Skip to content

772 search results for ""voter fraud""

The biggest, the best the most everything…

I think that must have ruined his day. In fact, it ruined his month. He thinks he and Tom Brady are dopplegangers.

Here’s a little excerpt from “I Alone Can Fix It” illustrating, once again, his even more delusional state of mind these days. It’s from an interview at Mar-a-lago after the election:

“This is the biggest, the best, the most acreage, the most everything—the ocean, the lake, it fronts both,” the ever-boasting Trump said. “Mar-a-Lago is ocean-to-lake. Did you know that? Mar-a-Lago, ocean to lake. It’s the only place. See that window? That window, when that was built, is the largest pane of glass in the world, okay?”

Trump started the interview by pointing out his enduring and unrivaled power within the Republican Party. He explained that he didn’t intend to follow the path of former presidents, who largely bowed out of the nitty-gritty of party politics. He was proud to say he genuinely enjoys this sport he found so late in life, and believes he plays it better than anyone else. The parade of Republican politicians flocking to Mar-a-Lago all spring to kiss his ring had both energized him, he said, and proved the value of his stock.

“We have had so many, and so many are coming in,” Trump said. “It’s been pretty amazing. You see the numbers. They need the endorsement. I don’t say this in a braggadocious way, but if they don’t get the endorsement, they don’t win.” 

But future elections were not front and center in his mind. A past election was. Trump was fixated on his loss in 2020, returning to this wound repeatedly throughout the interview. 

“In a certain way, I had two presidencies,” he said. In the first, when the economy was roaring, Trump argued that he had been unbeatable, never mind that his approval rating was never higher than 46 percent in the Gallup poll during his first three years as president.

“I think it would be hard if George Washington came back from the dead and he chose Abraham Lincoln as his vice president, I think it would have been very hard for them to beat me,” Trump said.

Then, he lamented, came his second presidency: the pandemic killed his chances.

Trump seemed determined as well to convince us that he actually had won, and handily, had it not been for the many people who had wronged him—the “evil people” who conspired to deny him his rightful second term.

“The greatest fraud ever perpetrated in this country was this last election,” Trump said. “It was rigged and it was stolen. It was both. It was a combination, and Bill Barr didn’t do anything about it.”

Trump faulted not only his attorney general, but Vice President Pence for lacking the bravery to do what was right.

“Had Mike Pence had the courage to send it back to the legislatures, you would have had a different outcome, in my opinion,” Trump said.

“I think that the vice president of the United States must protect the Constitution of the United States,” he added. “I don’t believe he’s just supposed to be a statue who gets these votes from the states and immediately hands them over. If you see fraud, then I believe you have an obligation to do one of a number of things.”

The irony was lost on Trump, however, that one of the central reasons he had prized Pence as his number two was his resemblance to a statue standing adoringly at his side.

Trump then invoked the nonanalogous example he had latched on to: “Thomas Jefferson was in the exact same position, but only one state, the state of Georgia. Did you know that? It’s true. ‘Hear ye, hear ye . . .’—was much more elegant in those days. It was, ‘Hear ye, hear ye, the  great state of Georgia is unable to accurately count its votes.’ Thomas Jefferson said, ‘Are you sure?’ They said, ‘Yes, we are sure.’ ‘Then we will take the votes from the great state of Georgia.’ He took them for him and the president.”

Trump continued, “So I said, ‘Mike, you can be Thomas Jefferson or you can be Mike Pence.’ What happened is, I had a very good relationship with Mike Pence—very good—but when you are handed these votes and before you even start about the individual corruptions, the people, the this, the that, all the different things that took place, when you are handed these votes…right there you should have sent them back to the legislatures.”

Later in the conversation, Trump again expressed his disappointment in Pence. “What courage would have been is to do what Thomas Jefferson did [and said], ‘We’re taking the votes,’” he said. “That would have been politically unacceptable. But sending it back to these legislatures, who now know that bad things happened, would have been very acceptable. And I could show you letters from legislators, big-scale letters from different states, the states we’re talking about. Had he done that, I think it would have been a great thing for our country.” But, he surmised, “I think he had bad advice.”

Trump argued that he stands apart from the presidents before him by the loyalty and intensity of his supporters. “There’s never been a base that screams out, with thirty-five thousand people, ‘We love you! We love you!’” he said. “That never happened to Ronald Reagan. It never happened to anybody. We have a base like no other. They’re very angry. That’s what happened  in Washington on the sixth. They went down because of the election fraud. The one thing that nobody says is how many people were there, because if you look at that real crowd, the crowd for the speech, I’ll bet you it was over a million people.”

What was Trump’s goal on January 6? What did he hope his supporters would do after he told them to march on the Capitol?

He chose to remark again on the size of the crowd. “I would venture to say I think it was the largest crowd I had ever spoken [to] before,” Trump said. “It was a loving crowd, too, by the way. There was a lot of love. I’ve heard that from everybody. Many, many people have told me that was a loving crowd. It was too bad, it was too bad that they did that.”

Pressed again, Trump said he had hoped his supporters would show up outside the Capitol but not enter the building. “In all fairness, the Capitol Police were ushering people in,” Trump said. “The Capitol Police were very friendly. They were hugging and kissing. You don’t see that. There’s plenty of tape on that.”

Trump didn’t mention the countless accounts of horrific violence—that of a riotous mob shoving a police officer to the ground, later threatening to shoot him with his own gun, or that of an insurrectionist bashing a flagpole into another police officer’s chest, or that of yet another officer howling in pain as he was compressed in a closing door.

“Personally, what I wanted is what they wanted,” Trump said of the rioters. “They showed up just to show support because I happen to believe the election was rigged at a level like nothing has ever been rigged before. There’s tremendous proof. There’s tremendous proof. Statistically, it wasn’t even possible that [Biden] won. Things such as, if you win Florida and Ohio and Iowa, there’s never been a loss.”

He was referring to conventional wisdom that historically the winner of the presidential election has carried that same trio of states that Trump won. This was one of the traits that had led Trump to the White House on full display: his extraordinary capacity to say things that were not true. He always seemed to have complete conviction in whatever product he was selling or argument he was making. He had an uncanny ability to say with a straight face, things are not as you’ve been told or even as you’ve seen with your own eyes. He could commit to a lie in the frame of his body and in the timbre of his voice so fully, despite all statistical and even video evidence to the contrary. 

At various points in our interview, Trump presented other examples of what he called proof the election had been stolen from him.

“Take all of the dead people that voted, and there were thousands of them, by the way. We have lists of obituaries,” Trump argued. “If you take the illegal immigrants that voted. If you take this—Indians that got paid to vote in different places. We had Indians getting paid to vote! Many, many different things, all election-changing.”

Trump zeroed in on large cities in Michigan and Pennsylvania, both of which he lost to Biden, that are home to many Black people and historically vote heavily Democratic. “Look, everyone knows that Detroit was so corrupt. Everyone knows that they literally beat up people there, they hurt people to get the vote watchers out, our vote watchers, Republican vote watchers,” he said. He added, “Philadelphia, highly corrupt in terms of elections. There were tremendous irregularities that went on there, including the fact that you had more votes than you had voters.”

He was still fixated on the debunked water main conspiracy in Fulton County, Georgia. “They say, ‘Water main break!,’ everyone leaves—everyone leaves—and then you have these people go in with two or three other people, all their people, run to the table where ballots are…this table which had a skirt on it, opened the skirt and took out the ballots and started stuffing the ballot boxes,” he said. “It was reported on every newscast.”

In his discussion of the “stolen” election, Trump grew more animated and specific about the long list of advisers and allies he considered disloyal. He said that Barr failed him as attorney general for not buying the conspiracy and for not dispatching the FBI to investigate Fulton County’s vote-tallying  process. To Trump’s mind, Barr had become too exhausted to act in his final months on the job. Trump also posited that Barr had grown too sensitive to media criticism, worried about his depiction as a loyal marionette who did the president’s bidding, that he backed away from properly investigating voter fraud.

“Bill Barr changed a lot,” Trump said. “He changed drastically, and in my opinion, he changed because of the media. The media is brilliant. I give them credit. I get it better than anybody that’s ever lived. Bill Barr came in because he was really legitimately incensed at what they were doing to me and the presidency on the Mueller hoax. He did a good job on the Russian hoax, right? And then as time went by, and what I should have done is said, ‘Bill, thank you very much. Great job.’”

The Department of Justice, he continued, “is loaded up with radical left, and Bill Barr was being portrayed as a puppet of mine. They said he’s my ‘personal lawyer,’ ‘he’ll do anything,’ and I said, ‘Here we go…’ He got more and more difficult, and I knew it. You know why? Because he’s a human being. Because that’s the way it works.”

Trump listed Barr’s sins: He didn’t charge James Comey or Andrew McCabe; he didn’t announce an investigation into Hunter Biden; and he didn’t bring an end to John Durham’s probe of the origins of the Russia investigation before the election. Trump speculated that Barr was motivated by personal pique rather than reality when he announced on December 1 that the Justice Department had uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the election outcome.

“Barr disliked me at the end, in my opinion, and that’s why he made the statement about the election, because he did not know,” Trump said. “And I like Bill Barr, just so you know. I think he started off as a great patriot, but I don’t believe he finished that way.”

Trump said he was also disappointed by federal judges—especially the three conservative justices he had nominated to the Supreme Court—for ruling against his campaign in the scores of lawsuits it filed or, in the case of the high court, declining to take the case. When we asked whether he needed better lawyers, considering so many courts had ruled there was not substantiated evidence of fraud nor merit to the cases brought before them, Trump said his legal team was not to blame.

“I needed better judges. The Supreme Court was afraid to take it,” Trump said, suggesting that justices might have declined to intervene in the election out of fear of stoking violence. Referring to the election result, Trump added, “It should have been reversed by the Supreme Court. I’m very disappointed in the Supreme Court because they did a very bad thing for the country.” 

Trump singled out Justice Brett Kavanaugh, suggesting that he should have tried to intervene in the election as payback for the president standing by his nomination in 2018 in the face of sexual assault allegations. “I’m very disappointed in Kavanaugh,” he said.

Trump’s chagrin was evident in many of his answers. He emphasized his feelings of victimhood.

“I had two jobs: running our country, and running it well, and survival,” Trump said. “I had the Mueller hoax. I had the witch hunt. It’s one big witch hunt that’s gone from the day I came down the escalator,” a reference to his 2015 campaign launch event in the lobby of New York’s Trump Tower.

“Nobody’s ever gone through what I have,” Trump added. “They got me on all phony stuff.”

Trump found fault with most of his fellow Republican leaders, past and present. Still clearly vexed by the ghost of the late Arizona senator John McCain, Trump without prompting brought up the party’s 2008 presidential nominee, whom he had attacked for years.

“John McCain was a bad guy,” he said of the decorated prisoner of war. “He was a bully and a nasty guy, bad guy. A lot of people disliked him. Last in his class in Annapolis. All that stuff, but he was a bad guy. I say it to you. I don’t care. Does it affect me? I won Arizona, okay? By a lot. Didn’t turn out that way in terms of the vote, but I won Arizona. Everyone knows it. He didn’t affect me. I won the first time. I won it the second time.”

Trump, who in fact lost Arizona to Biden, continued with this fix. “You know, I did three rallies in Arizona,” he said. “I never had an empty seat.” Governor Doug Ducey, who withstood Trump’s pressure to overturn the result, was “not a loyal party member,” according to the former president. “I think Ducey is a terrible Republican,” he said. “Ducey did everything he could to block voter integrity, to block people from making sure the vote was accurate.”

Trump also complained about former House Speaker Paul Ryan, whom he labeled a “super-RINO”—Republican in name only. And he said Mitch McConnell has “no personality” nor a killer political instinct. He faulted McConnell for refusing to eliminate the filibuster to ram through Republican legislation and for not persuading Senator Joe Manchin, the moderate Democrat from West Virginia, to switch parties. 

“He’s a stupid person,” Trump said of McConnell. “I don’t think he’s smart enough.”

“I tried to convince Mitch McConnell to get rid of the filibuster, to terminate it, so that we would get everything, and he was a knucklehead and he didn’t do it,” Trump said.

Trump said he wished he had had partners in Congress like Meade Esposito, who was the head of the Democratic Party machine in Brooklyn from the late 1960s to the early 1980s. Esposito, who was close to Trump and his late father, Fred Trump, was known for his patronage and commanded respect.

“Nobody would ever talk back to Meade Esposito. Meade Esposito didn’t have a RINO like a Mitt Romney, you know, or as I said, Ben Sasse, who’s a lightweight,” Trump said, invoking two Republican senators who sometimes criticized him. He added, “Mitch McConnell compared to Meade Esposito, it’s like a baby compared to a grownup football player with brains on top of everything else.”

Esposito had run a citywide patronage system that doled out important jobs to loyalists and people providing gifts and favors. The party boss gained a fearsome reputation for his intimidation tactics and connections to organized crime. Amid an investigation of his work, Esposito retired in 1983; he was convicted of offering a gratuity and interstate travel charges in 1987.

He sounds more puerile than ever. Infantile, actually. I think he’s regressing.

Arizona madness

Despite Peter Doocy’s clowning (see below) it appears that the Fox News division isn’t all-in on every aspect of the Big Lie. Last night anchor Bret Baier told the Trump cult that Trump didn’t win the Arizona election after all . And Dear Leader is NOT happy about it.

Trump was reacting to an Associated Press investigation that discredited his conspiracy theories about massive fraud in Arizona, a state which was won by Joe Biden.

“Arizona county election officials have identified fewer than 200 cases of potential voter fraud out of more than 3 million ballots cast in last year’s presidential election, further discrediting former President Donald Trump’s claims of a stolen election as his allies continue a disputed ballot review in the state’s most populous county,” the AP reported Friday.

That investigation angered the former president, who emailed a statement to reporters as he has banned from major social media platforms for laying about the election.

“Fox News and other media outlets incorrectly side with the outdated and terrible Maricopa County Election Board to report no fraud found in the Presidential Election. They spew the gross misinformation purposefully put out by the county and the Associated Press, and IGNORE the very important Arizona Senate’s hearing yesterday,” Trump said, while repeating debunked allegations about voter fraud.

“The same anchor at the desk the night Fox called Arizona for Joe Biden now wants you to believe there was no fraud. The anchor was Bret Baier,” Trump said.

The Senate hearing Trump refers to was another shitshow put on by the Big Lie-crazed Arizona GOP. It was not convincing although Trump practically had a public orgasm over it. The man is truly obsessed.

Meanwhile:

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich’s office has asked Secretary of State Katie Hobbs for potential evidence of illegal voting — a move that counters her request that he investigate a pressure campaign by former President Donald Trump’s allies to “stop the counting” last year. 

The attorney general’s email response pointedly notes that Hobbs, a Democrat, hasn’t submitted referrals for double voting. It marks the first time in more than a decade a secretary of state has not done so.

The Hobbs administration is waiting for a report from a national organization that works with states across the nation to help identify potential incidents of double voting, a spokesperson for Hobbs said Friday.

The email, sent Wednesday to the Secretary of State’s Office and obtained Friday by The Arizona Republic, was sent by Jennifer Wright, an assistant attorney general who focuses on Brnovich’s election integrity unit.

The correspondence marks the first public sign that Brnovich, a Republican running for the U.S. Senate, intends to examine public records in the aftermath of The Republic’s reporting, which first detailed the pressure campaign

The Republic found Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and Kelli Ward, the chairwoman of the Arizona Republican Party, repeatedly reached out to Maricopa County officials to try to influence the election outcome.

In a letter to Brnovich last week, Hobbs, a Democrat running for governor, said some of the communications The Republic reported on “involve clear efforts to induce supervisors to refuse to comply with their duties.” Her office obtained the same records the newspaper reviewed after obtaining them through a public-records request and offered to send them to Brnovich’s office.

A spokeswoman for Hobbs said the secretary of state was sending the records to the Attorney General’s Office on Friday.

A spokesman for Brnovich declined to comment on the email to Hobbs. The agency typically does not confirm or deny investigations.

Wright added, “Additionally, please provide any and all records your office possesses related to potential violations of Arizona’s election laws,” a reference to the pressure campaign.

The pressure from Trump’s allies focused intensely on Maricopa County Supervisor Clint Hickman, a lifelong Republican who had been supportive of Trump’s presidential reelection campaign.

At the time, Hickman chaired the five-member Republican-controlled board, which oversees elections in the state’s most populous county. He let two phone calls from the White House switchboard, which sought to connect him to Trump, go to voicemail.

Text messages and voicemails obtained by The Republic show multipronged attempts by Ward to halt Trump’s impending loss to President Joe Biden in Arizona.

She tried to get the supervisors “to stop the counting,” delay certifying the results and to look into whether voting software added votes for Democrats, among other things.

Ward has not responded to The Republic’s repeated efforts to reach her about the communications. On Twitter, she wrote in response to a story about her communications: “BS.”

Later, she wrote, “No one can ever say that I am not doing everything I can to assure #ElectionIntegrity. And I always will! #ProudAmerican.”

Brnovich has faced criticism from Trump for not vocally backing the ongoing ballot review ordered by the state’s Senate. For his part, Brnovich has sought to clamp down on illegal voting, especially at a time when many Republicans see election integrity as a remedy to what they view as a presidential election tainted by widespread fraud.

Kelli Ward is an imbecile.

I have my doubts that Brnovich is going to follow through on anything relating to the pressure campaign. Defying Trump isn’t considered a smart move for Republicans seeking higher office. But you never know …

“Based” and proud of it

Screen cap from Vice’s “The Rise and Fall of an Alt-Right Gladiator“.

Once upon a time in America, “rednecks” beat up “hippies” for having long hair. That was the 1960s and early 1970s. Then country music stars began sporting mullets. Rednecks followed suit.

Much of movement conservatism grew out of backlash to the various liberations of the 1960s: the Civil Rights movement, women’s liberation, the sexual revolution. Conservative leaders derided the left as radical, anti-American, and having no core values. “Anything goes.” “Do your own thing.” “Moral relativism,” they warned. Then, like rednecks before them, the right followed its cultural icons down darker paths than they accused adversaries of pursuing.

People who raised us at the height of the Cold War warned us that communists would use propaganda and disinformation to destroy America from within. Now, many of those same Real Americans™, self-described patriots, consider trafficking in propaganda and disinformation good, clean fun for the whole family. They are people of the lie. They know it’s wrong and they don’t care.

Monday’s court hearing in Detroit with Team Kraken lawyers proves the case. The Big Lie legal team keeps insisting it be allowed an evidentiary hearing where they can enter into the public record 960 affidavits from people who saw something they thought meant something about which they knew nothing. The documents generated by a Trump voter fraud hotline and website are worthless as evidence, U.S. District Judge Linda V. Parker told them, citing a few. But the truth is not the point. Having courts provide the veneer of credibility to wild accusations is. Lawyers — officers of the court — trying to spin lies into truth is why their careers are on the line.

Dahlia Lithwick considers the legacy of Trumpism and concludes that the lies were always the point:

Back when Donald Trump was the main one telling lies and his boosters were scrambling all around him to make it so, there was a certain comic quality to it all: What was the point in distorting weather maps or crowd sizes just to flatter a weirdo narcissist? Experts in authoritarianism were warning that this type of manipulation was how strongmen cling to power, sure, but it seemed easy enough to push it away and assume that once he was no longer president, the persistent flattery and adjusting of reality for his benefit would stop. But it’s now clear that the falsehood itself is the endgame …

The temptation has always been to try to sort the Trump lies into the hilarious ones and the pernicious ones, but that, too, misses the point. If the lying itself is the objective, the difference between the clueless whopper and the sly distortion is immaterial; in fact, the clueless whopper can be more potent because it offers up greater spectacle and affords more opportunity for performing loyalty. As recently as the second impeachment, the clueless whopper—about peaceful protesters and false flag antifa activists at the capitol—lived largely in the fever swamps. A few months later, it is being parroted by Trump and members of the Senate. The Big Lie, however absurd it might be, can overtake reality so fast the only trick anyone need master is the patience to ride it out. That means the only strategy needed for liars is to repeat the lie. Trump, who had little mastery of most skills, was always a wizard at this move.

For years, Trump used the phrase “many people are saying” to essentially mean “someday people will be saying.” He did so understanding that if you say such things enough times, someone somewhere will parrot it as a fundamental truth, and then your initial statement will be true(ish—many people will be saying the untrue thing). “Many people are saying [this lie]” was always code for “if we get people to say [this lie], it will seem true.” Trump’s admission of that principle at CPAC on Sunday gave away the game. He confessed, about polling numbers, that “if it’s bad, I say it’s fake. If it’s good, I say, that’s the most accurate poll perhaps ever.” The lie thus goes from a fiction in the lizard brain of a dangerously delusional man to headline news to gospel for people who have been trained to invert whatever they see from the news. In which case why wouldn’t Rudy Giuliani advise Trump on election night 2020 that he should simply lie and claim victory? That had been the game all along.

Being able to rewrite history and define reality (or redefine it at will) is perhaps the ultimate power, Orwell thought. Authoritarians such as Trump crave the power Stalin once had. Adhering to norms and societal standards is for the weak. And if there is one thing that makes conservatives cringe it is weakness.

Dave Weigel considers how “based” and “cringe” have become codewords on the right. He explains:

“Based,” an old term usually traced to 1980s cocaine slang, was resurrected by rapper Lil B to mean “not being scared of what people think about you” and “not being afraid to do what you want to do.”

The term gained traction among Trumpists during the 2016 campaign and has survived Trump’s 2020 loss the way Trumpism has survived it.

It’s not complicated, so long as you ignore the usual liberal and conservative labels and view political debate through two frames — “based” or “cringe.” Based means behaving how you want to behave, confident in the belief that you’re right, and that your opposition knows it. Cringe means following rules that you did not write, hewing to norms and tradition and nuance, and broadcasting your own sensitivity to the feelings of others. The cringe politician assumes that the world is changing and he or she had better get ahead of it; the based politician assumes that he or she can stay in the old world and force everyone else to adapt. Nobody claims to be cringe, but plenty of people claim to be based. Part of the fun of declaring yourself being based is getting to label the other side as weak, wrong and pathetic — and, well, cringe.

Half a century after the Lewis Powell memo and the conservative backlash to liberation and long hair, conservatives have let theirs down. What trickled down from the Reagan era was their commitment to ethics and American democratic principles such as one person/one vote. Republicans have devolved from being the “the party of ideas” to being the party of bad ones (Max Boot) or none at all.

Fifty years on, Trump’s radicalized party is anything but conservative. They can lie with abandon. They can flaunt the law. They can be based and proud of it. They can hate anyone openly and boast that it is a sign of strength, not abandonment of principle, community and mutual respect. They haven’t saved the country for conservatism. They’ve been liberated from it.

“Show me the freakin’ kraken, for crying out loud.”

A federal judge took Team Kraken to the woodshed in a Zoom hearing on Monday over their misuse of judicial process to undermine Joe Biden’s November 2020 presidential victory on loser Donald Trump’s behalf. I didn’t catch it all, but what I did see was priceless:

U.S. District Judge Linda V. Parker said she would rule on a request to discipline the lawyers in coming weeks. But over and over again during the more than five-hour hearing, she pointedly pressed the lawyers involved — including Trump allies Sidney Powell and L. Lin Wood — to explain what steps they had taken to ensure their court filings in the case filed last year had been accurate. She appeared astonished by many of their answers.

While their suit aimed to create a broad impression that the vote in Michigan — and specifically Detroit’s Wayne County — had been troubled, the affidavits filed to support those claims included obvious errors, speculation and basic misunderstandings of how elections are generally conducted in the state, Parker said.

“There’s a duty that counsel has that when you’re submitting a sworn statement . . . that you have reviewed it, that you had done some minimal due diligence,” she said.

The groups efforts were part of a national strategy of challenging certified election results in state after state that Trump lost last November. Trump and his supporters claimed, “We have so much evidence” supporting “widespread, nationwide voter fraud.” What they had was less than vaporware.

If Parker decides to discipline the lawyers, she could require them to pay the fees of their opponents in the case, the city of Detroit and Michigan state officials. But she could also go further — assessing additional monetary penalties or recommending grievance proceedings be opened that could result in banning the attorneys from practicing in Michigan or disbarring them altogether.

[…]

One of the first substantial repercussions came last month, when a committee of judges in New York state suspended the law license of former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, who served as Trump’s personal attorney. The committee found that Giuliani had “communicated demonstrably false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers and the public at large” in violation of his ethical obligations as an attorney.

Giuliani, Powell, and MyPillow chief executive Mike Lindell are being sued in a 1.3 billion series of defamation suits brought by Dominion Voting Systems. Dominion accuses the trio of a “viral disinformation campaign” alleging the company’s machines flipped Trump votes to Biden.

The judge noted that one observer stated in an affidavit that she believed she saw election workers switching votes from Trump to Biden. Parker asked whether any of the lawyers had spoken to the witness and inquired what exactly she saw that led her to believe that votes had been switched. She was greeted with silence.

“Anyone?” she asked again.

When no one answered a second time, she said: “Let the record reflect that no one made that inquiry, which was central to [the] allegation.”

She focused on another statement from a witness who swore he saw individuals placing clear plastic bags into a mail truck — and said he believed the bags “could be ballots” headed for Detroit’s counting facility.

The judge called that allegation “really fantastical” and “speculative.”

“I don’t think I’ve really ever seen an affidavit that has made so many leaps,” she said. “My question to counsel here is, how could any of you as officers of the court present this type of an affidavit?”

Julia Haller, one of the lawyers who filed the original suit, responded that the statement accurately reflected what the man believed he had seen and that the affidavits should be viewed collectively as suggesting a “pattern of fraud.”

“The very fact that we filed 960 affidavits with our complaint shows extraordinary due diligence on our part,” Powell said.

Powell claims to possess nearly a thousand affidavits from people who saw something they thought meant something about which they knew nothing. That is, what the Krakens lacked in quality, they tried to make up with quantity.

Parker told Powell flatly that volume does not imply legitimacy.

DavidFink, a lawyer for the city of Detroit, told the judge Monday that the lawsuit had helped undermine faith in the election and helped lead directly to the Jan. 6 attack. “We can’t undo what happened, but this court can do something to let the world know that attorneys in this country are not free to use our courts to tell lies,” he said.

Forbes adds:

Powell and Wood spread baseless conspiracy theories in the wake of the election and alleged widespread fraud, leading even the Trump Administration and campaign to distance themselves from Powell and helping fringe theories about election fraud to gain steam on the far right. The Michigan lawsuit is one of four battleground lawsuits Powell filed—all of which failed, including at the U.S. Supreme Court—and Wood also brought his own failed lawsuit in Georgia. In addition to the Michigan sanctions decision, Powell is also facing sanctions and attorneys fees in Wisconsin and a separate effort by Michigan officials to have her disbarred, as well as two defamation lawsuits from voting machine companies Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic. Wood is now under investigation from the State Bar of Georgia over his post-election conduct, which could result in him being disbarred.

This entire disinformation campaign has been a fantastical web of lies.

The reason the country is in such as state of decay now is that for decades we as a country have refused to hold a certain class of scoundrel accountable for their crimes and destructive public mischief. Judge Parker has a chance to turn that around, at least outside Washington, D.C. New York’s legal hammer is descending on the Trump crime family. More needs doing inside the Beltway. Perhaps if Parker leads the way, others there might grow a spine.

You call this a democracy?

You cannot see this as anything but rank intimidation of Black voters. It is outrageous, absolutely disgusting:

On Wednesday, Texas police arrested and charged Hervis Rogers, a 62-year-old Black man whose story of endurance despite voter suppression efforts went viral during the 2020 presidential primaries.

Rogers faces two felony counts of illegal voting for casting ballots before he’d fully completed his parole for a previous crime, scheduled to end June 13, 2020. Texas election code says people who receive felony convictions can vote only after they have completed their sentence, including parole. The law says if someone knowingly votes illegally, they can be found guilty of a crime. 

Rogers gained notoriety last March when he was the last person to cast a ballot at a Texas precinct where he’d waited seven hours. Rogers was widely celebrated for his commitment to voting despite ongoing racism embedded in Texas’ elections, in which officials routinely overburden and under-resourced precincts serving Black communities.

After his arrest last week, Rogers’ attorney Andre Segura said Rogers was unaware he was ineligible to vote and his prosecution should raise concerns. 

“The arrest and prosecution of Mr. Rogers should alarm all Texans,” said Segura, a lawyer with the Texas ACLU branch. “He faces potentially decades in jail. Our laws should not intimidate people from voting by increasing the risk of prosecution for, at worst, innocent mistakes. We will continue to fight for justice for Mr. Rogers and will push back against efforts to further restrict voting rights.”

Another attorney with the ACLU of Texas, Tommy Buser-Clancy, said Rogers potentially faces up to 40 years in prison. 

In 2007, then-Gov. Rick Perry vetoed a bill that would have required law enforcement officials to notify people charged with crimes when they became eligible to vote.

Please tell me the difference between these obscene laws and Vladimir Putin’s Russia? They seem to be pretty much the same thing to me.

While you have the GOP saying violent insurrectionists are being persecuted despite the fact that they are being held for assault and battery, their lapdogs in the state are doing things like this:

Rogers’ arrest harks back to the case of Crystal Mason, a Black Texan who was arrested after the 2016 election during which she cast a provisional ballot while she was ineligible to vote. The now-46-year-old woman said she was unaware of her ineligibility. Her appeal of the case is pending before the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

Rogers was being held in jail on $100,000 bond until receiving bail assistance from The Bail Project, a nonprofit organization that provides support to people charged with crimes who earn low incomes.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who is currently under investigation by the Texas State Bar for filing an unsuccessful lawsuit to overturn the 2020 election, posted a tweet announcing his office would prosecute Rogers. Paxton remains one of the most prominent figures to back Donald Trump’s claims that widespread voter fraud in Black and brown communities cost Trump the 2020 election. In fact, there is no evidence voter fraud was a factor in the race, which Trump lost to Joe Biden. 

Still, inspired by Trump’s claims, conservatives across the country have worked more feverishly than usual to restrict ballot access ahead of the 2022 elections. Texas Republicans are hoping to enact some of the most restrictive voting measures in the country out of the hundreds that have been introduced since November.

Here we have the state stepping up to intimidate voters. And if the Texas GOP has its way they are going to be enlisting MAGA insurrectionist types to help:

In Texas, there is a long history of violent voter suppression by poll watchers, and thus, rising concern about vigilantes being empowered to act on anti-democratic rhetoric concerning who should be allowed to vote.

They just can’t stop themselves

Mo Brooks:

In a speech to the conservative gathering, Brooks, who is running for U.S. Senate with former President Donald Trump’s endorsement, stated, “Our choice is simple: we can surrender and submit, or we can fight back.”

Brooks invoked soldiers in the American Revolution who “fought at Valley Forge,” the site of one of the Continental Army’s winter encampments, adding, “that’s the kind of sacrifice we have to think about.”

Brooks has faced both a censure effort and a lawsuit from House Democrats for telling Trump supporters at a rally shortly before the Capitol riot, “today is the day American patriots start taking down names and kicking ass.”

Brooks asked attendees at CPAC on Friday if they are “willing to fight for America” and whether America is “worth fighting for,” declaring, “Do it! Do it! Do it!”

Brooks also painted a grim and hyperbolic picture of a country led by Democrats, telling attendees he has “never felt such fear for the future of our country” because “dictatorial socialists want to cancel America.”

CRUCIAL QUOTE

Brooks, in his speech, reiterated his belief in Trump’s false claims that the 2020 election was stolen through widespread voter fraud. “They attack our republic by engaging in unparalleled voter fraud and election theft activities,” he said of Democrats.

KEY BACKGROUND

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-N.Y.) is suing Brooks and Trump, as well as Donald Trump Jr. and Rudy Giuliani, for their alleged roles in inciting the Jan. 6 riot. Brooks’ legal team has sought to dismiss the lawsuit by arguing Brooks was acting in his official capacity as a congressman and is thus immune to such civil litigation.

TANGENT

The far-right wing of the GOP made its presence known at the event on Friday, which featured booths selling merchandise promoting the fringe QAnon conspiracy movement and cards touting a “7-pt. Plan to restore Donald J. Trump in days, not years.” Attendees were also reportedly concerned about conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and white nationalist Nick Fuentes making appearances.

Since when do they do CPAC in the middle of the summer?

By the way:

Political Ear Worms

Following up on the post below, I came across this from 15 years ago:

I have believed that Republicans might claim vote fraud in this election for some time. I wrote back in June [2006]:

The Republicans have figured out something that the Democrats refuse to understand. All political messages can be useful, no matter which side has created it. You use them all situationally. The Republicans have been adopting our slogans and memes for years. They get that the way people hear this stuff often is not in a particularly partisan sense. They just hear it, in a sort of disembodied way. Over time they become comfortable with it and it can be exploited for all sorts of different reasons.

In this instance, there has been a steady underground rumbling about stolen elections since 2000. Now, we know that it’s the Republicans who have been doing the stealing —- and the complaining has been coming from our side. But all most people hear is “stolen election” and they are just as likely to paste that charge onto us as they are onto them. It’s like an ear worm. You don’t necessarily even like the song, but you can’t get it out of your head.

We have created an ear worm that the Republicans are going to appropriate — and they will use it much more aggressively and effectively than our side did. They are already gearing up for it. As I mentioned a month or so ago, Karl Rove was at the Republican Lawyers Association talking about how the Democrats are stealing elections:

QUESTION: The question I have: The Democrats seem to want to make this year an election about integrity, and we know that their party rests on the base of election fraud. And we know that, in some states, some of our folks are pushing for election measures like voter ID.

But have you thought about using the bully pulpit of the White House to talk about election reform and an election integrity agenda that would put the Democrats back on the defensive?

ROVE: Yes, it’s an interesting idea. We’ve got a few more things to do before the political silly season gets going, really hot and heavy. But yes, this is a real problem. What is it — five wards in the city of Milwaukee have more voters than adults?

With all due respect to the City of Brotherly Love, Norcross Roanblank’s (ph) home turf, I do not believe that 100 percent of the living adults in this city of Philadelphia are registered, which is what election statistics would lead you to believe.

I mean, there are parts of Texas where we haven’t been able to pull that thing off.

(LAUGHTER)

And we’ve been after it for a great many years.

So I mean, this is a growing problem.

The spectacle in Washington state; the attempts, in the aftermath of the 2000 election to disqualify military voters in Florida, or to, in one instance, disqualify every absentee voter in Seminole county — I mean, these are pretty extraordinary measures that should give us all pause.

The efforts in St. Louis to keep the polls opened — open in selected precincts — I mean, I would love to have that happen as long, as I could pick the precincts.

This is a real problem. And it is not going away.

I mean, Bernalillo County, New Mexico will have a problem after the next election, just like it has had after the last two elections.

I mean, I remember election night, 2000, when they said, oops, we just made a little mistake; we failed to count 55,000 ballots in Bernalillo; we’ll be back to you tomorrow.

(LAUGHTER)

That is a problem. And I don’t care whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat, a vegetarian or a beef-eater, this is an issue that ought to concern you because, at the heart of it, our democracy depends upon the integrity of the ballot place. And if you cannot…

(APPLAUSE)

I have to admit, too — look, I’m not a lawyer. So all I’ve got to rely on is common sense. But what is the matter? I go to the grocery store and I want to cash a check to pay for my groceries, I’ve got to show a little bit of ID.

Why should it not be reasonable and responsible to say that when people show up at the voting place, they ought to be able to prove who they are by showing some form of ID?

We can make arrangements for those who don’t have driver’s licenses. We can have provisional ballots, so that if there is a question that arises, we have a way to check that ballot. But it is fundamentally fair and appropriate to say, if you’re going to show up and claim to be somebody, you better be able to prove it, when it comes to the most sacred thing we have been a democracy, which is our right of expression at the ballot.

And if not, let’s just not kid ourselves, that elections will not be about the true expression of the people in electing their government, it will be a question of who can stuff it the best and most. And that is not healthy.

QUESTION: I’ve been reading some articles about different states, notably in the west, going to mail-in ballots and maybe even toying with the idea of online ballots. Are you concerned about this, in the sense of a mass potential, obviously, for voter fraud that this might have in the West?

ROVE: Yes. And I’m really worried about online voting, because we do not know all the ways that one can jimmy the system. All we know is that there are many ways to jimmy the system.

I’m also concerned about the increasing problems with mail-in ballots. Having last night cast my mail-in ballot for the April 11 run-off in Texas, in which there was one race left in Kerr County to settle — but I am worried about it because the mail-in ballots, particularly in the Northwest, strike me as problematic.

I remember in 2000, that we had reports of people — you know, the practice in Oregon is everybody gets their ballot mailed to them and then you fill it out.

And one of the practices is that people will go to political rallies and turn in their ballots. And we received reports in the 2000 election — which, remember we lost Oregon by 5000 votes — we got reports of people showing up at Republican rallies and passing around the holder to get your ballot, and then people not being able to recognize who those people were and not certain that all those ballots got turned in.

On Election Day, I remember, in the city of Portland, Multnomah County — I’m going to mispronounce the name — but there were four of voting places in the city, for those of you who don’t get the ballots, well, we had to put out 100 lawyers that day in Portland, because we had people showing up with library cards, voting at multiple places.

I mean, why was it that those young people showed up at all four places, showing their library card from one library in the Portland area? I mean, there’s a problem with this.

And I know we need to make arrangements for those people who don’t live in the community in which they are registered to vote or for people who are going to be away for Election Day or who are ill or for whom it’s a real difficulty to get to the polls. But we need to have procedures in place that allow us to monitor it.

And in the city of Portland, we could not monitor. If somebody showed up at one of those four voting locations, we couldn’t monitor whether they had already cast their mail-in ballot or not. And we lost the state by 5,000 votes.

I mean, come on. What kind of confidence can you have in that system? So yes, we’ve got to do more about it.

Nobody can ever accuse these Republicans of not having balls. It’s really breathtaking sometimes. This is not an isolated remark. Here’s an excerpt from yesterday’s Chris Matthews show:

MATTHEWS: … What did you make—we just showed the tape, David Shuster just showed that tape of a woman candidate in the United States openly advising people in this country illegally to vote illegally.

MEHLMAN: It sounds like she may have been an adviser to that Washington state candidate for governor or some other places around the country where this has happened in other cases with Democrats.

But the fact is, one thing we know, the American people believe that legal voters should vote and they believe that their right to vote ought to be protected from people that don‘t have the right to vote.

Rove was talking to the Republican lawyers association, many members of which specialize in “voter fraud,” and may very well be preparing to challenge every close race and file spurious complaints to Alberto Gonzales’ Justice Department.

And even if they didn’t, be prepared to hear all of our complaints about election stealing yelled back at us if they lose. They are not afraid to take somebody else’s talking point and use it to their advantage. It’s one of the things they do best and because a lot of people don’t pay close attention it will sound perfectly reasonable to them that the Democrats stole the election.

Just something to think about as we look to the morning after election day.

One other thing Rove said during that talk before the GOP lawyers:

Well, I learned all I needed to know about election integrity from the college Republicans.

I don’t doubt it for a moment.

That was 2006. I don’t think we can blame Trump for this one.

Even with the indictment, Trump is thrilled

Donald Trump’s company and its chief financial officer were indicted on Thursday on multiple felony counts and the prosecutors went to some lengths to say they weren’t finished yet. In a sane world, one would think that presents a real problem for a man who is planning to run for president but this is Trump we’re talking about and he’s survived dozens of legal challenges as a businessman and as a politician so it’s a fairly good bet he’ll wriggle out of this one too. After all, in the last 18 months he’s been impeached twice, botched the handling of a historic global pandemic resulting in more than 600,000 American deaths, incited an insurrection against the US Congress and his supporters love him more than ever. He famously said he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any votes and it appears to literally be true.

This is probably why he is reportedly happy about the indictments, “thrilled” they are what he thinks of as light charges, and anticipating how the cases can be leveraged for his big comeback in 2024 because it will “hurt Sleepy Joe.” He plans to make this latest “witch hunt” a theme of his upcoming rallies and since his political career has been built upon relentless whining, which his followers eat up with a spoon, he may just be right.

Since January 6th, there is a very powerful, unspoken threat should any real danger to Trump and his future plans present itself: violence. It’s doubtful that anyone involved in these or any other cases aren’t constantly weighing the risks against the benefits in taking steps to hold Trump accountable. He’s gotten away with so much that even grounded, rational people have to be asking themselves if he’s literally made a deal with the devil.

According to Politico, people around him say that while he has been spending some time at Trump Tower (since he’s summering at his Bedminster Golf Club) and has been concerned about these cases, it’s far from his top priority.

Aides said that Trump’s interest in the Manhattan D.A.’s case pales in comparison to his obsession with the idea that he could still prove to be the winner of the 2020 election. “His world is seriously consumed by that,” said another Trump adviser. “In comparison to election fraud, [the D.A.’s investigation] is not even close.” According to this adviser, Trump is holding out hope that if the Arizona “audit”/fishing expedition ends up in his favor, a few other states will follow suit, triggering some sort of legal process that would make him president.

He’s even questioned the merits of the Constitution, if it can’t be used to investigate election fraud.

He must have been awfully pleased to see that the Supreme Court seemed to agree with him, at least to the extent that states should be able to make it as hard for people to vote as possible, ostensibly to protect itself from voter fraud, which doesn’t exist. Thursday’s ruling on the voting case Brnovich v. DNC, from Arizona, ground zero for Trump’s Big Lie hysteria, with the full conservative bloc coming together to further weaken the Voting Rights Act, must have made his day.

The court upheld a series of voter restrictions much like the ones that are popping up all over the country in the wake of Trump’s Big Lie, although it did not, as was feared, completely eliminate all barriers to such restrictions. It created a new set of criteria for determining if a voting law is discriminatory, one of which seems to say that any restrictions which may have been in place in 1982 (when the Voting Rights Act was amended) are acceptable. (I guess this is yet another form of “originalism?”) The majority opinion cites this example:

“it is relevant that in 1982 States typically required nearly all voters to cast their ballots in person on election day and allowed only narrow and tightly defined categories of voters to cast absentee ballots.”

So much for mail-in voting.

That opinion was written by Samuel Alito, a sure signal to the GOP establishment that this one was for them. (Alito is, by far, the most flagrantly partisan Justice on the court.) This decision, which endorses the idea that states can restrict voting because of (non-existent) voter fraud is solely a Republican Party project. This decision makes it clear that while this court may throw a bone to the left once in a while, when it comes down to securing power for the Republican Party, their allegiance is clear. Mitch McConnell must have strained a muscle patting himself on the back for his efforts to make that happen.

At this point, the entire Republican establishment, which includes the Supreme Court majority, is working together to take advantage of the opening Trump’s Big Lie has given them. The party strategically targeted the states that Biden won closely and is feverishly passing laws to disenfranchise Democratic voters there. At the same time they are assiduously working to disempower any form of non-partisan oversight of the election apparatus.In fact, they are using every lever of power at their disposal, from legislative control in the states, to the filibuster and the Supreme Court.

Yet even in light of that, the Democrats are saying that any changes to voting laws must be bipartisan and are letting the GOP get away with obstructing voting legislation for the dumbest possible reason: they think they need to hold on to the filibuster to stop Mitch McConnell and a future GOP president from doing things they don’t like in the future. As if McConnell and the Republicans haven’t made it crystal clear that they will do as they like by any means necessary. If Republicans need to nuke the filibuster in the future they will not hesitate to do it. In fact, they may do it just to troll the libs the minute they get back the majority.

The consensus among the political press is that this battle is over. CNN’s Senior White House correspondent Phil Mattingly insisted on Thursday that the handful of Democrats who believe this drivel are not going to change their minds and the rest of the party is accepting their fate, with the White House planning to fall back on the “bully pulpit” to tell people how they might avoid the undemocratic roadblocks the Republicans are putting in their way.

That’s right. The party that controls the House, the Senate and the White House apparently believes it is impotent to protect American democracy from a bunch of right-wing crazies who worship Donald Trump so they’re planning to give some speeches instead.

If this cynical consensus is right (and I fervently hope it isn’t) all I can say is that it’s a good thing we have an empathetic mourner-in-chief in Joe Biden to comfort us when our democracy finally dies. Unfortunately, we probably won’t be able to hear his consoling words over the giddy laughter of Trump and the Republicans. They couldn’t have dreamed the Democrats would go down so easily. 

Salon

What is this democracy you speak of?

So the ultra politically partisan Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito wrote today’s majority opinion further gutting the voting rights act, which figures. The Court is willing to throw a few bones to the libs just to pretend that they are not a wholly partisan institution devoted to protecting the wealthy, corporations and the Republican Party. But when it comes right down to it, they’re going to make sure their real constituency is taken care of.

The fact that there has been absolutely no proof of any systemic voter fraud means absolutely nothing. They are determined to let Republicans suppress the vote as much as they need to. I guess we just have to hope at this point that they go so far that they suppress their own dipshit voters too.

As with everything else political, the stolen, undemocratic Supreme Court conservative majority is completely out of step with the American people:

By a roughly 2-to-1 margin, Americans prioritize making lawful voting easier rather than making voter fraud more difficult, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll released Thursday.

The poll finds 62 percent of adults saying it is more important to pass new laws “making it easier for people to vote lawfully,” while 30 percent say it’s more important to pass new laws “making it harder for people to vote fraudulently.”

The poll was conducted just before the Supreme Court upheld two Arizona voting restrictions that a lower court had said discriminated against minority voters, with experts saying the decision could make it harder to challenge some new voting restrictions being passed following former president Donald Trump’s false claims of widespread voter fraud.

The Post-ABC poll finds sharp partisan and racial differences on what new voting laws should focus on. A 59 percent majority of Republicans say it’s more important to pass new laws making it harder to vote fraudulently, while 62 percent of independents and 89 percent of Democrats say new laws should make it easier for people to vote lawfully.

An 82 percent majority of Black adults say it’s more important to make it easier for people to vote lawfully, compared with 67 percent of Hispanic adults and 58 percent of White adults.

The Post-ABC poll was conducted June 27-30 among a random national sample of 907 adults; the margin of sampling error for overall results is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points and error margins are larger among subgroups.

The GOP’s white majority is letting the country know that they will protect their privileges by any means necessary.

Oh, and by the way, the court’s other parting shot was to strike down a California law that required rich political donors to put their names where their money is. They aren’t concerned about average Americans having to go through hoops to vote in this country. But wealthy wingnuts shouldn’t have to reveal who they are financially supporting. God bless America.

“The Big Rig”

They’re not talking about a truck…

The head of Arizona Republicans’ controversial “audit” of 2020presidential ballots was revealed Saturday as the anonymous star of a new movieclaiming the election was stolen, raising questions about how credible any upcoming report from the supposed audit could be.

The revelation of Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan’s involvement in the conspiracy theory movie The Deep Rig came at the film’s premiere in a church on the outskirts of Phoenix, as Arizona Republicans gathered to celebrate the count’s end.

The Deep Rig, which is based on a book by former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne, features an array of discredited voter-fraud hunters presenting a hodgepodge of theories claiming that Joe Biden stole the election from Donald Trump. But while Deep Rig’s claims may be on the fringe, its premiere drew support from top Arizona Republican officials, with GOP state Sen. Sonny Borrelli and Reps. Mark Finchem and Walt Blackman in the audience.

As the head of Cyber Ninjas, Logan was in charge of the audit of 2.3 million ballots ordered by the Republican-controlled state Senate. For much of The Deep Rig, Logan’s identity is obscured through blurring and a voice modulator, identified only as “Anon” as he argues that the CIA was behind “disinformation” around the election.

Towards the end of the film, however, Logan’s identity is revealed. The crowd of a couple hundred people at the premiere at Phoenix’s Dream City Church exploded in applause when Logan was revealed as the conspiratorial “Anon.”

While the Deep Rig audience was thrilled to see Logan in the film, his participation had long been suspected by reporters tracking the audit. In a trailer for the film released in early June, Logan’s voice wasn’t changed, meaning that “Anon” was quickly identified as Logan himself.

The Cyber Ninjas audit has been criticized by both elections experts and the Justice Department, with observers noting audit procedures often changed or were nonsensical. After the premiere, auditor Bob Hughes told the audience that the audit included procedures to find bamboo fibers, which would have supposedly revealed the ballots were manufactured in Asia.

Along with Logan, The Deep Rig featured amateur election-fraud sleuths pushing baseless claims. Another segment of the film centered on activist Joe Oltmann, who claimed to have infiltrated a local “antifa” conference call ahead of the election and discovered them talking about a man named “Eric” rigging the election.

In the aftermath of the vote, Oltmann’s claims were embraced by right-wing media as supposed evidence that Dominion Voting Systems employee Eric Coomer stole the election. That false allegation has proven to be totally baseless, however, with right-wing outlet Newsmax retracting its claims against Coomer in May.

The Deep Rig was directed by Roger R. Richards, whose UFO conspiracy theory movie Above Majestic posited aliens were involved in the 9/11 attacks. While mainstream reporters often struggled to report from the stadium where the audit was being conducted, the footage from Deep Rig’s suggests its team had close-up access to the inspections, filming ballots from the counting floor.

Conspiracy theorists were given prominent roles at the film’s premiere. In the lobby, a group of right-wing activists manned a booth with brochures claiming that the United States is in fact a bankrupt corporation ruled by London, urging attendees to declare their “real” American citizenship.

The event was hosted by Ann Vandersteel, a prominent QAnon booster. QAnon references also appeared in the film, with former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn wearing bracelets bearing the QAnon slogan ‘Where we go one, we go all’ during his interview in the movie.

But not everyone who believed in the voter fraud conspiracies outlined in the film was universally welcome at the premiereA brief speech at the event from QAnon conspiracy theorist Austin Steinbart, who has claimed to be Q himself and is known as “Baby Q” to his supporters, set off a minor controversy.

Steinbart, who helped find the church as the location for the premiere, is set to appear in an upcoming film from Richards about QAnon. Steinbart addressed the audience before the film was shown to promote his series of QAnon-themed meet-up groups, but didn’t mention QAnon, telling The Daily Beast later that a member of Byrne’s camp asked him not to bring up the conspiracy theory.

Steinbart, who is controversial even among other QAnon believers, has been derided as a would-be cult leader or fame-seeker by more prominent QAnon promoters. Steinbart also has a checkered legal history, after being pleading guilty to a felony in April. Steinbart’s legal travails with federal prosecutors included being busted with a synthetic penis, in an apparent attempt to evade drug tests for marijuana while out on bail.

[…]

The premiere doubled as a party for Republicans activists in the state who had pushed lawmakers to organize the audit. While any report from Cyber Ninjas is likely to be hotly disputed, Republicans have seized on a report as the first step in overturning Arizona’s 2020 results, or even somehow putting Trump back in the White House.

Shelby Busch, a conservative activist who was one of the audit’s most vocal backers, urged audience-members to keep an election-fraud journal to share with their descendants.

“Your great-grandkids are going to talk about this day, and they’re going to be able to say, ‘My grandma and my grandpa, guess what?’” Busch said. “‘They wrote history.’”

When she’s right, she’s right.

I just don’t know what to say about these people. So I’ll just let that sit there. It would be funny and/or pathetic if they weren’t all violent neo-fascists.

There is much more detail at the link. Go ahead. Grab a shot of tequila and read it all.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try refining your search: