Greenhouse gas regulations spurring community innovation
by David Atkins
One of the arguments made by conservatives against government regulations is that they don’t work, or that they cause more harm than good. It’s early yet, but when it comes to greenhouse gas regulations in California communities are coming up with interesting and innovative ways to make improvements:
When California’s S.B. 375 was passed in 2008, there were many skeptics. The law aimed to get metropolitan regions around the state to cut greenhouse gas emissions through changes to development form and transportation. (If it were a country, California would rank somewhere between the world’s 10th and 12th largest economy, so its effect could be significant.)
In 2011, the California Air Resources Board set GHG emissions reduction targets by metro region for passenger vehicles (passenger vehicles account for almost a third of GHGs in the state). Eighteen Metropolitan Planning Organizations were then to develop “sustainable community strategies,” wherein integrated transportation, housing, and community development, working together, could help achieve those specific objectives.
The idea was that smart, sustainable community design, coordinated with transportation systems that integrated walkability, bicycles, and next generation public transit, could really make a difference. It’s honestly much too soon to tell whether this will work. But here’s a quick look at three prominent metropolitan regions and their responses to this mandate.
Be sure to read the whole article: these cities are doing fascinating things with land use planning to make the regulations work in ways that benefit public and private space. In a lot of ways, regulation can be a source of innovation.
.