Skip to content

Month: November 2025

Nobody Is Safe

I remember wondering if it was wise for youngsters to apply for DACA before we had a law in place that could protect them. It was clear even then that the Republicans were hankering to deport themselves some foreigners. But I couldn’t have predicted the cruelty they are employing now.

Here’s a New York Times story (gift link) about some people married to US citizens being grabbed for deportation at their green card appointments:

The married couples filed into a federal building in San Diego last week for green card interviews that they believed would secure their future together in the United States. Half of each pair was American. Stephen Paul came with his British wife and their 4-month-old baby. Audrey Hestmark arrived with her German husband, days before their first wedding anniversary. Jason Cordero accompanied his Mexican wife.

It was supposed to be a celebratory milestone, the final step in the process to obtain U.S. permanent residency. Instead, as each interview with an immigration officer wrapped up, federal agents swooped in, handcuffed the foreign spouse and took him or her away. “I had to take our baby from my crying wife’s arms,” Mr. Paul, 33, said, recalling the moment that agents said they were arresting his wife, Katie.

Ms. Paul was sent to an immigration detention center with hundreds of other people swept up in the Trump administration’s crackdown. Her husband had to take a leave from his job at the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department to care for their child and try to secure her release. “It’s insane to have them rip our family apart,” Mr. Paul said. “Whoever is directing this has completely lost touch with their mission to the country.”

In recent weeks, immigration lawyers in several cities have seen a surge in arrests of foreign spouses of Americans during interviews at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services offices.

In San Diego alone, immigration lawyers in the region estimate that several dozen foreign-born spouses have been detained since Nov. 12, when the new tactic first surfaced, according to Andrew Nietor, an immigration lawyer. A former chair of the San Diego chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, Mr. Nietor said the estimate was based on members’ communications about their clients. The exact number of spouses detained is unclear because many couples attend the routine interviews without lawyers, who would alert colleagues. The government has not disclosed a tally of such detentions.

In every case, agents with Immigration and Customs Enforcement told the applicants that they had overstayed tourist or business visas. An arrest warrant, reviewed by The New York Times, states that “there is probable cause to believe” that the named spouse is “removable from the United States.”

All the stories are the same. Some minor infraction or something that’s been policy for years and now the Trump administration has arbitrarily decided to change it resulting in the spouse of an American citizen being detained at their last green card hearing before their case is fully resolved.

The pain and suffering they are causing in order to literally rid this country of foreigners is more stunning every day.

The Beeb Capitulates

Another institution prostrates itself at the feet of Donald Trump:

Earlier this month, you may recall, President Donald Trump angrily threatened to sue the British Broadcasting Corporation for $1 billion over its use of footage of his speech just before the January 6, 2021, insurrection. Unlike Trump’s other lawsuits against media companies, this threat wasn’t entirely baseless: The BBC ended up admitting that its edit of the footage did misleadingly create the “impression of a direct call for action,” and several executives resigned, citing a need to be “transparent” about what had happened. Trump celebrated their ouster.

Now the BBC has overcorrected—albeit in the other direction. On Bluesky, historian Rutger Bregman just charged that the broadcaster cut a line from a BBC lecture he delivered, in which he described Trump as “the most openly corrupt president in American history.”

Is it really now beyond the pale for the BBC to air an accurate description of Trump’s open and explicit corruption and to correctly situate it in the American historical context? The answer, unfortunately, appears to be yes.

Asked for comment on Bregman’s charge, a spokesperson for the BBC emailed me this: “All of our programmes are required to comply with the BBC’s editorial guidelines, and we made the decision to remove one sentence from the lecture on legal advice.

He threatened them with a billion dollar lawsuit, they apologized and now they’re self-censoring.

The media is killing itself.

Demetia Disinhibition

Yes, he called the reporter ugly…

This is going to get worse and worse. He’s always been a crude and ignorant brute but he’s losing more and more control.

Here’s a gift link to the NY Times article he rails against in that social media feed. It is actually far too kind to him because it only discusses his reduced energy not his clearly declining mental faculties. But it sure made him mad…

Who Needs Tourism?

xenophobia: fear and contempt of strangers or foreigners or of anything designated as foreign, or a conviction that certain foreign individuals and cultures represent a threat to the authentic identity of one’s own nation-state and cannot integrate into the local society peacefully. The term xenophobia derives from the ancient Greek words xenos (meaning “stranger”) and phobos (meaning “fear”). Xenophobia implies the perception that not only is it impossible for certain people designated as foreign to integrate into one’s own society but also that they pose a threat to the integrity of that society.

We are awash in that bullshit and it’s simply bizarre in a country that was settled and populated by immigrants over two centuries. The only people who have a right to say this are Native Americans and these so-called “patriots” hate them too!

I can’t wrap my mind around how dumb this is.

By the way, Nick Sorter is that guy in Portland who grabbed the protester’s burning flag and became a MAGA cause celebre with Kristi Noem stepping in to say they would prosecute the protester.

The Lovefest Hit A Little Turbulence

They were all over each other in public but behind the scenes Trump and MBS had a little spat. Unsurprisingly, it’s because Trump seems to think that he can flatter Muslim countries into embracing Israel after what it did in Gaza, which is simply daft:

White House officials told the crown prince ahead of the meeting that Trump expected progress on normalizing Saudi relations with Israel.

  • During the Nov. 18 meeting, Trump was the one who raised the issue and pressed hard MBS to join the Abraham Accords, U.S. officials say.
  • The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020, normalized relations between Israel and several other Arab nations. They were a key foreign policy achievement in Trump’s first term.
  • At that point the conversation got tense, the officials say. As Trump pressed, MBS pushed back.
  • MBS explained to Trump that although he wants to do move forward with normalization with Israel, he can’t do so now because Saudi public opinion is highly anti-Israel in the aftermath of the Gaza war. He said Saudi society isn’t ready for such a move now, the three sources told Axios.

Trump and MBS were civil but the conversation was tough, one source with knowledge of the meeting and a U.S. official said.

  • “The best way to say it is disappointment and irritation. The president really wants them to join the Abraham Accord. He tried very hard to talk him. It was an honest discussion. But MBS is a strong man. He stood his ground,” the source said.
  • MBS demanded that in return for a peace deal with Saudi Arabia, Israel should agree to “an irreversible, credible and time-bound path” for a Palestinian state. MBS also made that clear publicly, after the meeting.
  • Israel’s government opposes any path for a Palestinian state.
  • “MBS never said no to normalization. The door is open for doing it later. But the two-state solution is an issue,” a U.S. official said.

Duh. Trump is really dreaming here:

  • “Now that Iran’s nuclear program has been totally obliterated and the war in Gaza has ended, it is very important to President Trump that all Middle Eastern countries join the Abraham Accords, which will advance peace in the region,” the White House official said.

Trump also told MBS that he was going to supply them with the same F-35 fighter jets that Israel has (obviously trying to bride them) which outraged Israel and Rubio had to rush in to clean up the mess by telling Israel that we are just selling the Saudis the inferior F-35s.

We know Trump defended MBS ordering the killing and dismembering of Jamaal Kashogi but he also failed to defend the 9/11 families. As usual.

During his meeting with MBS, Trump didn’t raise the terrorism lawsuit that 9/11 victims’ families filed against Saudi Arabia. A judge recently allowed the lawsuit to go forward, citing overwhelming evidence of the kingdom’s complicity in the attack that killed 2,977 people.

It’s a good thing that a reporter didn’t bring it up or they would have been scolded for embarrassing their guest and Trump would have threatened to withdraw their broadcast license.

It’s just one embarrassing bull-in-a-china-shop moment after another. They all pretend to love him because he’s easily manipulated and hasn’t got a clue. But they’re not going to do anything they don’t want to do.

The Envoy

Norwegian journalist Їne Back Їversen has some thoughts about the BFF who’s helping the Russians work the president. (I can’t vouch for all of this but FWIW, X’s AI Grok substantiates the sources.)

1: Let’s talk about Steve Witkoff, because I think the narrative of him being a “useful idiot” is a dangerous trap to walk in.

It’s darker than that.

Witkoff has spent three decades swimming in russian money, russian mob circles, and russian real-estate pipeline.

A thread 🧵

2: He isn’t just “a MAGA dude” advising Trump on Russia–Ukraine.
Witkoff is of russian descent, built his fortune through NYC networks flooded with post-Soviet criminal money, and is now pushing the kremlin wishlist so called “peace plan”
It’s not a coincidence.
It’s continuity.

3: In the 1990s, Manhattan’s luxury real estate became the #1 laundromat for russian criminal networks fleeing the collapse of the USSR.

The FBI has testified to Congress about this era. It was no secret.

And who rose to power right then?
Steve Witkoff & Donald Trump.


4: Trump Tower in the 80s–90s was filled with:
•russian mobsters
•arms dealers
•money launderers
•“businessmen” tied to Semion Mogilevich
•shell companies buying in cash

Trump didn’t just tolerate it — he blindly” welcomed it.

5; Trumps buddy Witkoff played on the commercial version of the same ecosystem.

While Trump handled condos bought with suitcases of cash, Witkoff handled big office buildings financed through opaque partnerships & distressed sellers.

Two men, one pipeline of russian capital.


6: fast-forward 2024–25
Witkoff is Trump’s point man on Russia–Ukraine policy.

A man with:
• zero diplomatic background
• zero Ukraine expertise
&
• A large russian network
• A history of loud Pro-kremlin stans

And here we are again, with the U.S flashing russias wishlist.

7: Déjà vu:
2016, Paul Manafort(Former Trump Campaign Chairman) met Konstantin Kilimnik (a russian intel asset) to discuss a “peace plan” for Ukraine that:
• legitimized russia’s invasion
• installed a Moscow-approved leader
• lifted sanctions
• forced Kyiv to negotiate under duress

Sound familiar?




8: And how absurd isn’t it, to hear Trump again and again say “The war would have never started if I were president”

When he knows darn well russia invaded Ukraine in 2014. And you better believe that the Manafort “Peace Plan” conversations, Trump have heard of many MANY times.

9: And here we are again, this time with a 28-point “peace plan” presented handed over by Witkoff.

Same unhinged demands.
Same twisted narratives.

This is not innovation.
This is recycling Kremlin policy.
Delivered by business partners disguised as diplomacy.

10: Let’s go back to Trump round 1 again.

It’s easy to forget how disturbing Trump’s private meetings with Putin were:
•No US officials present
•No transcripts
• No accountability
•Interpreters’ notes seized
•Policy outcomes mysteriously aligned with Russian goals

11: And it’s the same now;
• Trump’s closed Alaska meeting with Putin.
• Witkoff’s quiet trips to Moscow
• Off-record negotiations about Ukraine
•No transparency? Just “take my word for it”

Why is US policy on Ukraine being decided behind closed doors, without Ukraine?!

12: Yet the US demand from Ukraine is a the complete opposite, constant transparency, public statements, oversight, disclosures, visibility, “THANK ME!”

But from Russia?
Not a single demand, just “give them two weeks”

This isn’t diplomacy. It’s appeasement.

13: Witkoff’s public statements are indistinguishable from russian propaganda regarding russian language, “Territory is negotiable.” Etc

Even in 2018, Witkoff criticized Western economic sanctions against Russia, imposed after Russias illegal annexation of Crimea.


14: And notice how Witkoff consistently omits:
• russian war crimes
• mass deportations
• missile strikes on civilians
• nuclear blackmail
• the documented genocide intent

Selective ignorance.
Aimed to whitewash & erase russias crimes & force the victim to compromise.

15: And many say; Witkoff & Trump are business men, or they want a deal.

Their deals with Russia was done long ago, many times, now they Witkoff & Trump is doing their part of it:

Appease Moscow.
Pressure Ukraine.
Undermine sanctions.
Force a deal.
Declare it “peace.”

16: Witkoff made his career in a world where russian money laundering was normalized depicted as “investors,” “partners,” or “buyers.”
The same world that Manafort monetized, Trump depended on & russian intelligence used as cover.

They didn’t exit that world, they brought it in.


17: Witkoff operates with zero scrutiny, because he’s framed as a “businessman” instead of a geopolitical actor.

But he is shaping:
• US posture toward russia
• U.S stance on war crimes
• The direction of NATO policy
• Ukraines future security

Off the books, next to russia.

18:
2016: Manafort + Kilimnik → “peace plan”
2024: Witkoff → “peace plan”
2017–2019: Trump–Putin private meetings → unknown concessions
2024–2025: Trump–Russia Alaska talks → unknown concessions

This isn’t coincidence.
It’s repetition.
A pattern.
Collaborations.


19: Witkoff is openly declaring the U.S advocates for russia. It’s not concealed. It’s directly hostile to Ukraine & EU security.

That’s the man who sit with russia tasked to “negotiate” Ukraine, without Ukraine at the table.

The pressure, demands & ultimatum fall on Ukraine.

20: Witkoff is a russian echo chamber.

“Ukraine should give up land.”
“Ukraine can’t win.”
“Peace requires Ukrainian concessions.”

These are not “opinions.”
These are Kremlin foreign-policy objectives. And Witkoff have publicly stated this long before his current position.

21: The pattern is clear:

1990s: russian capital enters NYC real estate, money that both Trump & Witkoff thrives on.
2016; russia uses these lines for political access
2024 : Witkoff re-emerges as Trump’s Russia whisperer
2025: A new Kremlin-shaped “peace plan” is born

22: The “russia hoax”-is far from a hoax. It’s misunderstood.
Are they russian agents? Probably not. Are they vessels for russian policies with a history in the network. 1000%!

They are men whose worldview, networks & financing were shaped inside a system of russian influence.

23: The question isn’t “Is he compromised?” The question is:

Why is US policy on Russia being shaped by someone whose entire worldview was formed in the one American industry russian intelligence spent decades infiltrating?

Ask; why is there so much willingness to ignore it?

As I noted yesterday Witkoff was recorded giving the Russians tips on how to manipulate Trump. And it worked:

Reporter: Do you think do you think that Ukraine was being asked to give too much land back to Russia? I know at one point you said it shouldn’t have to give any.

Trump: The way it’s going, if you look, it’s just moving in one direction. So eventually that’s land that over the next couple of months might be gotten by Russia anyway…

Might as well just give them the whole country.

What Have We Become … Again?

Outsourcing torture all over

It took the Iraq invasion to get me off the couch in mid-career. Then came Abu Ghraib and extraordinary renditions. I began my op-ed on the latter like this:

Gulfstream’s executive jets are popular with U.S. intelligence agencies, and luxurious. More luxurious than destinations their manacled and diapered passengers have disappeared to thanks to “extraordinary rendition,” also known as “outsourcing torture.”

For terror suspects en route to exotic prisons in Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, and Uzbekistan, the tranquilizing suppositories are complimentary.

The masterminds of those atrocities never stood in the dock in the U.S. or the Netherlands. I despair that the people resonsible for this won’t either. The New Yorker‘s Sarah Stillman explains:

One Saturday morning in early September, I got a WhatsApp video call from eleven strangers locked inside a secretive detention camp in a forest in Ghana. Their faces looked glazed with sweat and stricken with fear. In the background, I could hear birdsong and the drone of insects. An armed guard watched over the group as they huddled around a shared cellphone.

“There are big snakes here, and scorpions!” a male voice with an American accent called out.

“My stomach is really hurting, and we have to beg for food,” another man said.

A third added, “We fear we’ll be tortured and killed.”

A car salesman and a real estate agent introduced Stillman to their plight. One prisoner had worked for UPS, another worked in his mother’s catering business. A third “composed R. & B. music.” Some hed fled to the U.S. for asylum. That was before January 20 of this year.

All of them had been taken from the United States against their will. Nearly all had been granted forms of legal relief that bar the government from deporting them to their home countries. At the heart of the protections they’d received was one of the most basic and sacrosanct concepts in both U.S. and international law: non-refoulement. This principle means that no nation should intentionally deport or expel people to a place where they are likely to face torture, persecution, death, or other grave harms.

The Catch 22 of the Trump 2.0 administration is that it has no principles.

I mentioned the group Trump disappeared to Eswatini back in September. Digby reported in October on a man freed from prison after a life behind bars for a murder he didn’t commit. Upon his release, ICE snatched him for deportation before he could go home. She asked, “What the hell have we become? My God

I haven’t finished reading Stillman’s piece. It brings back bad memories and I need a break. I spent time on Twitter yesterday and this morning until my very spirit felt drained. The shameless lies and casual cruelty were too much. What have we become … again?

* * * * *

Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?

No King’s One Million Rising movement 
50501 
May Day Strong
Freedom Over Fascism Toolkit
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

O Irony, Where Is Thy Sting?

Right here. Your nephew, Karoline.

Bruna Ferreira, from GoFundMe site.

Tokyo Rose Garden won’t bat an eye. Nevertheless (Daily Beast):

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has been personally linked to the brutal ICE raids sweeping America.

Her 11-year-old nephew’s mother, Bruna Ferreira, is now in custody at an ICE facility at Louisiana, facing deportation to Brazil.

Michael Leavitt, the press secretary’s New Hampshire-based brother, had a relationship with Ferreira, resulting in the birth of son Michael Leavitt Jnr.

[…]

A source familiar to the matter told the Daily Beast that “This individual is the mother of Karoline’s nephew and they have not spoken in many years. The child has lived full time in New Hampshire with his father since he was born. He has never resided with his mother.”

The statement about the child never residing with his mother “since he was born” is contradicted by a 2014 North Andover Eagle-Tribune story on Michael Leavitt’s winning $1 million on Draft Kings. The three shared a condo in Atkinson, Mass New Hampshire. Daily Beast reported that but failed to note that it contradicted their “source” (White House? DHS?) quoted earlier.

WBUR:

WBUR could not immediately confirm whether the boy only lived with his father after the couple separated. The split happened about 10 years ago, according to a family member.

Karoline Leavitt declined to comment on the arrest. The administration official said, “Karoline had no involvement whatsoever in this matter.”

Well, that’s not surprising.

DHS spokesliar Tricia McLaughlin claims Ferreira has a previous arrest for battery. However, WBUR could find no battery charges in Massachusetts’ online court records.

That’s not surprising either.

“Bruna has no criminal record whatsoever, I don’t know where that is coming from. Show us the proof,” said Todd Pomerleau, an attorney for Ferreira (ABC News):

Pomerleau also said Ferreira entered the country lawfully, previously held DACA status and is currently in the process of obtaining a green card. He said his client was arrested in her car in Massachusetts after being stopped with no warrant, adding that he now has to litigate her case in Louisiana thousands of miles away from her home. Pomerleau said he did not believe that his client’s connection to Karoline Leavitt could affect the case, adding that he believes it’s just “happenstance.” 

Another brown person stopped and arrested at random that DHS must now redfine as a dangerous criminal to support its “worst of the worst” narrative.

Update 2: Corrected state above. Atkinson is in New. (h/t HH for catching that.)

Update:

* * * * *

Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?

No King’s One Million Rising movement 
50501 
May Day Strong
Freedom Over Fascism Toolkit
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink 
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Inexplicable

I would imagine that most of you have heard about the Olivia Nuzzi account of her relationship with RFK Jr and her former fiance Ryan Lizza’s tell all about the same question. I’m not sure why we should care about all these creepy people but it’s a titillating sorry and everybody likes on of those on some level.

I read the excerpt of her book in Vanity Fair and frankly, it’s incomprehensible. She clearly had a very talented editor at New York magazine because this is just .. no. I also read the first (free) installment of Lizza’s tell all and it was an explicit tabloid account of it from his perspective. Yuck. (I didn’t read the second installment because I didn’t want to pay for it but from what I can gather, RFK Jr. is one sick, misogynist monster and Lizza is a nasty little creep as well.)

This question posed by Inae Oh of Mother Jones is the big question to me and it’s one I’ve asked myself my whole life. Him? Why?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s name may not appear in Olivia Nuzzi’s forthcoming memoir, American Canto. But the 71-year-old secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services is at the burning core of Nuzzi’s return to the public eye this month, after her firing last year over a “digital affair” with the then-presidential candidate while she covered the 2024 campaign for New York magazine. The unfolding drama, following the publication of a lavishly photographed New York Times profile and Vanity Fair excerpt, is expected to grow more fraught when a reported collection of “sexually charged” text messages appears next month.

American Cantoas it appears in Vanity Fair, is profoundly unreadable, packed with prose that relies on a reader’s tolerance to witness humiliating forms of self-sabotage. Nuzzi describes outrunning a California wildfire while, for some reason, obsessing over Kennedy as she tries to escape. (She also appears to invite readers into conflating the fire she is fleeing with the devastating Palisades wildfire that destroyed the region two months later.) As much as American Canto reads like a diaristic slot machine of half-thoughts and self-absorbed efforts at profundity, it is also startlingly effective in its depiction of a woman deteriorating in the throes of potent desire. Here is how Nuzzi describes “the Politician.”

I loved his brain. I hated the idea of an intruder therein. Others thought he was a madman; he was not quite mad the way they thought, but I loved the private ways that he was mad. I loved that he was insatiable in all ways, as if he would swallow up the whole world just to know it better if he could. He made me laugh, but I winced when he joked about the worm. “Baby, don’t worry,” he said. “It’s not a worm.”

Again, him?

I ask myself that question about Trump as well but at least he had the promise of real money. What in the world do all these women see in Bobby Jr? He supposedly had so many affairs that his then-wife ended up killing herself.

Why?

Jared And Steve’s Excellent Adventure

I knew it. Trump and his henchmen were so in love with themselves after their phony victory parade in the middle east, they genuinely thought they could just knock out peace in Ukraine and call it a day:

It started with an October order from President Trump to his national security team: Come up with a plan to end the Ukraine war just as they had halted the fighting in Gaza.

On a flight back from the Middle East, in the afterglow of brokering a deal between Israel and Hamas, envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner began writing the first draft of what would eventually become a 28-point peace framework to end the four-year war, according to U.S. officials and a person familiar with the situation.

Witkoff and Kushner’s monthlong effort to draft the proposal relied on input from a Kremlin insider who held secret meetings with the aides in Miami, U.S. officials and people familiar with the matter said. A senior Ukrainian official also organized at least two calls with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, officials said.

Because the two situations were so much alike.

These people are all narcissists who actually believe Dear Leader is a magic man. He is not. And neither are they.

By the way:

Since the US-brokered Gaza ceasefire went into effect on October 10, 2025, at least 345 Palestinians have been killed and 889 injured by Israeli attacks, according to the Gaza Government Media Office as of November 22, 2025. 

Update —

It’s even worse than we thought:

US presidential envoy Steve Witkoff, fresh from the triumph of the Gaza peace deal, held a phone call last month with a senior Kremlin official to suggest they work together on a similar plan for Ukraine — and that Vladimir Putin should raise it with Donald Trump.

In an Oct. 14 phone call that lasted a little over five minutes, Witkoff advised Yuri Ushakov, Putin’s top foreign policy aide, on how the Russian leader should broach the issue with Trump. His guidance included suggestions on setting up a Trump-Putin call before Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s White House visit later that week and using the Gaza agreement as a way in.

“We put a 20-point Trump plan together that was 20 points for peace and I’m thinking maybe we do the same thing with you,” Witkoff told Ushakov, according to a recording of the conversation reviewed and transcribed by Bloomberg.

To read the full transcript of the call, click here.

It’s like they’re dealing with a stupid child: