Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

Alina Habba FTL

She’s a terrible lawyer and a terrible actress

And she’s just as nuts as he is:

Following a massive verdict where a New York federal jury ordered Donald Trump to pay over $83 million in damages to E. Jean Carroll for making defamatory statements about her, Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, exited the courtroom, on the brink of tears, and lambasted the court and the process for holding Donald Trump accountable. Watch the moment below:

Following her meltdown, CNN’s Jake Tapper put her speech into perspective by talking about her “effectiveness” as Trump’s attorney. Watch for yourself:

This is the woman who said she’d rather be pretty than smart because she can fake being smart. Actually, she can’t. She proved that with her embarrassing performance in federal court. She’s better hope that Trump keeps her on for the rest of his life and actually pays his bills because no one else in their right mind would hire this ridiculous person.

Even The Wall Street Journal…

The Wall St. Journal breaks from the MAGA GOP which may have some effect on donors and, therefore, Republican politicians:

The Wall Street Journal‘s editorial board is warning Republicans that they may pay a political price for letting Donald Trump rip up a deal to beef up border security measures and provide more aid to Ukraine.

On Wednesday, Punchbowl News reported that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) had told his colleagues that they were in a “quandary” because Trump opposes the deal and the caucus doesn’t want to do anything to “undermine” the likely Republican presidential nominee.

The Journal submitted that following Trump’s command “would be a self-inflicted wound.”

“President Biden would claim, with cause, that Republicans want border chaos as an election issue rather than solving the problem,” argued its editors. “Voter anger may over time move from Mr. Biden to the GOP, and the public will have a point. Cynical is the only word that fits Republicans panning a border deal whose details aren’t even known.”

They’re worried that they’re going to lose their tax cuts which is apparently even more important than the excellent economy they are experiencing under Biden. Priorities.

This crack in the coalition with money on one side and racist fear-mongers on the other is always there but this time it may just break wide open, at least on this issue. GOP pols are caught in the middle. We’ll have to see which side they believe their bread is buttered on.

What A Mess

Who’s a civilian?

Collapsed building in Gaza Strip. Photo October 9, 2023 by Trong Khiem Nguyen via Flickr (public domain).

The Atlantic:

The International Court of Justice in The Hague today made an initial ruling, four weeks after an application from South Africa that accused Israel of committing genocide against Palestinians. The court ordered Israel to ensure that its military does not commit acts of genocide against Palestinians, to immediately improve humanitarian aid to Palestinians, and to prevent and punish genocidal incitement against Palestinians.

However, the court stopped short of ordering Israel to end its military operations against Hamas, a nod to Israel’s right to respond in self-defense after the deadly Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7. South Africa had hoped the court would order such a cessation, in effect ruling in favor of an immediate cease-fire in Gaza. The court did also call for the immediate release of Israeli hostages held by Hamas.

Given the dreadful toll of civilian deaths in Gaza, reportedly now topping 25,000, Israel should answer questions about its conduct. Every member of the United Nations’ 1948 Genocide Convention has an obligation to raise concerns if they have evidence that a group of people is at risk of genocide. Given previous catastrophic failures to prevent genocide—in Bosnia, Rwanda, Darfur—more referrals to the court could be good news for the protection of civilians at risk. And unlike Russia, against which Ukraine made a complaint to the court in February 2022, Israel has indicated that it takes the charges seriously, attending the court to dispute the accusation.

“Dreadful toll” is certainly apt. It may be an “angels dancing on the head of a pin” matter, but “civilian deaths” is difficult to quantify when the Gaza health ministry does not distinguish between combatant “civilians” and civilian civilians. People are dying of wounds and on the edge of starving as Israeli bombs keep falling and Israeli tanks keep lobbing shells.

“Please, Israel, do not commit genocide while you are conducting your self-defense operations in a dense strip of land from which civilians are not allowed to flee” is pretty thin gruel.

Meantime, Israel charges that United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) members in the region particpated in the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks in southern Israel that sparked Israeli retaliation (CBS News):

The United States government said Friday that it was temporarily pausing additional funding for UNRWA, the United Nations humanitarian agency that serves Palestinians, as the organization said it had opened an investigation into allegations from Israel that some of its staff members participated in Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks.

Those attacks about 1,200. Canada, U.K., and Australia have also paused funding. UNRWA said it had fired the employees who were accused.

“The Israeli authorities have provided UNRWA with information about the alleged involvement of several UNRWA employees in the horrific attacks on Israel on October 7,” Philippe Lazzarini, UNRWA Commissioner-General, said in a statement Friday, according to the Reuters news agency. “To protect the agency’s ability to deliver humanitarian assistance, I have taken the decision to immediately terminate the contracts of these staff members and launch an investigation in order to establish the truth without delay.”

Lazzarini did not say how many UNRWA employees were accused of participating in the attack, but said “any UNRWA employee who was involved in acts of terror” would be held accountable, and possibly face criminal prosecution. 30,000 people work for UNWRA, according to its website. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said 12 UNRWA employees had been accused of participating in the Oct. 7 attack.

What “particpating” means is left undefined in that report.

BBC offers this detail:

On Friday, an adviser to the Israeli prime minister told the BBC that the 7 October Hamas attacks had involved “people who are on their [UNRWA] salaries”.

Mark Regev said there was information showing teachers working in UNRWA schools had “openly celebrated” the 7 October attacks.

He also referred to an Israeli hostage who, on her release, said she had been “held in the house of someone who worked for UNRWA”.

Josh Holland (We’ve Got Issues podcast) expresses skepticism at Mastodon:

Unless there’s more to it than this story lays out, the allegations made by a far-right gov that sees humanitarian orgs as mortal enemies and is notoriously loose with the facts seem exceptionally thin. A teacher in an UNRA school “celebrated” 10/7 and Hamas kept hostages in an UNRA employee’s apt?

Investigating the claim is one thing, but pausing funding when 2 million people are suffering the worst humanitarian crisis in memory is horrific.

What a mess.

Another Day Older And $83.3 Million In Debt

What do Democrats offer instead?

Donald “91 Counts” Trump will appeal the judgment, of course. It’s what he does as surely as “grab them.” He’ll appeal the $83.3 million judgment a Manhattan jury on Friday awarded E. Jean Carroll in her defamation case (The Guardian):

Carroll will receive $18.3m in compensatory damages and $65m in punitive retribution. The former president is paying Carroll compensatory damages of $18.3m – $11m to fund a reputational repair campaign. The $7.3m is for the emotional harm caused by Trump’s 2019 public statements. Carroll and her legal team were beaming as they left court in a black SUV. They did not answer questions immediately after court let out.

Moments after the decision was announced, Trump decried it as “absolutely ridiculous” on Truth Social, and said he would be filing an appeal.

Naturally.

Carroll’s attorney, Roberta Kaplan, told CNN’s Anderson Cooper she’d never seen someone as contemptuous of the U.S. justice system as Trump. (Unless he can turn it againt his enemies, also naturally.)

Trump is not enough

Democrats will use this case and Trump’s other legal troubles against him in this year’s elections. And against his fellow Republicans (Politico):

So far, Democrats have launched Trump-themed attacks on a handful of vulnerable Republicans across the country, using billboards in battleground districts.

In New York, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee plans to highlight Trump’s role in restricting abortion through his Supreme Court appointees who voted to overturn Roe v. Wade. They are also pointing out a 2017 law that limited state and local tax deductions to $10,000 — a provision known as SALT that hurt homeowners in high-tax states like New York and that suburban GOP lawmakers have pushed to change.

Taken together, they are aiming to build a case against anyone who shares a party ID with the controversial former president and native New Yorker as the Democrats fend off attacks on their own record on migrants and crime.

[…]

Democrats also want to make Rep. Elise Stefanik, the House GOP conference chair and a lightning rod for liberals, a liability for Republicans this year. Stefanik is a prominent Trump supporter and has been floated as a potential running mate.

It’s what Republicans have done with Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for years: tie any and every Democratic candidate to the “San Francisco liberal” no matter how ridiculous the association. Despite the fact that it frequently doesn’t work. They believe it gins up the GOP base, and maybe it does.

Tying GOP candidates to Trump might do that with Democratic voters. But what Democrats need if they expect to win is to give “low-propensity” unaffiliated voters a reason to turn out for Democratic candidates in the fall. “We’re not Tump” is not enough. “There has to be a dream. We have to be for a thing,” messaging expert Anat Shenker-Osorio tells students. Rev. Martin Luther King is not famous for saying, “I have a complaint.”

“Chaos follows him,” former South Carolina Gov. Nikki says of Trump as though his hands are clean of sending his MAGA mob to sack the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Voters not in the Trump cult have had enough Trump chaos. They will vote against that, as they did in New Hampshire this week.

But Democrats have to offer a positive alternative and sell it hard if they expect to generate enough youth turnout to do more than sqeak by. Running hard on women’s rights is already a proven vote-getter. Winning 55 percent of the national vote is not out of the question, says Simon Rosenberg, and “may be the only way we’re going to get the Republicans to abandon MAGA and become a more traditional center-right party.”

Not that I won’t settle for squeaking by. But a decisive win for Biden in November will help put MAGA back in the box and help avoid another Jan. 6. So paint the beautiful tomorrow, Democrats. Sell the brownie, not the recipe. Let the Lincoln Project do what it does better than you anyway.

Friday Night Soother

Some beautiful creatures:

Another Comer Misfire

He just can’t do anything right

James Comer is an idiot:

The House Oversight Committee on Tuesday released the transcript of the testimony of Kevin Morris, a friend of and attorney for Hunter Biden, and his statements undercut everything Republicans have said about the embattled first son.

Morris is a high-powered entertainment lawyer in Los Angeles who met Hunter at a 2019 presidential fundraiser for his father, Joe Biden. Morris has loaned Hunter nearly $5 million in the years since. He testified about his relationship with Hunter in a closed-door committee hearing last week.

Initially, Oversight Chair James Comer just released a list of paraphrased highlights from Morris’s testimony. Comer claimed that Morris informally loaned Hunter the money and does not expect to be repaid until after the 2024 election—or possibly ever. But the transcript shows this couldn’t be further from the truth.

In reality, Morris never once mentioned the possibility of forgiving the loans. Instead, he said he has a “100 percent” expectation that Hunter will repay him, and repeatedly states that he and Hunter have a series of promissory notes agreeing the younger Biden will pay back the money.

[…]

The only person who mentions loan forgiveness in the entire interview is Representative Andy Biggs. The Arizona Republican has been a vocal critic of the Biden family, accusing them of criminal wrongdoing. Biggs asked what consequences Hunter would face if he defaulted on these loans.

Morris joked that, hypothetically, a lender could ask the borrower to “come over and wash your car for the rest of their life.”

Biggs replied, “Or you can forgive. You can forgive it.”

Morris agreed that was an option, but he never said he would.

Morris also repeatedly stated that Hunter never asked him for the money. Morris would voluntarily send money through his lawyers to Hunter’s, but the younger Biden did not ask him to do so. Morris only gave Hunter cash directly once, when he bought two paintings on their second meeting in 2019. And again, he wants the rest of the money he loaned paid back with interest.

Look, we all know it’s skeevy that the children of powerful people get special opportunities to make money by trading on their famous family’s name. This has been going on since time began. I’m against it. But all this “investigation” of poor Hunter Biden, a man who has had some mammoth personal struggles, has turned up absolutely no evidence of any kind of corruption. I still maintain that this is mostly in order to make Joe Biden cry but it’s not working. And Hunter seems to be a lot smarter and tougher than they gave him credit for.

What a clown show this is.

Trump’s Social Media Bubble

It tells you a lot about the cult and why they love him

Philip Bump reads Trump’s social media so you don’t have to. And his analysis of what it tells us is right on:

Truth Social is a weird place.

The social media site started by Donald Trump (or, really, by tech-savvy people working for him) is not formally oriented around Trump, but it is in practice. It is largely populated by Trump fans and allies who use the site to orbit Trump like asteroids circling the sun. Trump uses it differently, injecting rhetoric and framing into the national conversation.

Nearly every one of his posts triggers the same response from the site’s users: a flurry of pro-Trump, anti-Biden memes tacked on to Trump’s missive. It’s feudalistic; when the king emerges from the castle, the serfs compete to offer him their wares in the hopes that — glory be! — he might lackadaisically bless them with a reshare.

All of that, the context for the site, offers insight into how Trump approaches power. But one post in particular, offered up by Trump on Wednesday evening, was even more revealing.

What grabbed the most attention was Trump’s announcement that he was excommunicating donors to former U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley’s campaign from his political circle.

“Anybody that makes a ‘Contribution’ to [Haley], from this moment forth, will be permanently barred from the MAGA camp,” he wrote with his idiosyncratic punctuation and capitalization. “We don’t want them, and will not accept them, because we Put America First, and ALWAYS WILL!”

It wasn’t hard to see this coming. Trump wants to be done with the primaries and understands that Haley, his only remaining opponent, needs financial contributions to press on. So he imposes what costs he can on doing so, a “permanent bar” from “MAGA camp.”

Such promises are often illusory in Trumpworld; Haley herself went from criticizing him forcefully in 2016 to being tapped to serve as his ambassador to the United Nations. It’s also an easy threat to issue when you’re running out the clock in a primary season. When the general election campaign begins and Trump is trying to raise nine figures to defeat President Biden, the apostasy of giving cash to Haley will be easy to forgive.

But step back a bit. This is Trump attempting to impose a penalty on those who defy him, to make democratic expression something for which one can be punished. He could simply wait for Haley’s inevitable concession. Instead, he’s lashing out at the insolence of not falling in line.

If you think he wouldn’t be happy to scale this up, you haven’t been paying attention.

Again, though, that was just part of the social media post.

Haley, he declared at the outset, “is very bad for the Republican Party and, indeed, our Country.”

Why?

Because, the former president wrote, “Her False Statements, Derogatory Comments, and Humiliating Public Loss, is demeaning to True American Patriots.”

If there is one thing Donald Trump will not abide, it is false statements, disparaging people or refusing to accept a humiliating public loss. When one thinks of the things that are least Trump-like, it’s dishonesty, rudeness and a failure to concede elections.

One would be forgiven for marveling at the lack of self-awareness in that phrase or to assume that he is being intentionally ironic. We might also wonder if this is another example of Trump trying to redirect criticism he faced against someone else, either to dilute the criticism or to “what about” it. Either way, it stands out.

In his post, Trump went on to suggest that Haley should be angry not at him but at her consultants. (Unlikely, given that Haley has outperformed every other challenger to the quasi-incumbent Trump.) And then one more insult.

“I knew Nikki well, she was average at best, is not the one to take on World Leaders, and she never did,” Trump wrote. “That was up to me, and that is why they respected the United States.”

We’ve been through this before, too. Someone who worked for Trump and received praise when hired or appointed is transformed, once they defy him, into a bumbling buffoon who relied on Trump to backstop their ineptitude.

Haley was picked to represent the country at the United Nations in November 2016. At the time, Trump’s team put out a statement praising the South Carolina governor.

“Governor Haley has a proven track record of bringing people together regardless of background or party affiliation to move critical policies forward for the betterment of her state and our country,” it read. “She will be a great leader representing us on the world stage.”

“You’ve been fantastic,” Trump said when she eventually resigned the post. “You’re my friend. And I just — on behalf of the country, I want to thank you for a great job.”

As hollow a sentiment as his more recent one.

But this is Trump in a nutshell. No permanent friends, only permanent interests: specifically, accruing power for Donald Trump. It’s all familiar — the disparaging of former allies, the threats, the complaints about things he does.

This, not any policy, constitutes Donald Trump’s politics.

That is exactly right. And his appeal has nothing to do with policy either. I don’t think most of his followers could name one except maybe “the wall” which he failed to build. That’s not why they love him. They love him because they love a man who dominates. And just like him, they are infuriated that half the country is refusing to be dominated.

Trump cultists know on some level that they are patsies which is one reason they are so mad at the rest of us. We make them look bad.

Donald The Drama Queen

Do people really want someone who acts like this in a federal court room to be the president of the United States?

I guess he’s the best the Republican party can do…

Roughly 20 minutes after walking into the courtroom, Donald Trump stormed out of closing arguments in a civil trial to determine how much money he owes E Jean Carroll for repeatedly defaming her.

The former president arrived in federal court in Manhattan on Friday morning after briefly testifying in his defence on Thursday afternoon, after which he unleashed more attacks and potentially defamatory statements about the former Elle magazine columnist.

In her closing statement, Ms Carroll’s attorney Roberta Kaplan told jurors that the former president “acts as if these rules of law just don’t apply to him.”

His attacks didn’t stop after he was found liable for defamation and sexual abuse in a $5m jury verdict, she noted.

“Not at all,” Ms Kaplan said. “Not even for 24 hours.”

Mr Trump then stood up from the defence table, where he was seated next to attorney Alina Habba, and walked out of the hearing, to which he had arrived late.

“The record will reflect that Mr Trump just rose and walked out of the courtroom,” US District Judge Lewis Kaplan said.

Mr Trump returned to the courtroom for defence closing arguments from Ms Habba.

As he returned to the courtroom, his Truth Social account fired off several posts repeating incendiary and potentially defamatory claims about the case, claiming he is a victim of “extortion” and falsely labelling the case a “Joe Biden-directed Election Interference Attack” against him.

This is outrageous behavior for anyone. Coming from a presidential candidate is just insane. Or, at least, it would be insane if the GOP base wasn’t a cult.

I seriously doubt this will endear him to the jury. But maybe he’s counting on the appeals dragging out as long as possible, perhaps in the hopes that Carroll dies before he has to pay out any money? I don’t know. I’m sure he believes this helps him with his ecstatic followers but I’m not sure they’re even hearing about this. They don’t cover his trials very closely in right wing media.

But normal people are hearing about this. And this petulant, childish behavior may not play as well with those GOP-leaning independents and suburban moms.

Big Pharma Goes MAGA

I guess I don’t expect anything better of these people but it makes me ill anyway:

Big Pharma has invested big money in the organizations planning what a MAGA policy agenda will look like in a new Trump administration. Not surprisingly, that policy playbook contains a major gift for the drug industry: a swift end to the Biden administration’s landmark program to allow Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices.

For two decades, Congress barred Medicare from negotiating prescription drug prices, which is a major reason why Americans pay higher prices for drugs than anyone else in the world. In 2022, Democrats finally passed legislation creating a price negotiation pilot program. 

The same year, Washington’s top drug lobby — Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA — donated $530,000 to groups involved with the far-right Project 2025 agenda. The agenda, which is meant to serve as a policy roadmap for the early days of a new Donald Trump presidency, includes a call to repeal the new provisions allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices.

The provisions are one of the most popular achievements of the Joe Biden presidency, with 76 percent of Americans supporting Medicare drug-price negotiations, including two thirds of Republicans. Only 6 percent of Americans outright oppose the policy, according to recent polling by the Associated Press.

So it’s not surprising that Big Pharma would fund front groups willing to wage an unpopular battle to boost drug manufacturers’ bottom lines — PhRMA has long done so with organizations on both sides of the aisle. However, the lobbying group’s donations to the organizations behind Project 2025 implicates the pharmaceutical industry in an extremist conservative plan that calls for eliminating access to the abortion pill, allowing states to ban hospitals from providing emergency abortion care, and ending protections for LGBTQ+ Americans.

The greed is so overwhelming that they would rather help people who want to end abortion and birth control — products they sell — rather than succumb to the kind of price controls every other country in the world already has in place.

Maybe they think they can get in on the big new business in executions that Donald trump is planning. I’m sure it will be lucrative.

Trump Owns The GOP Establishment

It’s no longer about Washington. His top enforcers are the red state governors

Donald Trump is having a rolling hissy fit that’s escalating by the day. From court rooms to rallies to incoherent interviews, his behavior is making it clear the pressure is getting to him and he’s coming unglued. Ever since he realized that Nikki Haley is not going to be a good little girl and quit the race on his time table he’s been beside himself.

Trump was so angry on Wednesday that he fired off a post on his Truth Social platform threatening to blackball any Haley donor who continues to give “Birdbrain” any money, declaring “from this moment forth, will be permanently barred from the MAGA camp.” (Haley responded with a fundraising pitch and reportedly took in over a million dollars.) I doubt very seriously that Trump will be turning away money from anyone — he’s never left a penny on the sidewalk. But it was a gangster move in keeping with his ritual humiliation of Senator Tim Scott on the stage at his victory speech in New Hampshire, intended to send a message that he’s their daddy and nobody should forget it. He’s not being subtle.

In another attempt to run Haley out of the race as quickly as possible, on Thursday a draft memo from Trump henchman David Bossie, the former president’s eyes and ears in the Republican National Committee, was circulated proposing that the RNC officially declare Trump the “presumptive nominee.” That idea was quickly quashed and despite the fact that he was probably behind it, Trump issued a Truth Social statement saying that he preferred they not do it for the sake of “party unity.” But he did express his gratitude for the “respect” the Committee showed him. He sounds more like a mob boss every day.

Trump knows that Haley isn’t going to win the nomination unless something catastrophic happens to change things so it’s reasonable to ask why he is so agitated and desperate to get her out of the race. Why not just ignore her and carry on with his usual blather about shower heads and windmills and tales of his former glory? I think he’s very, very unnerved by the fact that Haley penetrates the right wing bubble and what she’s saying about him — that he’s a loser and he’s losing it — which are the worst charges he can imagine being leveled at him. (In his mind it’s far worse than being found liable for rape or espionage or sedition.) She’s appearing before Republican voters and some of them may not have heard this before so he really needs for her to shut up and go home. So far, she doesn’t seem inclined to do that so the feud will escalate until she does. He’s not going to let it go. An uppity woman refusing to bend the knee when he tells her to is something he simply cannot abide.

He’s flexing his muscles in Washington with much better results. It was only a matter of time before he openly asserted himself into the arduous negotiations over the funding bill for Ukraine and the border and needless to say he did so in the most destructive and self-serving manner possible. Mitch McConnell reportedly told his caucus this week that “the politics have changed” and Trump doesn’t want any legislative action on the border in order to keep it as an election issue for him and it wouldn’t be prudent to “undermine” him. Some Senators said they didn’t hear it exactly that way but it’s pretty clear that’s exactly what happened.

Trump himself confirmed his wishes on Truth Social last night:

Nobody knows what he means by the country having to “close up” for a while if there is no agreement but you can bet that whatever it is, it will be catastrophic. It’s clear that he wants the congress to refuse to do any deal until he can win and create the “PERFECT” border.

There are reports that this negotiation is not actually dead and there are some Republicans besides Romney on the record saying that they are still in favor of passing something since Biden has made such big concessions that they don’t think they’ll ever get another chance. This news did not seem to persuade the hardcore Trumpers in the US Congress who don’t care about the reality of the border as much as they care about having the issue of the border to express their solidarity with Donald Trump and their racist base. Any real reforms would be counter-productive.

And since they are totally shameless, the utter hypocrisy of standing before the American people and bellowing about the crisis on the border in the same breath that they say they don’t want to give Biden a “win” so they’ll refuse to take action for the next year is not an impediment.

There is a new dynamic in MAGA world that may shake things up in ways we can’t anticipate. This border crisis is no longer just a matter of Washington dysfunction. 25 Republican governors have come together in solidarity behind Governor Greg Abbott of Texas in his defiance of a Supreme Court order to allow the Border Patrol to remove razor wire the state has installed to maim and kill any migrants who try to cross the border. Declaring that they have a right to defend themselves from an “invasion” (based upon a fatuous reading of the constitution) Gov. Greg Abbott is refusing to comply. Essentially, he and the other GOP Governors are calling for “nullification” a concept we thought we had settled with the civil war. Apparently, these states have decided that they might just want another one.

Here’s the Governor of Oklahoma openly discussing a violent confrontation with the federal government.

Dear Leader is right there with them:

You read that right. The putative GOP Nominee for president is exhorting Republican governors to send the national guard to Texas to fight the federal government. It’s unclear how this is going to work out but we know now that these Governors are all on board the Trump train and eager to help him exacerbate the problem for his political gain. The GOP House and Senate could only dream of being this coordinated. The new power center of the MAGA movement is in the states and if you’re getting a feeling of deja vu, you’re not alone. We’ve been here before.

Salon