Skip to content

Month: February 2016

What’s he hiding down below? #Trumpstaxes

What’s he hiding down below?

by digby

Just as I was in the depths of despair about never being able to play that “Game On” campaign song for Rick Santorum again, Mitt Romney emerges to lift my spirits. The man who refused to show his own taxes returns when he ran for president is now baiting Donald Trump into showing his, hinting darkly that there’s something very,very wrong with them.

And that means I get to post this!

I don’t know what would be in them that could really hurt him except for one thing: the fact that he’s not nearly as rich as he says he is. Other than that — cheating, off-shoring, huge debt, none of it would matter to his voters.  If he turns out not to really be a billionaire as he brags he is to everyone who will listen, they might mind. Or not. As we know he could shoot someone in the middle of 5th avenue and he wouldn’t lose votes so …

.

A blond-tufted silverback gorilla #Trump

A blond-tufted silverback gorilla

by digby

Poor Marco Rubio. He still doesn’t know what he’s up against. I wrote about it for Salon today:

Marco Rubio, the putative runner-up for the Republican nomination, told the press yesterday that he would not win the race by being mean. When the  “Today” show’s Willie Geist asked him why he still didn’t need to attack Donald Trump, he said,  “That is a media narrative… I’m not in this race to attack anyone… I didn’t run for office to tear up other Republicans.” He’s such a nice young man, isn’t he? So well-mannered. But you have to wonder just what race he thinks he’s running in because whether he likes it or not he’s about to be deluged with a flood of toxic insults which may leave him permanently scarred.  As a headline at The Week put it: “Donald Trump is about to do terrible things to Marco Rubio.”
That article was written by Paul Waldman, who astutely observed:
As bullies go, Donald Trump is unusually skilled.
When Trump decides to go after you, he considers carefully both your weak points and the audience for his attack. So when he decided to pummel Jeb Bush — apparently for his own amusement, as much as out of any real political concerns — he hit upon the idea that Bush was “low energy,” something Bush had a hard time countering without sounding like a whiny grade-schooler saying, “Am not!” More than anything else it was a dominance display, a way of showing voters he could push Jeb around and there was nothing Jeb could do about it. With a primary electorate primed by years of watching their candidates fetishize manliness and aggression, the attack touched a nerve.
Donald Trump may be the best bully American politics has ever seen. He’s a blond-tufted  silverback gorilla who’s laid waste to each rival, one by one. He’s still got Cruz and Rubio circling warily but his blood is up and he’s ready to dispatch them both.  Over the course of the last few weeks, he’s whittled away at Cruz’s reputation (with Rubio’s wide-eyed assistance) and managed to turn him into the mentally unstable ghost of Lee Atwater.  Now it’s Rubio’s turn. And poor Rubio doesn’t seem to be aware of what’s about to hit him.
It’s not easy to defend against Trump. As Waldman points out, Trump throws a bunch of insults at the wall to see what will stick. Once he finds what works, and he’s very good at recognizing a person’s weak points, he never lets up.  Rubio is going to find that being the “nice guy” is unlikely to shield him from the onslaught.
How did this happen? Trump is a circus clown, a WWE sideshow of a candidate who has no idea about policy and apparently no knowledge of how the U.S. Government actually functions. He seems to think the president’s job is to order police agencies and the leaders of foreign countries to do his bidding. He apparently believes the job is Emperor of the World. So, perhaps it’s understandable that none of his rivals or the rest of the Party thought he could possibly last. He would step on his own tongue one too many times and that would be that.
However, it’s been obvious for some months now that this guy was the definition of a Teflon Don. And that’s because whenever he insults someone, whether it’s war hero John McCain or Fox news anchor Megyn Kelly even the Pope, it’s all about that “display of dominance.” (On one of the cable networks they asked Nevada Trump voters about the pope dust-up and one of them simply said, “The pope started it” which is exactly how a schoolyard bully’s posse would respond.) They should have shifted gears a long time ago.
Ben Wallace-Wells at the New Yorker asked GOP strategist Stuart Stevens (no friend of Trump) what he thought had gone wrong and he had some interesting insights. He first criticized the much used and abused “lane metaphor” which caused Trump’s rivals to adopt a strategy to concentrate on certain segments of the electorate. Trump meanwhile has been trying to win the elections. Stevens says this “lane” strategy has led to disaster. “It’s like some mass hysteria—it’s like the tulip mania of politics,” he says.
He’s right about Trump. He’s not a typical political tactician trying to slice off certain pieces of the base to put together a coalition to win the nomination then planning to “pivot” to the center. He doesn’t play that way.  He’s no party man, he cares nothing for the institution or the ideology of the GOP. The only reason he’s running as a Republican at all is because he knows that’s where the racists, xenophobes and hardcore authoritarians are and that’s his central message. He could have run as an Independent but then he wouldn’t have gotten the debates or the free media attention that he knew would fuel his run. He’s been running a general election campaign from the beginning, believing sincerely that his message is universal.
But Stevens makes another point that is extremely important. Whether it’s because of the “lane” theory or the idea that his voters are so sensitive they’ll hate you if you criticize him, the fact remains that none of these people have even attempted to really run against him. Even the Super PACs have been soft. Ads like this one by the Club for Growth, going on about “eminent domain” could have been done by a group of little old ladies at the Springfield Republican Sewing and Garden Club. And as I noted yesterday, the so-called “dirty tricks” deployed in South Carolina on behalf of Cruz were (1) against Rubio not Trump, and (2) lame.
Conservative writer Matt Lewis has called the Republican establishment “stupid and gutless” for failing to attack Trump. He suggests that someone run an ad that tells people how he cut off medical care to a sick infant (his own nephew)—just to get back at his parents.  Here’s what Stuart Stevens says would be a real campaign against Donald Trump:
“The way to beat Donald Trump is to go after the essence of Donald Trump,” Stevens said. “Donald Trump is a ridiculous figure. He’s not a particular business success. Four bankruptcies! He doesn’t have a junior-high-school-level understanding of policy—he doesn’t know what the nuclear triad is. You’ve got to turn to Donald Trump in a debate and say, ‘You’re a ridiculous figure. You don’t know what you’re talking about. And this tariff idea will cost jobs, it will damage the economy, just like you bankrupted Atlantic City.’ ” Stevens recalled that after Vladimir Putin said some nice things about Trump, the candidate arranged his entire foreign policy around a pro-Putin stance. Trump is “like a stray dog,” Stevens said. “Pat him on the head and he’ll follow you home.”
Who knows if it will work?  So far, nothing he does seems to hurt him with his voters.  As he himself has said, he could “shoot someone in the middle of 5th Avenue and he wouldn’t lose any votes.”  But the man does have a lot of vulnerabilities, as Stuart says.  Maybe if someone actually tried to run against him, people might see that. As it stands he just looks like the big blond tufted Silverback strutting around, pounding his chest and dominating every competitor in the territory. Until someone actually engages with him, nobody will know how strong he really is. The way it’s going that person is going to be a Democrat, not a Republican.

Maybe he was just afraid

Maybe he was just afraid

by digby

People have been wondering why Chris Christie didn’t turn his considerable talents for bullying against the big bully Donald Trump when he had the chance. He’s apparently very defensive about it, with most people explaining that he was fighting Rubio for the “establishment lane” in New Hampshire so going after the front-runner didn’t make sense.

But it may have been something else:

Even if Christie could have made an impact, his counselors said, they weren’t sure it would have helped them.

“Is it a confrontation for confrontation’s sake? Was that going to accrue to our benefit or to someone else’s benefit?” the adviser asked.

Another top Christie adviser said, “A lot of times we were playing a short-term game. We were playing to get in to the next debate.”

“Nobody wants to be a suicide bomber,” this adviser said. “Then you’ve decided you’re part of a cause and not a candidacy.”

Now, some in New Jersey are already speculating that Christie could endorse Trump in order to curry favor with the GOP frontrunner in the hope of being named attorney general.

Christie has known Trump for 13 years. “We’ve always gotten along. Been friends for 13 years. I went to his wedding, the third one,” Christie told me over the summer.

A close Christie confidante, asked via text message Wednesday about the possibility of the governor endorsing Trump, did not rule it out.

“You never know,” he wrote back.

Mr integrity.

Or maybe the truth is really that Christie is one of those bullies who only picks on people who can’t fight back. Trump would have fought back and I’d imagine it wouldn’t have been pretty.

.

“I was misinformed” by @BloggersRUs

“I was misinformed”
by Tom Sullivan

Interesting conversation last night on All In with Chris Hayes. Hayes spoke with Donald Trump voters in Las Vegas during this week’s caucuses. Supporters see Trump as aggressive, strong, and bold, and they like what they see. Ted Cruz? He cheated. Marco Rubio is an “establishment shill.”

Ideology, class, etc., according to one researcher Hayes cited, has “no statistical bearing” on support for Trump, but rather an inclination towards authoritarianism. In the segment with Jess McIntosh (Emily’s List), Sam Seder (Majority Report), and Nick Confessore (New York Times), Hayes’guests noted that Trump voters tend to compartmentalize Trump the performer from Trump the prospective president. They look past Trump’s bombast, the cursing and slurs and see someone genuine, as suggested by one woman who had voted for Obama twice. “I go past it,” she said. She doesn’t take the wild statements seriously. She could be in for a big surprise.

Olivia Nuzzi of Daily Beast felt voting for Trump is a “middle finger vote,” echoing the South Carolina car salesman last week. But Hayes admitted that Trump voters he met were “much more reasonable” than generally portrayed.

One gets the impression that Trump’s attraction is he makes voters feel like contestants in his nationwide reality show. Trump fans may all not be wild-eyed xenophobes, but do they know where they want the country to go or are they all just middle finger? Are they crawling through the desert toward a mirage and drinking the sand?

What was striking in Trump supporters Hayes interviewed was their admiration for Trump the businessman. Trump supporters want government run like a business. Seriously. Still held up as paragons, businessmen are, in spite of all that transpired over the last decades. In spite of a world economy brought to its knees by businessmen. In spite of deepening inequality fed by businessmen shipping American jobs offshore. In spite of declining wages and benefits even as corporate profits soar. In spite of an American city poisoned by businessmen with minds like spreadsheets. Trump voters came to desert Las Vegas the way Bogart’s Rick Blaine came to Casablanca for the waters. They are misinformed.

Coolidge said the chief business of the American people is business. But Trump voters don’t seem to have caught on that the chief business of business is not America.

That snake oil is tasty #BenCarson

That snake oil is tasty

by digby





This is hard to believe but it’s true. Ben Carson was on CNN yesterday and said this about his year-end staff shake-up:

“We had people who didn’t really seem to understand finances,” a laughing Carson told CNN’s Poppy Harlow on “CNN Newsroom,” adding, “or maybe they did—maybe they were doing it on purpose.”

Hahaha. Maybe they were doing it on purpose! How funny. Except it’s really not.

Carson has taken in incredible amounts of money during the race. His campaign has raised more than any other Republican presidential rival, though they’ve raised more when super PACs are included. But he’s also spent more than any of them, so that despite his prolific fundraising, he has barely $4 million in cash on hand.

That’s because Team Carson has been plowing a huge portion of the money it raises back into fundraising, using costly direct-mail and telemarketing tactics. Pretty much every campaign uses those tools, but the extent to which Carson was using it raised eyebrows around politics. First, many of the companies being paid millions and millions of dollars are run by top campaign officials or their friends and relations, meaning those people are making a mint. Second, many of the contributions are coming from small-dollar donors.

If that money is being given by well-meaning grassroots conservatives for a campaign that’s designed not to win but to produce revenue for venders, isn’t it just a grift?

Yes, it is. And it’s pathetic that he keeps right on chugging, appearing in debates, messing up the primary and collecting money from average Americans who think he’s that guy who wrote “Healing Hands” instead of the creepy weirdo he is today. The good news is that the money is no longer flowing. His marks seem to have wised up.

By the way, he raised over 60 million dollars. Yes, you read that right.

.

He’s got the tween vote in his pocket #liketotallyteamedward

He’s got the tween vote in his pocket

by digby

photoshopped obviously

… if you’re Team Edward, anyway.

He may not know anything about policy or government, but that’s not to say he’s not an expert on something:

This actually happened people. That man is now the frontrunner for the GOP nomination for president.

No the president is not going to put a Republican on the bench

No the president is not going to put a Republican on the bench

by digby

This is a political ploy to put Republicans on the spot, nothing more:

Brian Sandoval, the centrist Republican governor of Nevada, is being vetted by the White House for a possible nomination to the Supreme Court, according to two people familiar with the process.

Sandoval is increasingly viewed by some key Democrats as perhaps the only nominee President Obama could select who would be able to break a Republican blockade in the Senate.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday pledged “no action” on any Supreme Court nomination before November’s election, saying the decision ought to be left to the next president.

Speaking to reporters Wednesday, White House press secretary Josh Earnest would not comment specifically on whether the administration was considering Sandoval, on the grounds that he did not want “to get into a rhythm of responding” to every report on a potential nominee. But he said that Obama was committed to finding “the best person to fill the vacancy at the Supreme Court,” regardless of whether that person is a Democrat or Republican.

“The president’s focused on criteria that, frankly, is more important, and that is that individual’s qualifications, and their experience and their view of the law,” Earnest said. “That will take precedence over any sort of political consideration.”

I hope everybody keeps their heads about this — it’s a very remote possibility that he would do it and they wouldn’t accept if he did. They could theoretically change their minds about holding a hearing or two, but there will be no confirmation of anyone. Obama could pick Rush Limbaugh and they wouldn’t confirm him. This is now a base motivating election issue that both parties are going to try to take advantage of.

I think this is now a perception game of cat and mouse. The White House will try to put the Senate on the spot as GOP leaders try to keep their base from blowing up while allowing their swing state senators room to maneuver so they don’t get wiped out in the fall.  It’s advantage White House on that one.

But no, a Republican “centrist” will not be confirmed.

.

Trump’s “program”

Trump’s “program”

by digby

Jim Tankersley makes the case that a Trump nomination could be good for Rubio and Cruz’s career. It’s interesting and well worth reading if you’re a political junkie who enjoys this sort of navel gazing (as I do.)

But this struck me as worth pointing out because it’s become an article of faith among lots of people and not just Trump’s rivals on the stump that he is a closet progressive who will pass all kinds of lefty policies if he gets into office.  Here’s one passing comment that illustrates that:

Even if Trump beats the Democratic nominee, he could prove ripe for a primary challenge in four years if he, say, pushed a single-payer health care plan through Congress.

Trump has said that he’d support single payer. This makes liberals excited and Conservatives apoplectic. But Donald Trump doesn’t know what “single payer” is. Indeed, he’s so completely clueless about health care policy that he might as well be speaking in  tongues:


I think I’m closer to common sense. We are going to repeal Obamacare.
We’re going to repeal Obamacare. We are going to replace Obamacare with something so much better. And there are so many examples of it. And I will tell you, part of the reason we have some people laughing, because you have insurance people that take care of everybody up here. I am self-funded. The only one they’re not taking care of is me. We have our lines around each state. The insurance companies are getting rich on Obamacare. The insurance companies are getting rich on health care and health services and everything having to do with health. 

We are going to end that. We’re going to take out the artificial boundaries, the artificial lines. We’re going to get a plan where people compete, free enterprise. They compete. So much better.  

In addition to that, you have the health care savings plans, which are excellent. What I do say is, there will be a certain number of people that will be on the street dying and as a Republican, I don’t want that to happen. We’re going to take care of people that are dying on the street because there will be a group of people that are not going to be able to even think in terms of private or anything else and we’re going to take care of those people. And I think everybody on this stage would have to agree…you’re not going to let people die, sitting in the middle of a street in any city in this country. 

That’s big of him to say that. He apparently has never heard about laws requiring emergency rooms to care for people or the safety net programs of medicare, Medicaid and the VA.

The “artificial lines he’s babbling about refer to the the old GOP trope about selling across state lines being the magical pony that will solve the health care problem. Yes, politicians are bought and sold by big business we understand that. But insurance companies are not getting rich on the law and the problems with those insurance companies will not be solved by “free enterprise.”

It’s clear that he doesn’t care about health care policy nor does he want to know anything about it. And if anyone thinks that this guy will spend even 5 seconds in office trying to push through a big single payer health care program because he says that all the politicians except for him are Insurance company whores, they’re not listening to what this man is actually saying.

He hits his rivals on anything and everything he can think of and it has no bearing on his actually beliefs or policies. He is the last man on the planet who actually cares about the influence of lobbyists — unless they advocating for the Chinese or the Mexicans. That’s who he blames, not American businesses.  Listen to what he says.

Why people persist in believing that this celebrity plutocrat has some kind of coherent program beyond building walls, banning religions and persecuting minorities escapes me. It’s especially ludicrous that this billionaire who gladly admits to buying and selling politicians as “part of doing business” is some kind of economic populist is ridiculous. Sure, he promises to enact protectionist policies (“make better deals”) with foreign governments, but I’m going to guess that his understanding and concern for the needs of American workers might not be what people hope.

He is a white nationalist, authoritarian demagogue period. He’s just vamping on the rest of it saying whatever it takes to make his rivals squirm.

Quotes ‘O The Day: Jamelle Bouie

Quotes ‘O The Day: Jamelle Bouie

by digby

Some truth about America that nobody wants to hear. This is the dynamic that defines this era:

Seriously, was this ever in doubt? #racistTrumpvoters

Seriously, was this ever in doubt?

by digby


The New York Times:

Exit poll data from the South Carolina primary revealed that nearly half the Republicans who turned out on Saturday wanted undocumented immigrants to be deported immediately. Donald Trump won 47 percent of those voters.

Voters were asked if they favored temporarily barring Muslims who are not citizens from entering the United States, something Mr. Trump advocates, and 74 percent said they did. He won 41 percent of that group.

Mr. Trump, who handily won that South Carolina primary and all its delegates, is attracting Republican voters across demographic groups — conservatives, moderates, evangelicals and those who are not born-again Christians. In a sense, he is uniting parts of the party that have been on opposite sides of recent nomination battles.

A new set of public opinion survey results asking atypical but timely questions has shed some light on the Trump coalition. The results suggest how Mr. Trump has upended the contemporary divide in the party and built a significant part of his coalition of voters on people who are responsive to religious, social and racial intolerance.

New data from YouGov and Public Policy Polling show the extent to which he has tapped into a set of deeply rooted racial attitudes. But first, two caveats about these data are worth bearing in mind. The national YouGov survey was done near the middle of January, before the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire and South Carolina primaries. Public Policy Polling is a company aligned with the Democratic Party, and some of its results over the years have been suspected of bias. Taken by itself, its conclusions could be doubted. Taken with the YouGov and exit poll data, however, these three surveys can give us a better idea of Mr. Trump’s backers.

Mr. Trump’s support among those who say they support a temporary ban on Muslim entry into the United States — a notion Mr. Trump first advanced in early December — is significant. He won more than twice as many supporters of the ban in South Carolina as any other candidate. Voters often echo the things candidates say on the campaign trail, so that level may not be revelatory.

Possibly more surprising are the attitudes of Mr. Trump’s supporters on things that he has not talked very much about on the campaign trail. He has said nothing about a ban on gays in the United States, the outcome of the Civil War or white supremacy. Yet on all of these topics, Mr. Trump’s supporters appear to stand out from the rest of Republican primary voters.

Data from Public Policy Polling show that a third of Mr. Trump’s backers in South Carolina support barring gays and lesbians from entering the country. This is nearly twice the support for this idea (17 percent) among Ted Cruz’s and Marco Rubio’s voters and nearly five times the support of John Kasich’s and Ben Carson’s supporters (7 percent).

Similarly, YouGov data reveal that a third of Mr. Trump’s (and Mr. Cruz’s) backers believe that Japanese internment during World War II was a good idea, while roughly 10 percent of Mr. Rubio’s and Mr. Kasich’s supporters do. Mr. Trump’s coalition is also more likely to disagree with the desegregation of the military (which was ordered in 1948 by Harry Truman) than other candidates’ supporters are.

The P.P.P. poll asked voters if they thought whites were a superior race. Most Republican primary voters in South Carolina — 78 percent — disagreed with this idea (10 percent agreed and 11 percent weren’t sure). But among Mr. Trump’s supporters, only 69 percent disagreed. Mr. Carson’s voters were the most opposed to the notion (99 percent), followed by Mr. Kasich and Mr. Cruz’s supporters at 92 and 89 percent. Mr. Rubio’s backers were close to the average level of disagreement (76 percent).

According to P.P.P., 70 percent of Mr. Trump’s voters in South Carolina wish the Confederate battle flag were still flying on their statehouse grounds. (It was removed last summer less than a month after a mass shooting at a black church in Charleston.) The polling firm says that 38 percent of them wish the South had won the Civil War. Only a quarter of Mr. Rubio’s supporters share that wish, and even fewer of Mr. Kasich’s and Mr. Carson’s do.

Nationally, the YouGov data show a similar trend: Nearly 20 percent of Mr. Trump’s voters disagreed with the freeing of slaves in Southern states after the Civil War. Only 5 percent of Mr. Rubio’s voters share this view.

Mr. Trump’s popularity with white, working-class voters who are more likely than other Republicans to believe that whites are a supreme race and who long for the Confederacy may make him unpopular among leaders in his party. But it’s worth noting that he isn’t persuading voters to hold these beliefs. The beliefs were there — and have been for some time.

Mr. Trump has reinvigorated explicit appeals to ethnocentrism, and some voters are responding.

Some of those results:


-70% think the Confederate flag should still be flying over the State Capital, to
only 20% who agree with it being taken down. In fact 38% of Trump voters say
they wish the South had won the Civil War
to only 24% glad the North won and
38% who aren’t sure. Overall just 36% of Republican primary voters in the state
are glad the North emerged victorious to 30% for the South, but Trump’s the only
one whose supporters actually wish the South had won. 

There’s also 62/23 support among Trump voters for creating a national database of Muslims and 40/36 support for shutting down all the mosques in the United States, something no one else’s voters back. Only 44% of Trump voters think the practice of Islam should even be legal at all in the United States

Your 2016 GOP ladies and gentlemen. Keep this in mind when you hear people explain how Trump is a moderate who is appealing to people on economic grounds.

.