What’s the problem? All you have to do is fix it.
by digby
There are lots of reasons to suspect that the Chief Justice will not step in to save the subsidies in the Obamacare federal exchange in the King case, but this from Richard Hasen reflects my instinct on how it’s going to go:
[I]t seems entirely possible that Roberts might focus narrowly this time on the snippet of the act extending subsidies only to those insured by exchanges “established by the state.” One argument he might make in defense of that position is that Congress has the ability to go back and fix any unclear language through a revised statute.
Roberts telegraphed his willingness to take such an approach in the 2013 Shelby County vs. Holder case, which struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act. The provision the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional defined which states had to get federal approval (or pre-clearance) before making changes to their voting laws. Roberts’ opinion for the majority ordered the provision struck because it was based on old data. Congress, he reasoned, could simply update the formula to respond to “current conditions” if it wished to.
When Roberts wrote his Shelby County opinion, he knew full well that Congress would not update the coverage formula. Congress is polarized, and the issue was a political hot potato. Indeed, in the period since the opinion, a bill introduced to update the Voting Rights Act has gone nowhere. It is supported by Democrats and a sole Republican, Jim Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.).
Although Congress used to come forward on a bipartisan basis to change laws in response to Supreme Court rulings, the number of such overrides has fallen to a trickle. From 1975 to 1990, Congress overrode an average of 12 Supreme Court decisions in each two-year congressional cycle. In the last decade, that number has fallen to 2.7 every two years, and there have been no significant overrides during the Obama presidency since Republicans took over the House of Representatives. During the last two years, perhaps owing to the intensity of the current political polarization and paralysis, overrides have been even rarer.
All the court has to do is say, “Hey, the language of the law needs a little tweak to make it work so all the congress has to do is hold a pro-forma vote to change it and it’s all good.” Then Roberts, Scalia, Alito, Kennedy and Thomas all high five each other and laugh maniacally.
Sure, the law can be “fixed”. When hell freezes over….
I’m so old I can remember being reassured that once the law, no matter how imperfect, was in place Republicans would be forced to work with Democrats to make it work better.
Yes, people really said that.
.