Skip to content

Month: February 2026

A dozen roses: 12 romantic comedies for Valentine’s Day

Apropos to Valentine’s Day, I thought that I would share my 12 favorite romantic comedies with you. In non-ranking alphabetical order:

https://learnlangblog.files.wordpress.com/2020/06/20200701_amelie.jpg

Amelie-I know this one has its share of detractors-but writer-director Jean-Pierre Juenet’s beautifully realized film (co-written with Gillaume Laurant) has stolen my heart for life. Audrey Tautou literally lights up the screen as a gregarious loner who decides to become a guardian angel (sometimes benign devil) and commit random acts of anonymous kindness. The plight of Amelie’s people in need is suspiciously like her own…those who need a little push to come out of self-imposed exiles and revel in life’s simple pleasures. Of course, our heroine is really in search of her own happiness and fulfillment. Does she find it? You will have to see for yourself. Whimsical, inventive, life-affirming, and wholly original, Amelie should melt the most cynical of hearts (if it fails to do so…I beg you to get some therapy).

https://filmforum.org/do-not-enter-or-modify-or-erase/client-uploads/gregorys-girl-slide-1.jpg

Gregory’s Girl– Scottish writer-director Bill Forsyth’s delightful examination of first love follows gawky teenager Gregory (John Gordon Sinclair) as he goes gaga over Dorothy (Dee Hepburn), a fellow soccer player on the school team. Gregory receives advice from an unlikely mentor, his little sister (Allison Forster). While his male classmates put on airs about having deep insights about the opposite sex, they are just as clueless as he.

Forsyth gets a lot of mileage out of a basic truth about adolescence-the girls are usually light years ahead of the boys in getting a handle on the mysteries of love. Not as precious as you might think, as Forsyth is a master of low-key anarchy and understated irony. You may have trouble navigating those Scottish accents, but it’s worth the effort. Also with Clare Grogan, whom music fans may recall as the lead singer of 80s new wavers Altered Images, and Red Dwarf fans may recognize as “Kristine Kochanski”.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-VU6gFbqOIuo/V3-uocS7vYI/AAAAAAAAILo/ANv2GytPoIogKjMkB7FVomntq1AKvg0LACLcB/s1600/960.jpg

Modern Romance (1981) – In his best romantic comedy (co-written by frequent collaborator Monica Johnson), writer-director Albert Brooks (the inventor of “cringe” comedy) casts himself as a film editor who works for American International Pictures. His obsessive-compulsiveness makes him great at his job, but a pain-in-the-ass to his devoted girlfriend (Kathryn Harrold), who is becoming exasperated with his penchant to impulsively break up with her one day, then beg her to take him back the next.

There are many inspired scenes, particularly a sequence where a depressed Brooks takes Quaaludes and drunk dials every woman he’s ever dated (like Bob Newhart, Brooks is a master of “the phone bit”). Another great scene features Brooks and his assistant editor (the late Bruno Kirby, in one of his best roles) laying down Foley tracks in the post-production sessions for a cheesy sci-fi movie. Brooks’ brother, the late Bob Einstein (a regular on Curb Your Enthusiasm) has a wry cameo as a sportswear clerk. Also with George Kennedy (as “himself”) and real-life film director James L. Brooks (no relation) playing Brooks’ boss.

Next Stop, Wonderland – Writer/director Brad Anderson’s intelligent and easygoing fable about love and serendipity made me a Hope Davis fan for life. Davis plays a laid back Bostonian who finds her love life set adrift after her pompous environmental activist boyfriend (Philip Seymour Hoffman) suddenly decides that dashing off to save the earth is more important than sustaining their relationship.

Her story is paralleled with that of a charming and unassuming single fellow (Alan Gelfant) who aspires to become a marine biologist. Both parties find themselves politely deferring to well-meaning friends and relatives who are constantly trying to fix them up with dates. I don’t think it’s a spoiler to tell you that these two may be destined to end up together. The film seems to have been inspired by A Man and a Woman, right down to its breezy bossa nova/samba soundtrack.

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/b8/a2/9d/b8a29d4b04c7af90380aae06775e6bc8.jpg

Play it Again, Sam – I don’t know what it is about this particular Woody Allen vehicle (directed by Herbert Ross), but no matter how many times I have viewed it over the years, I laugh just as hard at all the one-liners as I did the first time I saw it. Annie Hall and Manhattan may be his most highly lauded and artistically accomplished projects, but for pure “laughs per minute”, I would nominate this 1972 entry, with a screenplay adapted by Allen from his own original stage version.

Allen portrays a film buff with a Humphrey Bogart obsession. He fantasizes that he’s getting pointers from Bogie’s ghost (played to perfection by Jerry Lacy) who advises him on how to “be a man” and attract the perfect mate. He receives some more pragmatic assistance from his best friends, a married couple (Diane Keaton and Tony Roberts) who fix him up with a series of women (the depictions of the various dating disasters are hilarious beyond description). A classic.

https://variety.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/shesgottahaveit.jpg?w=1000

She’s Gotta Have It – “Please baby please baby please baby please!” One of writer-director Spike Lee’s earlier, funny films (his debut, actually). A sexy, hip, and fiercely independent young woman (Tracy Camilla Johns) juggles relationships with three men, who are all quite aware of each other’s existence.

Lee steals his own film by casting himself as the goofiest and most memorable of the three suitors- “Mars”, a trash-talking version of the classic Woody Allen nebbish. Lee milks laughs from the huffing and puffing by the competing paramours, as each jockeys for the alpha position (and makes some keen observations regarding sexist machismo and male vanity). Spike’s dad Bill Lee composed a lovely jazz-pop score. A milestone for modern indie cinema.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/S/sgp-catalog-images/region_US/newvideo-NNVG1629-Full-Image_GalleryBackground-en-US-1552461860562._SX1080_.jpg

Sherman’s March – Documentary filmmaker Ross McElwee is truly one of America’s hidden treasures. A genteel Southern neurotic (Woody Allen meets Tennessee Williams), McElwee has been documenting his personal life since the mid 70’s and managed to turn all that footage into some of the funniest and most thought-provoking films that most people have never seen. Viewers weaned on reality TV and Snapchat may wonder “what’s the big deal about one more schmuck making glorified home movies?” but they would be missing an enriching glimpse into the human condition.

Sherman’s March actually began as a history piece, a project aiming to retrace the Union general’s path of destruction through the South during the Civil War, but somehow ended up as rumination on the eternal human quest for love and acceptance, filtered through McElwee’s personal search for the perfect mate. Despite its daunting 3 hour length, I’ve found myself returning to this film for repeat viewings over the years, and enjoying it just as much as the first time I saw it. The unofficial “sequel”, Time Indefinite, is worth a peek as well.

https://filmcentric.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/sommarnattens-leende-1955.jpeg

Smiles of a Summer Night– “Lighthearted romp” and “Ingmar Bergman” are not usually mentioned in the same breath, but it applies to this wise, drolly amusing morality tale from the director whose name is synonymous with somber dramas.

Gunnar Bjornstrand heads a fine ensemble, as an amorous middle-aged attorney with a young wife (whose “virtue” remains intact) and a free-spirited mistress, who juggles a few lovers herself. Love in all its guises is represented by a bevy of richly drawn characters, who converge in a third act set on a sultry summer’s eve at a country estate (the inspiration for Bergman admirer Woody Allen’s A Midsummer Night’s Sex Comedy).

Fast-paced, literate, and sensuous, Smiles of a Summer Night has a muted cry here and a whisper there of that patented Bergman “darkness”, but compared to most of his oeuvre, this one is a veritable screwball comedy. Gorgeously photographed by Gunnar Fischer (he was also cinematographer for Bergman’s classics Wild Strawberries and The Seventh Seal).

The Tall Guy –Deftly directed by British TV comic Mel Smith with a high-brow/low-brow blend of sophisticated cleverness and riotous vulgarity (somehow he makes it work), this is the stuff cult followings are made of.

Jeff Goldblum is an American actor working on the London stage, who is love struck by an English nurse (Emma Thompson). Rowan Atkinson is a hoot as Goldblum’s employer, a London stage comic beloved by his audience but an absolute backstage terror to cast and crew. The most hilariously choreographed sex scene ever put on film alone is worth the price of admission; and the extended set-piece, a staged musical version of The Elephant Man (a brilliant takeoff on Andrew Lloyd Webber) had me on the floor. An underrated gem.

https://criterion-production.s3.amazonaws.com/carousel-files/920f1c558de44d2795cfbecb474f8284.jpeg

Tampopo – Self billed as “The first Japanese noodle western”, this 1987 entry from writer-director Juzo Itami is all that and more. Nobuko Niyamoto is superb as the eponymous character, a widow who has inherited her late husband’s noodle house. Despite her dedication and effort to please customers, Tampopo struggles to keep the business afloat, until a deux ex machina arrives-a truck driver named Goro (Tsutomo Yamazaki).

After one taste, Goro pinpoints the problem-bland noodles. No worries-like the magnanimous stranger who blows into an old western town (think Alan Ladd in Shane). Goro takes Tampopo on as a personal project, mentoring her on the Zen of creating the perfect noodle bowl. A delight from start to finish, offering keen insight on the relationship between food, sex and love.

https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-g8p86tj2cB0/Ul7x_5_obgI/AAAAAAAALa0/ktj4bcFBxBs/s1600/A+Touch+of+Class_Segal_Jackson_1973.JPG

A Touch of Class  – Directed by Melvin Frank (The Court Jester, A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum) this 1973 film was co-written by the director with Jack Rose and Marvin Frank. George Segal and Glenda Jackson make a great comedy tag team as a married American businessman and British divorcee (respectively) who, following two chance encounters in London, quickly realize there’s a mutual attraction and embark on an affair.

The story falters a bit in the third act, when it begins to vacillate a little clumsily between comedy and morality tale, but when it’s funny, it’s very funny. The best part of the film concerns the clandestine lovers’ first romantic getaway on a trip to Spain. Segal has always shown a genius for screen comedy, but I think Jackson steals the film (and gets off some of the best zingers, with her impeccably droll “English-ness”).

https://a.ltrbxd.com/resized/sm/upload/ba/lp/w6/k3/twofortheroad-1200-1200-675-675-crop-000000.jpg?k=8e2376e3d7

Two for the Road – A swinging 60s version of Scenes from a Marriage. Director Stanley Donen (Singin’ in the Rain) whips up a cinematic soufflé; folding in a sophisticated script by Frederick Raphael, a generous helping of Albert Finney and Audrey Hepburn, a dash of colorful European locales, and topping it with a cherry of a score by Henry Mancini.

Donen follows the travails of a married couple over the years of their relationship, by constructing a series of non-linear flashbacks and flash-forwards (a structural device that has been utilized since by other filmmakers, but rarely as effectively). While there are a lot of laughs, Two For the Road is, at its heart, a thoughtful meditation on the nature of love and true, lasting commitment. Finney and Hepburn have an electric on-screen chemistry.

Previous posts with related themes:

Delicatessen

All Night Long

A Little Romance

Harold and Maude

Whatever Works & The (500) Days of Summer

Vicky Cristina Barcelona

Midnight in Paris

A Faithful Man

10 romantic sleepers of the last decade (2011-2019)

Paper ring: The 10 worst date flicks for Valentine’s Day

More reviews at Den of Cinema

Dennis Hartley

They Won’t Take No For An Answer

Thousands of immigrants (not counting all the citizens) are being unlawfully detained and the administration simply continues despite judges all over the country telling them to stop. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is apparently snoozing through the fascist takeover.

Hundreds of judges across the nation have ruled over 4,400 times that President Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement arm is detaining people unlawfully, according to a new Reuters review of court documents. And that’s just since October. 

The Trump administration’s immense increase in detainments rests, in part, on their decision to detain people while their immigration cases are moving through the system—a departure from previous administrations’ interpretation of immigration law. This has led to a steep increase in immigrants petitioning the courts to be released, as Reuters reports, and the thousands of rulings finding that these prolonged detainments were unlawful. 

Tricia McLaughlin, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson, told Reuters that the increase in lawsuits came as “no surprise” because “many activist judges have attempted to thwart President Trump from fulfilling the American people’s mandate for mass deportations.” But not all of the judges challenging the Trump administration’s mass deportation mechanism were appointed by Democrats. 

It’s always rigged when it goes against them. The greateest whiners in world history.

Paging Stephen Miller

Guess what? Your ethnic cleansing plan is killing your own allies:

Construction executives have held multiple meetings over the last month with the White House and Congress to discuss how immigration busts on job sites and in communities are scaring away employees, making it more expensive to build homes in a market desperate for new supply. Beyond the affordability issue, the executives made an electability argument, raising concerns to GOP leaders that support among Hispanic voters is eroding, particularly in regions that swung to Trump in 2024.

[…]

“I told [lawmakers] straight up: South Texas will never be red again,” said Mario Guerrero, the CEO of the South Texas Builders Association, a Trump voter who traveled to Washington last week. He urged the administration and lawmakers to ease up on enforcement at construction sites, warning that employees are afraid to go to work.

The construction industry is one of the latest and clearest examples of how the president’s mass deportation agenda continues to clash with his economic goals of bringing down prices and political aims of keeping control of Congress. Even the president’s allies fear disruptions to labor-heavy industries will undermine the gains with Latino voters Republicans have made in recent years, in large part because of Trump’s economic agenda.

These concerns were the central focus of a White House meeting this week between chief of staff Susie Wiles, Speaker Mike Johnson, and a group of Republican lawmakers, according to three people with knowledge of the meeting, granted anonymity to discuss it. The group talked about growing concerns that Hispanic voters are abandoning the Republican Party in droves, as well as the policies driving these losses — immigration and affordability concerns.

I guess nobody mentioned the economic effects of Miller’s draconian deportation plans. And Trump is too distracted by his hideous ballroom and quest for the Nobel Peace Prize to care. (Not to mention he’s too dumb and addled to think beyond the last phone call he got from some bootlicker.)

They may very well begin to ease up on the industries that Trump values like farming and building. It is the Democrats job to keep this albatross tied around their necks and then set it a fire for the next three years. They must be relentless in their condemnation with endless visual reminders of what these people have done to the immigrant population in this country, whether they pull back from their most extreme policies or not.

Never forget. This is the ugliest policy the U.S. government has undertaken since Jim Crow and the Republican Party cannot be allowed to run from what they’ve done.

A Disaster Waiting To Happen

The wildest story you will read this week and that’s saying something. I know you’ve probably heard about the Pentagon shooting down a party balloon with an experimental drone laser weapon which caused the FAA to shut down the El Paso airport last week. It’s way crazier than we knew (gift link) and I can’t believe it isn’t a bigger story.

Last spring, in the early months of Steve Feinberg’s tenure as deputy defense secretary, Pentagon staff members briefed him on plans to employ new high-energy laser weapons to take out drones being used by Mexican cartels to smuggle drugs across the southern U.S. border.

But their use was conditioned on getting a green light from aviation safety officials.

[…]

Now the question of whether the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security followed proper procedures and the law in deploying the laser weapon has become a flashpoint within the Trump administration. Working alongside military personnel, agents from Customs and Border Protection, which is part of the Homeland Security Department, used the weapon this week not far from El Paso International Airport, prompting fury inside the F.A.A. and a brief shutdown of the airport and airspace in that region.

Late Tuesday night, the F.A.A. administrator, Bryan Bedford, caught off guard that the system was being used without authorization and concerned for public safety, believed he had little choice but to close the airspace for 10 days, according to more than a half-dozen people. It was an extraordinary decision that surprised the flying public and local officials.

Under pressure from the White House, Mr. Bedford rescinded the order on Wednesday, setting off a bout of finger-pointing within the administration that continued throughout the week. Administration officials told reporters that the F.A.A. did not warn the White House or the Pentagon that it was about to severely limit flights over a city of nearly 700,000 residents.

But internal government communications reviewed by The New York Times tell a very different story. In one email, dated Feb. 6, the F.A.A.’s top lawyer warned a Pentagon official that deploying the laser system without restricting flights created “a grave risk of fatalities or permanent injuries” to Americans traveling through that airspace.

[…]

White House officials declined to comment on Friday, and referred to a social media post from Mr. Duffy, published on Wednesday, that said the administration “acted swiftly to address a cartel drone incursion.”

But that narrative was disputed by multiple people familiar with the situation who said the border protection unit ended up shooting down a party balloon, rather than a drone. Military service members were present during the incident, the people said.

And yes, this was a Hegseth AND a Noem special. Both the Pentagon and CBP were involved. God help us:

Then in the dark morning hours of Feb. 9, members of a C.B.P. tactical unit, who had been trained how to use the counter-drone lasers by the Army, decided to deploy one, while members of the military looked on. They aimed the laser at what they thought was a drone flying near the Army’s Fort Bliss, though it turned out to be a metallic balloon.

It was the first known domestic use of the weapon by federal officials outside of a controlled environment, according to two people with knowledge of the technology, and it was done without the F.A.A.’s approval, in a possible violation of the law

Read the whole thing. You won’t believe it. We have clowns, jokers and Buck Turgidsons in charge of aviation safety and the military and more innocent people are going to be killed before this is all over.

We’re always talking about Trump having “the nuclear codes” as if it’s some kind of remote possibility, or even a joke, that something could happen. But these people really are nuts and I genuinely think anything could happen.

L’il Marco puts a little band-aid on the rupture

There was a whole lot of “blood and soil” bullshit in that speech that most people are just glossing over. Not Tom mention the fact that, mlike Trump, he is determined to kill massive numbers of people by ignoring climate change. (Of course he already did that with the destruction of USAID, which he gleefully carried out at Elon’s direction.)

I thought this analysis was spot on:

A change of tone. Rubio brought a lot of white paint to Munich to cover the cracks caused by the great rupture. From the Beatles and Michelangelo to German beer and the common victory in the Cold War, he invoked all the symbols of culture that are meant to unite us into a single Western civilisation. Europe and the US are connected. That much was clear.

But what about the values that once held the transatlantic community together? According to Marco Rubio, international law is no longer working. That was supposed to be holding us together. Other fundamental principles – like democracy or true freedom of speech were simply not mentioned.

So is it now clear that this is all about interests, not common values. And do we actually have common interests? I am not sure that Europeans see the announced civilisational decline, supposedly caused mainly by migration and deindustrialisation, as a core uniting interest. For most Europeans, the common interest is security. And according to the Secretary, Europe has to defend itself on its own, otherwise NATO looks weak.

This was not a departure from the general position of the US administration. It was simply delivered in more polite terms. I am not sure the white paint will hold.

There’s also the fact that any country that would elect Donald Trump a second time after everything he did the first time simply cannot be trusted. Something is so haywire in American society that it’s terrifying that we have the money and military might that we have. The rest of the world would be idiotic not to look elsewhere for security.

I mean, come on…

Stephen Miller’s Theory of Power

Their iron law of force

“[W]e live in a world, in the real world … that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power. These are the iron laws of the world that have existed since the beginning of time.”Stephen Miller

He’s a Nazi. Prove me wrong, the late Charlie Kirk might say.

Marcy Wheeler put up a long post on Friday that you really ought to read on Stephen Miller’s theory of power. And about steps taken by AG Pam Bondi, Harmeet Dhillon, and Kash Patel in attempting “their own version of subjugation” in Minnesota. In the process of kidnapping people from their homes, abusing the citizens of the Twin Cities, and repeatedly violating half a dozen constitutional amendments, the Department of Justice has had to drop cases against drug traffickers for lack of prosecutors to manage the caseload. Nearly everyone with a conscience and commitment to the rule of law rather than the rule of Trump has left the department.

In making false statement after false statement about cases they’ve charged, and in violating court order after court order, Trump’s DOJ has gutted its own credibility and the government’s presumption of regularity with the courts.

Wheeler writes that Chief Judge Patrick Schiltz listed 96 orders ICE had blown off, and demanded that ICE start following the law:

This list should give pause to anyone—no matter his or her political beliefs—who cares about the rule of law.  ICE has likely violated more court orders in January 2026 than some federal agencies have violated in their entire existence.  The Court warns ICE that future noncompliance with court orders may result in future show‐cause orders requiring the personal appearances of Lyons or other government officials.  ICE is not a law unto itself.  ICE has every right to challenge the orders of this Court, but, like any litigant, ICE must follow those orders unless and until they are overturned or vacated.

Except becoming a law unto itself is the entire Trump administration’s raison d’etre. It is no accident that Miller’s beliefs echo Hitler’s. Back in Cold War days, right wingers might have called them fellow travelers.

Marcy brings receipts, as she does, as well as this summary:

Homeland Security Czar Stephen Miller’s attempt to impose his power in Minnesota, the same guy murderboating fishermen who might be carrying cocaine in the Caribbean in the name of halting fentanyl trafficking — has led to the collapse of drug trafficking cases because his attempt to subdue Minnesota by force has instead destroyed the Federal tools to impose order by law.

And now the one case Pam Bondi has prioritized over those drug trafficking cases, the Don Lemon case, threatens to become an indictment of Harmeet Dhillon’s misconduct in pursuing the indictment, her platforming of racist AI slop and gambling discussions before, then potentially misleading a grand jury so as to get her trophy in the form of one of Donald Trump’s Black adversaries.

None of this is good. None of it mitigates the damage Stephen Miller willfully did to Minnesota.

Minnesota lost and  Stephen Miller lost. Everybody loses under Miller’s barbaric theory of power.

It’s our job to outwit, outplay, and outlast the barbarians inside the gate. Minnesota showed the way.

Guess Who’s Watching?

Where’s the dog, Kristi?

It’s not fascism. No. It’s simply Donald Trump’s bootlicks paying attention to this matter. And to that matter. And the other matter. And especially to your matter (The New York Times):

The Department of Homeland Security is expanding its efforts to identify Americans who oppose Immigration and Customs Enforcement by sending tech companies legal requests for the names, email addresses, telephone numbers and other identifying data behind social media accounts that track or criticize the agency.

Sources tell the Times that Team Dogslayer is hitting major social media companies (but not X) with hundreds of administrative subpoenas. DHS is asking for identifying details about anonymous accounts that track and criticize ICE. Google, Meta and Reddit have complied with some requests per four government officials and tech employees. The Times has seen two sent to Meta in the last six months.

Taking more liberties

The tech companies, which can choose whether or not to provide the information, have said they review government requests before complying. Some of the companies notified the people whom the government had requested data on and gave them 10 to 14 days to fight the subpoena in court.

“The government is taking more liberties than they used to,” said Steve Loney, a senior supervising attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania. “It’s a whole other level of frequency and lack of accountability.” Over the last six months, Mr. Loney has represented people whose social media account information was sought by the Department of Homeland Security.

A little double entendre there with “taking more liberties.” (No mention of WordPress or our hosting service, so I guess we’re safe here. For now.)

The department said it had “broad administrative subpoena authority” but did not address questions about its requests. In court, its lawyers have argued that they are seeking information to help keep ICE agents in the field safe.

ICE agents in the field simply open fire.

The Trump administration has aggressively tried tamping down criticism of ICE, partly by identifying Americans who have demonstrated against the agency. ICE agents told protesters in Minneapolis and Chicago that they were being recorded and identified with facial recognition technology. Last month, Tom Homan, the White House border czar, also said on Fox News that he was pushing to “create a database” of people who were “arrested for interference, impeding and assault.”

Now sounds like a good time to invest in anti facial recognition makeup. But then again, no.

Friday Night Soother

Some good news for a change:

It is a very sad thing to realise that a species is no more, that the last member of its kind has now gone. Once a species has become extinct there is no bringing it back. However, sometimes, just sometimes, they can surprise us.

There are a number of species that were once thought to be long gone that have popped up again to astonish us, revealing that they were never really gone at all.

Attenborough’s long-beaked echidna:

This curious little mammal is one of only three species in its genus. Like all echidnas (of which there are not many), long-beaked echidnas are monotremes and lay eggs. In fact, aside from platypus’ they are the only mammals on earth to do so. And that’s not the only strange thing about them.

They are also covered in protective keratinous spines and have a long protuberant snout with which they forage for insects. Although all echidnas are rare, this particular species has proved more elusive than most.

It was first described and collected in 1961 and had not been seen since, leading many to think it had died out. Until last year that is… In November 2023 footage of this incredible mammal was captured in its home, the Cyclops Mountains of Indonesia, more than 60 years after it was last seen.

Read the full story of its rediscovery here.

Victorian grassland earless dragon

Another 2023 rediscovery, this Australian lizard was unseen by scientists for more than 50 years. Once common in the state of Victoria, the species became critically endangered in the 1960s due to extensive habitat destruction, with the last confirmed sighting before now happening in 1969.

Based on this a study published in 2019 suggested it may have sadly become extinct. Nevertheless, hope remained for its survival due to various unconfirmed sightings, and in the end, these hopes were borne out, with an ecological survey rediscovering the first individual just last year. Subsequent fieldwork has resulted in the collection of 16 individuals who are now in a breeding programme at Melbourne Zoo.

Australia’s earless dragon is so rare it was thought extinct, until two ecologists came across one in the wild

Coelacanth  

(I wrote a report on this one when I was in the 4th grade. 🙂

The next on our list is perhaps the archetypical Lazarus animal, and unlike the echidna, it was not “lost” for decades but millennia! Known from fossil records since the 19th Century, these ancient fish were thought to have become extinct at the end of the Cretaceous period, some 66 million years ago.

However, much to everyone’s surprise, a live specimen was brought up from the depths by a local fisherman off the coast of South Africa in 1938.

The fisherman himself had no idea of the great significance of his catch, but luckily a museum employee, Marjorie Courtenay-Latimer, happened to examine the fish and knew she was looking at something special. This serendipitous discovery is now considered to be one of the most important zoological findings of the twentieth century.

Chacoan peccary

Like the coelacanth, for a long time this pig-like ungulate was known from fossil records alone. Again, it was thought to be long extinct, existing as paleontological evidence only, and was declared as such.

In 1971 however, a team of biologists decided to follow up on rumoured sightings by locals and “discovered” the species living in the hot and dry Chaco region of Argentina. It should probably be noted that this local knowledge of existence is probably common to many of the animals on this list and when we speak of a species being lost, that could well just mean “lost to Western science”!

Cuban solenodon

New Guinea big-eared bat

Lost for over a century, this bat was first collected in 1890, named (after its massive ears) in 1914, and then… wasn’t seen again. That is until 2012, when two very lucky University of Queensland PhD students collecting bats of many species found one they couldn’t easily identify. They then commenced some rigorous detective work.

After careful examination and comparison with museum specimens it was found to be a female of the long thought extinct big-eared species. This came as a very pleasant surprise to conservationists who had thought it wiped out by habitat loss and human encroachment.

Bring On Bill And Hill

The Streisand effect describes a situation where an attempt to hide, remove, or censor information results in the unintended consequence of the effort instead increasing public awareness of the information

I just love the idea that the MAGA weirdos in the Congress think that bringing Bill and Hillary Clinton in to testify on Epstein will somehow help their cause. In fact, it will create the biggest sideshow since Trump’s fraud trial or the January 6th Committee. The entire media world will be focused on Epstein for days leading up to it, people will talk of nothing else. Bring it on. Every day brings something more, especially with the sloppiness of the release of the documents. The cover up is laughably obvious.

Meanwhile, grand jurors aren’t buying what they’re selling in other cases either:

In Washington, a grand jury refused to return a felony indictment against a man who threw a sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer during a crackdown ordered by President Trump. In Chicago, grand jurors have declined to indict in several felony cases stemming from a similar operation; prosecutors seemed to get the message and dismissed additional cases. In Minnesota, federal prosecutors have charged some demonstrators with misdemeanors in cases involving encounters with federal agents — and it is very likely that they did so in some cases because the prosecutors expected grand juries would reject felony charges.

Federal grand juries in Virginia twice decided not to indict Letitia James, the New York attorney general, after a judge dismissed an initial case against her. Another federal grand jury in Virginia declined at least one charge against James Comey, the former F.B.I. director; the prosecutor later improperly filed a version of the indictment the full grand jury never saw.

This week, a grand jury rejected an effort by the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington to indict the six members of Congress who appeared last year in a video underscoring the obligation of service members to refuse illegal orders.

The incompetence may be the only thing that will save us. They don’t seem to realize that just because Donald Trump orders his enemies to be punished, it doesn’t make it so. Average Americans aren’t having it and they still have something to say about all this.