Chris Hayes has this one right. Nobody should think they have the “one true analysis” of the election or the “one true path” going forward. Shit happens.
"what digby sez..."
Digby's Hullabaloo Posts
They’re going to go after all of them:
One of Trump’s Day One executive actions is expected to be an order on so-called interior enforcement, arresting and detaining immigrants in the U.S. illegally, the sources said.
Trump intends to scrap Biden administration guidance that prioritized people with serious criminal records for deportation and limited enforcement against non-criminals, they said.
The Trump order would call for deportations to prioritize people charged with felonies and people who have exhausted their legal avenues to remain, but would not restrict officers from picking up other potentially deportable immigrants.
An estimated 1.4 million immigrants in the U.S. have final deportation orders, according to ICE, a group that will be a focus for the incoming Trump administration.
“A federal judge said, ‘You must go home,’ and they didn’t,” Homan told Fox News on Monday.
Certain groups – such as international students who support Palestinian militant group Hamas and have violated the terms of their student visas – could also be listed as a priority, two of the sources said.
ICE could use military planes in deportations and seek help from other government agencies to transport deportees, one source said. “All options are on the table,” the source said.
Another order would deal with border security, the two sources said. Trump intends to send National Guard troops to the border and declare illegal immigration a national emergency to unlock funds for border wall construction, the sources said.
Wall construction in Arizona – where Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs has opposed Republican enforcement efforts – could be a priority, two sources said.
Trump plans to end Biden’s temporary humanitarian “parole” programs, which have allowed hundreds of thousands of migrants to enter legally and access work permits, the sources said.
The programs include an initiative for certain migrants with U.S. sponsors and another that allows migrants in Mexico to use an app to schedule border appointments.
Also, in case you were wondering we’re about to see a Nazified corruption bonanza:
The incoming Trump administration is considering locations and talking to private prison companies about drastically expanding immigrant detention centers that would hold immigrants before they are deported as part of President-elect Donald Trump’s promised mass deportation plan, two sources familiar with the planning told NBC News.
The goal is to double the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention beds — 41,000 are now allocated by Congress — to hold vast numbers of migrants for short periods of time while they await deportation after their arrests inside the U.S., the sources said.
The plan would also include restarting the policy of detaining parents with their children, known as family detention, which immigration advocates have criticized and the Biden administration stopped in 2021, the sources said.
So far, people working on the plans with the Trump transition team are assessing which of the facilities the Biden administration closed could be reopened, taking account of available space in county jails and assessing which areas might need temporary facilities to detain migrants as part of the deportation effort.
Trump’s transition team is looking at how many migrants each region can hold, including in Democratic-controlled metropolitan areas across the country. A source familiar with the plans said they prioritize areas with large migrant populations that lack detention facilities, rather than single out Democratic strongholds.
Cities with large populations of migrants — like Denver, Los Angeles, Miami and Chicago — could need additional detention sites built nearby to hold migrants arrested there. The administration might also need to reopen, expand or build new facilities in the Northeast to hold migrants arrested around New York City, Philadelphia and Washington, the source said.
Homan has assured everyone that there is no plan for camps. But he didn’t say anything about prisons.
This may sound far-fetched but I’m fairly sure that Trump is dead serious about this one and I don’t know who is going to stop him. Even if the Supreme Court says no (which is unlikely) he will almost cettainly say, “you and what army?” This is one of his few fundamental policies that he really cares about. And it serves the double purpose of proving that he’s the toughest, meanest asshole on the planet which he translates to respect. He will do this.
I don’t know about you but this strikes me as very bad. Remember this is the guy who pardoned war criminals in his first administration and overruled the military chain of command to do it. He has expressly said that he wants to use the military to shoot protesters and round up immigrants. If we are depending on the military to resist illegal orders I’m not sure there will be any left to do it:
The Trump transition team is considering a draft executive order that establishes a “warrior board” of retired senior military personnel with the power to review three- and four-star officers and to recommend removals of any deemed unfit for leadership. If Donald Trump approves the order, it could fast-track the removal of generals and admirals found to be “lacking in requisite leadership qualities,” according to a draft of the order reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. But it could also create a chilling effect on top military officers, given the president-elect’s past vow to fire “woke generals,” referring to officers seen as promoting diversity in the ranks at the expense of military readiness.
As commander in chief, Trump can fire any officer at will, but an outside board whose members he appoints would bypass the Pentagon’s regular promotion system, signaling across the military that he intends to purge a number of generals and admirals.
The draft order says it aims to establish a review that focuses “on leadership capability, strategic readiness, and commitment to military excellence.” The draft doesn’t specify what officers need to do or present to show if they meet those standards. The draft order originated with one of several outside policy groups collaborating with the transition team, and is one of numerous executive orders under review by Trump’s team, a transition official said.
The warrior board would be made up of retired generals and noncommissioned officers, who would send their recommendations to the president. Those identified for removal would be retired at their current rank within 30 days.
The establishment of the board would be in line with Trump’s calls for purging what he views as failed generals, including those involved in the chaotic 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan, according to people familiar with the policy discussions. Trump has said he would ask all generals involved in the withdrawal to resign by “noon on Inauguration Day.”
The president-elect previewed the move during a campaign event in October, telling an audience that he would create a task force to monitor the “woke generals” and get rid of diversity training in the military. “They’re gone,” Trump said of those generals, without naming specific officers.
One feared potential target of Trump’s threatened purge could be Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr., the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to two defense officials. During the 2020 George Floyd protests, Brown spoke about the impact that movement had on him and what it was like to rise through the military ranks as a Black fighter pilot.
Yeah, a Black Chairman of the Joint Chiefs isn’t going to fly in the Trump adminstration. Not even if it’s a Black fighter pilot who I’m sure Trump and his cronies consider a DEI hire despite his record.
This is pretty scary stuff. I suspect there are plenty of people in the officer corps who think it’s terrific, however, and will be more than happy to take their places and line up with whatever Dear Leader wants them to do. Don’t ever think that the US Military isn’t full of General Buck Turgidsons.
It’s been a week since the election of Donald Trump and the shock is just now beginning to wear off. The ritual Democratic self-flagellation is calming a bit as most people finally take a breath and recognize that while the result was a terrible disappointment it was anything but a landslide for Donald Trump, nor was it a crushing rebuke of the Democratic party.
As Philip Bump of The Washington Post points out in this preliminary analysis:
“Trump’s popular-vote victory will likely end up as the smallest since 2000. It is due, in part, to fewer people voting. Exit polls are imperfect, but they suggest where each party gained and lost votes since 2020…What we can say, though, is that this was not an electoral landslide, but a narrowly contested race in which Trump is likely to have benefited as much from who didn’t turn out to vote for his candidacy than who did turn out to vote for him.
Right now, the first order of business is to shake off the defeat and confront the challenge of Donald Trump’s ghastly agenda. As we have seen in the last few days it’s shaping up to be both more chaotic and more extreme than even in 2016.
Last time, Trump at least had a transition team put together by his transition chief former Gov. Chris Christie in place, even if he threw most of their plan out almost immediately. They held meetings in Trump Tower in New York to vet candidates and policies in a more or less formal atmosphere. Now they’re meeting at Mar-a-Lago in free-wheeling gab sessions around the golf course and the dining table at the resort. Apparently, Elon Musk is a fixture, “weighing in on staffing decisions, making clear his preference for certain roles,”
As you’ve no doubt heard by now, Trump has been wasting no time in naming his cabinet members and other staff. Musk himself was named, along with former presidential primary candidate Vivek Rammaswamy (who has also been in attendance in transition meetings) to head an outside advisory board they’re calling the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. (Both Musk and Ramaswamy think that acronym is adorable because it’s an older internet meme and a cryptocurrency in which Musk is heavily invested. The techno boys are having a rousing good time. By the look of that lunch table above, Trump is spending most of his time golfing and tweeting, as usual.
The other cabinet officials chosen so far have been typical Trump toadies and henchmen such as his former acting Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe to CIA, S. Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem to DHS, and former Congressman Lee Zeldin to the EPA. They did cause a stir on Tuesday when they named Fox News personality Pete Hegseth, for Defense Secretary whose main qualification for the job appears to be pushing Trump to pardon war criminals. Who knows who this braintrust is going to choose for Attorney General and Secretary of State? There have been some semi-respectable names floated but there are also some Hegseth level choices as well.
This explains why Trump is demanding that the new Senate Majority Leader, whoever that runs out to be, will ensure that his nominations are handled by recess appointments rather than the usual constitutionally required confirmation process. It’s very possible that even with a 53 vote majority, they couldn’t get some of these unqualified extremists passed.
It’s clear they plan to hit the ground running with the mass deportation agenda. Trump has already officially named his “Border Czar,” an unofficial position he apparently plans on imbuing with immense power, Tom Homan a former border patrol official best known for fashioning Trump’s family separation policy. He has been all over TV assuring America that he plans to deport every undocumented immigrant and he’ll use whatever force it takes to do it, including the military.
At this point it’s hard to know what Democrats in Washington will be able to do to push back on any of this. The Senate will be in Republican hands so the confirmation of Trump’s cabinet and judges are pretty much a done deal. It’s still possible that the Democrats could control the House although it’s a long shot. If that happens budgets and appropriations will have a necessary check. Otherwise, it’s a GOP candy store.
As for the other branch, the judiciary, we don’t know for sure what the Supreme Court would definitely do should anyone try to stop Trump’s appalling agenda from coming to fruition but we do know that they believe virtually nothing he does could possibly be criminal so he pretty much has a free hand. However, in our federalist system there is another institutional check on his power and that’s in the states. And in those that are run by Democrats we are already seeing a strong pushback, which they have been planning for months in case Trump managed to do the unthinkable again.
Gov. Gavin Newsom of California immediately called a special legislative session to shore up the state’s legal defenses to challenge Trump’s plans around the environment, reproductive and LGBTQ rights and immigration. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker held a news conference two days after the election and put the President elect on notice, saying “To anyone who intends to come take away the freedom and opportunity and dignity of Illinoisans: I would remind you that a happy warrior is still a warrior. You come for my people, you come through me.”
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Leticia James pledged to “protect New Yorkers’ fundamental freedoms from any potential threats.” Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey, who made her name as Attorney General filing lawsuits against the first Trump administration, said she would defend the freedoms of her people “in the face of any attempted federal overreach.”
Democratic states passed laws protecting reproductive health care, stockpiled abortion pills and got as many protections for threatened constituencies as they could on the November ballots. These governors are reportedly talking among themselves about how to get promised federal funding for state projects into their treasuries before Trump takes over. He has, after all, explicitly threatened to withhold aid if any Governor balks at his plans.
And he’s not happy at all about this. He called out Newsom in a rambling Truth Social post:
At the moment, the push back from these lawmakers will be done through lawsuits. But you have to wonder what the new “Border Czar”, who insists that he will have the military at his disposal, means when he says that governors from sanctuary states have to “get the hell out of the way” and if they don’t “we may have to double the number of agents we send to New York City.” Is he planning on having an armed stand off with the state police or something?
Whether the Big Blue states have the ability to successful push back Trump’s larger agenda is unlikely. Unless the courts are amenable, which is a crap shoot these days, Trump will likely be able to get away with much of it if he can find the wherewithal to actually get it done. But it’s hard to imagine that even his loony crew will allow Tom Homan to send the military into New York and LA to roust immigrants in their homes against the wishes of the state and local authorities. So there is a pretty good chance that these governors can “Trump proof” their states and at least stymie his plans in the big population centers. We’d better hope they can do it. It’s pretty much all we’ve got.
We were Trumpified before Trump
Self-flagellation over the 2024 presidential race loss continues among Democrats. It is fueled by simplistic press narratives that I hear as: Millions face violent deportation, Ukrainians face losing their country, Gazans face continued slaughter, and the world faces the collapse of NATO and the rise of fascism American-style because Democrats have a messaging problem. The 75 million whose votes empower those outcomes? Their hands are clean.
Brian Beutler is not buying it either:
For all the unfolding recrimination, a fairly strong consensus has already formed across the left that last week’s election results are part of a global, post-Covid, post-inflation backlash against incumbents. And for what it’s worth, I agree with this consensus; Occam’s razor applies too neatly to start the analysis elsewhere.
Operative word: start. The information environment itself is a place to continue:
For instance:
- If nothing about the information environment changes between now and Inauguration Day, I predict Trump will quickly claim credit for the economy he inherited, and for economic sentiment to shoot upward, as millions of Republicans reverse their stated views on the material world.
- Once he’s in power, I suspect many, many Trump-aligned or Trump-sympathetic media figures will trash their old scripts and either start talking about how many groceries they can afford all of a sudden, or simply stop talking about the economic status quo at all.
- If Trump’s policies or corporate blackmail practices don’t reduce prices, or if prices go up, I suspect he and his aligned media will blame all the hardship on Biden from the outset, that about half of Americans will come to believe this, and that Democrats will be ill-equipped to deliver a louder, simpler, more accurate message. It’s not that I think Trump would be completely immune from backlash to another burst of inflation, but that the bottom wouldn’t fall out from under him the way it fell out from under Biden.
“Working the refs” was once an art. Under Democrats’ noses, the right has made it a science. (They won’t call it that, of course.) The right attacks. The left fails to respond, resulting in what this TikToker finds:
Charlie Sykes is also skeptical of the emerging narrative.
“Apparently, the Democrats have decided to bypass the autopsy and move straight to an orgy of self-flagellation,” he begins. He agrees with a lot of the criticism of Democrats but sees it in a broader context of what won out: Trump’s amorality, Republicans’ ethical collapse, “the utter failure of the criminal justice system,” and journalism’s failure as fearless truth-tellers.
About those 75 million Trump voters?
I know that it is now unfashionable to criticize the wisdom and sagacity of American voters, but this ought not be sanewashed as a normal choice in a rational or sane democracy.3 When we are done flagellating other institutions, we need to admit the possibility that something is profoundly broken in the American psyche and character.
For decades we have told ourselves stories about American exceptionalism and leadership — a beacon of freedom and democracy to the world. And, indeed, we remain the world’s greatest superpower.
But we found out last week that we are a profoundly unserious country.
Americans, those lovers of freedom, TikTok and reality TV, chose a profoundly unserious man for dictator-in-waiting. He’s already making predictably unserious choices for his administration.
Sykes references an observation by Neil Postman that I hadn’t seen elsewhere:
Four decades ago, Neil Postman prophesied an apocalypse of moral idiocy in the age of mass media. “When a population becomes distracted by trivia,” he wrote, in Amusing Ourselves to Death, “when cultural life is redefined as a perpetual round of entertainments, when serious conversation becomes a form of baby-talk, when, in short, a people becomes an audience and their public business a vaudeville act, then a nation finds itself at risk; culture-death is a clear possibility.”
To wit:
Our national idiocracy was a pre-existing condition just waiting for the coming of a cynical demagogue like Trump. Our guardrails and norms proved to be far more fragile than we imagined, because they had been hollowed out and dumbed down.
Postman wrote that Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World” was more likely where our world was headed than George Orwell’s “1984.” Postman wrote:
What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny “failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.” In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we desire will ruin us.
This book is about the possibility that Huxley, not Orwell, was right.”
Kurt Vonnegut was more memorable. Welcome to the monkey house. Only in Vonnegut’s future, people were numb from the waist down.
Mr. Insecurity picks a Fox News host for SecDef
Donald Trump proved critics right again on Tuesday.
All this time I thought one of strongest motivators for Donald (Mr. Insecurity) Trump’s was to get the world to stop “laughing at us” (him). It’s considered one of the reasons he ran for president after sitting through some skillful mocking at the 2011 White House Correspondents’ Dinner. “Saturday Night Live” comedian Seth Meyers and President Obama (Did you know he’s Black?) both roasted Trump as unserious.
“Donald Trump has been saying he will run for president as a Republican — which is surprising, since I just assumed he was running as a joke,” Meyers jabbed as Trump sat stone-faced.
“That evening of public abasement, rather than sending Mr. Trump away, accelerated his ferocious efforts to gain stature within the political world,” wrote Maggie Haberman and Alexander Burns after the 2016 Super Tuesday primaries. “And it captured the degree to which Mr. Trump’s campaign is driven by a deep yearning sometimes obscured by his bluster and bragging: a desire to be taken seriously.”
I’ll show you (and get even, more than even), Trump thought. Now headed into his second term as president after President Joe Biden’s interregnum, Trump means to show the world just how serious he is.
So Trump on Tuesday announced Pete Hegseth, a “Fox & Friends Weekend” co-host, as his next secretary of defense. Hegseth has for years hosted host Fox’s New Year’s coverage. No, seriously.
President-elect Donald Trump’s Tuesday night surprise pick of a conservative commentator and television host as his Pentagon chief shocked Washington, which had expected the nominee to be a seasoned lawmaker or someone with defense policy experience.
National security officials and defense analysts had braced for surprises from Trump after experiencing his first four years in office. But even grading on that curve, they say the announcement of Fox News host and decorated Army veteran Pete Hegseth caught them totally off-guard.
“[Trump] puts the highest value on loyalty,” Eric Edelman, who served as the Pentagon’s top policy official during the Bush administration, said in an interview. “It appears that one of the main criteria that’s being used is, how well do people defend Donald Trump on television?”
One assessment was more blunt. “Who the fuck is this guy?” said a defense industry lobbyist who was granted anonymity to offer candid views. The lobbyist said they had hoped for “someone who actually has an extensive background in defense. That would be a good start.”
Yup, that will show ’em. That will stop “them” from laughing at “us.” This guy:
This means you
Jeff Sharlett dove into Hegseth’s book, “War on Warriors,” and found, per the introduction, Sharlet tweets, that Hegseth believes “the military is anti-white, conquered by a ‘diverse’ ‘infection’ intent on breaking the military–which would be treason. Which justifies the self-declared ‘extremism’ of his response.”
Yeah, when Trump orders him to have troops to shoot protesters in the legs, Hegseth would only ask, “How many times?”
Politico:
The top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Adam Smith of Washington, expressed concern that Hegseth doesn’t have the experience to tackle the Pentagon bureaucracy.
“I confess I didn’t know who he was until 20 minutes ago,” Smith told reporters. “And he certainly doesn’t seem to have any background whatsoever in DOD policy.”
He also said he’s concerned about a Pentagon chief without extensive relationships with allies at a time when the U.S. has “a lot of irons in the fire” in Asia, Europe and the Middle East.
“I see no evidence that this person has relationships whatsoever with our overseas partners,” Smith said. “How is he going to do when working on the various coalitions that we have?”
Trump doesn’t care so long as Hegseth’s lips are firmly attached to his ass.
Christmas just came early for Moscow, Pyongyang, and Beijing.
[Sorry, server maintenance delayed the post this morning.]
John Oliver on Trump’s cabinet short list:
Talk of who will fill President-elect Donald J. Trump’s new Cabinet has already inspired rampant speculation, and a chart of potential picks from CNN revealed “a deep bench of idiots, freaks and wannabe tough guys,” according to John Oliver.
“That chart f—ing sucks,” The Last Week Tonight host said Sunday. “It looks like a ‘choose your fighter’ screen where the only thing they’re fighting is the arc of the moral universe. It looks like an advent calendar where every circle opens up to a tiny piece of literal shit. It looks like a game board for Guess Who? Oops! All a–holes.”
No doubt about it.
I totally identify with this rant by Oliver. No it is not easier. It’s horrible:
I don’t think people realize that exit polls are just polls. They’re good, as polls go, because they ask a lot of people what they think and what they voted for on the day of the election. But it takes several months for the numbers crunchers to adjust and analyse the data alongside the actual results and it is often substantially different than what we thought on the morning after the election.
Anyway, Ryan Cooper at the American Prospect suggests that we put our hair shirts in the closet for the time being and deal with the fact that half of the American public has no idea what they’re in for:
Now that Donald Trump has won, again, a furious debate on the left side of the political spectrum has erupted, as Democratic Party factions jostle for position by casting blame on everyone but themselves. For my part, while I can’t help but have some suspicions, it will be six months before we have detailed data on where demographics actually landed, and at time of writing California is not even done counting. Any serious conclusions are premature at this point.
A more interesting conundrum, however, is the maddening fact that Trump paid little or no electoral penalty for his numerous hideously unpopular positions. A developing body of evidence suggests that a critical mass of voters simply did not hear about these positions, or did not believe them if they did. (The most bleak thread in this story are interviews with unauthorized immigrants who say they would have voted for Trump if they could, assuming that surely he would not deport them, as they’re honest and hardworking folks.)
Broadly speaking, it seems this decisive stratum of the electorate (the don’t-knows or those who dismissed Trump’s positions) was dissatisfied with the status quo under President Biden for one reason or another, and cast a protest vote for Trump, assuming things will turn out about as they did during his first term. These people are about to learn the hard way how wrong they were.
He does an excellent run down of the whole agenda and it’s as terrifying as we thought. But he brings up something I haven’t heard mentioned much and it’s truly astonishing:
A more uncertain danger, but perhaps riskiest of all, would be a crypto meltdown leading to a general financial panic. During the campaign, Trump did an about-face and became a big crypto guy because the industry gave him tons of money. Now, the industry is certain to avoid any serious regulation under his watch. And like any Republican, Trump is certain to install Wall Street stooges in the SEC and other regulators.
From a 30,000 foot view, crypto is akin to the pre-New Deal securities market that produced phenomena like the deranged property speculation frenzy in Florida swamps from 1924-26, except without the swamps. It’s pure speculation and nothing else, where every type of financial scam is running rampant, perhaps because the post-2008 wariness about financial gambling has subsided, and young people today having no direct experience of the crash. Crypto fanatics are reacting jubilantly to the Trump victory, with Bitcoin surging well past $80,000 and retail investors flooding into crypto exchange traded funds (ETFs).
We already saw the risks of crypto with the bankruptcy of FTX and several other crypto firms in 2022, brought down by crimes on a Bernie Madoff-esque scale. But many keystone crypto institutions, above all the big stablecoins like Tether that are critical for moving money in and out of crypto, did not collapse during the panic. Tether’s balance sheet is comically suspicious, and even if it weren’t, if the history of finance teaches anything it’s that these kind of institutions always blow themselves up eventually unless government forces them to behave responsibly and protects them from self-fulfilling panics.
Over the last few years crypto haw insinuated itself into the financial system, with big firms like BlackRock offering crypto ETFs (which is also booming). So next year we are likely to have another rapidly inflating crypto bubble with essentially no regulation or oversight, only this time hooked into the normal financial system, with corrupt Trumper goons at the head of all the financial regulators. Even if they manage to bail out the big companies with tons of free taxpayer money, as Bush and Obama did in 2008, millions of regular people are going to lose their shirts.
I will confess that I find the whole crypto thing a bit mystifying and that’ backed up by professionals I know who call it a scam. But the Trump grifter family is all in on it so you can bet we’re not going to see any regulation of it. Good times ahead…
This is the kind of thing I’m going to be focusing on for the moment. I am not interested in self-flagellation and will be looking for better data on what happened in this election as time goes on. I doubt I’ll have any great insights into “what the Democrats have to do,” but I’ll pass on any that I think are worth sharing.
I do think I have some insight on what the Republicans are doing and I will be keeping an eye on all that as I have for the last 9 exhausting years. (Just when I thought I was out, he pulled me back in…)
As Cooper concludes:
This is far from a complete list of the horrors Trump might unleash during his second term. Whatever they turn out to be, it will be critical to pin the blame where it belongs.
Political scientist Brendan Nyhan:
People’s views about what elections “mean” are utterly incoherent. If you think this is a mandate, then Obama should have received total deference from the GOP and the media both times!
Quick and dirty GPT-made graph of popular vote for the president by year. Tell me if you can see the mandate!
Bush Jr said he had a mandate and immediately massively cut taxes for the rich. (“I got capital and I’m gonna use it!”) Trump had never heard the word and didn’t know what it meant. Now he’s claiming to have gotten the biggest landsliude victory in world history.
But it wouldn’t matter if he’d been installed by the Supremes like Bush was. He’ll do what he wants. And that’s because mandates are irrelevant to right wingers. Power is the coin of their realm and they will ruthlessly use whatever they have to achieve their goals.
Is Trump an peacenik Hitler? This voter thinks so:
In Scranton on Wednesday, Matt Wolfson, a 45-year-old former construction worker, looked around at poverty in the Rust Belt city and thought the nation needed a change in leadership.
Wolfson said he didn’t love the dictatorial aspect of Trump’s personality, but thought it could help keep the country out of wars and maybe bring peace to some other conflicts, including in Ukraine.
“He’s good and bad. People say he’s a dictator. I believe that. I consider him like Hitler,” Wolfson said. “But I voted for the man.”
I guess he thinks Hitler had his good points? Hey, nobody’s perfect, amirite?