Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

Democrats are from Earth, Republicans are from Pluto

by digby

Delay just said that the Democrats are drunk with power. I’m not kidding.

It’s a common delusion among Plutonians. Here’s Hindquarters:

By “the left” I’m including almost the entire Democratic Party, you can count the exceptions on your fingers, you can name them, Zell Miller, Joe Lieberman…The whole mainstream of the party is engaged in an effort that is a betrayal of America, what they care about is not winning the war on terror…I don’t think they care about the danger to us as Americans or the danger to people in other countries. They care about power.

Unfortunately, I’m having a hard time understand what Matthews is saying today his mouth is so full. I’m pretty sure he just spent five minutes talking about how Tom is a caring foster dad.

.

Reverend Tom: Scourge Of The Termites, Saviour Of The Right

by tristero

At the time I wrote my post suggesting, among other things that it would be better to concentrate on cleaning up the messes DeLay created than on whatever punishment DeLay will receive for the myriad offenses he’s committed, I was unaware of the interview with TIME that DeLay gave and which Digby quotes. My bad. I should have realized from the getgo what the future will likely hold for Tom DeLay.

There is so much money to be had in the rightwing christianist racket, and so much potential for power trips and money scams that it would be a miracle – a genuine miracle – if DeLay doesn’t reinvent himself as the Second Coming of Chuck Colson. What to do? I suspect there is probably a legal way to keep DeLay’s paws out of politics but to ban him from religious work that just maybe have an intersection with American politics – now that’s gonna be hard.

Reverend Tom…a nauseating thought because it’s so plausible as to be very likely.

One thing to do is to make sure that his crimes – and their consequences – are made abundantly, publicly clear, so that whenever Reverend Tom claims he’s been washed pure in the Blood of the Lamb, people will remember that the blot on his character is stained deep.

So I apologize for so much as suggesting DeLay can be safely ignored merely because his congressional career is over. He can’t and he shouldn’t be.

Voices From The front

by digby

I highly recommend this series in the LA Times about wounded military in Iraq and Afghanistan. (There are some very graphic pictures, so don’t look if you have a weak stomach. It’s the real face of the war in all its bloody horror.)

It’s quite a tribute to these soldiers’ courage and the miracle of modern medicine. There have been more than 17,000 wounded in Iraq thus far, an average of 110 per week. In past wars a vast number of them would have died. Today, with great battlefield medicine and immediate transport to Europe and the States, most of them pull through. But their wounds are grievous and their lives will never be the same. The primary means of wounding them isn’t bullets — it’s explosive devices.

These people have made a great sacrifice for a cynical, political purpose and it makes me furious. It’s not the first time this has happened in history, but it damned well ought to be the last time the US ever does it.

.

Iraq: UPI Says It’s A Civil War

by tristero

Seems a reasonable conclusion to me. What makes naming it so important is that it would help articulate what an approriate US and international policy should be towards Iraq.

Please note: “would help.” That assumes a competent US administration, or even merely an administration with a toehold on reality. Since we have neither, whether we call the situation in Iraq a Civil War or just the absolute, tragically worst of the many fuckups that Bush directly created doesn’t seem to make much difference right now. Nothing rational will get through to them and the horrible truth is both Iraq and the rest of the world will just have to wait out the Bush presidency for things to have even a hope of being adressed in a sensible fashion. Maybe in 2009, when he’s gone, it will matter more what we call the civil war. But by then, what’s going on over there could have spread out into something far larger:

Despite President Bush’s repeated denials, the figures are clear: 900 sectarian killings in a single month in Iraq means a civil war is well under way.

Iraq is a nation of 25 million people. In the United States, that level of killing would proportionately equal almost 11,000 people killed in riots, reprisal killings and sectarian clashes in a single month.

By comparison, the 30 years of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland from 1968 to 1998 saw 3,600 people killed in a small population of 1.5 million. Proportionately, that would equate to 60,000 dead over 30 years in Iraq, or 2,000 killed per year. Instead, if the current Iraqi violence simply stays at the current level and does not escalate any further, it will take 10,800 Iraqi civilian lives this year. That rate would be more than five times the average rate of the Northern Irish conflict.

The rate of killings in Iraq is already as bad as during the horrendous 1975-1991 Lebanese Civil War, in which 150,000 to 200,000 people were killed over 16 years — an average of between 9,375 and 12,500 people were killed there per year.

These comparisons, of course, can be misleading because in those conflicts, as in almost all civil wars, the rate of killing is not uniform but explodes in peaks and then settles down at lower levels for long periods of time.

But the comparisons are unfortunately revealing in another way — once the kind of polarizing aimless cycle of sectarian retaliatory killings between paramilitary forces in the two communities that have lived together for many centuries begins, it is often impossible to end it for decades, or before hundreds of thousands of people have been killed or, as was the case in Lebanon, both disasters have happened.

Armtwisting For Jesus

by digby

There’s lots of speculation about what “conservative organization” Tom Delay is going to work for in northern Virginia. Most people think he’s going to become a lobbyist, but I would imagine that someone with his legal problems is not going to do that under the advice of his lawyers.

Delay said in his interview with TIME:

DeLay:I made a speech last week, and that pretty much cinched it for me. A good friend of mine, Dr. Rick Scarborough, who started—and I urged him, and we’ve worked together over the years—an organization called Vision America, which is out recruiting pastors to get involved in the political arena. He asked me to come speak. He was having a conference on the war on Christianity. So I made a speech on Wednesday. It was covered by C-Span and, frankly, a bunch of cameras. I felt very good, very free about giving that speech. The reaction was incredible—just an outpouring of love and support from the audience. It was probably the one single event that convinced me: I can DO this. I could keep fighting for the things I believe in, outside of Congress.

TIME: What was it that made you feel free, and what was your main point?

DeLay:My main point was that this country was built on morals and religion. Our greatest leaders were very strong believers. There is a connection between religion and politics, and religion and government. There has to be for this country to have accomplished all it’s accomplished and for its future. How many times have the great leaders—Ronald Reagan, Roosevelt, Lincoln, George Washington—have said there is a connection between morals and religion. And there has to be. The people that go to church understand that a country has to be based on some sort of religion and fear of God because they understand that.

Christine DeLay: They’re accountable.

DeLay: Yeah. If you know that we’re all sinners, then you know that we have to work hard to have a moral foundation. So I felt very liberated in being able to say that. I didn’t have to worry about being the spokesman for the Republican Party and all that kind of stuff.

Christine DeLay: Plus, they were all your friends.

I know. It’s amazing.

I think Delay is going to join Vision America, his good friend Rick Scarborough‘s organization. He’s going to reinvent himself as a preacher. And I have a sneaking suspicion he’s going to be involved with this.

The interesting thing about this is that the religious right in general is a tiny bit spooked by this thing — not Scarbororugh, an operator who makes Elmer Gantry look like Ghandi. But Dobson’s dauchshund, Tony Perkins, was a little flustered last week in this interview:

MATTHEWS: So you want to identify with Rick Scarborough’s, Reverend Rick Scarborough’s claim that the reason Tom DeLay is in trouble with the courts, with the Democrats, with the media, is because he’s a Christian. Are you going to identify with that argument?

PERKINS: I would not say that in total.

MATTHEWS: But he did.

PERKINS: I’m just saying that I think that that has made him a target.

MATTHEWS: It has?

PERKINS: I think it has.

MATTHEWS: His religion?

PERKINS: The fact that he has been so out front on many of these issues. Now in terms of his legal problems or what he’s facing today, those stand on their own. But I think that clearly anyone who stands up and identifies with the evangelical community if a very pronounced way as he has and …

MATTHEWS: … Is Abramoff in trouble because of his religion?

PERKINS: No.

MATTHEWS: He just got five years and 10 months today.

PERKINS: No, and he’s pleaded guilty to committing crimes. Tom DeLay has not been convicted of anything, nor has he said.

Even if he’s convicted of crimes, he’ll just do a Chuck Colson. It’s quite the racket these rightwing Christians have going. When you think about it, it’s perfect for Tom Delay.

Oh and in case you wonder what Rick Scarborough’s all about, I think this says it all:

.

The White House

April 18, 2005

Rove: White House ‘strongly’ behind DeLay
Bush aide says embattled House majority leader ‘a close ally’

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The White House stands “strongly” behind Tom DeLay amid ethical questions over the House majority leader’s fund- raising and overseas trips, deputy chief of staff Karl Rove said Monday.

Rove, the strategist who ran President Bush’s two presidential campaigns, said DeLay, a Texas Republican, has been the target of partisan attacks by “desperate” Democrats.

“Tom DeLay is going to continue to be a strong and effective majority leader for the Republicans in the House,” he said on CNN’s “Inside Politics.”

[…]

“We strongly support Tom DeLay. He’s a good man, a close ally of this administration,” Rove said in a rare television interview.

Newspaper articles have said that DeLay went on overseas trips paid for by lobbyists. That would be a violation of House rules if proved to be true.

The majority leader says he has done nothing improper and told CNN earlier this month that he was the target of a “liberal media” smear campaign. (Full story)

[…]

Rove said he was confident the questions surrounding DeLay would be “resolved to everybody’s satisfaction” by the House ethics committee.

[…]

“The issue here is the abuse of power — and it’s not just Tom DeLay,” said Hoyer, the House Democratic whip. “It’s Republican abuse of power. It’s abuse of power in the House rules. It’s abuse of power in the ethics process.”

Rove said Democrats are attacking DeLay because they have no ideas of their own.

“I think they’re just desperate,” he said. “They’re not offering ideas in the debate, they’re not being constructive, and so some of their members are taking potshots at Tom DeLay.”

.

The Churches

Perkins Leads Salute to Tom DeLay with Prominent Conservative Groups

WASHINGTON, May 10, 2005 /PRNewswire/ — Family Research Council (FRC) PresidentTony Perkins will join an assembly of other prominent conservatives including, Ed Feulner of The Heritage Foundation, David Keene of American Conservative Union and Paul Weyrich of Free Congress Foundation, to pay tribute to Representative Tom DeLay of Texas.

“Tom DeLay has been a friend of the family in the Congress,” said Tony Perkins, President of Family Research Council.

“We are very privileged to have this opportunity to honor an upstanding member of the United States Congress. Tom DeLay has worked tirelessly to help the United States return to the respectful moral values that so many Americans treasure. I believe that Tom DeLay is a valuable asset to the United States Congress and in turn, a valuable asset to his constituents,” continues Perkins.

“I will proudly stand beside Tom DeLay and I commend him for his stalwart defense of American values in the face of criticism and threats to his elected office.”

The Movement

March 30, 2005

An Open Letter to Conservatives
by Morton C. Blackwell

Fellow Conservatives,

I’m writing to ask you to join me in doing something effective against the leftist organizations and liberal media who have launched truly vicious attacks on U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay.

They attack Tom DeLay for just one reason: Congressman DeLay is one of the most effective fighters for conservative principles.

Time and again, Majority Leader Tom DeLay manages the strategy which wins for conservatives in the narrowly divided House of Representatives.

I know personally that Tom Delay is almost obsessively careful to get good legal advice before he takes any step which might conceivably be questioned under the law or suspected as an infraction of House rules. None of the leftist uproar has contains any evidence he has done anything illegal or violated the House rules.

The only fire under all that smoke generated by the leftist attacks is their burning hatred of a good man.

Conservatives must respond with a richly deserved attack on leftist groups and liberal media trying to lynch Tom DeLay. That’s why I’m writing to you.

And you and I must do all we can to make sure any politician who hopes to have conservative support in the future had better be in the forefront as we attack those who attack Tom DeLay.

Media and organizations who would let left wingers get away with almost anything are trying to generate a feeding frenzy against DeLay. No matter what he does, they attack him. Not content to make mountains out of mole hills, they invent mole hills to make mountains.

If Tom DeLay preferred Fords to Chevrolets or Chevrolets to Fords, the leftists would gin up reasons to attack his preference either way.

Unscrupulous leftist media will huff and puff to breath life into any trivial or phony leftist complaint against any act of any powerful conservative, no matter how upright and innocent. And they’ll keep doing this until a public reaction begins to embarrass and damage those spreading the propaganda.

You’ve seen this all your life.

They tried without success to generate a feeding frenzy against Ronald Reagan for many years. They tried it without success against George W. Bush’s reelection. Now they’re trying it against Tom DeLay.

Prominent newspapers have run a dozen almost identical stories, re-hashing the same foggy complaints, each with a different headline. After all those outrageous, repetitious attacks, the liberal news media have the gall to say that he has become controversial.

It’s clear that major liberal print and broadcast media have assigned full-time reporters in this concerted effort to “get” Tom DeLay.

The “non-partisan” leftist groups that attacked President Bush all last year and those groups’ big donors are now pouring resources into the current anti-DeLay effort.

Make no mistake about it, their purpose is to damage or destroy any effective conservative. If the attacks succeed, the left eliminates an enemy and tends to discourage any other conservative who is effective.

You and I must not let the left get away with this.

That’s why I’m writing to you — to ask that you make an immediate and sustained effort to stop the left from destroying this outstanding, successful, honorable conservative leader.

Earlier this month, at my personal expense, I had printed up some hundreds of lapel stickers which read, “Hooray for DeLay.” I distributed them to eager conservatives at political meetings. But much more can and ought to be done.

Here are three important things you can do:

First, vigorously respond to the onslaught by leftist groups and the liberal media. Attack the attackers for their outrageous bias and point out the real reason they are attacking Tom DeLay: He is one of our most effective conservative leaders.

Second, ask the leaders of any conservative organization you know what they are doing to uphold Tom DeLay against the vicious attacks against him. They should activate their members, readers, donors, viewers, and listeners.

Even non-profit groups can do many things helpful to Tom DeLay without endangering their tax status.

Virtually every conservative cause has benefited greatly from the devotion and skill of Tom DeLay. He fights our battles beside us. We owe him our strongest support now.

Third, and perhaps most powerful, by letter, phone call, email, or personal visit, ask the Republican Members of Congress from your state and others Members you know what they are doing to attack those who are mounting the biased, unfair attacks on Tom DeLay. They will listen to you.

Ultimately, the purpose of all the left’s attacks is to remove Tom from his position of leadership. That’s why they are doing this. They must not succeed.

Please don’t get bogged down answering all the absurd, groundless attacks. The left can and will raise phony new issues faster than you can respond to the old ones. Congressman DeLay has fully and publicly dealt with these false or nit-picky issues.

Focus your attention on attacking his ill-motivated attackers — and encourage others to do what is right and stand beside Tom DeLay.

Morton C. Blackwell

The Loser

by tristero

Any day that begins with more tsouris for Tom DeLay is a good day in my book. But his resignation from Congress – that’s cause for celebration. A few points:

1. I don’t see any reason why DeLay can’t leave Congress today.

2. But if he must stay until May, then I strongly suggest that the Capitol police drop their attempts to arrest McKinney and instead devote a considerable amount of manpower to trailing DeLay until he’s out of there. Count the towels in the bathroom. Count the ashtrays and pencils. I’m not not kidding: if he came over to my house to do a fumigation job, I wouldn’t leave him alone for a second. Would you?

3. I once read that Bernard Herrmann asked Alfred Hitchcock what job he wanted if could have any job in the world. Without skipping a beat, Hitchcock dead-panned, “A hanging judge.” Well, I would make a lousy hanging judge, as I would a professor – the few times I’ve taught, my colleagues have had to spend serious time talking me out of giving automatic A’s. So I know this will anger a lot of you, but I care far less about punishing DeLay than I do about spending time and energy fixing all the disasters he caused. I firmly believe he should receive a fair trial before being sentenced (grin), but it’s more important that Texas recover from the DeLay gerrymandering, and that laws get passed to make the corrupt practices DeLay gorged on far more difficult to do.

DeLay is history. His legacy unfortunately is not. Now, when he is convicted, part of his sentence should forbid him can never to get close to any office or government official again, other than his parole officer. But the results of his awful deeds must be reversed as soon as possible, before it becomes in any way settled business. And we should not forget that while indulging in some genuinely justified schadenfreude.

[Note to the humor-challenged: Point 2 is satirical. That should be obvious, but the tip-off is the notion that I would hire DeLay to fumigate my apartment. I only hire people whose competence I can trust, thank you very much. The other points are serious, including that DeLay should be urged to leave immediately.]

The Winner

by tristero

Woo Hoo! Congratulations to Digby for his Koufax! Well-deserved and hard-earned by posting one splendid insight after another.

It is hard to believe what it was like back in the dark days of 2001 through early 2003. At that time serious liberal commentary was next to impossible to find. The only hint that there Others Like Me still alive in America was the bi-weekly Krugman column in the NY Times. Everyone else, including smart, close friends, had gone off the deep end, parroting one or another piece of nonsense from the Bush administration – “no way could Bush have prevented 9/11 by forcing the government agencies to be more vigilant” was the most prevalent, even among the most liberal people I know.

Somehow, I discovered the blogging world and Hullabaloo was one of the first I found. And there he was – I mean Howard Beale. Digby had read my thoughts: Some crazies had looked at “Network” – which was hilarious when it came out but had seemed slightly over the top, even a tad ludicrous back then – and mistook its satire for a how-to guide. Digby got it. I started reading him regularly, and linked to him often. HIs posts literally helped to get me sane as I watched my country go over a cliff at the whim of a clearly delusional frat-boy of a president. I’m thrilled he’s been recognized for his contribution to the left blogosphere.