Every statement is a Rorschach test

Americans of the Trump 2.0 era don’t need guns to have hair triggers. Digby already remarked on Donald Trump’s self-own Sunday night with Nora O’Donnell of “60 Minutes.” She quoted from the “manifesto” of Saturday night’s White House Correspondents’ Association dinner shooting suspect: “I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands in his crimes.”
Trump pounced, attacking O’Donnell for reading the line:
Trump: “I was waiting for you to read that because I knew you would because you’re horrible people…I’m not a rapist. I didn’t rape anybody.
O’Donnell: Oh you think he was referring to you?
“I’m not a pedophile,” Trump said, ignoring the question.
Everyone knows that the alleged attacker meant Trump without naming him. Including Trump. O’Donnell meant to bait him by quoting it. She got her sound bite.
But as I mentioned Friday, someone in this heated political environment will read partisan motive into any comment on current events even when no personalities, parties, programs or policies get named. Every statement is a Rorschach test. One person’s “Thank you for seeing me” is another’s thumb in the eye.
Of course, that’s exactly what Trump was hoping to give the assembled media on Saturday night before an aborted assassination thwarted his plans. He meant to get even for his roasting at the 2011 WHCA event. Getting even may be one of Trump’s few principles. Even if it takes 15 years.
Trump telegraphed his move. John Barron opines for the Australian Broadcasting Company:
Appearing back in the White House Press Briefing Room after the dinner and speech were cancelled on the orders of the Secret Service, Trump still dressed in black tie, suggested his speech would now have to be rewritten.
“I was all set to really rip it … and I said to my people this would be the most inappropriate speech ever made,” Trump said, before adding, “I don’t know if I could ever be as rough as I was going to be tonight, I think I’m probably going to be very nice … I’ll be very boring the next time.”
Trump meant to give it back to the press ten times worse. Oh, the disappointment!
The irony? “John Barron” is the pseudonym Trump once used on the phone with reporters to promote himself.
Trump gets even with people for not coming to his aid, as he told Charlie Rose in 1992. Now means to get even with NATO for not helping him attack Iran, despite NATO being a defensive alliance. NATO countries had no obligation to aid Trump.
I don’t know the gentleman below. Trump may not know “what Russia is planning for the Baltic states,” but the rest rings true. So watch for it:
Trump keeps saying “NATO wasn’t there when we needed them.” He says it like a grievance. He will keep saying it. Expect it at every rally between now and 2028.
Understand what he is actually doing. He is not venting. He is building a case.
Because he knows what Russia is planning for the Baltic states, and he is pre-loading the public argument for why Article 5 does not apply when that moment arrives.
“We asked, they refused.” That is the exit ramp. Simple. Memorable. Wrong, but effective.
Trump has had it in for NATO since he first took office in 2017. Now he has another cudgel for getting even. He bides his time and never forgets.
(h/t NK)






