His Mouth Says No
by digby
…but his eyes say yes, maybe, if you beg me:
Many voters yearn for an outsider, someone with authenticity, integrity and proven accomplishment. Someone who has not spent their life plotting how to ascend the greasy pole, adjusting every utterance for maximum political advantage.In this toxic climate, perhaps the only public institution that has increased in prestige in recent years is the American military. Its officers are looked upon, as General George Patton once noted, as “the modern representatives of the demi-gods and heroes of antiquity”.Where better to look for Obama’s successor, therefore, than in the uniformed ranks? Not since 1952, when a certain Dwight Eisenhower, Supreme Commander of Allied Forces in Europe during the Second World War, was elected President, have the chances of a military man winning the White House been more propitious.Within those ranks, no one stands out like General David Petraeus, head of United States Central Command, leader of 230,000 troops and commander of United States forces in two wars. Having masterminded the Iraq surge, the stunning military gambit that seized victory from the jaws of defeat, he is now directing an equally daunting undertaking in Afghanistan.
*swoon*
Petraeus, 57, has survived the collapse of his parachute 60 feet above the ground. After he was shot in the chest during a training exercise and endured five hours surgery, the then battalion commander refused to lie in hospital recuperating. Demanding that the tubes be removed from his arm, he declared: “I am not the norm.”A Princeton PhD, he has revolutionised the way America fights its wars, inculcating the doctrine of counter-insurgency in a new generation of officers who have finally put the ghost of Vietnam to rest. At West Point he qualified for medical school just to prove he could, never bothering to apply.
*gush*
The problem is that Petraeus appears to have no desire to be commander-in-chief. His denials of any political ambition have come close to the famous statement by General William Sherman. The former American Civil War commander, rejecting the possibility of running for president in 1884 by stating: “I will not accept if nominated and will not serve if elected.”Yet speculation about “Petraeus in 2012″ persists. The White House is wary of him just as President Bill Clinton was wary of General Colin Powell in 1995. Rumours that he wants to run have even reached Downing Street.At a recent appearance in New Hampshire – which happens to be the state in which the first presidential primary will be held in January 2012 – Petraeus was emphatic.”I thought I’d said ‘no’ about as many ways as I could. I really do mean no,” he insisted when asked if he was destined for politics. “I’ve tried quoting a country song ‘What part of ‘no’ don’t you understand?’ but I really do mean that…I will not ever run for political office, I can assure you.” Almost Shermanesque.
Well, that’s that. How incredibly disappointing.
But does no really mean no?
Some note, however, when the future President Barack Obama was asked in February 2007 if he would serve his full six-year term in the Senate (due to expire in 2010), he responded: “If you get asked enough, sooner or later you get weary and you start looking for new ways of saying things.” When asked directly if he would run for the White House in 2008, he said flatly: “I will not.”
There all little prez-teases!Seriously, I have no idea if Petraeus will run. He would certainly be the savior the Republicans are waiting for. After all, the military is (so far anyway) the only elite institution that hasn’t completely destroyed itself over the past few years. And he’s at the very top of that elite heap.He may not want to run right now, but if they beg and plead and tell him how much they love him — well, he might just throw caution to the wind and go all the way.
.