Skip to content

762 search results for ""voter fraud""

Guess who committed voter fraud?

You’ve got to love it:

President Donald Trump and those around him threw a multitude of voter-fraud conspiracy theories at the wall after the 2020 election. And few were as pervasive as the idea that people rose from the dead to help defeat Trump’s reelection bid.2021 Election: Complete coverage and analysis

Unlike many of the often-nebulous claims, these ones carried the benefit of often having been rather specific — citing actual dead people, by name, who supposedly voted. This made them actually verifiable.

Nearly a year later, those specific claims have provided a case study in — and a microcosm of — just how ridiculous this whole exercise was.

The specific dead people cited by Trump and his allies have, in most cases, proved to not actually have been cases of dead people’s identities used fraudulently to vote. And in several other cases, in which a dead person was actually recorded as voting, the culprit has been identified: not a systemic effort to inflate vote totals for President Biden, but rather a Republican.

On New Year’s Day, the conservative Daily Signal ran down some of the names that had been cited. The Trump campaign had named four people in Pennsylvania and four in Georgia, including in a series of news releases called “Victims of Voter Fraud.” The Nevada Republican Party cited another two in that state, calling one of them “concrete” evidence of irregularities. Fox News’s Tucker Carlson then laundered those names and another in a segment on dead people supposedly voting, saying, “What we’re about to tell you is accurate. It’s not a theory. It happened, and we can prove it.”

Of the 11 names cited in all of this, though, none has been shown to involve the identities of dead people used to vote for Biden. Most have been either debunked or pointed in the opposite direction.

We’ll recap the examples below, with the supposed dead person voting in bold.

The latest example involves a man in Nevada who said someone had voted in the name of his dead wife, Rosemarie Hartle. This was hailed widely on conservative media. It was the case the Nevada GOP said showed the “concrete” evidence of irregularities. We learned late last week that there might have been fraud involved, but the alleged fraud was perpetrated by a Republican with ties to the Trump campaign. The man, Donald Kirk Hartle, has been charged with voting in his dead wife’s name.

The situation was much that same with another name the Trump campaign cited in Pennsylvania, Elizabeth Bartman. Not long after it lifted that case up, Bartman’s son Bruce admitted he had registered and voted in his long-dead mother’s name to help Trump. He pleaded guilty.

Two others follow the pattern. Also in Pennsylvania, registered Republican Francis Fiore Presto was charged with requesting and casting a ballot for his dead wifeJudy Presto. Also in that state, the family of Denise Ondick said her ballot was filled out shortly before she died close to the election. A family member said their mother intended to vote for Trump.

Last week the Texas Lieutenant Governor finally paid out a reward to someone who found voter fraud. Much to his chagrin it was to someone who uncovered a Republican who voted twice. Of course.

It’s all projection.

You knew they’d say there was voter fraud didn’t you?

You knew they’d say there was voter fraud didn’t you?by digby

I know this will come as a big shock to everyone but the Alabama Secretary of State is very concerned:

Alabama Secretary of State John Merrill is investigating a concern over potential voter fraud in last Tuesday’s special Senate election.

It all stems from a brief interview FOX10 News Reporter Kati Weis conducted at the Doug Jones victory party on election night when a young man made a comment that has now gone viral on social media.

The interview took place just minutes after the race had been called.

While live on air, in the middle of the crowded party, Kati walked up to a number of jubilant supporters at random, asking them for their reactions to the big win.

But, it was this question and answer that has caused controversy:

“Kati: Why are you excited to see this victory? Man: Because, we came here all the way from different parts of the country as part of our fellowship, and all of us pitched in to vote and canvas together, and we got our boy elected!”

Merrill said he is trying to find out who the man is, and if he really meant what he said, or if he only misspoke.

“Well, it’s very disconcerting when someone who’s not from Alabama says that they participated in our election, so now it’s incumbent upon us to try to identify this young man, to see what kind of role he played, if it was to simply play a canvassing roll, or if he was part of a process that went out and tried to register voters, or if he himself actually became a registered voter,” said Merrill.

That’s right. This one remark is resulting in an investigation into voter fraud because idiots have made it go viral.

Meanwhile, Roy Moore is collecting money for a “recount” which I’m sure will be used for something much more useful to him personally.

It’s fundraiser time! If you’d like to put a little something in the Christmas stocking it would be most appreciated.

Happy Hollandaise everyone!

About that “voter fraud”

About that “voter fraud”

by digby

Trump, pimping civil unrest around the election:

Speaking in Altoona, Pa., Trump said it was “shocking” that Pennsylvania does not require photo identification to vote. The state’s voter ID law was struck down in 2014. 

“I hope you people can sort of not just vote on the 8th — go around and look and watch other polling places and make sure that it’s 100 percent fine,” Trump told his supporters. 

He argued that he has strong momentum in the state and that, “the only way we can lose, in my opinion, I really mean this, Pennsylvania, is if cheating goes on.” 

Trump said: “We’re going to watch Pennsylvania. Go down to certain areas and watch and study make sure other people don’t come in and vote five times.”

Except, you know:

I’ve been tracking allegations of fraud for years now, including the fraud ID laws are designed to stop. In 2008, when the Supreme Court weighed in on voter ID, I looked at every single allegation put before the Court. And since then, I’ve been following reports wherever they crop up. 

To be clear, I’m not just talking about prosecutions. I track any specific, credible allegation that someone may have pretended to be someone else at the polls, in any way that an ID law could fix. 

So far, I’ve found about 31 different incidents (some of which involve multiple ballots) since 2000, anywhere in the country. If you want to check my work, you can read a comprehensive list of the incidents below. 

To put this in perspective, the 31 incidents below come in the context of general, primary, special, and municipal elections from 2000 through 2014. In general and primary elections alone, more than 1 billion ballots were cast in that period. 

Some of these 31 incidents have been thoroughly investigated (including some prosecutions). But many have not. Based on how other claims have turned out, I’d bet that some of the 31 will end up debunked: a problem with matching people from one big computer list to another, or a data entry error, or confusion between two different people with the same name, or someone signing in on the wrong line of a pollbook.

I’ve been writing about this vote suppression tactic (which is all “voter fraud” is) for many years on this blog. But I’m afraid it’s going to take some kind of a serious turn this time with a whole bunch of people from different directions screaming about the election being “rigged” and “stolen.” It’s worrying.

.

Voter fraud for dummies

Voter fraud for dummies

by digby

Josh Marshall (correctly, in my opinion) surmises that Trump the narcissistic con man is setting the table for a claim that the election was stolen from him:

It may not seem terribly important right now with all the stories roiling the campaign. But I think there’s a good chance it’s the most important. Over the last 48 hours Trump’s allies, surrogates and now Trump himself have forcibly injected the topic of voter fraud or ‘election rigging’ into the election. Longtime TPM Readers know this topic has probably been the publication’s single greatest and most consistent focus over fifteen years. The subject has been investigated countless times. And it is clear that voter fraud and especially voter impersonation fraud is extremely rare – rare almost to the point of non-existence, though there have been a handful of isolated cases.

Vote fraud is clearly the aim in what is coming from Trump allies. But Trump’s own comment – “I’m afraid the election’s gonna be rigged, I have to be honest” – seems to suggest some broader effort to manufacture votes or falsify numbers, to allude to some broader conspiracy. Regardless, Trump is now pressing this issue to lay the groundwork to discredit and quite possibly resist the outcome of the November election.

Some might suggest that Trump’s prediction of a ‘rigged’ election is simply an extension of his complaints and vocabulary during the primary process. They’re wrong. Primaries have convoluted and complex rules. They’re not one person one vote elections. National elections have a clear cut set of rules. The only way to rig them is to change the vote numbers.

It’s true that Republicans have been very disingenuously pushing the ‘voter fraud’ con for years, especially as the power of minority voting has grown over the last two decades. However, as bad as that has been, there’s a major difference. Republicans to date have almost always used bogus claims of ‘voter fraud’ to rev up their troops and build support for restrictive voting laws, largely focused on minority voters. A number of those laws have been overturned by federal courts in the last week. A notable case was North Carolina where the Court found that the changes were intentionally designed to limit voting by black North Carolinians.

What Republicans politicians have virtually never done was use this canard to lay the groundwork for rejecting the result of a national election. This is Donald Trump, not a normal politician. You should not be surprised if he refuses to accept the result of an electoral defeat or calls on his supporters to resist it.

I have often wondered if this might happen. With concerns about rigged vote machines from the left and voter fraud from the right, we have lost trust in the electoral system. But the big problem is that we seem to be in a period of inane conspiracy theorizing and paranoia in the system at large, with anyone who disagrees being assumed to be corrupt or dishonest and the assumption being that the entire system is “rigged.” It’s not a partisan problem. It’s a logic problem and it’s getting worse with social media.

As Marshall points out in his piece, this could lead to something very dangerous in terms of Trump since many of his followers are already gun-toting extremists with a very thin grasp of democratic norms. It could be ugly.

.

He’ll find voter fraud even if he has to make it up

He’ll find voter fraud even if he has to make it up

by digby

This loon just won’t quit:

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach’s (R) office said Tuesday that he filed his first criminal voter fraud charges since being granted the authority to prosecute such cases earlier this year.

Kobach’s office on Friday filed complaints in Johnson County that accused Betty M. Gaedtke and Steven K. Gaedtke of “voting without being qualified,” a misdemeanor, during the 2010 election. A third complaint filed in Sherman County accused Lincoln L. Wilson of election perjury, a felony, as well as voting without being qualified in three elections between 2010 and 2014.

An attorney for the Gaedtkes did not immediately respond for a request for comment. Wilson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Kobach has been a lightning rod in the Sunflower State when it comes to voting rights. His critics say he greatly exaggerates the prevalence of voter fraud in the state and pushes new laws that restrict access to voting, particularly for people who tend to vote for Democrats.

Gov. Sam Brownback (R) in June signed legislation that granted Kobach the authority to pursue criminal charges in voter fraud cases even if local prosecutors opted against advancing those cases. Prior to that expansion of his authority, Kobach was compelled to refer voter fraud cases to local prosecutors.

I’ve written a lot about Kobach here on the blog and also over at Salon. He is a truly malign force in American life. Keep your eyes on this. He’s often in the vanguard.

.

Sharron Angle believes voter fraud robbed her of a Senate seat

Sharron Angle believes voter fraud robbed her of a Senate seat

by digby

Nevada Republicans are very concerned about voter fraud.  So they held yet another hearing to hash out the issue.  This story outlines what the writersterms the ensuing “fiesta of crazy” but I thought I’d just highlight just a little bit of his report:

Former Assemblywoman Sharron Angle, who has made a cottage industry out of implying her 2010 loss to Harry Reid in the U.S. Senate race was due to fraud, testified that between 3 percent and 9 percent of votes cast nationally were fraudulent, and that Nevada’s numbers were higher!

Evidence? Proof? Examples? Assemblyman Elliot Anderson wanted to know, risibly referring to Angle as an “expert” in the area.

“I do not have any examples that I know of,” Angle replied.

The same thing happened when Assemblyman Tyrone Thompson, D-North Las Vegas, asked Dickman for evidence. “Don’t you want to head off the fraud? I do,” Dickman replied, by way of non-answer. But despite the lack of readily available evidence, proponents of the bill stubbornly stuck to their belief that fraud is occurring. Assemblyman John Moore assumed facts not in evidence even more, asking a lobbyist for the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada if she was “OK” with people who are not U.S. citizens selecting elected representatives.

Assemblywoman Michele Fiore, R-Las Vegas, apparently didn’t like the fact that some committee members and witnesses claimed that minorities would be disproportionately harmed by a voter ID law. “We’re in 2015 and we have a black president, in case anyone didn’t notice,” she said. And there were apparently audible gasps in one of the hearing rooms after Fiore referred to colleague Harvey Munford, D-Las Vegas, who is black, as the first “colored man to graduate from his college.”

Fiore, you may recall was a big media presence in the Bundy stand-off.

No word on whether she had any barbequed “casualty” at the picnic later that day …

.

They’ll caterwaul about voter fraud but nobody will believe them

They’ll caterwaul about voter fraud but nobody will believe them

by digby

The more they try to stop them the more they will do it:

These bills and others Tillis and fellow Republicans forced through after they took control of both the legislature and the governorship in 2012 led the NAACP’s Rev. William Barber to launch the Moral Mondays movement in April 2013. For 74 straight weeks now, protesters have held demonstrations near the state capitol demanding a retreat from the state’s sharp right turn.

Now the NAACP is harnessing that anger to get voters to the polls in the most massive mobilization effort the group has ever made in a non-presidential year. Last Thursday, the first day of early voting in the state, the NAACP led 32 marches to the polls—more than in any previous midterm year. Barber’s organization is also calling all of the 286,000 African-Americans who voted in 2012 and 2008 but didn’t vote in 2010, helping register thousands of new voters, buying radio ads, and reaching out to churches. “African-Americans need to vote because we’re the ones who know the most about voter suppression,” Barber told Mother Jones.

Indeed they do. And this too:

If Hagan loses, though, it won’t be African-Americans’ fault. It will be because too many centrist Democrats voted Republican, Barber says. There are 800,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans in North Carolina, many of whom are white. “You don’t lay the blame of this election on black people.”

He’s right. And he’s right to bring it up ahead of time.

But any Democrat who votes for that wingnut Tillis needs to change his or her registration.

.

Guns and voter fraud vigilantes by @BloggersRUs

Guns and voter fraud vigilantes

by Tom Sullivan

As early voting gets started here this week, more thoughts about new voting restrictions.

Call a gun rights advocate’s AR-15 an assault rifle and he’ll think you’re a dumbass liberal who a) doesn’t know the first thing about weapons, and b) has no business anywhere near laws affecting his right to bear arms. What should voting rights advocates think of voter fraud vigilantes who call any and every form of election irregularity voter fraud?

Imposing new gun laws is counterproductive, many Republicans believe, because most criminals get guns illegally. More regulation just infringes upon honest Americans’ rights. But more regulations passed to prevent voting illegally? A nonissue.

The University of Texas-Austin’s Daily Texan weighed in on that last week:

The fact that over half a million Texans do not have the proper form of ID in order to comply with the law and will thus be disenfranchised this November is apparently a nonissue. That these Texans belong to groups that historically vote Democratic is also a coincidence.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker this month:

“I was at a town hall meeting yesterday in Appleton, and took questions from the crowd, and one person asked me how many cases of fraud there have been in the state. I said, does not matter if it was one or a hundred or a thousand. I ask amongst us, who would be that one person who would want to have our vote canceled out by a vote cast illegally?”

How many married couples who “cancel out” each others’ votes each election advocate laws preventing spouses from “stealing” their votes? Who amongst the tens of millions of real Americans without photo IDs would want to be kept from voting because of vigilantes’ “downright goofy, if not paranoid” fears about what they insist might be a “widespread problem“?

Mark Fiore takes on the Voter Fraud Vigilantes here.

I smell voter fraud at the very least

I smell voter fraud at the very least

by digby

IOKIYAR:

Larry Pressler, who is running for Senate in South Dakota as an independent, has his principal residence in Washington, according to District of Columbia tax records.

Pressler, who served as a Republican in Congress from 1975 to 1997, and his wife receive the homestead deduction, a generous tax break meant for people who use their D.C. home as their “principal residence,” according to the D.C. Office of Tax and Revenue. The tax break reduces a property’s “assessed value by $70,200 prior to computing the yearly tax liability,” the District says.

The Presslers’ apartment is a 2,200-square-foot, two-bedroom, 2½ bathroom condo in Foggy Bottom, close to The George Washington University and the State Department. Property records show Pressler paid $690,000 for the apartment in 2003.

Reached on his cellphone — with a D.C. area code — Pressler said Thursday evening the apartment is indeed his, and he remained in Washington after losing his Senate seat because his wife works in D.C. He noted that they are “longtime voters in South Dakota.”

The South Dakota Senate race has suddenly turned competitive. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee said Wednesday it would put $1 million into television ads in the state, and an outside group told POLITICO Friday it is spending $400,000 to attack Pressler. Former Republican Gov. Mike Rounds was the early favorite in the contest. He faces Democrat Rick Weiland and Pressler. A recent SurveyUSA poll showed 35 percent of voters favoring Rounds, 32 percent supporting Pressler and 28 supporting Weiland.

Homestead deductions have been a political issue in the past. Members of Congress have caught heat for taking a tax break for their residence in D.C.

When he goes to South Dakota, Pressler said he has stayed in Humboldt, where he owns an “interest” in his family farm. On Pressler’s financial disclosure form, he says that he has interest in two farms in South Dakota: one in Gregory, worth between $50,000 and $100,000 and one in Humboldt worth between $15,000 and $50,000.

He said he is not “a rich man and cannot afford to buy more than one house.” His financial disclosure says that he and his wife are worth at least $847,000 and have no debt.

But Pressler has also been an owner of two apartments in Manhattan. He currently owns on East 57th Street between Park Avenue and Lexington Avenue. He bought that unit in 2008 for $655,000, and took out a $200,000 mortgage, according to New York City property records. He previously owned an apartment in the Trump Parc on Central Park South, the swank street that runs the length of the south end of the legendary park. He bought that in 2006 for $360,000, and sold it for $435,000 in 2007. He didn’t respond to an email seeking comment about the New York apartment.

Here’s what he’s done since he left the Senate — none of it took place in South Dakota:

After his defeat, Pressler passed the New York bar and worked again as a lawyer. Pressler subsequently became senior partner of the law firm O’Connor and Hannan, where he served for six years, and then formed his own law firm, The Pressler Group. Pressler is a member of the New York Bar, the Washington DC Bar, and the Supreme Court Bar.

He has also lectured at more than twenty universities in China, India and the U.S., and has been granted two lifetime Fulbright teaching awards.[12]

Pressler has remained active in the political arena. In 2000, he was a member of Republican Presidential Candidate George W. Bush’s Information Technology Steering Committee, and also served on the Bush Presidential Transition Team in 2001.[13]

Pressler attempted a political comeback in 2002 by running for South Dakota’s open at-large House seat but he essentially discontinued his campaign when Republican Governor Bill Janklow unexpectedly entered the race.

Pressler was appointed an official observer of Ukraine’s national election in December 2004.[14]

Pressler endorsed Barack Obama for President in 2008 and 2012.[15]

On November 10, 2009, President Obama named Pressler to the U.S. Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad.[16] He also serves on the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission.[17]

In October 2012, based on veterans’ issues, Pressler endorsed Obama for a second term with an article in the Huffington Post and on national television networks.[18] Pressler campaigned in a bipartisan team for Obama in the fall of 2012, speaking on behalf of the Obama ticket to certain veteran’s groups in Virginia.[19]

He taught as a Distinguished Visiting Professor at Sciences Po University, Paris, France, and Reims, France, in the Fall of 2012.[20] He chiefly teaches international relations to graduate students.

I guess people don’t care about this. Hillary famously moved to New York after leaving the White House in order to run for the Senate and Scott Brown is running in New Hampshire as a newly minted resident.

But I question whether or not Pressler and his wife are entitled to vote in South Dakota.She clearly lives in DC, he admits it. And he hasn’t done anything in decades that could be construed as South Dakota based. Republicans are making a fetish out of the smallest details of voting laws to ensure that every last person dots every last “i” or face the consequences, no exceptions, not even for elderly people who’ve been voting since Roosevelt’s time.

Here is the South Dakota voting law:

Definition of Residency for Voter Registration (SDCL 12-1-4)

For the purposes of this title, the term, residence, means the place in which a person has fixed his or her habitation and to which the person, whenever absent, intends to return.

A person who has left home and gone into another state or territory or county of this state for a temporary purpose only has not changed his or her residence.

A person is considered to have gained a residence in any county or municipality of this state in which the person actually lives, if the person has no present intention of leaving.

If a person moves to another state, or to any of the other territories, with the intention of making it his or her permanent home, the person thereby loses residence in this state.

I guess “intention” is a vague term. But if you are taking a tax deduction for you permanent residence someplace, it seems to me your intention is pretty lear. Especially since you’ve been living there since the 1970s and run your business from there:

In a followup email, Pressler told POLITICO that he “made a decision after my loss in 1996 to support my wife and her business by helping her keep a residence where she built her business. My wife has supported me by traveling home to South Dakota to support me with my work as well.”

“My wife has been the primary co-owner of our Washington, DC residence for decades,” he wrote. “Her principal residence and career work has been in the city for more than three decades, which qualifies her for the Homestead Tax Exemption. Furthermore, she has always paid her Washington, DC Income Taxes all these years which is also a qualifying factor for the Homestead Tax Exemption.”

I guess he was commuting from Sioux Falls to Manhattan and the Sorbonne.

And truthfully, you might be able to call Pressler himself itinerant enough to qualify as a resident simply because he works in a lot of places.  ( Of course he should have registered as a DC or New York voter after 1996. )But the wife has been in DC all these years and long after Pressler left politics. Sounds like voter fraud to me. And we can’t have that.

.

Voter fraud doesn’t usually happen. But when it does, it’s usually by Republicans. by @DavidOAtkins

Voter fraud doesn’t usually happen. But when it does, it’s usually by Republicans.

by David Atkins

Voter fraud: it almost never happens. When it does, it usually gets caught. And it’s usually by Republicans like this guy:

A Shorewood man has been charged with more than a dozen counts of illegal voting, accused of casting multiple ballots in four elections in 2011 and 2012, including five in the 2012 gubernatorial recall.

Robert D. Monroe, 50, used addresses in Shorewood, Milwaukee and Indiana, according to the complaint, and cast some votes in the names of his son and his girlfriend’s son.

According to the complaint:

Monroe cast two ballots in the April 2011 Supreme Court election, two in the August 2011 Alberta Darling recall election, five in the Scott Walker-Tom Barrett recall, one illegal ballot in an August 2012 primary, and two ballots in the November 2012 presidential election.

In the presidential election, Monroe cast an in-person absentee ballot in Shorewood on Nov. 1 and drove a rental car to Lebanon, Ind., where he showed his Indiana driver’s license to vote in person on election day, Nov. 6, the complaint charges. Monroe owns a house there, according to the complaint.

The 26-page criminal complaint was filed Friday in Milwaukee County Circuit Court and is being prosecuted by Assistant District Attorney Bruce Landgraf, one of the prosecutors involved in the John Doe investigations of Gov. Scott Walker’s staff when he was county executive and the now-halted probe into fundraising by Walker’s gubernatorial campaign.

The complaint indicates the investigation started in Waukesha County as an inquiry into possible double voting by Monroe’s son, who lives in Waukesha. But the son denied any knowledge of requesting an absentee ballot from his father’s Shorewood address, and the investigation shifted back to Milwaukee County.

Steven Benen has more examples of Republican vote fraudsters:

Remember the Nevada voter who cast multiple ballots in the same election because she wanted to test the integrity of the elections system? She was a Republican voter.

Remember the Texas voter who cast absentee ballots on behalf of his girlfriend for the five years after she died? He was a Republican voter, too.

Remember the Indiana secretary of state convinced to voter fraud? Yep, a Republican.

I don’t doubt that there are examples from the other side of the aisle, but they just haven’t left the kind of impression these amazing cases have.

There are a few cases of Dem-leaning voters out there, but a scramble of news stories tends to turn up more on the GOP side.

Again, this isn’t a big problem–and that’s really the whole point. It’s really rare. It’s almost always caught. But there’s little question which side has less compunction about cheating.

.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try refining your search: