The cacophony of political news is deafening. But Democrats have got to decide on a few simple phrases to say in unison and repeat cover and over again.
This is from “The Frame Lab” newsletter and I think it’s a step in the right direction:
Democrats face three immediate challenges:
Grabbing the public’s attention
Hammering the right frame
Repeating it over and over again
Data for Progress, a progressive polling firm, suggests that framing Musk’s actions as “stealing from you” resonates strongly with voters. From Data for Progress:
Additionally, while saying DOGE will cut programs to “give tax breaks to giant corporations and billionaires like Musk” effectively decreases DOGE’s favorability, a message that combines “steal from you” and “give tax breaks” has an even greater negative impact on voters’ opinion on DOGE, particularly among Independents whose views on DOGE shifted 14 points more unfavorably on net with the combined message.
I believe the frame of “theft” can also unite us as a country against intruders who unjustly take our shared treasure and threaten our prosperity. The core message remains: the wealthiest man in the country is trying to steal what belongs to every American. He doesn’t need anything, yet he’s still pilfering from those who need it most.
I would combine that with “Nobody voted for Musk” which gives some wobbly Trump voters the ability to turn on the agenda without admitting they were dupes which seems to be very difficult for them to do. (MAGA means never having to say you’re sorry…)
Focusing on Musk right now in these early days makes the most sense. He’s not popular and he’s acting like a crazy man.
I have often noticed that the MAGA wingnuts believe that almost everyone in the country (except for trans kids, feminists and Black women) actually agrees with them but all the cheating and rigging is keeping the massive MAGA majority from being heard.
Well, today it was revealed that Politico missed a payroll because of a technical glitch and they decided that it was because USAID is funding the liberal media.
The White House “confirmed” it (probably through reading Twitter trolls) the same way they have confirmed that USAID spent $50 million or $100 million on condoms in Gaza.
According to Fox, Politico has received $8million from the feds over the years for something, but only $44,000 from USAID.
That news morphed into this:
Look who endorses this daft idea:
It’s one big simulation put together by our Martian overlords to keep us happy while they rape our children and drink our blood.
Donald Trump and his family have clearly had their eyes on the real estate development possibilities in the Gaza strip for quite some time. Last March, son-in-law Jared Kushner, the president’s middle east adviser (among a dozen different things) in his first term, told the Harvard School of Government that “Gaza’s waterfront property could be very valuable” and suggested that Israel should “move the people out and then clean it up.” On Inauguration day, Donald Trump himself said, “It’s a phenomenal location. On the sea, the best weather, some beautiful things could be done with it. Some fantastic things could be done with Gaza.” Add on a golf course and you’ve got Trump Gaza Golf Resort to go with the new Trump Tower in Jeddah Saudi Arabia and peace will be at hand in the Middle East at long last.
Fortunately for Trump Israel has already done the demolition work for them so it’s just that sticky matter of getting rid of the people who live there. Kushner alluded to it in his talk but it wasn’t until after the campaign that Trump shared his thoughts on how to deal with that. On January 21st on Air force One, Trump told the assembled press corp that he’s spoke with the king of Jordan and asked him to “take” at least some of the Palestinians who live in Gaza and then “we just clean out that whole thing.” That language was just a tiny bit provocative seeing as ethnic cleansing is considered a crime against humanity.
It was clear then that Trump had the brilliant idea all by himself that the Palestinians should just move someplace else which he seemed to think was the obvious “final solution” to the vexing problem which no one had ever thought of before. Yesterday, he announced his fully formed plan, first in one of his Executive Order signing sessions and later in a press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Answering reporters’ questions in the signing sessions he went on at some length about how Gaza has been decimated and it’s unsanitary to live there so the Palestinians will be happy to move someplace else where they can have nice houses, to be built by the other rich Arab countries. He claimed that the only reason the Palestinians stayed in Gaza was because they had no other alternative so if Egypt and Jordan offer them land in their countries, they’ll be “thrilled” to go. When a reporter noted that Egypt and Jordan had both bluntly said no to this idea, he noted that Venezuela and Panama had originally said no to him but now they’re doing as they’re told so we can expect every other country to do the same.
So that was pretty weird. But it was nothing to what he said at the press conference with Netanyahu a short while later. He repeated his belief that the Palestinians should be forcibly moved to somewhere, but added a stunning embellishment that nobody saw coming. Standing next to the Prime Minister of Israel who nodded along like a demented marionette, Trump said that the US would take over the Gaza strip and assume a “long term ownership position.”
He says that the US will level it and then build new buildings that will supply jobs for the people of the area. Not Palestinians, though. They’ll be living in their beautiful piece of land (or pieces, as many as 10 or 12) in other countries.
According to Trump, this has been discussed at length and that everyone loves the idea of the United States owning that land and developing it into something magnificent.
When asked what he envisions for the place, it sounds as though he really does see it as some kind of international resort where “world people” will come.
And for the piece de resistance after going on and on for years about America First and not wanting to get involved in “forever wars”, he just committed sending US troops into the most fraught forever war on the planet.
Trump insisted in his remarks earlier that Saudi Arabia and other Arab states are on board but that’s not true. According to CNN, “Saudi Arabia reaffirmed its “unwavering” support for a Palestinian state, and two Arab officials expressed puzzlement and concern, telling CNN it was “hard to grasp and digest.” After all, they have citizens too. As the Washington Post reported, “it would be politically destabilizing in Egypt and Jordan, where leaders fear that any influx of Palestinians would be met with sharp anger because of the appearance of collaborating with Israel.”
Netanyahu said that Trump “sees a different future for that piece of land. It’s worth paying attention to this. We’re talking about it. It’s something that could change history.” Not exactly a full endorsement but you could certainly see why it would appeal to him. Get rid of the Palestinians (the West Bank is on the menu too) and have the US military guard the area for him while they rebuild it into a new home for the Israeli settlers. What’s not to like?
This all fits with Trump’s other delusions of grandeur around seizing Greenland, making Canada into the 51st state, invading Mexico and/or Panama that he’s been talking about non-stop since he was inaugurated. This latest, with its sanctimony about it being done for the good of the Palestinians and to bring peace to the region brought back some very unpleasant memories of the days when the Republicans sold the Iraq war as a crusade to create a Jeffersonian Democracy in the middle east. This cheap real estate pitch (it will be the Riviera of the Middle East!) doesn’t have quite the same lofty ideals but it amounts to the same thing. We all know how that turned out.
Trump bleats about “peace” all the time because he’s determined to win himself the Nobel Peace Prize (maybe two so he can beat Obama.) But he’s anything but a pacifist. Observing his behavior for all these years leaves no doubt about the man’s propensity for domination and violence and the first couple of weeks of his presidency illustrates it more clearly than ever.
It’s hard to imagine that he will actually be able to do any of this. It’s yet another absurd declaration by a man whose ability to escape any accountability for his crimes has led him to believe he’s got superpowers. More likely it will simply result in the breakdown of the fragile ceasefire and more punishment for the Palestinians along with more uncertainty and distrust among America’s allies.
His vainglorious pronouncements of territorial expansion and manifest destiny are making the whole world fear not that he’s going to succeed in any of these crazy schemes but that he’s going to truly lose it and make a catastrophic decision. Everyone knows that as demented as he sounds half the time, he’s still the guy with the nuclear codes.
Democrats play for Team USA. Republicans won’t even play for their home team.
Elon Musk and his Elonjungen busted into USAID headquarters last week and illegally shuttered the foreign aid agency that for 60 years has been a key instument for projecting U.S. soft power in the world. He found and posted a list of small-dollar grants supporting mainly diversity-related projects he declared “waste and abuse,” lefty boondoggles proving that USAID had to die. The cited items amount to not even a fraction of a percent of the agency’s $40 billion budget.
On that basis, the unelected Musk declared the agency “a criminal organization” and shuttered its operations around the world.
How many quirky, objectionable line items might be found among the Pentagon’s $800 billion budget? (The public budget, that is, not the “black budget.”) A similar fraction? Similar enough and thus substantially more in dollar sums that means the Pentagon has to die?
Has anyone looked? Just asking. When was the last time the Pentagon passed an audit? Oh, never.
Politco suggests Democrats are walking into a trap by defending USAID from Musk’s predations. Foreign aid being one of taxpayers’ least favorite budget expenditures. But they needen’t defend the few projects Musk pulled out as public embarrassments. What they need to defend is the projection of U.S. soft power in an age of increasing great-power competition:
Republicans had long been proponents of exerting “soft power” — winning global hearts and minds by feeding the hungry, fostering emerging economies and getting vaccines to the most vulnerable populations. China, notably, stands ready to fill the void.
A bit over six months ago, President Biden’s June 27 debate with Donald Trump went badly for him. Embarrassingly badly. He looked old, frail. He lost his train of thought. How long had his staff been covering for him? Everyone wanted to know. It was its own mini scandal and led to Biden dropping out of the race a few weeks later. The country elected Donald Trump instead in November.
Then Trump on Tuesday declared in a press conference that the United States would ethnically cleanse 1.8 million Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, take “a long-term ownership position” there, and develop the beachfront into a series of Trump-branded resorts. (Trump’s ownership stake was implied.)
“Everybody I’ve spoken to [inside his demented head] loves the idea of the United States owning that piece of land” and developing it, Trump told a roomful of reporters. It would create thousands of new jobs and be “magnificent,” Trump continued. “The Riviera of the Middle East.”
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel praised Trump’s “willingness to think outside the box,” reports Peter Baker of the New York Times.
Not one reporter jumped up and asked the obvious question. “Mr. President, are you out of your fucking mind?”
Al Jazeera has a flood of reaction from the people Trump means to relocate. “Ridiculous and absurd,” “a serious violation of international law,” “a dangerous escalation,” and a raft of carefully worded no-comments from allies and condemnation from adversaries. A UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territory called Trump’s proposal “unlawful, immoral and completely irresponsible.”
A MAGA Republican would respond, “And your point is?”
Christian nationalists will start packing for the Rapture.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for Trump’s inner circle to give the 25th Amendment a test drive. They are as unbalanced as their boss. Trump put a reported alcoholic Christian nationalist in charge of the Pentagon, nominated a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist to run the FBI, a suspected Russian asset for national security director, and a worm-addled vaccine skeptic to run the Department of Health and Human Services.
Don’t expect anyone to hound Republicans to ask how long they’ve been covering for a madman.
And don’t expect Republican leaders in Congress to stroll down to the White House and insist Trump resign. Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), a physician, voted Tuesday to advance RFK Jr.’s nomination out of committee.
Oh, and Trump would send U.S. troops to backstop his beachfront development project. How many are willing to give their lives in a criminal effort to develop Trump’s next golf resort?
My mind this morning is swimming with scenes of comic fictional madmen. Esposito from Bananas insisting everyone change their underwear every half-hour; General Turgidson from Dr. Strangelove guaranteeing that winning a nuclear war wouldn’t kill more than ten to twenty million Americans, tops; General Garcia from The In-Laws talking to his hand puppet, Señor Pepe, and showing off his black velvet art collection; or Firesign Theater’s general claiming the fried eggs on his plate are flying saucers. At least in the last example, an aide has the presence to ask, “Ah, sir? Are you nuts?”
Not one reporter did yesterday.
Trump Gaza Resorts. They’ll be magnificent. Buy now. Get in on the subterranean floor.
That image invokes another Firesign bit. “This is a line of Indians leaving Rancho Malario. To make room for you! Here’s the beautiful Trail of Tears Golf Course…”
This is what happens when I’m offline for an hour.
Brian Beutler has some useful thoughts on how to focus as we confront this complicated crisis. He writes:
To my mind we have four main kinds of provocation raining down on us: headfakes, attacks on liberal pluralism, policy sabotage, and genuine constitutional crises.
In the headfakes category he has Greenland, The Panama Canal and other grandiose ideas that may or may not happen or could just as easily be like the 25% tariffs which make a big splash but end up just being PR moves for Trump to declare victory.
The attacks on liberal pluralism are all the heinous assaults on DEI, transgender kids, immigrants etc which makes us want to scream but which he says, and I think he’s right, still fit into the category of normal politics even though they are grotesque, cruel and disgusting which is not unprecedented. He says, and he’s right about this too, that a lot of this is bait to make us focus on that while they destroy the very firmament of our government and democracy. And these are all wedge issues designed to create division among Democrats.
The policy sabotage is something he thinks that elected Democrats are well-equipped to focus on and it’s what they’re good at (if they want to be.) I could see the House Democrats just calling a complete halt to any negotiations over the budget and debt ceiling. He writes:
Policy sabotage refer to things Trump is doing, or intends to do, to upset the applecart domestically and internationally, in ways that are much stickier. Here in the U.S., that’s punishing blue states after natural disasters, angling to kick millions of people off Medicaid, pitting his supporters against the rest of America, further curtailing reproductive freedom etc. Internationally it’s threatening or imposing tariffs on certain allies, rattling his saber at others, undermining NATO. Much of this is improper, irregular, corrupt. But most of it is legal.
To illustrate the point about overlap, culture-war provocations can veer into policy sabotage easily. When smearing immigrants becomes the Laken Riley Act, it transforms into a rooted policy booby trap; if the government really does build a concentration camp in Guantanamo, and begins to fill it with people, that’s no longer simply psychological warfare against liberals.
Generally, though, this is where Democrats in Congress feel most comfortable. It’s where Trump’s antics show up in grocery prices and service outages and health care access. It’s where Republicans in Congress feel wedged themselves. It’s already the source of real misgivings among marginal Trump voters.
That’s the electoral side of this which is extremely important since we have to hope that the system holds up enough for Democrats to take back at least one house of Congress in 2026.
And then there’s the Constitutional crisis:
To the extent Trump is trying to sap our attention with assaults on pluralism, it’s so that he can get away with dictatorial abuses of power. Trump, and his main benefactor Elon Musk have been on a constitutional crime spree. They have violated civil-service laws and laws governing the expenditure of congressionally appropriated funds. Trump has already effectively ended politically-independent federal law enforcement and has expressed a desire to do something similar with respect to the military officer corps. His apparent goal is to be able to sic federal cops on his elite enemies, and sic federal troops on larger populations of nameless immigrants and protesters.
Ed Martin, the insurrectionist defense lawyer Trump appointed to be the acting U.S. Attorney in Washington, DC, has threatened to prosecute people for publicly identifying the young, far-right Musk acolytes (now government employees)currently rifling through government payments and sensitive records and rewriting the code base for critical government IT systems. A real assault on the first amendment, not the fake kind MAGA posters are always whining about.
This is where Democrats are least surefooted, for reasons I explained here and in other articles, but where resistance is most urgent. It’s where we have to expect Democrats to set aside proximate concerns about the next election to honor their oaths to protect the Constitution. It’s why I’ve written that Democrats should withhold votes for all must-pass budget legislation until rule of law is restored, and ideally until the Justice Department appoints a real special counsel to investigate the crimes committed in this blizzard of corruption.
He says this is why it’s important to exhort Democrats to take this up. It’s worth calling, faxing, marching, rallying all of that.
He acknowledges that the Democrats are finally responding. Brian Schatz’s leadership on stopping the USAID atrocity and Hakeem Jeffries’ plan to obstruct the budget deal are steps in the right direction. Today elected Democrats held a big rally at the Treasury Department around the slogan “Who Elected Musk?!” which I think is very useful. It serves two purposes: reminding people that we didn’t elect this billionaire Bond villain and reminding Trump that he’s being upstaged by this freak.
Musk could be the future of MAGA if he wants it. He could be the successor to Trump. It would be a huge mistake to let him destroy the constitution and remake the country in his image.
I think we have to do everything. But Beutler is right that the one thing that may not be reversible is the assault on the Constitution. Keeping a special focus on that is job one.
“He’s doing exactly what he should be doing,” Florida Sen. Rick Scott said Monday night. “He’s going through every agency and looking at how to make sure the money’s spent right.”
Wait, isn’t that explicitly the role of Congress?
“It doesn’t look like Congress is doing their job,” Scott answered simply.
And sure, there may be a little bit of Constitutional hanky-panky but it’s really no biggie:
North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis, even acknowledged that what Musk is doing is unconstitutional — but “nobody should bellyache about that.”
“That runs afoul of the Constitution in the strictest sense,” Tillis said. But “it’s not uncommon for presidents to flex a little bit on where they can spend and where they can stop spending.”
They all seem completely unworried about the fact that the un-elected billionaire drug-addled freak Elon Musk has sent in a bunch of little kids to mess around with the computer systems because they are “holding people accountable.” You can’t make this up:
“The actions that have been taken with USAID are long overdue,” Sen. Bill Hagerty said. “The agency is out of control.”
And Sen. John Hoeven said “they need to be accountable.”
“They’re somehow operating like they’re this independent agency doing their own thing,” he claimed.
Who’s operating like an independent agency? WTF???
Here’s Senator Cornpone Leghorn:
“Mr. Musk is acting under the authority of the president of the United States,” Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana told reporters. “It’s perfectly legal, perfectly constitutional. And the issue, anyway, is not process. The issue is substance. Did they find wasteful spending, or not?”
It is not legal. And Musk’s idea of “finding wasteful spending” is to say that USAIF must die. very thoughtful.
It’s all perfectly fi9ne:
“He’s working with the president, and they’re making recommendations in some cases on agencies,” South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds told NOTUS. “But the whole program here is that we’re spending way more money than what we’re bringing in.”
Nope, that’s not true. Musk is operating independently doing whatever he wants while the orange dementia patient in the White House is ordering the Corps of Engineers to waste 2 billion gallons of water in California because he can’t understand how anything works.
They are completely in the tank. And at the risk of repeating the most boring comment in the world — imagine what they would be saying if Joe Biden or Barack Obama did this?
As one reader said to me today, “this is the continuation of the January 6th attempted coup.” This is correct. And the Republicans in the Congress are all in.
Today Trump is meeting with Netanyahu and took some questions beforehand about Gaza during his daily Executive Order pageant. Once again he endorsed ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, saying that they will be happy to go in “large groups or many smaller groups” to some pieces of beautiful pieces of land where Saudi Arabia and others (not the US!) will build them some nice condos and everyone will live happily ever after.
He has the mind of a child. Here is the full exchange:
Trump: I’d like to see Jordan or Egypt take them. Look, the Gaza thing has not worked, it’s never worked and I feel very differently about Gaza than a lot of people. I think they should get a good fresh beautiful piece of land and we get some people to put up the money to build it and make it nice and make it habitable and enjoyable and make it a home.
Palestinians say they don’t want to leave though.I don’t know how they could want to stay. It’s a demolition site. If we could find the right piece of land or numerous pieces of land and build them some really nice with plenty of money in the area that’s for sure. I think that would be a lot better than going back to Gaza, which had just decades and decades of death.
Reporter: Where would those pieces of land be?
Well that could be in Jordan and they could be in Egypt and they could be in other places. You could have more than two more than one but you could have more than two you’d have people living in a place that could be very beautiful and safe and nice. Gaza has been a disaster for decades.
Reporter: Would the US pay for that?
I don’t think we would pay. But there are plenty of people that would in the are .that have a lot of money. They certainly have a lot of money. Some of the countries over they’d like to see it. I know that Saudi Arabia wants to see peace, I can see and many of the countries there as far as I’m concerned, they all want peace.
Reporter: But the leaders of Egypt and Jordan have bluntly said they want no part of this
Well, they may have said that but a lot of people said things to me. They said they wouldn’t take anybody back in Venezuela, and right now they’re flying them right back to Venezuela nad a lot of people and they’re doing the right thing in Venezuela. The Panama canal is in active discussion right now. And they said things about that. And virtually everything that’s been said has been incorrectly stated based on the result.
Reporter: Wouldn’t that amount to forcibly displacing displacing those people from Gaza?
I don’t think so. I think if they had the opportunity they love if they had an alternative. They have no alternative right now. I mean, they’re there because they have no alternative. What do they have? It’s a big pile of rubble right now, I mean have you seen the pictures of it?Have you been there? It’s terrible to live. Who can live like that? And very dangerous as there’s shooting all over the place. There’s bombing all over the place on both sides, Now, I would think if they had an option of moving to an area either in a large group or various smaller groups and take care of the close to million people I would think that they would be thrilled to do it. They have no, you know, when you say about the Gaza strip they don’t have an option.
Reporter: To be clear, you’re saying they’d be thrilled to leave Gaza.
Oh I think they’d love to if they had an option, Right now they don’t have an option. What are they going to do? They have to go back to Gaza. But what is Gaza. There’s practically not a building standing and they’re very dangerous. You know, those buildings are shifting and they’re falling down all over. And there’s gunfire all over. It’s going to be that way for a while.
Gosh, why are there gunfire and demolished buildings all over the place? Nobody bothered to ask him. I actually would have been interested in hearing what he said about that.
I could go on and on about this but I don’t think it’s necessary. It’s clear that he’s just a moron who has no understanding of … well, anything … and he has come up with what he thinks is the brilliant idea of forcing millions of people to migrate to some other place . Apparently he has absolutely no knowledge of the history of the Palestinian people — or the Jewish people, for that matter. It’s just taken as a given that Gaza (and, apparently, the West bank) should be cleansed of Palestinians for the benefit of the Israelis.
But then, he is very, very stupid and even more addled than he used to be.
As tents went up in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to hold migrants, attorneys at the Department of Homeland Security and Pentagon were still trying to determine whether it was legal to take the unprecedented step of flying migrants from the US southern border to the facility, according to two US officials and a person familiar with the planning.
On Tuesday, a military flight carrying migrants was headed to Guantanamo Bay, according to one of the officials. It was carrying around 10 migrants with criminal records, according to a Homeland Security official.
[…]
The source familiar with the plan said questions like how long the migrants can legally be held there, and what their rights would be while detained, are still unanswered. It is also unclear whether the migrants will have any access to legal or social services while detained at the base.
Senior Trump officials have continued to tout the plan, casting it as a facility designed for criminals.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio left El Salvador on Tuesday with an agreement from that country’s president to accept deportees from the U.S. of any nationality, including violent American criminals now imprisoned in the United States.
President Nayib Bukele “has agreed to the most unprecedented, extraordinary, extraordinary migratory agreement anywhere in the world,” Rubio said after meeting with Bukele at his lakeside country house outside San Salvador for several hours late Monday.
“We can send them, and he will put them in his jails,” Rubio said of migrants of all nationalities detained in the United States. “And, he’s also offered to do the same for dangerous criminals currently in custody and serving their sentences in the United States even though they’re U.S. citizens or legal residents.”
They’ll take American citizens too? How generous! Now Trump can say that he’s emptying out our prisons just as he claims all the other countries are doing. I can’t see what would stop him.
CNN did a big story on the Salvadoran prisons pictured above. They are full of gang members after a crackdown by the new authoritarian regime that’s pretty much turned the country into a police state. They house about 80 prisoners to a cell and they get 30 minutes of group exercise a day.
You know that Trump will be thrilled to send people (including Americans) there and will want to watch videos of their punishing treatment late at night when he’s all alone.
The freeze is still on, at least in some places. Republicans have learned that the courts have no power to top anything, not even a blatantly criminal president who stole classified documents and refused to give them back. So issuing a “restraining order” is a nice symbolic act but I’m not sure anyone thinks it means much anymore. Once you take a wrecking ball to every norm and law in the country you end up standing on the courthouse steps saying “Yeah? You and what army?” and the whole thing falls apart.
One week after the Trump administration ordered a pause on federal grants and loans, many Head Start programs in Wisconsin are still unable to access needed funds and are facing uncertainty about whether they can stay open.
While the White House publicly rescinded the memo announcing the freeze, nonprofit organizations around the state are reporting they remain locked out of the payment systems that they use to pay staff and keep operations running.
“I’m hearing from people all across the country and here in Wisconsin that they’re still impacted by the freeze,” Shawn Phetteplace told WPR’s “Wisconsin Today.” “There’s a lot of confusion about this right now, but if you talk to Head Starts, if you talk to child care providers … they’re still frozen out, and they can’t access the funds.”
There’s always the possibility that Musk and his little page boys have decided that a restraining order against the OMB freeze doesn’t apply to the payment system which they apparently now control?
Tim Nolan, who runs the program, told “Wisconsin Today” he received a notice from the Office of Management and Budget, or OMB, last Monday, directing the center to shut down by the end of the day on Tuesday.
“When OMB asks, you do it,” he said. “So we did as we were told to do on Tuesday, which was shut down.”
Later, when he followed up about the status of the funding freeze, Nolan was told programs like Head Start and Meals on Wheels would not be affected. But since then, he said the payment management system of the U.S. Treasury, which he uses to request funds for things like rent and payroll, has not been working.
While funding requests normally take only two to three days to process, Nolan said a request he made last Tuesday is still “pending review.” And unless the issues with the payment management system are resolved quickly, he won’t be able to pay his staff on time.
Feature, not bug I’m guessing although it’s always possible that they’ve just fucked something up.
It seems to me that it’s pretty important that the word goes forth that this stuff is happening because of Donald Trump and Elon Musk. To the extent people are talking about it is it penetrating or do most people just think this is all a bunch of white noise at best and as sign of Trump and Musk’s awesome power to destroy the status quo so we can all get rich at worst? I suspect there’s more of the latter than we like to think. If you look at the right wing media and the alternative media that people seem to rely on like Joe Rogan, they are very, very stoked about Musk taking over the government and making as many federal workers suffer as humanly possible.