Skip to content

Month: September 2025

Crazy Time

I have no idea what’s going on but Trump posted this Looney Tunes AI video on Truth Social last night for some reason. It’s completely daft:

Update: They have deleted it from Truth Social but it’s already everywhere, especially in QAnon circles where the people are ecstatic.

“Medbeds” are a big QAnon thing.

In a popular QAnon chat group, a woman named Julie was selling hope and a $22,000 cancer treatment.

For “those interested in medbeds,” she wrote in a 36,000-member QAnon group on the chat platform Telegram, “FYI My husband uses a #medbed generator and 4 tesla biohealers for his stage 3 inoperable and aggressive salivary gland tumor. THIS technology is very supportive!”

The message might have sounded like gibberish to outside readers. But in this corner of the internet, where conspiracy theories and alternative health practices run wild, it suggested something barely short of a miracle: the arrival of a much-hyped device that followers think could treat aggressive cancer.

An increasingly popular conspiracy theory falsely centers around the existence of “med beds,” a fabled medical instrument that does everything from reversing aging to regrowing missing limbs. The theory has grown in popularity among followers of far-right movements like QAnon, some of whom claim to be urgently awaiting a med bed to treat severe health conditions.

Some companies are capitalizing on the sudden demand. Julie, the woman advertising her husband’s med bed treatment in QAnon chat groups, is not an impartial med bed fan, but a marketer for Tesla BioHealing, one of multiple companies selling what they describe as “med beds,” sometimes for tens of thousands of dollars. The company credits its technology to a doctor who has previously been accused by the Federal Trade Commission of misleading advertisements for asthma treatments, and whose previous company board issued a resolution accusing him of sabotage, forgery, and sending company money to an online girlfriend.

The med bed conspiracy theory “serves two prophetic purposes,” said Sara Aniano, a Monmouth University graduate student who studies the rhetoric of the far right and has documented the spread of the med bed myth.

One of those prophecies promises a near future in which big pharmaceutical companies are obsolete. “Then of course there’s the more obvious appeal of having a magical machine, versions of which can diagnose you instantly or heal you instantly,” Aniano told The Daily Beast. “Some can grow back missing body parts instantly. So obviously, there’s a lot of hope that serves a very appealing narrative for those who believe this.”

Some QAnon sects have made med beds central to their conspiratorial claims. A Dallas-based group, which follows the Q influencer Michael “Negative 48” Protzman, has promoted med beds, in part because the devices address a plot hole in another conspiracy theory. The group falsely believes that John F. Kennedy is still alive and youthful, and attributes his remarkable longevity to the curative powers of med beds.

Ivermectin Fans Are Back With Even Weirder Drugs for Your COVID

Romana Didulo, a QAnon-adjacent conspiracy leader who claims to be the rightful “queen” of Canada, has also hyped med beds. The devices “will be made available for FREE to all Canadians” following her revolution, she wrote in an August post. Followers of YamatoQ, a Japan-based QAnon movement, have also latched onto med bed theories, even making their own attempted version of the device with copper wires.

Some conspiracy theorists believe Trump is aware of med beds, and can release them to the public. Delays in the prophesied technology (like one frustrated Q fan noted in an open letter to Trump last year) have led some to speculate that Trump is reserving the devices for the most critical cases, and for military members.

There’s more at the link. It’s truly wacko stuff. And Trump put up a fake video saying that he was creating a whole new, free medical system featuring these medbeds. Why?

You have to read this story about a MAGA cultist living all the way down the rabbit hole who believes in the medbed. (gift link) It’s actually quite sad. The man’s in a lot of pain and he’s being conned. I guess he isn’t the first.

I have no idea if Trump actually posted that or some crazy staff member did it. Was his feed hacked? I know he doesn’t know how to embed a video, much less put together a phony AI clip and I don’t know why he’d have to do that. It’s very strange. But then his Truth Social feed is getting more and more out there every day.

What did he mean by this one? Was it an order? A joke? What?

Presidential Daily Griefing

The grabber-in-chief hates being grabbed

All the president’s henchmen and henchwomen are furiously at work dismantling the country we once knew. So when anyone characterizes this or that presidential daily griefing merely as a distraction from Epstein files news, know that Donald J. Trump’s mob can Truth and chew democracy at the same time.

Sadly, they are hard at both. But let’s get to Friday’s Epstein news first. Then we’ll get to the destructive distractions.

Oversight Democrats Release Third Batch of Documents from Jeffrey Epstein Estate, Includes Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Steve Bannon, Prince Andrew Mentions

Washington, D.C. — Today, Democrats on the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released partial records from the third batch of documents produced by the Jeffrey Epstein Estate, which includes phone message logs, copies of flight logs and manifests for aircrafts, copies of financial ledgers, and Epstein’s daily schedule. The documents produced to the public include mentions of possible contact between Jeffrey Epstein and prominent figures like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Steve Bannon, and Prince Andrew. Further review of the documents, which were redacted to protect the identity of victims, is ongoing.

“It should be clear to every American that Jeffrey Epstein was friends with some of the most powerful and wealthiest men in the world. Every new document produced provides new information as we work to bring justice for the survivors and victims. Oversight Democrats will not stop until we identify everyone complicit in Epstein’s heinous crimes. It’s past time for Attorney General Bondi to release all the files now,” said Oversight Spokesperson Sara Guerrero.

Within documents of Epstein’s schedule, there is evidence that Thiel and Bannon had scheduled meetings with Epstein, as well as evidence of a pending trip by Elon Musk to Epstein’s island. Prince Andrew is listed as a passenger on Epstein’s aircraft, with financial disclosures providing possible evidence of payments from Epstein to masseuses on behalf of an individual identified as  “Andrew.” Extensive redactions have been made to protect victims as Committee investigators continue to analyze the new documents. This is a rolling production, and the Committee expects to receive more documents in response to these and other requests. 

In the third batch, the Oversight Committee received 8,544 documents responsive to the Committee’s subpoena from August. The following was received: 

  • Phone Message Logs from 2002-2005, which were produced previously in litigation
  • Copies of flight logs and flight manifests for aircraft, including helicopters, that Mr. Epstein owned, rented, leased, operated or used from 1990-2019
  • Copies of ledgers reflecting transactions recorded as cash transactions for Mr. Epstein and business entities. These documents were previously shown to Committee staff at in camera review.
  • Epstein’s daily schedules between 2010 and 2019 

Politico:

“It should be clear to every American that Jeffrey Epstein was friends with some of the most powerful and wealthiest men in the world,” said Sara Guerrero, a spokesperson for Oversight Democrats, in a statement. “Every new document produced provides new information as we work to bring justice for the survivors and victims.”

Musk, Bannon and a press contact for Thiel’s foundation did not immediately return a request for comment.

A GOP spokesperson for the Oversight panel blasted the Democrats’ decision to release information unilaterally.

In other words, don’t distract from our distractions, Democrats. As in….

Trump last week destroyed what was left of the country’s international reputation in his speech at the U.N. He lost a First Amendment fight with Jimmy Kimmel. He installed a former Miss Colorado contestant and insurance attorney as the acting United States attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. Lindsey Halligan signed off on a wafer-thin indictment of former FBI director James Comey when no other attorney in her branch would.

The BBC reports:

Donald Trump has ordered the deployment of troops to Portland, Oregon, authorising use of “full force” if needed, to suppress protests targeting immigration detention centres.

The US president claimed the move would help protect “any of our ICE Facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists”, characterising the city as “War ravaged” in a Truth Social post.

People in Portland are flooding social media with dispatches from their “war ravaged” city. “Donald J. Trump’s latest use of the military against US citizens backfired spectacularly on Saturday after Federal troops arrived in Portland, Oregon and immediately formed indie bands,” quipped satirist Andy Borowitz.

Hey, Grok?

* * * * *

Have you fought dicktatorship today?

50501 
May Day Strong
No King’s One Million Rising movement – Next national day of protest Oct. 18
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

January 6 Is The New Lost Cause

The showman will mount show trials

Last October, someone beat the UDC to erecting a monument to January 6 insurrectionists. The plaque reads: “This memorial honors the brave men and women who broke into the United States Capitol on January 6th, 2021, to loot, urinate, and defecate throughout those hallowed halls in order to overturn an election. President Trump celebrates these heroes of January 6th as ‘unbelievable patriots’ and ‘warriors.’ This monument stands as a testament to their daring sacrifice and last legacy.”

There is a “The South will rise again” vibe to all things MAGA. Donald Trump means to have his revenge on all (in his mind) “what done him wrong.” Anyone and everyone associated with the Russia investigation and Trump’s impeachments must pay, starting with former FBI director James Comey. Vindictive prosecution, you say? You damn betcha. The January 6 insurrection sparked by Trump himself that we all watched live on television must be recast as the War of Deep State Aggression. The United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) will start erecting a new set of monuments to the valorous MAGA combatants.

But first, MAGA Republicans on a new House panel will rewrite the history of the day (Politico):

It’s the latest sign that the deadly riot remains a wound on Congress that might never fully heal amid ferocious partisan sparring. Retribution, not reconciliation, appears to be the prime motivation behind the new probe, with the Republicans behind it still bitter over the work of the panel’s previous iteration, which was largely led by Democrats and concluded President Donald Trump was singularly to blame for the violence inflicted by his supporters.

One GOP member of the new panel, Louisiana Rep. Clay Higgins, did not rule out questioning members of the prior committee.

“They were not invested in actual investigative work anyway,” said Higgins, who has pushed an unfounded theory that FBI agents helped coordinate the events at the Capitol. “That thing was never legitimate. It was always biased. And therefore, if we question them, it may be with the angle of having them implicate themselves in lies that they presented as truth.”

“The past was alterable. The past never had been altered. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia.”

― George Orwell, 1984

Georgia Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R) is “talking to different entities” and reviewing documents for potential targets of the new investigation. “We need to look at it from a factual standpoint,” he told Politico.

The history of the day must be deodorized to remove the stink from Trump and the roughly 1,500 convicted participants he pardoned and characterized as “political prisoners.”

That previous select committee concluded that Trump’s incendiary rhetoric, and months of false claims to sow doubt about his defeat in the 2020 election, inflamed his supporters shortly before he directed them to march on the Capitol. But the review also acknowledged that Capitol security officials were underprepared for the onslaught, leading to the breach of the building and several near-confrontations between rioters and lawmakers.

“They can’t even seem to settle on which conspiracy theory they want to advance,” said Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, who served on the previous Jan. 6 panel and serves on the new one. “Was it Antifa? Did it not happen at all? Did Donald Trump really win the election? They can’t figure out what it is they want to say, and it’s because it’s just a tissue of lies and conspiracy theories.”

Raskin is on Trump’s list. As is New York Attorney General Letitia James and Sen. Adam Schiff. The showman will have his show trials. Convictions are a bonus for Trump. It is enough that he will drag his enemies through the mud and damage their reputations and family finances. He wants them to hurt.

Trump’s list of targets is growing:

The White House released a list of nearly 30 elected officials — all of them Democrats — who the Trump administration said incited violence against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents throughout the U.S.

[…]

The White House named the following elected officials on the list, as well as quoted each of them:

  • Gov. Tim Walz smeared ICE as the “modern-day Gestapo.”
  • Gov. Gavin Newsom likened ICE to “secret police,” calling them “authoritarian” and proclaiming a “right to push back.”
  • Gov. JB Pritzker claimed the country is becoming “Nazi Germany” because ICE is “grabbing people off the street and disappearing them.”
  • Rep. Robin Kelly smeared ICE as the “Gestapo” and a “betrayal.”
  • Rep. Jasmine Crockett compared ICE to “slave patrols.”
  • Rep. Sylvia Garcia referred to ICE agents as “thugs.”
  • Rep. Delia Ramirez attacked ICE as “a terror force.”
  • Rep. Pramila Jayapal called ICE agents “deranged,” accused them of “kidnapping,” and said “resistance” to ICE is “inspiring.”
  • Rep. Rashida Tlaib said ICE is “terrorizing our communities” and “turning our country into a fascist police state,” and called it a “rogue agency.”
  • Rep. Ayanna Pressley said ICE is “terrorizing our communities.”
  • Rep. Max Frost compared ICE operations to “some of the worst horrors and crimes against humanity” in history.
  • Rep. John Larson said ICE is “the SS” and “the Gestapo.”
  • Rep. LaMonica McIver incited people to “shut down the city” because “we are at war.”
  • Rep. Stephen Lynch smeared ICE agents as “the Gestapo” and “nondescript thugs.”
  • Rep. Dan Goldman compared federal agents to “secret police” who must be unmasked.
  • Rep. Becca Balint called ICE agents “vigilantes” who can’t be trusted.
  • Rep. Ilhan Omar said ICE agents are “vile and beyond cruel,” and that the agency should be abolished.
  • Rep. Nikki Budzinski called ICE agents “dangerous and reckless.”
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders asked people to “figure out a way to stop ICE from what they are doing as soon as possible.”
  • Sen. Elizabeth Warren claimed ICE is “intentionally stok[ing] fear” and “tear[ing] communities apart.”
  • Rep. Hakeem Jeffries implored people to “fight” the Trump Administration “in the streets” and declared ICE agents “will be unsuccessful” in protecting their identities “no matter what it takes.”
  • Boston Mayor Michelle Wu compared ICE agents to the neo-Nazi group NSC-131.
  • Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson accused ICE of being “secret police” who are “terrorizing our communities.”
  • Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass spread a disgusting, fabricated hoax that ICE “kidnapped” a woman on her way to work.
  • Rep. Gil Cisneros claimed ICE has “terrorized” people through “racial profiling.”
  • Rep. Eric Swalwell said it was his “priority” to ensure ICE agents “are no longer faceless,” comparing them to “some 1800s bank robber or some KGB officer in Russia.”
  • Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said ICE “should not exist.”
  • Rep. Kweisi Mfume challenged the Trump Administration to “a street fight.”
  • Rep. Jerry Nadler accused ICE agents of “hiding misbehavior because otherwise why would they be wearing masks?”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Bluesky account issued a statement:

The White House knows exactly what it was doing when they published a list of Democrats who have used their voice to call out Trump & Miller’s ICE abuses.

The list is now being used by the far right as an enemies list. It’s reckless. It’s dangerous. And it puts lives at risk.

Again: MAGA disciples who once raged at Hillary Clinton over her deplorables comment bristle today at comparisons to 1930s Germany. Just not enough to reconsider behaviors that evoke them.

* * * * *

Have you fought dicktatorship today?

50501 
May Day Strong
No King’s One Million Rising movement – Next national day of protest Oct. 18
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Singin’ the Blus: This is Spinal Tap, Breaking Glass, & Slade in Flame reissued

“May I start by saying how thrilled we are to have you here. We are such fans of your music and all of your records. I’m not speaking of yours personally, but the whole genre of the rock and roll.”

– Lt. Hooksratten (played by Fred Williard), from This is Spinal Tap

Hello, Cleveland! May I start by saying how thrilled I am that 2025 has yielded Blu-ray reissues of three classic music biz-related films that span “the whole genre of the rock and roll”. Fasten your seat belts…

This is Spinal Tap (The Criterion Collection) – Has it really been 41 years since one of the loudest English bands that never lived set off to “tap into America” on their imaginary comeback tour? (Checks calendar) Yes, that tracks. Director Rob Reiner co-wrote this 1984 mockumentary with Christopher Guest, Harry Shearer and Michael McKean, who play Spinal Tap founders Nigel Tufnel (lead guitar), Derek Smalls (bass) and David St. Hubbins (lead vocals and guitar), respectively (several actors portray the band’s revolving door of drummers, who tend to meet untimely ends such as spontaneous combustion, “a bizarre gardening accident”, and perhaps most famously, choking on “somebody else’s vomit”).

Reiner casts himself as “rockumentary” filmmaker Marty DiBergi (a goof on Martin Scorsese, who similarly interjected himself into The Last Waltz) who accompanies the hard rocking outfit on a tour of the states (“their first in six years”) to support the release of their new LP “Smell the Glove” (DiBergi has been a fan since first catching them at the “Electric Banana” in Greenwich Village in 1966).

By the time the film’s 84 minutes have expired, no one (and I mean, no one) involved in the business of rock ’n’ roll has been spared the knife-musicians, roadies, girlfriends, groupies, fans, band managers, rock journalists, concert promoters, record company execs, A & R reps, record store clerks…all are bagged and tagged.

Nearly every scene has become iconic in muso circles; ditto the plethora of quotable lines: “These go to eleven.” “I mean, it’s not your job to be as confused as Nigel.” “You can’t really dust for vomit.” “It’s such a fine line between stupid and clever.” “No…we’re NOT gonna fucking do ‘Stonehenge’!” “We’ve got armadillos in our trousers-it’s really quite frightening.”

The great supporting cast includes Tony Hendra (who steals all his scenes as the band’s prickly manager, clearly modeled after Led Zeppelin’s infamously fearsome handler Peter Grant), Bruno Kirby, Ed Begley, Jr., Fran Drescher, Parick Macnee, June Chadwick, Billy Crystal (“C’mon…mime is money!”), Howard Hesseman, Paul Shaffer, and Fred Williard.

Third time’s a charm for Criterion, who released previous editions on LaserDisc and DVD. The label does their usual voodoo with a sparkling new 4K transfer (supervised and approved by director Reiner) and 5.1 Surround DTS MasterAudio (“Big Bottom”, “Hell Hole”, and “Sex Farm” have never sounded so…robust).

Extras include an engaging conversation between Rob Reiner and Spinal Tap superfan Patton Oswalt, three audio commentaries, media appearances, trailers, and music videos. The 90 minutes of outtakes is a real treat for fans of the film; when you see the quality of what ended up on the cutting room floor, you marvel even more at the cast’s improvisational skills (Reiner had 100 hours of footage to pare down).

Breaking Glass (Fun City Editions) – Released on the cusp of the Thatcher era, writer-director Brian Gibson’s 1980 film is a No Wave take on A Star is Born, with a nod to the classic UK kitchen sink dramas of the 1960s. 26 year-old singer-songwriter Hazel O’Connor delivers a naturalistic performance as a disenfranchised young gas station attendant who aspires to be a rock star…but strictly on her own terms. To wit, the lyrics she furiously scribbles into her notebook are not exactly “moon-June” love sonnets; take “Big Brother”, for instance:

They’ll tear out your heart, throw it knee-deep in a cart
Cause that’s what they do with the scum like me and you
And you feel as if you died, whilst you’re standing on the line
And you wonder all the time why can’t you cry?
But the people in control don’t care for you
They are just a robot with a job to do
And when your used, exhausted, they’ll be rid of you
As soon as look at you, go to the back of the queue!

Not destined to be a chart-climber, that one. Despite the ridicule and sexism she constantly weathers, she eventually gets the attention of a street-hustling manager (Phil Daniels) who sees her potential and helps her put a decent band together (including a young Jonathan Pryce on sax). However, when she lands a recording contract, the inevitable compromises begin once a more seasoned, smooth-talking (and weaselly) industry exec (Jon Finch) begins to wrest control of her career (let the eternal battle between Art and Commerce commence).

O’Connor does her own singing (she also co-wrote the songs with soundtrack producer Tony Visconti). I see the film as a companion piece to Lou Adler’s 1981 Ladies and Gentlemen, the Fabulous Stains and Gillian Armstrong’s 1982 rock musical Starstruck (I wrote about both films here).

Fun City’s 2025 edition is a bit light on extras, but boasts a long-overdue restoration, improved audio, and (most notably) reinstates the original UK cut (the previous Olive Films reissue was not restored, and featured the U.S. cut, which is 10 minutes shorter).

Slade in Flame (BFI; Region ‘B’ only) – Akin to Mott the Hoople, it may be arguable among music geeks as to whether Slade was truly “glam” (they were a bit on the “blokey” side- as the Brits would say), but they are nonetheless considered so in some circles, and this 1974 film was released during the heyday of space boots and glitter, so there you go.

The directorial debut for Richard Loncraine (Brimstone and Treacle, The Missionary, Richard III) the film is a gritty, semi-biographical “behind the music” drama (don’t expect A Hard Day’s Night) about a working-class band called Flame (suspiciously resembling the four members of Slade, wink-wink) who get chewed up and spit out of the star-making machine (this just in: managers and A & R people are back-stabbing weasels).

It’s admittedly not a genre masterpiece, but the film is bolstered by a great soundtrack (all Slade originals, naturally) and the casting of Tom Conti (playing a soulless record exec with great aplomb). An amusing scene where lead singer Noddy Holder’s character gets locked into a stage coffin presages a similar hardware malfunction depicted in This Is Spinal Tap. Another memorable scene has the band risking life and limb to access the broadcast booth for an on-air interview at an offshore pirate radio station (the story is set in the late 60s).

BFI’s 2025 remastered Blu-ray edition is a vast improvement over Shout! Factory’s 2004 DVD, in both image and sound quality. Extras include a newly recorded audio commentary with the director and film critic Mark Kermode, a new 9-minute interview with Tom Conti, a 54-minute 2002 interview with Noddy Holder, and more. Note: Requires an all-region player.

Previous posts with related themes:

No Future: Top 5 Thatcher-era Films

Poly Styrene: I Am a Cliche

White Riot

Pirate Radio

Percentage Points and Lousy Joints: A Mixtape

More reviews at Den of Cinema

Dennis Hartley

Trump Cronies On The Plane

Look who was cavorting with Epstein long after he was first convicted in 2008:

Elon Musk, Peter Thiel and Steve Bannon are all named in copies of Jeffrey Epstein‘s daily schedules released Friday by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee.

 The schedules make reference to Musk possibly flying to an “island” in 2014, and Thiel and Bannon apparently dining with Epstein as recently as 2017 and 2019, respectively.

Musk went to the island? How interesting. Can’t say I’m surprised though. He probably saw an opportunity to spread his valuable seed to some young, fertile, females.

We knew about Bannon, of course, although nobody on the right seems to care:

As recently as 2019 — as mounting press coverage and renewed investigations were closing in before his arrest at Teterboro Airport on sex trafficking charges, as most everyone else in Jeffrey Epstein‘s orbit had already shunned the 66-year-old — Bannon was still standing by his man. The rumpled former Trump aide reportedly advised Epstein from the shadows, joined strategy calls, and ultimately helped stage a behind-the-scenes media makeover, arranging a series of videotaped sessions at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse in which Bannon served as his interlocutor. 

The setup looked like a documentary shoot — a small crew, professional lighting, with Bannon lobbing tough, prosecutorial questions from off-camera. They were a kind of debate-prep, seemingly designed to get Epstein ready for an image-changing sit-down interview with a news outlet like 60 Minutes, with Bannon playing the part of Mike Wallace. But Epstein, The Hollywood Reporter has learned, may have footed the bill for it all, throwing ownership of the footage into question.  

The interview never took place — some PR rehabs are just too daunting — but for months now, Bannon has been publicly promoting that footage of his erstwhile friend — 12 to 15 hours, by his own count — as the foundation of a planned docuseries, working title The Monster. He’s been pitching it as journalism, a raw look inside Epstein’s pathology. In fact, though, those tapings seem to have been far from journalistic.​  

According to author Michael Wolff, who was there for the first taping and reviewed transcripts of others — and who first revealed the existence of these tapes in his 2021 book Too Famous — the point wasn’t exposure. It was spin. “There’s no question the tapes were media training,” he tells THR. “And there’s no possible way Epstein would have signed off on them being used in a documentary.”

That context — his alleged financial arrangement with Epstein, the coaching role he played, the purpose of the tapings — has been conspicuously absent from Bannon’s own public commentary about the Epstein scandal over the past few months. The onetime Trump advisor has been among the most vociferous critics of Epstein and has loudly denounced the administration for its refusal to release the Epstein files.  

[…]

Bannon, who did not reply to repeated calls and emails, has in the past denied Wolff’s account and reports of his friendship with Epstein. But over the past five years he’s been considerably more hazy about the release of the Epstein tapes, waving off any inquiries about their whereabouts. Then, last February, he appeared on The Jimmy Dore Show and finally spoke about the footage, claiming he was producing a documentary series around them — “maybe for Netflix” or another streamer. “He’s a product of the elite,” Bannon said of Epstein, “and everything that’s been put out about him is not exactly the truth.”

To Wolff, who knew both Bannon and Epstein well, Bannon’s recent attacks on Epstein belies the cozy nature of their relationship. He claims the two men were good friends, meeting sometime around 2017, shortly after Bannon’s forced exit from the Trump White House, and remained close right until his death in August of 2019. During those years, Wolff claims, Bannon was a frequent visitor to both Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse and his Paris apartment, and the two exchanged calls and emails almost every day. Their affinity was not altogether surprising: The two men shared a Wall Street background, a taste for the high life and a complicated relationship with Donald Trump — both were close to the president before being iced out. (Bannon’s break with Trump came soon after the publication of Wolff’s bestselling Trump exposé Fire and Fury, for which he was widely rumored to be a major source.)

In fact, it wasn’t until years after Epstein’s alleged prison-cell suicide that Bannon publicly changed his tune on Epstein. 

Of course Bannon was an Epstein bud. He’s drawn to money and power like a horsefly to horse dung. Maybe he doesn’t have the rights to the footage but if so the Epstein estate does and they are subject to subpoena. If Bannon has it and hasn’t released it his MAGA followers should really wonder why.

Cancel Culture For The Win

Hmm. What made him go crazy like that? Well…

We all answer to Laura Loomer in America. She is the Executive VP of the country’s HR Department. They’d better do as she says, or else.

The good news is that the right has ended cancel culture which is a huge relief.

(I do love how he constantly recites the ever growing list of the alleged “hoaxes” against him. I wonder if any Republicans will ever look at that and wonder if may, just maybe, he protests too much… Nah.)

The Extreme Hypothetical Has Happened

Donald Trump is ordering the US military to murder civilians on the high seas. We know this is happening because he’s bragging about it. I just want to remind everyone of what the fatuous Chief Justice wrote in response to the dissents in the immunity case last year, in which they evoked the argument that Trump could order Seal Team Six to murder someone and would be completely immune from prosecution:

“The dissents’ positions in the end boil down to ignoring the Constitution’s separation of powers and the Court’s precedent and instead fear mongering on the basis of extreme hypotheticals about a future where the President ‘feels empowered to violate federal criminal law. The dissents overlook the more likely prospect of an Executive Branch that cannibalizes itself, with each successive President free to prosecute his predecessors, yet unable to boldly and fearlessly carry out his duties for fear that he may be next.”

It’s not an extreme hypothetical. It’s reality. And what the majority failed to understand because they were so exercised that Trump The Precious was a criminal who was being held to account for staging a coup, fraud and stealing classified documents was that they had opened the door to a president not only ordering malicious prosecutions against everyone but the previous president, but that he was actually exactly the kind of criminal who would order murders knowing that he was immune from prosecution as long as he was claiming, without evidence, that he was doing it for “national security.”

While he didn’t order Seal Team Six to murder someone, he did order U.S. Navy ships to do it, which I’m sure they did with the understanding that Trump would pardon everyone and would never himself have to face prosecution. It’s happening. And apparently, nobody cares.

Here’s the latest on the Venezuela murder operation:

U.S. military officials are drawing up options to target drug traffickers inside Venezuela, and strikes within that country’s borders could potentially begin in a matter of weeks, four sources told NBC News.

Striking inside Venezuela would be another escalation in the Trump administration’s military campaign against alleged drug targets and its stance toward Venezuela’s government.

[…]

Some Trump administration officials are disappointed that the United States’ military escalation does not appear to have weakened Maduro’s grip on power or prompted any significant response, the official familiar with the discussions said…

The official who is disappointed is Marco Rubio. This operation is his baby. He is dying to depose Maduro who has become his white whale. The fact that the world has not rallied to trump’s side and that Maduro hasn’t reacted to the provocation has made them hesitate to invade. But it looks like they’re prepared to escalate. And invasion is almost inevitable once they start blowing up civilians on the ground.

Trump is “prepared to use every element of American power to stop drugs from flooding into our country and to bring those responsible to justice,” the senior administration official said.

There has been no discussion of whether Venezuela is actually flooding the U.S. with drugs, much less whether it’s legal for the administration to just start killing people. It’s just happening, as the dissenting Justices all predicted it would.

A Different Bowl Of Thin Gruel

For those of you who might be interested in getting into the weeds on the Comey indictment, this X- thread by MSNBC’s Mike Levine says that the case is not what everyone says it is. Not that it’s any stronger, mind you. It’s just a different set of facts than what everyone assumed:

The Justice Department is still offering few details about their case against former FBI director James Comey, but @ABC News has learned that Count 1 of the indictment, charging Comey with making false statements, focuses on his alleged role in having his close friend and former personal lawyer, Daniel Richman, provide information to reporters about an FBI investigation connected to Hillary Clinton

In the indictment, Count 1 says that Comey “willfully and knowingly” lied when, testifying under oath to the Senate Judiciary Committee in September 2020, he reaffirmed previous Senate testimony insisting he never “authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports” about an investigation connected to someone only identified as “PERSON 1.”

“That statement was false, because, as JAMES B. COMEY JR. then and there knew, he in fact had authorized PERSON 3 to serve as an anonymous source in news reports regarding [the] FBI investigation,” the indictment reads.

Sources tell ABC News that “PERSON 1” is Clinton and “PERSON 3” is Richman.

(w/ @KFaulders @alex_mallin) 

Though Richman was a close personal friend of Comey’s, he also served as an unpaid “Special Government Employee” during Comey’s last two years at the FBI, according to publicly-available FBI and Justice Department documents. Richman’s work with the FBI largely focused on promoting lawful access to encrypted phones, and — as Comey himself later told federal investigators — Richman was “on-site at the FBI a lot” during that time. 

While we still don’t know the exact matter involving Richman that is the focus of Count 1, the House Judiciary Committee has released a trove of FBI documents from a series of leak investigations launched in 2017 that shed more light on Richman’s role as Comey’s alleged “liaison to the media.”

According to the documents, one of the leak investigations centered around a New York Times article on April 22, 2017, headlined “Comey Tried to Shield the FBI from Politics. Then He Shaped an Election.” The article reported that one of the reasons Comey decided to publicly announce his recommendation against charging Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server involved a “Russian document” that could have been used to question Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s impartiality. Some of the information in the article was allegedly classified, and as part of the subsequent leak investigation, the FBI interviewed Richman, the documents show. 

The newly-released FBI documents say that while “Comey instructed the FBI to hire Richman as a Special Government Employee” — with “a Top Secret clearance” — to work on “Going Dark” matters, “Comey also used Richman as a liaison to the media.”

“Richman contacted journalists to correct stories critical of Comey, the FBI and to shape future press coverage,” the FBI said in a September 2021 report on its investigation. “Richman did this both when he was an SGE and after he resigned from the FBI.”

Richman, however, told the FBI during its investigation that Comey never asked him to talk to the media, according to the documents.

The newly-released documents, which are heavily redacted at some points, suggest that in at least one instance, Richman spoke with a reporter about sensitive information.

The documents say that in a meeting in his office January 2017, Comey privately told Richman that one of the many reasons he decided to make a public statement about the Clinton email investigation was the classified information that could potentially undermine Lynch’s credibility. As Richman himself recalled to the FBI, shortly after his meeting with Comey, Richman spoke to one of the New York Times reporters who later published the April 22, 2017, article and discussed the classified information with the reporter, though “Richman claimed [the reporter] brought up the Classified Information and knew more about it than he did,” the newly-released documents recount.

Nevertheless, after more than four years of investigation, the FBI stated in its report at the time, “The investigation has not yielded sufficient evidence to criminally charge any person, including Comey or Richman, with making false statements or with the substantive offenses under investigation.” 

Stephen Miller says that Comey staged an attempted coup and that’s why he’s being prosecuted. If that prosecution is based on these facts, it would seem he’s being prosecuted for a coup against Hillary Clinton.

Dialing It Up To Eleven

Just a smattering of today’s headlines:

It’s fine. Everything’s fine.

Vast Left-wing You-Know-What

We are now an authoritarian state

There is no denying it anymore, even if the mainstream press will. Whatever red lines remained for Donald Trump to cross he crossed this week with the indictment of former FBI director James Comey. Ty Cobb, Former White House Special Counsel under Trump 1.0, told PBS that the Comey indictment is “wholly un-American and really despicable in the way it was done.”

We are now an authoritarian state. Led by a madman. Backed by a cult primed to punish his enemies.

GOP Official Calls for Democratic Congresswoman to Be Executed

Daily Caller Opinion Column ‘Explicitly’ Calls for Violence

If the Department of Justice can indict a James Comey on Donald Trump’s say-so, the government can sic his prosecutors on anyone. You. Me. Anyone. A commentator last night insisted that attorneys will need to band together to provide pro bono defenses for far more ordinary people who will inevitably face charges, perhaps by the thousands.

Like this gentleman: Justice Department Seeks Information on Georgia D.A. Who Prosecuted Trump

Trump declared in a “national security” memorandum issued this week that his administration now considers dissent terrorism. It is a masterpiece of up-is-downism. Perhaps you didn’t know, but there is a vast, left-wing conspiracy afoot in the land.

This order got lost in the flood of insane actions from Trump this week. So much so that there is little commentary on it this morning. There is too much in here to unpack, but here is a thread that makes a stab at it.

* * * * *

Have you fought dicktatorship today?

50501 
May Day Strong
No King’s One Million Rising movement – Next national day of protest Oct. 18
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense