Skip to content

Author: digby

Did You Think They Were Just Going After Non-Citizens?

Think again:

The Trump administration is dramatically expanding an effort to revoke U.S. citizenship for foreign-born Americans as it works to curb immigration, according to two people familiar with the plans.

Over the past several months, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the agency within the Department of Homeland Security that’s responsible for legal immigration, has been sending experts to its offices around the country or reassigning staff members to focus on whether some citizens processed through those offices could now be denaturalized, these people said.

The goal of emphasizing naturalized citizens is to supply the office of immigration litigation with 100 to 200 possible cases per month, one of the people familiar with the plans said. Such cases have typically been very rare, involving people who concealed criminal histories or previous human rights violations during their application processes. The New York Times first reported the quota.

By comparison, throughout the four years of President Donald Trump’s first term, the administration formally filed a total of 102 such cases, according to the Justice Department.

The effort is part of the overall push by Homeland Security to drastically curtail immigration and deliver on Trump’s policy agenda. The push has included DHS’ sending scores of immigration enforcement officers into U.S. cities on deportation missions and purchasing mega warehouses to hold detainees.

DHS has also increasingly sought to remove legal immigrants from the U.S. by revoking thousands of visas, including for some people who participated in pro-Palestinian protests, and trying to deport green card holders.

Let’s be clear. They are engaged in a program of ethnic cleansing. Anyone who is foreign born is on the chopping block. And most of them are non-white. (If they could deport all African Americans they would certainly do so but they may be stuck there — they’ll just ratchet up incarceration instead.)

Stephen Miller had made it very, very clear that he wants all foreigners out and wants to shut the door on letting any new ones in. Trump will make noises once in a while about letting him “the good ones” because he still has a vague subliminal knowledge of the (dying) conventional wisdom that America is the land of freedom and opportunity. (He doesn’t actually care about any of that, of course, but he knows that some people do.)

They have three years left to ratchet up this program. No one should be sanguine that they won’t do it, even if the Democrats miraculously manage to win the midterms. This, graft, and the monuments to Dear Leader, are the main objectives of the Trump 2.0 administration.

Let’s Hear It For The Boys

They seem to have awakened:

President Trump’s job approval is 34 points underwater among young men, with 32% approving and 66% disapproving of his performance in office.

A paltry 26% of young men would back a J.D. Vance presidential run in the 2028 general election, with 55% opposing and 17% unsure.

A 61% supermajority of young men say Trump is not fulfilling his campaign promise to put America first, including 25% of young Republican men and 64% of Independents.

Thirty-three percent of young men combined—including 15% of young Republican men—hold Trump (24%) and Republican leaders (9%) as the figures with the greatest responsibility for lowering the country’s temperature around political violence, while just 6% say Democratic leaders hold this responsibility.

Young men are most alarmed by Trump’s $1 trillion cut to health care (66% very concerned), followed by his opposition to fully releasing the Epstein files (63%), and his expansion of immigration raids to target anyone who looks or sounds foreign (60%).

Sixty-five percent of young men say that they are either struggling to pay bills (27%) or are just making enough to pay bills (38%).

Fifty-eight percent of young men believe that Trump has negatively impacted their finances, while just 23% say that he has had a positive impact.

Half of young men blame Trump’s tariffs for higher grocery costs (49%), while a larger share blame private corporations that purchase real estate for high housing costs (65%).

An astonishing 73% of young men believe that American culture has changed for the worse since their parents were their age—20 points higher than the electorate overall. 

That’s from Third Way which is hardly a left leaning institution.

I won’t belabor the point that Trump was a known quantity in 2024 and there’s no excuse for why so many people voted for him anyway. You know how I feel about that. But if anyone can be excused it’s the younger folks who have less experience with politics and only knew that things were better when they were younger and they associated that with Trump.

They won’t make that mistake again.

A Golden Age?

Maybe. But it’s not the one Trump thinks it is.

Even for a president accustomed to making grandiose statements, this one was a whopper. On Wednesday, Donald Trump said in an interview with Fox Business that we are living in “the greatest period of anything we’ve ever seen.” That’s more than a bit vague, but I think we know what he meant. 

Trump has always bragged incessantly about himself and his alleged accomplishments. But ever since he returned to the White House in 2025, he’s been touting his presidency as a “Golden Age,” even going so far as to make the expression tangible by slapping gilt on everything in sight. He genuinely believes he can change reality simply by relentlessly stating something as fact in the face of all evidence to the contrary. His repeated insistence, though, that the country has never been as successful as it is today has so far landed with a thud.

We are, in fact, living in an historic time. Americans have rarely been more pessimistic about the future. According to the Gallup National Health and Well-Being Index, Americans who believe they will have high-quality lives in five years declined to the lowest level since the organization began asking the question 20 years ago. Those who believe that both their current and future lives are good enough to be classified as “thriving” dropped to 48%. If this is America’s Golden Age, it doesn’t appear that people are seeing it.

In fact, the right-wing polling organization Rasmussen asked the question outright and found bad news for the president: Only 27% of those surveyed see this as the country’s “Golden Age,” as compared to 58% who do not. Even more galling to Trump has to be the finding that 48% of voters now say that Joe Biden was the better president. Only 40% said the same of Trump. (A Harvard CAPS/Harris poll similarly reported that 51% favored Biden over Trump, a dramatic — and recent — switch from December, when Trump was on top at 53%.)

Some of these findings are no doubt driven by partisan swings according to who is in the White House. But these polls are finding that even Republicans are feeling pessimistic, despite all of Trump’s happy talk. In fact, I would think that his portrayal of the country as having never been better sounds downright delusional to even some of his ardent supporters. 

All this despondency appears to be having an effect on the GOP leadership. Trump and his acolytes have been sent into paroxysms of anger by the mild criticisms offered by American athletes at the Winter Olympics. When skier Hunter Hess had the temerity to say “Just because I’m wearing the flag doesn’t mean I represent everything that’s going on in the U.S.,” the president called him a loser and said he shouldn’t have tried out for the team. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted on X, “Raise your hand if you think Olympic Skier Hunter Hess should be disqualified off the U.S. Team.” That idea got a ringing endorsement from Utah Sen. Mike Lee, who posted, “If you can’t stand up for your country while abroad—at the Olympics or otherwise Stay home.” Podcaster Megyn Kelly said that “Hess should be stripped of his ability to rep the USA & sent home.”

Many of Hess’ fellow athletes have made similar comments, reflecting the overwhelming attitude among the majority of young people in America who are deeply pessimistic about the country. Their messages weren’t about the price of eggs or worries about getting ahead. If there was one overarching concern, it was about being perceived as endorsing the hateful behavior and attitudes the world is seeing acted out under the leadership of the Trump administration every day.

“I’m racing for an American people who stand for love, for acceptance, for compassion, honesty and respect for others,” cross country skier Jessie Diggins wrote. “I do not stand for hate or violence or discrimination.” Chris Lillis, a freestyle skier, said, “I feel heartbroken about what’s happened in the United States. As a country we need to focus on respecting everybody’s rights and making sure that we’re treating our citizens, as well as anybody, with love and respect. I hope that when people look at athletes competing in the Olympics they realize that that’s the America we’re trying to represent.” 

Those are values that these young Americans hold. But it isn’t just young people. Rich Ruohonen, who at 54 is the oldest man to ever represent the U.S. in the Winter Olympics — and happens to hail from Minnesota — gave a spirited speech during a press conference explicitly calling out the authoritarian tactics deployed by the Trump administration in his home state, while simultaneously declaring his love for his country and its freedoms. As of Tuesday, not one American participant in the games had stood up for Donald Trump or his policies.

There have been protests before at the Olympics, and they were always met with angry denunciations from the right. Their reflexive reaction to anyone suggesting that America isn’t perfect has always been “Love it or leave it.” But Trump, with his own constant carping about the United States both at home and abroad, has turned that notion sideways. While the president often proclaims that things have never been better, his endless insults and criticisms of his fellow Americans actually convey the clear impression that the country is a chaotic mess of mutual loathing and factional hatred. No wonder everyone is so pessimistic. 

This is a change. America has certainly had its dark periods, and there were no doubt times that the people felt the future was grim. But for the most part, America has always been an optimistic nation, with the future beckoning a better day for everyone. The proverbial image of the U.S. as a “shining city on a hill” once resonated with immigrants who came to this country believing that here was a place to build a better life for themselves and their families. 

The sight of those Olympians feeling the need — and the freedom — to champion liberal values of diversity, kindness and compassion, as well as opposition to injustice, is a sign that all is not lost. And perhaps the best example of all came on Sunday when global superstar Bad Bunny performed at the Super Bowl halftime show and served up a roaring example of those values before over 128 million people all over the world. The joy expressed in his message of inclusion and universality said more about the America that most of its people actually believe in than any golden monuments to Trump will ever do.

The right’s cramped vision of American greatness, with its sour, white nationalist ideology and cruel authoritarian methods, is a good reason to be pessimistic. But the resilience of the American people from Minneapolis to Milan is telling a different story. For all of our gloom about the future, it appears we aren’t giving up. Perhaps the Golden Age really is upon us after all. It’s just not the one Donald Trump thinks it is. 

Salon

He Finally Got Their Attention

And they don’t like what they see

G. Elliott Morris:

In 2024, the voters who knew the least about politics were some of Donald Trump’s strongest supporters. One pre-election poll found Americans who didn’t consume any news at all said they’d vote for him over Kamala Harris by a 20-point margin, 60%¹ to 40%.

Today, the president’s support among low-knowledge voters has cratered to just 43%, according to a new analysis of data from our January Strength In Numbers/Verasight poll. The share of 2024 voters who now disapprove of the president is well over 55%.

According to our poll, low-knowledge voters backed Trump by a net margin of 11 points in 2024. Now, however, the same low-knowledge voters say they disapprove of the president by 13 points — a 25-point shift away from the president.

High-knowledge voters were roughly evenly split in 2024 (voting for Harris by 2 points, per self-reports in our data), and have moved against Trump at a softer rate, to -14. The two groups are compared in the following chart:

He’s so ubiquitous that even the people who studiously avoid the news can’t help but notice that he’s destroying everything he touches.

Apparently, these low info voters skew younger and poorer and are less ideological making them more likely to be moved by actual conditions on the ground than others. That’s bad news for Trump.

More at the link.

Everything He Does Is Poison

There is nothing left of his presidency but vengeance and vainglory:

An annual meeting of the nation’s governors that has long served as a rare bipartisan gathering is unraveling after President Donald Trump excluded Democratic governors from White House events.

The National Governors Association said it will no longer hold a formal meeting with Trump when governors are scheduled to convene in Washington later this month, after the White House planned to invite only Republican governors. On Tuesday, 18 Democratic governors also announced they would boycott a traditional dinner at the White House.

“If the reports are true that not all governors are invited to these events, which have historically been productive and bipartisan opportunities for collaboration, we will not be attending the White House dinner this year,” the Democrats wrote. “Democratic governors remain united and will never stop fighting to protect and make life better for people in our states.”

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, a Republican who chairs the NGA, told fellow governors in a letter on Monday that the White House intended to limit invitations to the association’s annual business meeting, scheduled for Feb. 20, to Republican governors only.

“Because NGA’s mission is to represent all 55 governors, the Association is no longer serving as the facilitator for that event, and it is no longer included in our official program,” Stitt wrote in the letter, which was obtained by The Associated Press.

[…]

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Tuesday that Trump has “discretion to invite anyone he wants to the White House.”

“It’s the people’s house,” she said. “It’s also the president’s home, so he can invite whomever he wants to dinners and events here at the White House.”

Every Day he becomes more and more puerile. A spoiled, nasty brat who ruins everything he touches.

I’m frankly a little bit surprised that the Republican Governors didn’t elbow each other out of the way to be the first in line to kiss his ring but maybe they too are getting sick of being pushed around by his royal high-ass. A small step in the right direction?

Lutnick The Buffoon

Krugman takes on Trump’s most fervent fluffer today:

There are people in positions of great power in the U.S. government engaged in evil conspiracies against everything that is good and decent. Their conspiracies are far more extensive and damaging than almost anyone imagined. But there are no evil masterminds behind this. Only amoral, stupid grifters like Howard Lutnick.

During Trump 47’s first year, Lutnick, the Commerce secretary, was an omnipresent spokesman for Donald Trump’s policies, a constant presence on TV, especially the Sunday talk shows.

He was not impressive in that role. Unlike Scott Bessent, he lacked any hint of gravitas. He doesn’t have Pete Hegseth’s hair. Moreover, Lutnick’s Trump boosterism has been consistently and embarrassingly incompetent.

The only waves he has made are a result of his exceptional combination of stupidity and offensive tone-deafness.

Thus he promised to revive U.S. manufacturing by bringing back “the work of millions and millions of human beings screwing in little, little screws.” Lutnick, a billionaire, dismissed concerns about chaos at the Social Security Administration by saying that his mother-in-law wouldn’t complain about a missed check. He gave a Europe-bashing speech to a private dinner at Davos so offensive that Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank, walked out.

And in Congressional testimony today, Lutnick admitted that he visited Epstein Island, but said that he did so with his wife, nannies and children, and asserted that “We left with all of my children.”

It would be tempting to dismiss Lutnick as a buffoon. Yet despite his intelligence deficit, he sits at the intersection of not one but at least two ugly conspiracies.

Before joining Trump’s cabinet, Lutnick ran the Wall Street firm Cantor Fitzgerald — presenting a huge potential conflict of interest that he claims to have ended by turning the business over to … his sons. Cantor Fitzgerald, in turn, is intimately linked to Tether, a cryptocurrency that is highly profitable because it has become a favorite channel for money-laundering by international criminals.

Nor was money-laundering through cryptocurrency the only criminal conspiracy to which Lutnick was, at the very least, adjacent. Lutnick has in the past vehemently denied having any association with Jeffrey Epstein, insisting that he severed all contact with the pedophile ringleader in 2005. But even the highly limited, extremely redacted release of the Epstein files — everything we’ve seen reeks of a major coverup — shows that he was flat-out lying. Not only did he stay in close contact with Epstein, the two men appear to have gone into business together.

But, at this point, who could possibly be surprised? The more we learn, the more pedophilia and criminal use of cryptocurrency look related, even like different aspects of a single conspiracy. Epstein, it turns out, was a major early investor in the crypto industry. In the backrooms of MAGA-land, passing around under-age girls is a lot like passing around insider crypto deals.

In any previous administration, Lutnick’s naked conflicts of interest and his Epstein lies would have led to his immediate departure. But Trump 47 is using his position to massively enrich himself, and whatever the Justice department is hiding, what we already know about Trump’s personal history is damning — “Grab ‘em by the pussy. You can do anything.”

As he points out, he’s not going to resign and Trump won’t fire him because that would admit that “would be a tacit admission that huge conflicts of interest, family business that enables crime and association with sexual predators are bad.” We can’t have that.

And yes, they are monumentally stupid. But then, as Krugman reminds us:

It’s worth remembering Hannah Arendt’s observations about the architects of Hitler’s genocide, which led her to coin the phrase “the banality of evil”. As Arendt noted, the horrors of Nazism were not inflicted by brilliant geniuses, but through the normalization of thoughtless, amoral behavior that eventually turned into evil.

That’s where we’re headed and we’re almost there.

Yep, Yep, Yep

“These sneaking and cowardly Sicilians, the descendants of bandits and assassins, who have transported to this country the lawless passions, the cutthroat practices and the oathbound societies, are to us a pest without mitigation. Our own rattlesnakes are as good citizens as they.”NYT editorial 1891

Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes.bsky.social) 2026-02-11T17:41:57.511Z

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

This reminded me of the Samuel Alito interview in Politico Magazine in which he talks about his mentor the late Justice Antonin Scalia who is described like this in the article:

Around 6 p.m., after a bus packed with lawyers had barreled down the Jersey Turnpike, the man of honor arrived: Antonin Scalia, the Trenton native freshly sworn in as the 103rd justice of the United States Supreme Court, with his wife Maureen. Smiling and shaking hands as he clutched his pipe, Scalia, still black of hair and slender of frame at 50, embodied the American Dream: the son of a Sicilian immigrant father and first-generation Italian American mother who vaulted, through innate genius, hard work, devout Catholicism and Tri-State charm, to the top five at Harvard Law; senior legal positions in the Nixon and Ford administrations; law professorships at the University of Virginia and the University of Chicago; the appellate bench; and finally, the pinnacle of his profession, the Supreme Court, where he was the first Italian American justice.

[…]

One of the Tri-State lawyers who waited in line that night was a 36-year-old fellow Trentonian and Italian American, a graduate of Princeton and Yale Law with brown, frizzy hair, and taller than the justice. He wore a grey suit, maroon-striped tie and a lapel sticker, white with blue trim, reading: SAMUEL ALITO.

And?

Rosen: Was it at all a thing for you when [Scalia] was nominated to the Supreme Court, the fact that he was the first Italian American?

Alito: Yes, it was. And it was for millions of Italian Americans. And you can see that in the reaction within the Italian American community to his nomination. Italian Americans, unlike, let’s say, the Irish, were never a particularly cohesive voting bloc. … But everyone was united behind this because it really did represent the opening of a door, symbolically. … He was the antidote to the stereotypes about Italian Americans … prevalent at the time, and [which] continue to this day. If you look at the Italian American characters in, let’s say, movies and on TV, you’ve got the gangsters and the criminals, and then you have kind of the low — the dumb buffoons. So you look at the character that John Travolta played when he was in that — what was the TV show?

Rosen: “Welcome Back, Kotter.”

Alito: Yeah, “Welcome Back, Kotter.” Or Tony Danza in —

Rosen: “Taxi.”

Alito: “Taxi.” Or Henry Winkler in — what was it?

Rosen: “Happy Days.”

Alito: “Happy Days.” You know, that’s the way people, a lot of people, thought about Italian Americans. You know, maybe they could sing and Joe DiMaggio was a good athlete. … But somebody who was a serious intellectual, that was something. And that was a real antidote.

What a wonderful American story, eh?

Of course Italian-Americans are different, right? They aren’t like those Haitians or Laotians or Venezuelans we have today. Except, at the time of the great migration to America from Italy, the right wingers of the day certainly believed they were, didn’t they?

The lack of self-awareness among the avatars of the American right is a thing to behold.

The Right Speech

Dan Pfeiffer says this is the speech every Democrat should watch and think about. It will work everywhere:

Pfeiffer writes:

The speech does a few things that every Democrat can emulate, even if they are not as young or as charismatic. It offers a model for a party that is still struggling to find a compelling story about what Trump and Republicans are doing to the country.

Be Fearless

Throughout the speech, Ossoff shows no fear and no caution. He is not worried about who he might offend or how centrist pundits will react.

He just lets it rip.

When talking about Trump’s racist social media post about the Obamas, Ossoff says:

You’re seeing what I’m seeing, right? The president posting about the Obamas like a Klansman.

The context matters here. Ossoff is not a Democrat in a deep-blue seat taking viral shots at Trump to raise money and earn praise online.

[…]

The standard consultant-class advice in that situation would be to sand down the edges—and in a Southern state, to stay far away from race and racial politics. Comparing the president of the United States to a “Klansman” is, to put it mildly, bold.

I am not arguing that every Democrat should throw all caution to the wind. But there is real value in boldness—not just with the base, but with persuadable voters. Fearlessness communicates strength. It distinguishes a candidate from the familiar, mealy-mouthed politicians who try to please everyone and offend no one.

I couldn’t agree more. There is just no margin in trying to be “moderate” when it comes to describing what’s going on in our country. It is what it is and the only way to deal with it is by being brutally honest. MAGA voters will never believe it but it’s clear that Independents and even some Republicans around the margins are seeing it. You will get nowhere with those people by failing to acknowledge reality.

He says that Ossof’s corruption message works because he artfully presents it in a way that shows how it hurts the American people:

Now you remember we were told that MAGA was for working-class Americans. You remember that? But this is a government of, by, and for the ultra-rich. It is the wealthiest cabinet ever. This is the Epstein class ruling our country. They are the elites they pretend to hate.

So prices are up. Jobs are going away. Medicaid and school lunches are slashed. Nursing homes are getting defunded. If you’re Steve Bannon, and your pitch was Trump for the forgotten man and woman, how do you sell any of this? Trump was supposed to fight for the working class. Instead, he’s literally closing rural clinics and hospitals to cut taxes for George Soros and Elon Musk. He was supposed to end the globalist, world-police foreign policy. Instead, we’re doing war for oil and nation-building again—and threatening to conquer Greenland. He was supposed to drain the swamp. Instead, this is the most corrupt administration of all time. And everybody knows it.

Pfeiffer:

Democrats need an anti-corruption message not only to damage Republicans, but to show voters that we share their anger at a rigged political system—and that we can be trusted to take it on. That only works, of course, if we also have credible messengers and real proposals to fix it.

He likes the reference to the “Epstein class” which is catching on among Democrats.

And then there’s this which I think is very good

A Patriotic Appeal to Unity

Somewhere along the way, hope for a better future started to sound like nostalgia for a long-gone past. Anyone who suggests that we are not hopelessly and permanently divided is now treated as naïve.

I don’t buy that.

To paraphrase my old friend David Axelrod, voters are looking for a remedy to Trump’s hate and division, not a replica of it. Democrats have to find a way to paint a picture of a better, more hopeful, and less hateful future.

Here is Jon Ossoff’s attempt to do exactly that:

I listened to a speech a few months ago by a senator from Missouri aligned with the president, and what I think I heard him say was that the only real Americans are those descended from the original European settlers. Now, maybe he forgot that the Mayflower itself was full of religious exiles fleeing persecution. But our heritage is not limited to the pilgrims or those who settled the West.

America’s heritage includes the descendants of enslaved people who won liberation from slavery and Jim Crow. It includes the Creek people who lived in middle Georgia for eleven centuries. And it includes immigrants from every region and every continent who came here fleeing persecution or seeking opportunity.

Americans are not a race. We are a people—united not by ethnicity, but by shared convictions. That is what makes us exceptional, and that is what makes America a beacon to the world.

I think people are craving this sort of thing. You can see it in the resistance in Minneapolis and the appeals to love not hate among young people that the country is reeling from all this horror and they are inspired by those who still believe what Ossoff is saying in that speech.

Pfeiffer explains that it’s important to put this in the specific context that Ossoff puts it:

This appeal works precisely because it comes after tough, unvarnished, and fearless criticism of Trump. Aspiring to unity is not a sign of weakness. It is a sign of strength.

I think that’s important. Courage combined with empathy is powerful.

If you get the chance watch the whole thing. It’s very good. I hope that Trump hasn’t succeeded in rigging Georgia so that Ossoff can’t win. In any case, his message is the one that resonates in this moment.

Pam Bondi, 12 Year Old Mean Girl

She’s put on quite a performance today. Trump will give her a nice pat on the head for acting like a sociopathic tween on national television.

I think this says it all:

“You can let her filibuster all day long, but not on our watch — not on our time, no way,” Raskin said. “And I told you about that, Attorney General, before you started.”

“You don’t tell me anything,” Bondi erupted, before mocking Raskin as a “washed-up, loser lawyer — not even a lawyer.”

Bondi then rounded on Nadler, telling him: “You said the president conspired, sought foreign interference in the 2016 election. Robert Mueller found no evidence, none, of foreign interference in 2016. Have you apologized to President Trump?

“You all should be apologizing. You sit here and you attack the president, and I am not going to have it. I’m not going to put up with it,” she continued.

Here are a few highlights:

Lieu plays Bondi the infamous clip of Trump and Epstein partying together and asks her if there were underaged girls at any party the two attended together “This is so ridiculous,” Bondi says. “There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime” “I believe you just lied under oath,” Lieu replies

This one, though is ad-worthy:

NEGUSE: AG Bondi, that man works for you now, right? The man in that video from January 6 allegedly yelling ‘kill them!’ at police officers. His name is Jared Wise.

BONDI: He does work for us, yes. I believe he was pardoned by President Trump

NEGUSE: And you expect hard-working police officers to believe you take law enforcement seriously?

So is this:

You cannot make this stuff up.

Stupid MAGA Outrage O’ The Day

As you know, MAGA was very, very upset about the Bad Bunny halftime show being performed in Spanish. Trump called it a slap in the face. But did you know they are also very, very upset about the Spanish lyrics they didn’t understand:

In an appearance on the rightwing channel Real America’s Voice on Tuesday, a Republican congressman from Missouri, Mark Alford, said “we are still investigating” the lyrics of a song performed in Spanish by the Puerto Rican superstar Bad Bunny during his Super Bowl halftime show on Sunday.

“The lyrics, from what we have seen, from Bad Bunny are very disturbing,” Alford said, apparently referring to outrage stirred by a rightwing media personality, Megan Basham, who posted an English translation of explicit lyrics from the Spanish-language song Safaera without realizing that Bad Bunny had performed a cleaned-up version for the televised broadcast, which was also partially obscured by bleeps.

“If it holds true that, um… you know I don’t speak fluent Spanish, okay?” Alford continued. “I know how to ask where the bathroom is – but, these lyrics, if it is true what was said on national television, we have a lot of questions for the entities that broadcast this and we’ll be talking with Brendan Carr from the FCC about this.”

“This could be much worse than than the Janet Jackson wardrobe malfunction, let’s put it that way,” Alford added.“But at least that was a malfunction, I mean this was apparently intentional,” the host Gina Loudon, a former Trump campaign surrogate who once appeared on the reality show Wife Swap, said. “This was intentional, yes” Alford said.

“And they could not have said this were it in English,” Loudon added, apparently also unaware that the explicit lyrics had not been heard on the broadcast, before calling the show “fully not understandable to English-speaking people”.

The host then praised Alford for his work – investigating things that did not happen. “Congressman Mark Alford, always on top of it,” Loudon said. “Thank you so much for being here.”

How dare you sing in Spanish and clean up the lyrics of a song I don’t understand making us look even more ridiculous than we already did? I’m so offended!