Skip to content

Month: October 2025

Setting Up The Midterms

President Donald Trump has a lot on his plate these days. There’s his military actions in Latin America, which have left at least 43 dead, and the government shutdown, now in its 28th day. There’s his demolition of the East Wing of the White House, the militarization of Democratic-led cities and tariffs, tariffs and more tariffs. Those are just a few of the highlights. Somehow, though, he has still managed to ensure that the Department of Justice isn’t leaving any stone unturned in its pursuit of his perceived political enemies. 

Even as he traveled to Asia over the weekend, Trump found time to post that former FBI Director Christopher Wray, Special Prosecutor Jack Smith, Attorney General Merrick Garland and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco “cheated and rigged the 2020 election.” That’s odd, you’re likely thinking; Trump was the president in 2020, and with the exception of Wray — whom he handpicked to lead the FBI in 2017 after Director James Comey’s firing — all of them were appointed after he left office. But that would be missing the point. 

Trump is determined to see that the 2020 election remains at the top of voters’ minds, despite the fact that he won in 2024 and Democrats accepted the results without any question. 

To my mind, the president’s continuing obsession with 2020 is mostly because he will never be able to accept that he lost — and he certainly cannot accept that he made an utter fool of himself with what transpired on Jan. 6. In fact, the lengths to which he went in contesting the election are even more deeply humiliating than the Big Lie itself. On some level Trump knows this, and he can only soothe what churns inside him by doubling down on all of it, even if it means claiming that people who weren’t even in office were responsible. 

But there’s yet another reason for his compulsive dredging up of 2020, and it has everything to do with the future, not the past. With the 2026 midterms looming, Trump knows he can’t lose either chamber of Congress. Once that happens, his reign as the unfettered master of all he surveys will be over. A Democratic majority may not be able to stop his executive actions, especially as the Supreme Court seems to be intent upon handing him more and more power. But they would not lack means to claw back some authority of their own and at least slow him down.

Trump also knows that if the Republicans lose, his status as a lame duck is suddenly very real. No longer will he be the king, much less the kingmaker — and he cannot stand the idea of being irrelevant. (And no, despite the recent Steve Bannon blather about a secret plan to allow Trump a third term, it’s very unlikely. He will be 82 on Election Day in 2028, and he’s already slipping very badly.) Instead, the president wants to leave office as the undisputed Greatest Leader the World Has Ever Known, and losing the midterms as he did in 2018 just won’t do. 

The plans for how to make sure his supremacy is maintained are not a secret. The first step is to ensure there is enough suspicion around election systems that the results are inherently suspect — unless the Republicans win. You would think that GOP voters would wonder why, if the Democrats are so adept at stealing elections, that they stole the one in 2020 but forgot to do the same in 2024. Instead, they take the president’s claims at face value — that he actually won a huge landslide last year that was just too big for Democrats to poach. In fact, Trump’s win over Vice President Kamala Harris was one of the narrowest victories in history. But to MAGA supporters, that just proves Democrats would have succeeded with their nefarious plans if Trump hadn’t won so “bigly.”

Even though he was on a trip to Asia to meet with important leaders including Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump felt the need to post on social media that the 2020 election is a bigger scandal than the NBA gambling probe. He expressed hopes that “the DOJ pursues this with as much ‘gusto’ as befitting the biggest SCANDAL in American history!” Then he issued a telling warning: “If not, it will happen again, including the upcoming Midterms.” 

Trump went on to demand that mail-in and early voting be banned, and he claimed that California’s redistricting is “totally dishonest” because ballots are being “shipped.” 

That’s just the tip of the iceberg. Already, there are more concrete plans on the horizon. Mother Jones’ election expert Ari Berman laid out steps for what he dubbed “Project 2026” — the GOP’s plan to ensure they do not lose the midterms. 

One important step happened in March, when Trump signed an executive order that contained a laundry list of voter suppression policies, including requiring proof of citizenship to vote and mail-in ballots to be received by election day. The order has been blocked in the courts, but Berman speculates that it is really designed as a means to contest the outcome if Republicans don’t win. Quite a few states have adopted these new requirements already. The order also has a cute catch-22 built in by requiring only certain voting machines and new standards be used — except they aren’t available, which automatically opens the door to challenges on the basis of compromised machine

By now, everyone knows about the GOP’s redistricting and gerrymandering efforts. Trump and party officials are openly demanding that GOP-led states redistrict to give the party more seats in the House. Meanwhile, on Oct. 15 the Supreme Court heard Louisiana v. Callais, which could weaken or kill the Voting Rights Act, eliminate most of the Black Democratic held seats in the South and possibly ensure a Republican majority in the House of Representatives for the foreseeable future. 

Election deniers have also secured key government appointments, allowing them to work from within. This includes Heather Honey, who was named deputy assistant secretary for election integrity at the Department of Homeland Security in August, and Harmeet Dhillon, who was appointed to head the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. Dhillon is now focused on Black and Brown districts she claims are “unconstitutional racial gerrymanders.” 

Following the lead of a candidate for the North Carolina Supreme Court who challenged the election results and nearly succeeded in having tens of thousands of votes thrown out, GOP officials throughout the country are preparing for similar challenges which may very well succeed if they can locate the right judge. 

Berman notes there are concerns about Trump finding a reason to declare yet another national emergency, which would allow him to deploy the National Guard or send in Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to intimidate people at the polls. That’s certainly a possibility. And there’s an excellent chance that if a Democratic House majority depends upon seating the winners of some close races, key GOP election officials could simply refuse to certify them and Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., could then refuse to swear them in. (He’s already doing just that with Democratic Rep.-Elect Adelita Grijalva of Arizona.) 

There was a time when I would have thought that such talk was paranoia, that Trump was just blowing smoke as a sort of prophylaxis against a possible loss. But the GOP has fully bought into the idea that they have a right to win by any means necessary, and that a Democratic victory is inherently illegitimate — regardless of the voters’ intentions. Unfortunately the 2026 midterms will not be the last election held under the shadow of election denialism. It is now an organizing principle of the Republican Party.

Salon

A Constitutional Guarantee That Isn’t

Article 4 Section 4

Roy Cohn’s most famous apprentice never admits defeat. Donald Trump never let go of losing the presidency to Joe Biden in 2020. He loves getting even, even for imaginary slights. Even if it takes time. Trump got even for his 2011 White House Correspondents’ Dinner roasting five years later by winning the White House in 2016. He tried (and failed) to get even for losing in 2020 by inciting a mob assault on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, with claims that he’d been robbed. He means to get even today by throwing the 2026 elections into chaos.

If Republicans lose control of the U.S. House, Trump will claim victory anyway. He will shout that the elections were flawed, rigged against him. One need not be clairvoyant to see it. He’s broadcasting his plans.

David Graham games out how it might go this morning in The Atlantic. Trump goes from claims of vote tampering to ordering troops to seize voting machines. He invokes the Insurrection Act, etc., in Graham’s war-gaming (gift link):

Trump and his allies will have before them less an orderly set of instructions than a buffet of options. Some of these options will go untested, or amount to nothing. But elections are a game of margins. Only a handful of Senate seats and a few dozen House races may be seriously contested, thanks to maps drawn to guarantee safe seats for one party or the other. Of those, some may be very close. In 2024, 18 House races were decided by fewer than 10,000 votes. Democrats won 11 of those.

Election experts Graham consulted “used words like nightmare  and warned that Americans need to be ready for ‘really wild stuff.’ ”

“If you are not frightened,” Hannah Fried, the executive director of the voter-access group All Voting Is Local, told me, “you are not paying attention.”

Still, elections are decentralized and locally controlled. But Trump is not only laying the groundwork for establishing competitive authoritarianism, he and Republican Party accomplices across the country are working a smorgasbord of angles ahead of 2026 for ensuring GOP control in D.C. and in the states no matter what voters’ preferences.

In this “game of margins,” Republicans are changing registration rules and vote-counting deadlines. They mean to limit voting methods and voting days. And by redrawing congressional districts mid-decade at Trump’s request, they mean to give Republicans even more seats in Congress disproportionate to their public support. Trump may have no presidential power over elections, but the authoritarian holds the threat of his retribution over Republican state officials he would consider disloyal for not snapping to attention and saying, “Yes, sir, how high?” Trump is repeatedly musing about running for a prohibited third term in 2028. He’s plowing the earth for his MAGA cult and planting seeds to make such an attempt seem legal.

Red states are already preparing for the U.S. Supreme Court to drive the last nail into the coffin of the Voting Rights Act. Section 2 permits creation of majority-minority districts to protect the voting power of minorities. Voiding Section 2 would “open up the floodgates” for drawing racially skewed districts, “if not in time for 2026 than certainly for 2028,” Politico reports:

“Many states across the South are already licking their chops to try and prepare to racially gerrymander maps as quickly as possible,” said John Bisognano, president of the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. “It is clear that there is a consistent and dramatic need for laws to be in place to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment and ensure that the racial gerrymandering or racial discrimination at large is not permitted in this country.”

Read the details at the link.

North Carolina Republicans filed their controversial Voter Information Verification Act (VIVA) days after SCOTUS heard arguments in Shelby County v. Holder in February 2013. They passed it just over a month after SCOTUS ruled to weaken Section 5 of the VRA. Don’t think other GOP-dominated states don’t already have legislation sitting in drawers to take advantage of a SCOTUS ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that guts VRA Section 2.

The GOP’s nationwide assault on voting rights and fair representation over the last 15 years means that Americans in many states now are effectively, if not actually, denied the “Republican Form of Government” (small-r) guaranteed to each state in Article IV Section 4.

The Supreme Court has demurred since 1849 on the issue of whether the federal courts can hear cases brought under the Guarantee Clause. They’ve treated the clause as nonjusticiable, just as the Roberts court did the issue of partisan gerrymandering in 2019 (Rucho v. Common Cause). For now, that leaves the GOP-controlled federal Executive and Legislative branches in charge of enforcing that Section 4 guarantee. Meaning the Guarantee Clause is no guarantee at all.

Attention is political currency. Maybe it’s time for Democrats to make that dead issue a live one ahead of 2026. Maybe it’s time for some enterprising Democrat Attorney General with top-notch social media skills to sue the U.S. government over the Guarantee Clause. So what if the clause is obscure? Make a very public stink, win or lose, over the East-Wing-like demolition of our government’s mechanisms for heeding the voice of We the People. (Looking at you, NC AG Jeff Jackson. Maybe you and some buddy AGs. )

We exist now in an attention economy. There is no reason to not make a public show of demanding the United States uphold its constitutional obligations. I have no idea how that would work or how a credible case might be brought, but it’s the kind of attention-getting stunt Jackson is very good at and revels in. Democrats want to see Democrats fight Trump’s demolition of the Constitution.

As consultant friend in D.C. observed, he’s in “fight on the beaches, fight in the cities, fight on every hill and foothill mode.” Me too. 

* * * * *

Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?

No King’s One Million Rising movement 
50501 
May Day Strong
Freedom Over Fascism Toolkit
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Water Kills Magnets

Trump had an uncle who taught at MIT, have you heard?

Donald Trump, boy stable genius, is just a ramblin’ guy, The Daily Beast reports:

Donald Trump went on a deranged rant about the power of water to destroy magnets during a rambling address to the U.S. Navy just off the coast of Japan. Speaking aboard the USS George Washington aircraft carrier during his tour of East Asia, the president appeared to suggest—in a largely incoherent speech—that he is pushing for aircraft carriers to use “steam for the catapults” and hydraulics for elevators, while wrongly claiming that water can disable magnets.

Trump had an uncle who taught at MIT, have you heard? How many times?

The elderly president was talking about the magnetic catapults used to launch planes from the latest Navy super carriers, the USS Gerald R. Ford class, and the electromagnetic elevators used to move weaponry to the flight deck. Both systems double the speed with which planes can be armed and launched but slowed the delivery and commissioning of the $13 billion flagship of the class.

But magnets give “perfect” results when they are scanning Trump’s brain. Why are doctors giving Trump an MRI and his second dementia screening in six months?

* * * * *

Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?

No King’s One Million Rising movement 
50501 
May Day Strong
Freedom Over Fascism Toolkit
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

A Little Bit Of Happiness In These Trying Times

Paul Waldman checks in on Elon and it’s excellent:

  • Musk is engaged in an ongoing feud with acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy over delays in SpaceX’s work for future NASA missions, which naturally Musk has made as personal and angry as possible.
  • Tesla’s profits dropped 37% in the third quarter of the year despite a bump in vehicle sales as consumers rushed to beat the expiration of EV tax credits.
  • In response to the end of the credits, Tesla unveiled slightly cheaper and slightly crappier versions of its Model Y and Model 3. Other than the spectacular failure of the Cybertruck, it hasn’t released a new model in years, which doesn’t exactly position it as a company on the bleeding edge of innovation.
  • Tesla’s robotaxi rollout in Austin has been underwhelming; only about 30 of the taxis are in operation, and they still have drivers in the front seat for safety. Musk says that by year’s end they will be fully autonomous, but his predictions have a way of not coming true. In any case, Tesla is way behind Waymo in this sector, suggesting that the robotaxi project will never amount to anything like what Musk has said it would.
  • Tesla recently rolled out “Mad Max” mode in its self-driving features, which will engage in rapid acceleration and swerving between lanes. Sounds like a great idea that couldn’t possibly have any negative consequences! Naturally, safety regulators are concerned.
  • Musk is trying to get Tesla shareholders to approve what would be a $1 trillion pay package, though it is highly unlikely that it will ever amount to that much, since it depends on outlandish production and sales targets.

And he’s still the biggest freak on the planet:

Elon Musk thinks that Grimes, the mother of two of his children, is a “simulation” he has created in his mind, according to journalist Devin Gordon.

The writer, who interviewed Grimes at her house earlier this year, appears in the BBC’s new documentary, The Elon Musk Show. While being interviewed for the series, he said that the Tesla billionaire believed that the musician was his “perfect companion” but not “real”.

Waldman writes:

Perhaps Musk will mount a dramatic comeback and surprise us all. Perhaps his AI company, xAI, will emerge as the dominant force in that sector (assuming there’s a universal demand for a chatbot that is being shaped according to Musk’s anti-woke ideology and at one point started calling itself MechaHitler). And he is still the richest man in the world (current estimated net worth: $428 billion), though it is mostly based on the insane price of Tesla shares. Nevertheless, it isn’t hard to imagine that Musk has begun what could be a dramatic fall.

Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

The Golden Shield

If you think the fact that the murderous attacks by the U.S. Navy on civilians in small boats are clearly illegal don’t get your hopes up that anything can be done about it. Former Office of Legal Counsel Jack Goldsmith tells us that there’s something called the “Golden Shield” which can apparently legalize any behavior by a government official.

The attorney general—and, by delegation, OLC—wields a power akin to an advance pardon: the ability to insulate executive officials from future criminal liability through legal advice. When the DOJ advises the president or another officer that a proposed action complies with federal criminal law, that opinion effectively guarantees immunity from prosecution by a later administration.

Former Central Intelligence Agency general counsel John Rizzo called such advice a “golden shield.” He had in mind the legally flawed OLC opinions that concluded that the CIA’s post-9/11 enhanced interrogation techniques (EIT) did not violate the criminal ban on torture. Rizzo viewed the OLC opinions as “the Executive Branch’s functional equivalent of a Supreme Court opinion [that] would protect the Agency and its people forevermore.”

[S]everal legal and practical considerations support OLC’s “immunity-conferring power.”

First, the attorney general and, by delegation, OLC exercise the president’s Article II power to determine governing law for the executive branch.

Second, under the doctrine of entrapment by estoppel, it violates due process to prosecute someone who reasonably relies on an authorized government opinion that the vetted conduct is lawful, even if the opinion turns out to be flawed. The government cannot advise someone that an act is legal and later punish them for doing it. At oral argument in Trump v. United States, the special counsel’s attorney, Michael Dreeben, invoked this principle in trying to persuade the justices that a presidential immunity defense from criminal prosecution was unnecessary. He stated that “it would be a due process problem to prosecute a President who received advice from the Attorney General that his actions were lawful.”

And here I thought the “I was only following orders” excuse had been tossed in the dustbin for all time after WWII. Apparently not.

There are some other legalese rationales as to why this essentially confer immunity on anyone who follows orders. I confess I had no idea the extent to which this idea was an accepted doctrine.

In case you were wondering, Trump’s OLC has reportedly issued a Golden Shield, in secret, for the murders in the high seas:

Legal deliberations inside the executive branch, according to officials familiar with the matter, have been closely held and largely limited to political appointees. The Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel — which Mr. Trump sidelined for most of the year until appointing an official to lead it in August as preparations for the attacks ramped up — has produced a memo apparently blessing the campaign. But the administration has not described its analysis.

That article by Charlie Savage of the NY Times, describes a process that is radically different than that undertaken by all the other administration who contemplated broadening the powers of the president in foreign affairs. The Trump administration just has a few insiders and this new toady at the office of Legal Counsel rubber stamping whatever Trump and his bloodthirsty henchmen want to do.

Between this and the plenary pardon power it looks like there’s no legal restraint on anything the president wants to do. As Goldsmith writes:

OLC’s golden-shield-conferring authority amplifies the administration’s already prodigious efforts to clear away legal constraints on Trump’s will and bring him closer to realizing his famous claim: “I have an Article II, where I have the right to do whatever I want as president.”

If we manage to survive this, I think we have to accept that legal accountability for this lawless, immoral regime is going to be very hard to come by. And even reforms will be awfully difficult to sustain now that Trump has laid the path for any would-be despot to simply ignore the rule of law and decimate existing norms. It’s going to take a tremendous effort to turn this around. I hope smart people are thinking about how to create something new out of the rubble because there’s no going back.

“… And Then They Came For Me”

I would imagine that quite of few of us older duffers can see ourselves in that guy. He drove his car into one of these ICE blockades and they went nuts, dragged him out of his car, threw him to the ground, kneeled heavily on his back and neck and broke 7 ribs.

This is happening to latinos of all ages, every day, all over the country. These cos-playing thugs drive around in unmarked cars wearing masks which makes them unidentifiable and unaccountable. And, as this shows, they’re brutalizing anyone who gets in their way, no matter who they are. They are clearly completely out of control.

And let’s not forget that it’s over nothing. This made-up crisis about undocumented immigration, of people who’ve been here for decades working and paying taxes, kids, old people, valuable workers, all so Trump and his henchmen can militarize the streets and brutalize America into submitting to their fascist mission. There is no other reason.

With all this video everywhere, how can it be that this is just going on with people like us saying “this is outrageous, it’s illegal” and it just keeps escalating? I don’t think anyone voted for that but it seems at the moment that there’s nothing to be done. Where does it end?

Why?

The doctors did not report that they’d given him an MRI which is not routine even for someone his age.

What were they ruling out? Or in?

And this one …. again:

Love to show how smart I am by bragging about my score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

Max Kennerly (@maxkennerly.bsky.social) 2025-10-27T14:32:11.622Z

I don’t know what it says about his encroaching dementia but the fact that he brags about that test is conclusive proof that he’s dumb as a post.

Here’s a little sanewashing from the NY Times:

Mr. Trump also reiterated that he was interested in serving a third term, saying that he “would love to do it” because of his popularity with his supporters.

What did he actually say?

Trump on a third term: "I would love to do it. I have the best numbers ever. Am I not ruling it out? You'll have to tell me."

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-10-27T12:18:37.028Z

That’s right. He did NOT specify that he was popular “with his supporters.” He just said, “I have the best numbers ever…” We don’t know if he’s just lying or deluded or both. But his numbers are actually the worst they’ve ever been.

I really don’t think he’s planning to do this. He’s being the reality show star, of course. It’s his schtick. But it’s also to keep himself from becoming a lame duck for as long as possible. He’ll tease a third term for as long as he possibly can note that in his comments above he is actively pushing Rubio and Vance, even suggesting they run together. He wants to anoint his successor.

Where’s The Hope?

Garret Graff writes one of the darkest newsletters about our current situation and he’s pretty much always on target. But he offered some more optimistic thoughts in this one and I think they’re well worth sharing:

I’ve written over the last three months about how the United States has tipped into authoritarianism — we’ve crossed an invisible line never crossed before in our history — but that slide is not necessarily permanent nor irreversible, and I hope that this weekend’s “No Kings” protests will someday be looked back upon as a turning point when the public anger’s and resistance to fascism began to boil.

Last month, at the Author’s Guild literary festival in the Berkshires, an audience member asked me a question I at first stumbled to answer: What are my reasons for hope in this time? I will admit that they are few and far between right now. However, there are three significant reservoirs of hope for me:

The first is that there are more of us than them, and that’s true and it’s important. He notes:

Donald Trump, Stephen Miller, and the other corrupt cronies and would-be fascists of this administration are in many ways racing the clock. As Paul Krugman wrote last month, “Trump is nakedly following the playbook of autocrats like Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orban. As his poll numbers fall, he is rushing to lock in permanent power by punishing his opponents and intimidating everyone else into submission… Yet Trump has a significant problem that neither Putin nor Orban faced. When Putin and Orban were consolidating their autocracies, they were genuinely popular. They were perceived by the public as effective and competent leaders. Just nine months into his presidency, Trump, by contrast, is deeply unpopular. He is increasingly seen as chaotic and inept.”

According to all of the experts on modern authoritarianism, this is key. On the other hand Trump’s doing some old school stuff like putting brownshirts in the streets and calling in the military. The minute any violent resistance happens, as is very possible, I think we’re going to see a reversion to the old style of violent state repression. Still, they are inept and Trump is not a focused ideologue. He’s just dancing as fast as he can swinging wildly from wanting to be the biggest asshole on the planet to the prince of peace. I just don’t know if he’s got what it takes to pull off Stephen Miller’s fascist agenda.

The second thing that gives Graff hope is America’s history which has had some extremely dark periods and yet the country survived and went on to improve and show progress. It’s all true. But as Keynes famously quipped, sure it will work out in the long run “but in the long run we’ll all be dead.”

The third thought is the one I’m most interested in and I think it’s what gives me the most hope:

Trump won’t last forever, which means “Trumpism” will fall.

Trump may want to be a dictator and emulate Franco and Orban, and — who knows — maybe the ridiculous White House ballroom he’s building is an indication he doesn’t plan to leave peacefully on January 20, 2029, but time tells us that he’s never going to be Franco, the dictator who reigned in Spain from 1939 until 1975. The reality is Donald Trump is 79 and not well — and probably less well than the media is willing to dig into — and his reign as president and America’s would-be king will be measured in years, not decades.

Whenever and however Donald Trump exits the stage, there just isn’t anyone who will step into the MAGA movement’s shoes — there are plenty of people who will try, from JD Vance to Marco Rubio to Ron DeSantis to Don Jr. to Ted Cruz, but the thing we’ve seen over and over across the last decade is that no one is Donald Trump. Vice President JD Vance, an incredibly awkward and unfunny Trump-lite who is widely despised by both sides, is most certainly not Donald Trump.

Trump has built in MAGA not a movement but a personality cult — a fragile coalition of anti-government extremists, white nationalists, conspiracists, disaffected people hurt by globalization, and a lot of low-information voters whose brains have been fried by right-wing media and social media algorithms.

If civil society and good people, like the millions who will march this weekend at the No Kings protests, can stay strong, vocal, and active in the months and years ahead, there’s plenty of reason to believe that the United States — or at least parts of the United States — can begin to repair the damage done by Trumpism and continue to advance our national, collective 250-year-old dream of a multiracial democracy more just, more equal, and more free.

The damage that Trump has already done to our government, our institutions, and our civic national fabric will be real and lasting. We will never be the country we were before Donald Trump corruptly won the election in 2016 with Russia’s help, but someday — across years and decades, and maybe not even during my lifetime but perhaps during my childrens’ lifetime — we can strive to work together to ensure that the country we hand off to future generations is better than the one we’ve inherited.

In this I’m actually heartened by the fact that most Republican politicians are cowards rather than ideologues dedicated to the fascist project. And those in the latter camp are incredibly stupid. (Kash Patel? Ed Martin?)

The cult of personality has the GOP in its grip and it’s creating habits of mind that will be very difficult to dislodge. The younger generation of MAGAs have no frame of reference before Trump who is a weird, demented, rapidly aging old man. He hasn’t had the time or the discipline to create a real movement. It’s mostly showbiz with dire consequences and massive damage done but he’s not Adolph Hitler, Stalin or Mao. And none of his would-be successors will be able to take the baton and run with it. Without Trump MAGA will die.

The country is irreversibly changed in many ways, as Graff suggests. But nothing says that whatever comes next has to be fascism and corruption. The demise of Trump will be an opportunity for others to step in and create something newer and better than what came before. If only to combat the existential threat of climate change we must hope that we can do it. That’s where my hope lies today.

The “Vibes” Are Coming For Republicans

They can’t escape the cost of living

Reuters/Ipsos poll

This time last year, America was focused on the upcoming presidential election. Despite a major hiccup during the summer, in which President Joe Biden bowed out after weeks of fevered speculation following a catastrophic debate performance and left Vice President Kamala Harris to carry the banner into November, Democrats were feeling very positive about their prospects. After all, the former guy, as Biden often referred to him, had lost the previous election, tried to stage a coup and had been convicted of 34 felonies. He couldn’t possibly make a comeback.

But no matter how they tried to explain it to voters or to shift the focus to other issues, Democrats were faced with a problem. In the end, they couldn’t escape it. 

In mid-2021, for the first time in 40 years, inflation took hold of the American economy. The Covid-19 pandemic had caused upheaval around the world. Delayed consumer demand accelerated dramatically at a time when supply chains were chaotic and necessary government stimulus increased the money supply. The Russian invasion of Ukraine put even more stress on the situation by driving up food prices and energy costs. By June 2022, inflation reached 9%.

In October 2024, just a month before the presidential election, inflation had decreased dramatically to 2.4%, just slightly above the Federal Reserve’s target of 2%. But people weren’t feeling the recovery — and in politics, perception is everything.

Prices hadn’t reverted to what they were before the pandemic. And when the price of eggs spiked due to an outbreak of avian flu, it became the symbol of general anger and unhappiness at the overall economy. The vibes, as they became known, were bad. 

Many Democratic party officials, pundits and analysts believe inflation is what got Donald Trump reelected. There were enough people who were spooked by perceptions about the economy, and many remembered the first Trump administration as a kind of golden economic age — mostly because he kept telling them they were. They believed he would bring prices down. At campaign events and in interviews, Trump would be asked what he planned to do about the cost of living, and he would meander around, saying that tariffs would bring in huge amounts of money, implying the government would cover additional costs. 

During one appearance, he was asked about the soaring cost of child care. He clearly had no idea how to respond, so he first referenced his daughter Ivanka’s work on the issue during his first term. Then Trump declared that, “relatively speaking, [childcare is] not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in.” At an event at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, he posed with tables full of groceries and vowed, “When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on Day One.”

That never happened, and now many of the people who were counting on their grocery bills going back to what they were seven or eight years ago are gravely disappointed. Still, that hasn’t stopped Trump from telling them that their vibes are wrong and that inflation is gone. During a Thursday roundtable at the White House, he dismissed such anxieties. “Inflation, I’ve already taken care of,” he said. “Economically, the country is the strongest it’s ever been — thank God for tariffs. If we didn’t have tariffs we’d be a third-world nation.”

That’s a typically absurd comment and barely anyone believes it — not even many of his own supporters. Polling shows that inflation is the president’s lowest issue rating, averaging in the mid-30s and dropping. While the price of eggs has fallen back to normal levels now that the bird flu crisis has abated, people are seeing the price of beef skyrocket by 51% since February 2020. Americans famously love beef, so this placed Trump in dangerous territory — even before he announced his plan to quadruple imports of Argentinian beef, which have left ranchers “furious,” according to the New York Times.

The president’s tariffs haven’t helped. Inflation has been edging up ever since he announced his trade war in April, despite the warnings of most economists, who cautioned that tariffs will raise prices for consumers. The full effects of Trump’s tariffs haven’t yet been felt. Bigger companies were able to front load their inventories in anticipation, and small businesses have been taking out loans and freezing hiring to keep from raising prices. While farmers are being squeezed by losing their international markets due to retaliatory tariffs, they are facing higher prices for their own inputs at the same time. 

Aside from the AI boom that’s fueling the stock market bubble, the economy is basically frozen, according to economist Paul Krugman. Everyone is holding their breath, waiting to see if the mercurial Trump will continue these tariffs, or if he will pull back once he’s flattered just the right way or given something he wants in return. (On Saturday, Trump announced an additional 10% tariff on Canadian goods after a television ad funded by Ontario used the voice of President Ronald Reagan to denounce tariffs and aired during the World Series. He had already suspended trade talks with Canada on Thursday because of the ad.) But with the tariffs in effect, businesses are paying more for the imports they need to produce their goods and supply their customers. 

The government shutdown has delayed the release of all economic data except the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for September, which the administration called back federal workers to produce because it’s required to determine Social Security payments. On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the CPI showed a 3% rise when compared to September 2024 — the fastest annual pace since the start of the year. When combined with what is assumed to still be a deteriorating job market — those numbers are still unavailable due to the shutdown — it shows that Trump’s claim that the economy is the strongest it’s ever been to be laughable. 

Inflation is now a ticking time bomb for Republicans. They should have learned from the Biden administration’s stumbles that you can’t persuade people that they should be happy about the cost of living just because the statistics are good. And in this case, the statistics are not good. In fact, they’re getting worse.

Not even Trump, with his talent for pounding falsehoods so relentlessly that it convinces a lot of people to believe him instead of their own eyes, can beat the vibes when people are paying more and earning less. It’s another perfect storm, and this time it’s one entirely of his own making.

Salon

Not High Risk But High Numbers

Neighbors will do what they see you do

Rebecca Solnit flagged a September podcast she missed, as I did:

Acts of non-coöperation are very powerful,” Merriman, the former president of the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict, says. “Non-coöperation is very much about numbers. You don’t necessarily need people doing things that are high risk. You just need large numbers of people doing them.”

I missed this The Political Scene podcast (link at bottom of post) when it came out in late September, but DDaniel Huntersteered me to it and I’m listening for the second time because it’s such extraordinarily good (and encouraging) insight into how resistance can and does work in general and in our current crisis in the US: “The Washington Roundtable discusses how, in the wake of the reinstatement of Jimmy Kimmel’s show, public resistance has a chance to turn the tide against autocratic impulses in today’s politics. They are joined by Hardy Merriman, an expert on the history and practice of civil resistance, to discuss what kinds of coördinated actions—protests, boycotts, “buycotts,” strikes, and other nonviolent approaches—are most effective in a fight against democratic backsliding”

Conventional wisdom has it that Trumpism is going to win and prevail for a long time and there’s not much we can do, but it’s conventional because it’s informed by status quo/centrist notions that power is something that resides in those people we call ‘the powerful,’ the elite few, that the rest of us have none, and that most people are narrowly self-interested and won’t stand up on principle (leaving aside that we don’t need ‘most people,’ just a lot of people). Which is just wrong and ignorant and extremely disempowering and a story some of all of us get fed all the time and some of us swallow. Especially as people are standing up in a thousand ways. Do not forget that the Trumpists are weak and scared and rushing to destroy as much as possible before we stop them.

As an aside, one of my frustrations about moderate Democrats, some socialist-y people, and too many pundits is their insistence that ‘people’ other than themselves, the people they’re patronizing, only vote for narrow self interest, aka ‘kitchen table issues.’ In fact, people often choose the candidate they agree with ideologically over their immediate material well-being or there wouldn’t be this right-wing stuff to begin with. The whole idea that when you’re financially insecure you don’t care about democracy and human rights is an insult to poor people and a total miss of the rich people who would sell democracy and human rights and their mom to add to their billions.

George Lakoff insists that people don’t vote their self-interest. They vote their identities. I’ve ranted on this before: Thank you for not voting your best interests. It’s not that people don’t worry about the cost of living. They do. But people are more than balance sheets. Democrats would be well advised to treat them as more.

Professional soldiers don’t serve for the money. Plenty of others sold out their love of country and the Constitution for the thrill of seeing Donald Trump stomp their enemies. Some would rather go without eating than see their “lessers” get a leg up on the American Dream.

* * * * *

Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?

No King’s One Million Rising movement 
50501 
May Day Strong
Freedom Over Fascism Toolkit
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense