Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

Dim Bulb

by digby

You can’t make this stuff up:

How many members of Congress does it take to change a light bulb? Americans may soon find out, courtesy of a contrarian piece of legislation introduced this month by Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota.

Titled the “Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act,” the bill seeks to repeal the nationwide phase-out of conventional light bulbs, the kind that have been used for more than a century — pretty much since the invention of the incandescent light bulb.

Bachmann, a first-term Republican, is challenging the nation’s embrace of energy-efficient compact fluorescent lights, saying the government has no business telling consumers what kind of light bulbs they can buy.

“This is an issue of science over fads and fashions,” Bachmann said in an interview Tuesday.

.

2 Things To Remember

by tristero

Even though the great Nate Silver projects 347 electoral votes for Obama versus 191 for Bush/Palin -I’m sorry, I meant McCain/Palin, an honest slip – there is no reason to celebrate yet.

1. The lead is narrowing. Poll-freaks will tell you that this is normal as the election grinds into its final weeks. I say poppycock. Especially after the last debate, this election should be a rout. I see no reason to deem a “normal” tightening of the race as “acceptable.” It is not. Admittedly, Nate’s latest posted analysis of the slip in the polls for Obama provides reason for my left brain not to be concerned, my right brain is starting to worry.

2. Even if you believe that 1, above, is silly, unsophisticated, and unrealistic – a not unreasonable position, says my left brain – I hope you will agree with this: It is not enough for Obama to win. Republicans must lose. Big time. The more the merrier.

Therefore, it is important that we do what we can, donate (through progressive groups) to Obama and other worthy candidates, participate in GOTV efforts and, of course, vote ourselves. As previous races have demonstrated all too clearly, Democrats are extremely gifted at wresting defeat from the jaws of victory. This time, let us take nothing at all for granted.

For my money, Obama has not won until he is sworn in and Bush has boarded the plane for his trophy ranch and sea-ment pond in Crawford.

Inflationary Numbers

by digby

Man, that ACORN sure is despicable with it’s underhanded registration practices. Something should be done about it:

Dozens of newly minted Republican voters say they were duped into joining the party by a GOP contractor with a trail of fraud complaints stretching across the country.

Voters contacted by The Times said they were tricked into switching parties while signing what they believed were petitions for tougher penalties against child molesters. Some said they were told that they had to become Republicans to sign the petition, contrary to California initiative law. Others had no idea their registration was being changed.

“I am not a Republican,” insisted Karen Ashcraft, 47, a pet-clinic manager and former Democrat from Ventura who said she was duped by a signature gatherer into joining the GOP. “I certainly . . . won’t sign anything in front of a grocery store ever again.”

It is a bait-and-switch scheme familiar to election experts. The firm hired by the California Republican Party — a small company called Young Political Majors, or YPM, which operates in several states — has been accused of using the tactic across the country.

Election officials and lawmakers have launched investigations into the activities of YPM workers in Florida and Massachusetts. In Arizona, the firm was recently a defendant in a civil rights lawsuit. Prosecutors in Los Angeles and Ventura counties say they are investigating complaints about the company.

The firm, which a Republican Party spokesman said is paid $7 to $12 for each registration it secures, has denied any wrongdoing and says it has never been charged with a crime.

The 70,000 voters YPM has registered for the Republican Party this year will help combat the public perception that it is struggling amid Democratic gains nationally, give a boost to fundraising efforts and bolster member support for party leaders, political strategists from both parties say.

Those who were formerly Democrats may stop receiving phone calls and literature from that party, perhaps affecting its get-out-the-vote efforts. They also will be given only a Republican ballot in the next primary election if they do not switch their registration back before then.

Some also report having their registration status changed to absentee without their permission; if they show up at the polls without a ballot they may be unable to vote.

Golly, I’d bet if they look into it further they’ll find out that in spite of what we’ve been told, it was the Republicans who were responsible for the housing meltdown too. Shocking stuff.

But here’s the kicker:

Some also report having their registration status changed to absentee without their permission; if they show up at the polls without a ballot they may be unable to vote.

Oddly enough this happened to me in 2006. I did not request an absentee ballot and I didn’t turn one in. But they had me down as an absentee voter and I had to cast a provisional ballot. It’s a hassle to do it and if people are in a hurry, they may not bother. They told me to call back in a month to find out if my vote counted. I did and they didn’t know what I was talking about.

I have no idea how it happened. In my case it was probably some kind of computer glitch because I certainly didn’t change my registration or fill out any paperwork. But it was something of a shock and made me wonder if someone wasn’t playing around with my registration.

The good news is that if it happens, you can vote provisionally. But it’s the kind of this that’s designed to screw up the process and make people think twice about whether or not it’s worth it.


Update:
FDL had more earlier this week on similar GOP shennanigans in California.

.

Hack For Hack

by digby

One of the most sickening things we have had to endure during this election season has been the sight of Wolf Blitzer sitting across a desk from Glenn Beck and “interviewing” him as if he weren’t a cretinous, mouth-breathing, talk radio hack. So, it’s good news that Beck is leaving for the far more lucrative wingnut welfare ghetto at Fox, where he belongs.

Sadly, CNN has decided it’s a good time to elevate the unctuous blowhard William Bennett and they’ve given him a truly terrible show laughably called “Beyond The Politics.” Check this out:

BENNETT: Once again, I’m joined by four exceptional thinkers from very different fields. Bill Galston is with the Brookings Institution, Tara Wall with “The Washington Times”, Cornel West, professor at Princeton University, and Andrew McCarthy with “The National Review”. [West is the only liberal of the bunch.]

This week, a federal judge ordered the release of 17 Chinese Muslims held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Why do I bring that up? “The New York Times” headline said, “In Blow to President, Judge Orders 17 Detainees at Guantanamo Freed.”

On Wednesday, a federal appeals court halted that plan for at least a week. Were we conveying more rights to alleged terrorists while government is growing? And while it’s growing, does it lose focus? This is one of the things we conservatives worry about that we say we like limited government, the government that does a few things and a few things well. As we’re seeing the expansion of this government, we’re wondering about whether government’s doing its first job.

MCCARTHY: And we’re also seeing that when you allow your national security issues to be delegated to courts, which is a vast departure from our founding idea, which is that national security decisions are the most decisions made by a political community, they’re made to be made by the political branches, not by the courts, this is what you see when you have your most unaccountable officials making these very important decisions.

And it actually seamlessly, I think, fits into a lot of our other discussion because here you have government colliding with itself to fairly well. We have a treaty that says that you can’t send people back to a country where you have reason to believe that they’ll be persecuted, which is why we can’t send these – repatriate these guys back to China.

We have two statutes that say if you have received paramilitary training, or you have been involved in the promotion of terrorism, which there is indication that these guys have, the government says they’re a threat to the Chinese, not to us. But under our law, they shouldn’t be allowed to be brought into the United States. It’s actually a violation of congressional statutes. And you have a federal judge who thinks he’s not limited by any law whatsoever. So you have all these things combining in a perfect storm. And what it means to the American people is less security.

[…]

WEST: But I think we can’t deny, though, that as we approach the end of the age of Reagan, the end of conservative rule, in addition to the economic catastrophe, you’ve got…

BENNETT: You’re sure it’s over?

WEST: I think it’s – I think we’re reaching an end. I mean, I think it’s a good thing, but we’re reaching the end.

BENNETT: Well…

WEST: But let’s be honest about it. I mean, we know torture is a mark of uncivilized behavior. Any country associated with torture will have their image besmirched around the world. That’s part of our challenge, too.

In addition to that, we had Katrina. So you got these three pillars, as it were. So that when we’re talking about strong government, tapping people’s phones, strong government, promoting torture under some kind of other language, this is something that can never be morally justified.

BENNETT: Was there torture at Guantanamo?

WALL: Yes, I mean…

WEST: From what the evidence…

WALL: There’s – what evidence? There’s no…

WEST: There’s no evidence, no torture has ever taken place whatsoever?

BENNETT: Guantanamo?

WEST: Is there any evidence, any torture taken place in the last ten years by American authority?

MCCARTHY: What are you talking – what do you mean by torture? I mean, are you talking about water boarding? We’ve water boarded three guys so far as we know.

WALL: I also think the…

MCCARTHY: I don’t think it’s trivial at all.

WALL: (INAUDIBLE) water board these detainees.

WEST: Torture is taking place.

WALL: …is astonishing, the liberties we afford these detainees. We had…

WEST: With no…

WALL: We had…

WEST: No habeas corpus.

WALL: We had…

MCCARTHY: Do you want no intelligence?

WALL: Our board actually had some of these military experts, our editorial board had some of these military experts and that – that oversee these military courts and the due process. And it is astonishing to hear the liberties that are afforded to these.

I mean, they get more liberties quite frankly than American citizens who are represented. And in fact, when what has happened with the Supreme Court, I think not only does it put in balance or it weakens our own security as a nation…

BENNETT: Right.

WALL: …I think it sends a message to terrorists, particularly in a time – and Homeland Security experts will tell you, particularly — this is a time that these terrorists, al Qaeda, and others, are paying very close attention to what is happening during the election.

It goes on like this for quite some time, with Cornell West ever more incredulous as these people look him square in the eye and contend that the sun rises in the west and sets in the east. There is no torture. In fact, these detainees have been treated like kings! Better than American citizens!

William Bennett is a conservative operative, no different than Glenn Beck. And CNN has given him his own show from which to launch and validate right wing talking points. Fox doesn’t do this. There are no equivalent shows on their network. They have no Joe Scarboroughs or Bill Bennetts.

So, while I celebrate the departure of Beck from CNN, it’s pretty clear that CNN is still angling for their fair and balanced share of that mean, older, conservative male audience that everyone values so highly. Bennett ought to fill Beck’s shoes quite nicely.

.

The Shame Of Johnstown

by dday

As we head into the home stretch of the election, the disturbing examples of racism has risen. But for me, this one is personal:

My mother is from Johnstown. My grandmother and my aunt still live there. I spent many weeks and months there as a kid. The people in this video are people with whom I have probably eaten in the same restaurants, shopped in the same stores, walked down the same streets. They are working people who haven’t had much economic opportunity in their Western Pennsylvania steel town in their lives. To see the racism somewhere that you have spent time is much more impactful. I always knew it was in the background, and I must admit that I’ve seen it at times in my own family. But a video like this with its countless examples is depressing.

I’m not concerned about Pennsylvania – the leaps forward in voter registration will make a difference. And both of my Pennsylvania resident grandmothers are voting for Obama. Neither were on board but I managed to convince them. But as we’ve been saying here for a while, the election is merely a part of the fight – then there’s governing. And the poison that has been injected into the discourse is going to be a strong deterrent.

But of course, it’s no different than the demonization of liberals and Democrats that has been a hallmark of the Republican noise machine for decades. One of the best ways to combat this is to reveal it – to create moments of recognition, moments of shame, moments of revulsion. Johnstown needs to know about Johnstown.

…I should add that this doesn’t appear to be the prevailing opinion.

.

Tell Them To Mind Their Own Business

by digby

It looks like the amendment to ban gay marriage in California is going to be a squeaker, unfortunately. And since Obama is way ahead here, it may be that we don’t get the turnout that’s needed. (That youthquake needs to be a 9.0.)

So, there are a few things to be done in these last two weeks if you care about civil rights and think it’s outrageous that anyone believes they have the right to interfere in the marital arrangements of other consenting adults.

1) They need money. You can donate here.

2) If you live in California, volunteer. The Mormons have decided to make this their pet project and have flooded the Yes campaign with money and volunteers. The no campaign needs help.

Here are some links:

Campaign’s latest ad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHeTVAE4ZkY

Hello, I’m No On Prop 8 (great Mac ad spoof): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9T7ux8M4Go

Volunteer to Make History http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxHWB6eZ2JY

Ellen Urges Californians to Vote No on Prop. 8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd_ai2LrgJ0

Logos, buttons, graphics: http://www.noonprop8.com/action/downloads

In this historic year it would be a shame if California couldn’t muster the votes to knock down yet another barrier to civil rights.

.

¡Perfora, bebé, perfora!

by tristero

Now, here’s a game changer:

If confirmed, it puts Cuba’s [oil] reserves on par with those of the US and into the world’s top 20. Drilling is expected to start next year by Cuba’s state oil company Cubapetroleo, or Cupet.

“It would change their whole equation. The government would have more money and no longer be dependent on foreign oil,” said Kirby Jones, founder of the Washington-based US-Cuba Trade Association. “It could join the club of oil exporting nations.”

“We have more data. I’m almost certain that if they ask for all the data we have, (their estimate) is going to grow considerably,” said Cupet’s exploration manager, Rafael Tenreyro Perez.

Havana based its dramatically higher estimate mainly on comparisons with oil output from similar geological structures off the coasts of Mexico and the US. Cuba’s undersea geology was “very similar” to Mexico’s giant Cantarell oil field in the Bay of Campeche, said Tenreyro.

PS If I got the Spanish wrong in the title, please correct me. UPDATE: Title corrected. Gracias, Plucky Underdog.

h/t, Atrios.

UPDATE: Special note to rightwingers, Republicans, and others plagued with severe cognitive distortions or poor English: This post is not “pro-Castro.” I’m a longtime critic of The Beard. Being opposed to Castro doesn’t mean I support the current US policy, of course, which I don’t.

Meet America’s Deciders: The Undecideds

by tristero