Skip to content

It’s the only plan they’ve got

It’s the only plan they’ve got

by digby

The privatization zombie never dies:

As the AP reports, most of the top Republicans running are reviving President George W. Bush’s unpopular plan to create private investment accounts for young workers — believing that “workers could get a better return from investing in publicly traded securities.” Indeed, the idea of risking retirement funds in the stock market — three years after the financial crash on Wall Street — is finding a champion in almost ever Republican candidate:

MITT ROMNEY: The former Massachusetts governor has a well-worn record of advocating to privatize Social Security. In 2007, when Romney was also running for president, he pushed for the creation of Social Security personal accountsthree separate times. When a town hall attendee told him such a plan was “privatization,” Romney replied, “you call it privatization. I call it a private account.” He enshrined this position in his 2010 book No Apology, stating “individual retirement accounts would encourage more Americans to invest in the private sector that powers our economy.”MICHELE BACHMANN: In an interview last year, the Minnesota congresswoman insisted young workers “need to have some options in their life, so that going forward they can have ownership for their own Social Security, their own retirement, something they can pass on to the beneficiary of their choice.” When asked in 2008 how Republicans could promote privatization without frightening seniors, she responded, “I believe that we should ensure that those currently receiving Social Security should continue to do so in its current form, but also give a new generation of workers the right to invest some of their money into accounts of their own.” In 2006, she pledged to vote for “regulated individual retirement accounts.”RON PAUL: During last week’s presidential debate, Rep. Paul (TX) drew applause for stating, “What I would like to do is to allow all the young people to get out of Social Security and go on their own!” He told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer last year that he’d support “turn[ing] this money over and give the individual money like an investment retirement fund that they manage.”RICK SANTORUM: After writing an op-ed calling to “establish personal retirement accounts” in 2005, the former Pennsylvania senator actually launched his 2012 presidential campaign by reminding everyone that he supports these President George W. Bush-style private accounts. He hedged last month on calling for the immediate creation of accounts, but only because having to additionally pay for Social Security benefits while financing such accounts “is to me just something that we can’t do right now.” “I’d love to be able to do it,” he added.HERMAN CAIN: In the Tea Party debate last week, the pizza mogul declared, “I support a personal retirement system option in order to phase [out] the current system. We know that this works.”NEWT GINGRICH: Last year, the former House Speaker endorsed House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) plan to create personal accounts. He believed such a plan would “triple the earnings” for future retirees. He has touted such a plan since 2007.

Jon Huntsman has not specifically called for private accounts but he did say at the Tea Party debate that “I don’t think anything should be off the table.”

Logic would suggest that it’s pretty unlikely they can ever pass this plan, but after the last few years of bipartisan demagogueing the alleged social security crisis (and the character of this era’s Democrats) I’m not sure that a GOP president with a Republican congress won’t get it done this time. They’re just that nuts and the Democrats are just that feckless.

But we live in hope that this, at least, will be fresh enough in everyone’s mind that the people will fight back:
Three years ago, if Bush had succeeded in creating private accounts, an American worker would have lost $26,000 on the market. As ThinkProgress’ Travis Waldron notes, millions of Americans who did have a private account like a 401(k) lost nearly everything in the crisis, and Social Security is the only source of retirement funds they have left. Thevolatility of market behavior in large industrialized economies like ours “illustrates the real potential for decades-long declines that could erode the value of a private retirement account invested in stocks.”

People invest retirement savings in the stock market because they need their money to grow over time to make up for inflation and provide a little return. And while I realize that the new vogue in capitalism is absolute certainty in all things, the reality is that such growth entails risk and there is always a chance that you’re going to lose money in the markets. That’s why government backed Social Security is such an important part of everyone’s retirement, not just those who are too poor to save any money. It’s the backstop against bad luck and risks gone wrong.

These people want to take away that secure part of everyone’s retirement and put them at risk of losing everything when assholes on Wall Street decide they’ve got a great new way to scam people out of their money. Hopefully, the stock market crash and ensuing volatility are recent enough to make even these nutcase Republicans leery of trying to do this, but I wouldn’t bet on it. It’s the only plan they’ve got.

.

Published inUncategorized