Skip to content

Author: tristero

Republicans Have Mandated Sexual Assaults on Women by tristero

Republicans Have Now Mandated Sexual Assaults on Women 

by tristero

You think I’m exaggerating:

St. Louis ob-gyn Amy Addante tweeted this week about the real-world effect of the requirements being imposed on patients and doctors at the last clinic performing abortions in Missouri. 

“Today,” the doctor wrote, “I was forced by the state of Missouri to perform an unnecessary pelvic exam on a patient terminating her pregnancy for a fetal anomaly. She is heartbroken over her situation, and I was forced to do an invasive, uncomfortable exam. It broke me as a physician to do this to her.”

To her, not for her. Not for any medical reason, but to keep the clinic open, at least for now.

On her show, Rachel Maddow reports that this “exam” — which again, Republicans in Missouri have mandated —  entails a doctor inserting fingers and “other instruments” into a person’s vagina for no medical reason whatsoever.

First, they came for the Muslims. Then they locked children in cages. Now, they’re mandating that doctors sexually assault their patients.

And there is no end in sight.

Impeach! Just Come Out and Say it!! by tristero

Impeach! Just Come Out and Say it!! 

by tristero

The editorial board of the NY Times (and others) have been hinting more and more strongly that they are in favor of impeachment. Today, Ian Prasad Philbrick, described as “on the editorial staff of the Opinion section” published articles of impeachment against Trump based on the Nixon and Clinton impeachment articles. This is not direct enough.

It’s time for Dean Baquet, Marty Baron, and other media leaders to just come out and say it: impeachment proceedings against Donald Trump (and many others in his administration) are more than warranted. Doing a Mueller “wink wink nudge nudge” is simply unacceptable. It implies the problem isn’t as serious as they clearly know it is (but are afraid to say so).

Should the major media come out openly for impeachment, it will surely serve to embolden the unconscionably feckless Democrats who are inching closer to impeachment but so slowly it may be too late before they take action.

And wow, do they ever need more embolden-osity.  Even now, the Democratic leadership truly believes that if they give Trump enough lebensraum he’ll self-destruct. He won’t. The strategy they’re pursuing has a name. It’s called appeasement and appeasement never works:.

When the British first got wind of the new German chancellor, he seemed so vulgar as to be harmless. Described by one British paper as a “stubby little Austrian with a flabby handshake, shifty brown eyes and a Charlie Chaplin mustache,” Hitler cut an uninspiring and ridiculous figure. 

Within a month, he had used a fire in the Reichstag to suspend parts of Germany’s constitution. A month after that, the Nazis announced a boycott of Jewish shops. Germany started to rearm and rebuild its military in ways that were illegal under the provisions of Versailles…

Every time Germany or Mussolini’s Italy upped the ante — becoming ever more demanding and brazen — the British had to ask themselves whether the latest transgression was serious enough to merit a “preventive war...” 

Hitler kept presenting himself as a man of peace, even if “Mein Kampf,” his bellicose, self-aggrandizing autobiography, suggested otherwise. The English translations of the book were expurgated versions, omitting the nastiest passages. “Mein Kampf” had also been published in 1925, years before Hitler had attained the dignified position of chancellor; those who wanted to could simply dismiss the book as intemperate juvenilia. 

Bouverie’s chronological narrative conveys how appeasement transformed over the years: from a reactive, fearful policy to an enthusiastic, idealistic project to what can only be deemed a strenuous exercise in willful denial

Sincerity typically requires consistency, but somehow Hitler’s volatility worked in his favor. He became so prone to tantrums that even when he talked to the British ambassador in Berlin about “annihilating Poland,” the relative lack of “the usual histrionics” meant that the genocidal comment wasn’t taken as an immediate threat. Hitler was constantly graded on a curve

If the Times, the Post, and many others stopped dithering and told what they know is the truth — that this president has to be removed from office before an existential catastrophe occurs — perhaps the Democratic leaders will wake up.

This is very, very serious, folks.

NY Times: Democrats Don’t Matter by tristero

NY Times: Democrats Don’t Matter 

by tristero

The lede to a New York Times story on tariffs. There’s something missing here:

President Trump’s threat to punish Mexico with tariffs until it restrains the flow of migrants rattled financial markets on Friday, and the Mexican government, American businesses and Republican lawmakers pressed Mr. Trump to back down.

Where are the Democrats? In case you’re interested, they’re first mentioned in paragraph 17.

To some extent, this is as much on Democrats as it is on Swanson and the Times’s editors (which is not to let them off the hook). It’s a matter of pushing reporters to cover Democrats and crafting statements that compel attention and therefore, prominent inclusion.

Republicans know better than to waste any opportunity to trash Democrats and get mentioned. When he was president, not an article was written about an Obama policy that didn’t include a prominent Republican scare quote. And I’m certain it never took the Times seventeen paragraphs before getting around to mentioning them.

PS: This article was in the most important spot in the print version, more prominent than the horrific Virginia Beach shooting.

Incurious and Lied To by tristero

Incurious and Lied To 

by tristero

Last night, Maddow mentioned this little telling anecdote:

Cathy Garnaat, a Republican who supported Amash and the president said she was upset about Amash’s position but wanted to hear his reasoning. She said that she will definitely support Trump in 2020 but that Tuesday night was the first time she had heard that the Mueller report didn’t completely exonerate the president. 

“I was surprised to hear there was anything negative in the Mueller report at all about President Trump. I hadn’t heard that before,” she said. “I’ve mainly listened to conservative news and I hadn’t heard anything negative about that report and President Trump has been exonerated.”

Think about what Cathy’s saying for a moment: Cathy supported Trump. Cathy never heard before that there was anything negative in the Mueller report. But she will definitely support Trump in the future.

Okay… That’s the equivalent of saying, “I really like to smoke 2 packs a day. I never heard that smoking 2 packs a day will kill me. But because I never heard it before, I’ll definitely continue to smoke 2 packs a day.”

Phishing for Gynecology by tristero

Phishing for Gynecology


by tristero

From The Guardian:

A popular women’s health and fertility app sows doubt about birth control, features claims from medical advisers who are not licensed to practice in the US, and is funded and led by anti-abortion, anti-gay Catholic campaigners, a Guardian investigation has found. 

The Femm app, which collects personal information about sex and menstruation from users, has been downloaded more than 400,000 times since its launch in 2015, according to developers. It has users in the US, the EU, Africa and Latin America, its operating company claims. 

Two of the app’s medical advisers are not licensed to practice in the US and are also closely tied to a Catholic university in Santiago, Chile, where access to abortion remains severely restricted. 

Femm receives much of its income from private donors including the Chiaroscuro Foundation, a charity backed almost exclusively by Sean Fieler, a wealthy Catholic hedge-funder based in New York. 

Fieler’s foundation has long supported organizations – and politicians such as the vice-president, Mike Pence – that oppose birth control and abortion. Fieler has criticized Republicans for failing to outlaw abortion, calling their reticence “the tyranny of moderation” in a recent editorial. 

The Chiaroscuro Foundation, with Fieler as its chairman and main backer, provided $1.79m to the developers of the Femm app over the last three years, according to IRS statements. Fieler also sits on the board of directors for the Femm Foundation, a not-for-profit which operates the app. 

The Femm app does not readily disclose the philosophy of its funders or leaders, and markets itself as a way to “avoid or achieve pregnancy”. 

Other fertility apps have been criticized for monetizing intimate data, sharing data with third parties and lack of privacy protections. Femm has not been accused of such behaviour, but appears to be the first ideologically aligned fertility app. 

The Femm app’s literature sows doubt about the safety and efficacy of hormonal birth control, asserting that it may be deleterious to a woman’s health and that a safer, “natural” way for women to avoid pregnancy is to learn their cycles.

The nausea this cynical tactic induces is mixed with serious alarm.

Femm merely got exposed. There surely are many, many more apps and online initiatives out there collecting information purely for ideological purposes. And it is only a matter of time before shaming, blackmail, extortion, or worse becomes a major problem. And not just about reproductive tactics, but about anything that thoroughly decent people would want to keep private and only share with trusted others.

Question by tristero

Question 

by tristero

What prevents Robert Mueller from simply saying:

“We couldn’t fully prove Trump’s campaign conspired with the Russians during the election, but we came very close. What we did prove, multiple times, was that Trump and others close to him did obstruct justice by, among other things, lying to investigators and shutting down investigations.

“Since the Justice Department won’t allow us to indict a sitting president, we recommend, strongly, that Congress initiate impeachment immediately.

“Furthermore, we recommend that the US take immediate concrete steps to ensure that no foreign power can do what Russia did in 2016 or worse.”

The Dumbest Thing Said Today By a Very Serious Person by tristero

The Dumbest Thing Said Today By a Very Serious Person 

by tristero

Ivan Krastev in the NY Times:

For the moment, supporters of the European Union don’t need to panic.

Bullshit. And he knows it. From the same essay:

Of the five individual political parties with the biggest representation in the new European Parliament, four are anti-European Union. 

…there is no choice but to admit that the populist far right is becoming a permanent feature of European politics.

I wasn’t born until long after the Holocaust. But I am quite aware of what happened the last time the populist far right became a permanent feature of European politics – 8 million people were slaughtered. Now is exactly the right time to panic.

Krastev also wins an award for The Second Dumbest Thing Said Today By a Very Serious Person. From the same article:

None of these [far right] parties seems any longer to support exiting the European Union or the eurozone. Instead, they want to change it from within.

Bullshit. They’re not interested in change, but destruction. Just wait.

Better yet, Europeans who care about the future of the world need to do whatever they can to get these people out of power fast.

Distorting the Truth About Growing Anti-Semitism When The Facts are Staring You in the Face by tristero

Distorting the Truth About Growing Anti-Semitism When The Facts are Staring You in the Face

by tristero

False equivalence at work in in the NY Times editorial offices:

For years, Europe maintained the comforting notion that it was earnestly confronting anti-Semitism after the horrors of the Holocaust. It now faces the alarming reality that anti-Semitism is sharply on the rise, often from the sadly familiar direction of the far right, but also from Islamists and the far left.

Whoever wrote this is consciously aware that is simply not so.

The clear implication is that anti-Semitism is becoming as influential and visible among “Islamists” and the “far left” as it is among the far right. But that is a gross and deliberate distortion of the facts.  And I’m being kind here, because the proceeding grafs say this:

The worrisome trend was underscored by a report issued by the German government this month showing that anti-Semitic incidents in Germany had increased by almost 20 percent in 2018 from the previous year, to 1,799, with 69 classified as acts of violence. The most common offense was the use of the swastika and other illegal symbols; the rest ranged from online incitement and insults to arson, assault and murder. 

Of the total, the report attributed 89 percent of the incidents to the far right. 

Despite this —  the use of the swastika, a far right symbol and the fact that nearly every single anti-Semitic offense reported was perpetrated by the far right — despite this, the Times writer(s) nevertheless repeat their utterly false equivalence of right, left, and Muslim:

What is clear is that these strains of anti-Semitism — from the right, from the left and from radical Muslims — have morphed into a resurgence of a blight that should have been eradicated long ago, and that is causing serious anxiety among Europe’s Jews.

What this does is minimize the exceedingly dangerous anti-Semitic actions of the far right, an extremist movement that currently has vastly greater political power throughout Europe and the US than any left-leaning or Islamist movement. And by minimizing the fact that anti-Semitism is an explicitly rightwing program, the Times misses the point, the rise in hateful actions directed against Jews and Muslims.

Look at it this way: although the term “anti-Semitism” is usually used to refer to hatred of Jews,  Semites include both Jews and Muslims, according to Webster’s. Because (not coincidentally) both groups are the object of hateful actions by the far right in Europe and the US, it makes sense to combine incidents against  Muslims and Jews together into the expression of a single bigotry. And if they were — if the statistics regarding the increase in anti-Muslim and anti-Jewish attacks were combined — the real danger of far right hate crimes would be much clearer.

The growth in theses dangerous incidents is a profoundly troubling problem and of course, bigoted, hateful actions are not confined to a single political/cultural/religious ideology. But the most prominent haters, the ones with real power to oppress and harm Jews and Muslims in Europe and the US are overwhelmingly from the right wing: white identity authoritarians who have taken over (or are poised to take over) many of the largest and most powerful nations in the world.

In short, the problem of bigoted hate crimes today, including anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim actions, remains primarily a right wing problem, the Times knows it, and yet they appear to have gone out of their way to avoid appearing to say so.

The Lord Helps Those Who Help Themselves by tristero

The Lord Helps Those Who Help Themselves 

by tristero

Dear Speaker Pelosi,

You said,

Again, I pray for the president of the United States. I wish that his family, or his administration, or his staff would have an intervention for the good of the country.

Praying is not enough. You are saying that the president of the United States is of an unsound mind. There could not be a more dangerous situation than a United States led by a president who is behaving like a lunatic.


You, Speaker Pelosi, have the power to do something about this and avert unimaginable catastrophe.

This is not a question of politics or principle. You are saying that Trump poses an existential threat to the country and the world. Therefore, you must do everything in your power to get him out of office. Now.

With your prayers and concerns about his mental health, you yourself have made a powerful case for getting Trump out of office. For the good of the country, you must stage an intervention by starting impeachment proceedings against Donald Trump immediately.

Love,

tristero