Labor Historian Eric Loomis was asked to give a letter grade to Joe Biden’s administration on labor policy. Biden makes the honor roll:
Joe Biden has pledged repeatedly to go further than any of his predecessors with his support for U.S. labor rights.
“I intend to be the most pro-union president leading the most pro-union administration in American history,” Biden said at a White House meeting in September 2021 that brought together ordinary workers, labor leaders and government officials.
He has expressed this intention many times, sometimes clarifying his goals.
He goes on to lay out all the positive things Biden has done for labor and raises the one case (the railroad union’s sick leave demands — which they later mostly got) as the single bad policy. It’s quite astonishing and I honestly didn’t realize most of it. He also analyzes the context in which he’s operating with the congress and the courts and it’s actually even more astonishing. Great read.
Anybody telling you “this is normal” is hindering you from prioritising more time with your loved ones as the planet overheats.pic.twitter.com/w1EiVemuNm
Why are we seeing flooding all over the world now?
Boil some soup. Pour into a bowl. Wrap bowl in Saran. Watch condensation form, & drip down. Welcome to our CO2-filled atmosphere.
Kids, there is nothing on this earth more important than doing everything possible to get the governments around the world to take action on climate change. I’m old and I’ll be dead before too long. But this is going to change everything for the worse in the world you are going to be living in. This is literally an existential threat to life on earth.
Outside Trump Trial: Nearly 100 pink penis shaped balloons with faces of Judge Juan Merchan, Alvin Bragg, Jack Smith and Judge Arthur Engoron taped to them released in front of NYC courthouse.
The gathered GOP congressional allies of Donald Trump took no questions from the assembled press. They each made statements attacking a collection of Judge Merchan’s family, Michael Cohen & Stormy Daniels.
Maybe it’s just me but I feel as if things are hurtling even more out of control than they have been. The shamelessness is turning into recklessness. The question is whether anyone cares.
Trump has been taunting Biden to debate repeatedly saying, “anytime, anywhere.” Now his minions and mouthpieces are having a little meltdown because Biden accepted:
The first debate is set for next month on CNN, while the second is planned for September on ABC.
Though the GOP’s presumptive presidential nominee has also pushed for a Fox News debate, the Democratic incumbent hasn’t agreed to that ― and the network’s hosts are in meltdown mode as a result.
Sean Hannity criticized CNN’s Jake Tapper, who is set to be one of the debate moderators, by calling him a “radical left-wing partisan.” Hannity demanded that moderators’ mics get cut off after asking Trump questions, and he also launched into some wild conspiracy theories about Biden.
He claimed that Biden will take a “heavy dose” of “whatever he took before the State of the Union” address to win the debates. He further suggested that Biden is “secretly” trying to get out of the debates.
In fact, they’ve completely lost what’s left of their minds
Ingraham: All Trump has to do is stay calm during the entire debate and let Biden rant and rave because he is sounding meaner by the day. Trump, by comparison, he easily appears presidential, cool, confident pic.twitter.com/blZEoXGbXD
I used to think this was an act but I’m beginning to think they really mean it. Listening to Mike Johnson over the course of the last few days flagrantly lying in full blown Trumpian fashion tells me that they’ve been completely absorbed now into the MAGA Bizarroworld. I think they’ve come to believe their own bullshit.
The North Carolina Senate Judiciary Committee approved an amended version of House Bill 237 on Tuesday morning that would prohibit the wearing of masks in public.
The controversial bill, which would also increase criminal penalties for those who commit crimes while wearing a mask in public, comes in the wake of protests that have erupted on college campuses across the country in response to the Israel-Hamas conflict.
Gotta nip that in the bud, as Deputy Fife would say up the road in Mayberry.
Laws dating back to the 1950s that were enacted, at least in part, as responses to groups like the Ku Klux Klan, prohibit wearing a mask in public in North Carolina, with exceptions. Those exceptions were expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic to include people wearing masks for health reasons. Newton’s bill would remove that specific exception.
They’re just rolling back the law to what it was before COVID, dontcha know.
Under Article 4A of Chapter 14 of the General Statutes, Prohibited Secret Societies and Activities, it is generally a crime for an individual to wear a mask in public. However, under G.S. 14-12.11(a)(6), an individual can wear a mask in public for the physical health or safety of the wearer or others. If an individual wears a mask in public for health or safety reasons, a law enforcement officer can require the individual to remove the mask during traffic stops and criminal investigations when the officer has reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
Section 1 of the PCS would repeal G.S. 14-12.11(a)(6), and individuals would no longer be able to wear masks in public for health or safety reasons.
Sen. Sydney Batch (D-Wake), a cancer survivor immunocompromised during medical treatment, objected:
“My issue is that we are removing the specific section that gave people who are immunocompromised or people who were sick and just care about the community. Someone walking around with tuberculosis, wants to wear a mask to protect everybody else is no longer able to do that based on this bill.”
“No one wants to see a grandmother arrested for wearing a mask. The fact, though, is that this would criminalize that process,” said Sen. Natasha Marcus (D-Mecklenburg), adding that wearing a mask in public is life-or-death for some people. “Stated plainly, your bill will make it illegal,” Marcus added.
When Batch offered an amendment to add back the health exemption, Republicans tabled it on a party-line vote. The bill later passed the state Senate, also along party lines.
“Republicans are putting cancer patients, seniors, & folks with disabilities at risk of punishment for wearing protective masks they require when they go out in public,” tweeted Democrats’ state chair Anderson Clayton.
The bill heads to Gov. Roy Cooper’s (D) desk where he is expected to veto it. But with a GOP supermajority, Republicans will likely override it.
“At least 32 people have died in Somalia after drinking water from a well that was believed to have been poisoned.” Gulf Times, 2017. Photo for illustration, UNHCR/F.Courbet
Among would-be Rambos who fancy themselves patriots, artifacts from the American Revolution serve to justify, well, whatever antisocial, anti-American behavior needs justifying. Sacking the U.S. Capitol comes to mind. They’ll wave Gadsden flags and sport tee shirts citing Thomas Jefferson’s “the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.” Etc.
But when they’re not sacking capitols and bear-spraying police, and when their crooked lawyers are not working to overturn elections that don’t go their way, these miscreants employ a more ancient tradition: poisoning the well. Smithsonian Magazine provides a thumbnail history of “an early form of biological warfare,” the practice of belligerents as ancient as the Sumerians and as recent as the IsraeliArmy and ISIS iterally poisoning wells to inflict suffering on civilians. RationalWiki describes metaphorically poisoning the well as “a rhetorical technique and logical fallacy that uses the association of negative emotions to distract a subject from actual evidence in an argument,” adding, “Poisoning the well is an appeal to hate.”
Brother, do many on the right hate the country they claim so loudly to love. Abusive men, take note, the Republican Party is acting out one of those dreary murder ballads with America. If they can’t have her, nobody can.
Robert Reich sees in Donald Trump’s criminal trial in Manhattan how thoroughly the right has poisoned the well of democracy by undermining human decency. He finds no one admirable in the Donald-Michael-Allen-Stormy-David saga revealed in court testimony. What has our American experiment in self-government come to when so many from MAGA foot soldiers to presidents and Supreme Court justices lack the basic honor and integrity to conduct it as intended?
This cast of characters — and there are many, many others like them in Trump world — are loathsome not because they have violated the law, but because they have contributed to creating a harsh society in which everyone is potentially bought or sold.
It’s a sell-or-tell society, a catch-and-kill society, a just-take-care-of-it society. A society where money and power are the only considerations. Where honor and integrity count for nothing.
I am not naive about how the world works. I’ve spent years in Washington, many of them around powerful people. I have seen the seamy side of American politics and business.
But the people who inhabit Trump world live in a more extreme place — where there are no norms, no standards of decency, no common good. There are only opportunities to make money off others and potential dangers of being ripped off by others.
When most sites where you might read this see you only as data to be mined, your humanity has been stripped. You’ve been reduced to a commodity to be bought and sold. Nothing more.
“Woke” is Republican-speak for those of us who believe every America adult should have a voice in the electoral process of this nation, for people who don’t believe a human being’s body, gender identity, or sexual orientation are anyone else’s business, for we who are sickened at the violence against the Asian community: the direct result of the irresponsible rhetoric of a Republican president, for Americans who are disgusted that a cancer diagnosis now often necessitates a gofundme page, because we are making illness a financial death sentence, for people who will not abide the assassination of unarmed people of color by members of a police force infected with white supremacy, for those who grieve the way this nation is ravaged by preventable gun violence because those who profit from it have such a stranglehold on our lawmakers— for those of us who exhibit the slightest empathy whatsoever toward migrant families or the working poor or people of color, when we see how hostile our nation has been to them and how oppressive it still is.
It’s woke to want fair elections. It’s woke to be anti-racist. It’s woke to be anti-fascist. It’s woke to trust Science. It’s woke to wear a mask in a pandemic. It’s woke to be the parent of a bullied child. It’s woke to want to be addressed with the gender you identify with. It’s woke to want a less-polluted community.
Anything that brings equity gets this label from the Right because inequity is its only goal.
Their goal is not to water the tree of liberty. Their goal is to poison the well of democracy, to render it unusable by the rest of us who share this land, to sabotage its very foundations.
The rule of law is one of those foundations. Equal justice under law is on trial in Manhattan (and in pending Trump cases).
See the New York Times this morning for what it looks like in the West Bank where the law protects the lawless but not the disfavored, where lawbreakers become lawmakers:
The two-tier situation has only become worse during the past year. We scrutinized a sample of three dozen cases from the West Bank since Oct. 7 that shows how much the legal system has decayed. In cases ranging from stealing livestock to arson to violent assault, not a single suspect was charged with a crime; in one case, a settler shot a Palestinian in the stomach while an Israel Defense Forces soldier looked on, yet the police questioned the shooter for only 20 minutes and never as a criminal suspect.
Where does the extremist right mean to take the United States? Behold the template:
In the West Bank, a new generation of ultranationalists has taken an even more radical turn against the very notion of a democratic Israeli state. Their objective is to tear down Israel’s institutions and to establish “Jewish rule”: anointing a king, building a temple in place of the Jerusalem mosques sacred to Muslims worldwide, imposing a religious regime on all Jews.
I noted last week that Bolts magazine was featuring a reader Q&A with an election law expert and they have published some of them today. It’s quite interesting even if a little bit depressing. But we’re used to that when it comes to this subject.
Here’s one example:
What’s the most underrated case where this court weakened voting rights, but that we just don’t talk about enough? — Anonymous
There are two cases that hardly anyone has heard of but that have had a major impact on the way the Supreme Court treats the constitutional right to vote: Anderson v. Celebrezze, in 1983, and Burdick v. Takushi, in 1992. Anderson dealt with the desire of an independent candidate to gain ballot access after a state’s deadline for turning in enough signatures. Burdick was about an individual’s attempt to write-in a candidate instead of choosing one of the candidates listed on the ballot. (These two cases are the subjects of Chapters 1 and 2 of my new book.) But the specific disputes in these cases are less important than the judicial test that came out of them.
These two cases began the Supreme Court’s descent into its underprotection of the right to vote by failing to apply the highest judicial standard, known as strict scrutiny.
Previously, the court in the 1960s had strongly protected voters by requiring a state to prove that it had a really good reason for a law that infringed upon the right to vote, and that the law actually achieved that goal. But in Anderson, the court began to weaken that test, instead balancing the burden that a law imposes on voters with a state’s interests in regulating the election as it wishes. Burdick went further, accepting a state’s desire to run its election as it sees fit. These two cases comprise what election scholars call the “Anderson–Burdick” balancing test.
Now, states no longer have to explain, with specificity, their reasons for a law to have the Supreme Court uphold its voting regulation. As far as this court is concerned, a state can simply offer a more general assertion that it’s looking to “prevent voter fraud” or “ease election administration,” even when doing so is at the expense of voters’ easy access to the ballot.
Check out the full Q&A if you are interested in this subject. This Court is fully engaged in the right’s assault on democracy — and they’ve been playing a very long game.
Remember, the only reason they are so intent upon doing this is because they know they are on the wrong side of history, the party of the wealthy, landowning class, and will not win if everyone has a right to vote and exercises it. They’re been trying to ensure that doesn’t happen since the founding of the republic.
Just today:
#BREAKING: #SCOTUS issues stays in Louisiana congressional redistricting case; clears way for second majority-minority House district in 2024 election.
The three Democratic appointees publicly dissent, with Justice Jackson worrying about the apparent expansion of Purcell. pic.twitter.com/QXrbQwY7YS
In the past, Family Research Council, founded in 1983 by Focus on the Family, and Concerned Women for America, founded in 1978 by the late Beverly LaHaye, both endorsed Greene 100% and applauded her for her work opposing LGBTQ rights and other issues.
Now, both groups are criticizing Greene’s latest “bizarre conundrum”: the effort to take down House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has a long association with their movement.
“Stop the madness,” said FRC President Tony Perkins in the organization’s The Washington Stand, which says it provides “news and commentary from a biblical worldview.”
“I thought the goal of government was to work for the people — not just take political pot shots at the other party,” said Perkins, who has mentored Johnson for decades.
FRC criticized Greene as well as the 10 Republicans who supported her latest effort to oust Johnson, calling them “the irrational wing of the GOP,” “GOP rebels,” “attention seekers” and “rogue members” and blaming their “selfish ploy” for the House’s “disruption and chaos,” “soap opera” and “kindergarten atmosphere.”
“Strangely enough, Democrats seem to be the reasonable party here,” said the Washington Stand in March. The outlet’s articles run in other conservative outlets, including the American Family Association’s The Stand and The Patriot Post.
— Carl Quintanilla (@carlquintanilla) May 15, 2024
Four years ago, this was what Trump told people. He says the same thing today and is never quizzed by anyone about how he justifies saying it considering how wrong he was. The one rationalization he gives is that the markets are up in anticipation of his win and that he hopes they crash before he becomes president again because he doesn’t want to be Herbert Hoover.
Trump in 2020: You have 401ks? Oh, you’re going to only vote for Trump, because otherwise, those 401(k)s are going to be worthless. That’s a big incentive
(The Dow just hit 40,000 for the first time ever in history under President Biden) pic.twitter.com/4vz16ghDPy
Led by lower food and auto prices, inflation in the United States cooled slightly last month after three elevated readings, likely offering a tentative sigh of relief for officials at the Federal Reserve as well as President Joe Biden’s re-election team.
Consumer prices rose 0.3% from March to April, the Labor Department said Wednesday, down slightly from 0.4% the previous month. Measured year-over-year, inflation ticked down from 3.5% to 3.4%. And a gauge of underlying inflation, which excludes volatile food and energy costs, reached its lowest level in three years…..
……Wednesday’s report provides a dose of reassurance that the pace of price increases may be resuming its slowdown. While the latest figures show inflation still well above the Fed’s 2% target, it’s the first time this year that the year-over-year figure has declined. And price increases cooled in some service industries, such as hotels, health care and auto repairs, that had previously kept inflation elevated.
The report “was a tiny step in the right direction,” said Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com. “The fight against inflation is not yet over, but the worsening trend observed in the first quarter of 2024 may have ended……
…..Among individual items in April, grocery prices slipped, providing a break to shoppers. Egg prices, which have been volatile after a bout of avian flu, fell 7.3%. New and used car prices also dropped. By contrast, prices for gas and clothing both jumped.
Will anyone notice or are Americans in such a funk that they can’t see it? Someday they will, of course. The question is whether it will be in time to help Joe Biden or will they vote for Trump and give him all the credit?
