Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

The Big Break-up

French President Emmanuel Macron came to the White House this week and his old pal President Donald Trump didn’t even greet him at the door as the protocol requires for visiting world leaders. It’s not the most important norm that Trump has thrown in the garbage can in his first month in office but it’s a telling one. The president doesn’t consider it necessary to show respect to America’s traditional allies anymore. Macron might as well have been a door-to-door salesman.

They didn’t hold hands as much as they did in Trump’s first term but they did hold a couple of fairly congenial press avails in which the two leaders pretended to be friends and Macron very gently corrected Trump on a couple of his most egregious lies about Ukraine, namely that the US had spent more than Europe on military aid to the war torn country and that Ukraine had started the war. Overall, it didn’t seem to accomplish much since Trump has come to believe that he will be seen as a great peacemaker if he forces Ukraine to surrender to Russia while America’s erstwhile allies are coming to understand that he could not care less what they think about anything.

Macron is scheduled to debrief the European heads of state today and tomorrow the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer will be at the White House to try another round which will likely have the same result. All this urgent diplomacy came after Trump had accused France and the UK of not having done anything in three years to “end the war.” and Macron called a a crisis meeting of European leaders in Paris last week to discuss next steps. They’ll convene again this weekend after Starmer returns home to see where they stand.

I understand that they have to try, despite the writing being on the wall. After all, the alliances that were formed after WWII to ensure there would not be another catastrophic world war held together the peace, prosperity, and security of the last 80 years. Abruptly destroying them on the whim of a vengeful, 78 year old would-be strongman whose definition of an ally is one that unquestionably does his bidding with no question of reciprocation is difficult to accept. But it seems they have no choice and the consequences are monumental.

One of the main purposes of the NATO alliance and the rest of the American security guarantees of the past 80 years was to ensure that the long standing enmity between the nations involved in the two World Wars would not compel them to re-arm and do it all again. The brief alliance between the U.S. and the Soviets to beat the Nazis didn’t last and the Cold War that ensued featured proxy wars all over the world as the two nuclear powers competed for influence. But that stand-off did manage to prevent the worst case scenario and the United States and its allies ultimately prevailed with the break-up of the Soviet Union accomplished without another massive conflagration.

That happened over 35 years ago now and it was not a ridiculous notion to think that a re-evaluation of that post WWII world order was overdue. Even though Trump’s reasoning was puerile and uninformed, it wasn’t a completely outrageous request in his first term that Europe should pick up more of the tab for their national defense. America’s security umbrella was expensive and the world was changing so a pull back to allow others to take a bigger role wasn’t a totally crazy idea.

But then Russia invaded Ukraine and the logic of the NATO alliance was quite suddenly made relevant again. In fact it was so relevant that countries that had long held back from joining the alliance, Finland and Sweden, were so alarmed by the Russian aggression that they finally joined up. The alliance agreed to supply Ukraine with the military supplies and arms it would need to defend itself, not merely out of sympathy but the knowledge that this kind of aggression was exactly how things had gotten out of control twice before. As it turns out 80 years isn’t very long in the great scheme of things after all.

Unfortunately, Donald Trump is oblivious to all that and wouldn’t care anyway. For reasons no one may ever fully understand he has an almost preternatural affinity for Russian president Vladimir Putin and seethes with resentment toward Europe. Given that it has elected Donald Trump twice, Europe is belatedly realizing that the US is no longer a reliable ally and are speaking openly about arming up. The UK’s Starmer announced this week that they plan to substantially raise defense spending (at the expense of foreign aid) and Germany’s new Chancellor Friedrich Merz made it clear in a speech after the election last weekend that his country would no longer be dependent on the US for its security.

Politico reported:

The Trump administration does not care about Europe and is aligning with Russia, said Merz, who is on course to become Germany’s new leader. The continent, he warned, must urgently strengthen its defenses and potentially even find a replacement for NATO — within months. […]

“My absolute priority will be to strengthen Europe as quickly as possible so that, step by step, we can really achieve independence from the USA,” Germany’s chancellor-in-waiting said. “I never thought I would have to say something like this on a television program. But after Donald Trump’s statements last week at the latest, it is clear that the Americans, at least this part of the Americans, this administration, are largely indifferent to the fate of Europe.” 

You can’t blame them. But in light of the neo-fascist AfD coming in second in the election he just won, you can’t blame some of us for feeling a little nervous about where that may lead. But we have only ourselves to blame.

He’s not wrong that the US is aligning with Russia and they are right to be nervous as well. The sell-out of Ukraine began almost the moment Trump took office. He has excluded them (and the European allies) from “peace talks,” extorted natural resources as “compensation” for the money America has spent on its defense, demanded that Russia be allowed back in the G7, called Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky a dictator and said that Ukraine started the war. At the UN on Tuesday the US joined Russia, Belarus and North Korea, in opposing a resolution condemning Moscow’s war against Ukraine. All of this has been done without asking anything of Russia. In fact, it comes with a promise to lift sanctions and work on joint economic ventures.

The post WWII alliances are being tossed aside in favor of new ones with strongman leaders such as Vladimir Putin, China’s Xi Jinping, Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Saudi Arabia’s Mohammed Bin Salman, all of which are based upon Trump’s personal admiration for their leaders not any sort of strategic logic. The world has begun to accept that this is real and are adjusting accordingly.

The UKs Financial Times published a mournful requiem for the great post war alliance the other day which ended with these words:

After three generations of US leadership, it is always tempting to believe that Trump does not mean what he says. Perhaps this is a feint in some grand art of the deal. But allies and erstwhile friends must banish those self-soothing thoughts. With Trump, what you see is what you get. America has turned. 

Salon

Fighting The Coup

Yes, you can

Friends asked last night (not in so many words) what they could do to stop the rapid unscheduled dissassembly of the United States by Musk-Trump. They feel helpless. They are not. They feel overwhelmed. That’s not surprising given the sheer volume and breadth of the attacks. But they need a place to focus. The shadow president is not the only party to the Project 2025 sabotage.

The need for action is immediate for a response to the GOP’s vote Tuesday night to gut Medicaid.

Jason Statler offers

We can still stop the GOP from destroying Medicaid

But it’s going to a national pushback that scares Republicans more than Trump.

What you need to know about this fight that truly just began last night.

This vote was to start the process of the cuts. It WILL come back for a final vote.There are some chances to slow or potentially stop it. Need constant pressure on GOPFocus on GOP swing seats & key committees. Energy & Commerce is where the Medicaid fight will go down. Ways&Means for tax fight.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@aoc.bsky.social) 2025-02-26T03:09:58.767Z

Via Statler’s The Last Billionaires:

So what to do?

Call your Republican reps if you have them—House and Senate. Use this tool about the damage the GOP budget would do to shame them. Tell them (and everyone) that the Children’s Hospital Association opposes these cuts. Then, please share what you told them on social media in any way you can.

BONUS: Join or start a Musk or Us event. We’ve got to be visible and in the faces of every possible Republican.

More from Rogan’s List here.

When can we stop them

If you’re like me, you may need to dig deeper. You may want to know, for instance, that Medicaid fraud primarily comes from providers, not families who rely on it.

You’ll also probably appreciate this thread from Bobby Kogan, the Senior Director of Federal Budget Policy at the Center for American Progress, which I’m posting below.

House Rs just passed the budget resolution, the first step in their process to enact a bill that'd kick millions off Medicaid & cut SNAP down to just $1.60 per person per meal on avg while cutting taxes for the top 0.1% by $278k – all while increasing the debt🧵on what's to come and WHERE TO FIGHT

Bobby Kogan (@bbkogan.bsky.social) 2025-02-26T01:22:41.160Z

Kogan provides more detail, but the key is not to sit on your hands.

No one is coming to save you.

* * * * *

Have you fought the coup today?
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink

The Fall Gal

As some day it may happen that a victim must be found

Amy Gleason via LinkedIn.

The word has gone forth that “corrupt judges” be impeached. “Corrupt” is unofficially defined among MAGA drones as any federal magistrate who impedes Musk-Trump’s rapid unscheduled disassembly (RUD) of the U.S. government.

Kase Wickman outlines for Vanity Fair the precipitating event behind Rep. Mike Lee’s outburst on Tuesday. It seems Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly believes this whole “DOGE” thing may be unconstitutional:

“Based on the limited record I have before me, I have some concerns about the constitutionality of U.S.D.S.’s structure and operations,” Kollar-Kotelly said Monday in a Washington Federal District Court hearing, invoking the initials of DOGE’s rarely-used government name, the U.S. DOGE Service and sidestepping the group’s legendarily dumbass meme-inspired acronym. Leaders of government agencies—which, given the power and access that DOGE has, it would appear to be—must be nominated by the president and confirmed by Congress. Musk, who has gotten access to a kajillion personnel files and other sensitive information between sending his never-ending stream of jackass tweets and ghosting on (some of) the mothers of his various offspring, did not go through this process.

To put it in terms that memelords like Musk might more easily understand: much overstep. fascist wow. many illegal. what boss. lol.

Confusion reigns among federal employees about whom to heed when the unelected, possibly unconstitutional Musk sends out jerkish directives contradicted by superiors, reaffirmed by the nominal president, and then not.

On top of Kollar-Kotelly, another judge put the brakes on DOGE on Monday (Associated Press):

A judge agreed Monday to temporarily bar two federal agencies from disclosing records containing sensitive personal information to representatives of billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency.

U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman in Greenbelt, Maryland, ruled that the Department of Education and the Office of Personnel Management likely violated the Privacy Act by disclosing people’s personal information to DOGE without their consent.

Boardman issued a temporary restraining order requested by attorneys for unions and groups representing current and former federal employees.

How dare she. Musk needs access to that information to feed into the program he’s building to automate the firing of government employees! Off with her head! And Kollar-Kotelly’s too!

Then there are the mass resignations plaguing the RUD (VF again):

On Tuesday, 21 DOGE employees resigned en masse, writing in an open letter addressed to Trump chief of staff Susie Wiles that they objected to being asked to “compromise core government systems, jeopardize Americans’ sensitive data, or dismantle critical public services.”

“We swore to serve the American people and uphold our oath to the Constitution across presidential administrations,” the letter continued. “However, it has become clear that we can no longer honor those commitments at the United States DOGE Service.”

In the immortal words of the Muppets, even the vegetables don’t like him.

Who installed all these women judges?

“Mr. Musk is not the U.S. DOGE Service Administrator,” Joshua Fisher of the Trump White House told U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan. But the White House has been evasive about who is.

The White House needs someone to blame for Musk’s increasing bad press and growing hostility from constituents, especially in Republican districts.

Clearly, Musk gets protected by virtue of his magnificent brain and prodigious net worth. The administration needs a fall guy. Um, make that fall gal. Ta-da!

After repeatedly refusing to identify the administrator of the new Department of Government Efficiency, the Trump administration on Tuesday pointed to Amy Gleason, a former U.S. Digital Service official, as the operation’s acting administrator.

A White House official granted anonymity to speak openly confirmed to POLITICO that Gleason — who, according to her LinkedIn, served as a digital services expert at U.S. Digital Service during Trump’s first term and most recently worked as chief product officer at Nashville health care firm Russell Street Ventures — is helming the operation.

The White House has avoided naming the DOGE administrator for weeks. Earlier Tuesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt dodged multiple questions on the matter, saying: “I’m not going to reveal the name of that individual from this podium.”

Ms. Gleason is about to discover the truth of Rick Wilson’s maxim, Everything Trump Touches Dies.

* * * * *

Have you fought the coup today?
Choose Democracy
Indivisible: A Guide to Democracy on the Brink

Your President Ladies And Gentlemen

In the middle of delicate negotiations, he posts this:

Tell me he isn’t suffering from extreme delusions of grandeur.

Between the gutting of the Intelligence community and the FBI and the crude, dismissive way he’s dealing with the Palestinians, it will be a miracle if we don’t have a catastrophic terrorist attack.

Some Of His Best Friends Are Russian Oligarchs

Jesus H. Christ:

U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday floated the idea of replacing a visa program for foreign investors with a so-called “gold card” that could be bought for $5 million as a route to American citizenship.

Trump told reporters he will replace the “EB-5” immigrant investor visa program, which allows foreign investors of large sums of money that create or preserve U.S. jobs to become permanent residents, with a so-called “gold card.”

“We are going to be selling a gold card,” Trump said. “We are going to be putting a price on that card of about $5 million,” he added.

“It’s going to give you green card privileges plus its going to be a route to (American) citizenship, and wealthy people would be coming into our country by buying this card,” Trump said, adding that details about the scheme will come out in two weeks.

I honestly have no words except Jesus H. Christ.

Trump added it is possible Russian oligarchs could qualify for the gold cards, when asked by a journalist if those people would be eligible. “Yeah, possibly. Hey. I know some Russian oligarchs that are very nice people,” he said.

I’ll bet he does.

I’m sorry. It’s time for a shot.

Crackpots And Fools

Nightmare from hell

Michelle Goldberg on the appointment of the internet troll Dan Bongino to be the second in command of the FBI. Oh boy:

In writing about our country’s rapid self-immolation, I try to ration Hannah Arendt references, lest every column be about the ways “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” published in 1951, foreshadows the waking nightmare that is this government. But contemplating Bongino’s ascension, it’s hard to avoid the famous Arendt quote, “Totalitarianism in power invariably replaces all first-rate talents, regardless of their sympathies, with those crackpots and fools whose lack of intelligence and creativity is still the best guarantee of their loyalty.” Trump could have found a smoother and more sophisticated ideologue to help him transform the F.B.I. into a tool of his will, perhaps someone from the Claremont Institute ready to put an erudite spin on authoritarianism. He wanted the jacked-up hothead.

This administration professes a devotion to merit-based hiring, blaming diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives for fostering mediocrity. It should go without saying, however, that excellence is of little interest to the Trumpists, who delight in scandalizing a meritocracy that spurned them. Writing of the conditions in which both Hitler and Stalin arose, Arendt described a spirit of deep, corrosive cynicism and nihilistic glee at the inversion of old standards. “It seemed revolutionary to admit cruelty, disregard of human values, and general amorality, because this at least destroyed the duplicity upon which the existing society seemed to rest,” she wrote. Sound familiar?

Does it ever.

She describes our current moment as an interregnum where “Trump and his coterie are laying the foundation for autocracy but have yet to fully consolidate their power” and I think that’s right. The problem is that while we can see what’s happening, there’s still a part of us that believes it’s unthinkable. It’s thinkable. The appointment of Patel and Bongino to run America’s powerful national police force shows just how fragile the system that’s keeping us from finally tipping over really is.

Let’s Look At Those Cuts, Shall We?

I thought that was a nice succinct rundown of the actual economics of Musk’s trainwreck. Unsurprisingly, they will not end up benefiting Americans in either the short or the long term. He didn’t even mention the cutting off of scientific and medical research funds which will actively cause suffering and death. And I won’t be surprised to see them get rid of any kind of credible data collection and analysis by the government, including the economic data the markets rely upon, which means the world will end up flying blind.

They are not doing this to save money or create efficiency. Why would Musk care about that? They are doing it to create openings for people like him (and Trump) to privatize the government and personally profit. They may actually believe that they are better at everything and that it might end up benefiting the peasants in the long run. (It won’t.) But never think that’s their primary motivation. They want to get rid of regulations, cut taxes and take over the necessary functions of the government at a profit.

Musk’s Little Plot Is Not Popular

Today’s newsletter by Dan Pfeiffer on how to make the GOP pay for this insanity:

I have seen this movie before, beat for beat.

In August of 2010, in the middle of the effort to pass the Affordable Care Act, Congress went home for a month-long recess. At every townhall and interaction with their constituents, they were bombarded with complaints from voters angry about the pending health care bill. Democrats were shaken. The process slowed as the party brainstormed a response to this backlash. More importantly, a media narrative was born. The Affordable Care Act became polarizing — something to fear. Previously, most Americans paid little attention to the arcane efforts towards health care reform. They learned about it from news coverage of people angrily screaming about the dangers of the bill.

We’ve since learned that much of that energy was “astro-turfed” by Republican groups funded by Right Wing billionaires like the Kochs and the Tea Party Movement. It was as much about the election of a Black president as it was the size and scope of government.

The angry townhalls are back. This time, voters are furious about the chaotic, clumsy, and counter-productive cuts from Elon Musk’s DOGE Commission.

I can guarantee that there has been no astroturfing of these. They are 100% organic grassroots.

Pfeiffer has some ideas about the growing alarm among average citizens:

Democrats need to channel and communicate this dissatisfaction. Back in 2017 when Trump was trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act, there were several efforts to organize attendance at GOP townhalls — oftentimes this meant simply publicizing the details of when and where the townhalls were being held. I have no doubt that many of the same Democratic groups that did this in 2017 are doing it again, but this is priority number one. We need support from the highest echelons of the Democratic Party as well as media personalities with platforms.

He points out that Republicans eventually stopped having town halls at all and that means the Democrats have to start having them. He writes:

Democratic presidential hopefuls (of which there are many) should go to places where the DOGE cuts are most impactful like Atlanta, Georgia, Birmingham, Alabama, and the Research Triangle in North Carolina and hold townhalls. They should be real townhalls. Open invitation. Don’t pack the crowd with supporters. Prepare for uncomfortable conversations and protestors. The drama will draw coverage and conversation. Lean into the risk.

Yes! Lean into the risk! Get attention and have some faith that if you are in the right people will see that.

He also makes the point that it’s important to be specific about what’s happening. Some of us are moved by paeans to “democracy” but most people need to see what these freaks are doing in detail and often how it affects real people. Using that list in the graph above can help people focus on specific issues. But he warns that people (including politicians) should concentrate on the issues they feel most passionately about and not sound like they’re parroting polling,

He also makes the case that we should center Musk, who people like even less than Trump. (People have heard the complaints about Trump for a decade already.) Musk is an attention magnet and attention is now the currency of the political realm, for better or worse.

All of this sounds reasonable to me but I suspect there has not yet been enough carnage to really get people’s full attention. But it’s coming. And we should be prepared for it.

The DOGEbro Dumpster Fire

Screen shot of the top DOGE “experts” coming back from grabbing lunch at Chipotle with their body guard.

On the heels of Musk’s inane email to all federal workers over the weekend, telling them to respond with 5 bullet points justifying their work week or get fired, there’s this. It should make the hair on the back of your neck stand up.

More than 20 civil service employees resigned Tuesday from billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, saying they were refusing to use their technical expertise to “dismantle critical public services.”

“We swore to serve the American people and uphold our oath to the Constitution across presidential administrations,” the 21 staffers wrote in a joint resignation letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press. “However, it has become clear that we can no longer honor those commitments.”

The employees also warned that many of those enlisted by Musk to help him slash the size of the federal government under President Donald Trump’s administration were political ideologues who did not have the necessary skills or experience for the task ahead of them.

[…]

All had previously held senior roles at such tech companies as Google and Amazon and wrote in their resignation letter that they joined the government out of a sense of duty to public service.

This is just creepy:

The day after Trump’s inauguration, the staffers wrote, they were called into a series of interviews that foreshadowed the secretive and disruptive work of Musk’s’ Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.

According to the staffers, people wearing White House visitors’ badges, some of whom would not give their names, grilled the nonpartisan employees about their qualifications and politics. Some made statements that indicated they had a limited technical understanding. Many were young and seemed guided by ideology and fandom of Musk — not improving government technology.

“Several of these interviewers refused to identify themselves, asked questions about political loyalty, attempted to pit colleagues against each other, and demonstrated limited technical ability,” the staffers wrote in their letter. “This process created significant security risks.”

Earlier this month, about 40 staffers in the office were laid off. The firings dealt a devastating blow to the government’s ability to administer and safeguard its own technological footprint, they wrote.

“These highly skilled civil servants were working to modernize Social Security, veterans’ services, tax filing, health care, disaster relief, student aid, and other critical services,” the resignation letter states. “Their removal endangers millions of Americans who rely on these services every day. The sudden loss of their technology expertise makes critical systems and American’s data less safe.” Those who remained, about 65 staffers, were integrated into DOGE’s government-slashing effort. About a third of them quit Tuesday.

“We will not use our skills as technologists to compromise core government systems, jeopardize Americans’ sensitive data, or dismantle critical public services,” they wrote. “We will not lend our expertise to carry out or legitimize DOGE’s actions.”

What’s up with those who are left, I wonder? Are they dedicated to being “guardrails” or are they on board with the dumpster fire? I guess it doesn’t really matter. The fact is that we are very vulnerable right now to a catastrophic failure at the hands of Musk and his little DOGE bros. Look at them in the picture above. Those are the people handling the private data of every American.

Trust ’em?

These people clearly don’t and I suspect they know what they’re talking about. Musk thinks he’s running one of his own companies.

Just FYI: Tesla has about 125,000 employees worldwide, X has about 2800 and Space X has about 13,000. (By contrast, Amazon employs about 1.6 million, Walmart employs over 2.1 million.) Does running those companies give Musk any special insight into how to run the most complex institution in the world– the U.S. Government?

No. The man is a rich megalomaniac and the moron who has empowered him thinks that he is a genius because his uncle taught at MIT. People like that are the reason why legal roadblocks have been constructed to keep this much power out of the hands of such individuals. Sadly, nobody ever contemplated that a president would be so criminally reckless that he would simply ignore the law and put the whole country at risk.

This Is A Bad Country In Which To Be An Old, Poor Person

I had no idea how much people loathed the elderly until recently when I saw a lot of comments like that during the pandemic. Even now, you’ll hear echoes of it when people point out that at least a third of Medicaid spending is for people in nursing homes. (I won’t even mention the way even decent, liberal minded people casually and crudely insult old people in regular conversation.) Let’s just say there isn’t much respect, much less simple human empathy, for people over 65 in America.

I hope every American will be lucky enough to be a billionaire when they get old, (or are lucky enough to die young) because being dependent on people like Donald Trump and Elon Musk to uphold programs you depend on is no way to live. And I’m not honestly not sure anymore that a majority of this country would object all that strenuously to ending them.