This is Clinton's only mode. She doesn't have another. She's a lawyer from Chicago ffs.
The problem was never Clinton, who was always a very popular politician except for whenever she was running.
The problem is strong women are popular right up until they ask for a promotion. https://t.co/prLqOy7I27
— Patrick S. Tomlinson (@stealthygeek) March 3, 2026
Hillary Clinton is a sharp lawyer and she made an important point in that testimony the other day about why the committee should be particularly suspicious of Trump’s relationship with Epstein and should call him, of all people, to testify. It’s about the pattern of behavior over many, many years.
During her Feb. 26, 2026 testimony, Hillary Clinton said President Donald Trump should be questioned under oath about his appearances in the Epstein files, citing his civil liability in the E. Jean Carroll case and his 2024 criminal convictions over hush money payments. She argued these reflected a “pattern” relevant to the committee’s inquiry. Trump has denied wrongdoing in all matters and is seeking Supreme Court review of the Carroll verdict.
I would argue that the Access Hollywood tape and the credible accusations by dozens of other women about his assaults is also relevant. And as I’ve noted before even the deposition in his first divorce by former wife Ivanka indicates that he was prone to sexual violence.
There were a lot of people who had relationships with Epstein. Some of it certainly had to do with women but the majority of them also cultivated him over money, power and his vast network of contacts and friends as well. With Trump it was all about the women. The NY Times had this piece about their relationship a couple of months ago:
Beginning in the late 1980s, the two men forged a bond intense enough to leave others who knew them with the impression that they were each other’s closest friend, The Times found. Mr. Epstein was then a little-known financier who cultivated mystery around the scope and source of his self-made wealth. Mr. Trump, six years older, was a real estate scion who relished publicity and exaggerated his successes. Neither man drank or did drugs. They pursued women in a game of ego and dominance. Female bodies were currency.
Over nearly two decades, as Mr. Trump cut a swath through the party circuits of New York and Florida, Mr. Epstein was perhaps his most reliable wingman. During the 1990s and early 2000s,they prowled Mr. Epstein’s Manhattan mansion and Mr. Trump’s Plaza Hotel, at least one of Mr. Trump’s Atlantic City casinos and both their Palm Beach homes. They visited each other’s offices and spoke often by phone, according to other former Epstein employees and women who spent time in his homes.
With other men, Mr. Epstein might discuss tax shelters, international affairs or neuroscience. With Mr. Trump, he talked about sex.
Trump was very close with Epstein and his relationship with him was entirely based on their pursuit of women. I would say that makes him a prime suspect in Epstein’s sex trafficking operation.
Hegseth: "Death and destruction from the sky all day long. We're playing for keeps. Our warfighters have maximum authorities granted personally by the president and yours truly. Our rules of engagement are bold, precise, and designed to unleash American power, not shackle it …… pic.twitter.com/L5hJ5uZSVw
Hegseth: “Death and destruction from the sky all day long. We’re playing for keeps. Our warfighters have maximum authorities granted personally by the president and yours truly. Our rules of engagement are bold, precise, and designed to unleash American power, not shackle it … we are punching them while they are down”
Hit ’em where they hurt boys! Elementary schools! Nursing homes! Hospitals! No more woke rules of engagement!
Hegseth: "To our steadfast partner, Israel. Your mission is being executed with unmatched skill and iron determination. Fighting shoulder to shoulder with such a capable ally is a true force multiplier and a breath of fresh air." pic.twitter.com/SKv8Cz0UkI
Hegseth: "This is what the fake news misses. We've taken control of Iran's airspace and waterways without boots on the ground. But when a few drones get through or tragic things happen, it's front page news. I get it — the press only wants to make the president look bad, but try… pic.twitter.com/vpW6z85ZPz
Hegseth: “This is what the fake news misses. We’ve taken control of Iran’s airspace and waterways without boots on the ground. But when a few drones get through or tragic things happen, it’s front page news. I get it — the press only wants to make the president look bad, but try for once to report the reality”
Hegseth’s absurdities illustrate how big an opening Democrats really have here. It’s not enough to demand that officials be forthcoming and transparent. Democrats should argue that Trump has launched what is essentially a vanity war and nothing more—and that, as Smith put it to me, he’s “ruling like a king instead of the elected president of a constitutional republic.”
Two votes. At the risk of putting national readers to sleep, this is a big deal in North Carolina (Axios):
State Senate leader Phil Berger, the most influential Republican in the N.C. General Assembly, trails by just two votes in a closely watched primary on Tuesday against Rockingham County Sheriff Sam Page, with all precincts reported.
The race is too close to call and is likely to go to a recount given its razor-thin margin.
Why it matters: A potential Berger loss would change the landscape of Raleigh’s politics and eventually lead to a leadership transition later this year in the Republican-dominated state Senate.
That takeover led to a state gerrymandered to within an inch of its life. Also, battles over redistricting maps and voter ID that reached the U.S. Supreme Court multipletimes, a six-month state Supreme Court recount fight, and the infamous “bathroom bill.” Those fights have gone on for a decade and a half.
“We always knew that the potential existed for this to be close,” Berger said Tuesday night. “I think you could say this is close.”
Once local Boards of Election count absentee and provisional ballots, Berger or Page may ask for a recount if either trails by less than 1% of the total vote. Ask state Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs what happens next.
The big-money race came with an endorsement for Berger from President Donald Trump and an avalanche of negative ads. Page, a popular long-tenured sheriff, won handily in the candidates’ home county of Rockingham, but Berger was able to draw close by winning Guilford County precincts, where Page is not as well known.
Berger’s campaign fund and independent political action committees supporting him were on track to spend about $10 million dragging down Page and promoting Berger.
Berger has led the state Senate since 2011, and is one of the most powerful politicians in North Carolina. He has prime responsibility for the state’s rightward turn in tax, environmental, education and other policies. He has been a prolific fundraiser.
Page was first elected Rockingham sheriff in 1998, while Berger has represented the district in the state Senate since 2001.
In 2023, Page and Berger clashed over Berger’s push to allow casinos in rural parts of the state, including Rockingham. Page was a vocal critic of the controversial plan, which Berger later abandoned.
What’s unclear at the moment is how much the erosion of MAGA support for Donald Trump has trickled down to officials like Berger, particularly among the state’s independent (unaffiliated) voters, now the largest tranche of N.C. registrants (39%; Ds and Rs are tied at 30%). Independents hold the key to election results in November both here and elsewhere.
I lose sleep over independent voters. N.C. Democrats lost state Supreme Court Chief Justice Cheri Beasley’s seat in 2020 by 401 votes. They barely hung onto state Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs’s seat in 2024 by 734 votes. Now the infamous state Sen. Phil Berger risks losing his state Senate seat by a handful of votes. These squeakers are becoming routine. We expect Republicans trying to win in Republican-dominated courts what they lose at the ballot box to become routine. And that’s after layer upon layer of GOP voter-suppression legerdemain fails to rig elections in their favor.
Democrats do a pretty repectable job of turning out their voters in this state. Where we fail is in turning out friendly UNAffiliateds in the right places. We can’t squeeze enough blood from the Democratic base to overcome an UNA vote that in 2024 went 54% for Donald Trump, even if they turned out 6% less than Democrats. We have to make up the difference with blue UNA votes we’re leaving on the table in our urban counties.
Michael Bitzer of Old North State Politics finds them in early voting perhaps moving in our direction:
Early voting totals have surpassed both the 2022 midterm primary and the 2024 presidential primary at the same point in the calendar. That alone makes this cycle notable. But the real story is not simply about aggregate numbers — it is about who is voting, which ballot they are pulling, and how those choices compare to recent cycles.
The top-line figure suggests heightened engagement. Yet beneath that surface lies a far more revealing set of dynamics: a Democratic primary outperforming recent benchmarks, an unusually strong Unaffiliated tilt toward the Democratic ballot, and a geographic pattern that reinforces the state’s now-familiar urban–suburban–rural divide.
Bitzer observes:
Democrats appear to have generated disproportionate early energy, both among registered partisans and among Unaffiliated voters. The fact that more than half of Unaffiliated voters chose the Democratic ballot — reversing the traditional “go where the action is” pattern — is one of the cycle’s most intriguing developments. Whether that reflects competitive dynamics, ideological sorting, or strategic crossover voting will require deeper post-election analysis.
Moral? Assume nothing and take nothing and no one for granted. Every vote counts.
Terror, violence, and corruption is the Trump brand
If you expected to wake up to Tuesday primary returns from across the country or more news from Donald Trump’s preemptive attempt to trigger Armageddon, hold on. Pete Hegseth’s warfighters have another propaganda video for you. But first, the news.
US and Ecuadorian forces have launched joint operations to combat drug trafficking, the US Southern Command said on Tuesday, but neither side gave more details.
Southern Command, which encompasses 31 countries through South and Central America and the Caribbean, said in a statement on X that the “decisive action” was aimed at combating illicit drug trafficking.
The Ecuador defense ministry said details of the offensive operations were classified.
In a 30-second video released by the military’s Southern Command, a helicopter is seen taking off in early morning or dusk, flying over an area, then picking up soldiers. The U.S. official said the video depicted the first in what was expected to be a series of raids across the country, some with U.S. advisers nearby assisting, some with Ecuadorian forces only. In this instance, involving mostly Ecuadorian forces, the official said, it was unclear what the mission’s objective was or whether it was successful.
But content? Hegseth’s social media crusaders made sure to deliver content.
Terror, violence, and corruption
The propaganda video released by the U.S. Southern Command includes a statement:
On March 3, Ecuadorian and U.S. military forces launched operations against Designated Terrorist Organizations in Ecuador. The operations are a powerful example of the commitment of partners in Latin America and the Caribbean to combat the scourge of narco-terrorism.
Together, we are taking decisive action to confront narco-terrorists who have long inflicted terror, violence, and corruption on citizens throughout the hemisphere.
“We commend the men and women of the Ecuadorian armed forces for their unwavering commitment to this fight, demonstrating courage and resolve through continued actions against narco-terrorists in their country.” – #SOUTHCOM Commander Gen. Francis L. Donovan.
Terror, violence, and corruption? That’s pretty rich coming from a Trump administration that’s spent the last year terrorizing American cities and brutalizing citizens and non-citizens alike while lining its pockets to the tune of $4 billion dollars.
“Ethics watchdogs say that no other President has ever so nakedly exploited his position, or on such a scale,” wrote David D. Kirkpatrick in The New Yorker at the end of January.
While otherwise behaving like a war criminal, The Times notes:
Since early September, the United States has killed at least 150 people in 44 known strikes against boats in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific that the Trump administration has said, without providing evidence, are carrying drugs.
Legal specialists on the use of lethal force have said the strikes are illegal, extrajudicial killings, because the military cannot deliberately target civilians who do not pose an imminent threat of violence, even if they are suspected of engaging in criminal acts.
But the Department of WAR has gotcher social media content right here:
On March 3, Ecuadorian and U.S. military forces launched operations against Designated Terrorist Organizations in Ecuador. The operations are a powerful example of the commitment of partners in Latin America and the Caribbean to combat the scourge of narco-terrorism.
Comedian Trae Crowder imagines the post-hoc propaganda poster for the Iran War reading, “Uncle Sam wants you to die for Israel’s paranoid blood lust.” He wonders how many MAGA types will finally walk away from Trump over the Iran War.
I’ve been messaging this week with this three-word roadside attraction. The dearth of middle fingers from MAGA isolationists suggests not even they want to engage the question.
Iran has posed an imminent risk to the United States for 47 years as they’ve maimed and killed thousands of Americans without that vast missile arsenal. The president was right to act when he did.
I don’t think the word “imminent” means what he thinks it does.
imminent
American
[im–uh-nuhnt]/ ˈɪm ə nənt /
adjective
likely to occur at any moment; impending.Her death is imminent.
He’s supposed to be one of the smart ones.
Update —
welp:
Lindsey Graham: "The whole idea is for it to not be imminent, dumbass. You want it prevent it from being imminent." pic.twitter.com/5qYDpnouQu
That’s called “preventive war” and it’s illegal. I mean, you could justify attacking anyone on the basis of the idea that they might launch an attack on you some day. At this point that could apply to every country in the world.
The U.S. joined Israel in striking Iran early Saturday morning. By Monday evening, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, or MRFF, was “inundated” with complaints, receiving more than 110 grievances from U.S. military personnel stationed at dozens of sites across the Middle East, reported independent journalist Jonathan Larsen.
One such note included an anecdote from a noncommissioned officer, who reported that their commander had “urged us to tell our troops that this was ‘all part of God’s divine plan’ and he specifically referenced numerous citations out of the Book of Revelation referring to Armageddon and the imminent return of Jesus Christ.”
The NCO’s complaint was lodged on behalf of 15 troops, including 11 Christians, one Muslim, and one Jew, according to Larsen. The officer stated that such remarks “destroy morale and unit cohesion and are in violation of the oaths we swore to support the [C]onstitution.”
“This morning our commander opened up the combat readiness status briefing by urging us to not be ‘afraid’ as to what is happening with our combat operations in Iran right now,” the NCO wrote.“ He said that ‘President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth,’” the NCO continued. “He had a big grin on his face when he said all of this which made his message seem even more crazy.”
It wouldn’t be a stretch to blame some of the blatant constitutional violations on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has repeatedly evoked God and Christian nationalism in his time fronting the Pentagon. Hegseth has parroted the views of Douglas Wilson, a conservative theologian who advocated for Christian dominance over government and society. He has followed through in practice, instating regular prayer services at America’s military headquarters. He also entered office with several Christian symbols already emblazoned on his skin—a Jerusalem cross and the phrase “Deus vult”—in what Hegseth has described as emblems of the “modern-day American Christian crusade.”
The government is now full of these weirdos in high places since this administration has chased out so many experienced military leaders.
Normally, I’d be the most afraid of the Buck Turgidson types getting excited. But I think these people might just be more dangerous.
Tillis to Noem: "A 14 month old dog is basically a teenager in dog years. You decided to kill that dog because you hadn't invested the appropriate time and training, and then you have the audacity to go into a book and say it's a leadership lesson about tough choices! … Those… pic.twitter.com/NxqajEZdQl
“A 14 month old dog is basically a teenager in dog years. You decided to kill that dog because you hadn’t invested the appropriate time and training, and then you have the audacity to go into a book and say it’s a leadership lesson about tough choices! … Those are bad decisions made in the heat of the moment, not unlike what happened in Minneapolis.”
Ouch. That was a deep cut. And a well deserved one.
WELCH: Mr. Yoho is also the husband of your former spokesperson, Tricia McLaughlin?
NOEM: Yes
WELCH: So your former assistant and her husband are the ones that got the DHS no bid contract for $143m. Any dispute about that?
after absolutely eviscerating Kristi Noem and calling for her resignation, Tillis is applauded. He thens threatens to hold up nominees if she doesn't stop stonewalling him. My God. pic.twitter.com/k2EFbmtoik
The whole hearing with Noem today was brutal. I think she is a dead puppy walking. At some point Trump’s going to have to sacrifice someone and she’s the most likely choice. Her failure is monumental.
“I’ve got serious doubts about what we are doing…”@megynkelly on why she's skeptical and concerned about Trump's Iran war in collaboration with Israel.
— The Megyn Kelly Show (@MegynKellyShow) March 2, 2026
Appearing on Kelly’s show, former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene suggested Trump has gone insane—adding that Trump’s oft-repeated statement about not knowing if he’ll get into heaven raises questions about his state of mind and competency.
“We need to have a serious conversation about what the fuck is happening to this country, and who in the hell are these decisions being made for, and who is making these decisions,” Greene said.
BANNON: A new NYT poll is brutal. Only 40% of Rs support this. Just 21% of Americans overall. Lincoln said with public opinion behind you, you can accomplish anything. Does the president need to clearly define the objectives and what Americans are being asked to sacrifice?… https://t.co/Fg5p3CM8Jrpic.twitter.com/HCsygnomuu
“I think that MAGA is Trump — MAGA’s not the other two,” Trump said, adding of Kelly specifically that “she was critical of me for years and I didn’t lose. I won all three times by a lot.”
“MAGA wants to see our country thrive and be safe,” he continued. “And MAGA loves what I’m doing — every aspect of it. … This is a detour that we have to take in order to keep our country safe and keep other countries safe, frankly.”
Most Republicans are instinctive warmongers and will back him. But after a decade of pretending to be peaceniks, some of the MAGA true believers are having some cognitive dissonance. And that hurts their little brains. It will be interesting to see how this develops.
Donald Trump’s national security strategy, which was given the moniker the “Donroe Doctrine,” was supposed to be the new blueprint for America’s role in the world. Actions such as Trump renaming the Gulf of Mexico, trying to take over or buy Greenland, threatening Canada and Panama, as well as his military incursion into Venezuela all fall into his updated version of the Monroe Doctrine, which his administration views as stating America’s divine right to rule the Western hemisphere. When considering his outright hostility toward our traditional allies in Europe and Asia, which he is apparently happy to leave to Russia and China, Trump’s vaunted America First movement becomes more sharply defined as a focus on the United States’ own neighborhood and a retreat from larger global concerns.
But as is so often true with the president’s policies, that awful vision has proved too incoherent to be an actual blueprint. Trump is just as invested in the Middle East as any president before him, a fact he proved by launching air strikes on Iran on Saturday for reasons that change from day to day. The Islamic Republic is far from the Western hemisphere, so whatever the Donroe Doctrine is in practice goes beyond a mere desire to withdraw the United States from global commitments outside of its own region. Something else is at play.
Trump has now used the U.S. military twice since the first of the year — a mere 59 days — to topple heads of state. In early January, he staged a successful military incursion into Venezuela and abducted the country’s president, Nicolás Maduro, and first lady to bring them back to the U.S. to stand trial. Most observers assumed that America had deposed Maduro as a means of toppling Venezuela’s corrupt government and paving the way for elections and a restoration of democracy. There was even a shadow government waiting in the wings that had been legitimately elected two years before. Led by opposition figure Maria Corina Machado, who won the Nobel Peace Prize for her activism, it was ready to take the helm.
But no: Trump had apparently made a deal with what remained of the Maduro regime. He would leave them in power to do as they wished in exchange for opening up Venezuela’s oil fields to American companies. Since America’s incursion, Trump has shown no interest in the democratization of the country or accountability for anyone but the former president. What will happen to Venezuela is anyone’s guess. But it appears that as long as they agree to hand over billions in oil revenue to the U.S. under threat of military action, they will have a free hand.
Then there is Iran. This past weekend, the United States, in partnership with Israel, bombed the Islamic Republic for the second time in less than a year. In June 2025, the U.S. military deployed its most powerful non-nuclear weapon to destroy underground bunkers used by the Iranian government to house their nuclear program. At the time Trump said the facilities had been completely obliterated, but no proof was ever offered of that claim. Now he and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are bombing the country again, ostensibly because they still need to destroy Iran’s nuclear program. Or is it that they want to help the protesters? Or do they want regime change? The answer keeps changing.
The administration didn’t bother with the usual constitutional and statutory niceties, and as Salon’s Sophia Tesfaye explained, Trump has felt little need to explain his actions to the American people. He believes he has an unfettered right to use American power, whether economic or military, at his total discretion without any consultation or approval from Congress. The administration had been having talks with the Iranian government which, by all accounts, had agreed to nearly all their demands, but Trump decided to bomb anyway, proving that he had always intended to do it and the talks were just a delaying tactic. (On Sunday, the president told The Atlantic in a short interview that he had agreed to keep talking, even as the air strikes continue.)
As with Venezuela, the initial round of attacks on Iran successfully decapitated the government, killing Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, and many of his top lieutenants. But the Islamic Republic is a very different country than Venezuela, a full-blown authoritarian theocracy with a large and powerful military and plenty of high-tech armaments. With a population of 90 million, it is roughly three times larger than Iraq, and although the country is in bad economic straits, it is divided politically. There is a large anti-government resistance, but it is reportedly mostly unorganized, and the heavily-armed Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, which has tentacles extending deep into the country’s economic and industrial sectors, has shown no signs of splintering.
Nonetheless, Trump seems to think — likely at the behest of Netanyahu and people like Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., an Iran hawk — that the country is so weak that the Revolutionary Guard will lay down their arms under his threats and agree to make one of his hallowed deals. Trump told the New York Times on Sunday night that despite his paeans to the Iranian protesters, he really has no problem with the regime staying in place. He said, “What we did in Venezuela, I think, is the perfect, the perfect scenario.” I’ll bet that comes as a surprise to Netanyahu.
Meanwhile, Vivian Salama at the Atlantic reported that the administration is so excited about their military “victories” that Cuba is next on the list. One official told Salama, “the president is feeling like, ‘I’m on a roll’; like, ‘This is working.’” One important goal of the Venezuelan operation was to halt oil shipments to Cuba, which has had the effect of leading the island’s economy closer to collapse. The Cuban people are suffering greatly, which seems to be part of the plan.
Trump is very excited at the prospect of a “friendly takeover” and has talked about the fact that Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been in talks to “make a deal.” There’s no word on what that deal might be, whether he’s thinking of making them a colony with Rubio as its viceroy, or simply turning it over to Florida Republicans to do with as they please.
Salama reported that the president “sees himself as the first modern American leader with the guts to complete what others only flirted with: map-changing transformations across the world.” But if you look at the countries he’s chosen to target with military action so far, what you really see is that these are all countries that have defied U.S. power in one respect or another — and he’s decided to teach them a lesson.
What is happening is basically a gang war. Trump is taking over other gangsters’ turf and taking out their leaders. There’s no need to completely change their crews. After all, they’re in the same business. It just means that they now need to report to him — while showing loyalty and ensuring protection.
If you think that’s far-fetched, consider what Trump told ABC News’ Jonathan Karl when the reporter asked him about Khamenei’s death. “I got him before he got me,” he said. “They tried twice. Well I got him first.”
There’s no “Donroe Doctrine” or some great global imperial strategy. Donald Trump is simply a mob boss who thinks he’s settling all the family business.
