Like many of you, I watched the debate tonight. If you haven’t already, now is a great time to do your research on the issues at hand and the stances these candidates take on the topics that matter to you the most. As a voter, I make sure to watch and read everything I can about their proposed policies and plans for this country.
Recently I was made aware that AI of ‘me’ falsely endorsing Donald Trump’s presidential run was posted to his site. It really conjured up my fears around AI, and the dangers of spreading misinformation. It brought me to the conclusion that I need to be very transparent about my actual plans for this election as a voter. The simplest way to combat misinformation is with the truth.
I will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election. I’m voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them. I think she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos. I was so heartened and impressed by her selection of running mate @timwalz, who has been standing up for LGBTQ+ rights, IVF, and a woman’s right to her own body for decades.
I’ve done my research, and I’ve made my choice. Your research is all yours to do, and the choice is yours to make. I also want to say, especially to first time voters: Remember that in order to vote, you have to be registered! I also find it’s much easier to vote early. I’ll link where to register and find early voting dates and info in my story.
With love and hope,
Taylor Swift Childless Cat Lady
Her timing was puuuuurfect. Will it make a difference? Yes:
As my friend @taylorswift13 so eloquently stated, now is the time to research and choose the candidate that speaks to you and your beliefs. Only 54 days left until the election. Make sure you are registered to vote! Your vote in this election may be one of the most important… pic.twitter.com/hN9OaBfH2Z
Kamala Harris: Donald Trump was fired by 81 million people, so let's be clear about that and clearly he is having a very difficult time processing that pic.twitter.com/3uk6VIccf1
At every moment in this short, intense campaign Kamala Harris has risen to the occasion. During the weeks of agony as President Biden and the party debated whether he could continue his campaign, she kept her head down giving him space to make his decision. But when he endorsed her moments after announcing his withdrawal from the race, she hit the ground running. Her rollout, including the choice of Tim Walz as her running mate, is widely accepted as one of the best in American political history. Her speech at the DNC was flawless. The debate last night was a home run.
She. Is. Good. Very, very good. It’s clear that she not only has good instincts, she learns from her mistakes and moves forward with confidence. She is a mature, experienced politician with a warm and engaging personality. That’s rare.
Vice President Harris: Why don't you tell the 800,000 Polish Americans right here in Pennsylvania how quickly you would give up for the sake of favor, and what you think is a friendship with a dictator who would eat you for lunch? pic.twitter.com/TzTDTh7i0n
According to the New York Times/Sienna poll released over the weekend, about 28% of people said they needed to learn more about Vice President Kamala Harris,” while only 9% said the same about Donald Trump with the race pretty much tied within the margin of error. Consequently, the conventional wisdom going into last night’s debate was that Harris had much more to lose — and gain — than Trump who is thought to have a pretty solid 46% no matter what while Harris could conceivably go up or down pretty substantially. The debate was therefore seen as make or break for her while for him it would probably change nothing. Could she rise to the occasion?
Oh yes indeed she could and she did. That 28% of people who needed to learn more, learned that Kamala Harris is quick witted, highly qualified, confident and very well prepared. Yes, she has a very winning smile and exudes a joyful radiance, but she has a spine of steel which she demonstrated for a solid hour and a half as she dominated poor, spent Donald Trump. It was hardly a fair fight.
I would imagine that even that 9% who’ve been in a coma for the past decade and needed more information about Donald Trump came away knowing everything they needed to know about him. He’s an angry, delusional man who obviously spends way too much time on Truth Social and watching Fox News. He may not know much about health care or the constitution but he’s an expert on right wing conspiracy theories which he seems to believe are absolutely true.
His favorite conspiracy theory is one which he has personally propagated: immigrants are coming to kill us all in our beds which seems to be the only thing he was really interested in talking about. In his very first answer about the economy, he said:
You see what’s happening with towns throughout the United States. You look at Springfield, Ohio. You look at Aurora in Colorado. They are taking over the towns. They’re taking over buildings. They’re going in violently. These are the people that she and Biden let into our country. And they’re destroying our country. They’re dangerous. They’re at the highest level of criminality. And we have to get them out. We have to get them out fast.
The next question was on tariffs and there was more of the same: criminal migrants pouring across the border and “she’s destroyed the country with a policy that you’d say they have to hate our country.”
A couple of questions later,after defending his crowd sizes he let fly with this:
And look at what’s happening to the towns all over the United States. And a lot of towns don’t want to talk — not going to be Aurora or Springfield. A lot of towns don’t want to talk about it because they’re so embarrassed by it. In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs. The people that came in. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating — they’re eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what’s happening in our country. And it’s a shame.
Moderator David Muir fact-checked that one saying that ABC had checked with the city of Springfield and there were no reports of immigrants eating pets. Trump said he’d seen someone on TV say that it had happened.
Omg Trump takes the bait and starts rambling about crowd sizes and repeats baseless claims about immigrants eating pets and gets fact checked
You read that right. Trump actually repeated a ridiculous internet conspiracy theory, advanced yesterday by his weird VP nominee JD Vance, that Haitian immigrants are eating residents of Springfield, Ohio’s pets. The memes had been flying all over social media and on right wing cable and apparently, like the most gullible QAnon believer, Trump took it seriously.
Some right wing commentators like Erick Erickson were not amused. He blamed the people spreading the racist meme, not Trump, who apparently has no agency at all:
It may have been the weirdest thing he said all night but it was hardly the stupidest. He also regurgitated one of his favorite conspiracy theories saying that Democrats, specifically Gov. Tim Walz, believe in executing infants after they’re born and in six states it’s legal to do so. Moderator Linsey Davis set him straight on that, not that he’ll ever stop saying it.
When asked whether he had any regrets about his behavior on January 6th, he pushed another conspiracy theory about former speaker Nancy Pelosi being responsible, which is also nonsense. The Speaker had no power to stop the insurrection that Trump incited and then sat in his office watching unfold on his big screen TV. He clearly has no regrets and went on to spew more conspiracies about Ashli Babbit, the young woman who was shot as she breached the doorway, threatening the members of congress — after which he started braying about immigrants invading the country again saying they are killing many people, “unlike J6.”
And,of course, he once more proclaimed that he didn’t lose the 2020 election, repeating the Big Lie at length. And yes, it led to immigration:
Our elections are bad. And a lot of these illegal immigrants coming in, they’re trying to get them to vote. They can’t even speak English. They don’t even know what country they’re in practically. And these people are trying to get them to vote. And that’s why they’re allowing them to come into our country.
Donald Trump’s team had been bragging all week that he didn’t need to prepare for debates the way the allegedly stupid Kamala Harris did. Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard was giving him some pointers on how to beat her and he was having some policy chats with various advisers, but that was all he needed. Well, that didn’t work out too well.
That debate was a total debacle for Donald Trump and his surrogates knew it.
In fact, he had so little trust in their ability to spin his disastrous performance that he personally went into the spin room afterwards to boldly lie to the news media and proclaim he actually won the debate, quoting silly twitter polls as proof. If it had been anyone but Trump it might have even been a little bit sad.
The usual right wing suspects are all angry at the moderators for fact checking Trump which they did three times But they could have spent hours doing that. CNN’s Daniel Dale fact checked the debate in real time and found that Trump had lied 33 times and Harris lied once. The moderators allowed Trump to jump in and speak at the end of Harris’ answers resulting in his getting five more minutes than she did. He ended up speaking 39 times while she only spoke 23 times. The problem wasn’t the moderators it was Trump’s big mouth.
Trump relentlessly hammered on migrants which will probably play well with his base, along with all the other lies and conspiracy theories, but to anyone else he sounded like a lunatic, surly, rude and out of his depth. His laziness and inability/unwillingness to learn anything new caught up with him last night. He lost this debate, as he would say, bigly.
Salon
Update:
It wuz rigged!
Donald Trump, without evidence, suggests that Kamala Harris had the questions before the debate: “They had a rigged show with somebody that maybe even had the answers…I watched her talk, and I said, you know, she seems awfully familiar with the questions.” pic.twitter.com/P3SNSBskl4
Kamala Harris is hardly the first person to observe that Donald Trump is easily manipulated with flattery. Particularly, flattery from autocrats and dictators he admires and whose respect he craves. They belong to an exclusive club he desperately wants to join, a strongman club that wouldn’t have an infant like him for a member.
He’s trying to again divide and distract from the reality, which is it is very well known that Donald Trump is weak and wrong on national security and foreign policy. It is well known that he admires dictators, wants to be a dictator on day one according to himself. It is well known that he said of Putin that he can do whatever the hell he wants and go into Ukraine. It is well known when that he said when Russia went into Ukraine it was brilliant. It is well known he exchanged love letters with Kim Jong un. And it is absolutely well known that these dictators and autocrats are rooting for you to be president again because they’re so clear, they can manipulate you with flattery and favors.
But flattery and favors are not the only ways Trump is easily manipulated. Time and again in last night’s 90 minutes, Harris baited traps for Trump, and he walked straight into them.
Over the course of almost two hours Tuesday night, the Vice President effectively needled the former President on his deepest insecurities while painting a clear choice for voters. Trump in response repeatedly took the bait and doubled down, leading him to go on wild tangents, engage in angry outbursts, and relitigate old battles. It was a striking dichotomy for voters to take in from two figures who share so little when it comes to political instinct, personalities, and even personal discipline. Harris leveraged Trump’s total lack of that last element to set the agenda for the evening.
When Trump boasted about receiving 75 million votes in 2020 and complained about alleged irregularities in Georgia, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, Harris pounced.:
“Donald Trump was fired by 81 million people. So, let’s be clear about that. And clearly, he is having a very difficult time processing that.” World leaders, Harris said, “are laughing at Donald Trump.”
Trump responded by citing Hungarian autocrat Viktor Orbán as a character reference.
Harris invited people to attend Trump’s rallies and watch him babble about
…. fictional characters like Hannibal Lecter. He will talk about windmills cause cancer. And what you will also notice is that people start leaving his rallies early out of exhaustion and boredom. And I will tell you the one thing you will not hear him talk about is you. You will not hear him talk about your needs, your dreams, and your, your desires. And I’ll tell you, I believe you deserve a president who actually puts you first. And I pledge to you that I will.
Trump took the bait again (Time again):
Then he puffed up his political chest: “People don’t leave my rallies. We have the biggest rallies, the most incredible rallies in the history of politics.” The dispute was completely immaterial for undecided voters and would win him zero new votes, but Harris understood exactly what she had done: in inviting Trump’s ego to overtake actual issues, she was showing his pettiness in full display. And, for millions of voters watching Harris in such an environment for the first time, it’s impossible to imagine a better first showing.
What Harris showed (after a shaky first few minutes) was that she was in control in that space and Trump was not. Trump charged that Democrats threw Biden out of the campaign “like a dog.” Harris led Trump around like Pavlov’s. And she didn’t do it with flattery like Trump’s dictator pals. She pressed his buttons and he salivated.
There was only one leader on the stage last night.
You can’t unsee it. Donald Trump last night bested Joe Biden with a Grandpa Simpsonesque debate performance even more unsettling against Vice President Kamala Harris. If Trump’s goal was to be best of the worst, congratulations, Donald, you did it.
Trump made at least 33 false claims during the debate, fact-checker Daniel Dale told CNN viewers Tuesday night. But that’s not the point anymore. Facts have never mattered to Trump, nor to his MAGA cult. As Maya Angelou said, “I’ve learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel.”
How did they feel about seeing Trump afraid even to look at Harris?
How did Americans feel about Harris pledging to fight for them, all of them, while Trump whined about his crowd size?
How did they feel about Trump citing Viktor Orbán, the autocratic prime minister of Hungary, as a character reference?
There were too many memorable moments to review. Too many Harris zingers and Trump belly flops. But I’m reminded of Gov. Tim Walz telling an audience: Who is asking for for the agenda Trump and Republicans advocate? For more tax cuts for the rich? To shred the social safety net and take away more of our freedoms, etc.?
More to the point after last night, who is asking for four more years of Trumpism? Who is asking for four more years of race-baiting? Who is asking for four more years of this kind of insanity? How did they feel about this?
This is the moment when Trump left ZERO doubt that his mind is in a state of rapid deterioration: "In Springfield, they’re eating the dogs, the people that came in, they’re eating the cats, they’re eating the pets of the people that live there." pic.twitter.com/5T5oKxxyZz
Shortly after the debate, a famous “childless cat lady” who sings endorsed Harris in a cogent Instagram statement while urging Americans to register and vote.
Loomer, a far-right activist and former Republican congressional candidate, has plenty of evidence that Trump likes her. There are all the times he’s boosted her videos on Truth Social. There was the event last summer, at Trump’s New Jersey golf club, when the former president spotted Loomer on the rope line and invited her onto his private balcony. There was the shout-out at a rally in Iowa, in January, when Trump praised her as “a very important person, politically.” There were the former president’s invitations to fly on Trump Force One, his Boeing 757 — Loomer remembers being a passenger three times, Trump aides recall only two — bobbing along to Sinéad O’Connor’s “Nothing Compares 2 U”en route from Palm Beach to Des Moines last January. There’s also the fact that Trump reportedly wanted to hire her for a campaign role last spring,before aide sintervened.
So she’s been working toward a second coming of Trump on her own, as something of a cheerleader-slash-opposition researcher. Loomer has made Trump’s causes her own since 2015, when Trumpaccused Mexico of sending “rapists” across the border and called for a “complete and total shutdown” of Muslims entering the United States. That kind of incendiary rhetoric didn’t keep Trump out of the White House, but Loomer’s anti-Islam utterances, among other alleged terms-of-use violations, cost her access to Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. She can’t use Lyft or Uber (including Uber Eats) because she criticized the companies for employing “Islamic immigrant driver[s].” (“I’m not anti-Muslim,” she told me, “but I am anti-Islam.”) She claims PayPal, Venmo, Cash App and GoFundMe also booted her.
None of this has chastened Loomer, who maintains she’s done nothing wrong. “I actually collect Mohammed cartoons,” she told me at one point, referring to the prophet of Islam,the depiction of whom is considered offensive among Muslims. She hasa copy of a January 2015 cover of Charlie Hebdo — the one depicting a tearful Mohammed, published in the aftermath of the terrorist attack on the headquarters of the French satirical magazine. “It’s iconic,” she says of the magazine cover. “It’s about free speech. It’s a testament to how barbaric Islam is.”
Loomer is too much for even her ostensible allies in the MAGA-friendly media to stomach. She often claims Fox News has blacklisted her andlaments that the right-wing media personalities of Turning Point USA and the Daily Wire don’t invite her on their shows — even though they’re quick to applaud her handiwork online. A Fox News spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment; a spokesperson for Turning Point USA said that Loomer has attended their events and that hosts have shared her reporting. In a recent post on X, Daily Wire CEO Jeremy Boreing called Loomer “occasionally effective,” if also “occasionally hyperbolic” and “prone to seeing correlation as causation and connection as conspiracy.”
[…]
“I get calls all the time — from our allies in the House, for example — ‘How can you have that sewer rat on?’” says Stephen K. Bannon, the MAGA field general and “War Room” podcast host,of Loomer.
“Laura Loomer is a political science experiment gone wrong,” says Peter Schorsch, a former Republican operative who now runs the website Florida Politics. “She’s what happens when you take a gadfly and inject it with that radioactive waste from Godzilla.” “Some people say, ‘Oh, Laura has a personality disorder,’” Loomer says. “I don’t. I just don’t like how disloyal people are.”
But never mind all that, because Trump himself likes her — which makes her,potentially, a player. A person of relevance. An influential figure, despite it all. The presumptive Republican nominee for president “appreciates her fearlessness and tenacity,” according to a senior Trump campaign aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters.
She is a player.
Oh my dear God.
Just a few weeks ago, Loomer called Harris "a brain-dead bimbo who sucked so much c**k in order to get to the political position that she's in today."
Rebecca Traister has written an inspiring feature about the Harris candidacy that you don’t want to miss. She talks about the fact that the burst of enthusiasm around her candidacy was fuelled almost entirely by the grassroots, much of it led by women, especially Black women’s groups that have been around awhile, quietly going about the business of electing Democrats.
She writes:
As we settle into the second phase of this candidacy and old hands regain control in preparation for the presidential debate on September 10, the question is whether the cautious, moderating forces that have long guided Democratic electoral politics will tamp down the people’s power that was unleashed this summer and jeopardize Harris’s chances of victory. And also whether those in charge in the Democratic Party and in the Washington press corps even understand where that power comes from: a true women-led movement, built over decades and given new life in the aftermath of Hillary Clinton’s defeat in 2016, working in service of a female presidential candidate running on a set of policies around housing, care work, abortion, health care, and labor that this candidate understands to be inherently, but not exclusively, “women’s issues.” It is a movement galvanized by a devastating setback for women’s rights — for civil rights — that seeks to rectify that wrong and usher in a new era of American politics.
“It feels like finally our political culture is catching up to the extent to which women are shaping politics and shaping our democracy,” said Ai-jen Poo, senior adviser for Care in Action, a domestic-workers organization. “Women are owning and organizing to protect democracy in a totally different way.”
She describes how, in the days leading up to Biden’s withdrawal, all the Democratic poohbahs were determined to hold some kind of “blitz primary” and create some rube goldberg mechanism for “choosing” the right person to replace him. Those of you who read this blog regularly will remember that Tom Sullivan and I were adamantly against all of that, from the very beginning believing that Harris was the only choice and that the people who were pushing this nonsense were completely out to lunch. Traister points out that some of those people include Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama. But then Biden endorsed Harris right away (I think she sort of ungenerously questions his motives there) and while it took a few days for the naysayers to come around, the instant grassroots enthusiasm left them no choice but to get onboard:
Whatever reservations these leaders might have had were swept aside by a fervor for a Harris presidency that few people in Washington could have predicted. In her first week, she raised $200 million, two-thirds from first-time donors; more than 170,000 people volunteered for the campaign. The first day alone, 28,000 people signed up, more than 100 times what the Biden campaign had been seeing on an ordinary day. Within 48 hours of Biden’s stepping aside, I was crossing the street carrying a newly minted HARRIS sign for my kids and was greeted by honking horns, thumbs-up, people yelling from cars, “Where did you get that?” As Eaddy put it to me, “If you’ve seen The Wiz on Broadway, it was like when they sing ‘A Brand New Day.’”
The Win With Black Women call “really set the tone for the energy and momentum we’ve seen,” said Harris’s campaign manager, Julie Chávez Rodríguez, who is the granddaughter of famed labor activist César Chávez and describes herself as “an organizer by birth and by blood.”
One person who worked for Clinton in 2016 and afterward for Biden called me that first week nearly in tears. “They were just there for her,” she said, marveling at that first Sunday call. “It’s like these women just knew what to do. They formed a protective cocoon or maybe a kind of platform that could raise her up with joy and confidence. It was just like, ‘We got this. We got you.’”
The party came together in an unprecedented show of unity. I’m still reeling to tell you the truth. But it’s because the “cringe” Resistance just kept going (as Hillary Clinton exhorted them to do) and when the time came they were ready:
“You can see people reaching in and wanting to be a part of this and fuel it,” said Whitmer, a co-chair of Biden’s campaign and now of Harris’s. “Normal people. People that were sitting on the sidelines are now activated, people that were at the Women’s March and see that this is the moment where we can use organizing to push Kamala Harris over the finish line. The reason we’re having so much success as a campaign is because that work has been done — not finished, but the ground game has been growing — at that grassroots level over the last eight years.”
It’s quite a story and a hopeful one. I highly recommend the whole thing. She concludes with:
The people have the power, Harris told the Women’s March. The strength of the nation has always relied on the organizers, she told the Win With Black Women call in 2023. When we fight, she tells us now, we win. Maybe this time, we finally will.
.jpg){kind=link}