Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

Will We Soon Be Free Of Elon?

When Donald Trump first hooked up with Elon Musk during the campaign last year I think most people thought it was just a rather flashy example of a rich guy with mega billions in government contracts putting his money behind a politician who promised to cut taxes and regulations, which happens every day in American politics. Musk had famously become red-pilled in the last few years and was a very important cultural figure since he bought twitter and made it into a right-leaning free-for-all. But he didn’t seem to have direct political ambitions for himself. He just looked to be having fun performing for the adoring MAGA crowds and Trump obviously enjoyed having the richest man in the world in his entourage.

Musk’s appearances at the rallies were cringe worthy and his speeches were anything but riveting but he put a lot of money into the campaign and launched some provocative tactics such as offering million dollar lotteries for people to sign petitions and register to vote. He apparently believed that he delivered Pennsylvania for Trump and Trump was certainly grateful for the support (although I doubt he believes anyone delivered anything but him.)

I think we all assumed that he’d go back to doing his usual thing, running his mouth on twitter and running his companies once the election was over but instead he became joined at the hip with Trump who didn’t seem to mind. Spending the transition period down in Mar-a-Lago along with businessman and now candidate for Governor of Ohio, Vivek Ramaswamy, he came up with his DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) project to cut government spending. It appeared to be just another commission to provide advice on where the cut programs, a Washington perennial that usually goes nowhere. The assumptions in those early days was that the Project 2025 people, led by soon to be Director of Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought, would be doing the dirty work such as implementing Schedule F, the order to make all federal workers into at will employees.

It soon became apparent that Musk was staying on to run this new agency while Ramaswamy was ignominiously dumped right after the inauguration, ostensibly because he wrote a very provocative post on X declaring that we needed foreign workers because America “venerated mediocrity over excellence,” which hit a nerve with the Trumpers. (Also, no one could stand him.) And I think most of us figured that he and Trump would be headed the same way in short shrift. Would Trump really want this guy around much longer, getting too much attention and waving his money around? As it turns out Trump has quite liked having the richest man in the world at his beck and call and he even puts up with his precocious little son X, who likes to tell the president to shut up during press conferences.

Musk had actually been thinking about doing something like DOGE since 2023 when he dreamed of gutting the bureaucracy by getting access to the government computers. (He may have some other motives for that as well.) Trump, who is completely ignorant about computers, gave him the keys and said to have at it and Musk and his people have been taking a chainsaw to the executive branch for three months now, causing tremendous chaos and trauma and essentially destroying much of what the American people count on their government to do.

Whatever his purpose with all this slashing and burning, he’s not getting the job he promised done. The New York Times reports:

[Musk] previously said his powerful budget-cutting team could reduce the next fiscal year’s federal budget by $1 trillion, and do it by Sept. 30, the end of the current fiscal year. Instead, in a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Mr. Musk said that he anticipated the group would save about $150 billion, 85 percent less than its objective.Even that figure may be too high, according to a New York Times analysis of DOGE’s claims.

Musk is constantly going on about this tremendous amount of fraud taking place in government programs and while his team is wrecking them quite efficiently, they aren’t actually saving any money because there actually isn’t this massive level of fraud. In fact DOGE is largely fraudulent itself. The Times reports:

 [I]t inflates its progress by including billion-dollar errors, by counting spending that will not happen in the next fiscal year — and by making guesses about spending that might not happen at all. One of the group’s largest claims, in fact, involves canceling a contract that did not exist.

If DOGE’s mission is to cut spending he’s doing a terrible job of it. If its job is to cause misery it’s a rousing success.

Meanwhile, Musk has been watching his personal fortune shrink by the day and his reputation be blown to smithereens like one of his failed starship rockets. The stock in his car company Tesla has been sliding precipitously and not just because his baby, the cybertruck, the worst failure of his career, is dragging down the whole company. (He takes great pride in saying that he did “zero market research whatsoever” and it shows.) He apparently didn’t realize that by becoming a right wing MAGA troll he would alienate the people who buy his cars — there aren’t a whole lot of EV buyers in rural America, the MAGA base.

Two weeks ago Musk found out the hard way that his money can’t buy everything. He pulled out all the stops in Wisconsin, spending tens of millions of dollars in a pivotal state Supreme Court race and lost by ten points, a much bigger loss than expected. The voters were not impressed by his antics, or his reprise of the million dollar lottery gambit.

And now he’s found himself on the other side of Trump in the big tariff debacle that tanked world markets and looks like it could easily lead to recession or worse. He’s on record saying that he tried to talk Trump out of it and was sparring with Trump’s trade adviser Peter Navarro on X , calling him a “moron” and “dumb as a sack of bricks” perhaps not realizing that Navarro is a made man who went to jail for Trump and is the only person in the world who Trump truly bonds with on this issue. Musk’s entreaties went nowhere.

So, Elon may be on his way out, finally. Polls show that only 45% of Republicans hold a favorable opinion of him. Rolling Stone reports that virtually everyone in the White House finds him irritating, some even questioning if he’s high. (His SpaceX reps deny it.) According to Puck’s Leigh Ann Caldwell, since his Wisconsin faceplant, Republicans on Capitol Hill are no longer in awe (or terrified) of him either.

Musk’s “special employee” status requires him to leave by the end of May although Trump has recently said that he would finish the DOGE mission (God help us) and we know Trump doesn’t care about rules or law so if he wants to stay, he can. But considering recent events it will not be surprising if he bows out next month on schedule. He’s not happy and Daddy Trump is always just a phone call away if he wants to chat. The long awaited Musk departure may be upon us.

Salon

Trump Declares War On Americans

Bushies declared Geneva obsolete. Trump thiunks the Constitution irrelevant.

Jonathan Last asks at The Bulwark, “If you were Chris Krebs, would you flee the country?”

Last week Donald Trump issued a presidential memorandum. This one instructs the Department of Justice et al. to launch an investigation into Chris Krebs, the former head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). His alleged crime? Testifying to the Jan. 6 Select Committee that Republican officials “lied to the American people about the security of the 2020 election.” In Trump’s telling, Krebs “falsely and baselessly denied that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen.” That is, Krebs committed HERESY by thought, heresy by word, heresy by deed, and heresy by action!

I further direct the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence, and all other relevant agencies to immediately take all action as necessary and consistent with existing law to suspend any active security clearances held by individuals at entities associated with Krebs, including SentinelOne, pending a review of whether such clearances are consistent with the national interest.

I further direct the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with any other agency head, to take all appropriate action to review Krebs’ activities as a Government employee, including his leadership of CISA.

Blah, blah, blah, hereby, blah.

Another Trumporandum targeted Miles Taylor for “his unethical laundering and release of sensitive Government data to advance his false narratives.” Meaning this NYT op-ed from 2018. (Trump would know from unethical.) Maybe Krebs and Taylor can sit together on the flight.

One might see these as more Trumpish distractions from his disastrous tariff policy. They are that, but let’s not assume Trump cannot play golf and chew gum at the same time. He came into office promising revenge. He wants it all, and he’s doing his best Queen of Hearts to get it.

Matt Ford warns at The New Republic that Trump is musing about sending Americans to a Salvadoran gulag. That would be the joint where cosplaying DHS Secretary Kristi Noem shot her propaganda ad in front of caged, mostly Venezuelan prisoners:

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also said it was under serious consideration. “The president has said if it’s legal, right, if there is a legal pathway to do that, he’s not sure,” she told reporters at a press briefing. “We are not sure if there is. It’s an idea that he has simply floated and has discussed very publicly as in the effort of transparency.” She claimed the practice would be reserved for “heinous, violent criminals who have broken our nation’s laws repeatedly.”

“Banishment” or “exile”

Heinous and violent being in the eyes of Trump himself, Krebs and Taylor (or you) ought not see themselves as exempt even from an act “flagrantly illegal and spectacularly unconstitutional.” Trump wipes his ass with the Constitution (many people are saying).

But let’s be clear with our terminology, Ford urges:

First, a word on words: Some commentators have described this potential practice as “deportation.” This is not accurate. That term only applies to the removal of noncitizens from a country or political community to which they do not legally belong. More accurate terms would be “banishment” or “exile.” For clarity’s sake, I’ll use the term banishment for removals from one U.S. state or city to another—more on that later—and the term exile for forcibly removing a U.S. citizen to another country, as Trump is mulling.

Would it be legal? Absolutely not. No law allows a federal court to sentence a defendant to serve their sentence overseas. Nor is there any statute that allows the president to unilaterally remove a U.S. citizen to another country at a whim. In the 1936 case Valentine v. United States, for example, the Supreme Court held that the president has no power to extradite a U.S. citizen to another country except when authorized by a treaty or an act of Congress.

It is insane that Ford even has to examine the case for exile:

The Supreme Court has never directly ruled on whether a U.S. citizen could be exiled to a foreign country because the federal government has never attempted it. However, the courts have operated under the assumption for at least the last 150 years that U.S. citizens cannot be denied reentry into the United States.

Which brings us back to my post below on nervousness about being able to get back into the country after leaving it. Ford cites one case from 1922 about an effort to deport Chinese Americans and other efforts from the 1960s to strip citizenship from draft-dodgers and others targeted by the government.

“We hold that the Fourteenth Amendment was designed to, and does, protect every citizen of this Nation against a congressional forcible destruction of his citizenship, whatever his creed, color, or race,” wrote Justice Hugo Black in 1967. “Our holding does no more than to give to this citizen that which is his own, a constitutional right to remain a citizen in a free country unless he voluntarily relinquishes that citizenship.”

From these cases, Ford overoptimistically believes, “we can divine a few principles. U.S. citizenship is constitutionally sacrosanct, and U.S. citizens cannot be involuntarily deprived of it.”

But those cases were based on the very same Fourteenth Amendment that Trump wants reinterpreted by a MAGA-friendly Roberts court to deny birthright citizenship to “anchor babies.” This isn’t the 20th century anymore. The Roberts court is not the Warren court. Roberts oversees the court that overturned 50 years of precedent with its Dobbs decision.

And Donald Trump is a convicted felon.

* * * * *

Have you fought autocracy today?

National Day of Action, Saturday, April 19 (Details coming; scroll for local events)
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Do You Look “American” Enough?

Congress asks Trump administration why it’s detaining Americans

Author Anand Giridharadas appearing April 8 on The Agenda with Steve Paikin of TVO (Ontario Ministry of Education).

To repeat from Sunday:

It should be lost on no one that Russian President Vladimir Putin, the former KGB officer in East Germany, is a big influence on Donald John Trump, convicted felon and corrupt businessman. The Trump administration’s crackdown started with allegedly violent undocumented immigrants. It expanded to visa-holders, work-visa-holders, and green card holders. He’s moved on to American citizens like night follows day.

ProPublica has a report again this morning about that last category:

At least a dozen members of Congress, all Democrats, have written to the Trump administration with pointed questions about constituents and other citizens whom immigration agents have questioned, detained and even held at gunpoint. In one letter, Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee demanded a list of every citizen detained during the new administration.

None has received an answer.

Of course not. Even to reply and deny would draw attention to the issue and acknowledge that Congress has oversight authority.

Last month, ProPublica reported:

The government does not release figures on citizens who have been held by immigration authorities. Neither Customs and Border Protection nor Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which handles interior immigration enforcement, would provide numbers to ProPublica on how many Americans have been mistakenly detained.

Experts and advocates say that what is clear to them is that Trump’s aggressive immigration policies — such as arrest quotas for enforcement agents — make it likely that more citizens will get caught up in immigration sweeps.

“It’s really everyone — not just noncitizens or undocumented people — who are in danger of having their liberty violated in this kind of mass deportation machinery,” said Cody Wofsy, the deputy director of the Immigrants’ Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union.

[…]

Spanning both Obama administrations, an NPR investigation found, immigration authorities asked local authorities to detain about 700 Americans. Meanwhile, a U.S. Government Accountability Office report found that immigration authorities asked to hold roughly 600 likely citizens during Trump’s first term. The GAO also found that Trump actually deported about 70 likely citizens.

The cases ProPublica recounts involve, essentially, American citizens detained for not looking “American” in the eyes of ICE: Puerto Ricans, a Mexican-American Trump voter, a Mescalero Apache, and in 2018 a man from Philadelphia thought to be Jamaican. ICE held that last man, Peter Sean Brown, for three weeks.

“As a citizen, you don’t think it is really possible, because that’s everything against what we are raised to believe that our country stands for,” Brown told the press outside a Miami federal courthouse last year. The Southern Poverty Law Center was filing a lawsuit.

Be watchful for Americans being detained at Customs when returning from a trip abroad. With this administration, one might leave for a Caribberan vacation under one set of “rules” only to find that they’ve changed (and not in a good way) by the time you return.

One of my oldest friends looks Latino. He’s not. He’s got some southern Italian in his family history. His father was on the U.S. Olympic teams in 1936 and 1948. But his look has sometimes attracted police attention since his teens. He doesn’t look “American” enough.

From December:

A friend with an Arabic name and look lives in Vermont. Someone asked him once if he ever felt threatened there. Not really, he said. Okay, now and then some a-hole will shout “Go back to where you came from!” His shrugging response is, “You want me to go back to North Dakota?”

Or in the case of Anand Girdharadas, Cleveland.

* * * * *

Have you fought autocracy today?

National Day of Action, Saturday, April 19 (Details coming; scroll for local events)
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense

Welcome To North Korea

And tens of millions of people agree with this…’

sigh

Oh Good. More Chaos And Uncertainty

About those electronics exemptions? Yeah. Not so much. Chaos is their middle name. Uncertainty is their game:

Here’s Navarro:

And Lutnick:

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Sunday that the administration’s decision Friday night to exempt a range of electronic devices from tariffs implemented earlier this month was only a temporary reprieve, with the secretary announcing that those items would be subject to “semiconductor tariffs” that will likely come in “a month or two.”

“All those products are going to come under semiconductors, and they’re going to have a special focus type of tariff to make sure that those products get reshored. We need to have semiconductors, we need to have chips, and we need to have flat panels — we need to have these things made in America. We can’t be reliant on Southeast Asia for all of the things that operate for us,” Lutnick told “This Week” co-anchor Jonathan Karl.

He continued, “So what [President Donald Trump‘s] doing is he’s saying they’re exempt from the reciprocal tariffs, but they’re included in the semiconductor tariffs, which are coming in probably a month or two. So these are coming soon.”

They can’t help themselves.

Bill Maher Is Dead To Me

Again

Maher had dinner with Trump (and Kid Rock) and says he couldn’t have been more wonderful:

“You can hate me for it, but I’m not a liar. Trump was gracious and measured,” Maher said. “And why isn’t that in other settings- I don’t know, and I can’t answer, and it’s not my place to answer. I’m just telling you what I saw, and I wasn’t high.”

The comedian showed up a printout of dozens of insults the president has thrown his way over the years, including calling him a “sleazebag,” “stone cold crazy,” a “really dumb guy,” and more. Maher revealed that Trump actually signed the list.

The Real Time host said he did not receive pushback from Trump when questioning some of his positions, and he was also shocked to hear Trump admit he “lost” the 2020 presidential election.

“I never felt I had to walk on eggshells around him. And, honestly, I voted for Clinton and Obama, but I would never feel comfortable talking to them the way I was able to talk with Donald Trump. That’s just how it went down. Make of it what you will. Me? I feel it’s emblematic of why the Democrats are so unpopular these days,” Maher said.

At one point during the dinner, Maher confronted Trump and accused him of “scaring” his own citizens too much with talk of a third term and more.

“At one point, I said to him, ‘you’re scaring people. Do you really want to be scaring your own citizens so much?,’” he recalled. “And I know now you’re all saying, ‘and what did he say to that?’ Honestly, I don’t remember. But it wasn’t, okay, I’ll stop. So MAGA fans, don’t worry. Your boy gave me nothing, just hats. Hats in a very generous amount of time and a willingness to listen and accept me as a possible friend, even though I’m not MAGA, which was the point of the dinner.”

Gag. As one of the guests on his show said, “it was nothing but PR for him and you were his prop.”

Pathetic.

Don’t watch it if you’ve just had your lunch.

He’s Falling

But not far enough

And yet…

Yes, it’s dropping. But considering that we are supposed to believe that the only thing that matters to Americans is the economy you’d think it would have dropped a lot further by now. Those numbers suggest that the only people who are having second thoughts about him are those who didn’t vote for him but gave him the benefit of the doubt when he took office. That’s not going to be enough to slow him down.

At this point I am just very grateful to the financial markets for at least having a sense of self-preservation if nothing else. It’s the only thing that seems to have been able to make Trump change course.

Junior Plays Doctor

You probably read the headline this week that said Bobby Jr. endorsed the measles vaccine and encouraged people to get them. According to jonathan Cohn at the The Bulwark, there’s more to the story:

If you clicked through and actually watched the full interview, you quickly discovered he was giving his endorsement grudgingly, following repeated prompts from interviewer Dr. Jon LaPook. And when he was eventually unable to avoid answering, Kennedy framed his endorsement as a description of official HHS posture rather than a personal belief. “The federal government’s position, my position, is that people should get the measles vaccine,” he said.

Kennedy then proceeded to claim, as he had so many times before, that “we don’t know the risks of many of these products because they’re not safety tested.” That’s not true; vaccines go through extensive safety testing. And in the case of the MMR vaccine, there is now also more than a half-century of widespread clinical use—amounting to a real-world track record of several hundred million doses, giving a very clear safety picture.

Kennedy also claimed that a particular type of vaccine, those that target one rather than multiple proteins on a germ, have “never worked” for respiratory disease. That’s also not true; multiple vaccines work that way.

All of this was after an extended exchange in which RFK suggested that the second Texas girl who died may have been a victim of some other illness: “She had extreme tonsillectomy . . . she was graph positive for bacteria in her bloodstream.”

“All of those are medical words,” Brown University professor Dr. Craig Spencer told me in an interview, referring to Kennedy’s invocation of an “extreme tonsillectomy” (which is not a standard medical term; it’s unclear whether he meant “radical tonsillectomy” or “an extreme case of tonsillitis”) and “graph positive” (the actual term is “Gram positive”). “It doesn’t mean that they actually reflect the reality of the medical case.”

He’s one of those fools who doesn’t understand that if you get pneumonia as a result of measles/COVID/whatever and die it still means you died of the disease. And he’s like a little kid playing doctor, throwing around terms he clearly doesn’t understand.

Cohn notes that Kennedy is promoting his “Make America Healthy Again” program touting diet and exercise and “and ridding the air, water, and food supplies of toxins” which I’m fairly sure his boss Donald “beautiful clean coal” Trump isn’t exactly on board with. But as he’s doing his health tour, he’s literally destroying the HHS. And the destruction is overwhelming.

Starting with the overall 25% reduction in force, it only gets worse. Research grants are down 60 percent from last year. And it’s so chaotic that it’s almost impossible to know exactly where and how it’s happening because there’s no transparency. The only way we know any of it is through various news stories making it hard to see the whole picture.

Cohn points out that this isn’t just Kennedy but rather a truly unfortunate combination of DOGE, the assault on universities and the lingering effects of the backlash against public health from both right and left in the wake of the pandemic (which is just plain infuriating.) But there literally couldn’t be a worse choice to head HHS than Kennedy and his henchmen at the various agencies appear to be just as fringe. The loss of expertise that’s happening in staggering.

I heard Cory Booker, a politician I have always admired, on Stephen Colbert last week and he talked a lot about how we had to forgive and make “good trouble” and his whole schtick is inspiring. But when asked about what’s happening under the Trump administration he’s clearly gotten the memo that Democrats need to focus intently on the kitchen table issues of the economy and health care by which they obviously mean mainly jobs and health insurance.

As I listened to it, I closed my eyes and could have sworn it was an indictment of the GOP from 2007. It sounded so stale even my eyes glazed over. And he’s not the only one. It’s all tired old Democratic talking points we’ve heard a million times.

If they want to talk about kitchen table issues, how about getting a little bit specific? The fact that Trump and Kennedy are destroying cancer and Alzheimer’s research? Demonizing vaccines so that kids are dying? Ending HIV and other communicable disease programs around the world? How Trump wants to raise the price of imported drugs? I don’t know about you but those are things that hit the kitchen table pretty hard when you or someone in your family gets sick.

This is a massive, national disaster, one of the worst things Trump is doing, and I don’t think most people know about it. The Democrats haven’t started to talk about it in a way that will register the scope of the horror. They need to start now because it takes a while for anything to penetrate through the cacophony of the Trump hellscape.

Your Are Leaving The American Sector

Making popular what needs to be said

[Checkpoint in West Berlin, West Germany with sign “You are leaving the American Sector” in four languages] / TOH. Photo by Thomas J. O’Halloran, 1961 (via Library of Congress).

A couple of comments heard on Saturday.

The first was from a friend who teaches a political science class for local seniors. There is fear in their eyes, he said.

The second was from a retired Democratic official who asked if I’d heard the comment that while Democrats were buying TV ads, Republicans were buying TV stations. I had.

With those quotes in mind, let’s look at Dan Pfeiffer’s post today. It should be lost on no one that Russian President Vladimir Putin, the former KGB officer in East Germany, is a big influence on Donald John Trump, convicted felon and corrupt businessman. The Trump administration’s crackdown started with allegedly violent undocumented immigrants. It expanded to visa-holders, work-visa-holders, and green card holders. He’s moved on to American citizens like night follows day.

Pfeiffer writes (there appears to be no paywall):

Last week in the Oval Office, surrounded by his cabinet and the media, President Donald Trump signed two executive orders that instructed his Department of Justice to investigate two individuals for the crime of criticizing the regime. Miles Taylor is a former Trump staffer who anonymously wrote an op-ed criticizing Trump before going public and becoming a vocal critic of Trump. Christopher Krebs was a cybersecurity official in the first Trump Administration who dared to push back on the big lie that the 2020 election was stolen.

There’s no inkling or evidence that either committed any crime. No allegation, no probable cause. All they did was publicly criticize the President of the United States. For 250 years, being free to criticize those in power was fundamental to our democracy. Not anymore. Not with Trump back in the White House.

Wonder why those seniors are worried? If this were happening in another country, we would see it for what it is, Pfeiffer laments, a “democracy falling into dictatorship.” But a lot of Americans are in see-no-evil mode when it comes to the land of the free.

Democrats, for their part, are hung up on the price of eggs and hold onto kitchen table issues like a security blanket while treating “voters who care about democracy” as “college-educated political junkies” already on our team.

There are powerful survey tools out there now that “tell us what voters already care about. Perhaps the question Democrats should ask is, what do we want them to care about?”

“Voters are not sufficiently alarmed by American democracy crumbling,” he adds. “Instead of accepting that premise, Democrats should try to change it.”

Or as Anat Shenker-Osorio complained years ago, “Democrats rely on polling to take the temperature; Republicans use polling to change it.” For us, good messaging is not about saying what is popular, it is about making popular what needs to be said.

The U.S. turning into East Germany just might fit that latter category. While admitting some biases and possible errors, Pfeiffer makes a stab at what’s next:

  1. No Fear: Senator Chris Murphy is one of few Democrats who have taken up this mantle. Despite a very successful record as a senator, Murphy was largely unknown only a few months ago. His national profile has grown significantly because he has become a Paul Revere of sorts — clearly and authentically explaining what Trump is doing and why it’s dangerous. He is sincere. Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have taken a different approach, talking about the dangers of Trump through a class prism. Once again, it’s authentic.
    What do these messages have in common with each other — and with Obama in 2008? They are told without fear or political calculus. These are scary times; and Democrats seem more scared of their own shadow than whatever Trump is doing.
  1. Don’t Try to Fuse Two Messages Together: The worst decision in politics is no decision. Pick a lane. Some of the Democratic messaging has been too cute by half. When Trump pardoned the January 6th rioters, Democratic politicians flooded Twitter with things like “Pardoning rioters does nothing to lower the price of eggs.” You can see how they got to this point. The communications director says we have to talk about what’s in the news to get coverage and the pollster says high egg prices are a top concern. Voila, a terrible message. Pardoning violent criminals who beat police officers is bad enough. No need to inauthentically tie it to egg prices.
  2. Corruption Explains Everything: Democrats can’t abandon talking about the economy, but we can’t also stand by silently as Trump shreds the Constitution. The best way to do both is to explain why Trump is abridging people’s rights, weaponizing government, punishing speech, and pushing through his agenda without regard for the courts or Congress, all in service of the ultra-wealthy and politically connected. It’s a government of, by, and for the billionaires. Nothing and no one else matters. They are the ones who will get the tax cuts, the handouts, and the preferential treatment. It’s pay to play, and only the wealthiest of Americans can afford it.
    Everyone else must fend for themselves. Trump will destroy every entity and institution that stands in the way of his power. The more power he has, the better things will be for Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and the rest of the oligarchs ruling America.
  3. Running on a Reform Agenda: This is easier said than done, but Democrats need to do more than identify the problem. We need solutions. We need a reform agenda to address money in politics and corporate influence in government. We also need to ensure that someone like Trump can never again muster such an assault on our system. In the coming weeks and months, I will be writing more about what our reform agenda could look like, but there is no question in my mind that we need one. Having a plan to fix a broken system is the best way to avoid becoming the defenders of the broken system.

So now what? So now change it.

The trick is, as my friend observed, while Democrats were buying TV ads, Republicans were buying TV stations. Having a good message is one thing. Getting voters to hear it in this media environment is another. The left still has a “tree falls in the forest” problem.

* * * * *

Have you fought autocracy today?

National Day of Action, Saturday, April 19 (Details coming; scroll for local events)
The Resistance Lab
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink
You Have Power
Chop Wood, Carry Water
Thirty lonely but beautiful actions
Attending a Protest Surveillance Self-Defense