Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

Tech-industrial Complex

A clear and present danger

After the obligatory niceties and review of his accomplishments in office, President Joe Biden’s farewell address from the Oval Office got to the nub of it: America is at risk. That is, from “the dangerous concentration of power in the hands of a very few ultrawealthy people.”

Today, an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead. We see the consequences all across America. And we’ve seen it before.

More than a century ago, the American people stood up to the robber barons back then and busted the trusts. They didn’t punish the wealthy. They just made the wealthy play by the rules everybody else had. Workers want rights to earn their fair share. You know, they were dealt into the deal, and it helped put us on the path to building the largest middle class, the most prosperous century any nation the world has ever seen. We’ve got to do that again.

The ultrawealthy and their enablers among the Republican Party have made no secret for decades that their goal is eradicating post-New Deal America and returning to the McKinley era of robber barons.

William Greider warned two decades ago:

The movement’s grand ambition—one can no longer say grandiose—is to roll back the twentieth century, quite literally. That is, defenestrate the federal government and reduce its scale and powers to a level well below what it was before the New Deal’s centralization. With that accomplished, movement conservatives envision a restored society in which the prevailing values and power relationships resemble the America that existed around 1900, when William McKinley was President. Governing authority and resources are dispersed from Washington, returned to local levels and also to individuals and private institutions, most notably corporations and religious organizations. The primacy of private property rights is re-established over the shared public priorities expressed in government regulation. Above all, private wealth—both enterprises and individuals with higher incomes—are permanently insulated from the progressive claims of the graduated income tax.

They reactionary rich were patient, Grieder continued, methodical. They “understand that three steps forward, two steps back still adds up to forward progress. It’s a long march, they say. Stick together, because we are winning.” And well-funded. Extremely well-funded.

Biden the D.C. long-hauler might not have seen it in 2003, but he sees it now:

You know, in his farewell address, President Eisenhower spoke of the dangers of the military-industrial complex. He warned us that about, and I quote, “The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power.” Six days — six decades later, I’m equally concerned about the potential rise of a tech-industrial complex that could pose real dangers for our country as well.

Americans are being buried under an avalanche of misinformation and disinformation enabling the abuse of power. The free press is crumbling. Editors are disappearing. Social media is giving up on fact-checking. The truth is smothered by lies told for power and for profit. We must hold the social platforms accountable to protect our children, our families and our very democracy from the abuse of power. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence is the most consequential technology of our time, perhaps of all time.

Just as the GOP teamed up with the religious right to usher in the Reagan era, the oligarchy greasing palms in Donald Trump’s America has teamed not only with Christian nationalists, but with autocrats, white supremacists and, as I’ve argued, rump-royalists who would rather be subjects than citizens. Not in McKinley’s America from the end of the 19th century, but in the Old South at the end of the 18th. (Someone must have drawn up a Venn diagram.)

@msnbc

Rachel Maddow reacts to President Biden’s final remarks from the White House, calling them “stark and sober” and saying they put a shiver down her spine. “This was a love letter to America for a outgoing president who is very worried about what he describes as oligarchy,” she added. #joebiden #presidency #oligarchy #donaldtrump #elonmusk #democracy #politics #news

♬ original sound – MSNBC

This is serious, and it’s not as if any of it is new. Biden twice argued that to undo the new Gilded Age that the ultrawealthy must again be made to pay their “fair share” in taxes.

Though of lesser international stature than Biden, historian Rutger Bregman made the same case five years ago, not into a camera but into the very faces of the world’s economic elite.

A Public Service Announcement

I just have one question….

Give Trump’s cabinet nominees this much: they were thoroughly coached for their confirmation hearings.

Whenever a Senate committee member this week asked Fox News weekend co-anchor Pete Hegseth (nominee for secretary of defense) to answer allegations of drunkenness or whatever, his default answer was “anonymous smears.” Over and over. Despite senators telling him to his face that the committee has documents naming the people, including Fox co-workers, who made those allegations.

When Democratic senators on Wednesday asked Pam Bondi (nominee for attorney general) if she agreed with positions taken by her prospective employer (Donald Trump), the former Florida attorney general defaulted multiple times to variations on “I’m not familiar with the statement.”

To date, no Democrat has as I suggested asked any Trump nominee if they had reason to doubt their qualifications for the job, and if they did, why they accepted anyway.

But another question that came up a couple of times in Bondi’s hearing was whether she would admit that President Trump lost the 2020 election. Hegseth and other Trump supporters have similarly refused to say so.

It must appear to the casual observer, and especially to MAGA Republicans, like a “gotcha” question, a trap to draw Trump’s ire. Everyone knows that Trump refuses to admit he lost. To salve his bruised ego, he still claims the election was stolen. Trump considers it a sign of fealty and obeisance, like kowtowing to the emperor, that his subjects agree. To the likes of Hegseth and Bondi, the question must feel like an anti-inquisitor’s demand to renounce the MAGA faith. But for people pursuing the responsibility for upholding the U.S. Constitution and the republic it is more meaningful than that.

Asking a Trump cabinet nominee — yes/no — whether Donald Trump lost the 2020 election is not a “gotcha” question. It’s a test. Do you have the spine, the personal integrity, to disagree with your future boss when he’s wrong or demands you do something improper or illegal?

Pam Bondi doesn’t have a spine. Nor does Pete Hegseth, though he may have faced bullets in combat.

Bondi, Hegseth, MAGA Republicans in elected office, and the foot soldiers at Trump’s rallies have mistaken bluster for courage. The more they double down on the former, the more obvious it is that they lack the latter. And they’ll never admit it. They’re lying to themselves and to us.

Their refusal marks them as subjects, not citizens. They have no business serving in a democratic republic. But then, that’s not Donald Trump aim for this country, is it?

This has been a public service announcement.

Simply The Worst

Of course:

Oil executive Chris Wright, President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Energy Department, has argued that climate change has not fueled more frequent and severe wildfires — a claim at odds with the scientific consensus.

Wright’s arguments drew scrutiny from Senate Democrats during his confirmation hearing Wednesday, as deadly wildfires continue to ravage the Los Angeles area, destroying thousands of homes and killing at least 25 people.

In a 2021 appearance on the PetroNerds podcast, Wright criticized mainstream media outlets for drawing a connection between wildfires and warming. Wildfires are “a major thing in the news now,” he said. “‘It’s climate change. It’s climate change.’ … The short answer: It is not.”

Wright, head of the fracking company Liberty Energy, has also disputed this connection in more recent LinkedIn posts, according to a review of his comments conducted by the environmental group Evergreen Action and shared with The Washington Post.

In the summer of 2023, as smoke from Canadian wildfires engulfed the East Coast, Wright wrote on LinkedIn that “the hype over wildfires is just hype to justify” harmful climate policies. He linked to a Wall Street Journal opinion piece by Bjorn Lomborg, a Danish political scientist and author who contends that experts have overstated the negative impacts of climate change.

I haven’t heard climate denier Bjorn Lomborg’s name bandied about in a while. (Granted, I may just not have been reading the right stuff.) And I can’t say that I expect anything less of an oil man.

But still. I’m very worried about the kids. I’m not going to see the very worst of this but they are. It’s just devastating that we can’t seem to do what’s necessary to at least slow this process down. People like this corrupt liar obviously don’t love their own children. There’s no other way to explain it.

WDTVRW?

What do Trump voters really want: the perennial question.

The Pew poll asked the question. They also asked what they really think. Let’s just say, it’s not reassuring:

They are also liars, at least to themselves:

That is nuts. He was clear as mud about everything but immigration and tariffs. The rest was just the usual bluster and bullshit.

Utter nonsense. They will meltdown like the wicked witch of the west if he shows even the slightest concern for the Americans who didn’t vote for him. Luckily for them, he’s never going to do that.

Some Good News For A Change

Israel and Hamas have agreed to a cease fire and the release of at least some of the hostages:

The cease-fire was set to take effect on Sunday, Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani of Qatar, a mediating country, told reporters on Wednesday evening. He added, though, that both sides were still working on concluding some of the logistical matters…

Mr. Al Thani said the first phase of the cease-fire deal would see Israeli forces withdraw to the east, away from populated areas. Some 33 hostages would be released over the course of the 42 days, he said. He did not say how many Palestinian prisoners would be released.

[…]

Mr. Biden said that in addition to the hostage releases, Palestinians will be able to return to their homes and will have access to a surge of humanitarian supplies.

“Too many innocent people have died; too many communities have been destroyed,” he said in a speech at the White House. “In this deal, the people of Gaza can finally recover and rebuild.”

  • What’s in the deal: The cease-fire deal in Gaza is broadly similar to a three-phase framework publicized by President Biden in late May, according to several officials familiar with the talks. Under that May proposal, Israel and Hamas would first observe a six-week cease-fire in which Hamas would release women, older men, and ill hostages in exchange for the release of Palestinians jailed by Israel, and 600 trucks carrying humanitarian relief would enter Gaza daily.
  • Right-wing opposition: In Israel, some hard-line members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government have also voiced opposition to the deal. But on Wednesday, Mr. Saar said he believed that a majority would sign off on an agreement if it came to a cabinet vote.
  • Hostage talks: The deal on the table comes after months of shuttle diplomacy to end the war in Gaza, which began when Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and saw 250 taken hostage. Since Israel began its military campaign in response to the October 2023 attack, at least 45,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, according to health officials there.

Some people are not happy. Not happy at all:

Ooopsie!

Meanwhile, the press is doing its usual thing.

Regardless of American politics, this is good news for Gaza and the families of the hostages. I don’t doubt that Trump’s impending inauguration had something to do with it but I sincerely doubt that he had some magic pixie dust that made it happen. It just makes sense to get it done now before the new regime. Nobody thinks this can go on forever.

Is There Even A Point To This?

There was a time not all that long ago when confirmation hearings were at least slightly meaningful. Sure, they were mostly just pro forma since the new president is always presumed to have the prerogative to appoint his own cabinet. And even judicial nominees, including those for the Supreme Court, only became contentious when the Republicans started nominating extremist judges.

But things have changed. The Republicans have learned that there is no price to pay for appointing unqualified and unfit sycophants and far right ideologues and so that’s what they are doing. In this current round the nominees aren’t even meeting with the Democrats before their hearings as it’s assumed that only Republican votes matter and they know they have enough of those going in because they’ve successfully intimidated anyone who might have had an objection.

Jane Mayer’s latest piece in the New Yorker is about the pressure campaign to confirm Pete Hegseth:

At the Senate confirmation hearing for Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump’s nominee for Secretary of Defense, on Tuesday, the most telling feature may be the voices from whom the senators won’t hear. The Trump transition team has waged an intense, and in many ways unprecedented, behind-the-scenes campaign ahead of the hearing to intimidate and silence potential witnesses, aimed at keeping Republican senators in line and in the dark.

Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democratic member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which will be holding Hegseth’s hearing, told me, “I’m deeply concerned by an apparent pattern of intimidation and threats, whether it’s legal action or reputational harm. They’re playing the hardest of hardball. It’s harder by several orders of magnitude than in almost any other confirmation.” Senator Elizabeth Warren, another Democrat on the committee, said the pressure tactics “seem designed” to insure that witnesses “don’t speak up.” Blumenthal said that “it’s been pretty unnerving” for Senate Republicans, “because this nominee is so deeply unqualified and unprepared,” yet they fear political retaliation from Trump if they vote their consciences.

Referring to reports that Hegseth, a former National Guard major and Fox News weekend host with minimal civilian management experience, has been accused of drunkenness on the job, sexual impropriety at work, and other kinds of professional misconduct, Blumenthal said, “Someone who is inebriated, or self-dealing, or managerially incompetent in this position could put the whole nation at risk. My Republican colleagues are unsettled,” he added, “and some genuinely feel scared and intimidated.”

This is not normal politics by the standards we used to have but I think it’s the new normal with a convicted criminal as president, the richest man in the world willing to use his fortune to enforce his will and millions of violent cultists ready to attack. To say this changes the calculation is a monumental understatement.

Hegseth is manifestly unfit and unqualified to lead the Pentagon. Most Republicans know this. Many don’t care because they have no respect for government anyway. Some do but are afraid of the mob. And many of them just see this as the price they pay for power and are more than willing to go along. None of them are willing to take a chance on losing their seats over it. Real profiles in courage.

Meanwhile, today, we have this grotesque display from what will certainly be the new Attorney General of the United States:

Perhaps that’s just practice for her Supreme Court confirmation hearings. After all, those GOP nominees all lie under oath as well.

Confirmation hearings are a farce in this hyper partisan age but never more than now. Their shamelessness knows no bounds. I’m just waiting to see how many Democrats decide that it’s in their personal interest to go along with it.

Enraging

https://twitter.com/tedlieu/status/1879341834524393674

These are such loathsome people I can hardly contain myself. I would say that we should withhold aid from them when the inevitable disaster hits their states but what good would that do? They simply have no understanding of the social contract or even what the definition of a nation is. They are horrible liars and corrupt criminals and I just don’t see how we can survive with people like this running the government.

I hope that every Democrat in the country runs ads with these people making these grotesque comments and ask if that’s what America is really all about. Abstract paeans to democracy obviously can’t get people off their couches. Maybe this will. (Sadly, I’m not optimistic.)

And then there’s this lunacy:

He hates windmills because he hates the way they looked in the ocean outside his Scottish golf course and they wouldn’t remove them.

Oligarchy, American Style

When President-elect Trump held a press availability as he was speaking to Republican Governors last week he rattled off a number of big names who’d made the pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago to kiss the ring of the new Don. He actually sounded rather surprised by it, saying, “they all came. Jeff Bezos came, Bill Gates came, Mark Zuckerberg came, many of them came numerous times, the bankers have all come, everybody’s coming. I haven’t had anyone say anything bad about me. I’m not used to it.”

He believes they come because they are dazzled by the power and strength of his massive electoral victory (like nobody’s ever seen before!) but none of them are as dumb or as deluded as he is so that’s obviously not the case. I’m going to guess they’re dazzled by the richest man in the world’s proximity to him and they want a piece of that action. Elon Musk has opened the door to a new style of oligarchy, American style.

The history of Russia after the fall of communism is instructive here. Under the first president of Russia, Boris Yeltsin, in the 1990s, a group of snake oil salesmen and scam artists swooped in to take advantage of the opening that “shock therapy” provided and gobbled up valuable state owned properties and resources at fire sale prices and made themselves into billionaires overnight. They were thoroughly corrupt and basically robbed the Russian people blind.

When Vladimir Putin eventually replaced the discredited Yeltsin, he called them all to the Kremlin and laid down the law demanding that they pledge fealty to him personally and do what they were told. If they complied they would be allowed to keep their ill-gotten fortunes as long as they made sure that tribute was paid to him. Some did not and were thrown into a Siberian prison or forced into exile or died in suspicious circumstances. The rest complied and Putin is reputed to actually be the richest man in the world although his fortune is not publicly traceable.

Obviously, Donald Trump is no Vladimir Putin. He doesn’t have that kind of authority in the American system (at least not yet) or the savvy to use it as efficiently as Putin. But he thinks he’s doing the same thing. In truth he’s more of a Yeltsin, gladly accepting the attention and flattery of the oligarchs as they attempt to steer the government in their favor.

He has no idea what they’re really after. For example, at his press conference last week at mar-a-Lago he was asked if he thought Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg had changed the company’s policies to favor Trump because of his threats, he replied “probably.” I really doubt that’s the reason.

Yes, it’s true that Trump threatened Zuckerberg with life in prison for “plotting” against him during the 2020 election by “steering” Facebook against him. Now, all is forgiven as Zuckerberg has decided to follow Trump’s Rasputin, Elon Musk’s, lead and allow right wing propaganda to flourish on Facebook and Instagram to please the Dear Leader. It’s a small price to pay for such close proximity to power. And after all, Zuckerberg has long considered himself the spitting image of Roman Emperor Augustus Caesar so it’s only right.

Jeff Bezos similarly has tasked Amazon with making a $40 million dollar documentary about Melania Trump as a token of his appreciation as well as a million dollar donation to the Inauguration slush fund. In fact all the oligarchs are ponying up big bucks for that event. It’s unknown what Bill Gates got out of his visitation but one assumes that he too has seen the advantage of getting up close and personal with this elderly narcissist who is so easily swayed by flattery and attention.

And then there’s Musk himself who appears to be even more narcissistic than Trump himself and has apparently convinced himself that he has somehow been anointed as a man who will rule the world through Donald Trump. He’s not only created a grandiose outside group that basically answers to no one (well, there’s Donald Trump, but he’s clueless about what they’re up to) and now he’s meddling in other countries’ politics as well. (His recent foray into the UK has not been well received by the locals.)

The latest rumor is that he’s been approached to buy the most popular social media company in the world, Tik Tok. Between him and Zuckerberg, Trump friendly oligarchs would then dominate that media sphere for their own and Donald Trump’s benefit. The potential for reality shaping propaganda will explode exponentially.

Meanwhile, the bankers, the CEOs and the Big Money Boys on Wall Street are also on board. The Financial Times reports that they are thrilled with Trump’s election. Corporations all over the country are ostentatiously cancelling their DEI programs and any form of LGBTQ celebrations and Pride promotions. Apparently, they are all very excited to go back to just hiring the white males so they no longer have to worry about MAGA boycotts and death threats.

One Wall Street fellow told the Times, “Most of us don’t have to kiss a– because, like Trump, we love America and capitalism.” A top banker said, “I feel liberated! We can say ‘re—rd’ and ‘p–sy’ without the fear of getting canceled… it’s a new dawn.” (Interesting that he didn’t let them use his name, however.)

This is the new American oligarchy — crude, extremely wealthy men cozying up to the new president, a convicted criminal and adjudicated sexual abuser, a man who attempted to illegally overturn an election, who bungled a major national crisis and remains the most ignorant person to ever sit in the oval office. They know exactly what they can get from him. He’s much more Yeltsin than Putin.

The full picture will be clear on inauguration day with this tableau:

Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg will attend President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration Monday, according to an official involved with planning the event. They will have a prominent spot at the ceremony, seated together on the platform with other notable guests, including Trump’s Cabinet nominees and elected officials.

Oh, and Speaker of House Mike Johnson has overturned centuries of protocol and will order the flags that are flying at half mast for the death for former president Jimmy Carter to be raised on inauguration day so that none of those dignitaries will have to be reminded of what the presidency used to be before the oligarchs took over.

Salon

Maybe The Storm Really Is Coming

MAGA will “fight for Trump.” Will Dems fight for us?

Former D.C. Metropolitan Police officer Michael Fanone almost died defending the U.S. Capitol from the violent MAGA mob on Jan. 6, 2021.

“I don’t believe we live in a democracy anymore,” Fanone told Huffington Post earlier this month. “I believe democracy in this country is dead, and it died when the Supreme Court granted the president of the United States immunity for official acts and then failed to define what the fuck official acts are.”

Unofficial acts by Trump’s followers committed against Fanone and his family continue four years later. To the point that he doesn’t report many of them to the police:

Someone threw a brick at his mother’s home a little over a month ago, he said. Fanone said there was another incident where his mother was raking leaves in her front yard and a man “pulled up and threw a bag of shit on her.”

Jack Smith will be watching his back for a long time.

After the Department of Justice released special counsel Smith’s report on the Jan. 6 insurrection on Tuesday, Greg Sargent spoke with historian Julian Zelizer about his recent piece in The New Republic .

If you believe Trump’s bullshit about destroyed and deleted information, his innocense and his landslide, he’s got a “university” in Manhattan to sell you. Sargent observes that Trump’s tweet gloats, I got away with it.

Michael Podhorzer at his substack confirmed Fanone’s assessment. The high court shielded Trump from prosecution and enabled him to run again for office (and win) by neutering the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment. Podhorzer wrote, “In any other country, we would understand that as part of an autocratic takeover, not a democratic victory.”

The Republican Party decided Trump was their best vehicle for maintaining power, said Zelizer. (Just as Christian nationalists have decided he’s their path to restoring their political and cultural dominance, I’d add.)

Zelizer advised Democrats in his piece “to “to embrace the power of partisan polarization.” Trump’s victory was narrow (despite his boasts):

Over the next two years, the party will have one shot to block the radical retrenchment of core government policies, the erosion of cherished American values, and the aggressive exercise of presidential power. They will need to use all the procedural and financial weapons available to keep their own members in line and to reward those who stand firm in their opposition, all the while communicating a compelling message through new media to win back voters before 2026. 

There are a lot of ifs behind that recommendation.

Zelizer told Sargent on Tuesday:

And Democrats are really struggling, even with signs of the fight, to figure out what they’re going to do in the next couple years. Just all this added together with the fact he won reelection despite what Smith had been investigating says positive things for his political standing at the moment. But at the moment is different than in a year. And that’s part of what we’ll watch how it plays out.

[…]

Democrats not only have to be strong, but one of the things they can do is create very small fissures in the House Republican caucus, for example, and it will cause immense problems for the Republicans to be able to do anything.

There is a lot of on-the-one-hand, on-the-other-hand to that assessment. But Democrats’ prospects are hampered by their own conflict-averse inertia. We saw some fight on Tuesday out of Democratic women during the Senate Armed Services Committee questioning of Pete Hegseth, Trump’s impossibly unqualified nominee for secretary of defense. It won’t be enough.

What Hegseth and Trump’s other nominees represent is not just the collapse of competence and the Republicans’ rejection of ethics, American values and democracy itself. It is their embrace of might making right.

David Hogg, candidate for DNC first vice chair, writes in a FB ad that “the people making decisions for the Democratic Party care more about keeping their jobs than about fighting for us.” Do they even retain the muscle memory? What worries me most right now is how much Fanone’s experience demonstrates that Trump’s MAGA brownshirts over the long haul are more willing to “fight for Trump.”