Tasers, Electro-shock in the courtroom and “Don’t do stupid stuff”
by digby
I’ve got some pieces up today in other venues you might be interested in checking out. (I guess I’ve been busy …)
Over at Salon I discuss a terrible case of a judge ordering a defendant who is representing himself in court to be zapped with an electronic bracelet he was wearing — for making an argument the judge doesn’t like:
“Stop,” Judge Nalley said.
“… principles of common right and common reason are …” King said.
“Mr. Sheriff … ” Nalley said
“… null and void,” King continued.
“… do it,” Nalley ordered. “Use it.”
“(DEFENDANT SCREAMS).”
That’s a passage from a transcript of a trial in a Maryland courtroom last week in which a judge ordered a deputy sheriff to administer electroshock to a defendant who was representing himself in a case before him. The defendant was not charging the bench or threatening violence in any way. He was simply saying things the judge did not want to hear.
For unknown reasons, this defendant had been outfitted with an electronic device, presumably something having to do with the fact that he was representing himself and would be moving freely about the courtroom. When he asserted some dicey “sovereign citizen” legal doctrine, the judge told him to stop and when he didn’t, the judge ordered the deputy to shock him. He fell to the ground, screaming in pain, and after he was calm a medic was called to make sure his vital signs were OK. Then they went back to jury selection as if nothing had happened. The defendant, as you might imagine, was somewhat subdued after the electroshock treatment.
Apparently charging him with contempt wouldn’t have sufficed.
Over at BillMoyers.com Joshua Holland published an interview I did with him about tasers and the new generation of crowd control devices.
And finally, here are some thoughts I jotted down for The New York Times‘ discussion group Room for Debate about President Obama’s “Don’t do Stupid Stuff” Doctrine. (I’m for it …)
.