Some members of the media are pulling their Prada safari jackets out of mothballs
by digby
If you’ve been watching TV news you have undoubtedly noticed that reporters and commentators are getting very, very stimulated over the Paris attack. Their blood is up and they want action and I mean now. Actually, they demand violence. And the president just isn’t giving them the blind, counterproductive revenge fantasy they seem to need.
Anyway, I wrote about it for Salon today. It’s going to be a long election:
Unfortunately, much of the press seems to have decided to reprise their role in the run-up to the Iraq war and cheer on calls for military invasion while criticizing anyone who suggests that everyone take a breath before deciding that it’s time to invade more countries in the middle east. One such object of their ire was President Obama who held a press conference on Tuesday and, in their view, failed to offer up the satisfyingly bellicose saber rattling they apparently needed to hear.
During the Q&A, Jim Acosta of CNN (who had been fulminating about the fall of western civilization all week-end) asked the question that perfectly illustrated their excited delirium:
“I think a lot of Americans have this frustration that they see that the United States has the greatest military in the world. It has the backing of nearly every other country in the world when it comes to taking on ISIS, and I guess the question is, and if you’ll forgive the language, is why can’t we take out these bastards?”
The president was too polite to ask if Acosta was five years old, but he did seem a bit annoyed. This vacuous question came on the heels of a long deliberate explanation of the complexities and challenges involved in trying to solve the problem, including the obvious fact that “the greatest military in the world” is not the answer to every problem.
When the president said, “We play into the ISIL narrative when we act as if they are a state and we use routine tactics used to fight a state that is not a state — that’s not what is going on here — these are killers with fantasies of glory,” he inflamed the hawkish press representatives so much they just couldn’t contain themselves. CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, for example, was very angry:
AMANPOUR:If anybody was expecting to hear in the passion and eloquence and speech patterns of President Obama a tipping point, they did not hear that today. And as you say, defensive when he was asked questions about American leadership, dismissing the notions of American leadership as mere slogans, seeming not to take into account the very palpable fear amongst citizens, certainly here in France, to an extent in the United States, certainly in the United Kingdom — everybody bracing for the worst of the worst to happen again…COOPER: In terms of containment, though, he is trying to stress, and whether it’s walking back comments he made before, he’s really in this was stressing geographic containment on the ground compared to the same time —
AMANPOUR:Fine. But in terms of ability they are not contained. They have just slaughtered 129 people in Paris. The death toll may rise very higher because there are 352 people injured, of whom 99 are critically wounded. So the question is to have an honest conversation now about a new strategy.
Let’s just say that if you are looking for dispassionate reporting and analysis, you’re going to have a hard time finding it on CNN.
But that was nothing compared to what Fox News offered up. Bill Hemmer was practically in tears bemoaning the fact that the president was refusing to declare war on evil: