Skip to content

Month: January 2026

Killing The Golden Goose

If you read me regularly you know that I’ve often lamented the fact that Trump and his henchmen are so foolish that they are actually killing the golden goose out of sheer ignorance and hubris. But I’ve never seen it illustrated as clearly as Andrew Egger does today:

Growing up, I never really understood Aesop’s fable about the goose that laid the golden egg. It’s a cautionary tale about greed and hubris: A farmer with a miraculous goose that lays a solid-gold egg every morning gets fed up with passive wealth generation and figures killing the bird will speed things along. But alas: He finds no store of eggs within and realizes he butchered his meal ticket for nothing. The moral’s straightforward, but it never really worked for me as a story. Like, come on: Nobody’s that stupid.

Well, almost nobody, I guess.

As long as I live, I don’t think I’ll get over this pure, dumb fact: Trump told his fans he had to blow up the liberal order because it was the only way to secure the very benefits the liberal order was already bringing us.

Trump insists America needs Greenland as a strategic positioning ground from which to restrain Russia and China in the Arctic. But thanks to the liberal order, this was something we already enjoyed. Through the magic of multilateral cooperation, we were able to treat someone else’s territory as though it were our own for the purposes of military positioning—not by bribing or intimidating them, but because they agreed their interests and our interests aligned.

Trump insists America needs to blow up America’s preexisting economic relationships to ensure America gets an advantageous position in international trade. But America already had such an advantageous position: an orderly world economic system that had lavished previously unimaginable prosperity on America and to the entire globe, with us at the proverbial (and very profitable) head of the table.

It’s not just that Trump had the hubris to think he could hero-ball the country to a better deal by canceling a century of history and starting over. It’s that his own broken personality—his miserable meanness, his dispositional inability to cooperate with and trust others—has always prevented him from understanding what was good about the deal we had to begin with. The idea that multipolar agreements could be better for America, in some cases, than outright ownership—that, say, we already have everything we need from Greenland—he rejects as ridiculous. Ownership, he told the New York Times, is “what I feel is psychologically needed for success. . . . I think that ownership gives you a thing that you can’t do, whether you’re talking about a lease or a treaty.”

I’m not surprised that Trump would feel this way. He has the disordered mind of a psychologically damaged child. But the fact that so many of his henchmen who surely know better are still going along, perhaps because they think they can cash in before the whole thing implodes or just because they don’t trust their own knowledge or instincts in the face of what they see as Trump’s omnipotent ability to always come out on top, is the real mystery.

They have the most power in this culture when it comes to stopping Trump. They could have done it in a heartbeat and instead they decided to ride with this orange monster. It just proves, once again, that any idea that the Big Money Boyz are so much savvier and smarter than everyone else when it comes to the economy is a huge mistake. Their “animal spirits” run stronger than their brains and something about Trump apparently gets those spirits aroused.

Groyper Hero

I thought you;’d be interested to hear what millions of young incels (and the girls who inexplicably follow them) are hearing every day from their leader:

NICK FUENTES (HOST): We’re going to talk about Trump’s potential invocation of the Insurrection Act in Minneapolis. I wish he would. I wish he would. He keeps talking about it amid the unrest and riots in Minneapolis in response to the ICE deployment. By the way, nobody has been arrested. Do you know that? There have been all these riots happening in Minneapolis. Last night, you have an ICE agent — I think, actually it happened this afternoon. He shot a Venezuelan illegal because he was trying to arrest this guy and a bunch of agitators came out and hit him with shovels. And so ICE barged in, arrested everybody. 

But in Minneapolis, there’s straight up riots going on. They’re shooting fireworks at cops, taking over hotels. It’s mayhem.

… 

Do you know that Minneapolis police arrested zero people last night? So when you see these videos of fireworks blowing up and cops getting beat and the absolute anarchy that’s unfolding, nobody’s even getting arrested. So Trump says, “I’ll invoke the Insurrection Act.”

Bro, do it. Do something. Just stop chickening out. I’m just tired of the idle threats. “We’re going to bomb you,” “we’re going to tariff you,” “we’re going to invoke the Insurrection Act.” Always chickens out. Just do it. You’re the commander in chief. He does it every time. He did it during the BLM riots, he did it during the LA riots. Please pull the trigger. Please kill them, Mr. President. Please just kill them. Not actually. I don’t actually, I’m not actually wishing for violence, but please send in the military and restore order. This is your country. You are the commander in chief of the armed forces. You are the chief executive over this country and it is lawless. Take some responsibility, take the reins, send in the military. If this Jewish communist running the city won’t arrest these people, if this gay cuck governor, Tim Walz, doesn’t do it, send in the military. That’s why you were elected.

I don’t get it. This happened the last time in Minneapolis, BLM, summer of love. Trump kept threatening, “I’ll send them in. I swear I’ll do it. I’ll invoke the Insurrection Act.” Do it. Throw these people in jail. They are trash.

It’s not just Fox, folks. There is a whole generation of right wingers coming up on this stuff. They don’t watch the old people on TV. I don’t think they watch TV at all. THIS is what they are into.

There’s always been a fringe faction that thinks and talks like this. But this has scope. Fuentes is actually, as are the others of his ilk who are saying the same sort of violent stuff. They gather on forums like 4Chan, telegram and Discord and spend all of their time staring at screens with very little actual interaction with other humans in the flesh. ( Maybe it’s less threatening than it seems because of that?) But it seems to me that it’s a problem for these people if not for the whole society and I don’t have the vaguest idea of what to do about it.

Computer Says Yes

Give him a gold-painted award for World’s Dumbest

Donald Trump just finished his hour-plus speech to the World Economic Forum. Former Vice President Al Gore told CNN he does not envy the fact checkers.

Is this the dumbest speech a world leader has ever given at WEF?

“Not only is this man crazy, he’s also a blazing idiot.”

“This is like listening to a drunk relative unhappily slurring through the unwrapping of presents at Christmas”

(The U.S. never got anything from NATO except our NATO allies — Denmark among them — invoking Article 5 after September 11, and sending their troops to Afghanistan to bleed and die for us.)

Is someone experimenting with using bullshit as a source of alternative energy? I’d like to invest.

What Now, America?

Adapting to a new reality

If you haven’t watched Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s speech to the World Economic Forum from Tuesday, take 17 minutes to watch it while you sip your coffee.

Carney declares in Davos, Switzerland that the rules-based order of the post-war world is over. In fact, it never was. It was a fantasy we all accepted because it served our mutual interests.

A rupture, not a transition

American hegemony “helped provide public goods, open sea lanes, a stable financial system, collective security, and support for frameworks for resolving disputes.” So we pretended that rules were rules while the hegemons violated them at will and the world looked away:

This bargain no longer works.

Let me be direct. We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.

Over the past two decades, a series of crises in finance, health, energy and geopolitics have laid bare the risks of extreme global integration. But more recently, great powers have begun using economic integration as weapons, tariffs as leverage, financial infrastructure as coercion, supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited.

You cannot live within the lie of mutual benefit through integration when integration becomes the source of your subordination.

What do we do now, Carney asks, when globalization has led to domination? Aim for greater strategic autonomy or a new model for cooperation? Canada is reevaluating its posture. The reality is that not every trading and alliance partner shares its values. (Looking at you, United States.)

We are calibrating our relationships so their depth reflects our values, and we’re prioritizing broad engagement to maximize our influence, given the fluidity of the world at the moment, the risks that this poses and the stakes for what comes next.

And we are no longer just relying on the strength of our values, but also the value of our strength.

He outlines Canada’s recent moves. A kind of reset.

We’ve agreed to a comprehensive strategic partnership with the EU, including joining SAFE, the European defence procurement arrangements. We have signed 12 other trade and security deals on four continents in six months.

In the past few days, we’ve concluded new strategic partnerships with China and Qatar. We’re negotiating free trade pacts with India, ASEAN, Thailand, Philippines and Mercosur.

We’re doing something else: to help solve global problems, we’re pursuing variable geometry. In other words, different coalitions for different issues based on common values and interests. So on Ukraine, we’re a core member of the Coalition of the Willing and one of the largest per capita contributors to its defence and security.

On Arctic sovereignty, we stand firmly with Greenland and Denmark and fully support their unique right to determine Greenland’s future.

Our commitment to NATO’s Article 5 is unwavering, so we’re working with our NATO allies, including the Nordic-Baltic Eight, to further secure the alliance’s northern and western flanks, including through Canada’s unprecedented investments in over-the-horizon radar, in submarines, in aircraft, and boots on the ground — boots on the ice.

Canada strongly opposes tariffs over Greenland and calls for focused talks to achieve our shared objectives of security and prosperity in the Arctic.

Carney does not mention Donald Trump or the United States by name in reference to tariffs or to Greenland, but his message is clear. The U.S. can no longer be trusted as guarantor of order and stability. The “middle powers must act together because if we’re not at the table, we’re on the menu.”

The cooks in this analogy are the United States, Russia, and China. And for Canada, primarily the U.S.

In a world of great power rivalry, the countries in-between have a choice: compete with each other for favour, or combine to create a third path with impact. We shouldn’t allow the rise of hard power to blind us to the fact that the power of legitimacy, integrity, and rules will remain strong if we choose to wield it together.

It’s a brave new world for the “middle powers,” with no going back. The nations in Davos must acknowledge the fantasy and face the new reality realistically, Carney argues. Whether the rest of the EU accepts Carney’s assessment that

The powerful have their power. But we have something too: the capacity to stop pretending, to name realities, to build our strength at home, and to act together.

Likely there are quiet planning meetings happening in Davos as states in attendance recognize that the United States they once admired and respected falls into fascism with imperialist designs.

Here on this continent (with Canada and Mexico), Americans have to sort out whether we will allow a madman to demand that the western world accede to his demands for obeisance lest he throw over the game board. That is, if there are enough of us with the right stuff to fight back against Trump and his gang of thieves.

We too have operated under a comfortable fiction that America’s stability over the years was built on our constitution, our laws, and our democratic traditions. Trumpism ripped that veil away to reveal how much the entire edifice of Exceptionalism was built on “norms.” It was only a gentleman’s agreement that our leaders behave like gentlemen, until the country fell for a con man and cult leader. Not once, but twice. Trumpism ripped the masks off neighbors who wave American flags, boast of their real Americanness, and loudly profess faith in Jesus, not Christianity as a system of values but as an authoritarian agenda. It was so much vapid branding.

“America isn’t the way it is because [Trump is] president. He’s president because America is the way it is,” as Canadian journalist David Cochrane explained two weeks ago. He seems to have anticipated Carney’s Davos speech.

The American challenge going forward is to examine our weaknesses, acknowledge them honestly, and adapt. There is no going back. Norms have failed us. We have failed ourselves. Barbarians are not at the gate. They are in the Oval Office and in the streets of Minneapolis. They are staged to invade Greenland.

Canada has figured it out. Americans seem the last to know.

The Price Of Eggs

Those of you who read this blog regularly will recognize this analysis by JV Last since it’s one that I’ve been discussing ever since Trump won back in 2016. This was not inevitable but the writing was on the wall from the beginning:

We are witness to something rare in human history: Abdication by the leader of the global order.

We have seen empires fall and civilizations crumble. But we’ve almost never seen a people renounce their leadership of the world—all at once, in full public view. That is what has happened in the 365 days since January 20, 2025.

Here’s what comes next.

The blinding of Five Eyes. The UKUSA intelligence sharing agreement—informally known as Five Eyes—has been in danger since Tulsi Gabbard was appointed director of national intelligence. But we’ve gone further than the possibility of having a Russia sympathizer atop the U.S. intelligence community: America’s allies now understand that we are—at best—a strategic competitor to Canada and the United Kingdom and at worst a threat to the other English-speaking countries. The days of intelligence sharing between America and our former allies are drawing to a close.

The death of NATO. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization was conceived as a way to tame Europe. By establishing the United States as the strategic counterweight to the continent, NATO (a) held the Soviets in check but also (b) removed the need for Germany to re-arm at a scale sufficient to tip the local military balance and menace its neighbors.

NATO is now a zombie organization. America has progressed from unreliable ally to overt threat to European sovereignty. Europe will re-arm. There is no longer any question on this point.

The new nuclear age begins. The world’s three largest nuclear powers are now expansionist predator states. This leaves the lesser nuclear powers no choice but to create their own umbrellas while buying time for smaller allies to join the nuclear club. Germany, Poland, and Canada will acquire nuclear weapons. So will Japan. Sweden, Australia, and South Korea may develop nuclear capabilities as well.

Europe + China. The Chinese communist regime is authoritarian. It does not adhere to the rule of law in any meaningful way. But while it is ambitious, it is stable, and it understands that stability is its biggest advantage. China does not threaten Europe as acutely as Russia and the United States do, and Europe needs some stability undergirding the next world order. Europe will draw closer to China and supplant the United States as China’s main trading partner.

Ukraine will join Europe. As Europe rearms it will need Ukraine’s defense industrial base; therefore it will draw Ukraine into its collective security arrangement (the EU’s, not NATO’s) once the Russo-Ukraine war draws to a close.

Greenland will become disputed territory. Greenland is about to become, like Crimea or Kashmir or the little islands in the South China Sea, disputed territory. The Republican party has made an unmistakable, irrevocable territorial claim on Greenland. There are only two possible ways to resolve this question.

There is much more at the link and I urge you to click over if you have a sub or get one if you have the means. I think many of the former conservatives are the most clear-eyed about what Trump is doing to us on the world stage right now and their alarm is palpable.

Also read this one (gift link) from Robert Kagan in the Atlantic. An excerpt:

Americans are entering the most dangerous world they have known since World War II, one that will make the Cold War look like child’s play and the post–Cold War world like paradise. In fact, this new world will look a lot like the world prior to 1945, with multiple great powers and metastasizing competition and conflict. The U.S. will have no reliable friends or allies and will have to depend entirely on its own strength to survive and prosper. This will require more military spending, not less, because the open access to overseas resources, markets, and strategic bases that Americans have enjoyed will no longer come as a benefit of the country’s alliances. Instead, they will have to be contested and defended against other great powers.

None of this had to happen. People didn’t like the old man and the Black lady and the price of eggs was just too high. They ignored everything else he and his henchmen were saying. It’s was all there — Trump addled mind, his unquenchable thirst for vengeance and monuments to himself, the utter depravity of his Project 2025 and GOP leaders’ craven cowardice were all on display. Why would anyone think that the man who could not accept his loss in 2020 and incited an insurrection to overturn it would be anything but a tyrant?

The Tariff King

actual quote

The Wall St. Journal reports what we already knew:

Americans, not foreigners, are bearing almost the entire cost of U.S. tariffs, according to new research that contradicts a key claim by President Trump and suggests he might have a weaker hand in a reemerging trade war with Europe.

Trump has repeatedly claimed that his historic tariffs, deployed aggressively over the past year as both a revenue-raising and foreign-policy tool, will be paid for by foreigners. Such assertions helped to reinforce the president’s bargaining power and encourage foreign governments to do deals with the U.S.

[…]

The new research, published Monday by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a well-regarded German think tank, suggests that the impact of tariffs is likely to show up over time in the form of higher U.S. consumer prices.

The findings don’t mean that the tariffs are a win for Europe—on the contrary. German exports to the U.S., which have rocketed in recent years, have contracted sharply in the past year.

The German research echoes recent reports by the Budget Lab at Yale and economists at Harvard Business School, finding that only a small fraction of the tariff costs were being borne by foreign producers.

We knew all that but I guess it has to be proven once again.

Trump is whining about having to pay the tariffs back to the US importers and manufacturers if the Supremes rule against his scheme. (It’s his mad money that he likes to use to buy whatever toys and people he wants to play with.) And, frankly, his henchmen already have other plans in place to use other authorities to continue to act like barbarians around the world dictating other countries’ policies with tariffs. So that may end up being meaningless.

But the ramifications of his batshit crazy behavior with threats of trade wars (and shooting wars) are going to bite in a big way. We may have seen that already today with the reaction of the markets and all kinds of investors from currency to bonds to long term interest rates. Perhaps they’ll all bounce back if Trump tacos again, but I have to wonder if it isn’t finally sinking in (especially after the Venezuela and Greenland nonsense) that three more years of this lunacy is intolerable. The party is being ruined by a big, orange bully who insists on beating he shit out of everything just because he can.

Unfunny Comedian

This is the supposed “comedy” that people love about this lunatic and I will never understand it:

Trump: "Whoo. I'm glad my finger wasn't in that sucker. That could've dome some damage but you know what? I wouldn't have shown the pain. I would've gone back. Boy did you hear that? That was nasty. But I would not have shown the pain. I would've acted like nothing happens as my finger fell off."

Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-01-20T19:06:00.347Z

It used to be that anyone who bragged, whined and lied as much as this person would be shunned by society and a disgusting boor. Now the whole government talks like this. And apparently millions of people still can’t get enough of it.

What is the next generation of Americans going to be like if this is how our leaders speak?

Lie Back And Enjoy It

I think this gentleman speaks for Europe:

Even the European right wing is rejecting this bullshit:

Jordan Bardella, leader of France’s far-right party National Rally:

The United States is presenting us with a choice: accept dependency disguised as partnership, or act as sovereign powers capable of defending our interests. When a U.S. president threatens a European territory while using trade pressure, it is not dialogue—it is coercion. And our credibility is at stake. Greenland has become a strategic pivot in a world returning to imperial logic.

Yielding today would set a dangerous precedent, exposing other European—and even French overseas—territories tomorrow. The European Union cannot remain silent. The agreement negotiated last summer must be suspended. Our anti-coercion instruments must be activated, and targeted measures adopted. This is not escalation—it is self-defense. The choice is simple: submission or sovereignty. Europe must choose freedom, responsibility, and control of its own destiny.

Meanwhile, back in the states:

Not that he cares. Everything has always turned out well for him, he’s never been richer or more powerful and he believes that no one can stop him because no one ever has. Public opinion is no longer relevant.

His GOP allies may have some problems but I’m not sure they’re very worried either. They figure Trump will just do whatever’s necessary to ensure they stay in power and they’ve come to believe that Trump is magic/omnipotent so there’s no margin in trying to do it without him.

Read this NY Times article (gift link) about what has to happen, and soon, from Masha Gessen, a Russian emigre who knows what they’re talking about. We don’t have much time.

Good Morning!

How’s everyone feeling today?

President Trump’s intensifying standoff with European leaders over the fate of Greenland prompted a sharp response from investors Tuesday morning, with the value of U.S. stocks, dollar and government bonds all falling.

The S&P 500 dropped over 1 percent as investors reacted to Mr. Trump’s increasing threat of higher tariffs on European allies unless they supported his plans for America to take control of Greenland.

Tuesday morning’s decline was the first time the index has started the day that much lower since April amid turmoil from Mr. Trump’s initial sweeping tariff threats on nearly all of America’s trading partners.

Often when stocks are roiled by geopolitical upheaval, investors flock to the safety of other U.S. assets, like the dollar or government bonds. But in a sign that investors were embracing a “sell America” trade and moving away from U.S. assets altogether, both the dollar and U.S. government debt lost value Tuesday morning.

The dollar index, which pits the currency against a basket of currencies that represent America’s major trading partners, fell 0.8 percent. The dollar weakened against every currency from the group of 10 nations, which includes the euro, British pound and Norwegian Krone.

The yield, which moves inversely to price, on the 10-year U.S. government note rose, meaning its value declined. This yield acts as one of the most important interest rates in the world by underpinning interest rates across consumer and corporate debt. The 10-year yield rose 0.1 percentage points, to 4.3 percent, its sharpest move higher so far this year, undermining the administration’s efforts to move interest rates lower.

Tuesday morning’s trading was the first chance U.S. markets had to react to Mr. Trump’s escalating threats toward Europe over the weekend with the U.S. stock market closed on Monday in honor of Martin Luther King’s Birthday.

One bright spot in the stock market came from the rising value of defense stocks. Northrop Grumman, an aerospace and defense company, nudged higher Tuesday morning, pushing further into record territory having risen almost 20 percent already this month.

Great. The markets are betting on war.

And Europe has some tricks of its own up its sleeve:

Trump’s request to purchase land under the jurisdiction of another nation has not gone down well with the Western world. While the U.S. may be the biggest economy on the planet, patience is wearing thin among its allies, after a year of barbed back-and-forths over tariffs and military spending.

This weekend’s power flex may be a stretch too far, economists are now warning, and Trump’s weakness may prove to be America’s voracious spending habits.

Deutsche Bank’s Jim Reid highlighted that Liberation Day tariffs in April were stepped back a week later, after U.S. Treasury yields saw a “scary” session as investors retreated to safety, away from American borrowing.

“Financial markets may play a big part in how this situation resolves itself,” Reid wrote in a note to clients this morning. “The main Achilles Heel of the U.S. is the huge twin deficits. So while in many ways it feels like the U.S. holds the economic cards, it doesn’t hold all the funding cards in a world that will be very disturbed by the weekend’s events.”

Investors, analysts, and world leaders have long wondered when—or if—a debt crisis would occur in one of the nations burdened by a massive deficit. While the likes of Japan, the U.K., and France are by no means balancing their books, America’s $38 trillion deficit dwarfs its counterparts. While a great deal of that debt is held by the public (including the Fed, where President Trump is also in hot water), vast sums are also owned by foreign governments and overseas investors.

This exposure—to the tune of $8 trillion—ING pointed out, may be something European leaders decide to remind the White House of. Europe being America’s largest lender “illustrates the deep interdependence between the U.S. and Europe but also shows that, at least theoretically, Europe also has leverage on the U.S.,” wrote Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro, and Bert Colijn, chief economist for the Netherlands. The duo added: “Whether in practice, Europe would really engage in a ‘Sell America Inc’ season is a completely different question. There is very little the EU could do to force European private sector investors to sell USD assets; it could only try to incentivise investments in EUR assets.”

The EU also has a weapon in its arsenal that it has yet to deploy. French President Emmanuel Macron has suggested now is the time to use the E.U.’s Anti-Coercion Instrument (ACI). The tool is a set of countermeasures against any foreign powers that unduly interfere in the policy choices of the E.U. or its member states, by restricting U.S. companies from accessing the European market, banning them from bidding for government work, restricting trade, and curtailing foreign investment.

The E.U. could also impose new tariffs on about $100 billion of its imports from the U.S.

This, Goldman Sachs believes, is likely to be one of the reactions European leaders are now weighing. Analysts Sven Jari Stehn and Giovanni Pierdomenico wrote this weekend that the legislation had been designed precisely for situations like this—though perhaps not with a strong ally like the U.S. in mind.

The duo wrote: “Starting the activation does not mean implementation (which requires several steps) but signals potential E.U. action and allows time for negotiation. The ACI could involve a range of policy tools broader than tariffs, such as investment restrictions, taxation of U.S. assets and services.” On services, the E.U. conveniently holds a surplus over the U.S., meaning it would inflict greater harm in this particular industry compared to similar action from across the Atlantic.

A little warning here too:

Billionaire investor Ray Dalio warned Tuesday that President Donald Trump’s aggressive political direction could spark a new phase of global financial conflict, as foreign governments and investors reconsider their appetite for U.S. assets amid rising unease and economic tensions

“On the other side of trade deficits and trade wars, there are capital and capital wars,” Dalio told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. “If you take the conflicts, you can’t ignore the possibility of the capital wars. In other words, maybe there’s not the same inclination to buy at U.S. debt and so on.”

The founder of Bridgewater Associates, one of the world’s largest hedge funds, is concerned that countries holding large amounts of U.S. dollars and Treasurys may become less willing to finance U.S. deficits if trust erodes. At the same time, the U.S. continues to issue large volumes of debt, creating a problematic situation if confidence weakens on either side, Dalio said.

“We know that both the holders of U.S. dollars are denominated … and those who need it, the United States, are worried about each other. Right? So if you have other countries who are holding it, and they’re worried about each other, and we’re producing a lot of it, that’s a big issue,” he said.

Treasury prices tumbled Tuesday as investors weighed renewed tariff threats from Washington that revived fears of a trade war with Europe and spurred a flight away from U.S. assets. The president has intensified his rhetoric on Greenland, threatening to impose new tariffs on countries opposing the sale of the Danish territory to the United States.

Dalio said history offers multiple examples of similar episodes in which economic conflict escalated beyond trade into capital flows and currency disputes. “When you have conflicts, international geopolitical conflicts, even allies do not want to hold each other’s debt. They prefer to go to a hard currency. This is logical and it’s factual, and it’s repeated throughout the world history,” he said.

Here’s Mark Carney in Davos:

“I will talk today about the breaking of the world order, the end of a pleasant fiction and the beginning of a brutal reality where the geopolitics of the great powers is not subject to any constraint,” said Mr. Carney, who used a mixture of French and English in his address in Davos, Switzerland.

“Every day we are reminded that we live in an era of great power rivalry,” he said. “That the rules-based order is fading. That the strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must.”

He added, “Let me be direct: We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition.”

Mr. Carney, who received a standing ovation, spoke not long after Mr. Trump posted an A.I. image on social media that included a map of American flags superimposed over both Canada and the United States.

Jesus.

In his speech on Tuesday, Mr. Carney said that Canada’s commitment to an article in the NATO treaty that views an attack on any member as an attack on all members was “unwavering.” That article was not written with the consideration that one member would be attacking another. It is also not clear that all NATO members would respond militarily to an attack on another member.

Canada and the United States have a joint command for North American air defense. This week aircraft from both countries are at an American air base in Greenland as part of a regular training exercise that the joint air command said had been approved by Denmark.

In his speech Mr. Carney called on medium-size countries like Canada to band together to offset the power of the United States, China and Russia.

“The middle powers must act together because if you are not at the table, we’re are on the menu,” he said. “Great powers can afford now to go it alone.”

We’re all on the menu.

Have a nice day!

Carefully Taught

Trumpism will survive Trump

A quote from a Canadian journalist is floating around the net, sometimes paraphrased. It’s best to get the real thing. It’s by David Cochrane, host of CBC News Network’s daily “Power & Politics.”

“America isn’t the way it is because [Trump is] president. He’s president because America is the way it is.”

Three Catholic cardinals don’t address the way America is directly, but:

Three U.S. Catholic cardinals are urging the Trump administration to use a moral compass, saying U.S. military action in Venezuela, threats of acquiring Greenland and cuts in foreign aid risk bringing vast suffering instead of promoting peace.

Cardinals Blase Cupich of Chicago, Robert McElroy of Washington and Joseph Tobin of Newark, N.J., warned that without a moral vision, the current debate over Washington’s foreign policy was mired in “polarization, partisanship, and narrow economic and social interests.”

“Most of the United States and the world are adrift morally in terms of foreign policy,” McElroy told The Associated Press. “I still believe the United States has a tremendous impact upon the world.”

The statement is ironic insofar as it concerns Donald Trump, an emotionally damaged man who asks forgiveness for nothing. Miraculously, he did not turn to stone after telling The New York Times this month that the only check on his power, his only moral compass, is his own morality. In fact, he has none. Cruelty is his compass. Especially against non-white, non-Europeans. They all have targets on their backs in Trump’s second administration.

The U.S. conference of Catholic bishops in November issued a “special message” condemning the administration’s profiling and targeting of immigrants in the name of border enforcement:

We are concerned about the conditions in detention centers and the lack of access to pastoral care. We lament that some immigrants in the United States have arbitrarily lost their legal status. We are troubled by threats against the sanctity of houses of worship and the special nature of hospitals and schools. We are grieved when we meet parents who fear being detained when taking their children to school and when we try to console family members who have already been separated from their loved ones. 

Cupich’s moral compass is shaped by his experiences growing up in Nebraska and serving for a decade as cardinal in Chicago. He told MS Now’s Rachel Maddow Monday night that Chicago is “the immigrant city.” The church celebrates mass there “in 26 different langauges.”

The target of the cardinals’ plea, Donald Trump, grew up in an affluent neighborhgood in Queens, fathered by a man known (and prosecuted) for his own prejudices.

America is the way it is because so many of us, like Trump, were carefully taught to hate all the people our relatives hate. Thus, Trumpism will likely survive Trump, Cochrane concludes.

One wonders if the United States will.