Skip to content

Month: February 2026

60% of Republicans Are Hopeless

The good news is that maybe 40% or so are not:

More than a week after nurse Alex Pretti was shot and killed by federal immigration agents in Minneapolis, 61 percent of voters think the Trump administration has not given an honest account of the incident and 25 percent think the Trump administration has given an honest account of the incident, with 14 percent not offering an opinion, according to a Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pea-ack) University national poll of registered voters released today.

Democrats (93 – 2 percent) and independents (65 – 20 percent) think the Trump administration has not given an honest account of the incident, while Republicans (60 – 19 percent) think the Trump administration has given an honest account of the incident.

An overwhelming majority of voters (80 percent) think there should be an independent investigation into this shooting, while 15 percent don’t think so.

Most people don’t much like ICE at all:

Fifty-nine percent of voters think the recent ICE-involved shootings in Minneapolis are a sign of broader problems in the way ICE is operating, while 32 percent think the shootings are isolated incidents.

When it comes to the way ICE is enforcing immigration laws, 34 percent of voters approve, while 63 percent disapprove.

This is a drop in approval from Quinnipiac University’s January 13, 2026 poll when 40 percent approved and 57 percent disapproved.

Sixty percent of voters think ICE should withdraw from Minneapolis, while 36 percent think ICE should continue its operations in Minneapolis.

And despite Trump’s insistence that he’s never been more popular, he is sinking fast:


Thirty-seven percent of voters approve of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president, while 56 percent disapprove.

This compares to Quinnipiac University’s January 14, 2026 poll when 40 percent approved and 54 percent disapproved.

When it comes to Trump’s handling of the economy, 39 percent of voters approve, while 56 percent disapprove. In Quinnipiac University’s January 14 poll, 42 percent approved and 53 percent disapproved.

When it comes to Trump’s handling of immigration issues, 38 percent of voters approve, while 59 percent disapprove. This is a drop in approval from Quinnipiac University’s December 17, 2025 poll when 44 percent approved and 54 percent disapproved.

When it comes to Trump’s handling of foreign policy, 37 percent of voters approve, while 58 percent disapprove. In Quinnipiac University’s January 14 poll, 41 percent approved and 56 percent disapproved.

Remember, in the depth of the Great Depression, this was the vote:

In the 1932 U.S. presidential election, Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt won with 57.4% of the popular vote (22,818,740 votes) and 88.9% of the electoral vote (472 votes), defeating Republican incumbent Herbert Hoover, who received 39.6% of the popular vote. 11.1% of the electoral vote (59 votes). 

There’s always at least 40% of right wingers who simply can’t abide liberals.

Nobody Wants To Host A Concentration Camp

Imagine that:

When Stephen Miller offered his first big rollout of Donald Trump’s immigration agenda during the 2024 campaign, he demonstrated great enthusiasm for the idea of giant migrant camps. He gushed about creating “vast holding facilities” built on “open land,” which would enable Trump to escalate the volume and speed of deportations to unprecedented heights. Trembling with excitement, Miller vowed: “President Trump will do whatever it takes.”

But a funny thing has happened with Miller’s authoritarian fever dreams. As plans for these new detention facilities have become public, they’re encountering opposition in some very unlikely places. Notably, that includes regions that backed Trump in 2024.

The whole deportation scheme is becoming a non-starter:

We’re now learning that this year, Immigration and Customs Enforcement plans to retrofit around two dozen vast new facilities. In keeping with Trump-Miller’s visions, ICE vows to detain an additional 80,000 people in them. Some will reportedly hold up to 10,000 detainees apiece. In other words, the Trump-Miller threat to create a system of new detention camps is just getting underway in earnest.

To put a ghoulish twist on the oft-discussed ideal of bureaucratic “capacity,” this will allow Trump and Miller to imprison and then deport vastly more people a whole lot faster. Right now, more than 70,000 migrants are languishing in detention—a record—but the administration is running out of space. Add another 80,000 beds, and it would supercharge expulsion capacity.

Yet these detention dreams are hitting stiff opposition. ICE wants to buy a warehouse in Virginia’s Hanover County, which went for Trump by 26 points in 2024 and combines rural territory with Richmond’s northern suburbs. Residents recently turned out in force and angrily condemned the proposed sale, with local reports suggesting only a “handful” backed it. The GOP-heavy Board of Supervisors opposed the transaction. The warehouse owner canceled the sale.

It’s also happening in GOP districts in New Jersey and even in Oklahoma, Kansas and Utah.

As MS NOW’s Rachel Maddow noted in a useful overview of the opposition Monday night, we’re already seeing mass protests outside existing facilities. Those are smaller than some of the gargantuan new camps ICE hopes to create, yet migrant deaths are already soaring in the current facilities, and the bigger ones will be even worse. “If they build them, they will fill them,” Maddow said, labeling them “prison camps.” She added: “How do you think those facilities are going to be run?”

They are literally concentration camps:

A concentration camp is a facility for confining political prisoners, minorities, or specific demographics, often on the grounds of national security, exploitation, or punishment, typically without trial. These camps often feature severe overcrowding, inhumane conditions, forced labor, and high mortality rates.

Is it possible that Miller over estimated the public’s tolerance for his grotesque scheme?

Venezuela? What Venezuela?

Time is a curious construct in Donald Trump’s second term. It’s hard to believe that it was only one month ago that the U.S. staged a military incursion in Venezuela and abducted Nicolás Maduro, the country’s president, and his wife, bringing them back to America to stand trial. At the time, this seemed like a world-altering event. Now it has almost completely disappeared from the news due to all that’s happened — in Minneapolis, in Iran, in Greenland — in the weeks since. 

Today, it’s just business as usual in the Trump administration. 

On Tuesday the president met with Colombian President Gustavo Petro in the White House, and considering the harsh words exchanged between them over the past year — Petro was a “lunatic” and a “sick man,” Trump said, while Petro accused Trump of being a fascist and “complicit in genocide” — nobody knew what to expect. But Trump signaled all would be well in advance of the meeting, suggesting that his action against Maduro had cowed the Colombian leader, who would now be content to serve as the president of a docile, vassal state of the U.S. 

Apparently Trump was right. The meeting was hailed as a massive success with both of them exchanging hats and autographs, and the president pronouncing his Colombian counterpart as “terrific.”

The descriptor was a long way from the days when Trump was warning that Petro “had better watch his a*s” and musing that invading Colombia “sounds good.” Since it’s easy to flatter Trump — and he doesn’t seem to care about anything beyond what’s happening in the current moment — we can’t know whether this shift in rhetoric is temporary or will be permanent. If he finds it to his benefit to launch another broadside against Petro, he won’t hesitate to do it. 

But for the moment, things have calmed in the region. Latin American countries are all adjusting to the knowledge that the U.S. is now openly proclaiming its dominance of the Western hemisphere and that Trump will be exercising his power in erratic ways for the remainder of his term. All eyes are on Venezuela to see exactly how this bold infringement of national sovereignty shakes out. 

As Petro was traveling to Washington, Delcy Rodríguez, Venezuela’s interim president, met with U.S. chargé d’affaires Laura Dogu to talk about the future. One might have thought such talks would have taken place before now, but the fact that they haven’t is indicative of the administration’s lack of serious day-after strategy. No one still seems to know the plan. 

Last fall, while the U.S. was assembling a large naval task force to patrol the waters off the Venezuelan coast and randomly blowing up small boats at sea — claiming without proof that they were running drugs — back channels had formed. The Guardian reported in January that Rodríguez and her brother Jorge, the head of the National Assembly, agreed in advance to cooperate with the Trump administration once Maduro had been deposed. Suspicions had been raised that this was the case, especially considering how blithely Trump accepted the woman who his own Drug Enforcement Agency had been tracking for years as a drug-running criminal. Then again, he had also just pardoned Juan Orlando Hernández, the former president of Honduras, who had been sentenced to 45 years in prison on charges of trafficking tons of cocaine to the U.S., so all of Trump’s caterwauling about drugs was clearly not something he actually cared about. 

Rodríguez is considered a canny politician who some contend is much less ideological than her leftist history implies. According to the Guardian, her conversations with the Trump administration took place through a back channel in Qatar over the course of months. She reportedly made it plain that she would cooperate with the U.S. after Maduro was exiled or taken into custody, but would not participate in the operation itself. (Rodríguez has denied any cooperation.)

The most important requirement, at least from the administration’s perspective, was her agreement to work with oil companies that the U.S. was determined to bring into the country, ending years of ill will and legal complications. Trump’s plan to make Venezuela great again by taking over their oil fields, though, has encountered roadblocks. American oil companies, the president assumed, would jump at the chance to get in there right away, but that hasn’t happened. There is apparently little incentive to jump into a potentially unstable and unreliable situation, especially considering that someone like Rodríguez, with a fiery political history, is running the place. 

All the while, the interim president has been speaking out of both sides of her mouth, sucking up to Washington, promising full cooperation and releasing some political prisoners, while telling her own people and other countries in the region that she is completely independent and fighting back against U.S. control. Just last week, Rodríguez told a group of oil workers in a widely-televised speech, “Enough already of Washington’s orders over politicians in Venezuela!” When asked about it, Trump shrugged and said that he hadn’t heard her remarks but that he believes they have a very good relationship. 

So far, Rodríguez has had nothing to say about democracy, economics, profiteering or how she might deal with the corruption of Venezuela’s major institutions. But that’s not surprising, since she was in the middle of it all as a long-time member of both the Maduro and Hugo Chavez regimes. She is protecting the status quo and seemingly has no interest in reform. At this point, one might assume the U.S. is fine with that — as long as she agrees to keep the oil flowing and doesn’t cause them any trouble. 

In the event she does, the administration has made no bones of the fact that they are prepared to launch military actions. Trump has even threatened to mete out a “worse fate” than Maduro’s if Rodríguez fails to please him. 

The rest of Latin America is watching and waiting. With the exception of Argentinian President Javier Milei, one of Trump’s most fervent foreign allies, most countries in the region consider Maduro’s seizure and arrest an ominous violation of international law and potentially the first step on the way to realizing America’s stated imperial ambitions. They, too, can read the New York Times, in which Trump declared that the only limit to his global power is “My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me.”

During that interview, he took an off-the-record call with Petro. The Times’ reporters characterized the call as “an example of coercive diplomacy in action” — which is just a fancy way of saying that Trump said to Petro, “Nice little country you have there, would be a shame if anything happened to it.”

This week, after his meeting with the president, Petro walked out of the White House wearing a red MAGA hat to which he had added an “S” with what must have been one of the presidential Sharpies. “Make Americas Great Again,” the edited cap read. 

Apparently, Petro has gotten with Trump’s program.

Salon

What Happened To QAnon Anyway?

Good? Evil? Not everything is political.

There’s been so much fascism to write about and a trove of Epstein documents still to review that I hadn’t noticed. Trae Crowder asks why all the QAnon crazies aren’t taking victory laps. They’ve gone mute.

I know, I know. I’m worn out too. But I needed Trae’s Sgt. York joke this morning. And integrity’s gay.

“Good people fight evil.” Please do.

This Seems Significant

If consistent

Gerrymandering by race : bad. Gerrymandering for partisan advantage : SCOTUS-approved. Remember?

Associated Press:

The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed California to use a new voter-approved congressional map that is favorable to Democrats in this year’s elections, rejecting a last-ditch plea from state Republicans and the Trump administration.

No justices dissented from the brief order denying the appeal without explanation, which is common on the court’s emergency docket.

The justices had previously allowed Texas’ Republican-friendly map to be used in 2026, despite a lower-court ruling that it likely discriminates on the basis of race.

Conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote in December that it appeared both states had adopted new maps for political advantage, which the high court has previously ruled cannot be a basis for a federal lawsuit.

Give SCOTUS points for respecting precedent for once. Their own.

The Epstein Europe Fallout

Garrett Owen at Salon writes:

The release of the latest batch of Epstein files has set off a wave of high-profile resignations and criminal investigations across Europe, even as Trump administration officials resist calls for greater scrutiny.

In the United Kingdom, former U.S. ambassador Peter Mandelson resigned from his position in the House of Lords and the Labour Party after recently released documents detailed his close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Mandelson “lied repeatedly” to officials about his ties to Epstein, adding mgr he had “betrayed our country, our Parliament and my party.”

“I regret appointing him,” Starmer told the House of Commons on Wednesday. “If I knew then what I know now, he would never have been anywhere near government.”

The Slovakian national security advisor, the United Nations Refugee head and numerous Lithuanians have also resigned or been fired, among others.

You may have noticed that nothing like that has happened in the U.S.:

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said the official “review” of the files is “over” and dismissed the prospect of further investigations or charges.

“It’s not a crime to party with Mr. Epstein,” Blanche told Fox News.

President Donald Trump lashed out at a CNN reporter on Tuesday when asked about “justice” for Epstein survivors.

“I think it’s really time for the country to get on to something else, now that nothing came out about me,” he said.

A ton of stuff has come out about him, including accusations of rape and violent abuse. It’s also clear that he was in touch with Epstein long after he says he stopped speaking to him. And it’s not just him, half of his cabinet was partying with him and begging to be included in his nefarious deeds. The more you see of the files, the more obvious it is that his BFF”wingman” for 20 years, Donald Trump, knew what he was doing and participated in it. After all, it seems that most of the wealthy men in the world were in on it.

This story is sickening and it will haunt Trump and many others forever. I’m not a believer in conspiracy theories but I admit that I have, for the first time, begun to seriously question Epstein’s suicide. He certainly had ample reason to do it, but there are so many rich, global elites, including the president, who have an incentive for him to die that it’s impossible to discount the possibility.

Eating His Seed Corn

I’m sure most farmers voted for Trump because of their overarching concerns about transgender kids but they seem to be realizing they made a mistake:

Current economic conditions and Trump administration policies could lead to “a widespread collapse of American agriculture,” a bipartisan coalition of former Agriculture Department officials and leaders of farm groups warned in a letter on Tuesday.

The letter to the heads and ranking members of the House and Senate agricultural committees was signed by 27 influential figures in the farming sector, including former heads of powerful associations representing corn and soybean farmers and officials from the Bush and Reagan administrations. It expressed dismay at the “damage done to American farmers.”

While there are many reasons for increasing farm bankruptcies and decreasing profits, “it is clear that the current administration’s actions, along with congressional inaction, have increased costs for farm inputs, disrupted overseas and domestic markets, denied agriculture its reliable labor pool, and defunded critical ag research and staffing,” the letter warned.

The signatories called on Congress to relax tariffs for the agriculture sector, expand international markets, pass a new farm bill and restore funding for agriculture research and staffing.

Oh heck.

I would assume that every sector of the economy would like Congress to relax tariffs due to exactly the same concerns. But they are whistling past the graveyard because Trump will never, ever give up on them entirely because they are his north star and have been for over 50 years. Sure he might whittle around the edges but he will continue to use them as threats because that’s the main thing he loves about them. And that is what is creating all the uncertainty and the urgent need among foreign nations to find new markets and new suppliers.

As for the other concerns, Stephen Miller isn’t going to give up on his quest to ethnically cleanse the country and Russ Vought isn’t going to give up on starving all government funded research and development in his crusade to turn the nation into a Christian nationalist paradise. And, as we’ve seen, Republicans in Congress are so devoted to their Dear Leader that they are prepared to destroy the country from the inside in order to please him.

The only way to right this will be to thoroughly repudiate this entire movement at the box office and in society and then rebuild from the ground up. It’s going to take at least a few of the people who love the Trump Show and hate people like you and me to get onboard that project. Maybe this is a first step.

Eulogy For A Formerly Great Paper

From its former editor Marty Baron:

They laid off 300 journalists today successfully neutering it so that one of the top five richest men in the world could give Donald Trump a thrill. He didn’t have to do it. He wants to:

7 years ago today:

It’s Miller’s Time

From:

Not only that:

This is important and should, in a sane world change everything. Note the GOP response:

Get a load of this

That means 68% of Trump voters knew what they were voting for.

By the way, majorities support impeaching Noem, including 21% of Republicans.

Who Needs ‘Em?

The US immigrant population generated more in taxes than they received in benefits from all levels of government every year from 1994 to 2023.

The government first began gathering detailed information on benefits use by citizenship status in 1994. The data show:

  • For each year from 1994 to 2023, the US immigrant population generated more in taxes than they received in benefits from all levels of government.
  • Over that period, immigrants created a cumulative fiscal surplus of $14.5 trillion in real 2024 US dollars, including $3.9 trillion in savings on interest on the debt.
  • Without immigrants, US government public debt at all levels would be at least 205 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)—nearly twice its 2023 level.

These results, which do not account for any of immigration’s indirect, tax-revenue-boosting effects on economic growth, represent the lower bound of the positive fiscal effects. Even by this conservative analysis, immigrants may have already prevented a fiscal crisis.

By all means, let’s kick them all out.