Skip to content

Month: October 2025

The Metaphors Write Themselves

No, terrorists did not fly a plane into the East Wing

Modified image via Rick Wilson.

It is often suggested that being the object of barbs at the 2011 White House correspondents’ dinner cemented Donald Trump’s resolve to seek the White House in 2016. Being lampooned by the country’s first Black president, Barack Obama, especially gnawed at the host of “The Apprentice.” That and Seth Meyers’s surprise that Trump was running as a Republican when Meyers thought he was “running as a joke.”

Trump bowed out of the 2012 race two weeks after his public roasting. But Trump meant to get even and here we are.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday that the Treasury Department “instructed employees not to share photos of the demolition of parts of the White House’s East Wing after images of construction equipment [Monday] dismantling the facade of the building went viral online.” Treasury sits across the drive from the East Wing.

The Hill reports, that “wrecking of part of the White House’s East Wing to make way for President Trump’s ballroom is striking a nerve with his critics who see it as an overhaul of a historic building for a gaudy personal project.”  

Gaudy? Google “Oval Office” and “whore house.”

The White House brags that Trump’s $250 million ballroom will be built with donated private monies (from corporations and billionaires). Former Bush II chief ethics lawyer Richard Painter calls the project “an ethics nightmare.” Pundit David Frum on Tuesday reframed the privately funded vanity project as demolishing the East Wing to erect “a monument to bribery.”

The Bulwark’s JV Last advises that Democrats should make restoring the White House and grounds to its pre-Trump state a 2028 campaign issue.

“Trump’s transformation of the People’s House into a presidential palace is undemocratic,” Last writes. “Presidents are not kings. Erasing this monstrosity is fundamental statement about the right-ordering of our project in self-government.”

The White House dismissed public dismay over the demolition as “manufactured outrage” by “unhinged leftists and their Fake News allies.” Trump previously pledged that the ballroom addition would not touch the existing structure.

Uh-huh.

* * * * *

Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?

No King’s One Million Rising movement 
50501 
May Day Strong
Freedom Over Fascism Toolkit
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Ok. Never Mind.

Uhm, no:

Secrets…

By the way:

Goldman on Comer's role in the Epstein coverup: "That Oversight investigation very specifically does not ask for the types of evidence where Trump's name, likeness would be — photos videos, audio, witness statements, the investigation origination documents. Oversight has not asked for those"

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2025-10-21T20:37:06.889Z

“Almost Too Outlandish To Believe”

The very meaning of chutzpah

You couldn’t make this up:

President Trump is demanding that the Justice Department pay him about $230 million in compensation for the federal investigations into him, according to people familiar with the matter, who added that any settlement might ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him or those in his orbit.

The situation has no parallel in American history, as Mr. Trump, a presidential candidate, was pursued by federal law enforcement and eventually won the election, taking over the very government that must now review his claims. It is also the starkest example yet of potential ethical conflicts created by installing the president’s former lawyers atop the Justice Department.

Mr. Trump submitted complaints through an administrative claim process that often is the precursor to lawsuits. The first claim, lodged in late 2023, seeks damages for a number of purported violations of his rights, including the F.B.I. and special counsel investigation into Russian election tampering and possible connections to the 2016 Trump campaign, according to people familiar with the matter. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because the claim has not been made public.

The second complaint, filed in the summer of 2024, accuses the F.B.I. of violating Mr. Trump’s privacy by searching Mar-a-Lago, his club and residence in Florida, in 2022 for classified documents. It also accuses the Justice Department of malicious prosecution in charging him with mishandling sensitive records after he left office.

Lawyers said the nature of the claims posed undeniable ethics challenges.

“What a travesty,” said Bennett L. Gershman, an ethics professor at Pace University. “The ethical conflict is just so basic and fundamental, you don’t need a law professor to explain it.”

He added: “And then to have people in the Justice Department decide whether his claim should be successful or not, and these are the people who serve him deciding whether he wins or loses. It’s bizarre and almost too outlandish to believe.”

Trump knows the optics are bad — he said that it looks like he’s suing himself, hahaha — but why should he care?

The Justice Department does not specifically require a public announcement of settlements made for administrative claims before they become lawsuits. If or when the Trump administration pays the president what could be hundreds of millions of dollars, there may be no immediate official declaration that it did so, according to current and former department officials.

Nothing is too bizarre and outlandish to believe. Nothing.

Update: Trump said today that if he gets it he’ll give the money to something nice. So that’s just fine. Never mind.

Glitches In The Nobel Quest

After all the pomp and circumstance of last week’s premature estravaganza, get a load of the latest on Trump’s “peace for all time”

WAR AND PEACE: President Donald Trump’s diplomatic efforts in the Middle East and potential talks to end Russia’s war in Ukraine are in delicate territory as news out of both regions threatens to derail peace progress.

On the ground in Israel: VP JD Vance arrived in Tel Aviv to meet with Israeli officials today as the administration works to ease tensions after Israel and Hamas accused each other of breaking the terms of the truce following a weekend of violence. But Vance said that this weekend’s incidents were not the reason for his visit: “I wanted to just see how things are going,” he said, per NYT’s Tyler Pager.

Amid growing White House concern that Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu might be the one to end the deal, Vance embarked on a day of what one U.S. official described to CNN as “Bibisitting.” The VP worked to downplay fears of a ceasefire collapse in his visit.

“What we’ve seen the past week gives me great optimism the ceasefire is going to hold,” Vance said at a news conference. He said he feels “very optimistic,” though he ceded: “Can I say with 100% certainty that it’s going to work? No.”

Vance also warned that a truce between both Hamas and Israel would take a “very, very long time,” urging Israel to extend a “little bit of patience” with Hamas’ pace of returning hostages’ remains, per AP’s Seung Min Kim. As for Hamas laying its weapons down, Vance declined to state a firm timeline: “I don’t think it’s actually advisable to say this has to be done in a week.” Special envoy Steve Witkoff reiterated Vance’s optimism, adding that progress is “exceeding where we thought we would be at this time.”

Meanwhile, Trump’s son-in-law and former adviser Jared Kushner told reporters that U.S. and allied countries may begin the reconstruction of Gaza in the parts of the war-torn enclave currently held by Israeli forces. Though Kushner said plans are still in flux, he reiterated that “no reconstruction funds will be going into areas that Hamas still controls,” adding that reconstruction “would give the Palestinians living in Gaza a place to go, a place to get jobs, a place to live,” per NYT.

Trump weighs in: “Numerous of our NOW GREAT ALLIES in the Middle East, and areas surrounding the Middle East, have explicitly and strongly, with great enthusiasm, informed me that they would welcome the opportunity, at my request, to go into GAZA with a heavy force and ‘straighten our Hamas’ if Hamas continues to act badly, in violation of their agreement with us,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post today. “There is still hope that Hamas will do what is right. If they do not, an end to Hamas will be FAST, FURIOUS, & BRUTAL!”

Yeah I’m sure other countries are more than anxious to get militarily involved in this. And Kush doesn’t seem to understand that Trump’s still wanting to put the Palestinians in trailer parks in the Sahara. They should probably get on the same page. (Either that or Grandpa’s glitching too and only remembering his brilliant ethnic cleansing brainstorm.)

Oh, and whatever “progress” Trump was expecting on Ukraine is falling apart too. Rubio and Lavrov spoke on the phone and the upshot was that nobody’s meeting any time soon.

I think Trump’s going to need to find another war or two to “solve” to keep his numbers up. These two aren’t doing what he wants them to do. Maybe he could just stop blowing up fishermen in the Caribbean.

The Frogs Made Him Do It

Lol. Mike Johnson actually found a way to blame the left for a pardoned January 6th insurrectionist being arrested for threatening to kill Hakeem Jeffries.

I will tell you this, the violence on the left is far more prevalent than the violence on the right.  The rhetoric you saw on display Saturday, we highlighted yesterday, plays into this. There are people that get triggered—deranged people in society when they hear elected officials participating in a rally that was paid for by Soros and sponsored by communists.

So the presumption here is that the deranged person saw Jeffries at the rally and decided to kill him because the protest was paid for by Soros and sponsored by Communists? Or was it the inflatable frogs?

Whatever. It’s all so triggering for the poor MAGA cultists.

A Little Birdie

Benny Johnson is one of the right wing influencers who was revealed to have taken hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Kremlin. Naturally that makes him an insider in the Trump White House. (He frequently travels with the president and Kristi Noem.)

Here’s the latest from this very professional podcaster and shitposter:

And, I personally believe that it is the most entertaining thing that has happened over the past nine months, that those communists who accused Donald Trump of crimes are guilty of the crimes in which they are accusing Donald Trump. It is the iron law of wokeism. It is actually part of Saul Alinsky’s plan. It is actually part of the Communist Manifesto. Every Bolshevik that has ever lived practiced this. We’re against the bourgeois because they’re gonna genocide us, and then the Bolsheviks go on to genocide half the population. Right? Like, we’re against the capitalists because they’re here to kill you, and then the communist will go and kill half the population. Right? Mao Zedong kills 60 million people. They will accuse you of the crimes of which they are guilty. Now we found this out with Letitia James. Leticia James accused Donald Trump of real estate mortgage crimes, and it turns out that she has now been caught cold committing those exact same crimes, but far worse than Donald Trump ever committed them. She’s been indicted for that. James Comey went after General Flynn, Donald Trump for lying to Congress, for lying under oath, for lying to the federal government and FBI. James Comey indicted for that exact same thing.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and John Brennan and James Clapper, they’re in very hot water because of what they did launching the Russia collusion hoax, raiding Donald Trump’s house and so on and so forth. It turns out that they’ve hoaxed themselves directly into some real legal trouble. And we hear that that’s going to be heating up quite quickly. Interesting little birdies tell us this.

The last I heard former presidents have immunity but maybe it really only applied to Republicans. I’m sure the Court can find a rationale for that.

The other two? Obviously, fair game. Lock her up and lock him up too.

Seriously, I very much doubt they are going after Obama and Clinton. That’s click bait. But Clapper? Yeah, no doubt.

Another “Splendid Little War”

Remember The Maine

Since Sept. 1, the United States has been blowing up boats in the Caribbean Sea and killing people on board with apparent impunity. The current known death toll stands at 32. According to President Donald Trump, the dead — and those the Navy continues to target — are Venezuelan “unlawful combatants” and “narco-terrorist” members of the Tren de Aragua gang and are alleged to be transporting drugs bound for America. This amounts to war on drug cartels, Trump has said, allowing the U.S. to act in self-defense.

As Salon’s Andrew O’Hehir has written, this “phony war” is indicative of the twisted pathology of Trump’s worldview. Reporting over the last week has made it clear: The danger of this situation going sideways becomes greater every day. And considering America’s history in the region, such an outcome almost seems pre-ordained.

Last week, Adm. Alvin Holsey, who heads the U.S. Southern Command, which oversees operations in Central and South America, resigned less than one year into his three-year term. Although the Pentagon did not give a reason for his departure, the New York Times reported that he had raised concerns about the boat attacks, as well as the larger drug counter-mission. 

Holsey’s is a high-ranking resignation, but he is not the first to resign or be forced out over the strikes against Venezuelan boats. On Oct. 15, CNN’s Natasha Bertrand reported on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s destruction of the Judge Advocate General’s Corps, with “multiple current and former JAGs telling CNN that the strikes do not appear lawful.” Doubts have also been raised within the defense department’s Office of General Counsel. The Pentagon has denied these reports, saying there is unanimous agreement that the strikes are lawful. 

They are not. As Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said on “Meet The Press” on Sunday, “[W]hen you kill someone, if you’re not in a declared war, you really need to know someone’s name at least. You have to accuse them of something. You have to present evidence. So all of these people have been blown up without any evidence of a crime.”

The president, though, does not seem to feel any moral obligation — or pressure — to produce any evidence, and over the weekend he inadvertently revealed the vacuity of the administration’s arguments. “It was my greatest honor to destroy a very large DRUG-CARRYING SUBMARINE that was navigating towards the United States on a well known narcotrafficking transit route,” he said in a social media post. While two were killed, Trump announced that the “two surviving terrorists are being returned to their Countries of origin, Ecuador and Colombia, for detention and prosecution.” 

Can we see the problem here? He killed two people because they were allegedly unlawful combatant terrorists with whom we are at war. But then he sent their two compatriots back to their home countries for prosecution? How does that make any sense? 

On Saturday night, Colombian President Gustavo Petro, went public with an accusation that in September, the U.S. murdered an innocent Colombian fisherman whose boat was in distress. Trump responded that Petro is an “illegal drug dealer” with “a fresh mouth toward America.” He announced that he would immediately halt all counter-narcotics aid payments to Colombia —  which seems counterproductive — and, needless to say, he also vowed to raise tariffs. 

On Sunday, Hegseth announced yet another boat strike. This time, its three passengers were alleged to be members of yet another gang — the Colombian Ejército de Liberación Nacional (ELN), which has long been a designated foreign terrorist organization. The timing certainly suggests the strike could be another of Trump’s patented paybacks, this time to the Colombian president with the “fresh mouth.” It appears that America has escalated its military mission to include yet another South American nation.

If all of this weren’t enough, last week Trump declared that he had approved covert operations in Venezuela, which certainly challenges the meaning of the word covert. The CIA has a long and checkered history in the region over many years, but I don’t think any president has been dim enough to announce it in advance. American interference in Latin American affairs has almost always led to total disaster. It’s hard to imagine that this crazy scheme won’t end up being the worst of all.

Perhaps the most famous American fiasco in the region was the Bay of Pigs. Conceived under President Dwight Eisenhower and greenlit in the early months of President John F. Kennedy’s administration, the aim was to overthrow Fidel Castro in Cuba. But it was a debacle of epic proportions and massive embarrassment for the U.S. Castro remained in power until 2008.

Before that came the U.S.-backed coup in Guatemala in 1954, during which the CIA deposed a democratically elected leader, ushered in decades of dictatorship and wars, and showed that even when the agency’s plans were successful there was calamity. Later, the U.S. government didn’t stop a military coup in Brazil, helped dissidents assassinate the leader of the Dominican Republic and covertly supported the insurgent contras in Nicaragua, leading to the Iran-Contra scandal.

But the most grotesque of U.S. interference in the region was the government’s complicity in the so-called “dirty wars” of Argentina and Chile in the 1970s. Under Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford, Secretary of State (and Nobel Peace Prize laureate) Henry Kissinger approved the repression of Argentina’s left-wing under the military junta that had overthrown the democratically elected government. At least 10,000 people were disappeared, murdered and tortured. In Chile, the U.S. backed a coup of the democratically elected socialist President Salvador Allende. The result was the brutal dictator Augusto Pinochet, whose spy master brought together all the right-wing governments in the region — including Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay — in support of Operation Condor, a campaign of repression against leftist movements and assassinations of individuals throughout the region. 

But the apparent template for Trump’s obsession with Venezuela was America’s invasion of Panama in 1989, which removed dictator Manual Noriega from power. According to official numbers, 514 Panamanian soldiers and civilians were killed in the invasion. Local tallies, though, placed the number “close to 1,000. Noriega was eventually arrested and brought to the U.S., where he was convicted on charges of drug trafficking, racketeering and money laundering. Since Noriega was actually a CIA asset, one might have thought the government could have removed him from power without all the fireworks. He was released to France in 2010. 

Even “Plan Colombia,” which was ostensibly a human rights oriented strategy conceived in the 1990s under the Clinton administration, had mixed results. Under this program, the U.S. provided economic aid to the country while strengthening the rule of law and supplying military equipment to fight drug cartels. Plan Colombia helped the economy and reduced violence overall, but it also displaced large numbers of people, and the drug eradication program was an environmental disaster. 

Presidential administrations have meddled in Latin America and South America for decades. While Trump is clownishly crude in his approach, he certainly isn’t the first president to use a “splendid little war” to prove U.S. dominance. And like all those before him, he’s almost certainly going to create a whole lot of human misery in the process.

Salon

There’s Something’s In My Eye

Seven million are singing and filming

When they started singing “This Land Is Your Land,” I lost it.

People for the American Way and the Dolores Huerta Foundation for Community Organizing released a short ad on Monday that urges “Americans to reject the cruelty and denial of due process of the federal ICE raids—and to meet this moment with creative, peaceful non-cooperation.”

This fictionalized account offers an aspirational example of community strength and solidarity, reminding us how, throughout history, vulnerable groups have been indiscriminately rounded up while others stood by in silence.

In “The People, United,” survivors of the Holocaust and the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II intervene as an ICE agent zip-ties the hands of a grandmother who has lived in the U.S. for forty years. Through visceral narrative storytelling, the film delivers a clear message: we must not repeat the painful mistakes of the past.

Yeah, Donald Trump’s sure to threaten their nonprofit status.

“In our news feeds, we have seen disturbing scenes of ICE agents treating even law-abiding  immigrants and their supporters with callous disregard for their humanity and basic civil rights,” said Svante Myrick, president of People For the American Way Foundation. “This short narrative film offers an inspiring vision—one where justice prevails because enough of us remember our history and have the courage to show up for our neighbors.”

Share it widely, especially in the land of MAGA where the shadows lie.

We are only beginning to see the back end of No Kings 2. Already the movement is generating songs and videos to meet the moment. No Woody Guthries out there yet, but one may hit.

Here are a couple tunes friends have run across.

This one’s AI, but kinda fun.

There’s a cultural shift coming. I can almost feel it.

* * * * *

Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?

No King’s One Million Rising movement 
50501 
May Day Strong
Freedom Over Fascism Toolkit
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Hop On The Bus, Gus

50 ways to screw your voters

GIF via Axios.

Donald Trump has asked MAGA acolytes in red states to redraw congressional district maps mid-decade to help fend off losing control of the U.S. House in 2026.

Democrats from around North Carolina are headed in busses to Raleigh this morning. They mean to protest the Republican effort to wring another Republican congressional seat from the state’s current 10R-4D delegation. The new map aims to make NC-1, an eastern district now held by Rep. Don Davis, more winnable by a Republican without threatening Republican Rep. Greg Murphy next door in NC-03. Trump is pleased.

Princeton’s Gerrymandering Project gives the proposed new map an “F” grade for fairness.

Donald Trump won North Carolina’s electoral votes in 2024 by 50.9% to 47.7% for Kamala Harris. NC-3 went uncontested by Democrats last year. Still, Democrats won 45.4% of the statewide congressional vote. Republicans won 54.6% but garnered 71.4% of seats. They’re gunning for 78.6% with the new map.

North Carolina has had multiple congressional maps since 2020. A court-ordered map redraw to restore a fair balance yielded a split of 7D-7R after the 2022 midterms. Then decisions by SCOTUS and a newly Republican state Supreme Court landed us where we were last November: 10R-4D.

The newest map (redrawn in a back room somewhere) advanced in the legislature on Monday. Democracy Docket reports:

President Donald Trump’s effort to rig the 2026 election spread to another GOP-controlled state Monday as North Carolina lawmakers advanced a gerrymandered map, clearing the way for a floor vote.

Ahead of the vote, North Carolina voters were escorted out of the hearing after reportedly chanting: “Racist maps make racist reps.” 

WRAL elaborates:

The Senate Elections Committee approved a new map released last week by state legislative leaders — the first official legislative approval in a multi-step process that is expected to give North Carolina Republicans another seat in Congress. The approval came as protesters accused Republican lawmakers of racism; the changes are expected to oust one of the state’s three Black members of Congress, by carving up an area of eastern North Carolina with a large Black population.

Redistricting Watch Rally in Raleigh, Oct. 21st, 11:30am 

* * * * *

Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?

No King’s One Million Rising movement 
50501 
May Day Strong
Freedom Over Fascism Toolkit
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Civil War Talk

The English civil war, that is

Chip Roy: “The truth is the marxist, radicals, and Islamists the Democratic Party promoted this weekend, they cannot handle the truth. The truth is that there is a king and that king is Jesus. And the president has been willing to say it, and Charlie Kirk was willing to say it and he got killed for it.”

FFS…

He sounds like a Charles the First Royalist who believes in the absolute power of the monarchy but just as they did, he and his accomplices propagandize it as a religious question to rile the rubes.

After years of war, the parliamentarians got sick of the Kings bullshit. It did not end well for him.