Skip to content

Month: September 2025

The GOP’s Favorite Drug Dealer

We are hearing a whole lot of chest thumping from MAGA leadership these days about how America is declaring war on drug dealers. They have deployed Navy destroyers to patrol Venezuela ostensibly to root out the drug gangs that are killing Americans. That post above from JD Vance is a good example of the hysteria they’re ginning up. They’re literally making a case that they have the right to summarily execute anyone they think is a drug trafficker, no need for any proof because the danger is so extreme.

I’ve already written about one of Trump’s favorite despots, former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte, is now sitting in The Hague awitingtrail fro comes against humanity for doing exactly what Vance is crowing about. So there’s that.

There’s also this:

I asked why most [people at a Bitcoin conference] seemed enthusiastic about Trump. There was his increasing closeness to crypto-enthusiasts like Kennedy; his stated willingness to embrace crypto-friendly policy; and also, notably, his promise to release a now forty-year-old man from prison: Ross Ulbricht.

Ulbricht was pardoned last week, at the close of the second day of Trump’s Presidency, a day after Trump’s pardon of roughly fifteen hundred people involved in the January 6th insurrection. The delay had caused some of Ulbricht’s acolytes to worry. “People were posting in our chat, like, ‘O.K., there’s an hour and a half left of Day One . . . ’ ” Rich Clarke, the bitcoin meetup group’s organizer, who works in real estate, told me. “And a lot of my friends on Facebook were posting things like ‘Hope It Happens.’ ” He went on, “I think it was a shrewd move to pardon Ross sort of all on his own, after Trump did the mass pardons. It kind of gives the gesture more gravitas.”

In 2011, Ulbricht, an Eagle Scout from Austin, Texas, founded Silk Road, an online black market that existed until his arrest, in 2013, for crimes related to drug trafficking, money laundering, and computer hacking. According to authorities, more than a million transactions took place on Silk Road, out of the government’s regulatory reach, generating more than two hundred million dollars in revenue. Drugs like methamphetamine, cocaine, and heroin made up a huge portion of the site’s sales, from which Ulbricht apparently took millions in commissions. Silk Road “lowered the barriers to drug dealing by enabling drug dealers to reach customers online they could have never met on the street,” a federal prosecutor said in a closing argument. (Prosecutors also presented evidence that Ulbricht was involved in a murders-for-hire plot, but the government admitted that there was no evidence that the alleged targets had been harmed, and charges were not pursued.) In 2015, Ulbricht, who went by the dark-Web sobriquet Dread Pirate Roberts—a reference to a shifting character in “The Princess Bride”—received two life sentences without the possibility of parole.

Donald Trump, scourge of drug and sex traffickers, pardoned one of the most notorious drug and sex traffickers in modern history to fulfill his promise to Bitcoin bros in the campaign — and keep them on his side as he makes billions from his own crypto investments as president.

This is what he wrote on Truth Social when he signed the pardon:

“I just called the mother of Ross William Ulbright to let her know that in honor of her and the Libertarian Movement, which supported me so strongly, it was my pleasure to have just signed a full and unconditional pardon of her son, Ross. The scum that worked to convict him were some of the same lunatics who were involved in the modern day weaponization of government against me.”

Hey, he needed the votes and wanted to make some money. What else could he do?

And anyway, it’s not like he’s latino or Black so it’s fine. Carry on.

She Didn’t Lie

Yes, he is declaring war on an American city. Good times. She tried to warn America but they were obsessed by eggs and couldn’t hear it.

The Latest On Epstein

Seems like a lot….

Josh Marshall wrote something intriguing this morning that I highly suggest you read in its entirety. I don’t know quite what to make of it but it’s worth keeping in the back of your mind. An excerpt:

Yesterday Speaker Mike Johnson was on the Hill talking to reporters running Trump defense on the Epstein files. It sounds like pretty standard stuff — and then he says this: “When he first heard the rumor he kicked [Epstein] out of Mar-a-Lago. He was an FBI informant who tried to take this stuff down.” It’s an odd moment. Because Johnson says it in this kind of off-handed way and without explanation like it’s just one in a litany of talking points. But he clearly suggests that Trump played some role bringing about Epstein’s downfall, that he was an FBI informant who presumably told the authorities about Epstein’s sex crimes. The clip got a lot of attention on social media, unsurprisingly. One of Trump’s top surrogates is suggesting that far from being implicated in Epstein’s crimes, Trump is some secret good guy in the shadows, the guy who out of the limelight helped the authorities bring Epstein to justice.

Total fantasy, right?

Well, this reminded me of something I saw in one of those recent interviews with journalist Michael Wolff, who has been out in the media letting everyone know that he has some large quantity of taped interviews with Epstein from during Trump’s first presidency but before his rearrest and eventual suicide.

Wolff said that Epstein suspected that Trump was the guy who ratted him out to the authorities. So maybe some version of Johnson’s claim isn’t that far-fetched. But of course this isn’t actually exonerating at all. In fact, it implicates Trump about as badly as anything we’ve heard to date. You can’t tell what you don’t know. Trump was in a position to rat out Epstein because he knew all about his operation and had for years. They were close carousing buddies for years, partying and trying to one-up each other, competing to bed young women. Whether that also included girls under 18 for Trump we don’t know for certain. But we have abundant evidence about their carousing and bro-one-upsmanship with women just over 18. Even if he never touched a girl under 18, Trump clearly knew Epstein was. If he’s the one who ratted Epstein out to the authorities leading to his 2008 plea deal, that only confirms his knowledge more clearly.

But the details of why Trump appears to have turned on Epstein are key too. Wolff lays out the details starting just after minute 32 in this interview, which you can watch on Youtube. There’s a lot going on here. So I’ll try to walk you through the key points. (For more detail and flavor, I strongly recommend watching that five or six minute part of the interview.)

Of course he knew all about it. He was part of it. We’ve seen the video of him at the party with Epstein macking on the young cheerleaders at Mar-a-lago. This was supposedly in 2000. Maybe none of those girls were under 18 but plenty were probably right around that age — the age of Don Jr and Ivanka. Trump would have been 53 at the time.

He was friends with Epstein for 15 years, during which time they both owned model agencies, which were nothing more than a form of slavery with plenty of rumors about sex trafficking in that business. Trump’s employed plenty of underage girls.

Marshall speculates about the Trump Epstein breakups and presents a case that Trump might very well have dropped a dime on his good buddy when they fell out over a potential money laundering scheme around a very expensive piece of property. This might explain a bit about the sweetheart deal Epstein ended up getting — bodies buried etc. Any, well worth reading the whole thing.

I can’t stress this point enough: You can’t tell what you don’t know. This isn’t an accusation. It’s formal logic. So even if we accept the idea that Trump played a role in Epstein’s downfall, it’s not exonerating. It shows what we’ve long suspected: that Trump had known about Epstein’s operation for years and was fine with it. (That’s assuming for the moment he wasn’t a direct participant — it’s the weekend, I’m being generous.) He only made a call when Epstein was threatening to expose a money laundering scheme.

Wolff said this a few weeks ago, apparently on the basis of recorded interviews from 2018 and 2019. But last night I saw a few articles from that period that strongly hinted at something like this. So I suspect reporters had heard something about this but couldn’t quite nail it down. In other words, I think this has been known as a rumor at least for some time.

So why did Johnson say this?

It’s conceivable, I guess, that he was just riffing and that there’s nothing to it. But that’s a helluva riff. I don’t think you’re just spitballing and land on the idea that the president of the United States was a confidential source who had inside knowledge and started the Epstein investigation. My best guess is that Johnson said this because Epstein was right and Trump did rat him out to the authorities. But as we said, this is not a good story for Trump, so why say it? Again, the best explanation is that it’s in those files the DOJ is sitting on. The White House fears it’s going to come out and so they’re putting the best spin on it they can. Trump was a real life Bruce Wayne type richie, wheeling and dealing by day, helping the authorities take down bad guys in the shadows. With Trump’s most ardent supporters, they might get some traction with that. But again, as noted above, it’s actually super damning. Yeah I knew he was a big time pedophile and we were big pals and partied together all the time and I was fine with it. But then he tried to expose my money laundering scheme so I called my friends at the FBI. I don’t think that’s a great story.

I think the money laundering angle might just be one of the incentives to keep this whole thing under wraps as well.

Interesting stuff. I don’t know if we’re going down more rabbit holes or not and if I had to guess, none of this is going to see the light of day unless there is a wholesale change in the government and our political system. Stranger things have happened I guess.

They Think They Don’t Have To Pay Taxes

This woman believes that Trump signed an executive order eliminating all taxes for anyone who makes under $120,000 a year:

When I saw this I wondered if this was a common delusion among the MAGA cultists. It turns out that it is. She got the number wrong but it didn’t come out of nowhere. This is from last February:

The Trump administration’s latest tax policy quasi-proposal, announced by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick in an interview with CBS News, is for the elimination of taxes for folks making less than $150,000 per year.

Obviously, Trump can’t actually sign an executive order to do such a thing but he could certainly put on one of his little shows and pretend he can. So far, he hasn’t done that. His rationale is that THE TARIFFS!!! will bring in so much money we won’t really need an income tax again. Of course, we’ll be paying for those too but whatevs…

Ok. But this woman should consider this before she gets behind that idea:

If, along with extending the TCJA tax cuts that disproportionately benefit high-income earners, the Trump administration intends to eliminate the income tax for individuals making less than $150,000, it raises the obvious question of who will be left shouldering the tax burden. The answer is either the middle class or no one—because both Social Security and Medicare will be shut down.

Back in the alleged golden era before there was an income tax which we didn’t have such things as social security and Medicare. Most old people died in penury and they died much younger. But that seems to be the plan. Just look at “MAHA.” If they have their way, most of the worker drones will be killed by the next pandemic so we won’t have to worry about it.

I think what is most astonishing about people like the woman in that video is that she’s so very sure of herself. I think that’s what MAGA has given her — confidence that her instincts are correct and a feeling of belonging to a large group of people who agree. It’s too bad her instincts are so wrong and that her arrogance is going to destroy her — and the rest of us too. I hate to say it but I think that’s part of the appeal. She may go down but as long as we go down too, it’s worth it.

Waah!!!!

He is just so depressed these days. Even his BFF Kim Jong Un has betrayed him. Sad!

He’ll always have Bolsonaro…

We Feel You, Andy

Mommy always said there were no monsters

Via Yahoo News:

A terrified young boy from Firth, Idaho, burst into tears, in video captured by his mother, after learning that President Donald Trump was real.

This video, filmed by Annabelle Dalley, shows her young son Andy asking, “Is Donald Trump a real person?” with tears in his eyes.

“Yes Donald Trump is a real person,” Dalley answers, before her son erupts in tears.

“Andy was watching videos on YouTube, realized he is of Mexican culture and was in fear of being deported due to Trump being the president,” Dalley told Storyful.

“Andy was born here!”

Not that it will matter.

>

Recall this scene from Aliens (1986)?

Newt: My mommy always said there were no monsters – no real ones – but there are.
Ripley: Yes, there are, aren’t there?
Newt: Why do they tell little kids that?
Ripley: Most of the time it’s true.

This is not one of those times.

(h/t NMB)

* * * * *

Have you fought dicktatorship today?

50501 
May Day Strong
No King’s One Million Rising movement
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

America Rising

Coax them off their couches

Donald Trump paused last week from adding more tacky, gold-painted plastic accents from Home Depot to the walls of the Oval Office. He announced he’d changed the name of the Department of Defense to the Department of War (which he can’t legally do without an act of Congress).

“We’re going to go on offense, not just on defense,” boozy Secretary of Whatever Pete Hegseth told reporters. Trump is offensive, all right, and clearly fantasizing about having troops shoot Americans in the streets of Chicago to show he means business. Not economic business. He’s trashing that.

But Trump could fill the White House with black velvet art and talk out of a bruised hand puppet and MAGA Republicans would smile and praise him like Peter Falk does the dictator in The In-Laws (1979). The 25th Amendment will not save us.

The spirit of 1776 has been dormant for the longest time. But if Trump succeeds in anything positive in his second term, it may be in awakening it.

Americans filled the streets of Washington, D.C. and Chicago on Saturday to protest Trump’s federal takeover of the District on the pretext of fighting crime. But you’d have to look below the fold of the Washington Post to know it. The New York Times is keeping its masthead down as well. So is The Los Angeles Times.

So from The Associated Press:

Thousands of protesters marched across Washington, D.C., on Saturday in one of the largest demonstrations against President Donald Trump’s federal takeover of policing in the nation’s capital.

Behind a bright red banner reading “END THE D.C. OCCUPATION” in English and Spanish, protesters marched over two miles from Meridian Hill Park to Freedom Plaza near the White House to rail against the fourth week of National Guard troops and federal agents patrolling D.C.’s streets.

The “We Are All D.C.” protest — put together by local advocates of Home Rule and the American Civil Liberties Union — was perhaps the most organized demonstration yet against Trump’s federal intervention in Washington. The president justified the action last month as a way to address crime and homelessness in the city, even though city officials have noted that violent crime is lower than it was during Trump’s first term in office.

I’ll get to why big-city protests won’t save us either in a moment. First some images.

District of Columbia

People from all over are showing up for DC. This is not a moment. It’s a movement. We are united in our demands. We are all DC! #FreeDC

Free DC (@freedcproject.bsky.social) 2025-09-06T18:08:27.816Z

This protest is larger than his inauguration. 🤣

Raider (@iwillnotbesilenced.bsky.social) 2025-09-07T00:40:05.758Z

“This is no longer just a march—this is a movement,” tweets Brian Allen. Let’s hope he’s right.

Chicago

The Associated Press has an extensive photo galley here.

The streets of Chicago are full with tens of thousands of people standing up to ICE and Trump.

Join us.

[image or embed]

— Kat Abughazaleh (@katmabu.bsky.social) September 6, 2025 at 7:53 PM

Tonight's protest march in Chicago really benefiting from golden hour.

Dave Byrnes (@djbyrnes1.bsky.social) 2025-09-06T23:20:57.815Z

Now what?

Heather Cox Richardson observes:

Trump’s threats against American citizens are outrageous, but they also feel desperate. Trump’s popularity is tanking, the economy is faltering, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is facing a chorus of calls to resign or be fired, and the American people are taking to the streets. Thousands of people turned out today in Washington, D.C., for the “We Are All D.C.” march to protest the presence of troops in the city, and in Chicago for the “Chicago Says No Trump No Troops” protest. The protests are notable for the seas of signs the peaceful protesters carry.

All that is fine. But note that major national news outlets gave the protests the big ignore.

I attended a weekly protest in Hendersonville, NC a few weeks ago. About two dozen people. Two German tourists who stopped by were astonished that weekly protests were occurring in small towns across America. All they see is coverage of the big events, and as Saturday’s protest coverage shows, not much of that.

A friend at a political event last night (my fourth of the day) had just come from an organizing meeting where their national group was considering mounting a big rally in Washington, D.C. Considering the one-and-done nature of such events, perhaps more (and weekly) local events are more productive. To push back on Trump, people have to take to the streets in numbers not seen since the Women’s March.

And not the usual suspects who always take to the streets. The sort of people who’ve never protested must start. For that, they must overcome their reluctance and get the message that, yes, the country is in crisis. They must see that people like them, you, people from their neighborhoods, take Trump 2.0’s actions seriously enough make enough noise to get noticed. If we believe the nation is in crisis, clicktivism and writing your representatives is not enough. Your neighbors don’t see that. Back up words with public actions. Throw a better party. Make it easier for the couch-sitters to say, “I’ll have what she’s having.”

* * * * *

Have you fought dicktatorship today?

50501 
May Day Strong
No King’s One Million Rising movement
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Book of Saturday, Chapter IV: A Chillaxing Mixtape

It’s been another one of those news cycles, hasn’t it? Believe me…I feel your pain.

So stop doomscrolling already, grab your favorite tranquilizer (prescription or otherwise), don a pair of noise cancelling ‘phones and settle back for another one of my chillaxing “Book of Saturday” mixtapes (vol. 4, if you’re counting). I’ve sequenced the songs in a manner designed to evoke and sustain a particular mood-so for maximum effect, may I suggest that you listen to it in order. And remember, I am not a licensed music therapist, I just play one on TV.

Peace.

Ultra Vivid Scene – “Mirror to Mirror”

Pink Floyd – “Remember a Day”

John Foxx – “Europe After the Rain”

The Cleaners From Venus – “Girl on a Swing”

New Musik – “This World of Water”

Wire – “Map Ref 41 Degrees N 93 Degrees W”

Fous de la Mer – “Watersong”

Steve Hackett – “Icarus Ascending”

Kevin Kendle – “Cumulus”

Cocteau Twins – “Lazy Calm”

Robin Trower – “Daydream”

Greenslade – “Bedside Manners Are Extra”

Emerson, Lake, & Palmer – “From the Beginning”

Jakko – “Dangerous Dreams”

The Apartments – “Things You’ll Keep”

The Go-Betweens – “The Streets of Your Town”

Jay Semko – “dueSouth Theme”

Jethro Tull – “Skating Away on the Thin Ice of the New Day”

John Martyn – “Over the Hill”

Family – “Observations from a Hill”

Peter Gabriel – “Solisbury Hill”

Pete Townshend – “Pure and Easy”

Camel – “Highways of the Sun”

Gil Scott-Heron – “I Think I’ll Call it Morning”

Gordon Lightfoot – “Beautiful”

Previous posts with related themes:

Book of Saturday

Book of Saturday II

Book of Saturday III

More at Den of Cinema

Dennis Hartley

I’m Sure This Is On The Up And Up

NBC News reports on a couple of Epstein co-conspirators:

The Justice Department on Friday asked a federal judge overseeing the case of deceased sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein to deny a request from NBC News to unseal the names of two associates who received large payments from him in 2018, court documents show. The Justice Department cited privacy concerns expressed by the two individuals as the reason for not making their names public.

The first associate received a payment of $100,000 from Epstein and the second associate received a payment of $250,000, both in 2018, days after the Miami Herald began publishing a series of investigative stories where victims criticized a plea deal he received in Florida in 2008.

As part of the plea agreement, Epstein secured a statement from federal prosecutors in Florida that the two individuals would not be prosecuted.

The payments became public after Epstein was indicted and arrested in New York in 2019 and asked to be released on bail. Federal prosecutors in New York filed a memorandum on July 16, 2019, that argued Epstein should remain in jail to prevent him from tampering with witnesses.

No idea who these people are but from the sound of it one of them is Ghislaine Maxwell. If it is, then they really are giving her extra special treatment — again. The other is a mystery. The fact that the DOJ is protecting these people still, even in light of this scandal continuing to blow up suggests that they are either friends with Trump or could implicate him. Why else would they do it? They certainly don’t care about ethics.

Trump Declares War On Everything

He’s febrile and stimulated about killing his enemies, foreign and domestic. And that means pretty much all those who aren’t crawling on their bellies to pledge fealty and lick his boots.

Trump says that the U.S has lost every war since WWII. (I guess the Cold War is chopped liver — but then he loves Russia, so I guess that was a loss in his mind too.) And it’s all because we went “wokey.” He’s apparently referring to that hippie Harry Truman who desegregated the armed services. If he has his way he’d reverse that order too, no doubt.

Garrett Graff wrote about about how Trump is tearing down the entire post-war order in a great piece in his newsletter (highly recommended.)

The DoD name change hits at two of my consistent themes: Trump’s utter incurious lack of understanding history and the dismantling of the institutions built and tended by the Greatest Generation. 

The War Department was one of the first parts of the US government, dating back to 1798, but what it really oversaw was just the army; there was a separate Department of the Navy, which was also established in 1798, was the only military branch specifically authorized in the Constitution, by Article I, Section 8, and which also oversaw the Marines Corps. The Founders were, for obvious reasons, deeply wary of standing armies, and so the goal and plan for most of the country’s history was that while we always had a Department of the Navy chugging along, the “War Department” shrunk down massively in peacetime and only really bulked up during, well, an actual war. At the end of the 1800s, the US army was just 39,000 people — about 1/12th the size of the French army — and even on the eve of World War II, the US army ranked only 19th in the world, smaller than the standing army of Portugal. 

It was after World War II that the US began to think differently about its world obligations and what that meant for the military. Part of the problem was that there was no combined authority who oversaw the whole military other than the commander-in-chief himself — through the war, the army chief of staff, Gen. George C. Marshall, and chief of naval operations, Adm. Ernest J. King, were co-equals, reporting to separate secretaries, War Secretary Henry Stimson and Navy Secretary Frank Knox and, after 1944, James Forrestal. It didn’t make for a very smooth coordinated operation, since the different services and departments had different service priorities.

After the war, policymakers began to talk about a new concept they called “national security.” As I wrote in my book RAVEN ROCK, previous generations of policymakers had used terms like “national interest” or “national defense,” but the idea of “national security” presaged something bigger and grander: It wasn’t enough to be confident that an enemy could be stopped at the border — the United States needed to engage with the world beyond and stop threats long before they reached our shores. “Our national security can only be assured on a very broad and comprehensive front. I am using the word ‘security’ here consistently and continuously rather than ‘defense,’” Navy Secretary James Forrestal explained in one 1945 congressional hearing.

 “I like your words ‘national security,’” Senator Edwin Johnson responded.

As the Cold War started, Congress passed the National Security Act of 1947, which created a unified structure known as the National Military Establishment, which brought together the War Department and the Navy Department, created a new Department of the Air Force, as well created the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the National Security Council, the CIA, and other hallmarks of our postwar national security apparatus. For the first time, all of the nation’s armed services were under the same roof and authority. Two years later, the so-called “NME” was renamed officially the Department of Defense, in part — allegedly — because the acronym sounded too much like the word “enemy.”  

The Department of Defense was something new — it wasn’t “just” a new name for the Department of War. It was fundamentally different, had a different posture, and was meant to capture a different, larger role for the United States in the world. Changing the name to the “War Department” simply because Trump thinks it sounds cooler is a complete waste of everyone’s time and energy — and, moreover, seems certain to make the US less safe, as the aggressiveness of the new name seems certain to only underscore our adversaries’ worst fears about us.

Devolving the “Department of Defense” to the “Department of War” feels like renaming the “Transcontinental Railroad” to the “Pony Express.” Sure, they’re both “ways to send news and information across the country,” but it’s a term from a different era that referred to a different, lesser thing entirely. Maybe more romantic? Maybe. But also anachronistic and incomplete.

Yes, it’s ahistorical. anachronistic and incomplete to say the least. And mind bogglingly stupid. Here’s our “Secretary of War”:

Hegseth: The war department is going to fight decisively, not endless conflicts. It’s going to fight to win, not not to lose. We’re going to go on offense, not just on defense. Maximum lethality, not tepid legality. Violent effect, not politically correct. We’re going to raise up warriors, not just defenders.

Hooah…