Terrorist Sissies

by digby

FYI, PropH8 protesters are terrorists. (Actually, wingnuts trying to be funny is an official act of terrorism, in my view…)

al Gayda On The March: “By their fruit, ye shall know them.” The New York Times ends it’s piece with an interesting quote from a prominent Mormon and co-founder of the WordPerfect Corporation:

Mr. Ashton described the protests by same-sex marriage advocates as off-putting. “I think that shows colors,” Mr. Ashton said. “By their fruit, ye shall know them.”

They warned against a potential increase in terrorist activity during a presidential transition. I just don’t think they predicted the right source. And with large majorities of Hispanics and blacks supporting Prop 8 – the New York Times is pointing fingers – at the Mormons. Funny that the black churches draw a pass. It seems al Gayda and the NYT’s like their targets to be easy and white.

Michelle Malkin is following this horrific tale of thuggish gays with the same zeal she pursued the shocking Jamil Hussein non-story, while “reasonable” conservatives call it the “sissy hissy fit” telling gay people they could get more flies with honey than with vinegar.

20 years ago, in most places, gays were pretty thoroughly closeted across most of the nation. Four states (including, as I said, New Hampshire) offer civil unions. Another four have “domestic partnerships.” And the world has not come to an end.

When you push a demand for something, you can usually expect a push back. And the harder you push, the harder the pushback will likely be.

There’s an old saying that “you get more flies with honey than vinegar.” The folks out in California could stand to be reminded of that.

When it comes to social justice, it’s always the same old story:

I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and that when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress. I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that the present tension in the South is a necessary phase of the transition from an obnoxious negative peace, in which the Negro passively accepted his unjust plight, to a substantive and positive peace, in which all men will respect the dignity and worth of human personality. Actually, we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive. We bring it out in the open, where it can be seen and dealt with. Like a boil that can never be cured so long as it is covered up but must be opened with all its ugliness to the natural medicines of air and light, injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates, to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured.

Amen.

Update: Oh, and gays (and their secular “friends”) are fascists, too:

GINGRICH: Look, I think there is a gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us, is prepared to use violence, to use harassment. I think it is prepared to use the government if it can get control of it. I think that it is a very dangerous threat to anybody who believes in traditional religion. And I think if you believe in historic Christianity, you have to confront the fact. And, frank — for that matter, if you believe in the historic version of Islam or the historic version of Judaism, you have to confront the reality that these secular extremists are determined to impose on you acceptance of a series of values that are antithetical, they’re the opposite, of what you’re taught in Sunday school.

How do you stop such terrorist fascists? They are trying to destroy your life.

.