unhinged.”

This is just weird. Recall that he also threatened Elon Musk in similar fashion shouting “fuck you, fuck you, fuck you” over who should be the head of the IRS. Apparently, they got right up in each other’s faces right there in the White House.

Bessent seems to need some anger management classes.

Reverting To Type

Yeah:

I mean, a man violently attacks and rapes his wife and they’re calling it a crime now? Come on.

Trump was saying that the crime statistics in DC are being rigged by counting bogus crimes like domestic abuse: “you know, they’ll do anything they can to find something.” He was complaining that he wasn’t allowed to claim that crime is down 100% instead of 87%. I’m not kidding.

By the way, he was speaking at the  Washington’s Museum of the Bible.

Your Chilling Thread O’ The Day

Brian Beutler correctly observes:

Maybe they’re working on it butmaybe they can’t get anyone to talk to them. Or maybe they’re just too scared.

It’s clear that Trump is just an imbecile as are many of the sycophants and toadies he surrounds himself with. Some have their own sociopathic agendas. But I suspect that there is a fairly strong faction that just thinks of all this as creative destruction to make way for the AI revolution.

Case in point:

Starting next year, through its implementation of the Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction (WISeR) Model, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will begin a pilot program that will import the prior authorization process to traditional Medicare plans in six states. The program will even employ artificial intelligence tools to decide whether those Medicare beneficiaries will receive the care physicians say they need.

Dr. Oz has said repeatedly that it’s your patriotic duty to stay healthy. If you don’t do that, why should the taxpayers pay for your health care? It’s as simple as that. These AI tools will make sure that 82 year olds on Medicare are good patriots before they are allowed to have an MRI to diagnose their back pain. Sure, maybe it’s cancer or maybe it’s arthritis or maybe a slipped disc. But if the patient hasn’t followed Dr. Oz’s MAHA recommendations, I’m afraid he’s going to be out of luck.

Here’s a little primer on Dr. Oz’s medical advice and recommendations which I’m sure will be fed into the new Medicare AI to diagnose whether we’re patriots or not.

Who needs a real government when you have Artificial Intelligence to run everything? Right? ….

That Orange Monster Is Taking Credit For Biden’s Infrastructure Act:

I guess we knew it was inevitable but it’s infuriating nonetheless:

In southern Connecticut, the federal government is replacing a 118-year-old bridge along America’s busiest rail corridor. The $1.3 billion project was largely funded by the 2021 infrastructure law that was championed by then-President Joseph R. Biden Jr. — and strenuously opposed by Donald J. Trump.

These days, however, motorists cruising by the construction site might be forgiven for thinking that a certain famous New York developer was responsible for it all.

“PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP” a sign by the road declares. “REBUILDING AMERICA’S INFRASTRUCTURE.”

In recent months, a number of similar signs have popped up in front of major infrastructure projects financed by the bipartisan 2021 legislation, a $1.2 trillion package that Mr. Trump, who left office in January of that year, had passionately railed against. He called the bill “a loser for the U.S.A.,” and warned that Republican lawmakers who signed on could be thrown out of office by angry primary voters. “Patriots will never forget!” he wrote.

The signs bearing Mr. Trump’s name now adorn bridge projects in Connecticut and Maryland; rail-yard improvement projects in Seattle, Boston and Philadelphia; and the replacement of a tunnel on Amtrak’s route between Baltimore and Washington, according to W. Kyle Anderson, a spokesman for the company.

In an email, Mr. Anderson said the new signs “are a voluntary Amtrak initiative, updating outdated signage posted at the project locations listed previously, following the change in presidential administrations earlier this year.”

The signs note, in a smaller font, that the projects in question are “funded by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act,” the official name of the legislation that Mr. Trump tried to derail.

Meanwhile, all these assholes are taking credit for it:

Last year, in the midst of election season, Politico compiled a list of a number of House Republicans who voted against the bill but went on to take credit for bringing projects funded by the legislation to their districts. Representative Nancy Mace, who is currently running for governor in her home state of South Carolina, called the bill a “socialist wish list,” but did not protest the millions of dollars it allocated to public transit upgrades in the Charleston area.

“What do you want me to do, turn my back on the Lowcountry when we get funding for public transit?” she said, when asked about the apparent contradiction, according to a local newspaper.

This just points out once again that there is much less political upside for delivering material gain to the voters than we think. Most don’t know who did it and those who do, don’t really care. Along comes a conman like Trump who takes credit and his minions benefit by lying that they it was their Dear Leader who led the way and at best it’s a wash.

Apparently the Biden administration put some similar signs up and the Republicans were furious. Ted Cruz reported it to the DOJ saying it violated the Hatch Act. He’s untroubled about this. And the Biden signs had the virtue of being true.

Trump’s Splendid Little War

America has never been even close to perfect, a fact which the Trump administration is going to great lengths to obscure. They insist that any mention of the country’s flawed history demeans and ignores what it has done right and therefore it must not be mentioned at all. In truth the president believes that the simplified “George Washington and the cherry tree” fables he learned as a boy in the 1950s is all anyone needs to know. The consequences of this ignorance are putting the country, and the entire world, in grave danger.

Setting aside his grade school level understanding of history, had Trump joined many of the rest of his generation in protesting the war in Vietnam, for instance, or his father had not arranged for him to get a fake medical deferment to avoid the draft, perhaps he would have a grasp of the folly that led to that tragic event which cost the lives of nearly 60,000 Americans and the lives of millions of Vietnamese, Laotians and Cambodians. And he would understand that creating a pretext for war leads to disaster.

The U.S. got militarily involved in Vietnam in the 1950s as part of the Cold War, anti-communist crusade coming out of the stalemate in Korea. The “domino theory” held that they had to stop the spread with Vietnam lest all the countries around it and eventually God knows how many other countries would fall over one-by-one.

By 1964, with “military advisers'” heavily involved in the civil war on the side of the South Vietnamese government against the communist insurgents of the North, it was foolishly decided that the U.S. needed to send troops into the country to put an end to it once and for all. So, they used two isolated incidents of North Vietnamese patrol boats attacking a Naval destroyer in the Gulf of Tonkin to justify it.

It was only later that the country learned that there had only been one incidental attack and the second was simply made up as a pretext to call it a provocation that required a massive U.S. response. President Johnson ordered U.S. Navy planes to bomb North Vietnamese torpedo boat bases and called on the Congress to authorize the use of force, which it did. Within a few months there were more than 100,000 troops on the ground in that small Southeast Asian country. We all know how it turned out.

Unfortunately, certain American leaders learned all the wrong lessons from that debacle. After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the government had little trouble getting approval to invade Afghanistan to go after the perpetrators. But they wanted to use the war fever gripping the country to invade Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks but which had been on the radar of a group of right wing hawks ever since the first Gulf War in 1991. They manipulated intelligence to create a pretext for war that was just as thin as the Tonkin Gulf resolution and after a lengthy and vociferous debate managed to get the Congress to once again authorize the use of force. We all know how that turned out too.

As bad as both of these infamous examples of government lying the nation into war were, they at least attempted to adhere to the idea that they were expected to follow international and domestic law and that they needed to go to Congress for authorization. It wasn’t much. They failed to get declarations of war as the Constitution requires. But they knew it was important to preserve the idea of an actual legal authority to use military force, however ludicrous it might be.

The Trump administration has decided that’s a waste of time. This president believes he has unlimited power, answerable to no one, and he is not required to even pretend that he needs any authority other than his own decree to do anything. That odious power grab has now escalated to military action.

Over the course of the last few weeks the administration has been gathering warships offshore of Venezuela in a major deployment and last week a U.S. Navy ship blew up a suspected drug-running boat off Venezuela, killing its crew of 11. The president proudly released the video of what can only be called a murder by the U.S. government posting on Truth Social that it was done “against positively identified Tren de Aragua Narcoterrorists.”

The “War on Drugs” has always been a metaphor, not a real military conflict. The government has authorized covert action over the years but officially it’s always been a law enforcement issue in which the Coast Guard would arrest suspected drug runners and turn them over to the authorities. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told the press that such interdiction doesn’t work: “What will stop them is when you blow them up…. Instead of interdicting it, on the president’s orders, we blew it up. And it’ll happen again. Maybe it’s happening right now.”

Experts in the laws of war are hard pressed to come up with any legal justification for this. Simply designating the Tren de Aragua gang a foreign terrorist organization doesn’t do it just because the administration says so. Invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 wouldn’t work either, especially since the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals just blocked it’s use for deportations holding that there is no “predatory incursion” or “invasion” by members of the gang. If it’s just about drug dealers, it’s a criminal matter and the U.S. has decided it has the right to summarily execute them without any due process, something that got former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte arrested by the Philippine National Police and Interpol in Operation Pursuit last March under an International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant charging him with crimes against humanity

Back in the day, the government would have said the boat tried to attack the American ship and it blew it up in self-defense. They aren’t bothering anymore with such old-fashioned justifications. When asked under what legal authority they took this action, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth simply said, “We have the absolutely and complete authority.” Vice President J.D. Vance was asked the same question gave an equally vacuous answer: “The legal authority is there are people who are bringing — literal terrorists — who are bringing deadly drugs into our country.”

Blowing up drug traffickers in waters off of Venezuela, saying they’re invading the United States is ridiculous. What makes more sense is that this is really a provocation to try to get Venezuela to attack one of the warships and set off a regime change operation. (Sound familiar at all?) Rubio has apparently been pushing for this large military deployment to pressure Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro (who currently has a $50 million bounty on his head.) Venezuela, after all, has a whole lot of oil and the peacenik Donald Trump has been itching for his own war for a very long time. Let’s just hope that Venezuela doesn’t take the bait.

Salon

Trump’s War On The Rule Of Law

There are no limits to what he’ll do

The World No Longer Takes Trump Seriously” tops a Friday article in The Atlantic by Tom Nichols. Donald J. Trump, a man very much “not in full,” a man who’s spent his entire adult life complaining that “the world is laughing at us” (him), finds himself dismissed as a clown by the very dictators club he is desperate to have welcome him. <sad trombone>

The harder Trump tries, the harder he fails. And the more damage he does to his “Make Me Great” agenda, the more Americans pay for it in loss of services and international respect.

Max Boot this morning examines Trump’s pointless, silly, and illegal procalamtion that he’s changed the name of The Department of Defense to the Department of War. This comes on the heels of the military strike last week that killed 11 on a speedboat in the Caribbean:

The strike is a troubling new chapter in a trend that began in 2001, and continued through Republican and Democratic administrations, with the United States employing missile and drone strikes to kill suspected terrorists without benefit of trial. The administration is piggybacking on that history by designating Tren de Aragua as a foreign terrorist organization. But calling it a terrorist group doesn’t automatically give the president the power to kill its purported members.

(Trump should instead go to a gun show and buy something in a larger caliber than his willy.)

Trump is now committing war crimes on top of human rights violations for which at minimum, in a just universe, an indictment from the International Criminal Court (ICC) would prevent him from visiting his extraterritorial properties should he leave office without (likely) facing U.S. indictments. <louder sad trombone>

Max Boot writes this morning:

Senior officials, indeed, seem to revel in their contempt for the rule of the law. Hegseth said on Friday that the “War Department” would be concerned with “maximum lethality, not tepid legality.” On Saturday, Vice President JD Vance, posting on X, called the strike on the alleged drug-smuggling boat “the highest and best use of our military.” When an online critic argued that “killing the citizens of another nation who are civilians without any due process is called a war crime,” Vance replied: “I don’t give a s— what you call it.”

In Trumpistan, the law is what Trump says it is.

Maybe there will be an ICC indictment in Vance’s future as well.

* * * * *

Have you fought dicktatorship today?

50501 
May Day Strong
No King’s One Million Rising movement
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Got Your DOJ Threat Yet?

It’s not just L.A. and Chicago

Don’t think AG Pam Bondi’s shock troops are focused solely on high-profile targets like large cities and name-brand universities. The Trump DOJ has given notice that any attempt by your local government to remedy harms to Black people from historic discrimination will be viewed as “unlawful race-based discrimination” against white people. DEI and all that.

This item popped up over the weekend from the Asheville Watchdog (byline Andrew R. Jones and Dan DeWitt):

Citing potential violations of federal civil rights laws, the U.S. Department of Justice has sent a letter to Buncombe County threatening to investigate and take enforcement against the county if it approves recommendations from the Asheville-Buncombe Community Reparations Commission, according to a DOJ letter obtained Friday by Asheville Watchdog.

The DEI police are here. Read the letter.

The letter dated Sept. 4 came one day after the Reparations Commission briefed Buncombe commissioners at their regular meeting about its final report. The commission was created in March 2022 as part of Asheville’s historic effort to provide reparations for Black residents who had suffered systemic racism across generations.

The final report included 39 recommendations in five areas: criminal justice, economic development, education, health and wellness, and housing.

“The U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division has recently become aware of concerning recommendations presented to you by the Asheville-Buncombe County Community Reparations Commission,” the DOJ letter read.

“After our initial review, we are deeply concerned that many of the recommendations, if implemented, would violate federal civil rights laws,” the letter continued, citing both the federal Fair Housing Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The DOJ refused comment on the letter.

The Reparations Commission report makes recommendations meant to “repair generations of harm experienced by Black residents across five key areas: criminal justice, education, housing, economic development, and health & wellness.” Can’t have any of that. Nope.

The Watchdog has more background.

Bullies gonna bully

Trump’s weaponized DOJ means to bully into submission (or into silence) those not in alignment with its Make America Great Again efforts to put certain people in their place.

Dwight Mullen, a retired University of North Carolina Asheville political science professor and the former chair of the Reparations Commission, said its recommendations were clearly supported by evidence generated in an exhaustive years-long process that included extensive community input as well as the hiring of a consultant to quantify the impact of racial injustice.

The findings also parallel a decade’s worth of reports researched and written by his students for the State of Black Asheville initiative.

“There’s consistency there, and the Trump administration has responded by, well, let’s cut off the data … because somehow that’s racist,” he said.

Still, Mullen said, his initial impulse is to advise the county to temporarily table the decision about whether to support the recommendations because the legal fight would sap the limited funds available to address the results of racial injustice.

“The resources we have can’t compare to the resources that can be marshaled by the federal government,” he said. “It’s an unfair fight.”

Pam Bondi is getting her crimestopping tips from Libs of TikTok.

One day before Dhillon issued her letter, she posted on X, “The folks in Buncombe County and Asheville NC have heard from @CivilRights tonight. If they pass an illegal, race-based program, they will Find Out … we are serious about ending DEI racism in America!” 

The post was in response to a post, tagged to Dhillon’s office, from the far-right Libs of TikTok’s account, which blasted the reparations commission’s proposals. 

“How is this real,” Libs of TikTok posted. “Asheville, NC passed a $2.9 million reparations policy. Includes free transportation only for Black pregnant women and funding for housing only for Black people. This isn’t legal!”

Asheville Watchdog is a nonprofit news team producing stories that matter to Asheville and Buncombe County. To show your support for this vital public service go to avlwatchdog.org/donate.

Coming soon? Casting a vote for a Democrat (especially a Black one) is discrimination against white Republicans.

Update: “Solely”

* * * * *

Have you fought dicktatorship today?

50501 
May Day Strong
No King’s One Million Rising movement
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense