Hegseth, seeming quite manic on Fox & Friends this morning, claims news of his latest war plans Signal group leaked as a way for someone who has since been fired to damage him pic.twitter.com/K2Nt36sC4d
Do all the “warfighters” in the Pentagon look at that guy and see a man they want to follow into battle? Are those who have to do the necessary work of logistics and intelligence within the military confident that he knows what he’s doing?
Does any American see that performance and feel confident that the national security of the United States is in the hands of a mature, stable competent leader?
Up until now I haven’t been literally afraid that we could come under attack of some sort or that a stupid mistake by the Trumpers could lead to an actual war but now I’m not so sure. The U.S. military leadership is in the midst of a chaotic meltdown and I think anything could happen.
A groundbreaking microscope at Harvard Medical School could lead to breakthroughs in cancer detection and research into longevity. But the scientist who developed computer scripts to read its images and unlock its full potential has been in an immigration detention center for two months — putting crucial scientific advancements at risk.
The scientist, the 30-year-old Russian-born Kseniia Pertova, worked at Harvard’s renowned Kirschner Lab until her arrest at a Boston airport in mid-February. She is now being held at ICE’s Richwood Correctional Center in Monroe, Louisiana, and fighting possible deportation to Russia, where she said she fears persecution and jail time over her protests against the war in Ukraine.
[…]
Dr. Leon Peshkin, a principal research scientist at Harvard’s Department of Systems Biology and Petrova’s manager and mentor, received a call from Customs and Border Protection on Feb. 16 after agents detained Petrova at Logan International Airport in Boston for failing to declare samples of frog embryos to be used in scientific research.
“We just got a call saying, ‘She’s denied entry. That’s all we can tell you to protect her privacy,’” he said. Peshkin added that the caller didn’t disclose Petrova’s whereabouts, leaving him scrambling to track her down.
Romanovsky said that CBP typically imposes two penalties for such customs violations: the forfeiture of the items and a fine, usually around $500, and that “for a first-time violation, the fine is typically reduced to $50.” Instead, officials canceled Petrova’s J-1 scholar visa.
“It appears to be part of a broader effort to create an unwelcoming and hostile environment for noncitizens,” Romanovsky said.
A DHS spokesperson told NBC News on Monday that Petrova had been “lawfully detained after lying to federal officers about carrying substances into the country.” “They asked if I have any biological samples in my luggage. I said yes,” Petrova said before describing her confusion over procedures and an interrogation by Customs and Border Patrol officers.
“Nobody knew what was happening to me. I didn’t have any contact, not to my lawyer, not to Leon, not to anybody. And the next day, they didn’t say what would happen. I was waiting in a cell,” she said.
No foreigner is safe in the United States. And I fear we are probably making the rest of the world unsafe for Americans. How could we possibly expect any different?
Marco Rubio says that unless you are here exercising your 1st amendment right to protest against someone Donald Trump considers a friend, legal visa holders have nothing to worry about. Uh huh. They’re throwing all kinds of students, tourists, scientists etc into detention (which just happens to be a money making operation for the private prison industry) and deporting legal residents for no reason at all. Aren’t any Republicans going to call on their good buddy Marco to put a stop to this?
There is so much to be appalled by that it’s paralyzing. But we can’t let ourselves get numb. This particular policy is one of the worst and it’s endangering all of us.
When I Googled Andy Borowitz‘s name just now, the AI offered “Is Andy Borowitz satire?” Why Google Borowitz? In reading the Breaking News headlines at The New Republic‘s landing page, it strikes me that in our new autocratic reality it’s becoming harder than ever to distinguish reality from satire. Viewed slightly askance, any of TNR’s headlines might be a Borowitz headline. Reality is challenging satire to a fight to the death.
Fox Host Suddenly Gets Amnesia About Trump’s Plan to Deport Citizens Republican Says Pete Hegseth’s Group Chat Is Fine Because of … 9/11? Trump Sends the Economy Tanking Over Fight With Fed Chair Ron Johnson Goes Full 9/11 Truther in Deranged Rant MAGA Republicans Get Ready to Gut Medicaid to Help Trump
Houthis Send Friend Request to Hegseth’s Wife Trump Urges Vatican to Select New Pope from Cast of “Fox & Friends” Harvard to Award Trump Honorary Doctorate for Making its Approval Rating Soar
Scrolling down the TNR page is a column echoing a Bluesky post from former FBI agent Asha Rangappa. She responds to a Donald Trump Truth Social spew about how we must deport “violent criminals and terrorists” without court hearings because, he claims “without exaggeration,” that doing so would take 200 years. Fail to send them all to a foreign gulag post haste and “we are not going to have a country any longer,” Trump says, replaying one of his greatest hits from at least 2015. Back then it was about securing the border. His reissue is about voiding constitutional rights.
Congress literally created an Alien Terrorist Removal Court for the expeditious removal of aliens who are designated as terrorists, under a preponderance of evidence standard.
I think problem isn’t the time it would take, but the fact that the government would have to produce actual evidence
The problem is that Mr. Truthful Hyperbole is a bit short on evidence against both Kilmar Abrego Garcia and the Fifth Amendment. Thus, the TNR subhead reads “That’s precisely why the accusations are getting wilder.” The administration admitted in court (where lying can get an attorney prosecuted and disbarred) that its whisking Abrego Garcia off to El Salvador was an “administrative error.” But since mini-Roy Cohn never admits an error, outside of court Trump lackeys simply raise the ante.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt doubled down, not only insisting that Abrego Garcia was “a foreign terrorist and an MS-13 gang member” but even accusing him of “human trafficking”—a wild new claim.
[..]
The day after Leavitt’s vile accusation in the White House press room, the Department of Homeland Security issued an elaborate press release purporting to provide records of Abrego Garcia’s wrongdoing, writing that “intelligence reports found that he was involved in human trafficking.” The basis for this report, apparently first generated on April 17, was a traffic stop in Tennessee in 2022, after which Abrego Garcia was sent on his way with a verbal warning about his expired license. No suspected trafficking was reported by the state trooper on the scene. DHS called this a “bombshell” report. “The facts speak for themselves, and they reek of human trafficking,” Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said of the report. Abrego Garcia’s wife said he was likely just driving people to construction sites for work, as he often had. This is extremely thin stuff for a trafficking accusation.
So why did the administration suddenly layer on a new allegation? It’s part of a broader escalation. Around the same time, Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Fox, “Every liberal journalist who has called him a ‘Maryland man’ and saying he was rightfully in this country should be apologizing tonight to President Trump.”
Kneel before Zod, you worms!
Then on April 18 Trump posted a badly doctored photo purporting to show Abrego Garcia’s hand with “MS-13 tattooed on his knuckles.” Gives ham-fisted a new meaning, doesn’t it? Trump 2.0 is turning reality on its head.
The courts are not immune to this bullshit but are still resistant to it. Grant notes that “the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a ‘blistering‘ order against Trump and Abrego Garcia’s removal.” Bullshit detecting is their business, after all.
Trump 2.0 “underestimated how many people would refuse to go along” with his campaign of terror against immigrants, explains Grant. “Every day they have to hear demands to bring Abrego Garcia home makes their lies about him less powerful.” The whole thing would make great satire if it weren’t also true that Trump’s terror campaign is worldwide.
When Haitians were the scapegoats du jour, Trump brayed, “They’re eating the dogs … they’re eating the cats.” Trump is stealing Borowitz’s act. Headlines since he took office demonstrate that. Except he’s not acting.
The massive public protests against Trump are not just about his assault on immigrants or on reality. Protesters presume the constitutional rights of all Americans are next. Because where will Stephen Miller turn once he runs out of noncitizens to gulag?
Every single January 6th defendant got full due process. Only the most violent people who assaulted police officers weren’t released pending trial. They had lawyers and access to all the evidence. Those who chose to plead innocent had full trials by jury and were allowed to present evidence at their sentencing. None of them were abducted off the street with no notice, sent to secret detention and shipped off to foreign gulag never to be seen again.
Stephen Miller is even more demented than Trump but that’s not saying much. I sometimes worry that he’s so out of control he could do something truly crazy although I can’t honestly think of anything worse than what he’s doing already. He is truly nuts.
Poor Bill Maher didn’t see this coming. But he should have …
Imagine my surprise when in the spring of 1939 a letter arrived at my house inviting me to dinner at the Old Chancellery with the world’s most reviled man, Adolf Hitler. I had been a vocal critic of his on the radio from the beginning, pretty much predicting everything he was going to do on the road to dictatorship. No one I knew encouraged me to go. “He’s Hitler. He’s a monster.” But eventually I concluded that hate gets us nowhere. I knew I couldn’t change his views, but we need to talk to the other side — even if it has invaded and annexed other countries and committed unspeakable crimes against humanity.
Two weeks later, I found myself on the front steps of the Old Chancellery and was led into an opulent living room, where a few of the Führer’s most vocal supporters had gathered: Himmler, Göring, Leni Riefenstahl and the Duke of Windsor, formerly King Edward VIII. We talked about some of the beautiful art on the walls that had been taken from the homes of Jews. But our conversation ended abruptly when we heard loud footsteps coming down the hallway. Everyone stiffened as Hitler entered the room.
He was wearing a tan suit with a swastika armband and gave me an enthusiastic greeting that caught me off guard. Frankly, it was a warmer greeting than I normally get from my parents, and it was accompanied by a slap on my back. I found the whole thing quite disarming. I joked that I was surprised to see him in a tan suit because if he wore that out, it would be perceived as un-Führer-like. That amused him to no end, and I realized I’d never seen him laugh before. Suddenly he seemed so human. Here I was, prepared to meet Hitler, the one I’d seen and heard — the public Hitler. But this private Hitler was a completely different animal. And oddly enough, this one seemed more authentic, like this was the real Hitler. The whole thing had my head spinning.
I particularly like that he got the utter naivete of Maher’s assumption that Trump was the “real him” in private. It didn’t occur to him that Trump was putting him on? So much for Maher’s alleged hardboiled realism.
Josh is creative and I think these two ideas are just excellent. We are essentially fighting an information war with the right in which reality is being subsumed by the cacophony of lies and propaganda generated by the right. It’s a problem. Here are a couple of easy ways to combat it:
Since January 20th, and actually back into November, I’ve had a series of projects I’ve desperately wanted to see done. My first was a simple but clean and easily shareable site to track core economic statistics from the end of the Biden administration through Trump’s presidency. Simple, objective, core economic data — here’s where Biden left off, here’s where Trump is. At the time I envisioned a different start to the administration. I figured it would be like 2017 where Trump took the quite good economy he inherited, mostly left it alone, maybe juiced it with tax cuts and rebranded it as his own. I was pretty confident this was a good bet since most of the Biden numbers were about as good as they could be. For employment, inflation, growth they would be pretty hard to top. So there wasn’t much chance Trump would end up looking much better than Biden. You simply can’t get unemployment much lower than 3%. I saw it as a way of deflating what I figured would be the standard Trumpian rebrand, where he talked constantly of the catastrophic Biden economy and his own era of prosperity with data that was actually marginally worse.
Needless to say, things have played out a bit differently. But it seems even more important now. And to be clear, what I envisioned wasn’t just pulling these numbers out of the dense or un-user friendly Fed or Commerce Department websites but making the comparisons immediate, intuitive and above all shareable. We exist in many overlapping worlds of social and influencer ecosystems. Share buttons are nice. But what you really want is the ability to, with a couple clicks, create a shareable image — memes — you can push out across social ecosystems. Ideally you want different versions that use the visual idioms that are native to certain platforms — Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, etc.
I still want to create that or convince someone else to do it. Well executed, these things are vastly more powerful than things that much more money is spent on. That is especially the case when they play into or provide idea structures with which to understand things people are seeing and feeling. If people start seeing prices go up, they’ll be looking for explanations for why. We hear a lot about how the information space is heavily weighted toward the right today. And that’s true. But thinking that can also be a crutch. It’s overstated, even more it’s significance and permanence are overstated. Things can change very quickly when what people hear doesn’t match with their lived experience.
All this endless throat-clearing leads me to my new idea. You hear constantly about all the law breaking being done by DOGE and other parts of the Trump administration. It’s true. Whole departments get shut down in defiance of congressional statutes, laws about information privacy are being broken right and left. There are endless numbers of insider deals and sweetheart contracts being doled out. We see again and again where people say if there were a functioning Justice Department this or that would have triggered an investigation. But in politics, and really in all life, things that are vague are meaningless. They are too inchoate or uncertain to drive action. They can’t be pieced together with other hard facts to assemble anything of consequence. As we see them at present, they end up as little more than background noise.
Here’s what I envision — a small group of researchers and lawyers, let’s call them the DOJ in Exile. This small office I’ve created pulls together all these stories and all those to come. My team orders them into things that are awful but simply not part of the criminal law, those that could be prosecuted with creative but serious-minded uses of available statutes and those which appear to involve straightforward criminal conduct. Then they break them down into specific statutes. They name names. They can produce what amount to indictments in waiting. I could go through many more permutations here. But the concept and question is what would a real Justice Department be doing right now? Since it’s not a real Justice Department with the ability to compel testimony, make arrests and bring criminal charges, we don’t have the need for secrecy. You can discuss and publicize what you’re finding.
Needless to say, my small team would be minuscule compared to the Public Integrity Section of the DOJ. But they could do quite a lot. And, to be clear, I don’t envision going out and generating new facts. I imagine working primarily from credible published accounts of what has happened. There’s quite a lot you can learn by carefully sifting through publicly available information. A real investigation would need to validate and confirm these details in ways that would hold up in court. That’s fine. The point of the exercise is to provide an outline and a guide to probable, credible outcomes.
This seems obvious once you think about it. As Marshall says, there’s good reason to think it could be meaningful:
Quotes from former prosecutors saying that this or that is probably illegal or would have prompted an investigation in the past is all meaningless. You need to make it concrete and specific. You put the arguments on paper in ways that can be validated or disputed by other people knowledgeable about the law. You provide details which people can use to make public arguments. As much as anything, you provide a sense of scale. Firm it all up, package it all together, make it possible for the average person to leaf through and see what’s happening — that’s profoundly important and valuable.
The second point is that it keeps some public and prosecutorial memory. This administration won’t be in power forever. Very high on the list for any successor administration will be to avoid the mistakes of the Biden administration. Lack of accountability and consequences spurs even greater levels of lawbreaking. It will be a record and a guide which future prosecutors can consult.
The third and closely related point is deterrence. People are doing anything and everything right now. They’re not necessarily the worst things but some of the clearest criminal conduct is taking place with contracting and sharing of people’s private data which the government collects for one and only one purpose. Insider trading is another massive area of possibilities.
Personally, I think the second is the most powerful. There is a real danger that the memory of what used to be considered the rule of law and the norms that buttress it being lost. It’s been 10 years of degradation already.
I would suggest that a project like this could be taken up for the medical research that’s being flushed down the toilet as well. I certainly hope that the scientists who are being dismissed have at least taken personal custody of their data. The losses in that regard are liable to be catastrophic if these monsters get away with this.
I urge you to read the whole thing. He provides a lot more detail and a thorough rationale. If you are or know someone who is capable of doing something like this I would suggest you go for it.
The World Food Programme suspended malnutrition treatment for 650,000 malnourished women and children in Ethiopia this week due to severe funding shortages, the U.N. agency said, with millions more at risk of losing access to aid.
WFP gets financing from 15-20 donors including the United States but many of them have cut funding this year, said Zlatan Milisic, WFP Country Director in Ethiopia. The agency has received exemptions from U.S. President Donald Trump’s aid freeze that has disrupted humanitarian work around the world, he added, but little for 2025 so far.
We keep hearing about “exemptions” and DOGE restoring people and grants but they never seem to actually materialize. People are already getting sick from the lack of HIV meds and now we are allowing children to starve because Trump and Musk are immoral imbeciles.
Apparently Bessent has been begging him to stop but he just can’t help himself. This is from last week:
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has repeatedly cautioned White House officials that any attempt to fire Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell would risk destabilizing financial markets, according to two people close to the White House granted anonymity to share details of private discussions.
Bessent’s private message reinforces what President Donald Trump already knows but comes as the president’s anger with the Fed chair is growing because Powell hasn’t shown signs that he will cut interest rates soon. It also comes against the backdrop of widespread market turmoil over the administration’s far-reaching trade war.
Trump’s fury with Powell burst into public view on Thursday morning, when he said in a post on Truth Social that his “termination cannot come fast enough!”
Any attempt to remove Powell — a legally questionable option Trump considered in his first term — would feed instability in markets already woozy from the recent tariff whiplash. Investor confidence that the central bank will make decisions based on the path of the economy rather than on short-term politics is a key underpinning of the U.S.’s global financial reputation.
“I don’t think he’ll do it but frankly this is a grenade with the pin pulled,” said one person familiar with the situation, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly, referring to the president’s longstanding frustrations with Powell, “so there are no guarantees.”
Great.
According to all the financial pundits, this drop today is entirely because of Trump’s comments.
I posted this earlier but it’s worth doing again because it’s so important. Krugman on the threat:
… we really, really don’t want someone that crazy dictating monetary policy.
The reason we don’t want politicians in direct control of monetary policy is that it’s so easy to use. After all, what does it mean to “ease” monetary policy? It’s an incredibly frictionless process. Normally the Federal Open Market Committee tells the New York Fed to buy U.S. government debt from private banks, which it does with money conjured out of thin air. There’s no need to pass legislation, place bids with contractors, deal with any of the hassles usually associated with changes in government policy. Basically the Fed can create an economic boom with a phone call.
It’s obvious that this kind of power could be abused by an irresponsible leader who wants to preside over an economic boom and doesn’t want to hear about the risks. This isn’t a hypothetical scenario. Consider what happened in Turkey, whose Trump-like president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, recently arrested the leader of the opposition. When the global post-Covid inflation shock hit, Erdogan embraced crank economic theories. He forced Turkey’s central bank, its equivalent of the Fed, to cut interest rates in the belief, contrary to standard economics, that doing so would reduce, not increase inflation. You can see the results in the chart at the top of this post.
How can we guard against that kind of policy irresponsibility? After the stagflation of the 1970s many countries delegated monetary policy to technocrats at independent central banks. Can the technocrats get it wrong? Of course they can and often have. But they’re less likely to engage in wishful thinking and motivated reasoning than typical politicians, let alone politicians like Trump.
What makes Trump’s attempt to bully the Fed especially ominous is the fact that the Fed will soon have to cope with the stagflationary crisis Trump has created. Trump’s massive tariff increase will lead to a major inflationary shock:
Moreover, Trump has also created huge uncertainty by radically changing his policies every few days, which will depress spending and may well cause a recession:
Not incidentally, Trump has been able to pursue these destructive policies because U.S. law gives the president enormous discretionary power over tariffs. And now he wants the same kind of discretionary power over the Fed.
As a consequence of Trump’s destructive tariff regime, the Fed will soon face a dilemma. Should it raise interest rates to fight inflation, or should it cut rates to fight recession? It’s a really hard call, and it’s quite possible that Jay Powell will get it wrong. Trump has made Powell’s dilemma even worse with his attempted bullying, because a rate cut would be seen by many as a sign that Powell is giving in to avoid being fired.
But one thing we know for sure is that we don’t want Trump making that call. Like Erdogan, he has embraced crank economic doctrines to justify his policies, in Trump’s case the ludicrous claim that tariffs won’t raise consumer prices. Does anyone doubt that when inflation rises, he’ll dismiss it as “fake news”?
No, no, no…
Trump has been cowed by the financial markets up until now. But he’s not entirely sane I don’t trust that he won’t do it if Navarro or some other nut advises him to go for it. As his dementia creeps in he’s more and more prone to impulsivity.
(@ArtCandee) 
