Well I Never

by digby

I’m watching Tweety, Barnicle and the rest of the gang wring their little lace hankies over how terrible it is that the NY Times ran a story with innuendos about McCain’s personal life — on the front page no less. They are “very sad” about all this. I think I’m like to faint dead away with the sheer inappropriateness of it all.

Let’s take a little trip down memory lane, shall we?

MATTHEWS: Let’s talk about the front page of The New York Times today, at the very top of the fold. I mean, it’s right up there at the banner, the Clinton marriage, “For the Clintons, delicate dance of married and public lives.” This is the most teasing story I’ve come across in The New York Times in a long time, the paper of record. Let me give you some quotes:

“Mr. Clinton is rarely without company in public, yet the company he keeps rarely includes his wife.”

“When the subject of Bill and Hillary Clinton comes up, for many prominent Democrats these days, topic A is the state of their marriage.”

“Bill and Hillary Clinton have built largely separate lives.”

It’s a complicated story, Bob, but why do you think your paper — I know you don’t put the front page together. Why did Bill Keller put this story at the top of the newspaper today?

HERBERT: Well, you have to ask Bill, but I can tell you that in my travels, people are really interested in the state of this marriage and, frankly, I think, you know, with Hillary’s presumed presidential ambitions, the state of the marriage is going to actually be a factor in her chances of getting the Democratic nomination, and perhaps, you know, becoming president.

MATTHEWS: The question I have for you, Michael, is that I was up there in Philly today on your show — it was great to be on your show. Let me ask you about this story. Without getting too much into the goo of this story, which I’m sure we’ll get into at some point between now and 2008, here’s the question: Why today, why did The New York Times break from the gate? We all thought this story would begin to evolve sometime after the election when Hillary gets reelected in New York, in all probability. We’d be talking about her presidential campaign and, of course, every aspect of her life becomes fair game at that point. Why do you think the Times broke from the gate? This is May 23.

SMERCONISH: I think that it’s probably the one issue about Hillary that people are most interested in. If I were to open up the telephone lines in Philly and I were to question folks about the Hillary candidacy, this is going to be way up there, probably beyond Iraq. I thought it was significant that in a typical month, they spend 14 days together. You know what, Chris? Not me. I want to make clear, but I think there are a lot of guys out there married who are probably envious of that number.

MATTHEWS: Well, I’m not. Let me ask you this. Let me go back to Bob Herbert —

HERBERT: Neither am I, Chris.

[…]

MATTHEWS: We’re back with radio talk show host Michael Smerconish of Philadelphia and New York Times columnist Bob Herbert. Bob, let me read you something from your newspaper again today. This story at the front, top of the newspaper, the very top of the newspaper, it’s amazing, there it is at the top.

Quote: “Because of Mr. Clinton’s behavior in the White House, tabloid gossip sticks to him like iron fillings to a magnet.” This is The New York Times. “Several prominent New York Democrats, in interviews, volunteered that they became concerned last year over a tabloid photograph showing Mr. Clinton leaving BLT Steak in Midtown Manhattan late one night after dining with a group that included a Belinda Stronach, a Canadian politician. The two were among roughly a dozen people at a dinner, but it still was enough to fuel coverage in the gossip pages.”

[…]

MATTHEWS: It was very carefully reported. Let me read you a quote from the Clintons — the two, the senator and the former president. It’s quite an interesting quote here: “She is an active senator who, like most members of Congress, has to be in Washington for part of most weeks. He is a former president running a multimillion-dollar global foundation. But their home is in New York, and they do everything they can to be together there or at their house in D.C. as often as possible — often going to great lengths to do so. When their work schedules require that they be apart, they talk all the time.” That’s a very defensive, formalized statement, isn’t it, Bob?

HERBERT: I mean, I really don’t know. It sounds to me — I read it, and I didn’t look for a hidden agenda, honestly. I read that as —

MATTHEWS: OK. You don’t think it’s setting them up for a different lifestyle? I thought it was saying —

HERBERT: I read that as —

MATTHEWS: OK.

HERBERT: — a reasonable, accurate depiction of what’s going on.

MATTHEWS: Could it be — to avoid all this kind of speculation that we’re already involved in, and I take responsibility — well, I share it with The New York Times here — Michael, that what they’re really saying, the official spokespeople for these two impressive people, is that they’re saying, “Don’t count on Bill Clinton living in the White House if Hillary gets elected. He’s got to run a big, multimillion dollars — they say, the spokesmen say — foundation. He’s got a lot of responsibilities up in New York City at his office up there, so don’t count on him being like a househusband or a first gentleman.”

SMERCONISH: No way.

MATTHEWS: Is that what they’re setting up here?

SMERCONISH: No, what they were saying is that most guys escape to the golf course to get away from their wives, and in his case, she’s in the United States Senate, and that’s his excuse.

HERBERT: Well, I don’t think they’re saying that he won’t be, you know, the first husband. I mean, I think that Bill Clinton is such a political junkie that he won’t be able to stay away if Hillary is president.

MATTHEWS: Well, I hate being away from my wife more than a day or two, but thank you, Michael. You obviously don’t mind that at all. Anyway, Bob Herbert, you go home and face her.

The NY Times has been reporting tabloid stories for a long time now on its front page. This one is notable only because it’s about St John McCain, the honorable All American hero, who has been immune from media criticism for some years — and because it actually points to something dramatically unethical: doing favors for lobbyists for personal reasons.

If the cable gasbags are hanging their heads in mourning over the tarnishing of their manly hero, the right wing talkers are rending their garments:

Limbaugh was one of several influential conservatives who, to the delight and relief of the McCain campaign, immediately decided that the behavior of the Times — not the senator — should be the issue.

Ingraham began her show this morning with a brief dig at McCain’s years of cozying up to the mainstream media, but then declared: “You wait until it’s pretty much beyond a doubt that he’s going to be the Republican nominee, and then you let it drop — drop some acid in the pool, contaminate the whole pool. That’s what The New York Times thinks.”

Ingraham was deriding the front-page article suggesting McCain had a romantic relationship with a telecommunications lobbyist in 1999, when he was chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee.

Ingraham was among the conservatives who endorsed former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney before he dropped out of the nomination race, and she has been among the high-profile talk show hosts who have been very critical of McCain.

McCain has been jokingly called “the senator from ‘Meet the Press’” because of his cozy relations with the elite media.

Ingraham said triumphantly, “I ask the McCain campaign this question: Do you think you need talk radio now? Do you think that talk radio’s important to set the record straight, or do you think a press conference, where the media is shouting question after question at you — do you think that’s going to put an end to all of this?”

Yeah, John, do you think you need talk radio now? Huh? I won’t be ignored, John…

This political culture is so incredibly screwed up.

.