Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

Corporate cosmology: Criterion reissues “Network” (****)

Right now, the Arabs have screwed us out of enough American dollars to come right back and with our own money buy General Moters, IBM, ITT, AT&T, DuPont, US Steel, and 20 other American companies. Hell, they already own half of England! So, listen to me. Listen to me, God damn it. The Arabs are simply buying us! There’s only one thing that can stop them. You! You!I want you to get up out of your chairs. I want you to get up right now and go to the phone. I want you to get up from your chairs, go to the phone and get in your cars, drive into the Western Union offices in town. I want you to send a telegram to the White House… By midnight tonight, I want a million telegrams at the White House. I want them wading, knee-deep in telegrams at the White House. I want you to get up right now and write a telegram to President Ford saying, “I’m as mad as Hell and I’m not gonna take this anymore! I don’t want the banks selling my country to the Arabs. I want the CCA deal stopped! Now! I want the CCA deal stopped! Now!”

– Howard Beale, from Sidney Lumet’s Network (1976); screenplay by Paddy Chayefsky

This just in:

Last night [President Trump] motorcaded over to a dinner hosted by Paramount, which is awaiting Trump administration approval for its bid to buy CNN’s parent Warner Bros. Discovery. The dinner invite said Paramount would be “honoring the Trump White House and CBS White House correspondents.” Anti-Trump and anti-Paramount protesters held signs and wore costumes outside, some ridiculing David Ellison by name.” “Block the Trump-Ellison merger,” one of the signs said.

For purposes of the president’s travel, the dinner was deemed “closed press,” which meant the TV press pool representative (who happened to be from CBS!) and other pool journalists were not allowed inside. Some of my CBS sources are still being tight-lipped this morning. But I’m told that editor in chief Bari Weiss and president Tom Cibrowski were both there, along with a handful of CBS correspondents from the DC bureau who were invited and attended in an off the record capacity.

Yesterday underscored how much Paramount-WBD has become a political football. The day began with an anti-merger protest outside WBD’s headquarters in NYC. The city’s mayor Zohran Mamdani also added his name to the list of opponents.

Then the virtual WBD shareholder vote took place and, as expected, the deal was “overwhelmingly” approved. Trump allies like Jason Miller, who reportedly advised an investor on Paramount’s side, celebrated on social media.

Democrats like Sen. Elizabeth Warren quickly came out and said “the Paramount-Warner Bros. merger isn’t a done deal. State attorneys general across the country are stepping up to stop this antitrust disaster. We need to keep up this fight.”

California AG Rob Bonta, appearing on MeidasTouch with Scott MacFarlane, strongly suggested that his office will sue to block the deal in the coming weeks. There are “red flags everywhere,” he said. But he also noted that “we haven’t decided yet our formal position.”

The day concluded with Trump and Ellison breaking bread together off-camera. Paramount execs continue to project confidence that they’ll receive all the necessary regulatory sign-offs between now and September…

Spooky, isn’t it? Right down to the Arab investors:

Other questions of political influence [regarding the pending Warner-Paramount merger] have piled up. The Justice Department and company leadership have maintained that politics will not play a role in the regulatory process. But Trump himself has publicly waded into Warner’s future at times, despite backpedalling on what he once suggested his personal role would be.

Trump also has a close relationship with the Ellison family, particularly billionaire Oracle founder Larry Ellison, who is putting billions of dollars on the table to back the bid for his son’s company.

Meanwhile, Paramount has secured money from several sovereign investment funds — including Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, as well as funds from the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, per regulatory filings. But such investors will not have voting rights in a future Paramount-Warner combo, the filings noted. Paramount has not publicly specified how much they’re contributing.

Other countries, including European regulators, are scrutinizing the deal.

Shares of Paramount fell nearly 6 per cent on after Thursday’s vote, and Warner Bros. slipped as well.

Writing, as I do, about the movies, I am prone to frequently quote from them. And if there is one film I am prone to quote from more often than most these days (well, Dr. Strangelove aside), it is Network.

Back in 1976, this satire made us chuckle with its outrageous conceit-the story of a “fictional” TV network who hits the ratings g-spot with a nightly newscast turned variety hour, anchored by a self-proclaimed “angry prophet denouncing the hypocrisy of our time”.

50 years later, the film plays like a documentary (denouncing the hypocrisy of our time). The  prescience of the infinitely quotable Paddy Chayefsky screenplay goes deeper than  prophesying the onslaught of news-as-entertainment (and “reality” television)-it’s a blueprint for our age. As I wrote in a 2015 piece:

I love it. Suicides, assassinations, mad bombers, Mafia hitmen, automobile smash-ups: “The Death Hour”. A great Sunday night show for the whole family.

-from Network, screenplay by Paddy Chayefsky

There is an oft-repeated lament that Hollywood and/or television has “run out of original ideas”. Which is (mostly) true, but not necessarily indicative of a dearth of talent or creativity in the business. The blame for this particular writer’s block, I believe, can be laid fairly and squarely at the feet of…Reality.

Short of plundering Middle Earth or the comic book universe for ideas, it’s getting harder to dream up a scenario as “outlandish” as, say, having to undergo a security check before taking your seat at a movie theater, or as “unthinkable” as switching on the local TV news and witnessing the horror of what happened to the 2 WDBJ reporters and the interviewee while live on air last Wednesday.

You’re television incarnate, Diana. Indifferent to suffering, insensitive to joy. All of life is reduced to the common rubble of banality. War, murder, death are all the same to you as bottles of beer.

-from Network, screenplay by Paddy Chayefsky

While just as horrified and empathetic as anyone in their right mind should be when the WDBY story broke, I’m sad to report that I wasn’t necessarily surprised. It was only a matter of time. The on-camera assassination of two TV reporters filing an innocuous story about a mall seemed a relatively tiny jump from the random murders of two theater patrons in Lafayette earlier this month…who likely assumed they weren’t risking violent death by seeking out 2 hours of escapism at the matinee showing of a romantic comedy.

In the opening scene of Network, drunken buddies Peter Finch (as Howard Beale, respected news anchor about to suffer a mental breakdown on-air and morph into “the mad prophet of the airwaves”) and William Holden (as Max Shumacher, head of the news division for the “UBS” network) riff on an imaginary pitch for a news rating booster-“Real live suicides, murders, executions-we’ll call it The Death Hour.”

Soon afterwards, Beale shocks colleagues and viewers by going off-script during one of his nightly newscasts and soberly announcing:

“I would like at this moment to announce that I will be retiring from this program in two weeks’ time because of poor ratings. Since this show is the only thing I had going for me in my life, I’ve decided to kill myself. I’m going to blow my brains out right on this program a week from today. So tune in next Tuesday. That should give the public relations people a week to promote the show. You ought to get a hell of a rating out of that. 50 share, easy.”

The network’s initial impulse is, of course, to take Beale off the air for an indeterminate hiatus; but Howard begs Max to give him one more chance, if only to publicly apologize for what he essentially describes as a momentary lapse of reason. Reluctantly, Max acquiesces.

When the following evening’s newscast (during which Beale once again goes off the rails) attracts an unprecedented number of viewers, some of the more unscrupulous programmers and marketers at the network smell a potential cash cow, and decide to let Beale rant away in front of the cameras to his heart’s content, reinventing him as a “mad prophet of the airwaves” and giving him a nightly prime time slot. The “show” (as it can really no longer be described as a “newscast”) becomes a smashing success.

Eventually, some of the truthiness in his nightly “news sermons” hits too close to home with network brass when Beale outs a pending business deal the network has made with shadowy Arab investors, and it is decided that his show needs to be cancelled (with extreme prejudice). Besides, his ratings are slipping.

The most famous scene in the film is Beale’s “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore” tirade, a call to arms (borne from a “cleansing moment of clarity”) for viewers to turn off the tube, break the spell of their collective stupor, literally stick their heads out the window and make their voices heard. It’s a memorable and inspired set piece.

For me, the most defining scene is between Beale and Arthur Jensen (CEO of “CCA”-wonderfully played by Ned Beatty). Jensen is calling Beale on the carpet for publicly exposing a potential buyout of CCA by shadowy Arab investors. Cognizant that Beale is crazy as a loon, yet still a cash cow for the network, Jensen hands him a new set of stone tablets from which to preach-the “corporate cosmology of Arthur Jensen”. I think it is screenwriter Chayefsky’s finest monologue.

Beatty picked up a Best Actor in a Supporting Role Oscar (just for that one scene!). The entire cast is superb. Faye Dunaway, who won a Best Actress statue for her performance, steals all of her scenes as Diana Christenson, the soulless, ratings obsessed head of development who schemes to turn Beale’s mental illness into revenue (“You’re television incarnate, Diana,” Max tells her at one point.) William Holden was nominated for Best Actor, for scenes like this:

Holden lost to fellow cast member Peter Finch, who was awarded with a Best Actor Oscar posthumously (sadly, he passed away shortly after filming wrapped). I have to say, that particular monologue about “primal doubts” is much more resonant to me at age 70 than it was the first time I saw Network during its first theatrical run in 1976 at age 20.

Another well-deserved Oscar went to Beatrice Straight. She had a bit more screen time than Ned Beatty, but likewise earned her statue for one particular scene (and it’s a doozy).

Robert Duvall was curiously overlooked for his indelible performance as corporate “hatchet man” Frank Hackett; but the Academy did award a statue to Paddy Chayefsky for Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen. Sidney Lumet was nominated for Best Director, and the film nominated for Best Picture, but lost to Rocky in both categories.

Fans of the film will be happy to learn that it has (finally!) been given the Criterion treatment. The package features a new 4K digital restoration, which is a noticeable picture upgrade from all previous editions (I’ve owned them all), and a crisp uncompressed monaural soundtrack.

Extras include an archival audio commentary by the late director, Paddy Chayefsky: Collector of Words (2025), an excellent feature-length documentary about the screenwriter by Matthew Miele (it premiered last year on TCM), a six-part “making of” documentary from 2006, and an insightful written essay by writer and New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie.

Previous posts with related themes:

One scene to the next: RIP Robert Duvall

10 Great American Satires

Explore the review archives at Den of Cinema

Dennis Hartley

Absolutely Astonishing

I’m not sure why I find this so shocking but I guess it’s just seeing the numbers. How can we possibly trust these people on the bench or anywhere in the government?

All 40 of [Trump’s] nominees to lifetime federal judgeships so far have given misleading or false responses to questions about the 2020 election in the Senate Judiciary Committee. Demand Justice, a progressive judicial advocacy group, has been analyzing judicial nominees’ written responses to questions from senators on the panel and found they are nearly identical in their strangely worded, evasive characterizations of the election.

All have been directly asked by the committee, “Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 election?” Instead of just saying yes, they have either pointed to Biden’s “certification” by Congress or said Biden “served” as president. Both responses allow them to skip the part about Biden actually winning the election and move on to him simply becoming president.

This is the same tactic Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill have long used to avoid publicly contradicting Trump’s lies about the 2020 election.

“Our theory from the beginning was that this was a litmus test for Trump,” Josh Orton, Demand Justice’s president, told HuffPost. “These district judges are announced on Truth Social; they know they could have their nominations pulled just as quickly on Truth Social.”

Orton is referring to Trump’s social media website, where he randomly makes major news or has full-blown meltdowns in the middle of the night.

Judicial nominees’ refusals to plainly state that Biden won in 2020 “is the show of their loyalty to Trump,” he added, “their willingness to continue this lie about losing the 2020 election and attempting to overthrow the government.”

Trump’s court picks have also been avoiding another basic question: “Was the U.S. Capitol attacked by a violent mob on January 6, 2021?” None of Trump’s 40 court picks have said yes, per Demand Justice’s analysis, with the vast majority characterizing the violence of that day as “a political debate” or “political issue.”

They either lied under oath or refuse to believe their own eyes, either of which renders them completely unfit to be a judge. It’s astonishing that they have actually been confirmed and I think they should all be impeached on that basis.

This is truly Orwellian and since it seems to have happened in slow motion we’re all just going along with it.

Kash Out?

If he was a woman there would not be any question:

Speculation ramped up this week over which ranking administration chief will go next after Pentagon head Pete Hegseth ousted his Navy secretary — with President Donald Trump’s blessing. Now, a top White House official tells Dasha that Patel is likely the next Cabinet-level official to go.

“It’s only a matter of time,” the official, who was granted anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter, said of the FBI director.

There are several reasons, the official said, but top among them is the number of negative stories centered on the FBI director is “not a good look for a Cabinet secretary,” and Trump is fed up with the level of distraction.

Earlier this month, The Atlantic published a story recounting allegations that Patel had episodes of “conspicuous inebriation and unexplained absences.” Patel denied the allegations and sued The Atlantic for defamation. The New York Times reported in February that Patel instructed FBI agents to provide a full-time security detail for his girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins. The FBI told The Times she needed the protection because she faced death threats.

The FBI declined to comment on Patel’s future. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: “Under President Trump and Director Patel’s leadership at the FBI, crime across the country has plummeted to the lowest level in more than 100 years and many high profile criminals have been put behind bars. Director Patel remains a critical player on the Administration’s law and order team.”

I suspect that Trump may be upset about the boozing. He doesn’t like drunks although he has tolerated quite a few of them in his orbit. But the bad press plus booze may be what tips the balance on Kash.

The word is that he’s “in a bad mood” and ready to start the purge. Whether it’s Kash or Tulsi or maybe even Lutnick. it looks like they all need to start setting up their own “cash out” plans. I’m sure it will be very lucrative for all of them.

Why Do We Have To Reinvent The Wheel?

This Frontline report made me want to cry. People are not getting their kids vaccinated for no good reason. They’re starting to get sick and some are going to end up disabled or dead. Again, for no good reason.

Just two years after a deadly outbreak of polio raged across the country, the children lined up in the basement gymnasium of a Pittsburgh elementary school for what became the largest medical experiment in America.

One by one, they were led to tables draped in white cloth and covered with vials, waiting for their turn to be injected with a vaccine newly created to combat the catastrophic disease.

One giggled. Others fidgeted. Some of the youngest shrieked as needles with the red liquid were inserted into their arms.

In less than two hours, it was over. Dr. Jonas Salk, the creator of the vaccine, injected 137 children before they were led to an area shrouded by curtains to rest.

Under the glare of news cameras, the first public trial of the vaccine at Arsenal Elementary School in 1954 was a turning point in the battle against an epidemic that had left thousands of people dead and even more sickened and paralyzed.

The shots would nearly eliminate the polio cases spreading across the country and help build a broad acceptance of childhood immunizations for decades to follow.

But the Pittsburgh school that helped launch one of medicine’s most towering achievements is now at high risk of another dangerous childhood disease: measles.

We are intentionally going backwards because we have allowed a political faction that is hostile to science for religious (evolution) and capitalistic (fossil fuel) reasons to dominate our society to such an extent that they have convinced people to reject the advances that made our country the most advanced in the world. Now we’re going to have to learn it all over again the hard way.

This is not an accident and it wasn’t not inevitable. I don’t want to hear anything about how people are threatened by modernity and losing their status and can’t help being racist or anything else. This was a concerted campaign to devalue science by very specific institutions in our society and a political party that exploited it for power. That’s what happened and we shouldn’t fool ourselves into thinking otherwise.

You can watch the whole thing at the link. It’s depressing but unsurprising.

FFS

They really need to find a way to get him to shut the fuck up. There is a stalemate and both sides are intransigent. But this isn’t helping. He doesn’t know what he’s saying and has no idea how to do any kind of diplomacy. I have no doubt that he’s making everything worse.

Update —

As I was saying:

If Trump would just devote his attention to the ballroom, I am highly confident that there is a career FSO or civil servant at State who could manage these negotiations more competently.

Brian Finucane (@bcfinucane.bsky.social) 2026-04-25T19:37:24.893Z

Moral Budgets, Human Decency

I remember a decent United States

Some say you can’t legislate morality. Others push back saying that every piece of legislation reflects moral choices. “Budgets are moral documents” is often attributed to Rev. Martin Luther King. Over at Slate, Nicholas Enrich argues that if the U.S. wants to redeem its moral standing after the predations of the Trump era, it must begin with restoring USAID. Lawmakers stood by as Trump and DOGE “killed a congressionally mandated federal agency that had enjoyed broad bipartisan support for more than six decades.” That action left a stain:

The dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development has taken a devastating toll, with more than 750,000 lives already lost—most of them children—due to the cuts, and far worse yet to come. The reckless destruction of USAID stands out as one of the most costly decisions of the Trump administration to date. That decision, however, does not have to be a permanent one.

Candidates for president should make it a campaign pledge to rebuild USAID:

This should be an easy promise for anyone seeking office. The case for USAID is both unequivocal and overwhelmingly popular. The agency was one of the best investments across the entire government. On less than 1 percent of the federal budget, USAID saved 92 million lives around the world in the past two decades alone. And it made Americans safer too. The agency helped countries develop early warning systems to ensure that infectious disease outbreaks were rapidly detected and contained before they risked spreading to our borders. It projected American generosity and soft power in ways that built lasting alliances far more efficiently than could ever be achieved militarily.

But USAID didn’t make things go BOOM! Donald Trump like things that go boom.

“USAID worked well. It was dismantled to satisfy the ego of a billionaire at a cost of the suffering of millions,” Enrich writes. “It is not enough to decry the damage done by DOGE’s destruction. USAID can be rebuilt, and it must be.”

The agency’s logo—a handshake over the words From the American People—was a ubiquitous reminder that the U.S. was committed to making the world a healthier and safer place. That is why Congress created USAID as an independent agency in the first place, and now Congress must insist that it be reestablished.

One of my neighbors retired from USAID. Get him to talk about projects he worked on around the world and your pride in America swells. I’d like that feeling back. Wouldn’t you?

On the lack of human decency front, this announcement from the “goes boom” Trump administration that it will reinstate death by firing squad;

“The prior administration failed in its duty to protect the American people by refusing to pursue and carry out the ultimate punishment against the most dangerous criminals, including terrorists, child murderers, and cop killers,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.  “Under President Trump’s leadership, the Department of Justice is once again enforcing the law and standing with victims.”

Raw Story collected online response:

“So the government that can’t deliver mail reliably now gets to decide who dies and how?” Political commentator Joe Lowson wrote on X.

“Wealthy men in suits who have never seen up close or engaged in violence now seemingly obsessed by it,” television personality Damon Bennett wrote on X.

“Was anyone anywhere asking for this? The lack of focus on the real issues is frightening,” Peter Hopey, writer and former columnist for the Bleacher report, posted on X.

“Let’s see how this one plays out,” film critic April Wolfe wrote on Bluesky.

“I thought this was an Onion headline at first,” Cristóbal Muñoz, who self-identifies as a Southern California Business owner, wrote on Bluesky.

The death penalty as the “ultimate punishment” has been a talking point on the bloodthirsty right for as long as I can remember. Decades ago, I heard this topic debated on the radio. The right alleges without evidence that we need the the ultimate punishment (death) as a deterrent to vicious crime. But, the Opposed debater asked, what’s so ultimate about the death penalty?

“For every criminal you do not execute, you’re taking an innocent life,” Opposed said, mocking the right’s position. So what if you could demonstrate that a sentence to a life of torture was a better deterrent? Then would the right argue that for every criminal you do not execute, you’re taking an innocent life?

A moral society has limits and adheres to them, Opposed argued. The state should not practice behavior it legally condemns.

Opposed did not foresee the Trump administration.

Still Life Of An Autocrat

He’s in. He’s out. He’s in….

A flagging economy isn’t the only thing Donald Trump has trouble propping up. Also, his own eyelids.

The New Republic:

Our nearly 80-year-old president appears to have nodded off during a meeting, for the umpteenth time

President Trump’s eyes grew visibly heavy around the halfway point of his televised announcement of a deal with drug company Regeneron on Thursday afternoon, closing fully and reopening multiple times while suited Cabinet members and pharmaceutical executives stood behind him in the Oval Office. 

This is the same man who keeps calling former President Joe Biden “Sleepy Joe.” 

Friday Night Soother

Bat-eared fox kits. Awwww…

They’re little canines!

This peculiar-looking canine lives in the open savannas and shrublands of Africa, where it burrows underground and uses its exceptional hearing to hunt for termites and beetles.

What does a bat-eared fox look like?

As members of the Canidae family, these animals resemble small, thin dogs. Notably, they have exceptionally large ears, making them look almost like giant bats. 

Their bodies are covered in a silvery-brown fur coat, with a distinctive raccoon-like mask covering their eyes, and black lower legs, feet, and tail tips. They usually weigh between 7 and 12 pounds, similar in size to a large house cat.

Bat-eared foxes are found in two distinct subpopulations in eastern and southern Africa. The animals are adapted to live in the grasslands and savannas of these regions, where wide-open vistas make it easy for them to spot predators and hunt for prey. 

These foxes are prolific diggers, excavating large dens and burrows with the aid of long claws on their forefeet. The dens serve as a shelter and a place to raise their young. The foxes typically sleep in these dens during the daytime and emerge around twilight, although this can vary based on the activity level of their preferred prey.

Bat-eared foxes can have several large dens in their territory. Multiple entrances and exits in each den help them slip by predators, including jackals, eagles, and hyenas. 

What do bat-eared foxes eat?

Primarily insects! Bat-eared foxes are the only member of the dog family that specializes in eating insects. Around 90 percent of their diet in the wild is made up of insects, particularly the harvester termite. 

The remaining part of their diet is just about anything else they can find — fruits, berries, seeds, lizards, eggs, rodents, grasshoppers, beetles, scorpions, crickets, and even some species of fungi. 

Bat eared foxes have the most teeth of any placental mammal — 46 to 50 in total — which scientists believe is an adaptation to help them crunch up insects. 

Bat eared foxes get their name from their ears—and it’s easy to see why. Their ears can reach 5 inches (13 centimeters) long, which helps explain their incredibly good hearing. 

Their hearing is so strong they can pick up on beetles and termites burrowing underground. 

Their ears also help them regulate heat, a handy adaptation for life on the African savanna. By pumping blood through their ears, they can cool themselves off when the weather gets too hot. 

Florida Dummymander, Comin’ Right Up

After all the rending of garments and gnashing of teeth over the Virginia redistricting voter being “undemocratic” and “disenfranchising” rural voters, get a load of what Ron Desantis has up his sleeve:

Florida bans lawmakers from intentionally creating congressional seats to give their party an advantage. But Gov. Ron DeSantis quietly has launched a three-tiered power play to evade the ban — and create more GOP-friendly seats — in November.[…]

DeSantis rejected lawmakers’ calls to have an open process and draw the maps during the regular January lawmaking session. Instead, he’s embarked on a plan to have his office redraw Florida’s map, rush the plan through the legislature — and try to run out the clock on Democratic court challenges as the state gears up for the Nov. 3 elections. DeSantis’ clock-management strategy is rooted in three factors:

  1. The “Purcell Principle” — Named after a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case, this generally limits lower courts from overturning election laws too close to an election to avoid voter confusion.
  • Critics have long complained that Purcell rewards lawmakers who manipulate the clock with late-breaking redistricting changes.

2. The Apex Doctrine and executive privilege — Because his employees are drafting the maps, DeSantis’ team is expected to argue in court that executive privilege shields them. His office argued that in a 2022 redistricting court challenge.

  • In that case, top DeSantis officials involved in drafting those maps also fought to avoid depositions under the Apex Doctrine, which forces a plaintiff to first exhaust efforts to examine low-level employees before targeting high-level ones. That burns court time.

3. Secrecy — DeSantis’ office is drafting the maps in such secrecy that plaintiffs could have trouble finding whom to depose and what records to look for. That would cause more delays.

  • In 2022, DeSantis became the first Florida governor in recent history to submit his own congressional maps that were drafted out of the public eye. Normally, the maps are drawn by legislators, providing a record that court challengers could use draw from to prove intent.
  • DeSantis’ process is so clandestine that Florida legislators who are to vote on the new maps Tuesday hadn’t seen them as of Thursday night.

It’s pointless to call out GOP hypocrisy since they are completely shameless but this is so bad you have to almost admire their chutzpah. They really don’t give a damn about any kind of integrity anymore.

There’s another reason why they’ve been delaying doing this. It’s because they’re already about as gerrymandered as you can get with safe seats. If they do this they may regret it:

There’s a risk in creating more Republican seats in Florida, which requires breaking up Democratic districts or diluting them. That can make surrounding GOP-held seats vulnerable as they get more Democratic voters.

  • And as gas prices climb and Trump’s poll numbers fall, Republicans could lose once-safe seats as Democrats and independents are added to a district.
  • “It’s yin-and-yang: To make blue seats more purple, you have to make red seats more purple,” said one Florida legislative Republican.

Nevertheless, national Republicans who aren’t familiar with the vagaries of Florida’s political geography hope DeSantis will somehow carve out about four new GOP-leaning seats.

Go for it Ron.If it works you’re a hero. If not you’ll go out of office in a blaze of glory (hopefully set back so much that you won’t even have the nerve to run for president in 28. )

Sleepy Donald

Maybe if he didn’t stay up all night writing gibberish on Truth Social he wouldn’t be so tired.