Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

Going Off The Rails

I linked to this in passing in an earlier post but I thought you should be able to read the whole thing with a gift link. These Republicans have worked themselves into a frenzy, the likes of which I haven’t seen since Benghazi and “her emails.” It’s pretty shocking.

An excerpt:

The intensity of anger and open desire for using the criminal justice system against Democrats after the verdict surpasses anything seen before in Mr. Trump’s tumultuous years in national politics. What is different now is the range of Republicans who are saying retaliation is necessary and who are no longer cloaking their intent with euphemisms.

Stephen Miller, a former senior adviser to Mr. Trump who still helps guide his thinking on policy, blared out a directive on Fox News after a jury found Mr. Trump guilty of falsifying financial records to cover up a 2016 campaign hush-money payment to a porn actress. Mr. Miller posed a series of questions to Republicans at every level, including local district attorneys. “Is every House committee controlled by Republicans using its subpoena power in every way it needs to right now?” he demanded. “Is every Republican D.A. starting every investigation they need to right now?”“Every facet of Republican Party politics and power has to be used right now to go toe-to-toe with Marxism and beat these Communists,” Mr. Miller said, using the catchall slurs Trump allies routinely use against Democrats.

Stephen K. Bannon, the former chief strategist to Mr. Trump, said in a text message to The New York Times on Tuesday that now was the moment for obscure Republican prosecutors around the country to make a name for themselves by prosecuting Democrats.

Mr. Bannon was convicted in a federal prosecution for failing to comply with a congressional subpoena in the Jan. 6 investigation, and faces trial in September in a New York state court — before the same judge who oversaw Mr. Trump’s trial — in a charity fraud case. “There are dozens of ambitious backbencher state attorneys general and district attorneys who need to ‘seize the day’ and own this moment in history,” Mr. Bannon wrote.

And Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, the top Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee who is in contention to be Mr. Trump’s running mate, wrote on X that President Biden was “a demented man propped up by wicked & deranged people” and it was now time to “fight fire with fire” — using flame emojis to represent the fire.

Read the whole thing and then ask yourself how anyone could worry about Biden’s age in light of this insanity.

They have completely abandoned any pretense of caring about the rule of law. It’s amazing:

Among those calling for eye-for-an-eye prosecutions is John C. Yoo, a University of California, Berkeley, law professor best known as the author of once-secret Bush administration legal memos declaring that the president can lawfully violate legal limits on torturing detainees and wiretapping without warrants.

“In order to prevent the case against Trump from assuming a permanent place in the American political system, Republicans will have to bring charges against Democratic officers, even presidents,” Professor Yoo wrote in an essay published by The National Review.

He added: “Only retaliation in kind can produce the deterrence necessary to enforce a political version of mutual assured destruction; without the threat of prosecution of their own leaders, Democrats will continue to charge future Republican presidents without restraint.”

I’m afraid that if the Supreme Court is similarly afflicted with Fox News brain rot, we could easily see the immunity argument upheld. They will say it’s to “to spare the country” the tit-for-tat this is promising.

We really are going off the rails. For real.

Scattered Thoughts On D-Day Anniversary

I posted my D-Day piece yesterday if you missed it. Biden also drew a line between then and now in his speech today.

Biden’s speech was very good but naturally the cable nets gave it short shrift. The Hunter Biden trial is much more important apparently. Here’s the whole thing in its entirety if you have the time to give it a listen:

Pick Your Fighter

Trump’s short list

Axios reports:

Former President Trump has requested financial and other documents from eight potential VP picks as he formalizes his vetting, an official tells Axios…

Sen. J.D. Vance (Ohio)
North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum
Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.)
Sen. Tim Scott (S.C.)
Ben Carson, former HUD Secretary
Rep. Elise Stefanik (N.Y.)
Rep. Byron Donalds (Fla.)
Sen. Tom Cotton (Ark.)

Between the lines: We’re told the list, reported earlier by Politico and others, is very much subject to change.

Kristi’s dog murder did her in.

I’ve been high on Burgum because of the “central casting” factor. The guys looks like he could be on the three dollar bill. He’s also a billionaire businessman which could be a potent selling point for the rubes who think Trump is a great businessman. And he’s proven himself a to be a totally shameless sycophant.

I suspect Vance and Cotton are the two Trump would really like to have on the ballot because they’re monumental assholes . The three Black choices make me think they’re just there to prove how much he wants to appeal to Black voters by putting a Black man on the ballot. I’ll be surprised if he pulls the trigger on that because as he said on the Apprentice, he doubts that white people will accept it. (He wouldn’t…)

Update:


Apparently Burgum has a “hot wife.”

[H]e may also have something else going for him: his wife, Kathryn Burgum. “Trump likes people who are rich and have hot wives,” a source not associated with Trump’s campaign but closely following the vetting process for potential VP picks told Politico.

Hatred Never Dies

Racists emboldened

Guess by whom?

The father of a Baraboo High School graduate forcibly pulled the district superintendent away from his daughter as she crossed the stage to receive a congratulatory handshake during the school’s graduation ceremony Friday.

The man, who is not being named to protect his daughter’s identity, ran onto the stage just after the girl had been handed her diploma and began working her way down a line of school officials shaking hands.

Before she could get to district Superintendent Rainey Briggs, the man, wearing a white polo shirt and baseball cap, grabbed Briggs by his right arm and pushed him away.

“That’s my daughter,” the man can be heard saying in video of the ceremony by TV43 Baraboo.

Briggs can be heard telling the man, “You better get up off me man. Get away from me bro” as staff working the graduation and three Baraboo police officers including the school resource officer intervened. At one point, a voice can be heard saying, “I don’t want her touching him.”

Police escorted the man out of the school following the incident.

School Board President Kevin Vodak, board members Gwynne Peterson, Katie Kalish and Amy DeLong, and Baraboo High School Principal Steve Considine shared the stage with Briggs. The man did not interact with any of them but only confronted Briggs.

In a statement, district spokesperson Hailey Wagner said a disorderly conduct charge for the man was referred to the Sauk County District Attorney’s Office.

“We would like to emphasize that the safety and well-being of our students, staff, and community members is a top priority,” the statement said.

Friday’s graduation ceremony came during a particularly fraught time in the district. A large group of residents, including a former district teacher who worked in the district prior to Briggs’ tenure, have voiced numerous complaints against Briggs, other administrators and the School Board.

A group is attempting a recall election of the school board president. The Black man assaulted is the district superintendent.

David Cay Johnston:

Racism lives in this Wisconsin town, where a father stormed the graduation stage to ensure his daughter didn’t shake hands with the school superintendent, who is black. Two years ago, graduates to the same school posed for a heil Hitler photo. What’s most troubling is that the others on stage didn’t rush to defend the superintendent, though police and others in the audience did.

Somebody tagged a restaurant near here with a large red swastika and upside-down pitchfork:

Arriving to work Tuesday morning, an Avenue M employee saw a large red swastika and upside-down pitchfork painted on the storefront facing Merrimon Avenue, and sent a photo to Tony Creed, co-owner of the restaurant, around 7:45 a.m.

By the time Ralph Lonow, the other owner of the restaurant, received the photo around 10 a.m. and an Asheville police officer called to inform him about the graffiti, most of the symbol had already been removed by a nearby café owner, he said.

“That’s just testament to how great this neighborhood is,” Lonow said, referring to the removed paint.

David Moritz, a neighbor whose father is a Holocaust survivor,

stood out front of the restaurant for a couple hours, waving the flag of Israel. About an hour in, a brown sedan drove by, and a driver called out “stay right there, I’ll be back to get you,” Moritz said.

A little later, a masked person ran toward him and another flag holder, he said. The assailant threw items at him, including an egg that broke on his shirt. While he was being chased off, Moritz said the masked person vocalized threats.

I spotted the men but had no idea why they were there with flags until this morning. Hate has no season.

“It’s no longer an isolated incident,” said Rochelle Reich, the executive director of Congregation Beth Israel. “It’s now a pattern.”

Listen, this kind of race and ethnic hatred may never die but it can be buried. We can make it so socially unacceptable that racists dare not voice it in public. That they feel emboldened to do so now, and redouble their efforts to subjugate women, is a product not only of social changes that produced MAGA and Trump, but of our own post-Civil Rights era complacency.

It’s not enough to narrowly beat them at the ballot box. Trump, MAGA, and resurgent fascism must be refuted overwhelmingly this fall. What are you going to do about it?

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

For The Win, 5th Edition is ready for download. Request a copy of my free countywide GOTV planning guide at ForTheWin.us.

80 Years Later

We’re still fighting fascism

Gen. George Patton autograph my late FIL picked up during the war.

June 6 is my parents’ anniversary. As a Boomer, I remember the date first for that. My father was too young for WWII. But my late father-in-law was not. He arrived in Europe after the D-Day invasion, but fighting as an infantryman and a scout for the 100th Infantry Division marked him for life. His shelves were filled with books on the war, on Hitler and the Nazis. As a young man, how could the rest of his life compare with that experience? But he rarely discussed the fighting.

 
Post by @ajsandyman
View on Threads

 
Post by @therickwilson
View on Threads

In his things after he died, we found a Bronze Star Ken never mentioned. I discovered the Pentagon gave them out like party favors to soldiers who’d been in theater a decade or so after the war. So it was not something he’d brag about. He valued another medal more.

We brought him to a Democratic fundraiser dinner once where Sen. Max Cleland of Georgia was the featured speaker. (You remember him. He lost three limbs in Vietnam.) They’d invited veterans. Our table was full of men Ken’s age. On his jacket, Ken wore his Combat Infantryman Badge earned for being “personally present, under fire, and engaging the enemy in ground forces combat.”

During the meal, a head suddenly popped in next to mine. It was Cleland, working the room from his wheelchair with his one arm. Cleland looked at Ken across the table and said, “I see that CIB, brother. You know what it’s all about.”

Old men teared up around the table.

Eighty years later, Europe still remembers the soldiers who liberated their countries from fascism. They are literally a dying breed.

President Joe Biden was in Normandy to deliver a speech today in remembrance. Had Biden’s 2024 opponent won in 2020, any speech he were forced to give would be a cold, empty atrocity. Just thinking about it makes me want to puke.

Like the women still fighting to restore the rights the Axis of Trump took from them, I can’t believe we still have to fight this fascist shit.

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

For The Win, 5th Edition is ready for download. Request a copy of my free countywide GOTV planning guide at ForTheWin.us.

Oh, Jared

Overwhelming corruption:

Former Obama deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner engaged in a “level of corruption that we’ve just never seen” when talking about his firm’s recent investments overseas. 

Rhodes made the comment when asked about The New York Times’s recent reporting that detailed that 99 percent of Kushner’s investment fund’s money came from foreign sources. The outlet also reported Kushner is working on developing hotels in the Balkans, specifically in Serbia and Albania, and noted that the firm has taken money from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

“I mean, look, this is not subtle corruption that we’re looking at,” Rhodes told MSNBC’s Alex Wagner during his Wednesday appearance on “Alex Wagner Tonight.”

“This is a guy, Jared Kushner, who had no expertise, no qualification whatsoever to be in the White House while he was there. He made it his account to work in the Gulf Arab states. He basically helped lead the cover-up for [Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman]. Get him in from the cold after the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.”

Rhodes said Kushner securing a $2 billion investment from Saudi Arabia six months after leaving the White House is a way for Crown Prince Mohammed to exert influence on U.S. foreign policy if Trump returns to the Oval Office after the November election.

“Basically, what we can take from that investment is that in a second Trump term, U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and around the world will be made entirely with the interests of Mohammed bin Salman in mind,” Rhodes said. 

More news on the Jared front from Michel Isikoff:

After weathering criticism over its reliance on a gusher of Saudi cash, Jared Kushner’s investment fund made its first big splash last month when it announced it had signed a $500 million deal with the Serbian government to develop a high end real estate project in downtown Belgrade on the site of a bombed down army building destroyed during the 1999 Kosovo war.

But the fine print of the deal includes a commitment that seems destined to stir up even more international controversy: a pledge by Kushner’s firm, Affinity Partners, to construct a “memorial dedicated to all the victims of NATO aggression”— an allusion to the U.S.-backed bombing campaign that brought the Serbian government of Slobodan Milosevic to its knees a quarter century ago in response to its relentless campaign of repression and savage massacres of ethnic Albanians in Kosovo.

Among those exercised over the Kushner deal is retired Gen. Wesley Clark, who served as NATO Supreme Allied Commander during the war.

While he has no objection to a U.S. firm investing in Serbia, the planned revisionist memorial—officially proclaiming America’s adversary in the war to have been a victim of  “aggression”— “is worse than a reversal” of U.S. policies in the region, said Clark in an interview with SpyTalk. “It’s a betrayal of the United States, its policies and the brave diplomats and airmen who did what they could to stop Serb ethnic cleansing.” 

Just as concerning as the whitewashing of Serbian war crimes, Clark said, is the just announced deal between Kushner’s firm and the Serbian government of Aleksander Vučić, a pro-Russian hardliner who once served as minister of information in Milosevic’s government. The memorial project needs to be viewed in a wider geopolitical context: It serves the Kremlin’s core interests in undermining NATO at a time the alliance is engaged in resisting Russian aggression in Ukraine.

Neither Kushner nor representatives of his Miami-based firm responded to requests for comment. But the remarks by Clark are likely to draw further attention to a project that has generated strong  criticism from Serbian opposition leaders as well as questions about potential conflicts of interest if Kushner’s father in law, Donald Trump (for whom he is once again raising money) is elected president in November.

They are all criminals. Every last one of them.

Can You Believe It?

Sadly, yes…

Republicans used to call themselves the moral majority.

Last week, Donald Trump was convicted on 34 felony charges in the hush-money case against him. Compared to before the verdict, the biggest changes we found in a post-conviction poll conducted between May 31 and June 2 are in Republicans’ positions on felony, crime in general, and the presidency. They have shifted in a way that puts the verdict in a more favorable light and keeps Trump’s candidacy viable. For example, fewer Republicans think it should be illegal to pay hush money for the purposes of influencing an election than did a year ago, and more now say felons should be allowed to become president than did a few months ago.

Sigh…

“Look What You Made Me Do!!!”

He then said “Some people said I should have done it. Would have been very easy to do it. But I thought it would be a terrible precedent for our country.”

Philip Bump responds:

This is nonsense. Trump’s administration did attempt to effect legal retribution against his opponents, including Clinton. It wasn’t that he didn’t try, it was that it wasn’t “very easy” to do.

Trump came into office railing against the intelligence community and the FBI because of the investigation into Russian interference that was publicly reported soon after he won the 2016 election. He fired FBI Director James B. Comey in an explicit effort to kneecap that probe, resulting in the appointment of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. Mueller ultimately determined that there were links between Trump’s campaign and Russian actors, and that the campaign embraced Russia’s assistance, but that there was no coordination that violated the law.

But from the outset — even before Mueller was appointed — Trump decided this was all a “witch hunt.” He’d wanted Attorney General Jeff Sessions to uproot it, but Sessions recused himself from decisions related to the probe. This was repeatedly frustrating to Trump, who wanted Sessions to reverse his recusal “so that Sessions could direct the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute Hillary Clinton,” as Sessions told Mueller’s investigators.

After the 2018 election, Sessions was booted and, a few months later, William P. Barr was brought in. Barr had voluntarily written a letter to Trump criticizing the Mueller probe before his appointment; he spent much of the rest of Trump’s term attempting to prove it had been a political hit job.

He tasked U.S. Attorney John Durham — eventually elevated to a special counsel after Trump lost his reelection bid — to suss out the real triggers for the Russia investigation. Durham made no significant progress in this regard, but he did spend a great deal of energy attempting to position Clinton as a central trigger for the probe.

The idea was that the Clinton campaign’s elevation of questions about Trump’s links to Russia (including a quickly discredited rumor involving a Russian bank) was the point of origin for such questions. The reality, as Mueller established and as a report from the Justice Department inspector general reinforced, was that there were numerous links between Trump’s team and Russia and that there was an obvious effort by Russia to upend the election. Durham brought charges against an attorney linked to Clinton. The attorney was acquitted.

Last year, the New York Times’s Charlie Savage explained that the pivot to focusing on Clinton came only after Durham was unable to uncover nefarious intent on the part of the FBI.“By keeping the investigation going,” Savage wrote, “Mr. Barr initially appeased Mr. Trump, who, as Mr. Barr recounted in his memoir, was angry about the lack of charges as the 2020 election neared.”

The evidence wasn’t there — and then they ran out of time.

Bump goes on to lay out all the reasons why there will be much more of this if he’s re-elected. First, he won’t have to worry about re-election. Either he will adhere to the Constitution or he will simply refuse to leave. So there’s that.

He’ll hand pick a bootlicking, MAGA Attorney General who will eagerly do whatever he tells them to do. And he’ll get rid of anyone on the DOJ who stands in the way.

Most importantly, he’ll have the total backing of the official Republican Party and the right wing media. As Bump writes:

The Washington Post on Tuesday detailed how his allies hope to exact revenge against Trump’s prosecutors. The New York Times on Wednesday listed prominent voices calling for a re-inaugurated President Trump to use federal power against his opponents. Many of them use the language Trump presented to Kelly: Look what you made us do. But, again, Trump had already tried to do it — perhaps along multiple avenues.

He will do it. Trump’s philosophy of life is based upon vengeance. It has been since he was a very young man.

What Rigging?

This is really getting terrifying:

Julie Adams, a member of the Fulton County election board, filed her lawsuit on May 22 with the help of lawyers from America First Policy Institute, a pro-Trump think tank. The lawsuit seeks access to voting records that Adams says she was denied by Fulton County’s election director, Nadine Williams, and also seeks the court’s ruling on whether Adams’ duty to certify election results is up to her discretion. 

Adams’ lawsuit specifically requests that the judge “clarify” that her “duties are, in fact, discretionary, not ministerial.”

This MAGA flunky wants the “discretion” to overturn the election results.

[…]

The Adams lawsuit is an attempt to pave the way for Republican election officials to deny election results en masse — a fundamental part of Trump’s strategy of baselessly questioning election results and making claims of widespread voter fraud. According to Axios, the Republican National Committee has been staffing up lawyers, legal observers, and poll watchers to “gather string for lawsuits challenging the results of the Nov. 5 vote.” The RNC “plans to hire more people for the operation than for any other department it has,” Axios reported. 

It sure doesn’t sound like a confident campaign to me.