President Javier Milei of Argentina promoted a cryptocurrency last year that quickly skyrocketed in value then cratered just as fast, costing investors millions of dollars and setting off a scandal and an investigation.
Mr. Milei said he was simply highlighting a private venture and had no connection to the digital coin called $Libra. New evidence is now raising questions about his assertion. Phone logs from a federal investigation by Argentine prosecutors into the coin’s collapse show seven phone calls between Mr. Milei and one of the entrepreneurs behind the cryptocurrency on the night in 2025 when Mr. Milei posted about $Libra on X.
The contents of the calls, which took place before and after Mr. Milei’s post, are not known.But the phone logs — which were obtained by The New York Times and first reported by a local cable news channel, C5N — suggest a greater degree of communication between Mr. Milei and the entrepreneurs who launched the token than what the president has publicly acknowledged. Newly uncovered messages also suggest Mr. Milei received regular payments from one of the entrepreneurs while he was a congressman.
Of course he’s corrupt. Why would anyone think otherwise? He’s a member of the global right wing and affiliated with Donald Trump.
The crypto scams are going to be one of the biggest stories of this period. I don’t know how long it’s going to take to completely unravel it but in the end we will find that these criminals stole billions from people who were clueless about what they were getting into. It’s a sad comment on our modern culture that people can’t see through these scams but far too many are dazzled by hucksters who promise wealth and vengeance and they’re going to end up with neither.
A brief notice from the Office of Personnel Management could dramatically change which personally identifiable medical information the agency obtains, giving it the power to see prescriptions employees had filled or what treatment they sought from doctors. The regulation would require 65 insurance companies that cover more than 8 million Americans — including federal workers, retired members of Congress, mail carriers, and their immediate family members — to provide monthly reports to OPM with identifiable health data on their members.
The proposal is prompting unease from insurers as well as health policy and legal experts, who are concerned about the legality of OPM acquiring such a sweeping database of sensitive health information, and the agency’s ability to safeguard it.
“You can anticipate a scenario where this information on 8 million Americans is now in the hands of OPM and there’s a real concern of how they use it,” said Michael Martinez, senior counsel at Democracy Forward, an advocacy organization that filed a public comment opposing OPM’s proposal in February. Martinez previously worked at OPM.
There is simply no doubt that they will misuse the data. That’s what they do.
The last I heard, HIPAA precludes anyone from sharing this information but we know that the law doesn’t apply to the Trump administration so never mind.
Hopefully, the courts will stop this too. But you never know.
The Wall St. Journal (gift link) takes a look at the state of America’s alliances in the wake of this latest trainwreck. If it was bad before it’s terrible today:
Crowning a year of disputes with the Trump administration over trade tariffs, support for Ukraine and the future of Greenland, the Iran war has placed America’s friends in Europe, Asia and the Middle East in front of an uneasy dilemma.
Their most important ally is acting in ways that they see as erratic and that have already caused hardship and uncertainty. The war has sapped their economies and even bigger shocks loom if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, deepening the worldwide energy crisis.
Many—on both sides of the Atlantic—wonder if they are even allies anymore. Angered by the refusal of European nations to join the war alongside the U.S. and Israel, President Trump has called European countries cowards, and threatened to withdraw from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization altogether.
“The United States is unpredictable,” said Roderich Kiesewetter, a lawmaker from Germany’s ruling party, echoing a widespread sentiment in Europe. “It’s not a reliable partner anymore for the Western world.”
The threats to take Greenland were the tipping point:
“This will never be forgotten,” said retired French Lt. Gen. Michel Yakovleff. “Psychologically, Trump talking about taking Greenland was the equivalent of a father talking, jokingly, of raping one of his daughters. Obviously, it’s a new world in the family after that.”
Well.
The problem is that until they can all arm up and retool, the US is still the only option:
“If you insult your allies and push them to the brink in every negotiation, if you present your ugliest face to the world, then this consent will evaporate,” Fullilove said. “But what is the alternative to the U.S.-led alliance system? The U.S. is the only country that can project power anywhere on Earth. Who else will lead the West, if not Washington?”
This Catch-22 is acutely felt by U.S. partners and allies in the Persian Gulf. With their cities subjected to daily Iranian missile and drone barrages, the Gulf states are most affected by the Iranian retaliation for a war that they didn’t start and whose course they cannot control.
We’ve closely watched the destruction of the NATO alliance for the past year but the big strain on the relationship with the Gulf states is more recent:
Gulf officials have grown frustrated with Trump—who, among other undiplomatic moves, publicly insulted Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman by saying last month, at a Saudi-sponsored investment conference, that the kingdom’s de-facto ruler “didn’t think he’d be kissing my ass.” Yet, these Gulf states also know that only Washington can provide them with crucial weapons, particularly air defenses, and offer protection from future Iranian attempts to dominate the region.
One can only assume that Trump’s TACO yesterday has caused even more consternation. Reportedly, Saudi Arabia was begging Trump to continue the war. Today, they’re still being targeted by Iran while Trump is talking about doing a deal to split the “fees” Iran is going to be charging to use the Strait of Hormuz.
Meanwhile, he’s blown up the Asian alliances as well:
South Korea, facing a threat from North Korea and an emboldened China, watched with dismay as the U.S. redeployed vital air-defense resources to the Middle East last month. “The action that the U.S. is engaged in in Iran not only reveals the U.S. as a rogue actor whose political values at home and internationally are no longer in accordance with South Korea’s professed values, but also one whose actions will have huge economic consequences,” said Mason Richey, a professor of international politics at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies in Seoul. “Yet, South Korea also needs to stay on the right side of the Trump administration for its own security purposes.”
[…]
At Monday’s news conference, Trump touted his good relationship with North Korea’s leader as he complained about South Korea’s refusal to join the war on Iran, and said that he still wants Greenland.
He’s nuts.
“Everyone is confused. Nobody can understand what America actually is today. It seems governed by some kind of mad emperor who keeps saying whatever comes to his mind, something we haven’t witnessed since Caligula or Nero,” said Carlo Calenda, an Italian senator and former economic development minister. “The one thing the Europeans have understood is that we are dealing with a bully. You can give him everything he wants, you can pretend you don’t hear his insults, but he will keep trying to bully us, and so at a certain point we must stop him.”
If only the Republican Party would have such an epiphany we might be able to save our country. I’m not holding my breath.
Donald Trump’s self-described “little excursion” in Iran has proved to be a march to disaster. His “major combat operation” has shifted from aiming to block Iran achieving a nuclear capability that was supposedly “obliterated” last June to unblocking the Strait of Hormuz and restoring the situation that existed before the operation began. Whatever the objective may be, the pre-war status quo is irretrievable.
Trump cannot declare victory and walk away without surrendering the vital shipping conduit to Iran. With its proven capacity to wreak havoc on the world economy, a bombed-out military-theocratic dictatorship has begun the final unravelling of US imperial power.
In the Middle East, the war has undercut the financial foundations of US hegemony. However the war ends, the result will be the re-emergence of Iran as a major power. As the arbiter of passage through Hormuz, Iran has become the deciding force in the global oil economy. If Trump opts to “finish the job” and launches a ground operation, the US will be dragged into a debacle larger than Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq combined.
While Nato may linger on in name, the transatlantic alliance is operationally defunct. America is returning to its pre-1914 trajectory as a civilisation separate from Europe. In the UK, the default position is to wait out the storm until sanity returns to Washington.
Why Putin or Xi Jinping should exhibit similar patience is not explained. Could there be a better time for them to act? Ramping up hybrid warfare in under-defended Europe will give Putin leverage in any peace deal in Ukraine. With Trump having shifted military assets from the Asia-Pacific to the Middle East and running down munitions, Xi may be able to absorb Taiwan without firing a shot.
This is not simply a case of the lessons of history being ignored. Trump’s war looks more like an example of what Sigmund Freud described as repetition compulsion – an unconscious process in which the mind acts out what it cannot properly remember. A creature of the moment as he may be, Trump seems driven by an impulse to reimagine the past and reassert American – and his own – greatness. When an infantile fantasy of omnipotence comes up against unyielding realities, the response is inchoate rage.
Psychopathology may be more illuminating than geopolitics at this point. In a more profound sense than is commonly recognised, Donald Trump does not know what he is doing.
His little excursion is a point of no return in America’s retreat as a global power.
Psychopathology?
Meanwhile on Cult TV:
Ingraham: It looks like Trump ultimately hits the home run here, takes it to the brink. Iran blinks.
Towery: When will the Democrats and some Republicans ever learn that the rhetoric he uses is done for a reason. And it works pic.twitter.com/a8xFv07W0B
JV Last summarized last night’s Iran debacle in a Bulwark livestream: “This entire thing was avoidable and predictable. Donald Trump made America walk into the diner to eat the shit sandwich.”
Republicans are on track for more at the polls this fall. They ate another last night in Wisconsin (Politico):
In Wisconsin’s Supreme Court election, the Democratic-backed candidate sailed to a nearly 20-point landslide victory Tuesday in a battleground Trump carried less than two years ago. Meanwhile, a Georgia Democrat slashed Trump’s margin of victory by two thirds in the state’s reddest district despite losing the election — the most significant overperformance the party has seen across all seven Housespecial elections so far this cycle.
Meaning Democrat Shawn Harris will not replace Georgia’s Marjorie Taylor Greene in the U.S. House. But political winds are not blowing in Republicans’ favor. Judge Chris Taylor, a Wisconsin liberal, won a seat on the state Supreme Court by 20 points over her Republican rival. Democrats will hold a 5-to-2 majority on the Wisconsin high court once she’s sworn in.
“It’s a wow moment in Wisconsin politics,” said former Republican strategist Brandon Scholz, who left the party in 2021. “Republicans ought to be sitting down tonight and going, ‘Okay, we just screwed up another race. What are we going to do in November?’”
Lose. And lose badly. Depending on what the lunatic in the Oval Office does between now and then to sabotage fall elections.
Republicans Politico quotes dismissed the losses as not indicative of what happens in November.
“Everyone involved should be doxxed, tarred and feathered and run out of Wisconsin politics,” the strategist said while dismissing the idea that the race result matters ahead of November.
“The electorate is so different now. GOP voters don’t show up for spring [elections] like they used to,” they said.
[…]
“Democrats threw everything they had at this race,” said Georgia Republican Party chair Josh McKoon. “They made this the Super Bowl and they lost.”
Anyway, Georgia Republicans have tricks up their sleeves for November. One county chair called last night seeking someone in North Carolina with experience running elections with hand-marked paper ballots. Georgia Republicans are still worked up over Dominion, Venezuela, pillow guy, Sydney Powell, and 11,780 votes, etc. Democracy Docket explained on April 3 what they mean to do about it:
Georgia election officials have less than three months to convert the state’s entire voting system from touchscreen machines to paper ballots, after the state Senate failed to vote Friday on legislation that would have delayed the conversion until 2028.
[…]
Georgia’s current touchscreen system generates QR codes for ballot counting. But in 2024 GOP state lawmakers voted to sunset these machines by July 1 of this year, making it illegal to use them beyond that. Last week, the state Senate passed a bill to change over to a completely hand-marked ballot system.
However, local election officials urged lawmakers to delay that switch until 2028 so that they would have time to put the new system in place, which would include pre-printing millions of ballots and re-training election workers.
Georgia state senators did not listen:
The state House passed a bipartisan bill this morning that would’ve allowed for that two-year grace period. But the Senate – led by Lt. Gov. Burt Jones (R), who is running for the GOP nomination for governor – declined to bring it forward for a vote Friday, the final day of this year’s legislative session.
Now comes the scramble. And likely court challenges. Georgia’s given boards of elections no time or funds to buy, validate/certify, train staff and implement a replacement hand-market ballot system before the fall. Chaos is legislated in:
Election officials also warn that the law’s new reporting requirements will cause delays in ballot counting and in delivering timely results. Those problems often trigger chaos, controversy and conspiracy theories, as seen in the fallout over Fulton County’s 2020 election ballot count, which is still being probed today.
North Carolina Republicans are not slackers on the chaos (“election integrity”) front, as Asheville Watchdog’s Tom Fiedler explains this morning.
HB 127, “camouflaged under the title ‘Voter Registration Drive Form’, ” means to prohibit voter registration form handling by anyone except county elections officials or the Division of Motor Vehicles. Fiedler explains, “Anybody else who provides voter-registration forms may as well be trafficking in illicit drugs as they face criminal prosecution.”
That would be un-American enterprises such as “the League of Women Voters and Common Cause, and such civil-rights groups as the A. Philip Randolph Institute and the youth-oriented Rock the Vote.” Fielder explains:
Jennifer Rubin, president of the North Carolina League of Voters, told an NCNews reporter that civic organizations like hers “are all for election security and for holding elections with integrity.” But what the Republicans are doing is “throwing up roadblocks to limit voting.
“It’s like a game of whack-a-mole,” Rubin said. “One thing happens and another pops up just to discourage people from voting.”
Conveniently, Republicans are running the bill’s sponsor, Rep. Sarah Stevens, for state Supreme Court against incumbent Democrat Anita Earls. With the six-month effort by Republican Judge Jefferson Griffin to steal the 2024 election he lost to Justice Allison Riggs fresh in voters’ minds — Earls called the attempt “a bloodless coup” — we’ll expect Stevens to have her face rubbed in her attempt to quash voter registration every week between now and November.
Watch this space and watch Georgia’s election struggles.
The United States and Iran announced a two-week cease-fire and plans to fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday evening, hours before a deadline set by President Trump, who had threatened to destroy Iran’s “whole civilization” unless it allowed free transit through the vital waterway.
The agreement, brokered by Pakistan, was hailed as a victory by both sides. Mr. Trump said a 10-point plan from Iran was a “workable basis on which to negotiate” a lasting end to the war, after demanding Tehran’s “unconditional surrender” for weeks. Iranian officials were triumphant, with Mohammad Reza Aref, the country’s first vice president, saying on social media that “the era of Iran” had begun after Trump failed to destroy the Islamic Republic’s government. Iran also said the Strait of Hormuz would remain open while negotiations took place.
As for Europeans giving the United States of Trump serious side-eye, Politico quotes an unnamed official who referenced Trump Always Chickens Out:
“Better TACO Tuesday than World War III,” said one European official, nodding to Trump backing off his threats to wipe out Iran’s civilization if it didn’t open the Strait of Hormuz. The official, who was not authorized to speak publicly, hoped the pause could allow for an eventual negotiated end to the war.
It’s a carnival of chaos this morning, and too much to summarize.
Secretary of WAR! Pete Hegseth just completed a press conference focused heavily on how many bombs the U.S. dropped and on a partial list of targets hit with no clearer definition of U.S. strategic aims:
“You’re trying to define victory by how many people you killed,” said Vali Nasr, an Iranian expert at Johns Hopkins University. “Its [sic] like a doctor who says, ‘I have a really sharp scalpel.’”
Why are we bombing Iran exactly? We still don’t know. But “Hegseth just called President Trump ‘a president of peace.’”
The question remains: What will Trump do when in the interim demands renew for a full release of the Epstein files? He’ll need another flashy distraction.
Also, “Gas prices could take months to fall significantly,” reports The Washington Post. So plan now for that $5/gallon staycation.
A drone maker backed by President Donald Trump’s two oldest sons is trying to sell to Gulf countries while they are under attack by Iran and dependent on the U.S. military led by their father.
The sales drive by Florida-based Powerus – which announced a deal last month to bring aboard Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. – positions the company to potentially benefit from a war that their father began.
“These countries are under enormous pressure to buy from the sons of the president so he will do what they want,” said Richard Painter, a former chief White House ethics lawyer under President George W. Bush. “This is going to be the first family of a president to make a lot of money off war — a war he didn’t get the consent of Congress for.”
[…]
The Trump brothers’ deal with Powerus could give them sizable equity stakes. Their father, as commander in chief, launched the strikes with Israel against Iran over a month ago that began the war, the impetus for why these Gulf countries now need protection.
The Trump brothers are known experts in the field of drone warfare so it’s perfectly understandable that they would be involved with this company. I’m sure it has nothing to do with the fact that their father has started a war for no reason that will boost the value of this company tremendously.
We can take heart that at least it isn’t as corrupt as the Biden Crime Family’s reign of terror:
Unconfirmed reports are coming in that Iranians are forming human chains (human shields) around some of the power plants Donald “whole civilization will die tonight” Trump threatens to destroy beginning at 8 p.m. tonight. Already Tuesday, he’s launched over 90 strikes against Iran’s oil export hub at Kharg Island. Tehran’s calls for “young people to form human chains around power plants and other potential targets” have been supported by videos. One depicts
Iranians standing in a chain in front of the Kazeroon power plant, waving the Iranian flag. Fortune could not independently verify the videos. Independent news website DropSite News also reported that protestors were standing in front of Ahvaz and Dezful bridges and the Rajaee, Bisotun, and Tabriz power plants.
But no video or photos of the latter.
💢 THREAD: Iranians form human chains around power plants and bridges as Donald Trump warns “a whole civilization will die tonight”
As Trump issued his most explicit threat yet, videos circulating online show civilians gathering around power stations and key infrastructure… pic.twitter.com/xHnuDV8usw
Ali Ghamsari, a widely respected independent Iranian composer and musician known for blending traditional Persian music with contemporary expression, has consistently used his art and platform to stand with the people of Iran. He has shown up during natural disasters, supported… pic.twitter.com/gIH3istUbb
The New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof is still too polite in speaking about Trump’s “mental instability.” But he’s concerned enough to suggest top military brass consider how to respond to a madman’s order to deploy nukes(?). He suggests that cabinet members be prepared to invoke the 25th Amendment before Trump issues that directive. (They won’t, before or after, but it’s that bad.)
View on Threads
Trump is in madman territory. Even if he relishes playing reality TV host, hyping tonight’s episode, and keeping the entire world in suspense. Alternatively, writes David Frum, these are the kind of escalatory threats Trump issues even as he’s losing his nerve: “The more brutally Trump speaks, the more frantic he looks.” But then by definition, frantic madmen are not thinking clearly and can do incredibly stupid things.
Last night, U.S. forces launched one-way attack drones into Iran during Operation Epic Fury. CENTCOM made history a month ago when it began using low-cost aerial attack drones in combat for the first time.
Less noticed as Trump’s 8 p.m. ET “eve of destruction” deadline looms is the fact that he’s already destroyed the reputation of the United States of America.
This clip from a speech by U.S. Ambassador to UN Mike Waltz is Exhibit A. Observers begin shouting “WAR CRIMINAL” and “WHAT PEACE?” and (mockingly) “Is the Dow above 50,000?”
'WHAT PEACE?' — US Ambassador to UN Mike Waltz booed as he mentions 'Trump's peacemaking' pic.twitter.com/Qv8g5qhSXg
“Trump is threatening war crimes in Iran, and Vance is in Hungary campaigning with a wannabe dictator,” tweets Mike Nellis. “These people are insane. Remove them both.”
JD Vance doubles down on Trump’s new post threatening “a whole civilization will die tonight” and implies Trump might use nuclear weapons pic.twitter.com/GbxU602u6n
“We want a world,” Vance told a Viktor Orbán campaign rally, “where oil and gas is flowing freely, where people can afford to heat their homes and cool their homes, where they can afford to transport themselves to work.”
In essence, Trump and Vance want the world that existed before Trump attacked Iran on Feb. 28 and in response Iran shut down the Strait of Hormuz. Orbán’s authoritarian-friendly audience did not mock Vance like Waltz’s did. A pity.
National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan tells MS Now regarding Trump’s increasingly frequent use of the U.S. military, “His appetite grew with his eating.”
Absolute bombshell. Former National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan completely exposes Donald Trump. He confirms Trump ignored all intelligence professionals and Pentagon warnings, acting with total impunity. Now the entire world is paying the price for his disastrous war. pic.twitter.com/c88V06sINI
Likely a statement drafted in the Kremlin, JD Vance says almighty "Ukrainian intelligence" is rigging elections in both the US and Hungary. pic.twitter.com/XFK1fm6ppE
Vance on Tuesday said that “elements within the Ukrainian intelligence services” were trying “to put their thumb on the scale” of U.S. and Hungarian elections, without providing evidence. He also claimed the EU is interfering on behalf of the opposition. And yet he is the Vice President of the United States openly backing one candidate in a foreign election. Trump called in to the rally where JD was speaking to push for Orban’s campaign as well. It was as embarrassing as you might imagine.
Who’s putting their thumb on the scale?
The weirdest aspect of this is that Russia is now simultaneously allied with both the Iranian Ayatollah and the American tyrant, even as they fight each other. WTF???
Trump made it clear how much he is developing the roadmap hour-by-hour.
“To be a good president, I believe you have to have good instincts. And a lot of this is instinct,” he said. (So much for the the traditional national security process.)
His instincts are telling him to do this:
Just Security writes about the consequences to such rhetorical atrocities. You would think that this would be of concern to the Republican Party, the erstwhile loyal defenders of the military:
While our Commander-in-Chief threatens to “obliterate” “each and every one of their electric generating plants,” U.S. military commanders have been approving strike packages, wrestling with how to transform Trump’s dangerous bombast into lawful targets.
Asking our military professionals—lawyers and commanders alike—to grapple with the president’s erratic behavior is enormously consequential. U.S. military commanders have sworn to obey the Constitution and only those orders from their superiors that are lawful. Threats to bomb Iran “back to the Stone Ages” and to show “no quarter, no mercy” are plainly illegal. Trump’s outrageous statements gravely threaten our military professionals’ bedrock moral and legal principles, ones enshrined in the law of war that they’ve been trained to follow their entire careers.
We write to highlight that the Commander-in-Chief’s dangerous rhetoric places our service members in an intolerable position in several respects.
First, such threats undermine U.S. legitimacy and global standing, as they demonstrate a rejection of binding international agreements and core commitments to the laws of war. Indeed, the U.S. military doubled down on its commitment to the law of war following Vietnam War-era atrocities, requiring our Armed Forces to follow the law regardless how any conflict is characterized. An operation that followed through on Trump’s rhetoric would be one of infamy in the history of modern warfare.
Second, they pose a significant risk of moral and psychic injury for servicemembers. National soul-searching regarding how Americans fight followed the long U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, in which both civilian casualties and detainee abuse undermined strategic objectives and weighed heavily on soldiers’ consciences long after the fighting stopped. This reflection led to initiatives such as the Pentagon’s civilian harm mitigation program and new laws regarding detention and interrogation practices, strengthening U.S. commitment to fighting honorably and effectively through adherence to the law.
Finally, the public record of intent to commit war crimes puts soldiers at risk of later liability. In any future war crimes or U.C.M.J. investigation—for which there may be no statute of limitations—their actions will be judged based on the reasonably available information at the time of the strikes. See, e.g., Executive Summary of the Investigation of the Alleged Civilian Casualty Incident in the al Jadidah District, Mosul, May 8, 2017. Long after the Secretary of Defense receives his anticipated pardon from the president, it is not unlikely that both his and Trump’s expressly stated intent to commit acts that amount to clear war crimes and to dispense with “stupid rules of engagement” may be considered evidence of notice and scienter on the part of servicemembers’ during any future congressional or criminal investigations.
The U.S. military trains to fight with precision and lethality according to the law of war – precision meaning attacking only lawful military objectives while doing our utmost to protect innocent civilians caught up in the fight. The legal hurdle to convert a civilian object such as a power plant into a lawful military objective is a high one because the United States and its allies vigorously rejected “total war” after the massive suffering endured by millions during World War II. What President Trump threatens is exactly that, from a civilian targeting perspective – total war against Iran, a complete rejection of the legal limits the United States has incorporated into the law governing U.S. military operations for both pragmatic and moral reasons.
Trump does not care about civilians, no matter how much he brays about “peace.” He is a sadist. All you have to do is read that post to know that.
And, by the way:
By all accounts then, the law of war prohibits “acts or threats of violence the primary purpose of which is to spread terror among the civilian population.” It is difficult to read President Trump’s egregious threats of great destruction as anything but intending to spread terror, making it even more incumbent on U.S. military professionals to ensure strikes are limited in their impact on the Iranian people.To be sure, as stated above, individual components of Iranian civilian infrastructure may indeed constitute lawful military targets under specific circumstances in which they contribute to the enemy’s military action and their destruction would provide a definite military advantage.
That said, the damning public rhetoric surrounding these planned strikes against all power plants in an undifferentiated manner casts the legitimacy and legality of such an operation in serious doubt, to say the least. We urge military decisionmakers within the chain of command to think long-term, trust their training, and remember their oaths. American military professionals must remind their chain of command that the United States is not like Iran or Russia: our country is great because it adheres to the law of war and emerges victorious because of such adherence, not in spite of it. That might be said of all sorts of operations. Surely, here, the mass devastation on a civilian population makes where to draw the line excruciatingly clear.
Yeah, I don’t think the Trump administration is concerned with all that folderol:
REPORTER: ‘How would it not be a war crime to strike Iran’s bridges and power plants?’
TRUMP: ‘They’re animals.’
The arrogant hubris behind the US’ foreign policy is to dehumanise their enemies, as they always have done…
Behind the scenes: Trump might be the most hawkish person in the top echelons of his administration on Iran, according to a U.S. source who spoke to him several times in recent days.
“The president is the most bloodthirsty, like a mad dog,” another U.S. administration official said, downplaying stories that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth or Secretary of State Marco Rubio were egging him on. “Those guys sound like the doves compared to the president.”
Trump has started sounding out advisers and confidants about the plan to strike power plants and bridges by asking them, “What do you think of Infrastructure Day?”
Breaking it down: Trump’s negotiating team —Vice President JD Vance, Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner — thinks he should try to get a deal now if possible.
Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the leaders of Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and political allies like Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) are urging Trump not to agree to a ceasefire unless Iran makes concessions that currently appear unlikely, like reopening the Strait of Hormuz or relinquishing all highly enriched uranium.
