Skip to content

Month: February 2016

Trump’s “negotiation” comments

Trump’s “negotiation” comments

by digby

So everyone is all a-dither that Trump made some remarks to the New York Times editorial board on background that indicate he thinks the deportation of all the undocumented workers in America might be a chip in a “negotiation” as president. But as someone pointed out to me on email, this isn’t a secret. He said it on the record to Byron York just days after the NY Times interview in January:

So I look at deporting all illegal immigrants. I look at a temporary ban of Muslims coming to the United States. They get a lot of attention. Are they opening positions in a negotiation? 

I’m not saying there can’t be some give and take, but at some point we have to look at these things. You look at the radical Islamic terrorism and you look at what’s going on, we have to take a serious look. There’s tremendous hatred. You look at illegal immigration and all that’s taking place with respect to illegal immigration, whether it’s the crime or the economy, I mean, it affects many different elements. It doesn’t mean I’m hard and fast 100 percent, but we to get a lot of what I’m asking for, or we’re not going to have a country any more. 

So they are opening positions? 

They are very strong positions. It doesn’t mean you’re not going to negotiate a little bit, but I guess there will always be some negotiation. But they are very strong positions, and I would adhere to those positions very strongly. That doesn’t mean that at some point we won’t talk a little bit about some negotiation. Who wouldn’t do that?

This is how he talks. It’s gibberish.

I have no idea what he “really” plans to do about undocumented immigrants.  But I do know that he says  they’re rapists and criminal and that he’s going to deport them all and build a wall — and that his crowds cheer ecstatically whenever he says it.  The hatred he is pimping says everything you need to know.

And, by the way, there is no  guarantee that he won’t do any of this stuff. Cops love this guy. And he’d be in charge of the federal police apparatus of the United States of America.

Trust him?

.

It might not be working for Marco

It might not be working for Marco

by digby

I don’t place a lot of faith in any particular poll, but let’s just say it won’t surprise me if this turns out to be true:

If Rubio hoped that going negative on Trump in the most recent GOP debate and on the campaign stump would reap benefits with voters, it hasn’t resonated with our national respondents. Forty-four percent of voters polled are backing the New York businessman, an increase of two percentage points from a few days ago. Meanwhile, Rubio dropped from 19 percent to 14 percent, with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz moving into second with 15 percent of voters’ support.

All of this could just be normal churn but it does indicate that Rubio’s gambit to fight Trump with juvenile insults to his manhood isn’t resonating with the voters. If you’re going to play the dominance game you have to actually dominate. Rubio’s attacks came very late and are, in my opinion, the wrong kind for someone like him. He’s too fresh faced and callow to get away with schoolyard taunts. Now, if Christie had been in his position it might have worked. But Rubio had enough trouble being seen as a mature, presidential-level leader. This doesn’t help.

He should have attacked him quite seriously on his honesty about his business record. That’s the foundation on which the Trump mystique relies and if he’d been able to show it for the house of cards it really is he might gotten headway. Cheap dick jokes only work for bully boys like Christie and Trump.

.

It’s all for your own good

It’s all for your own good

by digby

The Villagers never seem to worry much about the threat of wingnut extremism since they know so many nice Republicans in Washington who wouldn’t hurt a fly, but the media does tend to get a little bit concerned when the freakshow goes after them personally. Last week Trump introduced a new line on the stump about changing the libel laws to keep the press from being able to write “lies” about him. He wants to be able to sue more freely.

He’s still on it today:

There are a lot of reasons why people don’t respect the media, not the least of which is the fact that they are owned and operated by demagogues and charlatans like Trump. Giving even more power to rich guys isn’t the answer.

But if trump wins, you can bet that’s going to be first on his agenda.

.

White supremacy Sunday in the GOP

White supremacy Sunday in the GOP

by digby

I wrote about Trump’s various endorsements for Salon this morning:

Last August, Donald Trump held his biggest outdoor rally up until that time down in Mobilem Ala. The press dutifully covered it from beginning to end as they like to do and contrary to what Trump says every day on the stump, they panned out to show that he had filled up a very large space with thousands and thousands of ecstatic supporters. It was a bit surprising to see signs which said “Thank you Lord Jesus for President Trump” and even more startling to hear people in the crowd yelling “White Power.” Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions appeared at the rally and Trump handed him a “Make America Great Again” hat. At the time, most people thought it was just one more wacky moment in the early days of the crazy primary campaign that we’d all laugh about later.

Nobody’s laughing today.  Donald Trump is the undisputed frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination. He held another gigantic rally in Alabama yesterday and Senator Jeff Sessions appeared onstage again, this time to officially endorse his candidacy. He gave the crowd what they wanted, saying:
“For 30 years, politicians have promised to fix illegal immigration. Have they done it?”

No,” the crowd roared back.

“Donald Trump will do it,” Sessions said.

There were no reports of people screaming “white power” in the audience but the rousing reception for Sessions speaks for itself.  He’s one of the leading xenophobe voices in America and has a long and illustrious history of hostility toward African Americans as well. He is the most unreconstructed racist in the U.S. Senate today.

Throughout the morning leading up to the surprise endorsement, the media had been pressing Trump on whether he would disavow any support from KKK leader David Duke; Trump was dancing around it, pretending he wasn’t sure who Duke was. When word of the Sessions endorsement was announced it suddenly became clear why he did that. Sunday was “white power” day for the Trump campaign and he didn’t want to dampen the celebration by criticizing the participants.

If you look at the public figures who are first out of the gate to endorse Trump now that he looks to be so formidable that they cannot hope to stop him, you’ll see Chris Christie, known for his derision and bullying; former Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, best known for her anti-immigration proposals demanding that people who “look illegal” offer up their papers; former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke; and Maine Governor Paul LePage, who was last heard complaining that drug dealers come up to Maine from New York to sell their drugs and “half the time they impregnate a young, white girl before they leave.” Now there’s Sessions too. Trump is, in other words lining up the country’s most famous bullies, xenophobes, and bigots to endorse him. (And that’s not even counting the avowed white supremacists who are doing robocalls on his behalf.)

The right is acting shocked — shocked! — that anyone would ever say there’s racism going on in their party, and they are all practically calling for the smelling salts at the mere suggestion that Donald Trump might be appealing to white people who hold racist views. This is to be expected. After all, even their protestations are a form of dogwhistle at this point: The pretense of horror at being called racist is a signal to fellow racists.

But the right wing isn’t alone in protesting the very obvious fact that Trump’s appeal is based in racism. There are more than a few members of the left who get similarly upset at any suggestion that the Trump phenomenon might be driven by race. This is odd considering his blatant xenophobia with respect to Hispanic immigrants and Muslims, his blaming of every economic problem on cunning leaders of foreign governments and his long history of outright racism when it comes to African Americans.

If these racist and xenophobic polices weren’t the central message of his campaign — if he weren’t promising to deport and ban millions of people — perhaps it might be believable that the white people who are voting for him [he doesn’t have any other kind] do so in spite of this agenda rather than because of it. The data does not support that. The New York Times reports:

According to P.P.P., 70 percent of Mr. Trump’s voters in South Carolina wish the Confederate battle flag were still flying on their statehouse grounds. (It was removed last summer less than a month after a mass shooting at a black church in Charleston.) The polling firm says that 38 percent of them wish the South had won the Civil War. Only a quarter of Mr. Rubio’s supporters share that wish, and even fewer of Mr. Kasich’s and Mr. Carson’s do.

Nationally, further analyses of the YouGov data show a similar trend: Nearly 20 percent of Mr. Trump’s voters disagreed with Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, which freed slaves in the Southern states during the Civil War. Only 5 percent of Mr. Rubio’s voters share this view.

Mr. Trump’s popularity with white, working-class voters who are more likely than other Republicans to believe that whites are a supreme race and who long for the Confederacy may make him unpopular among leaders in his party. But it’s worth noting that he isn’t persuading voters to hold these beliefs. The beliefs were there — and have been for some time.

Progressives naturally balk at the idea that hardworking people, suffering in a stagnating economy, might be driven by something something so dark as racism when the fact is that they have much more in common economically with people of color than this blowhard billionaire who’s selling some snake oil about “making deals” with foreign countries so America will be “great again.” But it’s a sad reality that this racial animosity lies at the heart of many of America’s pathologies, particularly its unwillingness to adopt social democratic policies going all the way back to the beginning.

And it’s still with us:

However, just because Trump is appealing to many white people who are motivated by bigotry, it does not also mean that white people, or even the white working class,  are all bigots who will vote for Donald Trump. After 2012, when the conventional wisdom held that Democrats were as dead in the water with working class whites as Republicans were with Latinos and African Americans, The New Republic’s Nate Cohn  pointed out that the whites Romney won were very much centered in  specific regions. In a piece called “The GOP Has Problems With White Voters, Too,” he wrote:

Romney’s strong national showing among white voters was almost exclusively driven by historic support from Southern and Appalachian white voters. In many counties, Obama’s performance was the worst by any Democrat since McGovern or, in some places, ever. Even a quick glance at overwhelmingly white, Southern, or Appalachian counties with a history of offering even limited support to Democratic candidates shows Obama performing anywhere from 15 to 30 points worse than Kerry did eight years ago. Obama even lost more than 50 points compared to Kerry’s performance in several “coal country” counties in southern West Virginia and eastern Kentucky.

Outside the South, Romney’s performance among white voters was anything but historic. He ran behind Bush’s tallies in most of the northern half of the United States. While some believed that Obama’s weakness among white voters would translate into opportunities for Romney in overwhelmingly white states like Iowa, New Hampshire, and Wisconsin, Obama ultimately won these three states by 5.6 to 6.9 points, even though Bush never lost any by more than 1.3 points.”

The point is that there are plenty of white working- and middle-class people in this country who are not necessarily going to be seduced by Donald Trump’s noxious racism. And there is also no doubt that the Democratic party’s coalition now and in the future is multi-ethnic and multi-racial and those who are hostile to that idea are simply never going to vote for the Democrats regardless of policies that may benefit them. Those people are motivated by the need to maintain a social status and cultural dominance that is rapidly disappearing.
That is not to say that Democrats should not offer an agenda that benefits these people regardless of their voting habits. It’s the job of the left to push hard for policies on behalf of all working families. But it’s foolish to expect that this cohort is going to respond with gratitude or even acknowledge that they are better off. (Witness the loathing for Obamacare even as many benefit from it.)
Maybe Trump will be the last gasp of this dynamic, and class solidarity will rise above racial resentment at long last. But for now, it does no good to ignore the fact that the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for president has just been endorsed by some of the the nation’s most notorious racists and xenophobes and is routinely cheered by ecstatic crowds for his bigotry. America’s made a lot of progress but it’s not there yet.

Everybody gets a trophy By Dennis Hartley #Oscars

Everybody gets a trophy


By Dennis Hartley














As this is a busy weekend for passing out movie awards, Digby has graciously invited me back for Oscar night. Yesterday, IFC continued their time-honored tradition of cutting in line a day before the Oscar telecast with the Independent Spirit Awards. While several of the nominated films crossed over with the Academy’s, they stayed true to form by largely championing substance, creativity, innovation, and (*ahem*) diversity over box office.


FWIW, here are links to my reviews of some of this year’s Independent Spirit nominees:


Best of Enemies (Best Documentary)


Heart of a Dog (Best Documentary)
Love and Mercy (Best Supporting Male)


Results (Best Supporting Male)


Also related:



And here are links to my previous reviews that cover some of this year’s Oscar nominees:


The Big Short (5 nominations)
Boy and the World (Best Animated Feature Film)
The Hateful Eight (Best Supporting Actress, Cinematography, and Original Score)
The Revenant (12 nominations)
Spectre (Best Original Song)
Trumbo (Best Actor)
A War (Best Foreign Language Film)
When Marnie Was There (Best Animated Feature Film)


Also related:




If anyone can get us through this one, it’s Chris Rock. I have to go warm up the DVR…


More reviews at Den of Cinema


Dennis Hartley

And all the racists gather behind him for some reason

And all the racists gather behind him for some reason

by digby

Trump’s got Michael Savage. And David Duke. And today Senator Jefferson Beauregard Sessions finally came through for him, thus explaining why he didn’t disavow the KKK and his other white supremacists earlier today.

And then there’s this one:

On the heels of his endorsements from a trio of American governors, Donald Trump now has the backing of a leader overseas.

The endorsement is not much of a surprise, given the beliefs shared by Trump and Le Pen. Trump has made immigration a centerpiece of his campaign, pledging to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border and to deport millions of undocumented immigrants.

Those proposals would be right at home in Le Pen’s far-right National Front party.

The endorsement from abroad comes at a time when Republican leaders here in the U.S. are beginning to line up behind Trump as the party’s likely presidential nominee.

Trump collected endorsements this week from New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Maine Gov. Paul LePage and former Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer.

Jean-Marie Le Pen, the founder and former leader of France’s National Front party, said Saturday on Twitter that he would support Trump if he were an American. The tweet, written in French, closed with Le Pen offering God’s blessing to Trump.

Trump has endorsed Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un but no word on whether they are prepared to return the favor. Putin did say he thought Trump was terrific so perhaps a formal endorsement is on the way.

.

Spotlight and “moral authority”

Spotlight and “moral authority”

by digby

Tonight at the Oscars we may see a movie win Best Picture that dramatizes one of the most important stories about religion and powerful institutions that we’ve seen in many a moon.  I’m talking about “Spotlight” the film about the Boston Globe’s investigative team which revealed the systemic child abuse that had been covered up for decades by the Catholic hierarchy in very Catholic Boston. It’s a truly amazing film, one of those “procedurals” but it’s about journalism, not police work, and it’s a story we already knew —a nd it’s fascinating nonetheless.

I hope it wins some prizes and that everyone sees it. But I have to say I think it’s pretty amazing that the biggest Christian church in the world has been revealed to have covered up thousands of cases of child rape over the course of many decades, perhaps centuries, and they somehow came out with their moral authority intact.  This I will never understand. This wasn’t just a slip-up. These are among the worst crimes human beings commit, a total taboo, particularly in a church which has no compunction about policing the sexuality of its flock.
I’m not a Catholic so I guess it’s not my business.  But whenever I see the pope exalted as this wonderful compassionate world leader these thoughts pop into my head. When I see the US media turn into shrieking fanboys and treat his visit as if he were a living saint come to bless us with his presence I think about this. Again, not my business. But it’s hard for me to see why anyone should take the Church’s moral teachings seriously after that. 
This article in the New Yorker about the Spotlight team, in which Sarah Larson revisits the reporters and editors who wrote the stories revealing the rot in the Boston archdiocese is a fascinating look at what they went through in investigating these horrific stories of abuse. They had to listen to hundreds and hundreds of people describe what had happened to them and the ongoing destruction of their psyches throughout their lives afterwards. The interviewed very, very old people who confessed to what had happened as long ago as the 1920s for the first time in their lives. It was a harrowing experience. 
But this really stuck out at me, something I had sort of been feeling but hadn’t put into words:

On my way out, Rezendes gave me a tour of the Globe library—the vast collection of clip files that the journalists consult, the photograph archives, the spiral staircase seen in the movie. Before I left, we talked about Pope Francis and his often disappointing response to the crisis, as well as the Church’s inflexible positions on the celibacy requirement, women in the clergy, contraception, homosexuality, and so on. I told Rezendes a theory I’d heard from the comedian and childhood-rape survivor Barry Crimmins: that Pope Francis is the Church’s way of changing the conversation without changing the Church. Rezendes looked thoughtful. “That makes some sense,” he said.

I’m glad the Pope cares about the poor and is talking about climate change. These things matter and apparently a lot of people still care what the Pope says.  So that’s good. But this other thing, this big horrible, child rape thing, is still out there, rotting the institution from within.

.

A book recommendation

A book recommendation

by digby

An e-book from The Nation that features an essay by little old me:

Who is Hillary Clinton? is a fascinating time-lapse depiction of the leading Democratic presidential candidate as seen from the left. But it is also much more than that. A carefully-edited anthology of The Nation’s coverage of Clinton’s career, it’s a rigorous and painstaking study of one our most enigmatic public figures. It is a history of our time, and a must-read for the 2016 election season.

Contributors include David Corn, Erica Jong, Christopher Hitchens, Michael Tomasky, William Greider, Ari Berman, Barbara Ehrenreich, Chris Hayes, Jessica Valenti, Richard Kim, Joan Walsh, Jamelle Bouie, Doug Henwood, Heather Digby Parton, Michelle Goldberg, and many more.

“Hillary Clinton is a Rorschach test of our attitudes—including our unconscious ones—about women, feminism, sex and marriage, to say nothing of the Democratic Party, progressive politics, the United States and capitalism,” writes Nation columnist Katha Pollitt in the book’s introduction. “This collection of Nation articles won’t answer all the readers’ questions, but at the very least in brings the Rorschach blot into clearer focus.”

The Nation has endorsed Sanders. Whether you like Clinton or hate her, it’s an interesting collection of views.

.

Who said he looked too young and wasn’t presidential?

Who said he looked too young and wasn’t presidential?

by digby

Here’s the thing. Rubio did have to attack Trump.  It was long overdue if he expected win. And there are many things he can attack him with. But resorting to schoolyard taunts about his looks is not good for Rubio who ends up being diminished in stature. He already looks like a kid. Now he’s acting like one.

You can’t out-Trump Trump.  He’s sui generis.  The  attacks on his business career would seem to be much more fruitful territory to me. If he’d stuck with that and reinforced it with a barrage of ads echoing the same message — that Trump is nothing more than a brand name on an empty suit maybe he could have an impact. But I’ll be surprised if this works.

.