By Dennis Hartley
During the peak of its imperialistic forays, it was oft-stated that the “sun never sets” on the British Empire. While that may have been an accurate cartographic assessment, there was a time or two along the way when His Majesty’s Government suffered a total eclipse…of the heart. In February 2010, British PM Gordon Brown issued an official apology for one of these little hiccups, a child migration policy that had been implemented in one form or another from the 19th century through the late 1960s. It is estimated that more than 130,000 children were affected. According to a CNN article from last year, the group who represents the tail end of this shameful chapter is known as the “Forgotten Australians”, who were shipped off starting just after the end of WW II:
The so-called “Forgotten Australians” were British children brought up by impoverished families or living in care homes who were shipped to Australia with the promise of a better life.But many ended up in institutions and orphanages, suffering abuse and forced labor. They later told of being kept in brutal conditions, being physically abused and being forced to work on farms. Many were wrongly told they were orphans, with brothers and sisters separated at dock side and sent to different parts of the country.
It’s hard to believe that this Dickensian scenario continued to flourish under the auspices of the British government until 1970, which was when the final “shipment” arrived in Oz (the Australian government has since apologized as well for its part in the three decade-long collusion; whether or not all of the various church and charity organizations involved at the grass roots level have admitted as such is anyone’s guess). However, as some of these children might have recited at one time or another, “For every evil under the sun, there is a remedy or there is none.” In this case, the remedy (or at least a salve) arrived in the person of a British social worker named Margaret Humphreys, who, beginning in the mid-1980s, almost single-handedly brought this purloined period of systemic social injustice to world-wide attention, as well as reuniting hundreds of these “forgotten” children (adults by then) with their surviving parents in England. Humphreys wrote a book about how this all led to the founding of her Child Migrants Trust, which has now been adapted into the new film Oranges and Sunshine, directed by Jim Loach.
The story opens in 1986, in Nottingham. Initially, Margaret (Emily Watson) seems an unlikely candidate for facilitating long-overdue family reunions; in the opening scene, she is in fact doing exactly the opposite-taking custody of an infant from its pleading and obviously distraught mother, while the police stand by as dispassionate observers. Margaret keeps her professional cool, but her eyes telegraph a pained resignation to the fact that it is one of those necessary evils that real nitty-gritty social work entails at times.
One night, as she is leaving her office, Margaret is approached by an Australian woman who tells her she was born in Nottingham, but had been placed into government care as an infant and shipped off to an Australian children’s home. Although she had grown up under the impression that she was an orphan, the woman now has reason to believe that she may have been lied to all those years. She pleads with Margaret to help her find her family roots. Margaret reluctantly promises to investigate, if she can find the time. However, after another woman (Lorraine Ashbourne) in one of her counseling groups recounts an unusual story about how she was reunited in adult life with a long-lost brother (Hugo Weaving) who had also apparently been sent off to Australia not long after the siblings had been put into government care, Margaret becomes intrigued to dig deeper. Before too long, she connects the dots and a disturbing historical pattern emerges.
This is the directorial debut for Loach (son of Ken), who seems to have inherited his father’s penchant for telling a straightforward story, informed by a righteous social conscience and peopled by wholly believable flesh-and-blood characters. He doesn’t try to dazzle us with showy visuals; he’s wise enough to know that when you’ve got an intelligent script (Rona Munro adapted from Humphreys’ book, Empty Cradles) and a skilled ensemble, any extra bells and whistles would only serve to detract from the humanity at the core of the story. Watson never hits a false note; she doesn’t overplay Margaret as a saintly heroine, but rather as an ordinary person who made an extraordinary difference (even if giving up some of her nervous system along the way).
Don’t expect a Rocky-like third act (or buildup, for that matter), which is what I suspect a Hollywood production would have tacked on. While elements of this story are inherently inspiring, it also has a very sad and bittersweet undercurrent. After all, these people were not only essentially robbed of their childhoods, but denied foreknowledge of their true identity, the very essence of what defines each of us as a unique individual. As Margaret herself says in frustration at the film’s denouement to one of the now-adult migrant children (an excellent David Denham), after he has taken her to visit the Christian Brothers’ mission where he and many others were physically and sexually abused: “Everybody always thinks there’s going to be this one big cathartic moment when all the wrongs are righted and all the wounds are healed…but it’s not going to happen. I can’t give you back what you’ve lost.” Neither can a film; but like Margaret, it assures us that there is some compassion left in this fucked-up world. And that’s a comforting thought.
Previous posts with similar themes:Marwencol
.