Chris Christie “national security expert”
by digby
I wrote about Christie’s so-called national security cred for Salon this morning:
Governor Chris Christie seems to having something of a renaissance in the press these days. The influential Manchester Union Leader,the leading conservative newspaper in New Hampshire, endorsed him and he’s inched up a bit in the polls there, but a guy who was relegated to the kiddie table in the last presidential debate is suddenly getting more attention than his numbers would indicate is called for.A little research shows that he started to get a bit more traction in the press after a specific event: the Paris terrorist attacks. One might wonder why that would be considering that he’s not exactly a foreign policy expert (not that any of the GOP candidates are except perhaps for Lindsey Graham who didn’t even make it to the kids table last time). Apparently, even though he’s really just another Governor with no military or diplomatic experience the fact that his state is next to New York where the 9/11 terrorist attacks took place and he was a federal prosecutor makes him a reassuring expert.The prosecutor part of the story is interesting since he’s been fudging it a bit for years. Christie’s experience prior to being U.S. Attorney was as a corporate lawyer and major Bush bundler. He had very little political experience and none as a prosecutor before being appointed. (You may recall that the Bush administration treated these jobs as purely political appointments so many of its nominees were hacks like Christie.) On the campaign trail and even in one of the early debates he claimed he was appointed by President Bush on September 10th 2001 and the impression he always gives is that his first day on the job was 9/11. But the truth is that he didn’t actually become US Attorney for several weeks afterwards. It’s not terribly important but it shows a certain propensity to gild the lily.In his stump speech he commonly makes the claim that he is particularly qualified on national security because he prosecuted terrorists. He says, “I’m the only person in this national conversation who has used the PATRIOT Act, signed off on it, convicted terrorists because of it” as if that makes him especially qualified on national security.If you’re curious about the kind of prosecutions he brought, NPR did an episode of “This American Life” on one of his biggest cases back in 2005, the case of Hemant Lakhani. Katherine Mangu-Ward of Reason helpfully wrote up a nice little review of the show (which you can listen to in full, here) which she describes as “a tale of ineptitude, entrapment, and bureaucratic self-perpetuation, starring very young U.S. attorney Christopher Christie.”Is it ever. Chris Hayes wrote back in 2006 about the case for The Nation:In August 2003 … the New York dailies breathlessly reported what one US official called an “incredible triumph in the war against terrorism,” the arrest of Hemant Lakhani, a supposed terrorist mastermind caught red-handed attempting to acquire a surface-to-air missile. Only later did the government admit that the “plot” consisted of an FBI informant begging Lakhani to find him a missile, while a Russian intelligence officer called up Lakhani and offered to sell him one.This terrorist mastermind tried to pay the fake arms dealer with a personal check.Lakhani was a 70 year old con artist who, as Reason put it, “gets sent to jail for buying a fake missile from a fake arms dealer to be delivered to a fake terrorist group at an airport Hilton.” Not that he didn’t think he was actually participating in a terrorist conspiracy. But the idea that he could have actually pulled one off is very far fetched. Not that Christie lost any sleep over it. He said:“I’m not going to sit around and second guess it. What was done was done, and I think ultimately the jury decided that question…there are good people and bad people. Bad people do bad things. Bad people have to be punished. These are simple truths. Bad people must be punished. ..I don’t have a crystal ball and I don’t know, if this had fallen apart, what Hemant Lakhani would have done next.That’s the kind of guy I want in federal prison, and so that’s where he’s going to go. And at the end, that’s the success of the Lakhani case.”
There’s more at the link. Christie is highly unlikely to win anything. But I noticed yesterday that he was treated respectfully in the press yesterday as they were talking about all the presidential candidates, even as he was spouting nonsense, and it was a little bit alarming.
.