Skip to content

Digby's Hullabaloo Posts

Tom Demento

by digby

Who knew Tom Delay had such a dry sense of humor?

Soon-to-retire Rep. Tom DeLay (R.-Tex.) said today he would personally file an ethics complaint against Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D.-Ga.) for striking a Capitol Police officer should no other House member do so first.

DeLay’s comments came during a wide-ranging interview at his Capitol Hill office with reporters, including HUMAN EVENTS Editor Terry Jeffrey.

“If nobody in this House files an ethics charge, I am,” DeLay said in response to a question about McKinney. “Her behavior is outrageous. And it’s not the only time.”

DeLay was asked if he supported the Capitol Police’s actions following the incident with McKinney, which took place last week when she bypassed a metal detector and a police officer stopped her.

“You bet,” he said.

“It’s outrageous behavior,” he said about McKinney. “Had it been Tom DeLay, the Ethics Committee would have met the next day.”

Of course the ethics committee doesn’t meet for any reason whatsoever and I guess that whole “Delay Rule” thing was secret Democratic plot to take over the minds of Republicans and make them act like asses. (A common leftist tactic.)

This guy has spent the entire day giving interviews in which he says perfectly ridiculous things like this with a straight face and utter sincerity. He’s claiming that he’s a victim of the politics of personal destruction – he’s not under any kind of suspicion — he’s never done one thing wrong — he’s going to keep playing checkers, er… golf.

The interviewers can’t lay a hand on him. They are completely useless in the face of someone who is willing to look them right in the eye and dare them to call him on his blatant, obvious lies. Matthews’ show was hallucinogenic. But this Blitzer interview was awesome in its serene, otherworldly insanity:

REP. TOM DELAY (R), TEXAS: Good evening.

BLITZER: Here’s what you said on January 7th. Listen to this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DELAY: As you know, I am still a candidate for re-election this November and I plan to run a very vigorous campaign and I plan to win it.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BLITZER: Since then, you won your primary. What has changed since January 7th?

DELAY: Well, it became quite obvious to me that this election was going to be a referendum on me and not the values and priorities of my constituents. It’s going to be nasty. Millions of dollars would be spent by the Democrats to take this seat.

I have worked my entire adult life for the Republican majority and the conservative movement, and I felt like that the best course of action would be to step aside so a Republican who — any Republican can take this seat. And I can take my talents elsewhere and work for the conservative movement outside the House.

BLITZER: You mean someone who is new to the business, in effect, not as experienced as you, a Republican, would have a better chance of winning that seat than Tom DeLay?

DELAY: Yes, they would.

I think I could win. But the damage that would be done not only to me personally in my career, but the damage to the district that would be done isn’t good for the district. And my constituents deserve better, they deserve a Republican.

BLITZER: Some of your critics already have come out, and you know this quite well, and they say there are other reasons in effect right now; that the timing of your decision coming on the heels of a couple of your former top aides pleading guilty and now cooperating with federal prosecutors in this expanding lobbying investigation involving Jack Abramoff; that, that may have had a role to play in your decision to step down.

DELAY: I made this decision before I even knew that Tony Rudy was going to plead guilty. Those are people that believe in the politics of personal destruction. They’ve been trying to destroy my reputation for 10 years.

They’re trying to criminalize politics. The Democrats have no agenda. They have no ideas. They have no solutions. All they have is the politics of personal destruction.

There is nothing that connects me to Abramoff or any of the activities that they have. I am not a target of this investigation. I haven’t even been interviewed by these investigators.

BLITZER: How do you know you’re not a target of the investigation?

DELAY: The Department of Justice has told my lawyers that I am not a target.

BLITZER: They have formally told your lawyers you are not a target?

DELAY: Exactly right.

BLITZER: Because in the past, sometimes that can be conflicting. That doesn’t necessarily mean you’re not a target, even if they say so.

DELAY: Well, I know I’m not a target because I know I haven’t done anything wrong. I’ve paid lawyers. They spent four months investigating me as if they were prosecuting me — looking through everything for the 20 years I’ve been in Congress, and they have found nothing that is even unethical, much less illegal.

BLITZER: What about your wife?

DELAY: My wife is the same. She’s an honorable woman of great integrity. She has the right to work in this country, just like anybody else. And she has the right to be paid.

BLITZER: The suggestion by federal prosecutors, these former aides of yours — Tony Rudy and Michael Scanlon — that there was, in their words, “a far-reaching criminal operation” being run out of your office when you were the House majority leader. That’s a powerful accusation.

DELAY: No, that’s a powerful indictment of what they were doing. And none of us…

BLITZER: And then they pleaded guilty and they’re cooperating with federal prosecutors right now.

DELAY: It has nothing to do with the people that worked in my office or us. They were doing that on their own.

You know, I have hundreds of people that have worked for me — wonderful young people. These are two that may have done something wrong.

And a leader’s office is a whirlwind of activity every day. And so you hire people and you trust them with the responsibility that you give them.

If they violate that trust, they do that on their own. It has nothing to do with our operation or the way we do things and did things in my office.

BLITZER: The normal procedure with these federal prosecutors — as you well know, these investigations — they go after relatively small fish to find and catch a big fish. You would obviously be a huge fish in this operation.

How worried are you that these former aides of yours might say something or provide some sort of evidence or suggestion that could further cause you grave, serious legal problems?

DELAY: I’m not worried at all. I know I haven’t done anything wrong.

Wolf, I’m not stupid. The Democrats have scrutinized my operation — every part of my operation — for 20 years and, most particularly, in the 11 years we’ve been in the majority.

I would be incredibly stupid to do anything illegal, because they would find it — even if I wanted to, and I don’t.

I have lawyers check every decision that I make. If I come up with an idea, we make sure it’s within the spirit of the law or in the House rules. We check everything.

BLITZER: What would you have done differently involving your relationship with the now-indicted Jack Abramoff, the Republican lobbyist? Looking back on that relationship that you had with him, what would you have done differently given what you know right now?

DELAY: I wouldn’t have done anything differently. The Jack Abramoff…

BLITZER: You would have still gone on that trip to Scotland and played golf at St. Andrews?

DELAY: Excuse me, but those trips were vital trips. I was working with Margaret Thatcher in building a conservative movement in England. She had asked me to come over and work with conservatives in England because they had just lost an election and they wanted my advice on how to rebuild their conservative movement.

I worked very, very hard on that trip. And yes, at the end of the trip, I went and played golf. I love golf.

BLITZER: Was that a mistake?

DELAY: No.

BLITZER: Given the appearance that some might say, you know, “He’s going to one of the great golf courses in the world at St. Andrews. He’s playing golf and” — what the argument is — “on somebody else’s dime.”

DELAY: That’s an appearance created by the national media and my detractors. There is nothing wrong. There was nothing illegal. There was nothing against the House rules in taking that trip to help build a conservative movement.

I’m involved all around the world. I’ve been involved in Christian persecution in China. I’m involved in Jewish persecution in Russia. I’m involved in supporting Israel. I’m involved in the war on terror in Indonesia and in Malaysia. I have been heavily involved in a lot of issues — and I travel. And I also play golf.

BLITZER: But everybody makes mistakes, right? You’re not perfect.

DELAY: No, I’m not perfect.

BLITZER: You’ve got to look back and say to yourself: “It’s only normal. Yes, I would have done a few things differently.”

DELAY: No.

BLITZER: There’s nothing you would have done differently that could have avoided some of this embarrassment?

DELAY: No. This is trying to create a strawman and trying to demonize me and making me look different than I really am. I am very involved. I have never done anything — while I’ve been in elective office — for my own personal gain. Yes, I have a hobby. It’s called golf. It’s the only thing I do for myself. And if people want to criticize me for playing golf after I’ve worked hard for seven days, then go ahead and criticize me.

I’d still — wherever I go, I try to play golf.

BLITZER: What do you want to do next?

Because a lot of your colleagues when they leave Congress, you know what they do — they go out and become lobbyists.

DELAY: I want to continue my effort to work with the conservative movement.

I think I can bring a unifying force to the conservative movement. I want to continue to elect Republicans and grow the Republican majority, something I’ve worked on for 21 years.

And I’m very proud of our record of building a good conservative movement not just here in Washington, D.C., but all over the country. I think I can do that. And I think I have the experience and the talent to accomplish some pretty amazing things.

BLITZER: Do you want to be a lobbyist?

DELAY: I don’t know what the future holds for me.

I’m in God’s hands and he guides me. And whatever I can do to help this country by leading it in a conservative direction, I’m going to do.

BLITZER: There have been a lot of Republicans out there today at least privately saying, you know, it’s sort of a collective sigh of relief — Tom DeLay is stepping down, one less problem that they have to worry about given the enormous problems the Republicans face right now.

Do you feel a sense of betrayal given the enormously important work that you did, the hard work as the majority whip and then the majority leader? You really hammered that place and got the votes you wanted for the Republicans.

DELAY: Well, that’s what brought this all upon me.

We were effective in changing this country. We were effective in changing the culture of this town. We were effective in advancing the conservative movement. Some people…

BLITZER: Is there a sense of betrayal that you feel right now?

DELAY: Some people don’t want to stand up and fight for what they believe in. They would rather just sit in a job and carry on.

I am passionate about what I believe in and I feel like I have a mandate to stand up for what I believe in, and I’m very proud of that.

BLITZER: You feel let down, though, a sense of betrayal at all by some of these comments that are coming out by your fellow Republicans?

DELAY: No, that’s their problem.

I keep focused on what I believe in and standing up for what I believe in.

BLITZER: Thanks for coming in. We hope you come back.

DELAY: My pleasure.

That was so demented it sent chills down my spine. Blitzer looked kind of creeped out by it, too. He doesn’t just intimidate people into doing what he wants them to do. He insists that they pay him fealty by pretending that he isn’t stark raving mad. His eyes are completely dead. No wonder nobody ever crossed him.

.

Katherine’s Decompensating

by tristero

As we famously know, John Aravosis encountered a very nice Katherine Harris at a black tie affair. Apparently, however, this is something that can’t be sustained for very long. Harris is going majorly weird with her staff and others:

[I]n the past 10 days, Harris has:

•Had locks changed and posted a security guard at the door of her campaign headquarters in Tampa and had former staff members escorted in to retrieve their belongings.

•Told a gathering of supporters in Cocoa Beach on Saturday that the Republican Party had “infiltrated” her campaign staff to put “knives in my back.”

•Told a reporter that a longtime, trusted political adviser had leaked a story about her staff members quitting, then called back to retract the comments.

•Announced hiring her new staff without identifying them.

Those events come atop previous reversals and contradictions, including her announcement last month that she would spend her inheritance from her father on her campaign, which she changed, saying she would sell her assets.

Former campaign manager Jim Dornan, who left in November, called the most recent events in the campaign “unbelievable.”

“It smacks of real paranoia,” he said of the headquarters lockout and comments about infiltration. “That campaign staff was so loyal to her, and to be treated like that is absolutely unconscionable.”

In interviews over the past few weeks, speaking in confidence, former employees from Harris’ congressional and campaign staffs said the trauma of the unexpected death of her father has taken a toll.

“She’s in total meltdown. The campaign is in chaos,” said a longtime Republican operative who worked closely with Harris until recently.

I’m sorry she lost her father recently. I’m not sorry her campaign’s falling apart. Clearly the stress is too much. She should quit. Immediately. And not only for her own good, but for the good of the country.

Hat tip to The All Spin Zone

Delay’s Dupes

by digby

Last summer I wrote a piece about a woman named Mary Fowler. She is a good, hard working woman from Oklahoma, a member of the Christian Right. Rose Aguillar interviewed her as part of a project to speak to people across the country:

Why do you think we’re in Iraq? People say we’re freeing the Iraqis one minute and then change their opinion and say they’re horrible people.

Soldiers over there say we don’t get half the news. There’s so much good going on. The majority of the people appreciate the help. The majority, not the weirdos who are deceived.

Where do you get your information about the war?

The Bible and the 700 Club. I also listen to preachers who know what’s going on. Pat Robertson.

What do you like about Bush?

He’s a praying man of god. He’s a family man and he does care. He gets blamed for everything. If this country would turn back to god, things would get better. You can’t go on killing babies and allowing homosexual stuff to stay. We do love the people, but we don’t love their actions.

Do you think talking about homosexuality does anything to improve healthcare or poverty?

I guess for me I’ve always had to trust the lord for the next job, which is usually housecleaning. If you have your eyes on him, he’ll take care of you. The government can’t help us.

Do you always vote?

Yes, I volunteered for the Republican Party and I enjoyed it very much.

Have you always been Republican?

When I first registered, I was a Democrat. Just from studying in school, I thought that’s what I wanted to be because I believed in government for the people, by the people and of the people. But after I was saved, I realized the Republican beliefs are me so I switched and I’m glad I did.

What does it mean to be a Republican?

Republicans pick the people who believe like we do.

You mean believe in the Bible?

Yes and godly principles. If we kick god out, we’ll be like other countries that have AIDS, sickness and poverty. God created the earth, he created the rules and he knows what’s best for everybody.

Unfortunately, we have AIDS, sickness and poverty in this country.

Yes, because we allow homosexuality.

You blame homosexuality for AIDS, sickness and poverty?

Well, sometimes people are innocent. This nation is in trouble. The ACLU are run by communists and funded by communists. What does that tell you? They want to take god away from us.

The ACLU once helped Pat Robertson’s son set up churches. They also helped Jerry Falwell fight church restrictions three years ago. If they wanted to take god way from you, why would they help Pat Robertson’s son and Jerry Falwell?

I haven’t heard about that. I’m sure there are a few good people in the ACLU.

I’ve interviewed a lot of people on this trip and while they want freedom of religion, none have said they want to take god away.

When they first started the country, those that didn’t believe in Jesus were put in jail. Once a country is dedicated to god and founded on its principles, it has to stay that way.

What issues are most important to you?

Getting the right Supreme Court Justice in you. I want god back in the schools. They kick god out of schools and they wonder why we have drugs and sex in the schools.

I suggested that it would not be very difficult to persuade Mary Fowler that the Republican party wasn’t fulfilling her vision of what government should do and considering her views, she would probably not vote at all. I wrote:

Mary Fowler is an evangelical Christian who believes that Republicans pick their candidates based upon their devotion to Jesus. In fact, she sees Republicanism as part of her church. For her, religion and politics are the same thing.

[…]

Mary Fowler can be dealt with only one way — we must separate Republicanism from her church. It won’t be possible to out church them but it can be done by exposing them. Republicans are not godly. When she finds out that they aren’t godly she will stop voting for them — most likely stop voting at all. (And unless she learns to separate religion from politics that is probably the best thing.) It won’t be easy to convince her, but she is much more attached to her vision of the Bible than the Republican party. She chose Republicanism after she was saved, not before. She will choose Jesus over Tom Delay if push comes to shove.

I do not wish Mary Fowler would stop voting. I wish she would vote for Democrats. But considering her belief system, I do not think it’s possible. It is not evil to want people like Mary Fowler, who do not believe in the US constitution or the principles on which this country is founded, not to be involved in politics. Certainly, it is in my best interest that someone like her not volunteer her time and money to a cause that seeks to destroy everything I believe in.

Evangelicals used to believe that politics was a bad business and existed in a “worldly” sphere that didn’t terribly affect them. It took some theological jiujitsu , some savvy political operatives and some huckster preachers to change that around and turn them into a behemoth voting block for the Republican party. They are voting for a lie, having been duped by Tom Delay and other phony Jesus pimps into believing that their religious beliefs are also political beliefs and it’s just not so.

These people are essential to the GOP machine. If they come to see that the Republican party for the criminal enterprise it is, this will not happen again:

… evangelical Christian groups were often more aggressive and sometimes better organized on the ground than the Bush campaign. The White House struggled to stay abreast of the Christian right and consulted with the movement’s leaders in weekly conference calls. But in many respects, Christian activists led the charge that GOP operatives followed and capitalized upon.

[…]

In battlegrounds such as Ohio, scores of clergy members attended legal sessions explaining how they could talk about the election from the pulpit. Hundreds of churches launched registration drives, thousands of churchgoers registered to vote, and millions of voter guides were distributed by Christian and antiabortion groups.

The rallying cry for many social conservatives was opposition to same-sex marriage. But concern about the Supreme Court, abortion, school prayer and pornography also motivated these “values voters.” Same-sex marriage, said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, was “the hood ornament on the family values wagon that carried the president to a second term.”

These are the foot soldiers in the Republican revolution. It’s well worth our while to get them to lay down their arms and go home to their churches. Tom Delay is wrapping his fetid, reptilian reputation around the necks of the evangelicals and we should make sure they smell it for what it is.

Mary Fowler is a decent law abiding person. I think it’s good for her and good for us to let Mary know the extent to which “worldly” politics have failed her. It’s up to her what she does with that knowledge.

.

Democrats are from Earth, Republicans are from Pluto

by digby

Delay just said that the Democrats are drunk with power. I’m not kidding.

It’s a common delusion among Plutonians. Here’s Hindquarters:

By “the left” I’m including almost the entire Democratic Party, you can count the exceptions on your fingers, you can name them, Zell Miller, Joe Lieberman…The whole mainstream of the party is engaged in an effort that is a betrayal of America, what they care about is not winning the war on terror…I don’t think they care about the danger to us as Americans or the danger to people in other countries. They care about power.

Unfortunately, I’m having a hard time understand what Matthews is saying today his mouth is so full. I’m pretty sure he just spent five minutes talking about how Tom is a caring foster dad.

.

Reverend Tom: Scourge Of The Termites, Saviour Of The Right

by tristero

At the time I wrote my post suggesting, among other things that it would be better to concentrate on cleaning up the messes DeLay created than on whatever punishment DeLay will receive for the myriad offenses he’s committed, I was unaware of the interview with TIME that DeLay gave and which Digby quotes. My bad. I should have realized from the getgo what the future will likely hold for Tom DeLay.

There is so much money to be had in the rightwing christianist racket, and so much potential for power trips and money scams that it would be a miracle – a genuine miracle – if DeLay doesn’t reinvent himself as the Second Coming of Chuck Colson. What to do? I suspect there is probably a legal way to keep DeLay’s paws out of politics but to ban him from religious work that just maybe have an intersection with American politics – now that’s gonna be hard.

Reverend Tom…a nauseating thought because it’s so plausible as to be very likely.

One thing to do is to make sure that his crimes – and their consequences – are made abundantly, publicly clear, so that whenever Reverend Tom claims he’s been washed pure in the Blood of the Lamb, people will remember that the blot on his character is stained deep.

So I apologize for so much as suggesting DeLay can be safely ignored merely because his congressional career is over. He can’t and he shouldn’t be.

Voices From The front

by digby

I highly recommend this series in the LA Times about wounded military in Iraq and Afghanistan. (There are some very graphic pictures, so don’t look if you have a weak stomach. It’s the real face of the war in all its bloody horror.)

It’s quite a tribute to these soldiers’ courage and the miracle of modern medicine. There have been more than 17,000 wounded in Iraq thus far, an average of 110 per week. In past wars a vast number of them would have died. Today, with great battlefield medicine and immediate transport to Europe and the States, most of them pull through. But their wounds are grievous and their lives will never be the same. The primary means of wounding them isn’t bullets — it’s explosive devices.

These people have made a great sacrifice for a cynical, political purpose and it makes me furious. It’s not the first time this has happened in history, but it damned well ought to be the last time the US ever does it.

.

Iraq: UPI Says It’s A Civil War

by tristero

Seems a reasonable conclusion to me. What makes naming it so important is that it would help articulate what an approriate US and international policy should be towards Iraq.

Please note: “would help.” That assumes a competent US administration, or even merely an administration with a toehold on reality. Since we have neither, whether we call the situation in Iraq a Civil War or just the absolute, tragically worst of the many fuckups that Bush directly created doesn’t seem to make much difference right now. Nothing rational will get through to them and the horrible truth is both Iraq and the rest of the world will just have to wait out the Bush presidency for things to have even a hope of being adressed in a sensible fashion. Maybe in 2009, when he’s gone, it will matter more what we call the civil war. But by then, what’s going on over there could have spread out into something far larger:

Despite President Bush’s repeated denials, the figures are clear: 900 sectarian killings in a single month in Iraq means a civil war is well under way.

Iraq is a nation of 25 million people. In the United States, that level of killing would proportionately equal almost 11,000 people killed in riots, reprisal killings and sectarian clashes in a single month.

By comparison, the 30 years of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland from 1968 to 1998 saw 3,600 people killed in a small population of 1.5 million. Proportionately, that would equate to 60,000 dead over 30 years in Iraq, or 2,000 killed per year. Instead, if the current Iraqi violence simply stays at the current level and does not escalate any further, it will take 10,800 Iraqi civilian lives this year. That rate would be more than five times the average rate of the Northern Irish conflict.

The rate of killings in Iraq is already as bad as during the horrendous 1975-1991 Lebanese Civil War, in which 150,000 to 200,000 people were killed over 16 years — an average of between 9,375 and 12,500 people were killed there per year.

These comparisons, of course, can be misleading because in those conflicts, as in almost all civil wars, the rate of killing is not uniform but explodes in peaks and then settles down at lower levels for long periods of time.

But the comparisons are unfortunately revealing in another way — once the kind of polarizing aimless cycle of sectarian retaliatory killings between paramilitary forces in the two communities that have lived together for many centuries begins, it is often impossible to end it for decades, or before hundreds of thousands of people have been killed or, as was the case in Lebanon, both disasters have happened.

Armtwisting For Jesus

by digby

There’s lots of speculation about what “conservative organization” Tom Delay is going to work for in northern Virginia. Most people think he’s going to become a lobbyist, but I would imagine that someone with his legal problems is not going to do that under the advice of his lawyers.

Delay said in his interview with TIME:

DeLay:I made a speech last week, and that pretty much cinched it for me. A good friend of mine, Dr. Rick Scarborough, who started—and I urged him, and we’ve worked together over the years—an organization called Vision America, which is out recruiting pastors to get involved in the political arena. He asked me to come speak. He was having a conference on the war on Christianity. So I made a speech on Wednesday. It was covered by C-Span and, frankly, a bunch of cameras. I felt very good, very free about giving that speech. The reaction was incredible—just an outpouring of love and support from the audience. It was probably the one single event that convinced me: I can DO this. I could keep fighting for the things I believe in, outside of Congress.

TIME: What was it that made you feel free, and what was your main point?

DeLay:My main point was that this country was built on morals and religion. Our greatest leaders were very strong believers. There is a connection between religion and politics, and religion and government. There has to be for this country to have accomplished all it’s accomplished and for its future. How many times have the great leaders—Ronald Reagan, Roosevelt, Lincoln, George Washington—have said there is a connection between morals and religion. And there has to be. The people that go to church understand that a country has to be based on some sort of religion and fear of God because they understand that.

Christine DeLay: They’re accountable.

DeLay: Yeah. If you know that we’re all sinners, then you know that we have to work hard to have a moral foundation. So I felt very liberated in being able to say that. I didn’t have to worry about being the spokesman for the Republican Party and all that kind of stuff.

Christine DeLay: Plus, they were all your friends.

I know. It’s amazing.

I think Delay is going to join Vision America, his good friend Rick Scarborough‘s organization. He’s going to reinvent himself as a preacher. And I have a sneaking suspicion he’s going to be involved with this.

The interesting thing about this is that the religious right in general is a tiny bit spooked by this thing — not Scarbororugh, an operator who makes Elmer Gantry look like Ghandi. But Dobson’s dauchshund, Tony Perkins, was a little flustered last week in this interview:

MATTHEWS: So you want to identify with Rick Scarborough’s, Reverend Rick Scarborough’s claim that the reason Tom DeLay is in trouble with the courts, with the Democrats, with the media, is because he’s a Christian. Are you going to identify with that argument?

PERKINS: I would not say that in total.

MATTHEWS: But he did.

PERKINS: I’m just saying that I think that that has made him a target.

MATTHEWS: It has?

PERKINS: I think it has.

MATTHEWS: His religion?

PERKINS: The fact that he has been so out front on many of these issues. Now in terms of his legal problems or what he’s facing today, those stand on their own. But I think that clearly anyone who stands up and identifies with the evangelical community if a very pronounced way as he has and …

MATTHEWS: … Is Abramoff in trouble because of his religion?

PERKINS: No.

MATTHEWS: He just got five years and 10 months today.

PERKINS: No, and he’s pleaded guilty to committing crimes. Tom DeLay has not been convicted of anything, nor has he said.

Even if he’s convicted of crimes, he’ll just do a Chuck Colson. It’s quite the racket these rightwing Christians have going. When you think about it, it’s perfect for Tom Delay.

Oh and in case you wonder what Rick Scarborough’s all about, I think this says it all:

.

The White House

April 18, 2005

Rove: White House ‘strongly’ behind DeLay
Bush aide says embattled House majority leader ‘a close ally’

WASHINGTON (CNN) — The White House stands “strongly” behind Tom DeLay amid ethical questions over the House majority leader’s fund- raising and overseas trips, deputy chief of staff Karl Rove said Monday.

Rove, the strategist who ran President Bush’s two presidential campaigns, said DeLay, a Texas Republican, has been the target of partisan attacks by “desperate” Democrats.

“Tom DeLay is going to continue to be a strong and effective majority leader for the Republicans in the House,” he said on CNN’s “Inside Politics.”

[…]

“We strongly support Tom DeLay. He’s a good man, a close ally of this administration,” Rove said in a rare television interview.

Newspaper articles have said that DeLay went on overseas trips paid for by lobbyists. That would be a violation of House rules if proved to be true.

The majority leader says he has done nothing improper and told CNN earlier this month that he was the target of a “liberal media” smear campaign. (Full story)

[…]

Rove said he was confident the questions surrounding DeLay would be “resolved to everybody’s satisfaction” by the House ethics committee.

[…]

“The issue here is the abuse of power — and it’s not just Tom DeLay,” said Hoyer, the House Democratic whip. “It’s Republican abuse of power. It’s abuse of power in the House rules. It’s abuse of power in the ethics process.”

Rove said Democrats are attacking DeLay because they have no ideas of their own.

“I think they’re just desperate,” he said. “They’re not offering ideas in the debate, they’re not being constructive, and so some of their members are taking potshots at Tom DeLay.”

.

The Churches

Perkins Leads Salute to Tom DeLay with Prominent Conservative Groups

WASHINGTON, May 10, 2005 /PRNewswire/ — Family Research Council (FRC) PresidentTony Perkins will join an assembly of other prominent conservatives including, Ed Feulner of The Heritage Foundation, David Keene of American Conservative Union and Paul Weyrich of Free Congress Foundation, to pay tribute to Representative Tom DeLay of Texas.

“Tom DeLay has been a friend of the family in the Congress,” said Tony Perkins, President of Family Research Council.

“We are very privileged to have this opportunity to honor an upstanding member of the United States Congress. Tom DeLay has worked tirelessly to help the United States return to the respectful moral values that so many Americans treasure. I believe that Tom DeLay is a valuable asset to the United States Congress and in turn, a valuable asset to his constituents,” continues Perkins.

I will proudly stand beside Tom DeLay and I commend him for his stalwart defense of American values in the face of criticism and threats to his elected office.”