Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

First they came for the socialists, etc.

Florida lives down to its image

It was a tad disorienting the first time I entered a public men’s room in Europe and there was a woman attendant standing inside keeping the place clean and neat. But what the hell. When in Rome, right? (Was it Rome?) So it’s hard to understand the parochial freakout on the American right over trans people using bathrooms. Well, not that hard. They react to anyone outside their black-and-white categories as they might at encountering a snake or a spider the size of a Buick. With a visceral shudder.

Count on Florida to model how to overreact for the rest of MAGAstan (Washington Post):

Florida’s legislature Wednesday passed a bill that bans transgender people from using many bathrooms and changing areas that match their gender identity, on penalty of criminal trespass charges, in the latest spate of anti-LGBTQ legislation that has been taken up by state lawmakers.

A small number of Republicans joined their Democratic colleagues in opposing House Bill 1521, which applies to schools, government buildings, prisons and detention centers. It now heads to the desk of Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), who is expected to sign it into law. DeSantis — who has privately indicated that he intends to seek the 2024 GOP presidential nomination — has tacked to the hard right on social issues such as abortion, as he courts primary voters by showing off his conservative vision for the state and pitches Florida as a “blueprint” for the rest of the country.

DeSantis means to prove to the rest of the country that he is what his state looks like on a map.

The legislation is “part of a pernicious, degrading, and systematic attempt to dehumanize one of our most marginalized communities,” said Human Rights Watch.

Under HB 1521, “specified persons who enter certain restrooms or changing facilities and refuse to depart when asked to do so commit the criminal offense of trespass.” Unisex restrooms and changing facilities are exempt. But those attendants in Europe would find no work in Florida.

And enforcement?

The nine GOP legislators who wrote the initial draft of the bill did not respond to requests for comment overnight Wednesday. In the draft legislation, they write that they aim to “maintain public safety, decency, decorum, and privacy.” Researchers have noted that trans women are much more likely than their cisgender counterparts to be victims of violence.

It is not clear how such a law — which defines sex using characteristics such as “chromosomes, naturally occurring sex hormones, and internal and external genitalia present at birth” — would be enforced. Kaleb Hobson-Garcia, a transgender man, said at a hearing that despite his beard and deep voice, the bill would require him to use the women’s restroom, potentially alarming those around him and putting him in danger.

Kansas, Arkansas, Iowa, and more states are on the stomp-a-trans bandwagon, the Post reports. North Carolina’s infamous 2016 “bathroom bill” cost the state about $3.7 billion in bocotts, etc. before its more-or-less repeal.

Upholding HB 1521 will be a challenge in courts where equal protection still means anything.

And good luck enforcing this:

Twitter user Erin Reed tweets, “This is one of the most terrifying bills in America. It will cause violent confrontations. Its enforcement mechanism is essentially, ‘cis people can demand trans people subjugate themselves to their request to leave a bathroom.’ ”

Reed adds, “Connecting flight in Florida? Convention? On Vacation? Visiting family?”

Jeff Sharlet (The Undertow: Scenes from a Slow Civil War) reacts, “Read the bill. It’s even worse than Erin says. Read this and @ me — please — with your ‘explanation’ of why this isn’t ‘fascism.’ Tell me which side you’re on.” He adds, “Yes. Folks saying ‘courts will overturn’ might as well say ‘the center will hold.’ It won’t, because it hasn’t. We’re past that now.”

First they came for the socialists,” etc.

The internet has freed many of our most marginalized groups to emerge from the shadows where our most reactionary neighbors wish they would remain. Myself, I get L, G, and B. I have friends. I still have trouble wrapping my brain around T. But that’s because I’ve met few of the people Florida and other red-state legislatures are rushing to criminalize. But I don’t have to to believe it’s none of my business in the United States of America to legally stomp them like spiders.

But then, some of us think it’s OK to choke the life out of someone in mental distress, too.

https://twitter.com/rafaelshimunov/status/1653729266758983680?s=20

All the presidents women

Charlie Sykes had a good column today about the astonishing fact that the GOP front runner is on trail for rape and there is a legion of other women who have credibly accused him of assault:

By the latest count, 26 (!) women have accused Trump of sexual assault or misconduct. Here’s the full list.

[…]

Now we hear that Trump plans to skip the Carroll trial, passing up a chance to testify, or to deny the charges under oath.

When prompted by Kaplan, Tacopina confirmed his client would not appear.

“So Mr. Trump will not be coming?” Kaplan asked.

“That’s right, your honor,” Tacopina replied.

Let’s try to put this into some context:

It is hard impossible to imagine that someone with more than two dozen accusations of sexual assault would be able to survive in any other realm of American society: business, entertainment, sports, the military, even politics.

We save our lowest standards for the presidency.

As we now know, the charges of assault — and rape — are not disqualifying for the GOP; since the release of the Access Hollywood tape, the charges have barely been a factor. Now, they hardly even register.

In the right-wing media, the women have been thoroughly memory-holed. Philip Bump notes:

When Carroll’s allegation first emerged in June 2019, CNN mentioned it on-air more than 130 times…. MSNBC mentioned it more than 110 times. Fox News mentioned it less than 10 times.

This year, the pattern has been similar. CNN has mentioned Carroll more than 230 times and MSNBC more than 440. Fox News has mentioned her seven times.

Seven times.

But, to be fair, it’s not just Fox News. Out of the hundreds (thousands?) of articles written about Donald Trump in the last two years, how many have mentioned the women?

Imagine writing a story about Harvey Weinstein . . . without once mentioning the #MeToo allegations. And yet, when is the last time Trump was even asked about the allegations? Outside of the E. Jean Carroll trial, how many news stories about his surging presidential campaign even mention them?

Will Trump even be asked about it at next week’s CNN’s townhall?

What’s the over/under on the number of women whose names will even be uttered? (My guess is one, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s zero.)

I can’t imagine CNN r=bringing it up. And the Republicans voters at the townhall are unlikely to do it either. Nobody cares about this, not really. It’s baked into Trump’s reputation and I suspect many of his voters like it about him.

The NY Post incites violence against the mentally ill

He killed that man.

This is the sort of rhetoric I see on Next Door frequently. But I haven’t seen anyone suggest that the mentally ill should be ground up as dog food. Yet.

It doesn’t sound like the man was threatening anyone.

The 24-year-old passenger stepped in after the vagrant, identified by sources as Jordan Neely, 30, began going on an aggressive rant on a northbound F train Monday afternoon, according to police and a witness who took the video.

“He starts to make a speech,” freelance journalist Juan Alberto Vazquez said in Spanish during an interview Tuesday, referring to the disturbed man.

“He started screaming in an aggressive manner,” Vazquez told The Post. “He said he had no food, he had no drink, that he was tired and doesn’t care if he goes to jail. He started screaming all these things, took off his jacket, a black jacket that he had, and threw it on the ground.”

That’s when he said the straphanger came up behind Neely and took him to the ground in a chokehold — keeping him there for some 15 minutes, Vazquez said.

The approximately three-minute-and-a-half-long video shot by Vazquez shows the blond subway rider lying on the floor of the train with his arm wrapped around the man’s neck.

Neely — who was living on the streets and had a history of mental health issues — lost consciousness after being put in the chokehold, and EMS workers at the station were unable to revive him, police and law enforcement sources said.

The straphanger — who sources said is a Marine veteran — was taken into custody and later released without charges.

Is this what we’re doing now? We’re just letting people kill others if they are making a scene in public? Really????

“The debt ceiling is sacred” — Donald Trump

Memories…

President Donald Trump on Friday extolled the debt ceiling as “a sacred element of our country” that should never be wielded as a bargaining chip in budget talks — despite urging Republican lawmakers to do just that 6½ years ago.

“That’s a very, very sacred thing in our country, debt ceiling. We can never play with it. So I would have to assume we’re in great shape,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

The president’s remarks come as White House officials, led by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, home in on a two-year budget agreement with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) that would raise the national debt limit.

“When I first came into office,” Trump said, “I asked about the debt ceiling. … And I said, I remember to Sen. Schumer and to Nancy Pelosi, ‘Would anybody ever use that to negotiate with?’ They said, ‘Absolutely not.’”

The president added: “That’s a sacred element of our country. They can’t use the debt ceiling to negotiate.”

But as a private citizen in December 2012, Trump tweeted that “the Republicans must use the debt ceiling as leverage to make a good deal!”

That social media directive from the future commander in chief came amid the Obama administration’s legislative battles over the U.S. fiscal cliff with then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and former House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio).

“I can’t imagine anybody ever even thinking of using the debt ceiling as a negotiating wedge,” Trump said Friday.

The Democrats should take out ads all over the country with that footage.

A former FBI agent turned insurrectionist arrested

This one is a long time right wing operative as well:

Federal prosecutors have charged a former F.B.I. agent with illegally entering the Capitol during the Jan. 6 riot and said he had called police officers Nazis as he encouraged a mob of Trump loyalists to kill them.

The former agent, Jared L. Wise, was arrested on Monday and faces four misdemeanor counts, including disrupting the orderly conduct of government and trespassing, after agents received a tip in January 2022 that he had been inside the Capitol, according to a criminal complaint.

Mr. Wise, 50, told the police they were like the Gestapo, Nazi Germany’s feared secret police, the complaint said. When violence erupted, he shouted in the direction of rioters attacking the law enforcement officers, “Kill ’em! Kill ’em! Kill ’em!”

Mr. Wise raised his arms in celebration after breaching the Capitol in a face mask, and he escaped through a window, the complaint added.

He seems nice. This is an interesting trajectory. I have to wonder how many people like him opted to stay in the FBI. More than we think, I’d guess.

From 2004 to 2017, Mr. Wise worked on counterterrorism matters at the F.B.I. in the New York field office. He was briefly detailed to Libya to help agents investigate the terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012, that killed four Americans. Mr. Wise left the bureau after his supervisors became unhappy with his work, and his career had stalled, a former senior F.B.I. official said.

Mr. Wise later joined the conservative group Project Veritas under the supervision of a former British spy, Richard Seddon, who had been recruited by the security contractor Erik Prince to train operatives to infiltrate trade unions, Democratic congressional campaigns and other targets.

At Project Veritas, according to a former employee with direct knowledge of his employment, Mr. Wise used the code name Bendghazi and trained at the Prince family ranch in Wyoming with other recruits. Mr. Wise took part in an operation against a teachers’ union and apparently left Project Veritas in mid-2018, the former employee said.

I guess I’ve been out of it but I didn’t realize that Project Veritas and Erik Prince had joined forces to train infiltrators. Is there any toxic operation in right wing politics that Prince isn’t involved in?

This is one of the people Trump celebrates at his rallies and promises to pardon. And Republican voters are fine with it. Many see it as one of their primary reasons for voting for him.

Is there such a thing as Trump fatigue?

Maybe. Among a very few GOPers. But that could make a difference in the general election.

The front runner for the 2024 Republican nomination for president, former president Donald J. Trump, is currently on trial in civil court in New York for rape (rape!) and it seems that none of his potential voters care that he is jetting off to a new golf course in Scotland instead of appearing in court to defend himself. Neither do they care that he’s also been indicted on felony charges in New York City for illegally paying hush money to an adult film actress or that he and his offspring are the subject of a massive civil fraud case filed by the state Attorney General last September.

And that’s just New York.

Trump’s also got investigations pending in Georgia over election fraud and two major federal probes being handled by Special Counsel Jack Smith regarding the stealing of classified documents and criminal liability for the insurrection on January 6.

But according to a new CBS/YouGov poll, the majority of Republican voters could not care less about any of that. This new survey shows Trump is the undisputed leader of the pack, besting his closest rival Florida Governor Ron DeSantis by 36 points and it delves into why GOP primary voters feel the way they do. 94% of those declared for Trump are voting for him because of his performance as president. (Apparently, they love chaos and incompetence.) 94% believe he “fights” for people like them and 82% love the way he deals with his political opponents. 65% believe that a good reason to vote for him is as a way to show support for his legal troubles which explains why they could not care less that he’s credibly accused of numerous crimes. It’s clear at this point that Trump’s trope that he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any votes is literally true.

Meanwhile, 84% believe he can beat Biden and this is because nearly 70% believe that Biden is illegitimate and 75% see Trump’s “victory” in 2020 as a reason to vote for him again. Even worse, 61% believe that all candidates must say that Trump won. In other words, the Big Lie is a litmus test even after the 2022 election in which GOP candidates who ran on that were slaughtered at the polls.

They are feeling the exhaustion of having to keep up a false front.

If anyone thought that Trump’s celebration of the January 6 criminals might turn off GOP voters, they need to think again. Only 15% prefer a candidate who is a critic of the events that day while 24% want one who supports what they did. Most Republicans just want to sweep it under the rug and not talk about it at all and they certainly don’t seem to be holding it against Trump.

What about “the issues?” Well, here’s what GOP voters care about:

As you can see we are dealing with very serious people. Only 51% are in favor of a national abortion ban and a mere 44% believe that the government should rip up the Constitution and favor Christianity over all other religions. I guess that’s good?

CBS pointed out one interesting little finding that I suspect may have more of an effect in the general election should Trump win the nomination: Of the voters who say they aren’t going to vote for Trump, half of them name “exhaustion” as the reason why. 54% explain that he’s “too controversial” and 41% of those who won’t vote for him say it’s because of his legal woes. This doesn’t add up to a large number in the full primary pool, but it’s enough that he’s going to have to find a way to appeal to them if he hopes to beat Joe Biden. These are people who could just decide to stay home rather than vote for him again.

Perhaps that’s why he’s decided to do mainstream media outreach and has agreed to appear on CNN for the first time since 2016 for a town hall next week in New Hampshire. CNN is desperate for ratings so I would imagine they’ll be happy to let Trump and his cult followers say pretty much whatever they want which may appeal to some of the disaffected Fox viewers who’ve stopped watching in the wake of Tucker Carlson’s firing. Vanity Fair spoke with CNN political director David Chalian, who acknowledged that Trump is “unique” what with all the impeachments and crimes and coups and all, but said they plan to treat him “just like any other candidate.” Great.

Maybe someone in the audience will broach the subject of his legal woes even if CNN declines to be so rude as to mention it. If there are some Fox defectors who tune in to see their idol, they might learn something. The Washington Post’s Philip Bump took a look at the coverage he gets on these issues on the right-wing networks and it’s pretty astonishing. For instance, regarding the rape trial that’s currently unfolding in New York, “this year CNN mentioned Carroll more than 230 times and MSNBC more than 440. Fox News has mentioned her seven times.”

Or how about the Georgia election investigation:

If charges emerge in Fulton County, Ga., as seems likely, it may actually surprise the network’s audience. Since Trump was first recorded cajoling state officials to overturn the results of the 2020 election in January 2021, Fox News has mentioned the county in the context of Trump less than 100 times. CNN has mentioned it more than 800 times and MSNBC twice as often as CNN.

This pattern holds for all the Trump legal scandals. It’s no wonder that Republican voters don’t care about them. If they’re aware of them at all they think they aren’t serious or dangerous to Donald Trump.

The results of this CBS poll are a testament to Trump’s insight that constant repetition of lies, no matter how preposterous, will convince people that the truth is in the eye of the beholder. Many of his followers certainly believe every word he says but just as many know he didn’t win the election and are at least somewhat aware that he is scandal-plagued for a reason. They admire him for refusing to acknowledge the facts and have willingly joined him in bending the truth to fit their desires. It must be a powerful feeling, almost like magic, to be able to live in an alternate reality and they have Trump’s historic audacity to thank for that. They won’t give it up easily.

However, for a few, it’s wearing off and they are feeling the exhaustion of having to keep up a false front — the veil is falling from their eyes and they can no longer look away. They are a small minority of the party but there are enough of them to deny Trump a second term if they decide they just can’t do it again. Let’s hope the mainstream media doesn’t convince them that he’s really “just like any other candidate” after all.

Salon

Nasty mean girls

There is something very, very familiar about these women. I knew their type in school. Female bullies.

I’m sure they think of themselves as Christians but they’re evil, horrible people.

It wasn’t enough for Montana’s Republican-led state legislature to take away Democratic Rep. Zooey Zephyr’s seat in the legislature. Now people are taking her seat outside of the House chamber too. 

The Montana House of Representatives last week voted to censure Zephyr, Montana’s first openly transgender lawmaker. The vote came in response to Zephyr criticizing her Republican colleagues for restricting access to gender-affirming care.

Zephyr announced Monday that she is suing to reverse the restrictions placed on her. The censure prevents Zephyr from entering the House floor, so she has instead been working from a public bench outside the chamber. 

“Though they initially tried to have me removed from the public seating area, I am here working on behalf of my constituents as best I can given the undemocratic circumstances,” Zephyr tweeted on April 27. 

A few days later, a photo showed multiple snickering women sitting on the same bench, forcing Zephyr to work standing up at a nearby lunch counter. 

“Some folks showed up early this morning and sat on the public benches near the entrance to the House, so Seat 31 has moved,” Zephyr tweeted. “I’m up and ready to work. Plus, I hear stand desks are all the rage these days.”

The photo, in which the women appear to smile and laugh while leering at Zephyr, is reminiscent of photos taken during the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s that show white people mocking and harassing Black people. 

I made that observation a couple of days ago. It’s exactly the same thing. Ugly, cruel bigots enjoying their love of hate.

An island of sanity

In a sea of crazy

Like being dipped in living waters. That’s what it’s like anymore to hear an actual expert testify on Capitol Hill instead of partisan shills. Imagine hearings without grandstanding and hectoring from Republicans such as those on the Senate Judiciary Committee. “World’s greatest deliberative body,” indeed.

Roll Call:

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee spent a hearing Tuesday making the case for legislation that would put the Supreme Court under an ethics code if the justices didn’t do so themselves, but witnesses were split as to whether Congress has the power to do so.

The backers of proposed bills argued that the justices have waited for too long to impose their own ethics code, exemplified by recent reports about undisclosed luxury trips and a real estate transaction Justice Clarence Thomas received from a billionaire GOP donor.

Amanda Frost, a University of Virginia Law School professor, testified that the Constitution is silent about the internal workings of the Supreme Court and instead left it to Congress to establish the court’s size, budget and rules like a quorum.

Frost said that Congress has legislated rules for the court since the 1790s, including the oath of office justices take, and that would include an ethics code.

“To claim Congress lacks that authority is to ignore the Constitution’s text and structure,” Frost said.

I could listen to this opening statement clip from Frost all day on repeat. Sanity. Remember it?

There was, of course, pushback from the GOP:

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said creating an ethics code for the court may create a “cottage industry” of advocates filing ethics complaints in cases strategically, making it “ripe for seeding the field with politicization of the Supreme Court.”

Tillis said he could not imagine the Founding Fathers supporting such a check on the justices.

“That seems to be far afield from anything the Founding Fathers would have considered appropriate,” Tillis said.

Frost, an authority, disagrees.

That 1978’s Ethics in Government Act has spawned no “cottage industry” by litigants intent on picking off justices with whom they disagree was of no matter to Tillis. Nor to other Republicans on the committee.

Click my link, please!

The rise and fall of digital pioneers

Ben Smith is making the rounds to promote his new book, “Traffic.” The proprieter of the shuttering BuzzFeed News told MSNBC’s Alex Wagner Tuesday night he did not aniticpate, in its infancy, what digital media would do to legacy media and politics. The pursuit of clicks contained in the BuzzFeed name came to define the goal of social media.

That business model was the digital equivalent of “if it bleeds, it leads.” I recall once sitting in a packed Netroots Nation workshop on writing clickbait headlines to attract eyeballs before clickbait was a word and swiftly became a four-letter one.

Smith did not forsee in those days what the lefties’ tech tools that gave rise to Jezebel or Huffington Post would become in the hands of the radical right. I recall, too, that Right Online, the onetime conservative shadow to Netroots, was thought a joke by our younger attendees. Right Online seemed a collection or hopelessly unhip retirees in the digital age trying still learning to turn on a computer and manipulate a cursor.

That was then. Smith writes in the New York Times:

The media is still grappling with what Jezebel’s creators helped unleash, for good and ill. The era opened opportunities for journalists and creative people who, by instinct or practice, could blend their identities with the stories they told. The new generation of millennial writers at the Gawker sites, BuzzFeed, Vice and other digital projects challenged stuffy, insular and occasionally deceitful institutions that deserved challenging, but it also lacked, in retrospect, a sense of the value of having trusted institutions at all.

And those of us who came up in the internet media may have missed the biggest story of all. We took it for granted that this was a progressive medium, populated by young people who loved Barack Obama and culminating in some way in his election in 2008. We didn’t expect the true apogee of the new media to come with the election of Donald Trump eight years later.

Nathan Heller of The New Yorker recalls encountering Jonah Peretti, one of Huffington Post’s creators, and having the same unsettling feeling I had in that Netroots workshop:

I was a junior employee at a Web magazine at that point, and I recall being summoned one morning to an editorial meeting where Peretti was to be our guest. Peretti, a tall, moist-haired young man, gave a spiel about optimizing pages for “viral lift,” about trying many different wordings and running with whatever drove traffic the most. I remember having the powerful feeling that this was not what I’d got into the writing business to do. But I also remember that, after his visit, many things at our magazine changed. Keywords now had to be packaged with articles. Hyperlinking became antic, and headlines, the clever composition of which had been an intramural sport among editors (a storied favorite, for a dispatch from the Michael Jackson trial: “He Never Laid a Glove on Me!”), became things like “The Haunting, Unexpected Revelations from the Third Day of the Michael Jackson Trial (Video).” For a while, this Perettian tinkering was our special knowledge, our competitive advantage. Then it was everywhere.

I’ve seen the same phenomenon over and over: activists trying to make their passions pay the rent. Capitalism is a cruel mistress.

Heller observes:

Perhaps the keenest insight in this book concerns the way that traffic-chasing helped create the MAGA right. In Smith’s telling, it is not coincidental that Andrew Breitbart spent three months working with Peretti at the Huffington Post, a publication that, in 2008, got behind Barack Obama rather than Hillary Clinton partly because Peretti had identified Obama as a traffic booster. The extraordinary digital success that Obama’s campaign went on to enjoy, Smith suggests, rose in part from “the new way of thinking about people that came when you saw them as traffic—measuring interest and intent, and channeling it into action.” Or, to put it more directly, traffic wasn’t just business; it was politics.

See what politics has become. The Greenes and the Jordans and the Boeberts arrive on Capitol Hill not to govern but to generate clicks, to go viral and become right-wing media celebrities. Clicks equal dollars and fame.

Sometimes small is beautiful. It’s an irony that smallish sites such as Hullabaloo have endured while big ones fueled by venture capitalists fail. Also ironic is the level of hucksterism spawned when chasing clicks and advertising dollars supercedes chasing truth, justice, and the American Way, etc.

And here we are.

Trump opens a new golf course in a foreign country

While he’s running for president

It appears that they also tried to recreate the fiction that Scotland is thrilled to have Trump visiting. He said “It’s good to be home” when he arrived which is a very weird thing to say when you’re running for president of the United States. But whatever. The fact that he’s still doing business abroad and has no plans to divest if he were to win another term gets no coverage in the media. It’s just a given that he’ll run his business from the White House as he did before.

This is just sad:

He’s going to Ireland next. I think he’s expecting a big welcome like Biden received when he was there a couple of weeks ago. Not gonna happen. This pathetic little display is about the best he can hope for.